Morphine but not Naloxone Enhances Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Neuronal Responsiveness to Norepinephrine

Co-Evolution of Opioid and Adrenergic Ligands and Receptors: Shared, Complementary Modules Explain Evolution of Functional Interactions and Suggest Novel Engineering Possibilities

Cross-talk between opioid and adrenergic receptors is well-characterized and involves second messenger systems, the formation of receptor heterodimers, and the presence of extracellular allosteric binding regions for the complementary ligand; however, the evolutionary origins of these interactions have not been investigated. We propose that opioid and adrenergic ligands and receptors co-evolved from a common set of modular precursors so that they share binding functions. We demonstrate the plausibility of this hypothesis through a review of experimental evidence for molecularly complementary modules and report unexpected homologies between the two receptor types. Briefly, opioids form homodimers also bind adrenergic compounds; opioids bind to conserved extracellular regions of adrenergic receptors while adrenergic compounds bind to conserved extracellular regions of opioid receptors; opioid-like modules appear in both sets of receptors within key ligand-binding regions. Transmembrane regions associated with homodimerization of each class of receptors are also highly conserved across receptor types and implicated in heterodimerization. This conservation of multiple functional modules suggests opioid–adrenergic ligand and receptor co-evolution and provides mechanisms for explaining the evolution of their crosstalk. These modules also suggest the structure of a primordial receptor, providing clues for engineering receptor functions.

Mutual Enhancement of Opioid and Adrenergic Receptors by Combinations of Opioids and Adrenergic Ligands Is Reflected in Molecular Complementarity of Ligands: Drug Development Possibilities

Crosstalk between opioid and adrenergic receptors is well characterized and due to interactions between second messenger systems, formation of receptor heterodimers, and extracellular allosteric binding regions. Both classes of receptors bind both sets of ligands. We propose here that receptor crosstalk may be mirrored in ligand complementarity. We demonstrate that opioids bind to adrenergic compounds with micromolar affinities. Additionally, adrenergic compounds bind with micromolar affinities to extracellular loops of opioid receptors while opioids bind to extracellular loops of adrenergic receptors. Thus, each compound type can bind to the complementary receptor, enhancing the activity of the other compound type through an allosteric mechanism. Screening for ligand complementarity may permit the identification of other mutually-enhancing sets of compounds as well as the design of novel combination drugs or tethered compounds with improved duration and specificity of action.

Adrenergic Agonists Bind to Adrenergic-Receptor-Like Regions of the Mu Opioid Receptor, Enhancing Morphine and Methionine-Enkephalin Binding: A New Approach to "Biased Opioids"?

Extensive evidence demonstrates functional interactions between the adrenergic and opioid systems in a diversity of tissues and organs. While some effects are due to receptor and second messenger cross-talk, recent research has revealed an extracellular, allosteric opioid binding site on adrenergic receptors that enhances adrenergic activity and its duration. The present research addresses whether opioid receptors may have an equivalent extracellular, allosteric adrenergic binding site that has similar enhancing effects on opioid binding. Comparison of adrenergic and opioid receptor sequences revealed that these receptors share very significant regions of similarity, particularly in some of the extracellular and transmembrane regions associated with adrenergic binding in the adrenergic receptors. Five of these shared regions from the mu opioid receptor (muOPR) were synthesized as peptides and tested for binding to adrenergic, opioid and control compounds using ultraviolet spectroscopy. Adrenergic compounds bound to several of these muOPR peptides with low micromolar affinity while acetylcholine, histamine and various adrenergic antagonists did not. Similar studies were then conducted with purified, intact muOPR with similar results. Combinations of epinephrine with methionine enkephalin or morphine increased the binding of both by about half a log unit. These results suggest that muOPR may be allosterically enhanced by adrenergic agonists.

