1
|
Stancheva R, Cantonati M, Manoylov K, Furey PC, Cahoon AB, Jones RC, Gillevet P, Amsler CD, Wehr JD, Salerno JL, Krueger-Hadfield SA. The importance of integrating phycological research, teaching, outreach, and engagement in a changing world. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY 2024. [PMID: 39364681 DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
The ecological, evolutionary, economic, and cultural importance of algae necessitates a continued integration of phycological research, education, outreach, and engagement. Here, we comment on several topics discussed during a networking workshop-Algae and the Environment-that brought together phycological researchers from a variety of institutions and career stages. We share some of our perspectives on the state of phycology by examining gaps in teaching and research. We identify action areas where we urge the phycological community to prepare itself to embrace the rapidly changing world. We emphasize the need for more trained taxonomists as well as integration with molecular techniques, which may be expensive and complicated but are important. An essential benefit of these integrative studies is the creation of high-quality algal reference barcoding libraries augmented with morphological, physiological, and ecological data that are important for studies of systematics and crucial for the accuracy of the metabarcoding bioassessment. We highlight different teaching approaches for engaging undergraduate students in algal studies and the importance of algal field courses, forays, and professional phycological societies in supporting the algal training of students, professionals, and citizen scientists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalina Stancheva
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
- Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center, Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
| | - Marco Cantonati
- BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, BiGeA, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Kalina Manoylov
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, Georgia, USA
| | - Paula C Furey
- Department of Biology, St. Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - A Bruce Cahoon
- Department of Natural Sciences, The University of Virginia's College at Wise, Wise, Virginia, USA
| | - R Christian Jones
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
- Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center, Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
| | - Pat Gillevet
- Department of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Charles D Amsler
- Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - John D Wehr
- Louis Calder Center - Biological Field Station and Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, Armonk, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer L Salerno
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
- Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center, Woodbridge, Virginia, USA
| | - Stacy A Krueger-Hadfield
- Virginia Institute of Marine Science Eastern Shore Laboratory, Wachapreague, Virginia, USA
- William & Mary's Batten School of Coastal and Marine Science at VIMS, Gloucester Point, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holt G, Macqueen A, Lester RE. A flexible consistent framework for modelling multiple interacting environmental responses to management in space and time. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 367:122054. [PMID: 39106797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
Management of resources is often a large-scale task addressed using many small-scale interventions. The range of scales at which organisms respond to those interventions, along with the many outcomes which management aims to achieve can make determining the success of management complex. Environmental flow is an example of management where there is a recognized need for managers to demonstrate the impact of their actions by integrating different types of environmental responses. Here, we aim to support decision making in environmental management via the development of a new modelling framework (eFlowEval). It has the capacity to capture best-available knowledge, to scale it in space and time, explore interactions among species, compare scenarios, and account for uncertainty. Thus, it provides a basis for including multiple target groups in a common system. The framework is readily updatable as new information becomes available and can identify where data are insufficient to be scientifically robust. We demonstrate the eFlowEval framework using three very different environmental responses: 1) metabolism, which is a measure of the energy produced and then used in an ecosystem, 2) favorability for a bird species of interest (royal spoonbill Platalea regia), and 3) competing wetland plants (Centipeda cunninghamii and lippia Phyla canescens). These demonstrations illustrate the capability of the eFlowEval framework but the specific outputs shown here should not be used to assess environmental responses to management. Using these demonstrations, we illustrate the capacity of the eFlowEval framework to provide assessments across a range of scales (local to landscape) and from short time frames (weeks to months) to multi-year assessments. Further, we illustrate the ability to: i) scale responses from local to basin scales, ii) vary driver-response model types, iii) represent uncertainty, iv) compare scenarios, v) accommodate variable parameter values at different locations, and vi) incorporate spatial and temporal dependencies and dependencies among species. We also illustrate the framework's ability to capture inter- and intraspecific interactions and their impact in space and time. The eFlowEval framework extends the capacity of the component response models to provide novel modeling capabilities for management at scale. It allows for interactions among species or processes to be incorporated, as well as in space and time. A large degree of flexibility is offered by the framework, in terms of driver-response model types, input data, and aggregation methods. Thus, the eFlowEval framework provides a mechanism to enhance the transparency of environmental watering decision making, capture institutional knowledge, enhance adaptive management and undertake evaluation of the impact of environmental watering at a range of spatial and temporal scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen Holt
- Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
| | - Ashley Macqueen
- Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
| | - Rebecca E Lester
- Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kotamäki N, Arhonditsis G, Hjerppe T, Hyytiäinen K, Malve O, Ovaskainen O, Paloniitty T, Similä J, Soininen N, Weigel B, Heiskanen AS. Strategies for integrating scientific evidence in water policy and law in the face of uncertainty. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 931:172855. [PMID: 38692324 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Understanding how human actions and environmental change affect water resources is crucial for addressing complex water management issues. The scientific tools that can produce the necessary information are ecological indicators, referring to measurable properties of the ecosystem state; environmental monitoring, the data collection process that is required to evaluate the progress towards reaching water management goals; mathematical models, linking human disturbances with the ecosystem state to predict environmental impacts; and scenarios, assisting in long-term management and policy implementation. Paradoxically, despite the rapid generation of data, evolving scientific understanding, and recent advancements in systems modeling, there is a striking imbalance between knowledge production and knowledge utilization in decision-making. In this paper, we examine the role and potential capacity of scientific tools in guiding governmental decision-making processes and identify the most critical disparities between water management, policy, law, and science. We demonstrate how the complex, uncertain, and gradually evolving nature of scientific knowledge might not always fit aptly to the legislative and policy processes and structures. We contend that the solution towards increased understanding of socio-ecological systems and reduced uncertainty lies in strengthening the connections between water management theory and practice, among the scientific tools themselves, among different stakeholders, and among the social, economic, and ecological facets of water quality management, law, and policy. We conclude by tying in three knowledge-exchange strategies, namely - adaptive management, Driver-Pressure-Status-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, and participatory modeling - that offer complementary perspectives to bridge the gap between science and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niina Kotamäki
- Finnish Environment Institute, Survontie 9A, FI-40500 Jyväskylä, Finland.
