1
|
Britton CR, Rathinam S, Birchall M, Iles-Smith H, Krishnamoorthy B. Barriers to research progress for perioperative care practitioners working in cardiothoracic surgery. J Perioper Pract 2024; 34:146-153. [PMID: 37381834 DOI: 10.1177/17504589231176388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Policy and research literature worldwide support the need to build research capacity and capability among non-medical practitioners within healthcare systems. However, there exists a paucity of evidence on whether practitioners in cardiothoracic surgery are attuned to this and on what barriers or enablers exist. A survey was carried out with non-medical practitioners working in cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom to explore attitudes towards health research and audit, and to identify current challenges and barriers to surgical research and audit as perceived by cardiothoracic nurses and allied health professionals. A total of 160 completed questionnaires were returned. 99% of respondents supported the need for research and believed that evidence-based surgical care improves outcomes for patients. Seventy-two percent reported that their employer motivates them to take part in national research or audit but, only 22% were allocated time to do so within their role; 96% reported their interest in being involved in research and audit, yet only 30% believed they had the skills to undertake research, and 96% reported needing additional training. More work is needed to increase awareness, capacity and capability among cardiothoracic surgery care practitioners, and indeed other specialities to achieve research progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Heather Iles-Smith
- Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thomas A, Rochette A, George C, Iqbal MZ, Ataman R, St-Onge C, Boruff J, Renaud JS. The Definitions and Conceptualizations of the Practice Context in the Health Professions: A Scoping Review. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2023; 43:S18-S29. [PMID: 36877816 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health care professionals work in different contexts, which can influence professional competencies. Despite existing literature on the impact of context on practice, the nature and influence of contextual characteristics, and how context is defined and measured, remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to map the breadth and depth of the literature on how context is defined and measured and the contextual characteristics that may influence professional competencies. METHODS A scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO). Our inclusion criteria were studies that reported on context or relationships between contextual characteristics and professional competencies or that measured context. We extracted data on context definitions, context measures and their psychometric properties, and contextual characteristics influencing professional competencies. We performed numerical and qualitative analyses. RESULTS After duplicate removal, 9106 citations were screened and 283 were retained. We compiled a list of 67 context definitions and 112 available measures, with or without psychometric properties. We identified 60 contextual factors and organized them into five themes: Leadership and Agency, Values, Policies, Supports, and Demands. DISCUSSION Context is a complex construct that covers a wide array of dimensions. Measures are available, but none include the five dimensions in one single measure or focus on items targeting the likelihood of context influencing several competencies. Given that the practice context plays a critical role in health care professionals' competencies, stakeholders from all sectors (education, practice, and policy) should work together to address those contextual characteristics that can adversely influence practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliki Thomas
- Dr. Thomas: Associate Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Research Scientist, Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada . Dr. Rochette: Professor, Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en défience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Ms. George: School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Iqbal: Post-doctoral fellow, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Ms. Ataman: School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. St-Onge: Professor, Department of Medicine and Center for Health Professions Pedagogy, Université de Sherbrooke. Paul Grand'Maison de la Société des Médecins de l'Université de Sherbrooke - Research Chair in Medical Education, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. Ms. Boruff, Associate Librarian, Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Renaud: Professor, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, VITAM Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malley J, Bauer A, Boaz A, Kendrick H, Knapp M. Theory-based evaluation of three research-practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a 'layered' contributions analysis and realist evaluation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e068651. [PMID: 36428022 PMCID: PMC9703321 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) are long-term collaborations between research and practice that aim to conduct research that can be used to make practice-based improvements. They intentionally bring together diverse experience in decision making and seek to shift power dynamics so that all partners have a say. The Creating Care Partnerships project aims to explore whether the RPP approach developed within the US educational context can be successfully applied to the English care home context. The project involves a programme of codesign, implementation and evaluation within three case study sites. This protocol set outs the aims, research design and governance of the evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The evaluation takes a theory-based approach to explore how, why and in what circumstances RPPs in the care home context contribute to enhancing research and research use in local care homes and informing wider improvement efforts. A mixed-methods design will be used for each case study, including semistructured interviews, observations of RPP events and meetings, an online survey, activity diary and review of local data and documents. Data collection will proceed in waves, with the theory of change (ToC) being continually refined and used to guide further data collection and analysis. Insights will be drawn using Contribution Analysis, Realist Evaluation and systems perspectives to assess the contribution made by the case study sites to achieving outcomes and the influence of contextual factors. Economic consequences will be identified through the ToC, using a narrative economic analysis to assess costs, consequences and value for money. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has undergone ethics review by HRA Research Ethics Committee. It does not pose major ethical issues. A final report will be published and articles will be submitted to international journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Malley
