A randomized placebo-controlled trial of an NMDA receptor antagonist in sleep-disordered breathing

The placebo effect in pharmacological treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

New drug treatments are under development in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The placebo effect is well recognized in various conditions, but its relevance in OSA is debated. In the current study we determined the influence of a placebo effect in studies of drug therapy in OSA.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021229410) with searches in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to 2021-01-19. Inclusion criteria were (i) RCTs of adults with OSA, (ii) drug intervention with placebo baseline and follow-up sleep study (iii) outcomes: apnea hypopnea index (AHI), mean oxygen saturation (mSaO2), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and/or Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Risk-of-bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.

RESULTS

7436 articles were identified and 29 studies included (n = 413). Studies were generally small (median n = 14), with 78% men, baseline AHI range 9-74 events/h and treatment duration range 1-120 days. Meta-analyses were conducted for main outcomes. Mean change of the primary outcome, AHI, was -0.84 (95% CI -2.98 to 1.30); mSaO2 and ODI estimations were also non-significant. ESS showed a trend towards a reduction of -1 unit. Subgroup analysis did not show significant differences. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated mostly low risk but studies were small with wide confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis we did not identify systematic placebo effects on the AHI, ODI or mSaO2 while ESS score showed a trend for a small reduction. These results have an impact on the design and interpretation of drug trials in OSA.

Respiratory neuroplasticity: Mechanisms and translational implications of phrenic motor plasticity

Widespread appreciation that neuroplasticity is an essential feature of the neural system controlling breathing has emerged only in recent years. In this chapter, we focus on respiratory motor plasticity, with emphasis on the phrenic motor system. First, we define related but distinct concepts: neuromodulation and neuroplasticity. We then focus on mechanisms underlying two well-studied models of phrenic motor plasticity: (1) phrenic long-term facilitation following brief exposure to acute intermittent hypoxia; and (2) phrenic motor facilitation after prolonged or recurrent bouts of diminished respiratory neural activity. Advances in our understanding of these novel and important forms of plasticity have been rapid and have already inspired translation in multiple respects: (1) development of novel therapeutic strategies to preserve/restore breathing function in humans with severe neurological disorders, such as spinal cord injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; and (2) the discovery that similar plasticity also occurs in nonrespiratory motor systems. Indeed, the realization that similar plasticity occurs in respiratory and nonrespiratory motor neurons inspired clinical trials to restore leg/walking and hand/arm function in people living with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury. Similar application may be possible to other clinical disorders that compromise respiratory and non-respiratory movements.

Competing mechanisms of plasticity impair compensatory responses to repetitive apnoea

KEY POINTS

Intermittent reductions in respiratory neural activity, a characteristic of many ventilatory disorders, leads to inadequate ventilation and arterial hypoxia. Both intermittent reductions in respiratory neural activity and intermittent hypoxia trigger compensatory enhancements in inspiratory output when experienced separately, forms of plasticity called inactivity-induced inspiratory motor facilitation (iMF) and long-term facilitation (LTF), respectively. Reductions in respiratory neural activity that lead to moderate, but not mild, arterial hypoxia occludes plasticity expression, indicating that concurrent induction of iMF and LTF impairs plasticity through cross-talk inhibition of their respective signalling pathways. Moderate hypoxia undermines iMF by enhancing NR2B-containing NMDA receptor signalling, which can be rescued by exogenous retinoic acid, a molecule necessary for iMF. These data suggest that in ventilatory disorders characterized by reduced inspiratory motor output, such as sleep apnoea, endogenous mechanisms of compensatory plasticity may be impaired, and that exogenously activating respiratory plasticity may be a novel strategy to improve breathing.

ABSTRACT

Many forms of sleep apnoea are characterized by recurrent reductions in respiratory neural activity, which leads to inadequate ventilation and arterial hypoxia. Both recurrent reductions in respiratory neural activity and hypoxia activate mechanisms of compensatory plasticity that augment inspiratory output and lower the threshold for apnoea, inactivity-induced inspiratory motor facilitation (iMF) and long-term facilitation (LTF), respectively. However, despite frequent concurrence of reduced respiratory neural activity and hypoxia, mechanisms that induce and regulate iMF and LTF have only been studied separately. Here, we demonstrate that recurrent reductions in respiratory neural activity ('neural apnoea') accompanied by cessations in ventilation that result in moderate (but not mild) hypoxaemia do not elicit increased inspiratory output, suggesting that concurrent induction of iMF and LTF occludes plasticity. A key role for NMDA receptor activation in impairing plasticity following concurrent neural apnoea and hypoxia is indicated since recurrent hypoxic neural apnoeas triggered increased phrenic inspiratory output in rats in which spinal NR2B-containing NMDA receptors were inhibited. Spinal application of retinoic acid, a key molecule necessary for iMF, bypasses NMDA receptor-mediated constraints, thereby rescuing plasticity following hypoxic neural apnoeas. These studies raise the intriguing possibility that endogenous mechanisms of compensatory plasticity may be impaired in some individuals with sleep apnoea, and that exogenously activating pathways giving rise to respiratory plasticity may be a novel pharmacological strategy to improve breathing.