| | - George Arhonditsis
- Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada
| | - Turo Hjerppe
- Ministry of the Environment, P.O. Box 35, 00023 Government, Finland
| | - Kari Hyytiäinen
- Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olli Malve
- Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Otso Ovaskainen
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland; Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Helsinki 00014, Finland; Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tiina Paloniitty
- University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law, P.O. Box 4, FI-00014, Finland
| | - Jukka Similä
- University of Lapland, Faculty of Law, Yliopistonkatu 8, FI-96300 Rovaniemi, Finland
| | - Niko Soininen
- Law School, Center for Climate Change, Energy, and Environmental Law, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Larned ST, Snelder TH. Meeting the Growing Need for Land-Water System Modelling to Assess Land Management Actions. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 73:1-18. [PMID: 37845574 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-023-01894-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Elevated contaminant levels and hydrological alterations resulting from land use are degrading aquatic ecosystems on a global scale. A range of land management actions may be used to reduce or prevent this degradation. To select among alternative management actions, decision makers require predictions of their effectiveness, their economic impacts, estimated uncertainty in the predictions, and estimated time lags between management actions and environmental responses. There are multiple methods for generating these predictions, but the most rigorous and transparent methods involve quantitative modelling. The challenge for modellers is two-fold. First, they must employ models that represent complex land-water systems, including the causal chains linking land use to contaminant loss and water use, catchment processes that alter contaminant loads and flow regimes, and ecological responses in aquatic environments. Second, they must ensure that these models meet the needs of endusers in terms of reliability, usefulness, feasibility and transparency. Integrated modelling using coupled models to represent the land-water system can meet both challenges and has advantages over alternative approaches. The need for integrated land-water system modelling is growing as the extent and intensity of human land use increases, and regulatory agencies seek more effective land management actions to counter the adverse effects. Here we present recommendations for modelling teams, to help them improve current practices and meet the growing need for land-water system models. The recommendations address several aspects of integrated modelling: (1) assembling modelling teams; (2) problem framing and conceptual modelling; (3) developing spatial frameworks; (4) integrating economic and biophysical models; (5) selecting and coupling models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott T Larned
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Williams BK, Brown ED. Four conservation challenges and a synthesis. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10052. [PMID: 37153016 PMCID: PMC10154884 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Conservation and management of biological systems involves decision-making over time, with a generic goal of sustaining systems and their capacity to function in the future. We address four persistent and difficult conservation challenges: (1) prediction of future consequences of management, (2) uncertainty about the system's structure, (3) inability to observe ecological systems fully, and (4) nonstationary system dynamics. We describe these challenges in terms of dynamic systems subject to different sources of uncertainty, and we present a basic Markovian framework that can encompass approaches to all four challenges. Finding optimal conservation strategies for each challenge requires issue-specific structural features, including adaptations of state transition models, uncertainty metrics, valuation of accumulated returns, and solution methods. Strategy valuation exhibits not only some remarkable similarities among approaches but also some important operational differences. Technical linkages among the models highlight synergies in solution approaches, as well as possibilities for combining them in particular conservation problems. As methodology and computing software advance, such an integrated conservation framework offers the potential to improve conservation outcomes with strategies to allocate management resources efficiently and avoid negative consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eleanor D. Brown
- Science and Decisions CenterU.S. Geological SurveyRestonVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Issa R, Sarsour A, Cullip T, Toma S, Ruyssen I, Scheerens C. Gaps and opportunities in the climate change, migration and health nexus: insights from a questionnaire based study of practitioners and researchers. J Migr Health 2023; 7:100171. [PMID: 37034242 PMCID: PMC10074186 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background : While climate change and migration are separately recognised as public health challenges, the combination of the two - climate change-induced migration which is predicted to increase through this century - requires further research to ensure population health needs are met. As such, this paper aims to identify initial gaps and opportunities in the nexus of climate change, migration and health research. Methods : We conducted a questionnaire based study of academics and practitioners working in the fields of climate change, migration and health. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed. Results : Responses from 72 practitioners collected in October 2021 were categorised into a thematic framework encompassing i) gaps and opportunities: across health care and outcomes, impact pathways between climate change and migration, most at risk groups (specific actors) and regions, and longitudinal perspectives on migrant journeys; alongside ii) methodological challenges; iii) ethical challenges, and iv) advancing research with better funding and collaboration. Broadly, findings suggested that research must clarify the interlinkages and drivers between climate change, migration, health (systems), and intersecting factors including the broader determinants of health. Study of the dynamics of migration needs to extend beyond the current focus of rural-urban migration and international migration into high income countries, to include internal displacement and immobile/ trapped populations. Research could better include considerations of vulnerable groups currently underrepresented, people with specific health needs, and focus more on most at-risk regions. Research methodology could be strengthened through better data and definitions, clear ethical guidelines, and increased funding and collaboration. Conclusion : This study describes gaps, challenges and needs within research on the nexus of climate change, migration and health, in acknowledgement of the complexity of studying across multiple intersecting factors. Working with complexity can be supported by using the framework and findings to support researchers grappling with these intersecting themes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Issa
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- Corresponding author.
| | - Amal Sarsour
- The United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), Bruges, Belgium
| | - Teresa Cullip
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sorana Toma
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ilse Ruyssen
- The United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), Bruges, Belgium
- Department of Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Scheerens
- The United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), Bruges, Belgium
- Department of Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
López-González LA, Cruz-Motta JJ, Rosario A, Hanke M, Appeldoorn R. Comparison of Underwater Visual Census (UVC), Underwater Remote Video (RUV), and Handline Used by Fisheries-Independent Programs to Assess Reef Fish. CARIBB J SCI 2022. [DOI: 10.18475/cjos.v52i2.a13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leysa A. López-González
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
| | - Juan J. Cruz-Motta
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
| | - Aida Rosario
- Division of Management and Investigation of Commercial Fisheries, Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Marcos Hanke
- Caribbean Fishery Management Council, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Richard Appeldoorn
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The replicability crisis in science and protected area research: Poor practices and potential solutions. J Nat Conserv 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
McElderry RM, Gaoue OG. Pitfalls to avoid in nonlinear perturbation analysis of structured population models. POPUL ECOL 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/1438-390x.12132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M. McElderry
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland
| | - Orou G. Gaoue
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA
- Faculty of Agronomy University of Parakou Parakou Benin
- Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
MacLeod CJ, Brandt AJ, Dicks LV. Facilitating the wise use of experts and evidence to inform local environmental decisions. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lynn V. Dicks
- University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paxton EH, Crampton LH, Vetter JP, Laut M, Berry L, Morey S. Minimizing extinction risk in the face of uncertainty: Developing conservation strategies for 2 rapidly declining forest bird species on Kaua‘i Island. WILDLIFE SOC B 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eben H. Paxton
- U.S. Geological Survey Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 USA
| | | | - John P. Vetter
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Island Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 USA
| | - Megan Laut
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Island Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 USA
| | - Lainie Berry
- Hawai‘i Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
| | - Steve Morey
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR 97232 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gibbons DW, Sandbrook C, Sutherland WJ, Akter R, Bradbury R, Broad S, Clements A, Crick HQP, Elliott J, Gyeltshen N, Heath M, Hughes J, Jenkins RKB, Jones AH, Lopez de la Lama R, Macfarlane NBW, Maunder M, Prasad R, Romero‐Muñoz A, Steiner N, Tremlett J, Trevelyan R, Vijaykumar S, Wedage I, Ockendon N. The relative importance of COVID-19 pandemic impacts on biodiversity conservation globally. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2022; 36:e13781. [PMID: 34057250 PMCID: PMC8239704 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on almost all aspects of human society and endeavor; the natural world and its conservation have not been spared. Through a process of expert consultation, we identified and categorized, into 19 themes and 70 subthemes, the ways in which biodiversity and its conservation have been or could be affected by the pandemic globally. Nearly 60% of the effects have been broadly negative. Subsequently, we created a compendium of all themes and subthemes, each with explanatory text, and in August 2020 a diverse group of experienced conservationists with expertise from across sectors and geographies assessed each subtheme for its likely impact on biodiversity conservation globally. The 9 subthemes ranked highest all have a negative impact. These were, in rank order, governments sidelining the environment during their economic recovery, reduced wildlife-based tourism income, increased habitat destruction, reduced government funding, increased plastic and other solid waste pollution, weakening of nature-friendly regulations and their enforcement, increased illegal harvest of wild animals, reduced philanthropy, and threats to survival of conservation organizations. In combination, these impacts present a worrying future of increased threats to biodiversity conservation but reduced capacity to counter them. The highest ranking positive impact, at 10, was the beneficial impact of wildlife-trade restrictions. More optimistically, among impacts ranked 11-20, 6 were positive and 4 were negative. We hope our assessment will draw attention to the impacts of the pandemic and, thus, improve the conservation community's ability to respond to such threats in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W. Gibbons
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceThe LodgeBedfordshireUK
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceThe David Attenborough BuildingCambridgeUK
| | | | - William J. Sutherland
- Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Biosecurity Research Initiative at St. Catherine's (BioRISC), St. Catherine's CollegeUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Richard Bradbury
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceThe LodgeBedfordshireUK
- Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jonathan Hughes
- UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring CentreCambridgeUK
| | | | | | - Rocio Lopez de la Lama
- Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | | | | | | - Alfredo Romero‐Muñoz
- Geography DepartmentHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Fundación CohabitarSucreBolivia
| | - Noa Steiner
- Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of KielKielGermany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Agu HU, Andrew C, Gore ML. Mapping Terra Incognita: An Expert Elicitation of Women's Roles in Wildlife Trafficking. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.683979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The gender dimensions of wildlife trafficking remain understudied even though the problem is of great socio-environmental significance. Data about the roles of women in wildlife trafficking offer critically needed indicators that can contribute to building evidence and setting targets for, and monitoring progress of, sustainable and equitable futures. We set three objectives for this research filling a major gap in conservation knowledge: (1) explore expert perceptions of primary roles that women may play in wildlife trafficking, (2) explore expert perceptions of secondary roles that women may play in wildlife trafficking, and (3) explore variability in roles for women in wildlife trafficking. We used an online survey to conduct expert elicitation in February 2020 to achieve objectives. Experts (N = 215) identified key assumptions associated with six primary and 32 secondary roles for women in wildlife trafficking. Results highlight the impacts of wildlife trafficking manifest in varied contexts across society, including persons harmed at local levels such as family members in general, widows and orphans. The perceived roles of women in the wildlife trafficking networks may be factored into transformative solutions to help combat wildlife trafficking and data from expert elicitation can inform future hypotheses and inferences on this topic of broad socio-environmental significance.