A common molecular motif characterizes extracellular allosteric enhancers of GPCR aminergic receptors and suggests enhancer mechanism of action

Several classes of compounds that have no intrinsic activity on aminergic systems nonetheless enhance the potency of aminergic receptor ligands three-fold or more while significantly increasing their duration of activity, preventing tachyphylaxis and reversing fade. Enhancer compounds include ascorbic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, cortico-steroids, opioid peptides, opiates and opiate antagonists. This paper provides the first review of aminergic enhancement, demonstrating that all enhancers have a common, inobvious molecular motif and work through a common mechanism that is manifested by three common characteristics. First, aminergic enhancers bind directly to the amines they enhance, suggesting that the common structural motif is reflected in common binding targets. Second, one common target is the first extracellular loop of aminergic receptors. Third, at least some enhancers are antiphosphodiesterases. These observations suggest that aminergic enhancers act on the extracellular surface of aminergic receptors to keep the receptor in its high affinity state, trapping the ligand inside the receptor. Enhancer binding produces allosteric modifications of the receptor structure that interfere with phosphorylation of the receptor, thereby inhibiting down-regulation of the receptor. The mechanism explains how enhancers potentiate aminergic activity and increase duration of activity and makes testable predictions about additional compounds that should act as aminergic enhancers.

Neural control of the synthesis and release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

Preovulatory surges of luteinizing hormone (LH) depend upon neurotransmitter activation of neurons that secrete LH-releasing hormone (LHRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone GnRH) and noradrenaline plays a pivotal role in this critical event. The interaction is amongst noradrenaline and other neurotransmitters such as GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid), opiates, serotonin and excitatory amino acids (N-methyl-D-aspartate, NMDA) on LHRH neuronal activity are complex. GABA and opiates suppress the presynaptic release of noradrenaline but only GABA also directly affects the responsiveness of LHRH neurons to noradrenaline. Morphine induces the release of serotonin which either directly or indirectly via other neurotransmitters (e.g. dopamine) sensitizes LHRH neurons to the stimulatory effects of noradrenaline. NMDA rapidly induces LH release but whether this drug directly affects the activity of LHRH neurons is not known. The neuronal release of LHRH is modulated by the action of oestrogen on these various neurotransmitter systems. Antioestrogens, when placed into the medial preoptic area of otherwise completely oestrogenized rats, block LH surges; LHRH mRNA levels in such animals resemble those in 9-day castrated rats. Normally, LHRH message levels increase about the time of increased noradrenaline secretion just before the LH surge. NMDA rapidly releases LH and LHRH mRNA levels are significantly raised within 15 minutes and remain so over the next 45 minutes. Thus, it seems that stimuli which evoke LHRH release also increase LHRH mRNA transcription to replenish the hormone released during the LH surge.

Delta opioid receptors are involved in morphine-induced inhibition of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in SK-N-SH cells

Opioids play an important role in the regulation of lutenizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH). In the present study, we attempted to find out the subtype of opioid receptors involved in the inhibitory effect of morphine on LHRH. Experiments were conducted on SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells that express both micro and delta opioid receptors, LHRH mRNA, and release the LHRH peptide. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to measure the levels of LHRH. LHRH level was decreased by 1000 microM of morphine regardless of the duration of exposure or differentiation status of the SK-N-SH cells and was not reversed by naloxone. Selective antagonism of micro opioid receptors, but not delta opioid receptors, allowed lower concentrations (1-100 microM) of morphine to inhibit LHRH. The results of this study imply that (1) delta opioid receptors may mediate the inhibitory effect of lower concentrations of morphine on LHRH levels in SK-N-SH cells, and (2) inhibition of LHRH level by high concentrations of morphine may involve systems other than opioid receptors.

