Ultrasonic root-end preparation, Part 2. Microleakage of EBA root-end fillings

Comparison of crack formation induced by ultrasonic tips and burs during root-end preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction The main objective of root canal treatment is to achieve apical seal. Crack formation during root-end preparation promotes bacterial penetration, thereby leading to failure. This systematic review aims to examine the literature and summarise studies that compare the crack formation induced by ultrasonic tips and burs during root-end preparation.Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis were reported and conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The online databases PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used for data search. In vitro and ex vivo studies conducted up to March 2021 in the English language were included in the review. The risk of bias in the present study was assessed using a customised tool. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, χ² values and I² values were used to assess statistical heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software Version 5.4.Results A total of 317 records were found from all of the databases and one article was added following hand-searching. Twelve articles were included in the study after the application of the eligibility criteria of which ten articles were included for the meta-analysis. Nine studies showed a medium risk of bias while three studies showed a high risk of bias. The analysis of the crack formation showed a statistically significant difference between the ultrasonic tip and the bur (P = 0.0002). The odds ratio was 2.72 (1.60, 4.65) with a confidence interval of 95% suggesting higher odds of crack formation in the ultrasonic group.Conclusion This review concludes that ultrasonic root-end preparation resulted in higher crack formation than burs.

Effects of ultrasonic refinement on endodontic access cavity walls: A microcomputed tomography analysis

Objectives

The present study aimed in assessing the coronal defects after access cavity finishing and refinement by micro.

Methods

Access cavities on thirty molars were prepared using a diamond bur. To finish and refine the access cavity, the Endo-Z was used in group 1 (n=15) and Start X 1 in group 2. Preparation time was recorded. A micro-CT scan was done before and after access preparation. Formation and location of the new defects were registered, the extension of defects calculated and the direction of the extension registered, preparation time and surface roughness determined (P < 0.05).

Results

Preparation time was significantly higher with ultrasonics (P <0.001). Internal walls showed smoother surfaces for Endo-Z group. Newly counts and extension length of defects weren't significantly different between groups (P > .05).

Conclusion

Ultrasonic tips induced new cracks. Both instruments caused the extension of cracks. Ultrasonic tips requires more time and results in significantly rougher surfaces.

A Novel Self-Mineralizing Antibacterial Tissue Repair Varnish to Condition Root-end Dentin in Endodontic Microsurgery

INTRODUCTION

A novel 2-part varnish system containing chitosan nanoparticles (part 1) and chitosan-grafted hydroxyapatite precursor nanocomplex (part 2) was developed to condition the root-end dentin using the principle of biomineralization while rendering both antimicrobial efficacy and bioactivity. This in vitro study aimed to characterize and assess the effectiveness of the chitosan nanoparticles and chitosan-grafted hydroxyapatite precursor nanocomplex containing self-mineralizing antibacterial tissue repair varnish to condition as well as seal root-end dentin during endodontic microsurgery.

METHODS

In phase 1, the antibacterial properties and cellular response of the varnish were characterized. The antibacterial activity and cellular responses were evaluated using Enterococcus faecalis and periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts, respectively. In phase 2, a resected root-end model was used to apply the 2-part varnish and examine the dentin-varnish interface using transmission electron microscopy. The percentage of root end sealed with time was determined using scanning electron microscopy (n = 6/time point). Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way analysis of variance where applicable.

RESULTS

The part 1 and 2 of the varnish displayed significant antibacterial activity and reduced bacterial adherence/survival (P < .01). The attachment and spreading of PDL fibroblasts on the varnish-conditioned dentin was enhanced compared with unconditioned dentin (P < .01). In the resected root-end model, the 2-part varnish displayed a biomineralized varnish layer with close interaction with the subsurface dentin. Root-end coverage with the biomineralized layer increased with incubation time (P < .01), reaching approximately 95% coverage after 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-part varnish system effectively conditioned/sealed the root end with a biomineralized layer while reducing bacterial load and promoting PDL fibroblast attachment. This therapeutic modification of root-end dentin could provide optimal conditions to enhance healing and improve prognosis in teeth with root-end cracks after endodontic microsurgery.

Retrograde Instrumentation of Surgically Resected Roots Using Controlled Memory Files: A Human Cadaver Study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the amount of residual obturation material of retroinstrumented surgically resected roots using controlled memory files and to evaluate the incidence of adverse treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty maxillary anterior teeth in human cadavers were selected, and nonsurgical root canal treatment was performed on these teeth. A standardized 4-mm osteotomy and a 3-mm root resection with as close to 0° bevel as possible were made on each tooth. A microsurgical diamond tip was used to create a 1- to 2-mm starting point for each retropreparation. A 25/06 and 30/06 VTaper 2H were bent at about 90° angle to mimic the clinical and anatomic restrictions and used to create a retropreparation to a depth of 14 mm. Micro-computed tomography scans were taken and analyzed for volume and percentage of residual obturation material at 5 and 10 mm. In addition, the incidences of instrument separation and crack and ledge formation in the teeth were recorded.

RESULTS

The median volume of residual obturation at 5 and 10 mm was 0.18 mm³ (interquartile range, 0.36 mm³) and 1.97 mm³ (interquartile range, 1.99 mm³), respectively. The overall incidence of file separation during retropreparation was 13.33% (4/30). Among the cases analyzed with micro-computed tomography, none showed crack or ledge formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroinstrumentation of surgically resected roots using controlled memory files cleans the canal effectively with relatively low adverse treatment outcomes. Although this novel technique is limited in application, it is a safe and effective way to achieve a deep, clean retropreparation.