Collapse
|
14
|
De la Cruz A, Bastos R, Silva E, Cabral JA, Santos M. What to expect from alternative management strategies to conserve seabirds? Hints from a dynamic modelling framework applied to an endangered population. Anim Conserv 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. De la Cruz
- Marine Research University Institute (INMAR) Campus of International Excellence of the Sea (CEIMAR) University of Cádiz Cádiz Spain
| | - R. Bastos
- Laboratory of Applied Ecology CITAB – Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro‐Environment and Biological Services Institute for Innovation Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri‐food Production (Inov4Agro) University of Trás‐os‐Montes e Alto Douro Vila Real Portugal
| | - E. Silva
- Portuguese Society for the Study of Birds (SPEA) Lisboa Portugal
| | - J. A. Cabral
- Laboratory of Applied Ecology CITAB – Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro‐Environment and Biological Services Institute for Innovation Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri‐food Production (Inov4Agro) University of Trás‐os‐Montes e Alto Douro Vila Real Portugal
| | - M. Santos
- Laboratory of Applied Ecology CITAB – Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro‐Environment and Biological Services Institute for Innovation Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri‐food Production (Inov4Agro) University of Trás‐os‐Montes e Alto Douro Vila Real Portugal
- Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Maranhão, R. Dep. Gastão Vieira Buriticupu MA Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fitzgerald DB, Smith DR, Culver DC, Feller D, Fong DW, Hajenga J, Niemiller ML, Nolfi DC, Orndorff WD, Douglas B, Maloney KO, Young JA. Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision-making for data-deficient species. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2021; 35:1627-1638. [PMID: 33471375 PMCID: PMC8518685 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Many questions relevant to conservation decision-making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applications often employ a modified Delphi method, where experts provide judgments anonymously and mathematical aggregation techniques are used to combine judgments. The Sheffield elicitation framework (SHELF) differs in its behavioral approach to synthesizing individual judgments into a fully specified probability distribution for an unknown quantity. We used the SHELF protocol remotely to assess extinction risk of three subterranean aquatic species that are being considered for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. We provided experts an empirical threat assessment for each known locality over a video conference and recorded judgments on the probability of population persistence over four generations with online submission forms and R-shiny apps available through the SHELF package. Despite large uncertainty for all populations, there were key differences between species' risk of extirpation based on spatial variation in dominant threats, local land use and management practices, and species' microhabitat. The resulting probability distributions provided decision makers with a full picture of uncertainty that was consistent with the probabilistic nature of risk assessments. Discussion among experts during SHELF's behavioral aggregation stage clearly documented dominant threats (e.g., development, timber harvest, animal agriculture, and cave visitation) and their interactions with local cave geology and species' habitat. Our virtual implementation of the SHELF protocol demonstrated the flexibility of the approach for conservation applications operating on budgets and time lines that can limit in-person meetings of geographically dispersed experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B. Fitzgerald
- U.S. Geological SurveyLeetown Science Center11649 Leetown RoadKearneysvilleWV25430U.S.A.
| | - David R. Smith
- U.S. Geological SurveyLeetown Science Center11649 Leetown RoadKearneysvilleWV25430U.S.A.
| | - David C. Culver
- Department of Environmental ScienceAmerican University4400 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashingtonDC20016USA
| | - Daniel Feller
- Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesAppalachian Laboratory301 Braddock RdFrostburgMD21532USA
| | - Daniel W. Fong
- Department of BiologyAmerican University4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NWWashingtonDC20016USA
| | - Jeff Hajenga
- West Virginia Division of Natural ResourcesPO Box 67, Ward RdElkinsWV26241USA
| | - Matthew L. Niemiller
- Department of BiologyUniversity of Alabama HuntsvilleSST 369, 301 Sparkman DriveHuntsvilleAL35899USA
| | - Daniel C. Nolfi
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service4425 Burley Dr # AChubbuckID83202USA
| | - Wil D. Orndorff
- Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation600 E. Main St., 24th FloorRichmondVA23219USA
| | - Barbara Douglas
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service90 Vance DriveElkinsWV26241USA
| | - Kelly O. Maloney
- U.S. Geological SurveyLeetown Science Center11649 Leetown RoadKearneysvilleWV25430U.S.A.
| | - John A. Young
- U.S. Geological SurveyLeetown Science Center11649 Leetown RoadKearneysvilleWV25430U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thomas MJ, Pawar SK, Januchowski‐Hartley SR. A European eel (
Anguilla anguilla
) case study using structured elicitation to estimate instream infrastructure passability for freshwater fishes. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Merryn J. Thomas
- Department of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UK
- School of Psychology Cardiff University Cardiff UK
| | - Sayali K. Pawar
- Department of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UK
- Department of Geography and Environmental Science Dundee University Nethergate Dundee UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
McElderry RM, Paxton EH, Nguyen AV, Siers SR. Distilling Professional Opinion to Gauge Vulnerability of Guam Avifauna to Brown Treesnake Predation. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.683964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The avifauna of Guam was devastated by the introduction of the Brown Treesnake, and the restoration of native birds would need to address the problem with eradication or suppression of BTS. With eradication of the snake unlikely in the near term, and suppression capabilities limited to specific finite areas, key information for reintroductions is how low BTS abundance will likely need to be for each bird species to be re-established based on their vulnerability to BTS predation. Here, we estimate vulnerability, which can no longer be measured directly, so biologists who are familiar with one or more of seven Guam birds were surveyed to obtain their knowledge and produce quantitative vulnerability estimates. As is typical of birds adapted to islands devoid of predators, respondents judged that our focal species exhibit few predator avoidance and tolerance traits, leaving body size as the prime determinant of vulnerability. Respondent opinion also holds that any behavior that reduces the likelihood of an encounter by BTS, e.g., roosting/nesting in palm crowns, cavity nesting, and in particular urban dwelling, substantially reduces vulnerability. Our results can help inform species-specific decisions about when it may be safe to consider the release of birds on Guam depending on the relative vulnerability of each species to predation by BTS.
Collapse
|
18
|
Towards an ecosystem model of infectious disease. Nat Ecol Evol 2021; 5:907-918. [PMID: 34002048 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01454-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Increasingly intimate associations between human society and the natural environment are driving the emergence of novel pathogens, with devastating consequences for humans and animals alike. Prior to emergence, these pathogens exist within complex ecological systems that are characterized by trophic interactions between parasites, their hosts and the environment. Predicting how disturbance to these ecological systems places people and animals at risk from emerging pathogens-and the best ways to manage this-remains a significant challenge. Predictive systems ecology models are powerful tools for the reconstruction of ecosystem function but have yet to be considered for modelling infectious disease. Part of this stems from a mistaken tendency to forget about the role that pathogens play in structuring the abundance and interactions of the free-living species favoured by systems ecologists. Here, we explore how developing and applying these more complete systems ecology models at a landscape scale would greatly enhance our understanding of the reciprocal interactions between parasites, pathogens and the environment, placing zoonoses in an ecological context, while identifying key variables and simplifying assumptions that underly pathogen host switching and animal-to-human spillover risk. As well as transforming our understanding of disease ecology, this would also allow us to better direct resources in preparation for future pandemics.
