Orthopaedic surgery for inhibitor patients: a series of 27 procedures (25 patients)

Major Orthopaedic Surgery in Persons with Haemophilia A with and without Inhibitors Treated by Emicizumab: A Mid-Term, Large, and Successful Series at a Single Center

Introduction: Patients with Haemophilia (PWH) need orthopaedic treatments and often they undergo surgery. Classically, PWH with inhibitors have to face such procedures earlier than other patients. Major orthopaedic surgery is not easy and complications are frequent. Emicizumab is the first monoclonal antibody introduced for haematological prophylaxis for PWH with inhibitors, achieving an efficacious haemostasis also in patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors, later demonstrated for PWH without inhibitors. A few years ago, emicizumab was also proposed for PWH undergoing surgery, as it supports excellent bleeding control. The literature on orthopaedic surgery using an emicizumab protocol is scarce: only isolated case reports with short-term follow-ups are available. Aim: The purpose of this study is the assessment of the mid-term outcomes of major orthopaedic surgery performed in a population of patients with and without inhibitors and an emicizumab regimen. Methods: We reviewed the records of 13 PWH (eight with high-titre inhibitors, five without) with a mean age of 54.6 years, undergoing 15 orthopaedic surgical procedures between 2017 and 2022: primary knee and hip arthroplasty, revision, pseudotumor excision, or amputation. Their prophylaxis consisted of the combination of emicizumab and boluses of rFVIIa (PWH with inhibitors) or rFVIII (PWH without inhibitors). The clinical parameters of evaluation were: VAS, Haemophilic Joint Health Score (HJHS), and standard radiologic studies. Follow-up was conducted at 1, 3, 6 months, and then yearly. The survival rate of all implants was also assessed. Results: The mean follow-up was 38.8 months (range: 12-65). All patients were successfully treated without complications during surgery. During the postoperative period, a patient affected by a septic complication two months after his pseudotumor excision underwent an above-the-knee amputation. All patients were regularly discharged to the rehabilitative ward, reporting satisfaction for pain reduction and improved joint and global function at the VAS and HJHS scores. No revisions or implant failures were recorded. Conclusions: A prophylaxis regimen with emicizumab and factor replacement in PWH with or without inhibitors undergoing major orthopaedic surgery ensures effective bleeding control and good postoperative clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up, and may be routinely adopted in dedicated high-volume hospitals. This series is the most consistent to date reported at a single Haemophilia centre.

The value of radiosynoviorthesis for treatment of chronic synovitis in hemophilic joint disease

Chronic synovitis is contributing to the development of arthropathy in hemophilia A and B. In most patients with severe and moderate hemophilia, during lifetime, joint damage progresses despite early prophylaxis and intense treatment with coagulation factor concentrates. Recurrent hemorrhages into the joints and subclinical bleeding lead to chronic inflammation of the synovium, neoangiogenesis and remodeling, sustaining a vicious circle of bleeding-remodeling-bleeding and progression of osteochondral damage. Imaging techniques including ultrasound and MRI are able to early visualize synovitis and osteochondral changes. Early detection and sustained therapy of synovitis are important preconditions to prevent further deterioration of joint status. Chronic synovitis requires intensified substitution of coagulation factors and concomitant analgetic, antiphlogistic and physical therapy. The value of early radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) as effective method to control ongoing synovitis is discussed here. RSO is recommended as first choice therapy in case of persistant chronic synovitis, recorded in both national and international guidelines.

Joint replacement for the management of haemophilic arthropathy in patients with inhibitors: A long-term experience at a single Haemophilia centre

INTRODUCTION

The association between haemophilia and the so-called 'inhibitors', alloantibodies against the infused factor able to neutralize its clotting activity, is a very rare condition. Those sporadic patients suffer of an even more severe arthropathy and performing primary or revision arthroplasty become truly challenging. Literature about this topic is scarce, consisting in small case series, high rates of complications and mid-term follow-ups.

AIM

The purpose of this study is the assessment of the long-term outcomes of primary and revision arthroplasty performed in a population of patients with inhibitors, the more consistent to date reported at a single haemophilia centre.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 18 patients with inhibitors (26 procedures) between 1999 and 2017, divided in two groups. Group A [primary total Knee-Hip arthroplasty (TKA-THA)]: 13 patients underwent 19TKA and 2THA; and B (revision): 5 subjects underwent 3rTKA and 2rTHA. All patients received the same haematological prophylaxis (rFVIIa). Haemophilic Joint Health score and VAS, and X-rays were recorded pre- and postoperatively. The survival rate of all primary implants was assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 12.2 years (3-21) for group A, 8.6 years (4-12) for B. Few complications have been reported; the overall survival rate was 94.7% at 15 years. All patients reported satisfaction, pain reduction and improved functional ability.