Effect of ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation on dentinal microcrack formation: A micro-computed tomography study

Background:

Root-end preparation during surgical endodontics may produce dentinal microcrack formation and/or propagation, leading to vertical root fractures.

Aim:

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the microcrack formation and propagation during ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation, with diamond- and zirconium nitride-coated tips using micro-computed tomography (CT).

Methodology:

Twenty-eight extracted, mature, free-of-defect, mandibular premolars were decoronated and micro-CT scanned for the presence of preexisting microcracks. Samples were prepared till F4, were obturated, and were re-scanned to determine an increase in the number of microcracks. After 3 mm of root-end resection, the samples were randomly divided for ultrasonic root-end preparation into Group 1 (n = 12): preparation was done with ProUltra Surg tip, Group 2 (n = 12): preparation was done with KiS tip, and Group 3 (n = 4): no preparation was done. The samples were rescanned, and data collected were analyzed using ANOVA and Student's t-test. The level of significance was set at 5%.

Results:

Preexisting microcracks were observed in few samples. The mean percentage number increase of microcracks after root-end preparation in ProUltra Surg group was 1.25 and in KiS group, it was 0.5. The difference in mean percentage increase for the number of microcracks after root-end cavity preparation using ProUltra Surg tip and KiS tip was 0.75. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.34).

Conclusion:

Both diamond- and zirconium nitride-coated ultrasonic tips resulted in more number of dentinal crack formation and propagation when preexisting cracks were present.

Effects of Ultrasonic Removal of Fractured Files from the Middle Third of Root Canals on the Resistance to Vertical Root Fracture

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyze the effects of ultrasonic removal of fractured files from the middle third of root canals on the vertical root fracture resistance.

METHODS

This study was an extension of a previous study assessing the effects of fractured file removal on dentinal microcracks. It included 18 bilaterally matched pairs of human mandibular incisors prepared and analyzed in the previous study. Briefly, 1 member of each pair was assigned to an ultrasonic or a control group. In the ultrasonic group, K-files were fractured in the middle third of canals followed by ultrasonic file removal and canal preparation. In the control group, the root canals were simply prepared. Micro-computed tomographic imaging was performed before and after treatment, and the cross-sectional root images were screened for microcracks. For the present study, 3-dimensional reconstruction was performed for volumetric assessments. The fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. All data were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Fracture loads were significantly smaller in the ultrasonic group (P < .05). The percentage increase in the canal volume significantly influenced the root fracture resistance (P < .05), whereas microcracks had no significant effect (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonic removal of fractured instruments from the middle third of root canals lowers the vertical root fracture resistance, with increased dentin removal being the primary cause.

Crack Formation Following Root-End Preparation in Roots with the Butterfly Effect

Objective:

To investigate apical cracks in roots that exhibit the butterfly effect and that have undergone apical resection and ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation. The effect of the obturation material was also studied.

Methods:

Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were decoronated at the cemento-enamel junction. Roots were viewed under a light microscope and coded according to the presence or absence of the butterfly effect. Canals were prepared using ProTaper Next instruments to size X3 and assigned to two obturation groups (gutta-percha and AH Plus, and ProRoot MTA alone). Each contained twenty roots (10 with the butterfly effect and 10 without the butterfly effect). Roots were resected perpendicular to their long axis, 3 mm from the apex, and cavities were cut using ultrasonic retrotips. Resin replicas were used for crack imaging from scanning electron micrographs. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results:

Cracks occurred more frequently in teeth with the butterfly effect (80%), with this difference being significant (P=0.001). Most cracks (73%) ran buccolingually. Teeth obturated with MTA developed fewer cracks compared to those obturated with GP and sealer.

Conclusion:

Root-ends with the butterfly effect had a significantly higher number of buccolingual cracks following resection and ultrasonic root-end preparation. This might explain the development of some vertical root fractures, which usually run buccolingually. Canal obturation with MTA may be protective.

Incidence of Apical Crack Initiation during Canal Preparation using Hand Stainless Steel (K-File) and Hand NiTi (Protaper) Files

Aim

To evaluate the incidence of apical crack initiation during canal preparation with stainless steel K-files and hand protaper files (in vitro study).

Materials and methods

Sixty extracted mandibular premo-lar teeth are randomly selected and embedded in an acrylic tube filled with autopolymerizing resin. A baseline image of the apical surface of each specimen was recorded under a digital microscope (80×). The cervical and middle thirds of all samples were flared with #2 and #1 Gates-Glidden (GG) drills, and a second image was recorded. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 teeth each according to the file type (hand K-file and hand-protaper) and working length (WL) (instrumented at WL and 1 mm less than WL). Final image after dye penetration and photomicrograph of the apical root surface were digitally recorded.

Results

Maximum numbers of cracks were observed with hand protaper files compared with hand K-file at the WL and 1 mm short of WL. Chi-square testing revealed a highly significant effect of WL on crack formation at WL and 1 mm short of WL (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

Minimum numbers of cracks at WL and 1 mm short of WL were observed with hand K-file and maximum with hand protaper files.

How to cite this article

Soni D, Raisingani D, Mathur R, Madan N, Visnoi S. Incidence of Apical Crack Initiation during Canal Preparation using Hand Stainless Steel (K-File) and Hand NiTi (Protaper) Files. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(4):303-307.

Cutting efficiency of apical preparation using ultrasonic tips with microprojections: confocal laser scanning microscopy study

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the cutting efficiency of a newly developed microprojection tip and a diamond-coated tip under two different engine powers.

