Over-expression of Aurora-A targets cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein and promotes mRNA polyadenylation of Cdk1 and cyclin B1

Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation Element Binding Protein 1 and Atherosclerosis: Prospective Target and New Insights

The ribonucleic acid (RNA)-binding protein Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation Element Binding Protein 1 (CPEB1), a key member of the CPEB family, is essential in controlling gene expression involved in both healthy physiological and pathological processes. CPEB1 can bind to the 3'- untranslated regions (UTR) of substrate messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and regulate its translation. There is increasing evidence that CPEB1 is closely related to the pathological basis of atherosclerosis. According to recent investigations, many pathological processes, including inflammation, lipid metabolism, endothelial dysfunction, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, cellular senescence, apoptosis, and insulin resistance, are regulated by CPEB1. This review considers the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic heart disease in relation to the evolution of the physiological function of CPEB1, recent research breakthroughs, and the potential participation of CPEB1 in atherosclerosis.

Targeting CDK1 in cancer: mechanisms and implications

Cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) are serine/threonine kinases that are proposed as promising candidate targets for cancer treatment. These proteins complexed with cyclins play a critical role in cell cycle progression. Most CDKs demonstrate substantially higher expression in cancer tissues compared with normal tissues and, according to the TCGA database, correlate with survival rate in multiple cancer types. Deregulation of CDK1 has been shown to be closely associated with tumorigenesis. CDK1 activation plays a critical role in a wide range of cancer types; and CDK1 phosphorylation of its many substrates greatly influences their function in tumorigenesis. Enrichment of CDK1 interacting proteins with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was conducted to demonstrate that the associated proteins participate in multiple oncogenic pathways. This abundance of evidence clearly supports CDK1 as a promising target for cancer therapy. A number of small molecules targeting CDK1 or multiple CDKs have been developed and evaluated in preclinical studies. Notably, some of these small molecules have also been subjected to human clinical trials. This review evaluates the mechanisms and implications of targeting CDK1 in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy.

The Centrosome, a Multitalented Renaissance Organelle

The centrosome acts as a microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) from the G₁ to G₂ phases of the cell cycle; it can mature into a spindle pole during mitosis and/or transition into a cilium by elongating microtubules (MTs) from the basal body on cell differentiation or cell cycle arrest. New studies hint that the centrosome functions in more than MT organization. For instance, it has recently been shown that a specific substructure of the centrosome-the mother centriole appendages-are required for the recycling of endosomes back to the plasma membrane. This alone could have important implications for a renaissance in our understanding of the development of primary cilia, endosome recycling, and the immune response. Here, we review newly identified roles for the centrosome in directing membrane traffic, the immunological synapse, and the stress response.

Alisertib demonstrates significant antitumor activity in bevacizumab resistant, patient derived orthotopic models of glioblastoma

Aurora A kinase (AURKA), a member of the serine/threonine kinase family, plays a critical role in cell division, and it is widely overexpressed in a variety of tumors including glioblastoma (GBM). Alisertib (MLN8237) is an orally administered selective AURKA inhibitor with potent antiproliferative activity, currently undergoing clinical testing in different tumor types. In vitro evaluation of alisertib against the primary GBM lines, GBM6, GBM10, GBM12 and GBM39 showed significant antitumor activity with IC_50s ranging between 30 and 95 nM. Orthotopic xenografts of GBM10 and the bevacizumab resistant lines GBM6 and GBM39 were established by implantating 3 × 10⁵ cells in the caudate nucleus of nude mice; animals were randomized to treatment with either alisertib 30 mg/kg/day or vehicle. In all three models, treatment with alisertib resulted in a statistically significant prolongation of survival (p < 0.0001). In addition, alisertib administration in these mice decreased phosphorylated aurora-A, induced mitotic arrest and significantly decreased histone H3 phosphorylation in tumors. In conclusion, alisertib displays significant antitumor activity against primary GBM lines and xenografts, including patient derived GBM lines resistant to bevacizumab; these data support clinical translation in GBM.

RNA interference targeting Aurora-A sensitizes glioblastoma cells to temozolomide chemotherapy

Clinically, temozolomide (TMZ) is widely used in glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. However, the toxicity of TMZ may influence the quality of patient life. Thus, novel treatment options for sensitizing GBM cells to TMZ chemotherapy are necessary. Aurora-A is widely expressed in GBM and correlated with poor prognosis. It has been proven to be an effective target for gene therapy and chemotherapy. In the present study, short hairpin (sh)RNA targeting Aurora-A was employed to knockdown Aurora-A expression in GBM cells. Cell Counting Kit-8 assays, flow cytometry, colony formation assays, invasion assays and tube formation assays were used to determine the effects of Aurora-A knockdown when combined with TMZ treatment. A U251 subcutaneous cancer model was established to evaluate the efficacy of combined therapy. The results of the present study indicated that the proliferation, colony formation, invasion and angiogenesis of GBM cells were significantly inhibited by combined therapy when compared with TMZ treatment alone. In vivo results demonstrated that knockdown of Aurora-A significantly (P=0.0084) sensitizes GBM cells to TMZ chemotherapy. The results of the present study demonstrated that knockdown of Aurora-A in GBM cells enhances TMZ sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, Aurora-A knockdown may be a novel treatment option for decreasing TMZ toxicity and improving patient quality of life.

