Limitations of detection of malignancy in pleural effusions using ELISA-based TRAP assay: comparison with cytological examination

Current and future options for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a frequent problem faced by clinicians, but tumor pleural involvement can be seen without effusion.

AREAS COVERED

Imaging, pleural fluid analysis, biomarkers for MPE, needle pleural biopsy and thoracoscopy. To prepare this review, we performed a search using keywords: 'diagnosis' + 'malignant' + 'pleural' + 'effusion' (all fields) in PubMed, and found 4106 articles overall (until 16 January 2013, 881 in the last 5 years).

EXPERT OPINION

Ultrasound techniques will stay as valuable tools for pleural effusions. Biomarkers in pleural fluid do not currently provide an acceptable yield for MPE. In subjects with past history of asbestos exposure, some serum or plasma markers (soluble mesothelin, fibulin) might help in selecting cases for close follow-up, to detect mesothelioma early. Needle pleural biopsy is justified only if used with image-techniques (ultrasound or CT) guidance, and thoracoscopy is better for both diagnosis and immediate palliative treatment (pleurodesis). Animal models of MPE and 'spheroids' are promising for research involving both pathophysiology and therapy. Considering the possibility of direct pleural delivery of nanotechnology-developed compounds-fit to both diagnosis and therapy purposes ('theranostics')-MPE and mesothelioma in particular are likely to benefit sooner than later from this exciting perspective.

Methylation of the hTERT promoter: a novel cancer biomarker for leptomeningeal metastasis detection in cerebrospinal fluids

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases is usually confirmed by the finding of malignant cells by cytologic examination in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). More sensitive and specific cancer biomarkers may improve the detection of tumor cells in the CSF. Promoter methylation of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene characterizes most cancer cells. The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive method to detect hTERT methylation and to explore its use as a cancer biomarker in CSF.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In 77 CSF specimens from 67 patients, hTERT promoter methylation was evaluated using real-time methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) and real-time TaqMan PCR and MS-HRM in a single-tube assay.

RESULTS

Real-time MS-HRM assay was able to detect down to 1% hTERT-methylated DNA in a background of unmethylated DNA. PCR products were obtained from 90% (69/77) of CSF samples. No false positive hTERT was detected in the 21 non-neoplastic control cases, given to the method a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity of the real-time MS-HRM compared with the cytologic gold standard analysis was of 92% (11/12). Twenty-six CSFs from 22 patients with an hTERT-methylated primary tumor showed cytologic results suspicious for malignancy; in 17 (65%) of them, a diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases could be confirmed by the hTERT methylation test.

CONCLUSION

The hTERT real-time MS-HRM approach is fast, specific, sensitive, and could therefore become a valuable tool for diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases as an adjunct to the traditional examination of CSF.

Telomerase activity assay for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion: A meta-analysis

The telomerase activity assay has been established for the detection of malignant pleural effusion (MPE), however, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the telomerase activity assay for MPE remains unclear. We performed a systematic search in the Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify published studies that have evaluated the diagnostic role of the telomerase activity assay for MPE. Sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of the telomerase activity assay in the diagnosis of MPE were pooled using the random effects models. A summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to summarize overall test performance. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing MPE were 0.76 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.72–0.80] and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83–0.91), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 5.19 (95% CI, 2.36–11.42), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.11–0.53) and the diagnostic odds ratio was 23.18 (95% CI, 6.11–87.83). The area under the SROC curve was 0.92. The telomerase activity assay plays a role in the diagnosis of MPE with a relatively high specificity. The results of a telomerase activity assay should be interpreted together with the combination of other test results and clinical findings.

Prevalence of telomerase activity in human cancer

Telomerase activity has been measured in a wide variety of cancerous and non-cancerous tissue types, and the vast majority of clinical studies have shown a direct correlation between it and the presence of cancerous cells. Telomerase plays a key role in cellular immortality and tumorigenesis. Telomerase is activated in 80-90% of human carcinomas, but not in normal somatic cells, therefore, its detection holds promise as a diagnostic marker for cancer. Measurable levels of telomerase have been detected in malignant cells from various samples: tissue from gestational trophoblastic neoplasms; squamous carcinoma cells from oral rinses; lung carcinoma cells from bronchial washings; colorectal carcinoma cells from colonic luminal washings; bladder carcinoma cells from urine or bladder washings; and breast carcinoma or thyroid cancer cells from fine needle aspirations. Such clinical tests for telomerase can be useful as non-invasive and cost-effective methods for early detection and monitoring of cancer. In addition, telomerase activity has been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in late-stage diseases such as non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and soft tissue sarcomas. In such cases, testing for telomerase activity can be used to identify patients with a poor prognosis and to select those who might benefit from adjuvant treatment. Our review of the latest medical advances in this field reveals that telomerase holds great promise as a biomarker for early cancer detection and monitoring, and has considerable potential as the basis for developing new anticancer therapies.