Materials and Methods

The apical 3-mm of each root was resected, and root-end preparation was performed with upward and downward pressure using one of the ultrasonic tips, KIS-1D (Obtura Spartan) or JT-5B (B&L Biotech Ltd.). The ultrasonic engine was set to power-1 or -4. Forty teeth were randomly divided into four groups: K1 (KIS-1D / Power-1), J1 (JT-5B / Power-1), K4 (KIS-1D / Power-4), and J4 (JT-5B / Power-4). The total time required for root-end preparation was recorded. All teeth were resected and the apical parts were evaluated for the number and length of cracks using a confocal scanning micrscope. The size of the root-end cavity and the width of the remaining dentin were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and a Mann-Whitney test.

Results

There was no significant difference in the time required between the instrument groups, but the power-4 groups showed reduced preparation time for both instrument groups (p < 0.05). The K4 and J4 groups with a power-4 showed a significantly higher crack formation and a longer crack irrespective of the instruments. There was no significant difference in the remaining dentin thickness or any of the parameters after preparation.

Conclusions

Ultrasonic tips with microprojections would be an option to substitute for the conventional ultrasonic tips with a diamond coating with the same clinical efficiency.

Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillings

AIM

(i) To evaluate the incidence of microcracks around root-end preparations completed with ultrasonic tips and their relationship with the root filling technique and thickness of surrounding dentine. (ii) To investigate the effect of rapid exposure to a water-soluble dye of Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), Super Ethoxybenzoic Acid (sEBA) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), on the marginal adaptation and microleakage of root-end fillings. (iii) To describe the microstructure of the surface of root-end filling materials.

METHODOLOGY

Ninety-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups (n = 46) according to the root canal instrumentation/filling techniques. Group 1 consisted of specimens in which canal preparation was completed using a crown-down technique and then filled with the Thermafil system (TF group); Group 2 consisted of specimens in which canal preparation was completed using a step-back technique and lateral condensation (LC group). Following root-end resection and ultrasonic cavity preparation, the samples were further divided into three subgroups (n = 24) for root-end filling with IRM, sEBA or MTA. The ultrasonic preparation time was recorded. Eight teeth were kept as positive and 12 as negative controls. Following immersion in Indian ink for 7 days, all resected root surfaces were evaluated for the presence of microcracks and the cross-sectional area of root-end surface and root-end filling were measured to evaluate the thickness of the dentinal walls. Thereafter, the samples were sectioned longitudinally so as to assess the depth of dye penetration and marginal adaptation of root-end fillings. Negative controls longitudinally sectioned were used to describe microstructural characteristics of the root-end filling materials using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) techniques.

RESULTS

Although the thickness of dentinal walls between groups 1 and 2 was similar, the ultrasonic preparation time and number of microcracks were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the TF group. Both groups had a significant correlation between microcracks and ultrasonic preparation time (P < 0.001). sEBA and IRM had better adaptation and less leakage compared with MTA. A SEM analysis displayed microstructural differences between the root-end filling materials.

CONCLUSION

Microcracks can occur independently of the thickness of dentinal walls and may be associated with the prolonged ultrasonic preparation time required for the removal of the root filling during root-end cavity preparation. Although sEBA and IRM had better behaviour than MTA regarding microleakage and marginal adaptation, it is possible that exposure of MTA to a water-soluble dye before achieving full set and its porous microstructure contributed to the results.

Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts and Practice: A Review

Endodontic surgery has now evolved into endodontic microsurgery. By using state-of-the-art equipment, instruments and materials that match biological concepts with clinical practice, we believe that microsurgical approaches produce predictable outcomes in the healing of lesions of endodontic origin. In this review we attempted to provide the most current concepts, techniques, instruments and materials with the aim of demonstrating how far we have come. Our ultimate goal is to assertively teach the future generation of graduate students and also train our colleagues to incorporate these techniques and concepts into everyday practice.

SEM analysis of the integrity of resected root apices of cadaver and extracted teeth after ultrasonic root-end preparation at different intensities

AIM

To compare the integrity of root apices of cadaver and extracted teeth after resection, ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation at medium and low ultrasonic power settings and retrieval.

METHODOLOGY

Root canal treatment, perpendicular root-end resection and root-end preparation were performed on single-rooted anterior and premolar teeth (49 teeth in situ in maxillary and mandibular jaws from cadavers and 45 extracted teeth). Apical root-end cavities were prepared with the S12/90 degrees D tip and the Suni-Max ultrasonic unit (Satelec, Merignac, France) at the intensity prescribed by the manufacturer (power 7 at power mode S) (34 cadaver teeth, 30 extracted teeth) and at a lower intensity (power 4 at power mode S) (15 cadaver teeth, 15 extracted teeth). After ultrasonic preparation the cadaver teeth were retrieved from the jaws. Exaflex impressions (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) were made of the root apices after resection, root-end preparation and retrieval. These impressions were processed for SEM analysis, and the recordings evaluated for cracks and marginal chipping.

RESULTS

In general, extracted teeth showed significantly more cracks and chipping than cadaver teeth. Lowering the ultrasonic power from medium to low intensity resulted in equal scores for cracks on extracted teeth and for chipping on cadaver teeth, in higher scores for cracks on cadavers and in lower scores for chipping on extracted teeth. Complete cracks and cracks originating from the root surface occurred only in extracted teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of cracks and degree of chipping caused by ultrasonic root-end preparation was higher on extracted teeth than on cadaver teeth. Lowering the ultrasonic power from medium to low intensity cannot be recommended as it resulted in more cracks and equal chipping on cadaver teeth. Investigation of techniques and materials should be conducted in situ and not on extracted teeth.

Effects of ultrasonic root end preparation on resected root surfaces: SEM evaluation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vitro effect of ultrasonic retrotips on root end surfaces.