Effects of KRC-108 on the Aurora A activity and growth of colorectal cancer cells

Aurora A is involved in regulating multiple steps of mitosis. Over-expression of Aurora A is related to tumorigenesis and poor prognosis. KRC-108 is a novel multi-kinase inhibitor which has anti-tumor activity in vivo. In this study, we identified the inhibitory effects of KRC-108 on Aurora A kinase and growth-inhibitory characteristics of KRC-108. The in vitro kinase activity assay, immunoblot, and immunofluorescence analyses demonstrated that KRC-108 inhibited Aurora A activity. KRC-108 exhibited cytotoxicity against human colorectal cancer cell line HT-29. Colony formation assays showed that KRC-108 reduced the colony growth of HT-29 cells. KRC-108 also inhibited migration of HT-29 cells. The expression levels of cyclin B1 and CDC2 were decreased by KRC-108 in HT-29 cells. Cell cycle analysis and flow cytometry indicated that the inhibitory effects of KRC-108 on cell growth are due to induction of G2/M arrest and apoptosis by inhibition of Aurora A. KRC-108 induces cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell line by Aurora A inhibition. The reported in vivo anti-tumor effects of KRC-108 might partly be due to anti-Aurora A effects. This study suggests that KRC-108 has potential for development as an anti-tumor agent, although further studies are needed.

Reduced adenosine-to-inosine miR-455-5p editing promotes melanoma growth and metastasis

Although recent studies have shown that adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing occurs in microRNAs, its effects on tumor growth and metastasis are not well understood. We present evidence of CREB-mediated low expression of ADAR1 in metastatic melanoma cell lines and tumor specimens. Re-expression of ADAR1 resulted in the suppression of melanoma growth and metastasis in vivo. Consequently, we identified 3 miRs undergoing A-to-I editing in the low-metastatic melanoma but not in highly metastatic cell lines. One of these miRs, miR-455-5p has two A-to-I RNA editing sites. The biological function of edited miR-455-5p is different from the unedited form as it recognizes different set of genes. Indeed, w.t. miR-455-5p promotes melanoma metastasis via inhibition of the tumor suppressor gene CPEB1. Moreover, w.t. miR-455 enhances melanoma growth and metastasis in vivo while the edited form inhibits these features. These results demonstrate a previously unrecognized role of RNA editing in melanoma progression.

Aurora-A inhibition offers a novel therapy effective against intracranial glioblastoma

Glioblastoma remains a devastating disease for which novel therapies are urgently needed. Here, we report that the Aurora-A kinase inhibitor alisertib exhibits potent efficacy against glioblastoma neurosphere tumor stem-like cells in vitro and in vivo. Many glioblastoma neurosphere cells treated with alisertib for short periods undergo apoptosis, although some regain proliferative activity upon drug removal. Extended treatment, however, results in complete and irreversible loss of tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, alisertib caused glioblastoma neurosphere cells to partially differentiate and enter senescence. These effects were also observed in glioma cells treated with the Aurora-A inhibitor TC-A2317 or anti-Aurora-A siRNA. Furthermore, alisertib extended median survival of mice bearing intracranial human glioblastoma neurosphere tumor xenografts. Alisertib exerted similar effects on glioblastoma neurosphere cells in vivo and resulted in markedly reduced activated phosphoThr288Aurora-A and increased abnormal mitoses and cellular ploidy, consistent with on-target activity. Our results offer preclinical proof-of-concept for alisertib as a new therapeutic for glioma treatment.

SMAD4 suppresses AURKA-induced metastatic phenotypes via degradation of AURKA in a TGFβ-independent manner

SMAD4 has been suggested to inhibit the activity of the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer. However, the mechanism by which SMAD4 antagonizes WNT/β-catenin signaling in cancer remains largely unknown. Aurora A kinase (AURKA), which is frequently overexpressed in cancer, increases the transcriptional activity of β-catenin/T-cell factor (TCF) complex by stabilizing β-catenin through the inhibition of GSK-3β. Here, SMAD4 modulated AURKA in a TGFβ-independent manner. Overexpression of SMAD4 significantly suppressed AURKA function, including colony formation, migration, and invasion of cell lines. In addition, SMAD4 bound to AURKA induced degradation of AURKA by the proteasome. A luciferase activity assay revealed that the transcriptional activity of the β-catenin/TCF complex was elevated by AURKA, but decreased by SMAD4 overexpression. Moreover, target gene analysis showed that SMAD4 abrogated the AURKA-mediated increase of β-catenin target genes. However, this inhibitory effect of SMAD4 was abolished by overexpression of AURKA or silencing of AURKA in SMAD4-overexpressed cells. Meanwhile, the SMAD4-mediated repression of AURKA and β-catenin was independent of TGFβ signaling because blockage of TGFβR1 or restoration of TGFβ signaling did not prevent suppression of AURKA and β-catenin signaling by SMAD4. These results indicate that the tumor-suppressive function of SMAD4 is mediated by downregulation of β-catenin transcriptional activity via AURKA degradation in a TGFβ-independent manner.