Impact of concomitant medications on obstructive sleep apnoea

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is characterized by repeated episodes of apnoea and hypopnoea during sleep. Little is known about the potential impact of therapy drugs on the underlying respiratory disorder. Any influence should be taken into account and appropriate action taken, including drug withdrawal if necessary. Here, we review drugs in terms of their possible impact on OSA; drugs which (1) may worsen OSA; (2) are unlikely to have an impact on OSA; (3) those for which data are scarce or contradictory; and (4) drugs with a potentially improving effect. The level of evidence is ranked according to three grades: A - randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high statistical power; B - RCTs with lower power, non-randomized comparative studies and observational studies; C - retrospective studies and case reports. Our review enabled us to propose clinical recommendations. Briefly, agents worsening OSA or inducing weight gain, that must be avoided, are clearly identified. Drugs such as 'Z drugs' and sodium oxybate should be used with caution as the literature contains conflicting results. Finally, larger trials are needed to clarify the potential positive impact of certain drugs on OSA. In the meantime, some, such as diuretics or other antihypertensive medications, are helpful in reducing OSA-associated cardiovascular morbidity.

The incidence of unpleasant dreams after sub-anaesthetic ketamine

RATIONALE

Ketamine is an N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with psychotogenic effects and for which there are diverse reports of whether pleasant or unpleasant dreams result during anaesthesia, post-operatively or after sub-anaesthetic use.

OBJECTIVE

To assess in healthy volunteers the incidence of unpleasant dreams over the three nights after receiving a sub-anaesthetic dose of ketamine, in comparison to placebo, and with retrospective home nightmare frequency as a covariate.

METHOD

Thirty healthy volunteers completed questionnaires about retrospective home dream recall and were then given either ketamine (n = 19, males = 9, mean age = 23.5 years; mean ketamine blood plasma = 175.29 ng/mL) or placebo (n = 11, males = 5, mean age = 25.4 years). Dream recall and pleasantness/unpleasantness of dream content were recorded by questionnaire at home for the three nights after infusion.

RESULTS

Ketamine resulted in significantly more mean dream unpleasantness relative to placebo and caused a threefold increase in the odds ratio for the incidence of an unpleasant dream. The number of dreams reported over the three nights did not differ between the groups. The incidence of unpleasant dreams after ketamine use was predicted by retrospectively assessed nightmare frequency at home.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine causes unpleasant dreams over the three post-administration nights. This may be evidence of a residual psychotogenic effect that is not found on standard self-report symptomatology measures or a result of disturbed sleep electrophysiology.

Pharmacological management of sleep apnoea

Obstructive sleep apnoea poses a significant health hazard that is associated with leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is the primary treatment modality, with surgical treatments as alternatives. Oral appliances and pharmacological therapy remain adjunctive modalities. Non-specific treatments include weight loss, postural therapy and behavioural measures. Pharmacotherapy goals include the reduction of risk factors for sleep apnoea; correction of underlying predisposing metabolic diseases, such as hypothyroidism or acromegaly; treatment of associated symptoms, including excessive daytime sleepiness; and prevention of apnoeas/hypopnoeas. This paper reviews data supporting the treatment of sleep apnoea with various pharmacological agents, including intranasal corticosteroids, decongestant sprays, nicotine therapy, opiate antagonists, methylxanthine derivatives, oestrogen and progesterone, testosterone, thyroid hormone, growth hormone therapy for acromegaly, beta-blockers, alpha-adrenergic agonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, glutamate antagonists, acetazolamide, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, physostigmine, modafinil and TNF-alpha antagonists, in addition to supplemental oxygen, and carbon dioxide inhalation. Some of these drugs have received very little testing and are the subject of few research articles.