STUDY DESIGN

Root end resection was performed on 45 single-root teeth endodontically treated after extraction. Setting the ultrasonic device at full power, a retrograde cavity was made by a stainless steel tip in 9 specimens (SS-FP). In another 9 samples a diamond tip was used (D-FP). Setting the intensity of the ultrasonic device at half power, 9 specimens were treated using stainless steel tips (SS-HP) and 9 using diamond tip (D-HP). Nine teeth were only apically resected and used as controls. Histologic serial sections were examined by scanning electron microsope to assess the number of root-face cracking, the marginal quality, and the crack type.

RESULTS

No significant difference between diamond and stainless steel groups was found at a given power setting. Significant differences were found between SS-FP and SS-HP group for both the number of cracks and the marginal quality.

Identification of Resected Root-End Dentinal Cracks: A Comparative Study of Transillumination and Dyes

The dilemma of diagnosing and possibly treating dentinal cracks continues to present a challenge in endodontics. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of transillumination and dyes in identifying root-end dentinal cracks. Fifty maxillary central incisors were decoronated, and the canals were instrumented to an ISO size 50 at the working length. The apical 3 mm of the roots was resected, and cracks were artificially created in the apical dentin. Four independent examiners evaluated the root ends at x8 magnification with a surgical operating microscope using transillumination (group 1), sodium fluorescein dye (group 2), caries detect dye (group 3), methylene blue dye (group 4), and methylene blue plus transillumination (group 5). The examiners' ability to identify root ends correctly with and without cracks was analyzed by comparing the data with the predetermined standard (cracked and noncracked) using logistic regression analysis. All techniques used were shown to be more effective than random chance at diagnosing cracks. The areas under the curve of the different techniques were as follows: transillumination, 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.93); sodium fluorescein, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58-0.86); caries detector, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89); methylene blue, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55-0.84); and methylene blue plus transillumination, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.94). Thus, the crack assessment techniques that gave the best discrimination between cracked and noncracked specimens, regardless of rater, was methylene blue plus transillumination. This study emphasizes the usefulness of transillumination along with magnification in detecting dentinal cracks.

Apical Microleakage of Root-End Cavities Prepared by CO2 Laser

This in vitro study in extracted human teeth was designed to compare the degree of dye penetration of root-end cavities prepared by CO2 laser, ultrasonic retrotip, or rotary instrument. Eighty-two human anterior teeth were prepared and obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha and sealer. Root-end resection was performed at 90 degrees, 3 mm from apex. Root-end cavities were prepared by CO2 laser beam, ultrasonic retrotips, or bur and were filled with amalgam. The teeth were isolated and immersed in basic fuchsin at 36 degrees C for 48 hours. The roots were split longitudinally and examined by a stereomicroscope. Leakage was quantified by linear measurement of dye penetration with the aid of image-analyzing software. Apical leakage in the CO2 laser group was significantly less than in the ultrasonic retrotip and bur groups. The difference between the ultrasonic and bur groups was insignificant. Based on the results of this in vitro study, application of CO2 laser for root-end cavity preparation appears to decrease the apical leakage.

Evaluation of different methods for the root-end cavity preparation

OBJECTIVE

The dentinal walls of root-end cavities were examined for the presence of cracks and debris in correlation with the area of the root surfaces that remained after the resection.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred extracted single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated, mounted in acrylic resin blocks, and the apical 2 mm of the root-apex was resected. According to the resected root surface area the teeth were divided into 2 groups having large (>2 mm(2)) or small (<2 mm(2)) surface area. For retrograde cavity preparation 4 devices were used: slow-speed handpiece, diamond coated stainless steel ultrasonic tip, smooth stainless steel ultrasonic tips, and sonic diamond-coated tips. Teeth were examined under a videomicroscope for the presence of fractures, dentin chips, and gutta-percha remnants on cavity walls. Preparation time was also recorded.

RESULTS

Preparation with smooth stainless steel ultrasonic tips produced few intradentin cracks. Dentin debris was more frequently seen in rotary preparations whereas gutta-percha remnants were seen mainly at ultrasonically prepared teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonic and ultrasonic devices produced cleaner, well-centered, and more conservative root-end cavities than the rotary instrumentation. Cracks do not correlate directly with the surface area of the root-end surfaces but rather with the type of retrotip used to prepare the root-end cavity.

Marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) compared with amalgam as a root-end filling material: a low-vacuum (LV) versus high-vacuum (HV) SEM study

AIM

To compare the marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or amalgam root-end fillings in extracted teeth under low-vacuum (LV) versus high-vacuum (HV) scanning electron microscope (SEM) viewing conditions.

METHODOLOGY

Root-end fillings were placed in 20 extracted single-rooted maxillary teeth. Ten root ends were filled with MTA and the other 10 root ends were filled with amalgam. Two 1 mm thick transverse sections of each root-end filling were cut 0.50 mm (top) and 1.50 mm (bottom) from the apex. Gap size was recorded at eight fixed points along the dentine-filling material interface on each section when uncoated wet (LV wet (LVW)) and dry under LV (0.3 Torr) in a JEOL JSM-5800 SEM and backscatter emission (LV dry uncoated (LVDU)). The sections were then air-dried, gold-coated and gap size was recorded once again at the fixed points under HV (10(-6) Torr; HV dry coated (HVDC)). Specimen cracking, and the size and extent of the crack were noted.

RESULTS

Gap sizes at fixed points were smallest under LVW and largest under HVDC SEM conditions. Gaps were smallest in MTA root-end fillings. A General Linear Models Analysis, with gap size as the dependent variable, showed significant effects for extent of crack in dentine, material and viewing condition (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that MTA produced a superior marginal adaptation to amalgam, and that LVW conditions showed the lowest gap size. Gap size was influenced by the method of SEM viewing. If only HV SEM viewing conditions are used for MTA and amalgam root-end fillings, a correction factor of 3.5 and 2.2, respectively, may be used to enable relative comparisons of gap size to LVW conditions.