Collapse
|
19
|
Heger T, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Bartram I, Braga RR, Dietl GP, Enders M, Gibson DJ, Gómez-Aparicio L, Gras P, Jax K, Lokatis S, Lortie CJ, Mupepele AC, Schindler S, Starrfelt J, Synodinos AD, Jeschke JM. The Hierarchy-of-Hypotheses Approach: A Synthesis Method for Enhancing Theory Development in Ecology and Evolution. Bioscience 2021; 71:337-349. [PMID: 33867867 PMCID: PMC8038874 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In the current era of Big Data, existing synthesis tools such as formal meta-analyses are critical means to handle the deluge of information. However, there is a need for complementary tools that help to (a) organize evidence, (b) organize theory, and (c) closely connect evidence to theory. We present the hierarchy-of-hypotheses (HoH) approach to address these issues. In an HoH, hypotheses are conceptually and visually structured in a hierarchically nested way where the lower branches can be directly connected to empirical results. Used for organizing evidence, this tool allows researchers to conceptually connect empirical results derived through diverse approaches and to reveal under which circumstances hypotheses are applicable. Used for organizing theory, it allows researchers to uncover mechanistic components of hypotheses and previously neglected conceptual connections. In the present article, we offer guidance on how to build an HoH, provide examples from population and evolutionary biology and propose terminological clarifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Heger
- Department of Biodiversity Research and Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Department of Restoration Ecology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlos A Aguilar-Trigueros
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabelle Bartram
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Sociology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - Raul Rennó Braga
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Gregory P Dietl
- Paleontological Research Institution and the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Martin Enders
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany
| | - David J Gibson
- School of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois
| | - Lorena Gómez-Aparicio
- Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, CSIC, LINCGlobal, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Pierre Gras
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), also in Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Jax
- Department of Restoration Ecology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
- Department of Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sophie Lokatis
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Christopher J Lortie
- Department of Biology, York University, York, Canada, as well as with the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Anne-Christine Mupepele
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, and the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, both in Germany
| | - Stefan Schindler
- Environment Agency Austria and University of Vienna's Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation, and Landscape Ecology, Vienna, Austria, and his third affiliation is with Community Ecology and Conservation, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, Finally
| | - Jostein Starrfelt
- University of Oslo's Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis and with the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, both in Oslo, Norway
| | - Alexis D Synodinos
- Department of Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical, and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France
| | - Jonathan M Jeschke
- Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goodsell RM, Childs DZ, Spencer M, Coutts S, Vergnon R, Swinfield T, Queenborough SA, Freckleton RP. Developing hierarchical density‐structured models to study the national‐scale dynamics of an arable weed. ECOL MONOGR 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecm.1449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M. Goodsell
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United Kingdom
| | - Dylan Z. Childs
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Spencer
- School of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 3GP United Kingdom
| | - Shaun Coutts
- Lincoln Institute for Agri‐food Technology University of Lincoln Lincoln LN2 2LG United Kingdom
| | - Remi Vergnon
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United Kingdom
| | - Tom Swinfield
- RSPB Potton road Sandy Bedfordshire SH19 2DL United Kingdom
| | - Simon A. Queenborough
- Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Yale University New Haven Connecticut 06511 USA
| | - Robert P. Freckleton
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Harris WE, de Kort SR, Bettridge CM, Borges J, Cain B, Dulle HI, Fyumagwa R, Gadiye D, Jones M, Kahana L, Kibebe J, Kideghesho JR, Kimario FF, Kisingo A, Makari F, Martin E, Martin A, Masuruli MB, Melubo K, Mossman HL, Munishi L, Mwaya R, Nasi R, Nyakunga O, Price E, Shoo RA, Strange EF, Symeonakis E, Fa JE. A learning network approach to resolve conservation challenges in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area. Afr J Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/aje.12815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Edwin Harris
- Crop and Environment Science Harper Adams University Edgmond UK
| | - Selvino R. de Kort
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | - Caroline M. Bettridge
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | - Joana Borges
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | - Bradley Cain
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | | | | | | | - Martin Jones
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alex Kisingo
- College of African Wildlife Management Mweka Moshi Tanzania
| | | | | | | | | | - Kokel Melubo
- College of African Wildlife Management Mweka Moshi Tanzania
| | - Hannah L. Mossman
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | - Linus Munishi
- Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology Arusha Tanzania
| | - Reginald Mwaya
- College of African Wildlife Management Mweka Moshi Tanzania
| | - Robert Nasi
- Center for International Forestry Research Bogor Indonesia
| | | | - Elizabeth Price
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | - Rehema A. Shoo
- College of African Wildlife Management Mweka Moshi Tanzania
| | - Emily F. Strange
- Institute of Environmental Sciences Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Elias Symeonakis
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
| | - John E. Fa
- Ecology and Environment Research Centre Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK
- Center for International Forestry Research Bogor Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
LaMere K, Mäntyniemi S, Haapasaari P. The effects of climate change on Baltic salmon: Framing the problem in collaboration with expert stakeholders. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 738:140068. [PMID: 32806345 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In the Baltic Sea region, salmon are valued for the ecological, economic, and cultural benefits they provide. However, these fish are threatened due to historical overfishing, disease, and reduced access to spawning rivers. Climate change may pose another challenge for salmon management. Therefore, we conducted a problem-framing study to explore the effects climate change may have on salmon and the socio-ecological system they are embedded within. Addressing this emerging issue will require the cooperation of diverse stakeholders and the integration of their knowledge and values in a contentious management context. Therefore, we conducted this problem framing as a participatory process with stakeholders, whose mental models and questionnaire responses form the basis of this study. By framing the climate change problem in this way, we aim to provide a holistic understanding of the problem and incorporate stakeholder perspectives into the management process from an early stage to better address their concerns and establish common ground. We conclude that considering climate change is relevant for Baltic salmon management, although it may not be the most pressing threat facing these fish. Stakeholders disagree about whether climate change will harm or benefit salmon, when it will become a relevant issue in the Baltic context, and whether or not management efforts can mitigate any negative impacts climate change may have on salmon and their fishery. Nevertheless, by synthesizing the stakeholders' influence diagrams, we found 15 themes exemplifying: (1) how climate change may affect salmon, (2) goals for salmon management considering climate change, and (3) strategies for achieving those goals. Further, the stakeholders tended to focus on the riverine environment and the salmon life stages occurring therein, potentially indicating the perceived vulnerability of these life stages to climate change. Interestingly, however, the stakeholders tended to focus on traditional fishery management measures, like catch quotas, to meet their goals for these fish considering climate change. Further, social variables, like "politics," "international cooperation," and "employment" comprised a large proportion of the stakeholders' diagrams, demonstrating the importance of these factors for salmon management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey LaMere
- Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Biocenter 3, Viikinkaari 3, P.O. Box 65 FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Samu Mäntyniemi
- Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Päivi Haapasaari
- Marine Risk Governance Group, Ecosystems and Environment Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Biocenter 3, Viikinkaari 3, P.O. Box 65 FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
A guide to ecosystem models and their environmental applications. Nat Ecol Evol 2020; 4:1459-1471. [PMID: 32929239 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01298-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Applied ecology has traditionally approached management problems through a simplified, single-species lens. Repeated failures of single-species management have led us to a new paradigm - managing at the ecosystem level. Ecosystem management involves a complex array of interacting organisms, processes and scientific disciplines. Accounting for interactions, feedback loops and dependencies between ecosystem components is therefore fundamental to understanding and managing ecosystems. We provide an overview of the main types of ecosystem models and their uses, and discuss challenges related to modelling complex ecological systems. Existing modelling approaches typically attempt to do one or more of the following: describe and disentangle ecosystem components and interactions; make predictions about future ecosystem states; and inform decision making by comparing alternative strategies and identifying important uncertainties. Modelling ecosystems is challenging, particularly when balancing the desire to represent many components of an ecosystem with the limitations of available data and the modelling objective. Explicitly considering different forms of uncertainty is therefore a primary concern. We provide some recommended strategies (such as ensemble ecosystem models and multi-model approaches) to aid the explicit consideration of uncertainty while also meeting the challenges of modelling ecosystems.