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Annette Bauer
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Annette Boaz
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hannah Kendrick
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lieschke G, Giles M, Ball J, Ohr SO, Parker V. Towards translational research participation for nurses and midwives: a mixed method study. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:50. [PMID: 35216594 PMCID: PMC8876089 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00818-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nurses’ and midwives’ participation in research has to date been highly variable and dependent on context and culture. A changing landscape that values and endorses research translation requires examination of who is participating in research and how, with an evaluation of current individual and organizational research capacity. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the existing research capacity amongst nurses and midwives in a large Local Health District in New South Wales, Australia to inform the development of a nuanced capacity building programme directed toward building a sustainable embedded research culture. Methods A sequential mixed methods study design. Phase one, the exploratory phase, involved an online survey of all nurses and midwives (n = 8156) working in metropolitan, rural, and remote health services across the District. The survey measured research activity, skills, intention, value and relevance, organisational support, capability and culture, and research translation. Phase two, the explanatory phase, involved six focus groups with senior nursing and midwifery clinicians, educators, and unit managers, with discussion centred on the results of Phase one. Results A total of 721 (88%) nurses and 95 (12%) midwives completed the online survey, 33 senior nurses and midwives attended focus groups. The nature and extent of research participation is variable across sites, individuals and clinical specialties. In many cases, interest and involvement in research is not sustained. Participants identified the need for greater incentives and structural support. Most important was the need for research to have tangible meaning for patients and clinical practice. Conclusion / implications for practice Our findings suggest that translational research offers nurses and midwives the opportunity to engage in research in a way that is meaningful to their practice and their aspirations. Greater emphasis is needed on the development and enactment of context specific nursing and midwifery research agendas and implementation research skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gena Lieschke
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia. .,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| | - Michelle Giles
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Jean Ball
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia
| | - Se Ok Ohr
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Vicki Parker
- Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of New England, Elm Avenue, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Construct Validity and Reliability of the Revised Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs (PANESS) Gaits and Stations Measures. JOURNAL OF MOTOR LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1123/jmld.2020-0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To facilitate precise diagnosis and provide tailored treatment of postural anomalies in the pediatric population, appropriate assessments are essential. In light of the multicomponent structure of postural control, understanding underlying constructs of an assessment is valuable in selecting and interpreting assessments. This study investigates the construct validity of the Gaits and Stations variables in the Revised Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs, a measure used to evaluate standing postural control in youth with mild neurological deficits. Methods: Data were included from 350 healthy participants ages 10–19 years old. An exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation was performed. Individual loadings of ≥0.4 were used for factor designation. Results: Three latent factors were identified and labeled, based on evidence, as dynamic stability, movement strategies/coordination, and underlying motor systems—musculoskeletal strength. Conclusions: These brief, easily administered Gaits and Stations measures of the Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs facilitate evaluation of three constructs of standing postural control relevant to youth with mild neuromotor impairments. This information will potentially assist in clinical practice to identify youth with postural control deficits and establish developmentally appropriate interventions and in research to refine understanding of pathology and the impact on components of postural control.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hollis R, Ersser SJ, Iles-Smith H, Milnes LJ, Munyombwe T, Sanders C, Swallow V. A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital. J Multidiscip Healthc 2019; 12:935-945. [PMID: 31819468 PMCID: PMC6875253 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s218630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aims were: (i) to convert the Research and Development Culture Index (a validated rating instrument for assessing the strength of organizational Research and Development culture) into electronic format (eR&DCI), and (ii) to test the format and assess the feasibility of administering it to the multidisciplinary (allied health professionals, doctors and nurses) workforce in a National Health Service Hospital (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK) by trialing it with the workforce of the tertiary Children’s Hospital within the organization. Population and methods The eR&DCI was emailed to all professional staff (n=907) in the Children’s Hospital. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Results The eR&DCI was completed by 155 respondents (doctors n=38 (24.52%), nurses n=79 (50.96%) and allied health professionals (AHPs) n=38 (24.52%)). The response rate varied by professional group: responses were received from 79 out of 700 nurses (11%); 38 out of 132 doctors (29%) and 38 out of 76 AHPs (50%). Index scores demonstrated a positive research culture within the multidisciplinary workforce. Survey responses demonstrated differences between the professions related to research training and engagement in formal research activities. Conclusion This is the first study to assess the feasibility of assessing the strength of an organization’s multidisciplinary workforce research and development (R&D) culture by surveying that workforce using the eR&DCI. We converted the index to “Online Surveys” and successfully administered it to the entire multidisciplinary workforce in the Children’s Hospital. We met our criteria for feasibility: ability to administer the survey and a response rate comparable with similar studies. Uptake could have been increased by also offering the option of the paper-based index for self-administration. Results of the survey are informing delivery of the research strategy in the Children’s Hospital. This methodology has potential application in other healthcare contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Hollis
- The Children's Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Heather Iles-Smith
- Research and Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Cilla Sanders
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mustafa K, Murray CC, Nicklin E, Glaser A, Andrews J. Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2018; 18:165. [PMID: 30005649 PMCID: PMC6044020 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers and facilitators for research involvement among paediatric trainees who are going to fill these consultant posts in the future. METHODS A questionnaire based on a validated index for research and development was completed by 136 paediatric trainees within a region in the North of England (Yorkshire and Humber). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with stratified purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test for independence were used for quantitative analysis. Thematic content analysis was done for interviews based on analysis method framework. RESULTS 136 out of 396 trainees responded to the survey. There was a significant relationship between confidence in using research in practice and ability to understand research terminology. This was not related to research experience or training. Males were significantly more likely to have presented a research paper, know how research influences practice and have more confidence in using research in practice than females. There was no significant relationship between gender and research training or highest qualification. Time constraints and lack of academic culture were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the survey. Over-arching themes identified from the interviews were related to lack of academic culture, opportunities provided in current training scheme and constraints related to time availability along with workforce management. CONCLUSION Paediatric research requires a supportive academic culture with more flexibility in training scheme and immediate attention to a pressing staffing crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emma Nicklin
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Leeds, UK
| | - Adam Glaser
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology,, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pau A, Omar H, Khan S, Jassim A, Seow LL, Toh CG. Factors associated with faculty participation in research activities in dental schools. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 38:45-54. [PMID: 29229074 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdj.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2015] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To quantify participation in dental research activities in Malaysia, and investigate its association with socio-demographic and professional characteristics, and perceptions of research and development (R&D) culture. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dental academics in Malaysian dental schools were invited to complete a questionnaire by email and post. The survey comprised questions on research activities in the past 12 months, socio-demographic and professional characteristics, and the R&D Culture Index. Principal components factor analysis was carried out to confirm the factor structure of the R&D Culture Index. Chi-square test was used to identify association of research activities with R&D culture, and socio-demographic and professional characteristics. Binary logistic regression was carried to identify predicators of research activities. RESULTS Of 256 potential participants contacted, 128 (50%) useable responses were returned. Three R&D Culture factors accounting for 57.4% of variance were extracted. More positive perception of R&D Support was associated with Malaysians (0.025) and those employed in Government schools (0.017). R&D Skills and Aptitude were associated with older respondents (0.050), PhD qualification (0.014) and more years in academia (0.014). R&D Intention was associated with any of the socio-demographic characteristics. Thirty (23.4%) respondents reported a peer-review research publication in the past 12 months, which was associated with having a PhD (OR 12.79, CI 1.28-127.96), after adjustment in regression analyses. DISCUSSION Postgraduate research training should be encouraged to promote participation in research activities. R&D culture did not appear to impact on research productivity. Other factors such as individual attitudinal interests should be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Pau
- International Medical University, No. 126, Jln Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Hanan Omar
- International Medical University, No. 126, Jln Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Saad Khan
- International Medical University, No. 126, Jln Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Ammar Jassim
- Missouri School of Dental and Oral Health, A T Still University, USA.