IMPLICATIONS

SMAD4 interacts with AURKA and antagonizes its tumor-promoting potential, thus demonstrating a novel mechanism of tumor suppression.

The selective Aurora-A kinase inhibitor MLN8237 (alisertib) potently inhibits proliferation of glioblastoma neurosphere tumor stem-like cells and potentiates the effects of temozolomide and ionizing radiation

The selective Aurora-A kinase inhibitor MLN8237 is in clinical trials for hematologic malignancies, ovarian cancer and other solid tumors. We previously showed that MLN8237 is potently antiproliferative toward standard monolayer-cultured glioblastoma cells. We have now investigated the effect of MLN8237 with and without temozolomide or ionizing radiation on the proliferation of glioblastoma tumor stem-like cells (neurospheres) using soft agar colony formation assays and normal human astrocytes by MTT assay. Western blotting was utilized to compare MLN8237 IC50s to cellular Aurora-A and phosphoThr(288)Aurora-A levels. MLN8237 was more potently antiproliferative to neurosphere cells than to standard monolayer glioma cells, and was non-toxic to normal human astrocytes. Western blot analysis revealed that MLN8237 treatment inhibits phosphoThr(288)Aurora-A levels providing proof of drug target-hit in glioblastoma cells. Furthermore, phosphoThr(288)Aurora-A levels partially predicted the antiproliferative efficacy of MLN8237. We also found that Aurora-A inhibition by MLN8237 was synergistic with temozolomide and potentiated the effects of ionizing radiation on colony formation in neurosphere glioblastoma tumor stem-like cells. These results further support the potential of Aurora-A inhibitors as primary chemotherapy agents or biologic response modifiers in glioblastoma patients.

TPX2 overexpression in medullary thyroid carcinoma mediates TT cell proliferation

TPX2 (targeting protein for xenopus kinesin-like protein 2), a microtubule-associated protein, plays an important role in the formation of the mitotic spindle. Abnormal expression of TPX2 in various types of malignant tumors has been reported, but less is known for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). We investigated the expression of TPX2 in human MTC tissues and its potential use as a therapeutic target. Immunohistochemical analysis of TPX2 expression was performed for 32 cases of MTC and 8 cases of normal thyroid. TPX2 expression was found to be significantly higher in MTC compared to normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.05), and to be associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and advanced disease stage. The cellular effects of TPX2 knockdown, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle diffusions, and mitotic gene expression were investigated using small interfering RNA (siRNA). TPX2-siRNA caused G1 and G2-phase cell cycle arrest, inhibited cell proliferation, and induced apoptosis. TPX2-siRNA also downregulated Aurora-A and cyclinB1 protein expression in MTC cells and enhanced the expression of p53 protein (P < 0.05). These results suggest that TPX2 may be of potential use as a new marker for MTC prognosis and therapy.

Requirements for Aurora-A in tissue regeneration and tumor development in adult mammals

Aurora-A is a kinase involved in the formation and maturation of the mitotic spindle and chromosome segregation. This kinase is frequently overexpressed in human cancer, and its activity may confer resistance to antitumoral drugs such as Taxol. Inhibition of Aurora-A results in mitotic defects, and this kinase is considered as an attractive therapeutic target for cancer. Nevertheless, the specific requirements for this kinase in adult mammalian tissues remain unclear. Conditional genetic ablation of Aurora-A in adult tissues results in polyploid cells that display a DNA-damage-like response characterized by the upregulation of p53 and the cell-cycle inhibitor p21(Cip1). This is accompanied by apoptotic, differentiation, or senescence markers in a tissue-specific manner. Therapeutic elimination of Aurora-A prevents the progression of skin and mammary gland tumors. However, this is not due to significant levels of apoptosis or senescence, but because Aurora-A-deficient tumors accumulate polyploid cells with limited proliferative potential. Thus, Aurora-A is required for tumor formation in vivo, and the differential response observed in various tissues might have relevant implications in current therapeutic strategies aimed at inhibiting this kinase in the treatment of human cancer.

Specificity factors in cytoplasmic polyadenylation

Poly(A) tail elongation after export of an messenger RNA (mRNA) to the cytoplasm is called cytoplasmic polyadenylation. It was first discovered in oocytes and embryos, where it has roles in meiosis and development. In recent years, however, has been implicated in many other processes, including synaptic plasticity and mitosis. This review aims to introduce cytoplasmic polyadenylation with an emphasis on the factors and elements mediating this process for different mRNAs and in different animal species. We will discuss the RNA sequence elements mediating cytoplasmic polyadenylation in the 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, including the CPE, MBE, TCS, eCPE, and C-CPE. In addition to describing the role of general polyadenylation factors, we discuss the specific RNA binding protein families associated with cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements, including CPEB (CPEB1, CPEB2, CPEB3, and CPEB4), Pumilio (PUM2), Musashi (MSI1, MSI2), zygote arrest (ZAR2), ELAV like proteins (ELAVL1, HuR), poly(C) binding proteins (PCBP2, αCP2, hnRNP-E2), and Bicaudal C (BICC1). Some emerging themes in cytoplasmic polyadenylation will be highlighted. To facilitate understanding for those working in different organisms and fields, particularly those who are analyzing high throughput data, HUGO gene nomenclature for the human orthologs is used throughout. Where human orthologs have not been clearly identified, reference is made to protein families identified in man.

