Lysine-binding species of lipoprotein(a) in coronary artery disease

Stimulatory effects of lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein on human umbilical vein endothelial cell migration and proliferation are partially mediated by fibroblast growth factor-2

We previously reported a transient increase in plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentrations following acute myocardial infarction and surgical operations, and demonstrated Lp(a) accumulation in healing tissues. In the present study, the stimulatory effect of Lp(a) on migration and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) was assessed by quantitative assay methods and compared it with that of LDL. Lp(a) stimulated both migration and proliferation of HUVEC in a dose-dependent manner and the stimulatory activities for migration and proliferation were two times higher than those of LDL in terms of moles of apoB. In addition, this stimulatory activity of Lp(a) was not affected by the difference of Lp(a) phenotype. Although each neutralizing antibody to hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) had no further effect on migration and proliferation of HUVEC treated with Lp(a), only antibody to fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) partially suppressed them. Moreover, pertussis toxin, which inhibits FGF-2-stimulated endothelial cell movement, also partially suppressed Lp(a)-induced HUVEC migration. FGF-2 concentrations in the medium of HUVEC treated with Lp(a) were constant in spite of the increase in FGF-2 mRNA levels in HUVEC. Taken together, it is suggest that Lp(a) stimulates HUVEC migration and proliferation, which is mediated, at least in part, by FGF-2 and may promote the angiogenesis during wound healing.

Lipoprotein(a): structural implications for pathophysiology

The assembly between a low-density lipoprotein particle and apolipoprotein(a), a highly carbohydrate-rich protein, gives origin to a peculiar class of lipoproteins, only found in the hedgehog, primates, and humans, termed lipoprotein(a). Apolipoprotein(a), which shares a high degree of sequence homology with the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen, is linked to the apolipoprotein B-100 component of low-density lipoprotein via a disulfide bond and confers distinct biochemical and metabolic properties to lipoprotein(a). Because of its peculiar structural features and the observed correlation between high lipoprotein(a) levels and the development of a variety of atherosclerotic disorders, this lipoprotein has become the focus of an intense research effort. Although accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in the vessel wall at sites of vascular injury has been clearly evidenced, the mechanism(s) by which lipoprotein(a) exerts its pathogenic effect in this milieu remain largely unknown. It has been hypothesized that the pathological effect of lipoprotein(a) is related either to its similarity to low-density lipoprotein (i.e., a pro-atherogenic effect) or to the apolipoprotein(a) similarity to plasminogen (i.e., a pro-thrombotic/anti-fibrinolytic effect). However, it is probable that both components contribute to the pathogenicity of lipoprotein(a). The fact that lipoprotein(a) levels are largely genetically determined, varying widely among individuals and racial groups, adds additional elements to the scientific interest that surrounds this lipoprotein. Both clinical and biochemical studies of lipoprotein(a) have been complicated by the high degree of structural heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a), which is considered the most polymorphic protein in human plasma. Our aim in this paper is to provide an overview of the most salient structural features of lipoprotein(a) and their possible pathophysiological implications.

Simple and rapid procedure for the purification of lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density lipoprotein-like particle displaying strong athero-thrombotic properties. Highly purified Lp(a) is increasingly requested for standardization of Lp(a) measurements and for biological studies. Several procedures have been described for Lp(a) separation and purification but none of them appear completely suitable. We present here a procedure for Lp(a) purification based on sequential elutions after lysine-Sepharose affinity chromatography. We were able to identify four distinct subspecies of Lp(a) showing different affinity to epsilon-amino groups of lysine-Sepharose, simply by modifying molarity and pH of the eluents; the fraction obtained in highly purified state represented the major form and could be eluted with 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 4.4). Advantages of this procedure are represented by simplicity, rapidity and final yield.

A quantitative immunoassay for the lysine-binding function of lipoprotein(a). Application to recombinant apo(a) and lipoprotein(a) in plasma

Apo(a), the unique apoprotein of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), can express lysine-binding sites(s) (LBS). However, the LBS activity of Lp(a) is variable, and this heterogeneity may influence its pathogenetic properties. An LBS-Lp(a) immunoassay has been developed to quantitatively assess the LBS function of Lp(a). Lp(a) within a sample is captured with an immobilized monoclonal antibody specific for apo(a), and the captured Lp(a) is reacted with an antibody specific for functional LBS. The binding of this LBS-specific antibody is then quantified by using an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated disclosing antibody. The critical LBS-specific antibody was raised to kringle 4 of plasminogen. When applied to plasma samples, the LBS activity of Lp(a) ranged from 0% to 100% of an isolated reference Lp(a); the signal corresponded to the percent retention of Lp(a) on a lysine-Sepharose but did not correlate well with total Lp(a) levels in plasma. Mutation of residues in the putative LBS in the carboxy-terminal kringle 4 repeat (K4-37) in an eight-kringle apo(a) construct resulted in marked but not complete loss of activity in the LBS-Lp(a) immunoassay. These data suggest that this kringle is the major but not the sole source of LBS activity in apo(a). The LBS-Lp(a) immunoassay should prove to be a useful tool in establishing the role of the LBS in the pathogenicity of Lp(a).