| | - Liang Lin Seow
- International Medical University, No. 126, Jln Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Chooi Gait Toh
- International Medical University, No. 126, Jln Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parker V, Lieschke G, Giles M. Ground-up-top down: a mixed method action research study aimed at normalising research in practice for nurses and midwives. BMC Nurs 2017; 16:52. [PMID: 28919839 PMCID: PMC5596929 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-017-0249-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improving health, patient and system outcomes through a practice-based research agenda requires infrastructural supports, leadership and capacity building approaches, at both the individual and organisational levels. Embedding research as normal nursing and midwifery practice requires a flexible approach that is responsive to the diverse clinical contexts within which care is delivered and the variable research skills and interest of clinicians. This paper reports the study protocol for research being undertaken in a Local Health District (LHD) in New South Wales (NSW) Australia. The study aims to evaluate existing nursing and midwifery research activity, culture, capacity and capability across the LHD. This information, in addition to input from key stakeholders will be used to develop a responsive, productive and sustainable research capacity building framework aimed at enculturating practice-based research activities within and across diverse clinical settings of the LHD. Methods A three-phased, sequential mixed-methods action research design underpinned by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Participants will be nursing and midwifery clinicians and managers across rural and metropolitan services. A combination of survey, focus group, individual interviews and peer supported action-learning groups will be used to gather data. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation and regression, together with thematic analysis of qualitative data to produce an integrated report. Discussion Understanding the current research activity and capacity of nurses and midwives, together with organisational supports and culture is essential to developing a productive and sustainable research environment. However, knowledge alone will not bring about change. This study will move beyond description of barriers to research participation for nurses and midwives and the promulgation of various capacity building frameworks to employ a theory driven action-oriented approach to normalisation of nursing and midwifery research practice. In doing so, our aim is to make possible the utilisation, generation and translation of practice based research that informs improved patient and service delivery outcomes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12912-017-0249-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Parker
- School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, 2351 NSW Australia.,Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia
| | - Gena Lieschke
- Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia
| | - Michelle Giles
- Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neurosurgery in Lebanon: History, Development, and Future Challenges. World Neurosurg 2017; 99:524-532. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2016] [Revised: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
11
|
Evans JM, Grudniewicz A, Baker GR, Wodchis WP. Organizational Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Review of Measurement Tools. Eval Health Prof 2016; 39:391-420. [PMID: 27664122 DOI: 10.1177/0163278716665882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The success of integrated care interventions is highly dependent on the internal and collective capabilities of the organizations in which they are implemented. Yet, organizational capabilities are rarely described, understood, or measured with sufficient depth and breadth in empirical studies or in practice. Assessing these capabilities can contribute to understanding why some integrated care interventions are more effective than others. We identified, organized, and assessed survey instruments that measure the internal and collective organizational capabilities required for integrated care delivery. We conducted an expert consultation and searched Medline and Google Scholar databases for survey instruments measuring factors outlined in the Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care Framework. A total of 58 instruments were included in the review and assessed based on their psychometric properties, practical considerations, and applicability to integrated care efforts. This study provides a bank of psychometrically sound instruments for describing and comparing organizational capabilities. Greater use of these instruments across integrated care interventions and studies can enhance standardized comparative analyses and inform change management. Further research is needed to build an evidence base for these instruments and to explore the associations between organizational capabilities and integrated care processes and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna M Evans
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada .,Enhanced Program Evaluation Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gullick JG, West SH. Building research capacity and productivity among advanced practice nurses: an evaluation of the Community of Practice model. J Adv Nurs 2015; 72:605-19. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.12850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Janice G. Gullick
- Sydney Nursing School; University of Sydney; New South Wales Australia
| | - Sandra H. West
- Sydney Nursing School; University of Sydney; New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bäck-Pettersson S, Jensen KP, Kylén S, Sernert N, Hermansson E. Nurses' experiences of participation in a research and development programme. J Clin Nurs 2012; 22:1103-11. [PMID: 23170875 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04297.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To describe clinical nurses' experience of participating in a Research and Development (R&D) programme and its influence on their research interest and ability to conduct and apply nursing research. BACKGROUND To stimulate nurses' research interest and to overcome barriers for building research capacity in nursing, there is a need for sustainable research programmes. A two-year programme was designed for nurses, to take part in both an academic education for master and research seminars and workshops to conduct a research project from idea to publication. DESIGN A qualitative approach using using focus group interviews. METHODS Registered nurses (n=12) with a bachelor's degree in nursing, participated. Data were collected in focus group interviews, after one year and when the programme ended. Content analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS The findings consist of two themes: being a traveller in the world of nursing research, which included three categories, and experiencing professional growth as a result of nursing research training, in both cases focusing on the experience of students involved in a cohesive programme which included four categories: discovering new dimensions of clinical nursing practice; selected and confirmed; supported by professional others; development of professional self-concept. CONCLUSIONS To support early career researchers, there is a need for strong leadership, an organisational and supportive infrastructure underpinning research capability building in nurses. In this context, research strategies, programmes and collaboration between leaders of academia and clinical institutions appear to be essential. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The R&D programme illustrates an effective way of stimulating nurses' lifelong learning by building the capacity to conduct and apply nursing research in clinical practice. The structure of the programme can be used as a model in other contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siv Bäck-Pettersson