Posttranslational modification of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is important in the development of the prostate by regulating transcription, cellular proliferation, and apoptosis. AR undergoes posttranslational modifications that alter its transcription activity, translocation to the nucleus and stability. The posttranslational modifications that regulate these events are of utmost importance to understand the functional role of AR and its activity. The majority of these modifications occur in the activation function-1 (AF1) region of the AR, which contains the transcriptional activation unit 1 (TAU1) and 5 (TAU5). Identification of the modifications that occur to these regions may increase our understanding of AR activation in prostate cancer and the role of AR in the progression from androgen-dependent to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Most of the posttranslational modifications identified to date have been determined using the full-length AR in androgen dependent cells. Further investigations into the role of posttranslational modifications in androgen-independent activation of full-length AR and constitutively active splicing variants are warranted, findings from which may provide new therapeutic options for CRPC.

CPEB1, a histone-modified hypomethylated gene, is regulated by miR-101 and involved in cell senescence in glioma

Epigenetic mechanisms have important roles in carcinogenesis. We certified that the mRNA translation-related gene cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein 1 (CPEB1) is hypomethylated and overexpressed in glioma cells and tissues. The knockdown of CPEB1 reduced cell senescence by regulating the expression or distribution of p53 in glioma cells. CPEB1 is also regulated directly by the tumor suppressor miR-101, a potential marker of glioma. It is known that the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and embryonic ectoderm development (EED) are direct targets of miR-101. We demonstrated that miR-101 downregulated the expression of CPEB1 through reversing the methylation status of the CPEB1 promoter by regulating the presence on the promoter of the methylation-related histones H3K4me2, H3K27me3, H3K9me3 and H4K20me3. The epigenetic regulation of H3K27me3 on CPEB1 promoter is mediated by EZH2 and EED. EZH2 has a role in the regulation of H3K4me2. Furthermore, the downregulation of CPEB1 induced senescence in a p53-dependent manner.

Aurora A kinase (AURKA) in normal and pathological cell division

Temporally and spatially controlled activation of the Aurora A kinase (AURKA) regulates centrosome maturation, entry into mitosis, formation and function of the bipolar spindle, and cytokinesis. Genetic amplification and mRNA and protein overexpression of Aurora A are common in many types of solid tumor, and associated with aneuploidy, supernumerary centrosomes, defective mitotic spindles, and resistance to apoptosis. These properties have led Aurora A to be considered a high-value target for development of cancer therapeutics, with multiple agents currently in early-phase clinical trials. More recently, identification of additional, non-mitotic functions and means of activation of Aurora A during interphase neurite elongation and ciliary resorption have significantly expanded our understanding of its function, and may offer insights into the clinical performance of Aurora A inhibitors. Here we review the mitotic and non-mitotic functions of Aurora A, discuss Aurora A regulation in the context of protein structural information, and evaluate progress in understanding and inhibiting Aurora A in cancer.

The CPEB-family of proteins, translational control in senescence and cancer

Cytoplasmic elongation of the poly(A) tail was originally identified as a mechanism to activate maternal mRNAs, stored as silent transcripts with short poly(A) tails, during meiotic progression. A family of RNA-binding proteins named CPEBs, which recruit the translational repression or cytoplasmic polyadenylation machineries to their target mRNAs, directly mediates cytoplasmic polyadenylation. Recent years have witnessed an explosion of studies showing that CPEBs are not only expressed in a variety of somatic tissues, but have essential functions controlling gene expression in time and space in the adult organism. These "new" functions of the CPEBs include regulating the balance between senescence and proliferation and its pathological manifestation, tumor development. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the functions of the CPEB-family of proteins in the regulation of cell proliferation, their target mRNAs and the mechanism controlling their activities.

Aurora A is differentially expressed in gliomas, is associated with patient survival in glioblastoma and is a potential chemotherapeutic target in gliomas

Aurora A is critical for mitosis and is overexpressed in several neoplasms. Its overexpression transforms cultured cells, and both its overexpression and knockdown cause genomic instability. In transgenic mice, Aurora A haploinsufficiency, not overexpression, leads to increased malignant tumor formation. Aurora A thus appears to have both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressor functions. Here, we report that Aurora A protein, measured by quantitative protein gel blotting, is differentially expressed in major glioma types in lineage-specific patterns. Aurora A protein levels in WHO grade II oligodendrogliomas (n=16) and grade III anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (n=16) are generally low, similar to control epilepsy cerebral tissue (n=11). In contrast, pilocytic astrocytomas (n=6) and ependymomas (n=12) express high Aurora A levels. Among grade II to grade III astrocytomas (n=7, n=14, respectively) and grade IV glioblastomas (n=31), Aurora A protein increases with increasing tumor grade. We also found that Aurora A expression is induced by hypoxia in cultured glioblastoma cells and is overexpressed in hypoxic regions of glioblastoma tumors. Retrospective Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that both lower Aurora A protein measured by quantitative protein gel blot (n=31) and Aurora A mRNA levels measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (n=58) are significantly associated with poorer patient survival in glioblastoma. Furthermore, we report that the selective Aurora A inhibitor MLN8237 is potently cytotoxic to glioblastoma cells, and that MLN8237 cytotoxicty is potentiated by ionizing radiation. MLN8237 also appeared to induce senescence and differentiation of glioblastoma cells. Thus, in addition to being significantly associated with survival in glioblastoma, Aurora A is a potential new drug target for the treatment of glioblastoma and possibly other glial neoplasms.