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Lever JJ, van de Leemput IA, Weinans E, Quax R, Dakos V, van Nes EH, Bascompte J, Scheffer M. Foreseeing the future of mutualistic communities beyond collapse. Ecol Lett 2020; 23:2-15. [PMID: 31707763 PMCID: PMC6916369 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Changing conditions may lead to sudden shifts in the state of ecosystems when critical thresholds are passed. Some well-studied drivers of such transitions lead to predictable outcomes such as a turbid lake or a degraded landscape. Many ecosystems are, however, complex systems of many interacting species. While detecting upcoming transitions in such systems is challenging, predicting what comes after a critical transition is terra incognita altogether. The problem is that complex ecosystems may shift to many different, alternative states. Whether an impending transition has minor, positive or catastrophic effects is thus unclear. Some systems may, however, behave more predictably than others. The dynamics of mutualistic communities can be expected to be relatively simple, because delayed negative feedbacks leading to oscillatory or other complex dynamics are weak. Here, we address the question of whether this relative simplicity allows us to foresee a community's future state. As a case study, we use a model of a bipartite mutualistic network and show that a network's post-transition state is indicated by the way in which a system recovers from minor disturbances. Similar results obtained with a unipartite model of facilitation suggest that our results are of relevance to a wide range of mutualistic systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Jelle Lever
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental StudiesUniversity of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190CH‐8057ZurichSwitzerland
- Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementWageningen UniversityP.O. Box 47NL‐6700 AAWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A. van de Leemput
- Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementWageningen UniversityP.O. Box 47NL‐6700 AAWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Els Weinans
- Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementWageningen UniversityP.O. Box 47NL‐6700 AAWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Rick Quax
- Computational Science LabUniversity of AmsterdamNL‐1098 XHAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute of Advanced StudiesUniversity of Amsterdam1012 GCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Vasilis Dakos
- Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM)BioDICée TeamCNRSUniversité de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
| | - Egbert H. van Nes
- Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementWageningen UniversityP.O. Box 47NL‐6700 AAWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Jordi Bascompte
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental StudiesUniversity of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190CH‐8057ZurichSwitzerland
| | - Marten Scheffer
- Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality ManagementWageningen UniversityP.O. Box 47NL‐6700 AAWageningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dade MC, Mitchell MG, McAlpine CA, Rhodes JR. Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach. AMBIO 2019; 48:1116-1128. [PMID: 30474830 PMCID: PMC6722157 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1127-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Positive (synergistic) and negative (trade-off) relationships among ecosystem services are influenced by drivers of change, such as policy interventions and environmental variability, and the mechanisms that link these drivers to ecosystem service outcomes. Failure to account for these drivers and mechanisms can result in poorly informed management decisions and reduced ecosystem service provision. Here, we review the literature to determine the extent to which drivers and mechanisms are considered in assessments of ecosystem service relationships. We show that only 19% of assessments explicitly identify the drivers and mechanisms that lead to ecosystem service relationships. While the proportion of assessments considering drivers has increased over time, most of these studies only implicitly consider the drivers of ecosystem service relationships. We recommend more assessments explicitly identify drivers of trade-offs and synergies, which can be achieved through a greater uptake of causal inference and process-based models, to ensure effective management of ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie C. Dade
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- ARC Centre for Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Matthew G.E. Mitchell
- Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
| | - Clive A. McAlpine
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Rhodes
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- ARC Centre for Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Long-term retrospective assessment of a transmission hotspot for human alveolar echinococcosis in mid-west China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019; 13:e0007701. [PMID: 31469833 PMCID: PMC6742415 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Human alveolar echinococcosis caused by infection with Echinococcus multilocularis is one of the most potentially pathogenic helminthic zoonoses. Transmission occurs involving wildlife cycles typically between fox and small mammal intermediate hosts. In the late 1980s/early 1990s a large focus of human AE was identified in poor upland agricultural communities in south Gansu Province, China. More detailed investigations in 1994–97 expanded community screening and identified key risk factors of dog ownership and landscape type around villages that could support susceptible rodent populations. A crash of the dog population (susceptible domestic definitive host) in the early 1990s appeared to stop transmission. Methodology/Findings We subsequently undertook follow-up eco-epidemiological studies based on human population screening and dog survey, in 2005/6 and in 2014/15. Our observations show a decrease in human AE prevalence, especially marked in the 11–30 year old age category. In 2015, although the dog population had recovered and in addition, forest protection and the reforestation of some areas may have favoured red fox (wild definitive host) population growth, there was no evidence of infection in owned dogs. Conclusions/Significance Those observations suggest that over decades socio-ecological changes resulted in a cascade of factors that exacerbated and then interrupted parasite emergence, with probable elimination of peri-domestic transmission of E. multilocularis in this area, despite the relative proximity of large active transmission foci on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. This study case exemplifies how anthropogenic land use and behavioural changes can modify emergence events and the transmission of endemic zoonotic parasite infections, and subsequently the importance of considering processes over the long-term in a systems approach in order to understand pathogen and disease distribution. Human alveolar echinococcosis caused by infection with Echinococcus multilocularis is one of the most potentially pathogenic helminthic zoonoses. Transmission occurs involving wildlife cycles typically between fox and small mammal intermediate hosts. A large focus of human alveolar echinococcosis was identified in the late 1980s in poor upland agricultural communities in south Gansu Province, China, and has been monitored until 2015. Observations suggest that over decades landscape and socio-ecological changes resulted in a cascade of factors that exacerbated and then interrupted parasite emergence, with probable elimination of peri-domestic transmission of E. multilocularis in this area, despite the relative proximity of large active transmission foci on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. This study case exemplifies how anthropogenic land use and behavioural changes can modify emergence events and the long-term transmission of endemic parasitic infections, and subsequently the importance of considering disease ecology transmission socio-ecosystems in order to understand parasite and disease distribution.
Collapse
|
29
|
Reimer JR, Caswell H, Derocher AE, Lewis MA. Ringed seal demography in a changing climate. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2019; 29:e01855. [PMID: 30672632 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is affecting species' distributions and abundances worldwide. Baseline population estimates, against which future observations may be compared, are necessary if we are to detect ecological change. Arctic sea ice ecosystems are changing rapidly and we lack baseline population estimates for many ice-associated species. Provided we can detect them, changes in Arctic marine ecosystems may be signaled by changes in indicator species such as ringed seals (Pusa hispida). Ringed seal monitoring has provided estimates of survival and fertility rates, but these have not been used for population-level inference. Using matrix population models, we synthesized existing demographic parameters to obtain estimates of historical ringed seal population growth and structure in Amundsen Gulf and Prince Albert Sound, Canada. We then formalized existing hypotheses about the effects of emerging environmental stressors (i.e., earlier spring ice breakup and reduced snow depth) on ringed seal pup survival. Coupling the demographic model to ice and snow forecasts available from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project resulted in projections of ringed seal population size and structure up to the year 2100. These projections showed median declines in population size ranging from 50% to 99%. Corresponding to these projected declines were substantial changes in population structure, with increasing proportions of ringed seal pups and adults and declining proportions of juveniles. We explored if currently collected, harvest-based data could be used to detect the projected changes in population stage structure. Our model suggests that at a present sample size of 100 seals per year, the projected changes in stage structure would only be reliably detected by mid-century, even for the most extreme climate models. This modeling process revealed inconsistencies in existing estimates of ringed seal demographic rates. Mathematical population models such as these can contribute both to understanding past population trends as well as predicting future ones, both of which are necessary if we are to detect and interpret future observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jody R Reimer