Evaluation of root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips

AIM

To evaluate and compare the efficiency of root-end preparations using ultrasonic retrotips coated with diamond and zirconium nitride.

METHODOLOGY

Eighty-five extracted single-rooted teeth were root filled, and then resected 3 mm from their apices. Root-end cavities were prepared with KiS (zirconium nitride-coated retrotip), CT-5 (stainless steel tip) or diamond-coated (DC) ultrasonic retrotips, and 10 teeth served as controls. Thirty teeth were used for evaluation of the time required to prepare the root-end cavity, the number of microcracks produced on the resected surface and the number of dentinal tubule openings on the root-canal wall using scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. A further 55 teeth were used for evaluation of dye penetration following filling of the root-end cavities with Super EBA. The degree of dye penetration in millimetres was measured under the microscope after 7 days of immersion in India ink. Statistical analyses were performed using the one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's F-test as the post hoc test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the number of microcracks and dentinal tubule openings present in the root apices prepared by the three retrotips. The time required for root-end cavity preparation using the DC retrotip was significantly less than that using the other groups (P<0.01). Positive controls showed dye penetration throughout the length of the root-end cavity, and negative controls showed no dye penetration. There was no significant difference between the three experimental groups in dye penetration.

CONCLUSIONS

In this laboratory study, the time required to prepare root-end cavities using KiS retrotips was the same as that using CT-5 retrotips, and longer than that using DC retrotips. There was no significant difference in the number of microcracks or dye penetration between the three kinds of retrotips.

Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks: a comparative study of visual magnification

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of visual enhancements as aids in identifying artificially created dentinal cracks in resected root ends. Fifty human maxillary central incisors were decoronated, and the root canals were instrumented to ISO size 50 at the working length. The apical 3 mm of the roots were resected, and cracks were artificially created in the apical dentin with an average load of 5.6 kg using a cylindrical wedge in a miniature drill press. A video microscope at x65 magnification was used to observe the cracks as they developed. Four independent examiners evaluated the root specimens using unaided/corrected vision (group 1), loupes at x3.3 magnification (group 2), a surgical operating microscope at x10 magnification (group 3), and the Orascope at x35 magnification (group 4). The examiners' proficiency at correctly identifying root ends with and without cracks was evaluated. The data were compared to the predetermined standard (27 cracked, 23 not cracked) with a one-tailed Fisher's exact test (alpha = 0.05). Statistically, the Orascope (p = 0.02) was significantly superior, whereas using unaided/corrected vision (p = 0.99), loupes (p = 0.88), or the microscope (p = 0.14) was not significantly better than guessing. The accuracy of correct identification for unaided/ corrected vision, loupes, the microscope, and the Orascope was 39%, 45%, 53%, and 58%, respectively. A two-way analysis of variance of the accuracy of crack identification showed a significant difference among the four visualization techniques (p = 0.0007) and also among the four evaluators (p = 0.006).

Investigation of the marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials in root-end cavities prepared with ultrasonic tips

AIM

To compare the surface topography of root apices following ultrasonic root-end preparation, and again after root-end fillings submitted to three different finishing techniques.

METHODOLOGY

Eighty-one root-end cavities prepared ultrasonically in human canines, were divided at random into three test groups of 27 each. The cavities were filled with Super-EBA, IRM, or ProRoot-MTA and finished by ball burnishing. Eighteen roots from each group received a final finish with either a 30-fluted tungsten carbide finishing bur, or a Zekrya carbide 28 mm bur after storage in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. The root-end surface topographies were reproduced by means of polyvinylsiloxane impressions and epoxy resin replicas. Scanning electron micrography (SEM) images of each replica were taken prior to and after root-end filling. An image analysis system was used to compare the alteration of the marginal chipping areas and to calculate the gaps located in the dentine/root-end filling interface.

RESULTS

When a bur was used to finish the set materials, a significant (P < 0.05) area of marginal chipping was eliminated. The finishing technique did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect the incidence of gaps in groups root-end filled with MTA or IRM. Super-EBA and IRM retrofillings finished with a ball burnisher or a Zekrya bur displayed a significantly (P < 0.05) larger calculated gap area than roots filled with MTA.

CONCLUSION

Under this in vitro study, the marginal adaptation of MTA was good with or without finishing procedures. Applying a finishing bur over the condensed and set IRM and Super-EBA created better marginal adaptation.

Effect of sonic and ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation on the integrity of root apices of freshly extracted human teeth: scanning electron microscopy analysis

Sonic and ultrasonic root-end preparation devices permit the preparation of conservative and straight cavities. However, microfractures and marginal chipping can occur due to the vibratory action of such instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of retrograde preparations by using sonic and ultrasonic tips on the integrity of root-end surfaces. Eighty, human anterior teeth were grouped according to size and treated as follows: treatment 1: root-end resection (RR) and root-end cavity preparation (RP) with KIS ultrasonic retrotip; treatment 2: RR and RP with Satelec S12/90 (no diamond coating) ultrasonic retrotip; treatment 3: RR and RP with a diamond-coated retrotip attached to a sonic device (Sonics); treatment 4: RR and RP with Satelec S12/90D (diamond coated) ultrasonic retrotip. The root-end surface topographies were assayed by means of polyvinylsiloxane impressions and epoxy resin replicas. SEM pictures of each sample were taken before and after preparation, and the images were evaluated by using an image processing and analysis system. The parameters evaluated were shape quality, presence of cracks, and marginal chipping. The results showed no statistically significant differences among anatomic groups, treatments, or tooth sizes (p > 0.05). Because treatment 3 removed more dental structure than the others did, its use on small teeth is inadvisable.