Human embryonic stem cells suffer from centrosomal amplification

Propagation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in culture tends to alter karyotype, potentially limiting the prospective use of these cells in patients. The chromosomal instability of some malignancies is considered to be driven, at least in part, by centrosomal overamplification, perturbing balanced chromosome segregation. Here, we report, for the first time, that very high percentage of cultured hESCs has supernumerary centrosomes during mitosis. Supernumerary centrosomes were strictly associated with an undifferentiated hESC state and progressively disappeared on prolonged propagation in culture. Improved attachment to culture substratum and inhibition of CDK2 and Aurora A (key regulators of centrosomal metabolism) diminished the frequency of multicentrosomal mitoses. Thus, both attenuated cell attachment and deregulation of machinery controlling centrosome number contribute to centrosomal overamplification in hESCs. Linking the excessive number of centrosomes in mitoses to the ploidy indicated that both overduplication within a single cell cycle and mitotic failure contributed to generation of numerical centrosomal abnormalities in hESCs. Collectively, our data indicate that supernumerary centrosomes are a significant risk factor for chromosome instability in cultured hESCs and should be evaluated when new culture conditions are being implemented.

Bioactive tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza inhibit the growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in mice

Searching for efficacious and safe agents for the chemoprevention and therapy of prostate cancer has become the top priority of research. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of a group of tanshinones from a Chinese herb Salvia Miltiorrhiza, cryptotanshinone (CT), tanshinone IIA (T2A) and tanshinone I (T1) on prostate cancer. The in vitro studies showed that these tanshinones inhibited the growth of human prostate cancer cell lines in a dose-dependent manner via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction. Among three compounds, T1 had the most potent activity with IC(50) s around 3-6 μM. On the other hand, tanshinones had much less adverse effects on the growth of normal prostate epithelial cells. The epigenetic pathway focused array assay identified Aurora A kinase as a possible target of tanshinone actions. The expression of Aurora A was overexpressed in prostate cancer cell lines. Moreover, knockdown of Aurora A in prostate cancer cells significantly decreased cell growth. Tanshinones significantly downregulated the Aurora A expression, suggesting Aurora A may be a functional target of tanshinones. Tanshinones, especially T1, also showed potent anti-angiogenesis activity in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, T1 inhibited the growth of DU145 prostate tumor in mice associated with induction of apoptosis, decrease of proliferation, inhibition of angiogenesis and downregulation of Aurora A, whereas it did not alter food intake or body weight. Our results support that T1 may be an efficacious and safe chemopreventive or therapeutic agent against prostate cancer progression.

The mitotic kinase Aurora-A induces mammary cell migration and breast cancer metastasis by activating the Cofilin-F-actin pathway

The mitotic kinase Aurora-A (Aur-A) is required to form the bipolar spindle and ensure accurate chromosome segregation before cell division. Aur-A dysregulation represents an oncogenic event that promotes tumor formation. Here, we report that Aur-A promotes breast cancer metastasis. Aur-A overexpression enhanced mammary cell migration by dephosphorylation and activation of cofilin, which facilitates actin reorganization and polymerization. Cofilin knockdown impaired Aur-A-driven cell migration and protrusion of the cell membrane. Conversely, overexpression of activated cofilin abrogated the effects of Aur-A knockdown on cell migration. Moreover, Aur-A overexpession increased the expression of the cofilin phosphatase Slingshot-1 (SSH1), contributing to cofilin activation and cell migration. We found that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition blocked Aur-A-induced cofilin dephosphorylation, actin reorganization, and cell migration, suggesting crosstalk with PI3K signaling and a potential benefit of PI3K inhibition in tumors with deregulated Aur-A. Additionally, we found an association between Aur-A overexpression and cofilin activity in breast cancer tissues. Our findings indicate that activation of the cofilin-F-actin pathway contributes to tumor cell migration and metastasis enhanced by Aur-A, revealing a novel function for mitotic Aur-A kinase in tumor progression.

