Cytotoxic herpes simplex type 2-specific, DQ0602-restricted CD4 T+-cell clones show alloreactivity to DQ0601

Donor-derived CD4(+)/CCR7(+) T-cell partial selective depletion does not alter acquired anti-infective immunity

In previous studies, we observed that a high proportion of donor-derived CD4(+) T cells expressing the chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) was a major determinant of acute GVHD, without interfering with the incidence of other post-transplant outcomes, especially relapse and nonrelapse mortality rates. Here, we investigated in vitro the impact of partially selective CD4(+)/CCR7(+) T lymphocytes on acquired anti-infective immune response in 10 donors who underwent G-CSF-primed PBSC collection. Similar quantitative and functional proliferative reactions were observed in lymphocyte cultures in the presence of adenovirus and pp65 Ags with unmanipulated and partially depleted donor samples. No responses were observed in the presence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 used as a negative control. These results complete the proof of concept needed to build a clinical trial investigating partially selective CD4(+)/CCR7(+) T cell-depleted allo-SCT.

Alloreactivity across HLA barriers is mediated by both naïve and antigen-experienced T cells

T cell responses to allogeneic targets arise predominantly from the naïve pool. However, in humans, the risk of graft-versus-host disease is increased if the donor has circulating T cells recognizing multiple persistent DNA viruses, suggesting that memory T cells also contribute to the alloresponse. To examine HLA alloreactivity, we used flow cytometry-based proliferation and cytokine production assays. We identified the clonal identity of virus-specific T cells cross-reacting with HLA-disparate targets by sequencing the T cell receptor β chains in virus-specific T cell lines restimulated with cognate and HLA-disparate targets and sorting these chains according to cytokine response. We confirmed that naïve T cells from cord blood and adult individuals responded to HLA-mismatched target cells. In addition, in adults, we identified memory T cells responding by cytokine release to HLA-mismatched targets both in direct assays and after 8 days of culture with allogeneic stimulator cells. Epstein-Barr virus-specific and cytomegalovirus-specific T cells, tested against a panel of 30 T cell antigen-presenting cells with a broad coverage of the most prominent HLA types, displayed specificity for certain mismatched HLA alleles. Sequencing of the T cell receptor β chain demonstrated a clonotypic identity of cells that responded to both viral and allogeneic stimulation. These findings show conclusively that alloresponses in humans are not confined to the naïve T cell subset, and that memory viral antigen-specific T cells can cross-react with specific mismatched HLA-peptide complexes not presenting with cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus peptides.

Comparative analysis of naïve and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets in bone marrow and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell allografts: impact of donor characteristics

OBJECTIVE

Donor T cells expressing lymph node homing receptors are the foremost initiators of acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD), and a high proportion of CD4(+)CCR7(+) T cells in human leukocyte antigen-matched allografts has been shown to confer a high risk of aGVHD without interfering in other outcomes.

METHODS

Naïve, central memory (T(CM)), effector memory (T(EM)), and terminally differentiated effector memory (T(TD)) subsets, further subdivided by CD28 expression, were compared in 52 bone marrow and 37 granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood harvests.

RESULTS

CCR7(+) cells (naïve and T(CM)) predominated in the CD4(+) population, whereas CD8(+) memory cells were chiefly CCR7(neg) in the grafts. Donor age, antecedent of chronic infections, and graft type were independent factors influencing graft composition. CD8(+) naïve cells negatively correlated and CD8(+) T(EM) positively correlated with age. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity was associated with more CD8(+) T(TD) and diminished CD28 expression. Toxoplasmosis seropositivity was associated with more CD4(+) T(CM) (p = 0.021). Marrow grafts comprised more CD28(+) cells within CD8(+) T(TD), but the percentage of CD4(+)CCR7(+) cells did not differ significantly between the two graft sources. Each of the four CD4(+) subsets and the percentage of CD4(+)CCR7(+) cells (p < 0.001) were correlated between graft and venous blood analyzed in 42 donors before harvest procedures.

CONCLUSION

This study provides reference values for CD4(+) and CD8(+) naïve and memory subsets within allografts applicable to the healthy donor population and indicates that beforehand analysis of a whole-blood sample can help evaluating the risk of aGVHD conferred by each donor and, when possible, choosing the one conferring the lowest risk.