Root-end fracture during retropreparation: a comparison between zirconium nitride-coated and stainless steel microsurgical ultrasonic instruments

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a stainless steel (CT-5) and zirconium nitride coated (KiS) microsurgical ultrasonic instrument with regard to possible root-end fracture production during retropreparation. Forty extracted human central incisors were prepared in a crown-down fashion. Canals were obturated with gutta-percha by lateral condensation. Root-ends were resected. Teeth were placed in methylene blue for 48 h and evaluated by three independent evaluators under microscope. Teeth with existing fractures were eliminated from the study. The remaining teeth were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A was prepared with the CT-5 tip and Group B with the KiS tip. Preparation time was recorded for all roots. The teeth were again immersed in methylene blue for 48 h and reevaluated. No root-end fractures were produced by either the KiS or CT-5 microsurgical ultrasonic instruments.

Occlusal loading of EBA and MTA root-end fillings in a computer-controlled masticator: a scanning electron microscopic study

AIM

The aim of this investigation was to assess the marginal adaptation of Super-EBA (EBA) and Pro Root MTA (MTA) root-end fillings and the occurrence of microcracks in resected root-ends of extracted teeth before and after occlusal loading for a five-year equivalent period in a computer-controlled masticator.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty-four molar teeth were root-filled using lateral condensation and their root-ends resected. Root-end cavities were prepared and either EBA or MTA root-end fillings were placed. All surgical procedures were completed in vitro under an operating microscope. Replicas taken of the root-end fillings and resected root-ends were examined using an SEM before and after they were subjected to in vitro chewing cycles in a computer-controlled chewing simulator for the equivalent of 5 years. Marginal adaptation and integrity of the two root-end filling materials were evaluated and the presence of microcracks recorded.

RESULTS

Before loading, a continuous margin was observed with 99.4 +/- 2.4% of EBA and 99.2 +/- 1.6% of MTA root-end fillings. After loading, the percentage of continuous margin decreased to 93.1 +/- 6.6% and 98.9 +/- 3.2% for EBA and MTA, respectively. After occlusal loading, 39.5% of the EBA root-end fillings were overfilled, whilst 52.6% of the MTA root-end fillings were underfilled. In total, 12.5% of the resected root-end surfaces showed microcracking before loading and 25% after occlusal loading.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EBA and MTA displayed excellent marginal adaptation before masticatory loading. After loading, the amount of continuous margin for both root-end filling materials decreased slightly but was still high.

An in vitro study comparing root-end cavities prepared by diamond-coated and stainless steel ultrasonic retrotips

AIM

This study compared the appearance of root-end cavity preparations and the time required to prepare them using prototype ultrasonic diamond-coated (DC) and stainless-steel (SS) retrotips.

METHODOLOGY

In 12 maxillary and 12 mandibular molar teeth 48 root-end cavities were prepared ultrasonically in the palatal, mesio-buccal, distal and mesial root-ends using DC and SS retrotips, alternately. Replicas of the resected root tips and the root-end cavities were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM), recording (i) incidence and extent of dentine cracks (ii) minimum remaining thickness of the dentine walls and (iii) surface quality of the resected root-ends. The time taken to complete the preparation was also recorded. Means of these parameters were compared for both types of retrotips using nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

No resected root-ends had cracks before preparation. However, after preparation one root-end cavity shaped by an SS retrotip had a microcrack visible at 23x magnification. Four and seven other root-ends had crazed surfaces in the DC and SS groups, respectively (P > 0.05). Remaining minimum dentine thickness was 0.56 +/- 0.28 mm and 0.71 +/- 0.24 for the DC and SS groups, respectively, and this difference was significant (P < 0.05). A root-end cavity in one specimen in the DC group was perforated. Preparation times ranged from 25 s to 361 s and were significantly lower for DC tips (P < 0.01) than the SS tips. The time required to prepare root-end cavities also differed between roots; root-end preparation in mandibular molars was more time consuming.

CONCLUSIONS

A better quality surface was produced by the prototype diamond-coated retrotips, in less time than the SS retrotips, which in turn caused fewer cracks than previously reported. DC retrotips removed more dentine than SS retrotips and should therefore be used with care to avoid overpreparation or perforation.

Quality of root-end preparations using ultrasonic and rotary instrumentation in cadavers

Prior investigations have demonstrated dentinal cracking and chipping during ultrasonic preparation of the root-end. This study compared the frequency of cracking and chipping in two groups, cadaver and extracted teeth, using an indirect resin technique. Preparations were performed using either a 33 1/2 inverted cone bur in a high-speed handpiece, or with ultrasonics using a CT-2 tip at either high or low intensity. After replication of the root-end in epoxy resin, all teeth were evaluated for cracking and chipping under scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analysis using a general contingency table or ANOVA with Scheffé post-hoc analysis (p = 0.05) revealed no significant difference between all groups in terms of root-end cracking. In extracted teeth (n = 15), rotary instrumentation produced less chipping than either ultrasonic technique. Varying the intensity was not significant. There was no significant difference between any instrumentation group in cadaver teeth (n = 10) related to the amount of chipping.