Phosphorylation and activation of androgen receptor by Aurora-A

Aurora-A kinase is frequently overexpressed/activated in various types of human malignancy, including prostate cancer. In this study, we demonstrate elevated levels of Aurora-A in androgen-refractory LNCaP-RF but not androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells, which prompted us to examine whether Aurora-A regulates the androgen receptor (AR) and whether elevated Aurora-A is involved in androgen-independent cell growth. We show that ectopic expression of Aurora-A induces AR transactivation activity in the presence and absence of androgen. Aurora-A interacts with AR and phosphorylates AR at Thr(282) and Ser(293) in vitro and in vivo. Aurora-A induces AR transactivation activity in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Ectopic expression of Aurora-A in LNCaP cells induces prostate-specific antigen expression and cell survival, whereas knockdown of Aurora-A sensitizes LNCaP-RF cells to apoptosis and cell growth arrest. These data indicate that AR is a substrate of Aurora-A and that elevated Aurora-A could contribute to androgen-independent cell growth by phosphorylation and activation of AR.

Biology of Aurora A kinase: implications in cancer manifestation and therapy

The Aurora A kinase belongs to serine/threonine group of kinases, well known for its role in cell cycle, especially in the regulation of mitosis. Numerous substrates of Aurora A kinase have been identified, which are predominantly related to cell cycle progression while some of them are transcription factors. Aurora A-mediated phosphorylation can either directly or indirectly regulate the function of its substrates. There are overwhelming evidences which report overexpression and gene amplification of Aurora A in several human cancers, and suggest that Aurora A could be a bona fide oncogene involved in tumorigenesis. Hence, Aurora A plays wide-ranging roles in both mitosis and its deregulation manifests in cancer progression. These observations have favored the choice of Aurora kinases as a target for cancer therapy. Recently, numerous small molecules have been discovered against Aurora kinases and many have entered clinical trials. Most of these small-molecule modulators designed are specific against either Aurora A or Aurora B, but some are dual inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding site which is highly conserved among the three human homologues of Aurora kinase. In this review, we discuss the physiological functions of Aurora A, interactions between Aurora A kinase and its cellular substrates, tumorigenesis mediated by Aurora A kinase upon overexpression, and small-molecule modulators of Aurora kinase as targets for cancer therapy.

Oncogenic role of nuclear accumulated Aurora-A

Aurora-A, also known as Aik, BTAK, or STK15, is a centrosomal serine/threonine protein kinase, which is proto-oncogenic and is overexpressed in a wide range of human cancers. Besides gene amplification and mRNA overexpression, proteolytic resistance mechanisms are thought to contribute to overexpression of Aurora-A. However, it is not yet clear how overexpressed Aurora-A affects the expression of transformed phenotype. Here, we found that nuclear accumulation of Aurora-A was critical for transformation activity. Cellular protein fractionation experiments and immunoblot analysis demonstrated a predominance of Aurora-A in the nuclear soluble fraction in head and neck cancer cells. Indirect immunofluorescence using confocal laser microscopy confirmed nuclear Aurora-A in head and neck cancer cells, while most oral keratinocytes exhibited only centrosomal localization. The expression of nuclear export signal-fused Aurora-A demonstrated that the oncogenic transformation activity was lost on disruption of the nuclear localization. Thus, the cytoplasmic localization of overexpressed Aurora-A previously demonstrated by immunohistochemical analysis is not likely to correspond to that in intact cancer cells. This study identifies an alternative mode of Aurora-A overexpression in cancer, through nuclear rather than cytoplasmic functions. We suggest that substrates of Aurora-A in the cell nuclear soluble fraction can represent a novel therapeutic target for cancer.

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation-element-binding protein (CPEB)1 and 2 bind to the HIF-1alpha mRNA 3'-UTR and modulate HIF-1alpha protein expression

The heterodimeric HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor)-1 is a transcriptional master regulator of several genes involved in mammalian oxygen homoeostasis. Besides the well described regulation of the HIF-1alpha subunit via hydroxylation-mediated protein stability in hypoxia, there are several indications of an additional translational control of the HIF-1alpha mRNA, especially after growth factor stimulation. We identified an interaction of CPEB (cytoplasmic polyadenylation-element-binding protein) 1 and CPEB2 with the 3'-UTR (untranslated region) of HIF-1alpha mRNA. Overexpression of CPEB1 and CPEB2 affected HIF-1alpha protein levels mediated by the 3'-UTR of HIF-1alpha mRNA. Stimulation of neuroblastoma SK-N-MC cells with insulin and thus activation of endogenous CPEBs increased the expression of a luciferase reporter gene fused to the 3'-UTR of HIF-1alpha as well as endogenous HIF-1alpha protein levels. This could be abrogated by treating the cells with CPEB1 or CPEB2 siRNAs (short interfering RNAs). Injection of HIF-1alpha cRNA into Xenopus oocytes verified the elongation of the poly(A)+ (polyadenylated) tail by cytoplasmic polyadenylation. Thus CPEB1 and CPEB2 are involved in the regulation of HIF-1alpha following insulin stimulation.