CONCLUSION

Primary and revision TKA/THA in haemophilic subjects and inhibitors may be nowadays considered safe and effective if performed in dedicated multidisciplinary centres. The use of continuous infusion of rFVIIa showed an adequate haemostatic effect and low rate of complications. As expected, revisions are more prone to complications compared to primary arthroplasty.

Prophylaxis therapy with bypassing agents in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery: A cost analysis in Spain

Objectives

This study estimated the cost of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in surgical patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in Spain.

Methods

A decision‐analytic model was developed to estimate the cost to the Spanish National Health System of providing haemostatic coverage in this haemophilia population, with age distribution and average weight derived from the literature, and the annual number of surgeries (0.33 per patient) from local data. Drug costs were calculated from official ex‐factory prices with a 7.5% mandatory deduction and recommended dosing regimens.

Results

The estimated average costs per patient were €10 100.73 (aPCC) and €14 265.89 (rFVIIa) for dental extraction, €24 043.88 (aPCC) and €62 301.08 (rFVIIa) for minor surgery and €126 595.81 (aPCC) and €347 731.09 (rFVIIa) for major surgery. Assuming an estimated 23 annual surgeries in this population (N = 69), distributed as 19% dental extraction, 50% minor surgery and 31% major surgery, the total annual cost of prophylaxis was €1 209 682.35 with aPCC and €3 221 929.28 with rFVIIa.

Conclusions

aPCC costs were 62.5% lower than rFVIIa. Assuming potential clinical equivalence, aPCC is a potentially cost‐saving option for surgical patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors.

Over two decades of orthopaedic surgery in patients with inhibitors-Quantifying the complication of bleeding

Patients with haemophilia who have developed inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX present a significant concern to those surgeons who operate on them. The evidence base for bypassing agents such as recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrate has amassed over several decades. The literature is open to positive interpretation on the successful use of these agents in the treatment of inhibitor-positive patients. However, there are equally persistent concerns amongst surgeons, in particular orthopaedic surgeons, regarding the high complication rate of bleeding. To explore and quantify this concern, we present a literature review spanning two decades of publications on haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Irrespective of the progress made with haemostatic protocols, trepidation on embarking on surgery is valid. The high risk of bleeding is a function of the inherent complexity of the disease and rightfully translates into difficulties in its management. Combined with the prospect of orthopaedic surgery, those involved in the care of such patients are justified in their continued anxiety and diligence when considering the benefits in quality of life against the prevalent complications.

Thromboembolic event rate in patients exposed to anti-inhibitor coagulant complex: a meta-analysis of 40-year published data

Anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (AICC), an activated prothrombin complex concentrate, has been available for the treatment of patients with inhibitors since 1977, and thromboembolic events (TEEs) have been reported after infusion of AICC in patients with congenital or acquired hemophilia. With the aim of estimating the TEE incidence rate (IR) related to AICC exposure in these patients, a systematic review of the literature was carried out in Medline, according to PRISMA guidelines, from inception date to March 2017. The IR of TEEs was estimated through a meta-analytic approach by using a generalized linear mixed model based on a Poisson distribution. Thirty-nine studies were included (1980-2016). Overall, 46 TEEs were reported; of these, 13 were reported as disseminated intravascular coagulations, 11 as myocardial infarctions, and 3 as thrombotic cerebrovascular accidents. The pooled TEE IR was 2.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-25.40) per 100 000 AICC infusions (5.42 in retrospective studies [95% CI, 0.92-31.82]; 1.09 in prospective studies [95% CI, 0.01-238.77]). The TEE rate was 5.09 (95% CI, 0.01-1795.60) per 100 000 AICC infusions administered on demand, whereas no TEEs were reported with prophylaxis. Interestingly, the estimated IR in patients with congenital hemophilia was <0.01 per 100 000 infusions. These findings provide robust evidence of safety of AICC over almost 40 years of published studies.