Interactions of photoperiod, testosterone, and naloxone on GnRH and LH pulse parameters in the male sheep

This study tested the hypothesis that the effects of the opiate antagonist naloxone on GnRH (and LH) secretion is affected by photoperiod length and testosterone (T) concentrations. The effect of infusing naloxone on GnRH and LH pulse patterns was determined in four groups of orchidectomized sheep: long day (LD) photoperiod treated with T, LD without T (LDC), short day photoperiod (SD) with T, SDC (n = 5-7/group). Hypophyseal-portal and jugular blood samples were collected at 10 min intervals for 4 h before and 4 h during naloxone infusion (1 mg/kg/h). Neither photoperiod nor T affected either mean GnRH or LH whereas naloxone (P < 0.01) increased both. LD photoperiod (P < 0.01), T (P < 0.01) and naloxone (P < 0.01) all increased LH pulse amplitude whereas only naloxone increased GnRH pulse amplitude (P < 0.01). There was an interaction (P < 0.01) between steroid and naloxone on LH, but not GnRH, pulse amplitude. Both LD photoperiod and T increased both LH and GnRH (P < 0.01) interpulse-interval (IPI). Naloxone decreased GnRH IPI (P < 0.01). The LH/GnRH pulse amplitude ratio was (P < 0.02) increased by T--likely a secondary response to the T-induced increase in IPI. These results are interpreted as showing that in the ram the endogenous opiate peptides regulate both GnRH pulse frequency and amplitude, but that their specific role is modulated by photoperiod and T. These results do not support the concept that the opiate peptides are the primary mediators of the negative feedback effects of T.

Central connections of the ovine olfactory bulb formation identified using wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase

Pheromonal stimuli elicit rapid behavioral and reproductive endocrine changes in the ewe. The neural pathways responsible for these effects in sheep are unknown, in part, because the olfactory bulb projections have not been examined in this species. Using the anterograde and retrograde neuronal tracer, wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP), we describe the afferent and efferent olfactory bulb connections of the Suffolk ewe. Injections of WGA-HRP limited to the main olfactory bulb resulted in retrograde labeling of cells in numerous telencephalic, diencephalic, and metencephalic regions. Terminal labeling was limited to layer la of ipsilateral cortical structures extending rostrally from the anterior olfactory nucleus (AON), piriform cortex, anterior-, and posterolateral-cortical amygdaloid nuclei to lateral entorhinal cortex caudally. Injections involving the accessory olfactory bulb and AON produced additional labeling of cells within the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), medial nucleus of the amygdala, and a few cells in the posteromedial cortical nucleus of the amygdala. Terminal labeling included a small dorsomedial quadrant of BNST and also extended to the far lateral portions of the supraoptic nucleus. A clearly defined accessory olfactory tract and nucleus was not evident, perhaps due to limitations in the sensitivity of the method. With this possible exception, the afferent and efferent olfactory connections in the sheep appear similar to those reported for other species.

Evidence that amplification of norepinephrine-induced LH release by morphine is indirectly due to suppression of tuberoinfundibular dopamine secretion

We previously observed that morphine markedly amplifies LH secretion following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) norepinephrine (NE) infusions. Based on additional evidence, we hypothesized that perhaps these morphine effects were due to suppression of tuberoinfundibular dopamine (TIDA) secretion thus allowing NE to evoke a greater release of LHRH from axon terminals in the median eminence than would otherwise occur. In the present studies, we examined whether apomorphine (a DA receptor agonist) would suppress and haloperidol (a DA receptor antagonist) would mimic these enhancing effects of morphine on NE-induced LH secretion. Estrogen-treated ovariectomized rats were used in these studies. NE, when infused i.c.v. (45 micrograms) evoked a modest increase in plasma LH (1.1 +/- 0.2 to 2.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) within 15 min. When morphine sulfate (10 mg/kg s.c.) was given 15 min prior to NE, LH peak values of 11 +/- 2 ng/ml were obtained by 60 min. Treatment of rats with apomorphine (1.5 mg/kg s.c.) at -15 min, morphine at 0 min and i.c.v. NE at 15 min resulted in a significant blunting of morphine's effect on NE-induced LH release. Moreover, in all morphine-treated rats, plasma prolactin (PRL) increased significantly within 10 min, peaked at 30 min and declined towards basal values by 90 min. Apomorphine completely blocked this morphine effect of PRL release. Haloperidol (HAL; 2.5 mg/kg s.c.) treatment had no effect on basal LH release but resulted in a significant increase in PRL which remained elevated up to 180 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of morphine on hypothalamic tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA levels in dopaminergic neurons and on preoptic DOPAC levels measured by microdialysis