Aurora-A kinase nuclear expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Aurora-A kinase is a cell-cycle-regulating kinase required for chromosomal segregation. Overexpression of Aurora-A kinase has been shown to correlate with tumor proliferation and chromosomal instability. We investigated Aurora-A kinase expression in peripheral blood and bone marrow of 47 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients and 20 age-matched hematologically healthy subjects. Western blot analysis showed significantly higher Aurora-A levels in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (42 of 47) compared with lymphocytes of healthy subjects. However, Aurora-A mRNA expression in three chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients was similar to or lower than that of healthy control subjects. In 28 of 42 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with elevated Aurora-A kinase expression, one or more chromosomal abnormalities were detected, including trisomy 12 in 9 patients and deletion of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated gene in 9 patients. Aurora-A was also detected in all (100%) chronic lymphocytic leukemia cases by immunohistochemistry, with a nuclear staining pattern. The larger prolymphocytes and paraimmunoblasts showed stronger Aurora-A kinase expression than did small lymphocytes. In contrast, normal bone marrow reactive lymphocytes were negative for Aurora-A with positive histiocytes and immature myeloid cells. Immunostaining for acetylated histone H3 showed a nuclear pattern in all 38 chronic lymphocytic leukemia cases and double labeling showed coexpression of acetylated histone H3 and Aurora-A. In summary, Aurora-A kinase is overexpressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. The expression of acetylated histone H3 suggests that Aurora-A kinase may be active (functional). Thus, Aurora-A kinase overexpression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia may be involved in the genesis of chromosomal abnormalities and is a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

Aurora kinase inhibitors: identification and preclinical validation of their biomarkers

Aurora kinases are key regulators of mitosis and inhibitors being developed by a wide range of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the treatment of cancer. Tumor cells respond differentially on inhibition of different Aurora kinase family members and these differences have to be considered in the clinical development of small-molecule inhibitors with respect to the chosen indications, the schedules or the selection of appropriate end points and they should also guide the development of biomarkers. Preclinical validation of potential biomarkers for Aurora kinase inhibitors led to a first application in clinical trials, as exemplified for the phosphorylation of histone H3 to follow Aurora-B inhibition. This review discusses the criteria for translation into the clinic and the value of pharmacodynamic biomarkers and their potential, but also their limitations to be used as surrogate markers for clinical end points.

Tubulin-associated proteins: Aurora and Polo-like kinases as therapeutic targets in cancer

Tubulin is a very important target for cancer-fighting therapies; therefore, the cancer research community continues to adopt new ways of developing the therapeutic potential of tubulin and tubulin-associated proteins. Two families of tubulin-associated kinases, Aurora and Polo-like, have received significant attention regarding how they contribute to tumorigenesis and can be targeted with selective small molecule inhibitors. Aurora and Polo-like kinases play essential roles in centrosome separation, chromosome alignment and segregation, and cytokinesis. Inhibition of any of these kinases results in abnormal mitotic events (which vary depending on the particular family member) and eventually leads to apoptosis. Because of the biological consequences of inhibiting these kinases, several Aurora or Polo-like selective inhibitors have advanced to various stages of preclinical and clinical development; the most advanced are currently in phase 2 clinical trials.

Spatio-Temporal Expression Patterns of Aurora Kinases A, B, and C and Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation-Element-Binding Protein in Bovine Oocytes During Meiotic Maturation1

Maturation of immature bovine oocytes requires cytoplasmic polyadenylation and synthesis of a number of proteins involved in meiotic progression and metaphase-II arrest. Aurora serine-threonine kinases--localized in centrosomes, chromosomes, and midbody--regulate chromosome segregation and cytokinesis in somatic cells. In frog and mouse oocytes, Aurora A regulates polyadenylation-dependent translation of several mRNAs such as MOS and CCNB1, presumably by phosphorylating CPEB, and Aurora B phosphorylates histone H3 during meiosis. We analyzed the expression of three Aurora kinase genes--AURKA, AURKB, and AURKC--in bovine oocytes during meiosis by reverse transcription followed by quantitative real-time PCR and immunodetection. Aurora A was the most abundant form in oocytes, both at mRNA and protein levels. AURKA protein progressively accumulated in the oocyte cytoplasm during antral follicle growth and in vitro maturation. AURKB associated with metaphase chromosomes. AURKB, AURKC, and Thr-phosphorylated AURKA were detected at a contractile ring/midbody during the first polar body extrusion. CPEB, localized in oocyte cytoplasm, was hyperphosphorylated during prophase/metaphase-I transition. Most CPEB degraded in metaphase-II oocytes and remnants remained localized in a contractile ring. Roscovitine, U0126, and metformin inhibited meiotic divisions; they all induced a decrease of CCNB1 and phospho-MAPK3/1 levels and prevented CPEB degradation. However, only metformin depleted AURKA. The Aurora kinase inhibitor VX680 at 100 nmol/L did not inhibit meiosis but led to multinuclear oocytes due to the failure of the polar body extrusion. Thus, in bovine oocyte meiosis, massive destruction of CPEB accompanies metaphase-I/II transition, and Aurora kinases participate in regulating segregation of the chromosomes, maintenance of metaphase-II, and formation of the first polar body.