- Department of Research and Development, NU-Hospital Organisation, Sweden and Primary Health Care Research Development and Education Centre, Trollhättan, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Erci B. Psychometric evaluation of women's efficiency scale in family decision-making. Health Care Women Int 2012; 33:775-86. [PMID: 22891738 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2011.645961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The researcher's aim was to develop a women's efficiency scale in family decision-making and evaluate its psychometric properties. A convenience sample of 540 married women at five primary health care centers completed a structured questionnaire in 2007. In the assessment of construct validity, one factor explained 47.9% of the total variance. The internal reliability coefficient of this one factor-based scale was 0.78, and all items of factor loadings were above 0.40. In this study, evidence is provided for the women's efficiency scale in family decision-making's validity, reliability, and acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behice Erci
- Nursing Department, Malatya Health School, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jamerson PA, Vermeersch P. The role of the nurse research facilitator in building research capacity in the clinical setting. J Nurs Adm 2012; 42:21-7. [PMID: 22157378 DOI: 10.1097/nna.0b013e31823c180e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
With little guidance in the literature regarding best practices, clinical institutions have used different organizational models to meet the challenges of building research capacity. This article provides recommendations regarding the most productive models based on review of historical clinical research facilitation models and the results of a survey regarding extant models conducted among research facilitators who were members of the Midwest Nursing Research Society.
Collapse
|
16
|
Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Scott S, Cummings GG, Kang SH, Midodzi WK, Stevens B. Assessment of variation in the Alberta Context Tool: the contribution of unit level contextual factors and specialty in Canadian pediatric acute care settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:251. [PMID: 21970404 PMCID: PMC3200177 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2011] [Accepted: 10/04/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are few validated measures of organizational context and none that we located are parsimonious and address modifiable characteristics of context. The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) was developed to meet this need. The instrument assesses 8 dimensions of context, which comprise 10 concepts. The purpose of this paper is to report evidence to further the validity argument for ACT. The specific objectives of this paper are to: (1) examine the extent to which the 10 ACT concepts discriminate between patient care units and (2) identify variables that significantly contribute to between-unit variation for each of the 10 concepts. Methods 859 professional nurses (844 valid responses) working in medical, surgical and critical care units of 8 Canadian pediatric hospitals completed the ACT. A random intercept, fixed effects hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) strategy was used to quantify and explain variance in the 10 ACT concepts to establish the ACT's ability to discriminate between units. We ran 40 models (a series of 4 models for each of the 10 concepts) in which we systematically assessed the unique contribution (i.e., error variance reduction) of different variables to between-unit variation. First, we constructed a null model in which we quantified the variance overall, in each of the concepts. Then we controlled for the contribution of individual level variables (Model 1). In Model 2, we assessed the contribution of practice specialty (medical, surgical, critical care) to variation since it was central to construction of the sampling frame for the study. Finally, we assessed the contribution of additional unit level variables (Model 3). Results The null model (unadjusted baseline HLM model) established that there was significant variation between units in each of the 10 ACT concepts (i.e., discrimination between units). When we controlled for individual characteristics, significant variation in the 10 concepts remained. Assessment of the contribution of specialty to between-unit variation enabled us to explain more variance (1.19% to 16.73%) in 6 of the 10 ACT concepts. Finally, when we assessed the unique contribution of the unit level variables available to us, we were able to explain additional variance (15.91% to 73.25%) in 7 of the 10 ACT concepts. Conclusion The findings reported here represent the third published argument for validity of the ACT and adds to the evidence supporting its use to discriminate patient care units by all 10 contextual factors. We found evidence of relationships between a variety of individual and unit-level variables that explained much of this between-unit variation for each of the 10 ACT concepts. Future research will include examination of the relationships between the ACT's contextual factors and research utilization by nurses and ultimately the relationships between context, research utilization, and outcomes for patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Newman EF, McKenzie K. Research Activity in British Clinical Psychology Training Staff: Do We Lead by Example? PSYCHOLOGY LEARNING AND TEACHING-PLAT 2011. [DOI: 10.2304/plat.2011.10.3.228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Sixty-two members of staff from clinical psychology doctoral training programmes across Britain completed a survey about their level of research output, the extent to which they felt this met their own expectations and job requirements, and how it influenced promotion prospects. In addition, they listed perceived barriers to and facilitators of research activity. There was wide variation in research activity, such that many participants had limited or no publications while a smaller proportion had many. Respondents were as, or more, dissatisfied than satisfied with their publications, submissions and grant applications and over half felt that the number of grant applications failed to meet their expectations. Support from and collaboration with colleagues was the main facilitator for research, while a lack of time was viewed as the main barrier.