Ultrasonic root-end preparation with smooth and diamond-coated tips

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of smooth and diamond-coated ultrasonic retrotips on the external and internal surfaces of root-end preparations with the aid of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Forty-four mesial roots of human mandibular molars were selected. The canals were cleaned, shaped and obturated using gutta-percha and sealer. The apical portions were resected at a 45 degrees-angle bevel exposing both mesial canals and the isthmus area. The roots were then divided into two groups according to the type of root-end preparation: Group A--performed with smooth retrotips (S) and Group B--performed with diamond-coated retrotips (DC). The specimens were coded and prepared for SEM evaluation. Observations of the external surface preparation showed that the S and DC retrotips produced very well-centered cavities involving both canals and isthmus area with minimal deviations and no perforative defects. When the internal surface of the root-end preparations was evaluated, it was evident that the use of S retrotips resulted in clean canal walls with little superficial debris and smear layer. Internal canal surfaces done with DC retrotips were irregular showing patent grooves, in contrast with the more uniform, regular and smoother surfaces when S retrotips were employed.

Evaluation of diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments for root-end preparation

Ultrasonic instrumentation has been associated with cracking of the dentin in the area of the root-end preparation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate root-end preparations for cracking and to describe cavosurface morphology after the use of diamond-coated instruments. Forty teeth were inspected for intradentin cracks, incomplete canal cracks, and complete canal cracks before and after preparation with a stainless steel CT-5 ultrasonic instrument and again after root-end preparation with an S12D/90 degrees diamond-coated instrument. Six teeth had polyvinylsiloxane impressions taken of the root ends after preparation with the CT-5 and again after preparation with the diamond-coated instrument. Replicas were made, split, sputter-coated, and inspected using the scanning electron microscope. This study indicates that use of the diamond-coated instrument for root-end preparation does not result in significant root-end cracking and that it can remove cracks created by a prior instrument's use. The use of the diamond-coated instrument resulted in a heavily abraded, debris-covered cavosurface that may affect the apical seal.

Root deformation during root-end preparation

Ultrasonic root-end preparation techniques have recently been introduced and revolutionized the field of endodontic surgery. However, several reports claimed that there was an increasing incidence of crack formation after ultrasonic root-end preparation. As yet, little work has focused on the root deformation during root-end preparation. Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to measure the amount of root deformation during root-end preparation with the use of microhandpiece and ultrasonic systems by using strain gauge methods, and simultaneously to detect any cracks with the aid of the stereomicroscope, stain, and an image processing system. The results demonstrated the ultrasonic instrumentation produced significantly greater strain on average than that generated with the microhandpiece system. From the viewpoint of fracture, any technique that could diminish the strain on the root would decrease the likelihood of fracture; however, no crack was observed on any resected surface of roots in this study.

A scanning electron microscopic study of in vivo ultrasonic root-end preparations

The purpose of this in vivo study was to evaluate root-ends for cracks after root resection and again after ultrasonic root-end preparation in patients undergoing endodontic surgery. Endodontic surgery was performed on 25 roots from 20 patients. In vivo vinyl polysiloxane impressions were made after root resection and again after ultrasonic root-end preparations. Epoxy resin casts were made from the impressions and scanning electron micrographic examination of the root-end replicas was performed. There was no evidence of cracks after root resection. One incomplete canal crack was evident after ultrasonic root-end preparation.

Root-end cavity preparation after apicoectomy using a new type of sonic and diamond-surfaced retrotip: a 1-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the outcome of periradicular surgery using a new set of retrotips for root-end cavity preparation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients who had 50 consecutively treated teeth with periradicular pathology were enrolled in this prospective study. After apicoectomy, root-end cavity preparation was performed, using diamond-surfaced retrotips driven by a sonic handpiece; EBA-cement was used as the root-end filling material. Healing assessment was based on clinical and radiographic criteria.

RESULTS

At the 1-year follow-up, 82% of the reexamined surgical cases presented with successful healing. Fourteen percent of the treated teeth were deemed as improved (partial healing), and 4% were classified as failures.

CONCLUSION

The new retrotips were found to be ideal for root-end cavity preparation. They simplify the surgical approach to root ends where the working space is limited by restricted access. Root-ends prepared with this new sonoabrasive technique yielded excellent results at the 1-year follow-up examination.

Ultrasonic root-end preparation: influence of cutting angle on the apical seal

Apical resection is fundamental in obtaining a correct apical seal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the apical root resection angle and the cavity made by ultrasonic retrotips may influence the apical seal. A total of 48 extracted teeth were endodontically treated and sealed by guttapercha vertical compaction: 24 were resected with a 45 degrees angle and 24 with a 90 degrees one. An ultrasound source (P.M. 400 EMS) and a CT5 Scaler were used to make the retrograde cavity that was filled afterwards with EBA-zinc oxide-eugenol alumina-added cement. Apical leakage was determined using fuchsin and assessed after the roots were sectioned longitudinally. Linear dye penetration in dentin and at the interface between dentin and cement was measured with a stereomicroscope (x 12 magnification), and the results were statistically analyzed. Results showed that there was less infiltration both in dentin and in the space between the filling and the dentinal wall in the group with the 90 degrees angle, but this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) only for the dentin. None of the samples showed leakage greater than the depth of the preparation. An apical cavity of 3 mm or more along the vertical axis can produce a safe and effective seal.

Ultrasonic root end cavity preparation assessed by an in situ impression technique

PROBLEM

In vitro studies have demonstrated microfractures in resected roots after root end cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips. Such microfractures are of concern; however, they may be artifacts.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of microfractures after ultrasonic root end cavity preparation in situ.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-two roots in two cadavers were endodontically treated, the soft tissues excised, and the root ends exposed and resected. The resected root surfaces were replicated with polyvinylsiloxane impressions. Root end cavities were prepared with ultrasonic tips, then impressed a second time. The roots were retrieved; 25 were processed for direct SEM examination as were both the impressions of each root. The specimens were examined by stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

In the impressions, the resected and prepared surfaces appeared irregular, but none demonstrated microfractures. In contrast, 15 retrieved roots showed microfractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonic root end cavity preparation in situ did not cause root microfractures, and the impression technique could be clinically usable with minor modifications.