Aurora kinases and their inhibitors: more than one target and one drug

Dependent on the degree of inhibition of different Aurora kinase family members, various events in mitosis are affected, resulting in differential cellular responses. These different cellular responses have to be considered in the clinical development of the small molecule inhibitors with respect to the chosen indications, schedules and appropriate endpoints. Here the properties of the most advanced small molecule Aurora kinase inhibitors are compared and a case report on the development of PHA-739358 - a spectrum selective kinases inhibitor with a dominant phenotype of Aurora kinases inhibition, which is currently being tested in clinical trials - is discussed. One of the selection criteria for this compound was its property of inhibiting more than one cancer relevant target, such as Abl wild-type and the multidrug resistant Abl T315I mutant. This opens another path for clinical development in CML, and clinical trials are underway to evaluate the activity in patients suffering from chronic myelogenous leukemia, who developed resistance to currently approved treatments.

A novel method for poly(A) fractionation reveals a large population of mRNAs with a short poly(A) tail in mammalian cells

The length of the poly(A) tail of an mRNA plays an important role in translational efficiency, mRNA stability and mRNA degradation. Regulated polyadenylation and deadenylation of specific mRNAs is involved in oogenesis, embryonic development, spermatogenesis, cell cycle progression and synaptic plasticity. Here we report a new technique to analyse the length of poly(A) tails and to separate a mixed population of mRNAs into fractions dependent on the length of their poly(A) tails. The method can be performed on crude lysate or total RNA, is fast, highly reproducible and minor changes in poly(A) tail length distribution are easily detected. We validated the method by analysing mRNAs known to undergo cytoplasmic polyadenylation during Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation. We then separated RNA from NIH3T3 cells into two fractions with short and long poly(A) tails and compared them by microarray analysis. In combination with the validation experiments, the results indicate that ∼25% of the expressed genes have a poly(A) tail of less than 30 residues in a significant percentage of their transcripts.

MAPK interacts with XGef and is required for CPEB activation during meiosis in Xenopus oocytes

Meiotic progression in Xenopus oocytes, and all other oocytes investigated, is dependent on polyadenylation-induced translation of stockpiled maternal mRNAs. Early during meiotic resumption, phosphorylation of CPE-binding protein (CPEB) is required for polyadenylation-induced translation of mRNAs encoding cell cycle regulators. Xenopus Gef (XGef), a Rho-family guanine-exchange factor, influences the activating phosphorylation of CPEB. An exchange-deficient version of XGef does not, therefore implicating Rho-family GTPase function in early meiosis. We show here that Clostridium difficile Toxin B, a Rho-family GTPase inhibitor, does not impair early CPEB phosphorylation or progression to germinal vesicle breakdown, indicating that XGef does not influence these events through activation of a Toxin-B-sensitive GTPase. Using the inhibitors U0126 for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and ZM447439 for Aurora kinase A and Aurora kinase B, we found that MAPK is required for phosphorylation of CPEB, whereas Aurora kinases are not. Furthermore, we do not detect active Aurora kinase A in early meiosis. By contrast, we observe an early, transient activation of MAPK, independent of Mos protein expression. MAPK directly phosphorylates CPEB on four residues (T22, T164, S184, S248), but not on S174, a key residue for activating CPEB function. Notably, XGef immunoprecipitates contain MAPK, and this complex can phosphorylate CPEB. MAPK may prime CPEB for phosphorylation on S174 by an as-yet-unidentified kinase or may activate this kinase.

Interplay between RORgammat, Egr3, and E proteins controls proliferation in response to pre-TCR signals

The response of thymocytes to pre-T cell receptor (pre-TCR) signaling includes proliferation and gene rearrangement, two cellular processes that are incompatible. The control of proliferation by pre-TCR signals depends on the activities of the transcription factors RORgammat, Egr3, E12, and E47. Here, we describe a regulatory network in which interplay between these factors ensures transient proliferation that is temporally distinct from gene rearrangement. RORgammat expression was elevated after pre-TCR signaling, and RORgammat promoted gene rearrangement in CD4+, CD8+ cells by inhibiting cell division, promoting survival via Bcl-X(L), and inducing Rag2. Egr3 was transiently induced by pre-TCR signals and promoted a distinct proliferative phase by reducing E protein-dependent RORgammat expression and interacting with RORgammat to prevent induction of target genes. After Egr3 subsided, the expression and function of RORgammat increased. Thus, transient induction of Egr3 delays the effects of RORgammat and enables pre-TCR signaling to induce both proliferation and gene rearrangement.

Aurora A, mitotic entry, and spindle bipolarity

The kinase Aurora-A (Aur-A), which is enriched at centrosomes, is required for centrosome maturation and accurate chromosome segregation, and recent work implicates centrosomes as sites where the earliest activation of cyclin B1-cdc2 occurs. Here, we have used Xenopus egg extracts to investigate Aur-A's contribution to cell cycle progression and spindle morphology in the presence or absence of centrosomes. We find that addition of active Aur-A accelerates cdc2 activation and mitotic entry. Depletion of endogenous Aur-A or addition of inactive Aur-A, which lead to monopolar spindles, delays but does not block mitotic entry. These effects on timing and spindle structure do not require the presence of centrosomes or chromosomes. The catalytic domain alone of Aur-A is sufficient to restore spindle bipolarity; additional N-terminal sequences function in mitotic timing.