Collapse
|
18
|
Tsai Y. Relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:98. [PMID: 21569537 PMCID: PMC3123547 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2010] [Accepted: 05/14/2011] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Organizational culture refers to the beliefs and values that have existed in an organization for a long time, and to the beliefs of the staff and the foreseen value of their work that will influence their attitudes and behavior. Administrators usually adjust their leadership behavior to accomplish the mission of the organization, and this could influence the employees' job satisfaction. It is therefore essential to understand the relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction of employees. Methods A cross-sectional study was undertaken that focused on hospital nurses in Taiwan. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire; 300 questionnaires were distributed and 200 valid questionnaires were returned. To test the reliability of the data, they were analyzed by Cronbach's α and confirmatory factors. Correlation analysis was used on the relationships between organizational cultures, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. Results Organizational cultures were significantly (positively) correlated with leadership behavior and job satisfaction, and leadership behavior was significantly (positively) correlated with job satisfaction. Conclusions The culture within an organization is very important, playing a large role in whether it is a happy and healthy environment in which to work. In communicating and promoting the organizational ethos to employees, their acknowledgement and acceptance of it can influence their work behavior and attitudes. When the interaction between the leadership and employees is good, the latter will make a greater contribution to team communication and collaboration, and will also be encouraged to accomplish the mission and objectives assigned by the organization, thereby enhancing job satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yafang Tsai
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Chung Shan Medical University; Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beebe L, Adams S, El-Mallakh P. Putting the "evidence" in evidence-based practice: meeting research challenges in community psychiatric settings. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2011; 32:537-43. [PMID: 21767256 DOI: 10.3109/01612840.2011.573124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Every psychiatric client deserves access to treatments that have evidence of efficacy, but in psychiatric nursing, this evidence remains sparse. To address this deficit, researchers must commit to conducting high quality, community-based psychiatric nursing intervention investigations. In service of this goal, the authors draw upon their research experiences in community psychiatric settings to suggest options for overcoming system-, clinician-, and client-related research barriers in community psychiatric settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lora Beebe
- University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4180, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
O’Byrne L, Smith S. Models to enhance research capacity and capability in clinical nurses: a narrative review. J Clin Nurs 2010; 20:1365-71. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03282.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
21
|
French B, Thomas LH, Baker P, Burton CR, Pennington L, Roddam H. What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context. Implement Sci 2009; 4:28. [PMID: 19454008 PMCID: PMC2694144 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2008] [Accepted: 05/19/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the current emphasis on networks as vehicles for innovation and change in health service delivery, the ability to conceptualize and measure organisational enablers for the social construction of knowledge merits attention. This study aimed to develop a composite tool to measure the organisational context for evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare. METHODS A structured search of the major healthcare and management databases for measurement tools from four domains: research utilisation (RU), research activity (RA), knowledge management (KM), and organisational learning (OL). Included studies were reports of the development or use of measurement tools that included organisational factors. Tools were appraised for face and content validity, plus development and testing methods. Measurement tool items were extracted, merged across the four domains, and categorised within a constructed framework describing the absorptive and receptive capacities of organisations. RESULTS Thirty measurement tools were identified and appraised. Eighteen tools from the four domains were selected for item extraction and analysis. The constructed framework consists of seven categories relating to three core organisational attributes of vision, leadership, and a learning culture, and four stages of knowledge need, acquisition of new knowledge, knowledge sharing, and knowledge use. Measurement tools from RA or RU domains had more items relating to the categories of leadership, and acquisition of new knowledge; while tools from KM or learning organisation domains had more items relating to vision, learning culture, knowledge need, and knowledge sharing. There was equal emphasis on knowledge use in the different domains. CONCLUSION If the translation of evidence into knowledge is viewed as socially mediated, tools to measure the organisational context of EBP in healthcare could be enhanced by consideration of related concepts from the organisational and management sciences. Comparison of measurement tools across domains suggests that there is scope within EBP for supplementing the current emphasis on human and technical resources to support information uptake and use by individuals. Consideration of measurement tools from the fields of KM and OL shows more content related to social mechanisms to facilitate knowledge recognition, translation, and transfer between individuals and groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverley French