Comparison of dentinal crack incidence and of post removal time resulting from post removal by ultrasonic or mechanical force

The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of canal and intradentin cracks after intraradicular post removal using ultrasonic instrumentation or the Gonan post removal system. Sixty cadaver teeth were divided into 4 groups of 15 teeth each: group 1, ultrasonic removal; group 2, Gonan post removal system; group 3, cemented posts not removed; and group 4, no posts. Groups 1 and 2 were contralateral matched pairs. Para Posts were placed in groups 1, 2, and 3 to 7 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction and luted with ZnPO4 cement. The time required for post removal in groups 1 and 2 was recorded. The teeth were extracted, sectioned, and examined. Canal and intradentin cracks were mapped, and their frequency was recorded at each level. There were statistically more cracks present in the ultrasonic group than the no post group. There were no other differences that reached statistical significance. It took significantly longer for post removal using the ultrasonic tip versus the Gonan system.

Evaluation for cracks associated with ultrasonic root-end preparation of gutta-percha filled canals

Many clinicians use ultrasonics for root-end preparations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate resected root-end surfaces of bilaterally matched human teeth for cracks before and after ultrasonic root-end preparation. Twenty matched pairs of extracted single rooted teeth were divided into two experimental groups. In group 1, root-end resection was performed on uninstrumented teeth. In group 2, root-end resection was performed after the canals were instrumented and filled with gutta-percha. All teeth in both groups received root-end preparations using ultrasonic instrumentation at low power. Two examiners evaluated the root-ends after root-end resection and again after root-end preparation using zoom magnification of 20x to 63x. The number, types, and location of cracks were mapped. There were no significant differences when gutta-percha filled roots were compared to uninstrumented roots with regard to the number or type of cracks after root-end resection or root-end preparation. In addition, there were no significant differences in the number or type of cracks following root resection and ultrasonic root-end preparation when compared to teeth with root resection alone.

Incidence of root face alteration after ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation

PROBLEM

Ultrasonic root end preparation is now a recognized clinical procedure. Advantages claimed include improved access to the surgical site (because of reduced root end bevel), and faster more conservative preparation of the root end cavity. However, cracking of the root face has been reported after preparation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of root end cracking at varying ultrasonic power levels with a replica technique and scanning electron microscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

The root canals of 55 single-rooted teeth were prepared to size 40 apically and obturated with laterally condensed gutta perch and sealer. Root ends were resected at 90 degrees 3 mm from the apex. Class 1 cavities (n = 5) were prepared with retro tips in a Neosonic handpiece with different power settings. Time of preparation and load applied were constant. Another experimental group (n = 5) was prepared with a no. 1 rotary bur. A replica technique with addition-cured silicone impression material and epoxy resin was used to prevent drying artefacts. Specimens were viewed under scanning electron microscope for alterations of the root face.

RESULTS

Results showed no root face cracking across the full range of instrument power settings, although chipping of the retrograde cavity margins was observed. No cracking was noted in bur-prepared teeth.

Root-end cavity preparation using the MicroMega Sonic Retro-prep Tip. SEM analysis

The objective of this laboratory study was to compare root-end cavities prepared with sonic Retro-prep tips in a MM1500 Sonic Air handpiece with those created by burs in a conventional handpiece. A total of 80 single-rooted extracted human teeth with mature apices and straight canals were included in the study. Four groups of 20 extracted teeth were prepared as follows: I, a 3-4 mm root-end resection perpendicular to the long axis of the root, with a size 40 sonic Retro-prep tip creating an apical cavity 3 mm into root canal system; II, a 45 degrees bevel of the root-face removing a 3-4 mm root segment and root-end preparation as per group I; III, root-end resection as per group I, with an apical cavity prepared using a size 010 inverted cone bur 3 mm down the long axis of the root; IV, resection as per group II, followed by an apical cavity preparation with a size 010 inverted cone bur 3 mm into the root canal system. The apical root portion and root-end cavities were replicated and prepared for SEM analysis at x 20 and x 80 magnification. The degree of chipping associated with the margin of the root-end cavities, as evaluated with a standard grading system, and the incidence of root-face cracks were noted. Marginal chipping of root-end cavities prepared using sonic instrumentation was significantly worse than that produced by burs (P < 0.001). Perpendicular root-end resections showed significantly better scores than bevelled root-end resections (P < 0.005). The incidence of root-face cracking was low with no significant difference between the experimental groups.

Evaluation of cracks associated with ultrasonic root-end preparation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the integrity of resected root-end surfaces of extracted human teeth after using ultrasonic tips at low or high frequencies for root-end preparation. Thirty bilaterally matched pairs of single-rooted human teeth had root-end resections using a low-speed diamond saw and were examined for root-end cracks. The matched pairs of teeth were then divided into two experimental groups, with one member of each pair being placed in each group. In group 1, root-end preparations were made with an ultrasonic tip on the lowest frequency setting. The preparations in group 2 were done on the highest power setting. Two investigators again examined the resected root-ends using a stereomicroscope at x20 to x63 and recorded the numbers, types, and location of the cracks. Three types of cracks were observed: canal cracks, intradentin cracks, and cemental cracks. There were significantly more root-ends with cracks after ultrasonic root-end preparation than after root-end resection only. In root-ends that had any cracks, significantly more canal cracks per root occurred when the ultrasonic tip was used on the high-frequency setting for root-end preparation than when the ultrasonic tip was used on the low power setting.