Telomerase activity in effusions: a comparison between telomere repeat amplification protocol in situ and conventional telomere repeat amplification protocol assay

CONTEXT

We previously found telomere repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) in situ helpful in the diagnosis of malignancy in effusions, whereas varying sensitivities and specificities for malignancy were reported by investigators using extract-based TRAP.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 2 methods and to elucidate the discrepancies between them.

DESIGN

Twenty-three effusions were analyzed. Telomerase activity of whole cell lysate was measured with a Telo TAGGG telomerase polymerase chain reaction ELISA PLUS kit with modifications to exclude polymerase chain reaction inhibitors. TRAP in situ was performed on cytospins. An estimate of total TRAP activity in the specimen was made based on the amount of positive cells, their fluorescence intensity, and the proportion of different cell types in the specimen. The estimate was compared with the level of telomerase activity in cell lysate-based TRAP.

RESULTS

TRAP in situ: Thirteen of 14 malignant cases and 2 of 2 equivocal cases showed moderate/strong reactivity. Five of 7 benign effusions were negative; in 2 of 7, mesothelial cells showed weak reactivity. Cell lysate-based TRAP assay: In 4 cases no internal standard was detected, indicating the presence of polymerase chain reaction inhibitors. The relative telomerase activities were 33.1 to 72.7 with a considerable overlap between malignant (48 +/- 9, mean +/- SD) and benign (43 +/- 9) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRAP in situ results correlated to final diagnoses, whereas the cell lysate-based TRAP assay did not differentiate between malignant and benign cases. The varying proportions of positive cells and the variation in fluorescence intensity in the TRAP in situ slides explained some of the discrepancies. The problems encountered with TRAP performed on cell lysates are partly overcome using TRAP in situ.

The evolving role of interventional pulmonary in the interdisciplinary approach to the staging and management of lung cancer. Part III: diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions

The diagnosis and management of a malignant pleural effusion can be one of the most vexing problems faced by physicians and their patients. Lung cancer is the most common primary tumor of origin with a prognosis that is limited, but variable and correlated with performance status (PS). Therefore, with a poor PS and known advanced lung cancer, establishing whether or not an effusion is malignant might not be necessary. Conversely, identifiable subsets of patients will have a much better survival, and establishing a definitive diagnosis could be of critical importance. In the great majority of cases, a diagnosis can be determined by serial thoracenteses with or without closed pleural biopsy. However, thoracoscopy is increasingly being utilized and can expedite the workup by obviating the need for repeated thoracenteses and/or closed pleural biopsy, while in the same setting providing definitive palliative treatment. Although studies comparing diagnostic and treatment strategies are limited, we will present the available data with the intention of providing the practicing oncologist with a practical strategy for the diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions due to lung cancer. The interventional pulmonologist can play an important role from diagnosis to palliation, greatly facilitating the care of patients with malignant pleural effusions.

MN/CA9: a potential gene marker for detection of malignant cells in effusions

Many cancers cause malignant effusions. The presence of malignant cells in effusions has implications in diagnosis, tumour staging and prognosis. The detection of malignant cells currently presents a challenge for cytopathologists. New adjunctive methods are needed. Although the effusions provide excellent materials for molecular assay, the available molecular markers are extremely limited, which hinders its clinical application. MN/CA9 has proved to be a valuable marker in many cancers such as lung, breast, colon, kidney, etc. The present study was to evaluate MN/CA9 as a new molecular marker for the detection of cancer cells in pleural effusions. Seventy-one pleural effusions including 59 malignant effusions from patients with cancer, and 12 patients with benign diseases as a control, were subjected to RT-PCR for detection of MN/CA9 gene expression. MN/CA9 gene expression was detected in 53/59 (89.8%) pleural effusions from cancer patients (15/16 for breast cancers, 10/11 for lung cancers, 4/4 for ovary cancers, 2/3 for colon-rectal cancers, 5/6 for cancers of unknown site, 7/8 for mesothelioma and 10/11 for other cancers). Furthermore, MN/CA9 was positive in 13/18 (72.2%) of cytologically negative effusions of cancer patients. MN/CA9 was detected in only 1/12 (8.3%) effusions from the control patients (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of MN/CA9 gene expression were, respectively, 89.8% and 91.7%. Our preliminary results suggest that MN/CA9 could be a potential marker for the detection of malignant cells in effusions. A large-scale study is needed to confirm these results.

Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and immunocytology in carcinomatous effusions

BACKGROUND

Immunocytology substantially improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional cytology in the diagnosis of carcinomatous effusions. Due to the unequivocal characterization of the various cell populations, a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 100% was achieved by immunocytology, examining samples of 1234 serous effusions.

OBJECTIVE

Cytology plays a central role in the aetiological clarification of serous effusions. The sensitivity of this method for the diagnosis of carcinomatous effusions varies between 40% and 80%. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether immunocytology substantially improves the diagnostic quality of the cytological examination in the diagnosis of carcinomatous effusions.

METHOD

Consecutive serous effusions were examined by conventional cytology and by immunocytology. The immunocytological examination was performed on smears, using a standard panel of three antibodies against pancytokeratin, human epithelial antigen 125 and calretinin.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1234 effusion samples were examined. A total of 603 effusions were caused by carcinomas, five by malignant mesotheliomas, 11 by malignant lymphomas and 615 by non-malignant disorders. In conventional cytology, carcinomatous effusions were correctly diagnosed in 314 samples, corresponding to a sensitivity of 52%. In 31 specimens (5%) tumour cells without further specification were described and in 161 samples (27%) the presence of tumour cells was suspected (84% overall sensitivity). A total of 97 carcinomatous effusions (16%) were diagnosed false-negatively and 50 (8%) of the 615 non-malignant effusions false-positively (92% specificity). In immunocytology, 561 carcinomatous samples were correctly diagnosed, representing a sensitivity of 93%. In six cases (1%) the presence of tumour cells was suspected. A total of 36 carcinomatous effusions (6%) were diagnosed false-negatively (94% over-all sensitivity). Out of the 615 non-malignant specimens, there were no false-positive diagnoses (100% specificity).

CONCLUSION

Immunocytology is a simple, cost-effective, routinely practicable method which substantially improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional cytology in the diagnosis of carcinomatous effusions. Therefore, we recommend the use of immunocytology in all those cases where cytology on its own is not completely unequivocal.

Clinical significance of telomerase activity in peritoneal lavage fluid from patients with gastric cancer and its relationship with cellular proliferation

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of telomerase activity assay and peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) examination in peritoneal lavage fluid for the prediction of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients, and to explore the relationship between telomerase activity and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression.

METHODS: Telomeric repeated amplification protocol (TRAP)-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure the telomerase activity in 60 patients with gastric cancer and 50 with peptic ulcer. PLC analysis of the 60 patients with gastric cancer was used for comparison. The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in gastric carcinoma was immunohistochemically examined.

RESULTS: The telomerase activity and PLC positive rate in peritoneal lavage fluid from patients with gastric cancer was 41.7% (25/60), and 25.0% (15/60), respectively. The positive rate of telomerase activity was significantly higher than that of PLC in the group of pT₄ (15/16 vs 9/16, P < 0.05), P_1-3 (13/13 vs 9/13, P < 0.05) and diffuse type (22/42 vs 13/42, P < 0.05). The patients with positive telomerase activity, peritoneal metastasis, and serosal invasion had significantly higher levels of average PCNA proliferation index (PI), (55.00 ± 6.59 vs 27.43 ± 7.72, 57.26 ± 10.18 vs 29.15 ± 8.31, and 49.82 ± 6.74 vs 24.65 ± 7.33, respectively, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The TRAP assay for telomerase activity is a useful adjunct for cytologic method in the diagnosis of peritoneal micrometastasis and well related to higher proliferating activity of gastric cancer. The results of this study also suggest a promising future therapeutic strategy for treating peritoneal dissemination based on telomerase inhibition.