- School of Nursing and Caring Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, England, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Lois H Thomas
- School of Nursing and Caring Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, England, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Paula Baker
- Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, England, M8 5RB, UK
| | - Christopher R Burton
- Centre for Health-Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales, LL57 2EF, UK
| | - Lindsay Pennington
- School of Clinical Medical Sciences (Child Health), University of Newcastle, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Hazel Roddam
- School of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, England, PR1 2HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Glynn LG, O'Riordan C, MacFarlane A, Newell J, Iglesias AA, Whitford D, Cantillon P, Murphy AW. Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2009; 10:33. [PMID: 19432990 PMCID: PMC2684072 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2008] [Accepted: 05/11/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite increased investment in primary care research and development (R&D), the level of engagement of primary healthcare professionals with research remains poor. The aim of this study is to assess the level of research activity and capacity for research among primary healthcare professionals in a health authority of over one million people in a mixed urban/rural setting in the West of Ireland. Methods A questionnaire, incorporating the R+D Culture Index, was sent to primary healthcare professionals in the HSE Western Region. Baseline characteristics were analysed with the use of one-way ANOVA and Chi-square test and the dependence of R&D Culture Index score on all sixteen available covariates was examined using multiple regression and regression tree modelling. Results There was a 54% response rate to the questionnaire. Primary healthcare professionals appeared to have an interest in and awareness of the importance of research in primary care but just 15% were found to be research active in this study. A more positive attitude towards an R&D culture was associated with having had previous research training, being currently involved in research and with not being a general practitioner (GP) (p < 0.001), but much variability in the R&D culture index score remained unexplained. Conclusion Despite awareness of the importance of R&D in primary care and investment therein, primary healthcare professionals remain largely unengaged with the R&D process. This study highlights the issues that need to be addressed in order to encourage a shift towards a culture of R&D in primary care: lack of research training particularly in basic research skills and increased opportunities for research involvement. The use of the R&D Culture Index may enable groups to be identified that may be more research interested and can therefore be targeted in any future R&D strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam G Glynn
- Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tooher RL, Middleton PF, Crowther CA. A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8:36. [PMID: 18687110 PMCID: PMC2532678 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2007] [Accepted: 08/07/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment of eligible participants remains one of the biggest challenges to successful completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Only one third of trials recruit on time, often requiring a lengthy extension to the recruitment period. We identified factors influencing recruitment success and potentially effective recruitment strategies. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to December Week 2, 2006, the Cochrane Library Methodology Register in December 2006, and hand searched reference lists for studies of any design which focused on recruitment to maternal/perinatal trials, or if no studies of maternal or perinatal research could be identified, other areas of healthcare. Studies of nurses' and midwives' attitudes to research were included as none specifically about trials were located. We synthesised the data narratively, using a basic thematic analysis, with themes derived from the literature and after discussion between the authors. RESULTS Around half of the included papers (29/53) were specific to maternal and perinatal healthcare. Only one study was identified which focused on factors for maternal and perinatal clinicians and only seven studies considered recruitment strategies specific to perinatal research. Themes included: participant assessment of risk; recruitment process; participant understanding of research; patient characteristics; clinician attitudes to research and trials; protocol issues; and institutional or organisational issues. While no reliable evidence base for strategies to enhance recruitment was identified in any of the review studies, four maternal/perinatal primary studies suggest that specialised recruitment staff, mass mailings, physician referrals and strategies targeting minority women may increase recruitment. However these findings may only be applicable to the particular trials and settings studied. CONCLUSION Although factors reported by both participants and clinicians which influence recruitment were quite consistent across the included studies, studies comparing different recruitment strategies were largely missing. Trials of different recruitment strategies could be embedded in large multicentre RCTs, with strategies tailored to the factors specific to the trial and institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Tooher
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Philippa F Middleton
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Caroline A Crowther
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McNICHOLL MARYP, COATES VIVIEN, DUNNE KATHLEEN. Driving towards an improved research and development culture. J Nurs Manag 2008; 16:344-51. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00827.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|