Major and Minor Classifications for Surgery in People With Hemophilia: A Literature Review

Agents that control bleeding and the usage of bypassing agents have made surgery an option to consider in people with hemophilia. However, the lack of consistent definitions for major or minor surgery may lead to inconsistencies in patient management. This literature review has evaluated how surgical procedures in people with hemophilia were categorized as major or minor surgery and assessed the consistency across publications. After screening 926 potentially relevant articles, 547 were excluded and 379 full-text articles were reviewed. Ninety-five articles categorized major or minor surgical procedures; of these, 35 publications categorized three or more major or minor surgical procedures and were included for analysis. Seven (20%) publications provided varying criteria for defining major or minor surgery, five of which defined surgery according to the level of surgical invasiveness. Across all 35 publications, there was considerable variance in the categorization of major and minor surgical procedures and some overlap in surgical nomenclature (eg, type of synovectomy, arthroscopy, and central venous access device insertion/removals). The lack of consistent guidance when referring to major or minor surgery in people with hemophilia needs to be addressed. Clear and consistent definitions, achieved by consensus and promoted by relevant international hemophilia committees, are desirable, to provide guidance on appropriate treatment, to increase the accuracy of trial data and may confound the interpretation of surgical outcomes.

The role of recombinant activated factor VII in the haematological management of elective orthopaedic surgery in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors

The clinical profile and expectations of haemophilic patients with inhibitors have changed over the last three decades, mainly because of the prolongation of life-expectancy, often resulting in an increase of the orthopaedic burden. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is the most frequently used bypassing agent in haemophilia patients with inhibitors during elective orthopaedic surgery. For nearly 30 years, rFVIIa has been successfully used to control haemostasis in several major and minor surgical procedures. Clinical trials, case series, reports and surveys were progressively aimed at optimising rFVIIa usage in very demanding conditions managed in highly specialised centres. Recommendations from consensus opinions and guidelines have been provided on the basis of this clinical experience.

Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in haemophilia treatment that have allowed patients to take greater control of their disease. However, the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the greatest complication of the disease and a challenge in the treatment of haemophilia making management of bleeding episodes difficult and surgical procedures very challenging. A meeting to discuss the unmet needs of haemophilia patients with inhibitors was held in Paris on 20 November 2014. Topics discussed were genetic and non-genetic risk factors for the development of inhibitors, immunological aspects of inhibitor development, FVIII products and inhibitor development, generation and functional properties of engineered antigen-specific T regulatory cells, suppression of immune responses to FVIII, prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, epitope mapping of FVIII inhibitors, current controversies in immune tolerance induction therapy, surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and future perspectives for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A summary of the key points discussed is presented in this paper.

Total knee replacement in patients with haemophilia: the Scottish experience

INTRODUCTION

Patients with haemophilia commonly develop arthropathy secondary to recurrent haemarthroses. Although modern treatment with replacement coagulation factors has reduced the prevalence of end-stage arthropathy, total joint replacement is still required in a small group of patients. These patients may be at higher risk of complications and the outcome of surgery may not be comparable to reports of outcomes of total joint replacement in the general population. The purpose of this study was to describe the change in function in patients undergoing total knee replacement for haemophilic arthropathy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a tertiary centre had prospective evaluations of patient reported outcome measures and range of movement. Their post-operative function was evaluated in a combined orthopaedic-haematology clinic. Eight male patients underwent 13 total knee replacements from 1999 to 2007 and were followed up for a median of 78 months (range 17-116).

RESULTS

The median Oxford knee score improved from 45.5 pre-operatively to 28 (p = 0.049). There was a similar improvement in SF-12 physical (p = 0.017) and Knee Society scores (objective p = 0.001; function p = 0.002). Four total knee replacements were performed in patients with inhibitor antibodies and were treated with recombinant activated factor VIIa. These patients had reduced range of movement (p = 0.047). No patients suffered deep infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Total knee replacement in patients with haemophiliac arthropathy resulted in improvement in range of movement and function. The presence of factor VIII inhibitors resulted in reduced range of movement, but similar patient reported outcome measures.

Elective orthopaedic surgery for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: single centre experience of 40 procedures and review of the literature

With the introduction of safe and effective factor VIII/IX-bypassing agents--recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrates (pd-APCC)--elective orthopaedic surgery (EOS) is a viable option for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. We report a series of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors undergoing EOS between 1997 and 2008 using bypassing agents to provide haemostatic cover. All inhibitor patients undergoing EOS and receiving rFVIIa, plasma-derived prothrombin complex concentrates (pd-PCC) or pd-APCC as haemostatic cover were included. Patients were operated on by the same surgeon and were managed by the same haemophilia treatment centre. Forty procedures (25 minor and 15 major) were conducted in 18 patients. Twenty-one minor cases were covered using rFVIIa, three with pd-PCC, and one with pd-APCC; all major cases were covered using rFVIIa. Bleeding was no greater than expected compared with a non-haemophilic population in all 25 minor procedures. In the major procedure group, there was no excessive bleeding in 40% of cases (6/15) and bleeding completely stopped in response to rFVIIa. For the remaining nine cases, bleeding response to rFVIIa was described as 'markedly decreased' or 'decreased' in 4/15 cases and 'unchanged' in 5/15 cases. Overall, efficacy of rFVIIa, based on final patient outcome, was 85%. One death occurred as a result of sepsis secondary to necrotizing fasciitis. Good control of haemostasis can be achieved with bypassing agents in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing minor EOS; rFVIIa was used as an effective bypassing agent, enabling EOS in patients undergoing minor and major procedures.

Surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, with special emphasis on orthopaedics: Madrid experience

We report on a series of 92 surgical procedures (90 patients). It includes 35 orthopaedic procedures (33 patients) and 57 non-orthopaedic procedures (57 patients). The orthopaedic procedures include 27 radiosynovectomies (minor surgery) and eight major orthopaedic procedures. The non-orthopaedic procedures include 52 minor interventions and five major procedures. The average age of patients was 34 years (range: 8-56), and the average follow-up time was 3 years (range: 1-6). Of the 92 surgical procedures, 42 were performed with activated prothrombin complex concentrates [factor eight inhibitor bypassing agent (FEIBA)] and 47 with recombinant-activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Regarding FEIBA treatment in minor surgery, the initial dose was 100 IU kg(-1). After 6 h, we continued with 50 IU kg(-1) every 12 h for at least 4 days (radiosynovectomies). In minor non-orthopaedic procedures, the dose was continued until day 14. In patients who underwent surgery with the haemostatic control achieved by means of rFVIIa, the initial dose of rFVIIa in minor procedures (both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic) was 90-120 microg kg(-1). In postoperative days 1-5, the dose was 2-4 x 90-120 microg kg(-1) q3-6 h for 24 h. In major procedures (both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic), the dose was 120 microg kg(-1) pre-operatively, 120 microg kg(-1) q 3 h day 2/day 3-5, and then 90-120 microg kg(-1) q 6 h until day 14. There were 87 good results, four fair results and one poor result. Our study has shown that haemophilic patients with inhibitors requiring surgery can undergo orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic procedures with a high expectation of success. In other words, surgery (orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic) is now possible in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, leading to an improved quality of life for these patients.

Successful major and minor surgery using factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors

Surgeries are being increasingly performed in patients with haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors. Optimal bypassing agent regimens need further delineation. Data pertaining to surgeries from 1989 to 2004 at a single centre were retrospectively analysed. Patients received a standardized factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) dose for both major and minor elective or emergency surgeries. The standard FEIBA dose was 70 U kg(-1) per infusion. FEIBA was infused at 9 and 1 h before and 8 h after operation. Infusions were routinely repeated every 8 h afterward. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed on the basis of blood loss, occurrence of haematoma and transfusion requirements. Seven adult patients underwent a total of 12 operations: 10 major and two minor. Ten procedures were elective. The median cumulative numbers of infusions and days of therapy were 46 and 17, respectively. Cumulative total FEIBA consumption was a median of 3185 U kg(-1). Observed blood losses, haematoma incidence and transfusion requirements were comparable to those expected for noncoagulopathic patients undergoing similar procedures. The only large haematoma occurred after a hip prosthesis operation and resolved under continuing FEIBA treatment. There were no cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation or other thromboembolic complications. FEIBA provides an effective and safe first-line peri- and postoperative haemostatic therapy for patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, allowing both major and minor operations to be successfully performed.

Controversies and challenges in elective orthopedic surgery in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors

Until recently, orthopedic surgery was strongly contraindicated in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. However, recent advances in our knowledge of bypassing agents (particularly recombinant activated factor VII [rFVIIa]) that provide effective surgical hemostasis have allowed us to successfully perform major orthopedic procedures in these patients. Adequate hemostasis during surgery and postoperative rehabilitation is crucial, as development of a wound hematoma may jeopardize long-term outcomes. It also should be noted that success depends not only on appropriate drug therapy but also on preoperative preparations and adequate perioperative surveillance. Preoperative assessment of vascular status is very important, and strong motivation--on the part of the patient, the surgeon, and the hematologist--is needed to ensure a satisfactory result. Although inhibitor patients undergoing surgery face a higher risk of bleeding and other complications than their non-inhibitor counterparts, outcomes are generally good if a multidisciplinary team approach is applied.