The pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone in the thoroughbred racehorse

Modelling of oscillatory cortisol response in horses using a Bayesian population approach for evaluation of dexamethasone suppression test protocols

Cortisol is a steroid hormone relevant to immune function in horses and other species and shows a circadian rhythm. The glucocorticoid dexamethasone suppresses cortisol in horses. Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) is a disease in which the cortisol suppression mechanism through dexamethasone is challenged. Overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) protocols are used to test the functioning of this mechanism and to establish a diagnosis for PPID. However, existing DST protocols have been recognized to perform poorly in previous experimental studies, often indicating presence of PPID in healthy horses. This study uses a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling approach to analyse the oscillatory cortisol response and its interaction with dexamethasone. Two existing DST protocols were then scrutinized using model simulations with particular focus on their ability to avoid false positive outcomes. Using a Bayesian population approach allowed for quantification of uncertainty and enabled predictions for a broader population of horses than the underlying sample. Dose selection and sampling time point were both determined to have large influence on the number of false positives. Advice on pitfalls in test protocols and directions for possible improvement of DST protocols were given. The presented methodology is also easily extended to other clinical test protocols.

Efficacy of inhaled budesonide for the treatment of severe equine asthma

Background

Corticosteroids are the most potent drugs for the control of severe equine asthma, but adverse effects limit their chronic systemic administration. Inhaled medications allow for drug delivery directly into the airways, reducing the harmful effects of these drugs.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of inhaled budesonide specifically formulated for the equine use and administered by a novel inhalation device in horses with severe asthma.

Study design

Experimental studies in horses with naturally occurring asthma with cross‐over, randomised, blinded experimental designs.

Methods

In Study 1, budesonide (1800 μg twice daily) administered using a novel Respimat^® based inhaler was compared to i.v. dexamethasone (0.04 mg/kg). In Study 2, 3 doses of budesonide (450, 900, and 1800 μg) were compared to oral dexamethasone (0.066 mg/kg). Lung function, bronchoalveolar fluid cytology (Study 1), CBC, serum chemistry, and serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) values were evaluated.

Results

In Study 1, there was a marked and significant improvement in the lung function of all horses treated with budesonide and dexamethasone. Neutrophil percentages in bronchoalveolar fluid decreased in all horses treated with dexamethasone and in four of six horses treated with budesonide. Serum cortisol and blood ACTH concentrations decreased with both treatments. In Study 2, there was a significant improvement in the lung function with all dosages of budesonide, and the effects of higher dosages were comparable to those of dexamethasone. Dexamethasone and budesonide at the two higher dosages induced a significant decrease of cortisol concentrations.

Main limitations

The Respimat^® based inhaler is not currently commercially available.

Conclusions

Administration of budesonide with the Respimat^® based inhaler provided dose‐dependent relief of airway obstruction in horses with severe asthma, but also a suppression of serum cortisol.

Bioavailability and tolerability of nebulised dexamethasone sodium phosphate in adult horses

BACKGROUND

Nebulisation of the injectable dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP) would offer an inexpensive way of delivering a potent corticosteroid directly to the lungs of horses with asthma. However, this approach would be advantageous only if systemic absorption is minimal and if the preservatives present in the formulation do not induce airway inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the bioavailability of nebulised DSP and determine whether it induces airway inflammation or hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression in healthy adult horses.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised crossover experiment.

METHODS

Dexamethasone sodium phosphate was administered to six healthy adult horses at a dose of 5 mg q. 24 h for 5 days via nebulised, or intravenous (i.v.) routes. Plasma dexamethasone concentrations were measured by UPLC/MS-MS to calculate bioavailability. Cytological examination of bronchoalveolar fluid was performed at baseline and after the last dose of DSP. A validated chemiluminescent immunoassay was used to measure basal serum cortisol concentrations.