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta , T6G 2E9, Canada
- Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G1, Canada
| | - Hal Caswell
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1090, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew E Derocher
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta , T6G 2E9, Canada
| | - Mark A Lewis
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta , T6G 2E9, Canada
- Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gillson L, Biggs H, Smit IPJ, Virah-Sawmy M, Rogers K. Finding Common Ground between Adaptive Management and Evidence-Based Approaches to Biodiversity Conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2018; 34:31-44. [PMID: 30447939 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive management (AM) and evidence-based conservation (EBC) have emerged as major decision-making frameworks for conservation management. AM deals with complexity and the importance of local context in making conservation decisions under conditions of high variability, uncertainty, and rapid environmental and social change. EBC seeks for generality from empirical data and aims to develop and enhance best practice. The goal of this review is to explore opportunities for finding common ground between AM and EBC. We propose a framework for distinguishing the subset of conservation problems that are amenable to an evidence-based approach, based on levels of uncertainty, complexity, and social agreement. We then suggest ways for combining multiple lines of evidence and developing greater opportunities for iteration and co-learning in EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Gillson
- Plant Conservation Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
| | - Harry Biggs
- Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Private Bag X402, Skukuza 1350, South Africa; Current address: PO Box 230, Bathurst 6166, South Africa
| | - Izak P J Smit
- Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Private Bag X402, Skukuza 1350, South Africa; Centre for African Ecology, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Wits 2050, South Africa
| | - Malika Virah-Sawmy
- Geography Department, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Alfred-Rühl-Haus, Rudower Chaussee 16, 12489 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kevin Rogers
- School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Wits 2050, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Improving the Matrix-Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provision—The Case of Regional Land Use Planning under Climate Change in the Region of Halle, Germany. LAND 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/land7020076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
32
|
Bland LM, Regan TJ, Dinh MN, Ferrari R, Keith DA, Lester R, Mouillot D, Murray NJ, Nguyen HA, Nicholson E. Using multiple lines of evidence to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 284:rspb.2017.0660. [PMID: 28931744 PMCID: PMC5627190 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Effective ecosystem risk assessment relies on a conceptual understanding of ecosystem dynamics and the synthesis of multiple lines of evidence. Risk assessment protocols and ecosystem models integrate limited observational data with threat scenarios, making them valuable tools for monitoring ecosystem status and diagnosing key mechanisms of decline to be addressed by management. We applied the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria to quantify the risk of collapse of the Meso-American Reef, a unique ecosystem containing the second longest barrier reef in the world. We collated a wide array of empirical data (field and remotely sensed), and used a stochastic ecosystem model to backcast past ecosystem dynamics, as well as forecast future ecosystem dynamics under 11 scenarios of threat. The ecosystem is at high risk from mass bleaching in the coming decades, with compounding effects of ocean acidification, hurricanes, pollution and fishing. The overall status of the ecosystem is Critically Endangered (plausibly Vulnerable to Critically Endangered), with notable differences among Red List criteria and data types in detecting the most severe symptoms of risk. Our case study provides a template for assessing risks to coral reefs and for further application of ecosystem models in risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie M Bland
- Deakin University, Australia, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Burwood, 3121, Victoria, Australia .,School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tracey J Regan
- The Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, 3084, Victoria, Australia
| | - Minh Ngoc Dinh
- Research Computing Centre, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Queensland, Australia
| | - Renata Ferrari
- Coastal and Marine Ecosystems Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David A Keith
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2052, New South Wales, Australia.,New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, Hurstville, 2220, New South Wales, Australia.,Long Term Ecological Research Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lester
- Deakin University, Australia, Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, Geelong, 3220, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Mouillot
- UMR 5119-Écologie des Systèmes marins côtiers, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.,ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, 4881, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Murray
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2052, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hoang Anh Nguyen
- Research Computing Centre, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Queensland, Australia
| | - Emily Nicholson
- Deakin University, Australia, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Burwood, 3121, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Meyer-Gutbrod EL, Greene CH. Uncertain recovery of the North Atlantic right whale in a changing ocean. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2018; 24:455-464. [PMID: 29084379 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Human activities have placed populations of many endangered species at risk and mitigation efforts typically focus on reducing anthropogenic sources of mortality. However, failing to recognize the additional role of environmental factors in regulating birth and mortality rates can lead to erroneous demographic analyses and conclusions. The North Atlantic right whale population is currently the focus of conservation efforts aimed at reducing mortality rates associated with ship strikes and entanglement in fishing gear. Consistent monitoring of the population since 1980 has revealed evidence that climate-associated changes in prey availability have played an important role in the population's recovery. The considerable interdecadal differences observed in population growth coincide with remote Arctic and North Atlantic oceanographic processes that link to the Gulf of Maine ecosystem. Here, we build capture-recapture models to quantify the role of prey availability on right whale demographic transitional probabilities and use a corresponding demographic model to project population growth rates into the next century. Contrary to previous predictions, the right whale population is projected to recover in the future as long as prey availability and mortality rates remain within the ranges observed during 1980-2012. However, recent events indicate a northward range shift in right whale prey, potentially resulting in decreased prey availability and/or an expansion of right whale habitat into unprotected waters. An annual increase in the number of whale deaths comparable to that observed during the summer 2017 mass mortality event may cause a decline to extinction even under conditions of normal prey availability. This study highlights the importance of understanding the oceanographic context for observed population changes when evaluating the efficacy of conservation management plans for endangered marine species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Meyer-Gutbrod
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Charles H Greene
- Ocean Ecosystems and Resources Program, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hone J, Drake VA, Krebs CJ. Evaluating wildlife management by using principles of applied ecology: case studies and implications. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.1071/wr18006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Context The broad concepts and generalisations that guide conduct of applied ecology, including wildlife management, have been reviewed and synthesised recently into 22 prescriptive and three empirical principles. Aims The aim of this study was to use these principles to evaluate three on-ground wildlife management programs and assess the utility of the principles themselves. Key results Case studies of long-term management of national park biodiversity impacted by feral pigs (Sus scrofa), and of conservation and harvest of red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) and mallards (Anas platyrhnchos), were selected to provide a representative range of management objectives, spatial scales and land tenures, and to include both native and introduced species. Management documents and a considerable scientific literature were available for all three programs. The results highlight similarities and differences among management activities and demonstrate the 25 principles to differing degrees. Most of the prescriptive principles were demonstrated in both the management and the scientific literature in all three programs, but almost no use was made of the three empirical principles. We propose that use of the prescriptive principles constitutes evidence that these programs meet both societal and scientific expectations. However, the limited use of the empirical principles shows gaps in the three programs. Conclusions The results suggest that evaluating other wildlife management programs against the principles of applied ecology is worthwhile and could highlight aspects of those programs that might otherwise be overlooked. Little use was made of the empirical principles, but the the Effort–outcomes principle in particular provides a framework for evaluating management programs. Implications The effort–outcomes relationship should be a focus of future applied research, and both prescriptive and empirical principles should be integrated into wildlife management programs.