Morphine not only suppresses norepinephrine-induced increases in LHRH mRNA levels but, in these same animals, it simultaneously amplifies norepinephrine (NE)-induced LH release. These observations suggest that NE may activate parallel mechanisms which independently increase LHRH mRNA levels and LHRH release and suggest that some of these effects could be mediated indirectly via morphine's action on different components of the hypothalamic dopamine (DA) system. Accordingly, in the present studies we examined the effects of morphine on various components of this dopamine system using as our index of altered DA neuronal activity, the changes which occur in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA levels following morphine. As an ancillary index of changes which occur in dopamine neuronal activity, we measured, by microdialysis, the changes which occur in preoptic dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) levels after either subcutaneous injections or following microinfusions of morphine into the zona incerta (ZI). In a final study, we evaluated whether DA when given alone (icv infusion) or prior to icv NE would altered LH release. Single cell levels of TH mRNA in preoptic A15 and periventricular anterior hypothalamic A14 DA neurons were not affected by morphine 1, 5 and 24 h later. In contrast, within 1 h after morphine, TH mRNA levels in ZI A13 neurons were significantly elevated and they remained high at 5 nd 24 h compared to controls. Morphine also resulted in a significant rise in TH mRNA levels in tuberoinfundibular DA neurons (TIDA) (A12) within 1 h and these levels remained high to 5 h. Thereafter, by 24 h, message levels had returned to control values. Morphine also resulted in a rapid rise in plasma prolactin (Prl) with peak values occurring at 20 min and then returning to baseline by 90 min. When morphine was given sc it resulted, within 15 min, in a rapid rise in preoptic DOPAC levels and these levels continued to rise such that they were 217% higher than pretreatment values by 105 min. Preoptic 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) levels also increased by 25-75% after sc morphine. The microinfusion of morphine into ZI also resulted in elevated preoptic DOPAC but not 5-HIAA levels within 15 min. The icv infusion of DA alone had no effect on plasma LH whereas, NE (icv) produced a modest but significant increase in plasma LH. When DA was given 15 min prior to the infusion of NE, neither amplification nor inhibition of NE-induced LH release occurred. From these and other studies we conclude that the morphine-induced suppression of TIDA neuronal activity may allow NE to release greater amounts of LHRH from axon terminals in the median eminence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Morphine amplifies norepinephrine (NE)-induced LH release but blocks NE-stimulated increases in LHRH mRNA levels: comparison of responses obtained in ovariectomized, estrogen-treated normal and androgen-sterilized rats

In these studies we examined the temporal effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusions of norepinephrine (NE) on plasma LH and on LHRH mRNA levels in the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) and in neurons located in the rostral (r), middle (m) and caudal (c) preoptic areas (POA) of ovariectomized, estrogen-treated rats. Thereafter, we compared these responses to those which occur in androgen-sterilized rats (ASR). NE infusions not only increased plasma LH concentrations but within 1 h after NE, LHRH mRNA levels also were increased significantly in the OVLT and rPOA but not in the mPOA or cPOA. By 4 h, these message levels still were elevated in the OVLT and rPOA and they now also were significantly higher than control values in the mPOA and cPOA. While NE also increased LH secretion in ASR, the plasma LH concentrations obtained were markedly blunted compared to control values. Moreover, NE infusions did not alter single cell levels of LHRH mRNA in any region of the rostral hypothalamus. Previously, we have reported that morphine (s.c.) markedly amplifies NE-induced LH release and questioned whether these responses are accompanied by concomitant augmented increases in LHRH mRNA levels. Morphine alone did not affect basal LHRH mRNA or plasma LH levels. However, when rats were pretreated with morphine (-15 min) and NE was infused i.c.v. at 0 time, significant amplification of LH release occurred but, unexpectedly, morphine completely blocked NE-induced increases in LHRH mRNA levels in all of the neurons we examined. Morphine also amplified LH release in ASR but these responses were significantly less than those obtained in control rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)