Collapse
|
35
|
Maris V, Huneman P, Coreau A, Kéfi S, Pradel R, Devictor V. Prediction in ecology: promises, obstacles and clarifications. OIKOS 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/oik.04655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Maris
- Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5175, 1919 route de Mende; FR-34293 Montpellier Cedex 05 France
| | - Philippe Huneman
- Inst. d'Histoire et Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, CNRS, Univ. Paris I Sorbonne; Paris France
| | - Audrey Coreau
- AgroParisTech, Paris, France, and: Centre Alexandre Koyré, UMR EHESS-CNRS-MNHN 8560; Paris France
| | - Sonia Kéfi
- Inst. des Sciences de l'Evolution, BioDICée team, Univ, de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, CC 065; Montpellier France
| | - Roger Pradel
- Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5175, 1919 route de Mende; FR-34293 Montpellier Cedex 05 France
| | - Vincent Devictor
- Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5175, 1919 route de Mende; FR-34293 Montpellier Cedex 05 France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Udevitz MS, Jay CV, Taylor RL, Fischbach AS, Beatty WS, Noren SR. Forecasting consequences of changing sea ice availability for Pacific walruses. Ecosphere 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Udevitz
- Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage Alaska 99508 USA
| | - Chadwick V. Jay
- Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage Alaska 99508 USA
| | - Rebecca L. Taylor
- Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage Alaska 99508 USA
| | - Anthony S. Fischbach
- Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage Alaska 99508 USA
| | - William S. Beatty
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management 1011 East Tudor Road Anchorage Alaska 99503 USA
| | - Shawn R. Noren
- Institute of Marine Science University of California, Santa Cruz 100 Shaffer Road Santa Cruz California 95060 USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wood KA, Stillman RA, Hilton GM. Conservation in a changing world needs predictive models. Anim Conserv 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K. A. Wood
- Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust; Slimbridge UK
| | - R. A. Stillman
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences; Faculty of Science and Technology; Bournemouth University; Poole UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Golab MJ, Gołąb PA, Contreras-Garduño J, Zając T, Sniegula S. The Effects of Habitat Deterioration and Social Status on Patrolling Behavior in the Territorial DamselflyCalopteryx splendens. POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.3161/15052249pje2017.65.1.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J. Golab
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| | - Paulina A. Gołąb
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Tadeusz Zając
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| | - Szymon Sniegula
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
OWEN MA, SWAISGOOD RR, BLUMSTEIN DT. Contextual influences on animal decision-making: Significance for behavior-based wildlife conservation and management. Integr Zool 2017; 12:32-48. [DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A. OWEN
- Institute for Conservation Research; San Diego Zoo Global; San Diego California USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; University of California; Los Angeles California USA
| | - Ronald R. SWAISGOOD
- Institute for Conservation Research; San Diego Zoo Global; San Diego California USA
| | - Daniel T. BLUMSTEIN
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; University of California; Los Angeles California USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Greenwood O, Mossman HL, Suggitt AJ, Curtis RJ, Maclean IMD. Using in situ management to conserve biodiversity under climate change. J Appl Ecol 2016; 53:885-894. [PMID: 27609987 PMCID: PMC4991270 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Successful conservation will increasingly depend on our ability to help species cope with climate change. While there has been much attention on accommodating or assisting range shifts, less has been given to the alternative strategy of helping species survive climate change through in situ management.Here we provide a synthesis of published evidence examining whether habitat management can be used to offset the adverse impacts on biodiversity of changes in temperature, water availability and sea-level rise. Our focus is on practical methods whereby the local environmental conditions experienced by organisms can be made more suitable.Many studies suggest that manipulating vegetation structure can alter the temperature and moisture conditions experienced by organisms, and several demonstrate that these altered conditions benefit species as regional climatic conditions become unsuitable. The effects of topography on local climatic conditions are even better understood, but the alteration of topography as a climate adaptation tool is not ingrained in conservation practice. Trials of topographic alteration in the field should therefore be a priority for future research.Coastal systems have the natural capacity to keep pace with climate change, but require sufficient sediment supplies and space for landward migration to do so. There is an extensive literature on managed realignment. While the underlying rationale is simple, successful implementation requires careful consideration of elevation and past land use. Even with careful management, restored habitats may not attain the physical and biological attributes of natural habitats. Synthesis and applications. The recent literature provides a compelling case that some of the adverse effects of climate change can be offset by appropriate management. However, much of the evidence for this is indirect and too few studies provide empirical tests of the long-term effectiveness of these management interventions. It is clear from the existing evidence that some techniques have a higher risk of failure or unexpected outcomes than others and managers will need to make careful choices about which to implement. We have assessed the strength of evidence of these approaches in order to demonstrate to conservation professionals the risks involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Greenwood
- Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn TR10 9FE UK
| | - Hannah L Mossman
- School of Science and the Environment Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester M1 5GD UK
| | - Andrew J Suggitt
- Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn TR10 9FE UK
| | - Robin J Curtis
- Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn TR10 9FE UK
| | - Ilya M D Maclean
- Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn TR10 9FE UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stillman RA, Wood KA, Goss-Custard JD. Deriving simple predictions from complex models to support environmental decision-making. Ecol Modell 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Chamberlain DE, Pedrini P, Brambilla M, Rolando A, Girardello M. Identifying key conservation threats to Alpine birds through expert knowledge. PeerJ 2016; 4:e1723. [PMID: 26966659 PMCID: PMC4782807 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Alpine biodiversity is subject to a range of increasing threats, but the scarcity of data for many taxa means that it is difficult to assess the level and likely future impact of a given threat. Expert opinion can be a useful tool to address knowledge gaps in the absence of adequate data. Experts with experience in Alpine ecology were approached to rank threat levels for 69 Alpine bird species over the next 50 years for the whole European Alps in relation to ten categories: land abandonment, climate change, renewable energy, fire, forestry practices, grazing practices, hunting, leisure, mining and urbanization. There was a high degree of concordance in ranking of perceived threats among experts for most threat categories. The major overall perceived threats to Alpine birds identified through expert knowledge were land abandonment, urbanization, leisure and forestry, although other perceived threats were ranked highly for particular species groups (renewable energy and hunting for raptors, hunting for gamebirds). For groups of species defined according to their breeding habitat, open habitat species and treeline species were perceived as the most threatened. A spatial risk assessment tool based on summed scores for the whole community showed threat levels were highest for bird communities of the northern and western Alps. Development of the approaches given in this paper, including addressing biases in the selection of experts and adopting a more detailed ranking procedure, could prove useful in the future in identifying future threats, and in carrying out risk assessments based on levels of threat to the whole bird community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan E Chamberlain
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | | | - Mattia Brambilla
- Sezione Zoologia dei Vertebrati, Museo delle Scienze di Trento, Trento, Italy; Settore biodiversità e aree protette, Fondazione Lombardia per l'Ambiente, Seveso (MB), Italy
| | - Antonio Rolando
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Langhans SD, Lienert J. Four Common Simplifications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis do not hold for River Rehabilitation. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150695. [PMID: 26954353 PMCID: PMC4783037 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
River rehabilitation aims at alleviating negative effects of human impacts such as loss of biodiversity and reduction of ecosystem services. Such interventions entail difficult trade-offs between different ecological and often socio-economic objectives. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a very suitable approach that helps assessing the current ecological state and prioritizing river rehabilitation measures in a standardized way, based on stakeholder or expert preferences. Applications of MCDA in river rehabilitation projects are often simplified, i.e. using a limited number of objectives and indicators, assuming linear value functions, aggregating individual indicator assessments additively, and/or assuming risk neutrality of experts. Here, we demonstrate an implementation of MCDA expert preference assessments to river rehabilitation and provide ample material for other applications. To test whether the above simplifications reflect common expert opinion, we carried out very detailed interviews with five river ecologists and a hydraulic engineer. We defined essential objectives and measurable quality indicators (attributes), elicited the experts´ preferences for objectives on a standardized scale (value functions) and their risk attitude, and identified suitable aggregation methods. The experts recommended an extensive objectives hierarchy including between 54 and 93 essential objectives and between 37 to 61 essential attributes. For 81% of these, they defined non-linear value functions and in 76% recommended multiplicative aggregation. The experts were risk averse or risk prone (but never risk neutral), depending on the current ecological state of the river, and the experts´ personal importance of objectives. We conclude that the four commonly applied simplifications clearly do not reflect the opinion of river rehabilitation experts. The optimal level of model complexity, however, remains highly case-study specific depending on data and resource availability, the context, and the complexity of the decision problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone D. Langhans
- Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland
| | - Judit Lienert
- Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Andrade LP, Silva-Andrade HML, Lyra-Neves RM, Albuquerque UP, Telino-Júnior WR. Do artisanal fishers perceive declining migratory shorebird populations? JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE 2016; 12:16. [PMID: 26939745 PMCID: PMC4778353 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-016-0087-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper discusses the results of ethno-ornithological research conducted on the local ecological knowledge (LEK) of artisanal fishers in northeast Brazil between August 2013 and October 2014. METHODS The present study analyzed the LEK of 240 artisanal fishermen in relation to Nearctic shorebirds and the factors that may be affecting their populations. We examined whether differences occurred according to the gender and age of the local population. The research instruments included semi-structured and check-list interviews. RESULTS We found that greater knowledge of migratory birds and the areas where they occur was retained by the local men compared with the local women. Half of the male respondents stated that the birds are always in the same locations, and most of the respondents believed that changes in certain populations were caused by factors related to habitat disturbance, particularly to increases in housing construction and visitors to the island. The main practices affecting the presence of migratory birds mentioned by the locals were boat traffic and noise from bars and vessels. According to the artisanal fishermen, the population of migratory birds that use the area for foraging and resting has been reduced over time. CONCLUSIONS Changes in the local landscape related to urbanization and tourism are most likely the primary causes underlying the reduced migratory shorebird populations as reported by local inhabitants. Thus, managing and monitoring urbanization and tourism are fundamental to increasing the success of the migration process and improving the conservation of migratory shorebird species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Pires Andrade
- Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation-PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
- Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns Campus, Av. Bom Pastor, s/n, Boa Vista, 55292-270, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| | - Horasa Maria Lima Silva-Andrade
- Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation-PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
- Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns Campus, Av. Bom Pastor, s/n, Boa Vista, 55292-270, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| | - Rachel Maria Lyra-Neves
- Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation-PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
- Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns Campus, Av. Bom Pastor, s/n, Boa Vista, 55292-270, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| | - Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
- Department of Biology, Laboratory of Ecology and Evolutivon of Social-Ecological Systems (LEA), Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| | - Wallace Rodrigues Telino-Júnior
- Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation-PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
- Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Garanhuns Campus, Av. Bom Pastor, s/n, Boa Vista, 55292-270, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Research about ecosystem services (ES) often aims to generate knowledge that influences policies and institutions for conservation and human development. However, we have limited understanding of how decision-makers use ES knowledge or what factors facilitate use. Here we address this gap and report on, to our knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of the factors and conditions that explain the policy impact of ES knowledge. We analyze a global sample of cases where similar ES knowledge was generated and applied to decision-making. We first test whether attributes of ES knowledge themselves predict different measures of impact on decisions. We find that legitimacy of knowledge is more often associated with impact than either the credibility or salience of the knowledge. We also examine whether predictor variables related to the science-to-policy process and the contextual conditions of a case are significant in predicting impact. Our findings indicate that, although many factors are important, attributes of the knowledge and aspects of the science-to-policy process that enhance legitimacy best explain the impact of ES science on decision-making. Our results are consistent with both theory and previous qualitative assessments in suggesting that the attributes and perceptions of scientific knowledge and process within which knowledge is coproduced are important determinants of whether that knowledge leads to action.
Collapse
|
46
|
Tanentzap AJ, Walker S, Theo Stephens RT. Better practices for reporting on conservation. Conserv Lett 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Tanentzap
- Ecosystems and Global Change Group; University of Cambridge; Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EA UK
- Landcare Research; Private Bag 1930 Dunedin New Zealand 9054
| | - Susan Walker
- Landcare Research; Private Bag 1930 Dunedin New Zealand 9054
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Adams-Hosking C, McBride MF, Baxter G, Burgman M, de Villiers D, Kavanagh R, Lawler I, Lunney D, Melzer A, Menkhorst P, Molsher R, Moore BD, Phalen D, Rhodes JR, Todd C, Whisson D, McAlpine CA. Use of expert knowledge to elicit population trends for the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). DIVERS DISTRIB 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Adams-Hosking
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management; Global Change Institute, The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia
| | - Marissa F. McBride
- School of Botany; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. 3010 Australia
- Department of Biosciences; University of Helsinki; Helsinki 00014 Finland
| | - Greg Baxter
- School of Geography Planning and Environmental Management; The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group; Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia
| | - Mark Burgman
- School of Botany, Environmental Science; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. 3010 Australia
| | - Deidre de Villiers
- Endeavour Veterinary Ecology; 1695 Pumicestone Rd Toorbul Qld 4510 Australia
| | - Rodney Kavanagh
- The Australian National University; Research School of Biology; Canberra 0200 Australia; Niche Environment and Heritage; PO Box 2443 North Parramatta NSW 2150 Australia
| | - Ivan Lawler
- Wildlife Heritage and Marine Division; Department of the Environment; Marine and Freshwater Species Conservation Section; Canberra ACT 2700 Australia
| | - Daniel Lunney
- Office of Environment and Heritage NSW; Hurstville NSW 2220 Australia
- School of Biological Sciences; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Alistair Melzer
- Koala Research Centre of Central Queensland; School of Medical and Applied Sciences; CQ University; Rockhampton Qld 4702 Australia
| | - Peter Menkhorst
- Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning; Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research; Heidelberg Vic. 3084 Australia
| | - Robyn Molsher
- Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources; PO Box 39 Kingscote SA 5223 Australia
| | - Ben D. Moore
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment; Western Sydney University; Locked Bag 1797 Penrith 2751 NSW Australia
| | - David Phalen
- Faculty of Veterinary Science; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Rhodes
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia
| | - Charles Todd
- Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning; Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research; Heidelberg Vic. 3084 Australia
| | - Desley Whisson
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences; Faculty of Science Engineering & Built Environment; Deakin University; Burwood Vic. 3125 Australia
| | - Clive A. McAlpine
- Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group; School of Geography, Planning, and Environmental Management; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Comparative Risk Assessment to Inform Adaptation Priorities for the Natural Environment: Observations from the First UK Climate Change Risk Assessment. CLIMATE 2015. [DOI: 10.3390/cli3040937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
49
|
White TH, de Melo Barros Y, Develey PF, Llerandi-Román IC, Monsegur-Rivera OA, Trujillo-Pinto AM. Improving reintroduction planning and implementation through quantitative SWOT analysis. J Nat Conserv 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
50
|
Petchey OL, Pontarp M, Massie TM, Kéfi S, Ozgul A, Weilenmann M, Palamara GM, Altermatt F, Matthews B, Levine JM, Childs DZ, McGill BJ, Schaepman ME, Schmid B, Spaak P, Beckerman AP, Pennekamp F, Pearse IS, Vasseur D. The ecological forecast horizon, and examples of its uses and determinants. Ecol Lett 2015; 18:597-611. [PMID: 25960188 PMCID: PMC4676300 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Forecasts of ecological dynamics in changing environments are increasingly important, and are available for a plethora of variables, such as species abundance and distribution, community structure and ecosystem processes. There is, however, a general absence of knowledge about how far into the future, or other dimensions (space, temperature, phylogenetic distance), useful ecological forecasts can be made, and about how features of ecological systems relate to these distances. The ecological forecast horizon is the dimensional distance for which useful forecasts can be made. Five case studies illustrate the influence of various sources of uncertainty (e.g. parameter uncertainty, environmental variation, demographic stochasticity and evolution), level of ecological organisation (e.g. population or community), and organismal properties (e.g. body size or number of trophic links) on temporal, spatial and phylogenetic forecast horizons. Insights from these case studies demonstrate that the ecological forecast horizon is a flexible and powerful tool for researching and communicating ecological predictability. It also has potential for motivating and guiding agenda setting for ecological forecasting research and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen L Petchey
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyÜberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Mikael Pontarp
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå UniversitySE- 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Thomas M Massie
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sonia Kéfi
- Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, CC065Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - Arpat Ozgul
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maja Weilenmann
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gian Marco Palamara
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Altermatt
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyÜberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Blake Matthews
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Center for Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyKastanienbaum, Seestrasse 79, 6047 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan M Levine
- Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH ZurichUniversitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dylan Z Childs
- Animal and Plant Sciences, Sheffield UniversitySheffield, Western Bank. S10 2TN South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Brian J McGill
- School of Biology and Ecology and Mitchel Center for Sustainability Solutions, University of MaineOrono, 5751 Murray Hall, ME 04469, USA
| | - Michael E Schaepman
- University of Zurich, Department of Geography, Remote Sensing LaboratoriesWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bernhard Schmid
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Piet Spaak
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyÜberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH ZurichUniversitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrew P Beckerman
- Animal and Plant Sciences, Sheffield UniversitySheffield, Western Bank. S10 2TN South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Frank Pennekamp
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ian S Pearse
- The Illinois Natural History SurveyChampaign, 1816 South Oak Street, MC 652, IL 61820, USA
| | - David Vasseur
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of ZurichWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyÜberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå UniversitySE- 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
- Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, CC065Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Center for Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologyKastanienbaum, Seestrasse 79, 6047 Luzern, Switzerland
- Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH ZurichUniversitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
- Animal and Plant Sciences, Sheffield UniversitySheffield, Western Bank. S10 2TN South Yorkshire, UK
- School of Biology and Ecology and Mitchel Center for Sustainability Solutions, University of MaineOrono, 5751 Murray Hall, ME 04469, USA
- University of Zurich, Department of Geography, Remote Sensing LaboratoriesWinterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- The Illinois Natural History SurveyChampaign, 1816 South Oak Street, MC 652, IL 61820, USA
| |
Collapse
|