RESULTS

After nebulisation to adult horses, dexamethasone had a mean (±s.d.) maximum plasma concentration of 0.774 ± 0.215 ng/mL and systemic bioavailability of 4.3 ± 1.2%. Regardless of route of administration, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid over time. During i.v. administration, basal serum cortisol concentration decreased significantly from baseline to Day 3 and remained low on Day 5. In contrast, basal serum cortisol concentration did not change significantly during administration via nebulisation.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and short period of drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone sodium phosphate administered via nebulisation had minimal systemic bioavailability and did not induce lower airway inflammation or HPA axis suppression in healthy horses.

Corticosteroids and Immune Suppressive Therapies in Horses

Immune suppressive therapies target exaggerated and deleterious responses of the immune system. Triggered by exogenous or endogenous factors, these improper responses can lead to immune or inflammatory manifestations, such as urticaria, equine asthma, or autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases. Glucocorticoids are the most commonly used immune suppressive drugs and the only ones supported by robust evidence of clinical efficacy in equine medicine. In some conditions, combining glucocorticoids with other pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, such as azathioprine, antihistamine, bronchodilators, environmental management, or desensitization, can help to decrease dosages and associated side effects.

A quantitative approach to analysing cortisol response in the horse

The cortisol response to glucocorticoid intervention has, in spite of several studies in horses, not been fully characterized with regard to the determinants of onset, intensity and duration of response. Therefore, dexamethasone and cortisol response data were collected in a study applying a constant rate infusion regimen of dexamethasone (0.17, 1.7 and 17 μg/kg) to six Standardbreds. Plasma was analysed for dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations using UHPLC-MS/MS. Dexamethasone displayed linear kinetics within the concentration range studied. A turnover model of oscillatory behaviour accurately mimicked cortisol data. The mean baseline concentration range was 34-57 μg/L, the fractional turnover rate 0.47-1.5 1/h, the amplitude parameter 6.8-24 μg/L, the maximum inhibitory capacity 0.77-0.97, the drug potency 6-65 ng/L and the sigmoidicity factor 0.7-30. This analysis provided a better understanding of the time course of the cortisol response in horses. This includes baseline variability within and between horses and determinants of the equilibrium concentration-response relationship. The analysis also challenged a protocol for a dexamethasone suppression test design and indicated future improvement to increase the predictability of the test.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexamethasone after oral administration in apparently healthy horses

OBJECTIVE

To assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of dexamethasone administered PO as a solution or powder, compared with properties of dexamethasone solution administered IV, in apparently healthy horses.

ANIMALS

6 adult horses.

PROCEDURES

Serum cortisol concentration for each horse was determined before each treatment (baseline values). Dexamethasone (0.05 mg/kg) was administered PO (in solution or powdered form) or IV (solution) to horses from which feed had or had not been withheld (unfed and fed horses, respectively). Each horse received all 6 treatments in random order at 2-week intervals; PO and IV administrations of dexamethasone were accompanied by IV or PO sham treatments, respectively. Plasma dexamethasone and serum cortisol concentrations were assessed at predetermined intervals.

RESULTS

Maximum plasma dexamethasone concentration after PO administration of powdered dexamethasone in unfed horses was significantly higher than the maximum plasma concentration after PO administration of dexamethasone solution in unfed or fed horses. Mean bioavailability of dexamethasone ranged from 28% to 66% but was not significantly different among horses receiving either formulation PO in the unfed or fed state. After dexamethasone treatment PO or IV, serum cortisol concentrations were significantly less than baseline at 1 to 72 hours in unfed horses and at 2 to 48 hours in fed horses.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PO or IV administration of dexamethasone resulted in suppression of cortisol secretion in unfed and fed adult horses; the magnitude of suppression did not differ among treatment groups, and serum cortisol concentrations returned to baseline after 48 to 72 hours.

Efficacy of oral prednisolone and dexamethasone in horses with recurrent airway obstruction in the presence of continuous antigen exposure

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY

Orally administered prednisolone and dexamethasone are used commonly in the treatment of recurrent airway obstruction (RAO) in horses. However, the efficacy of prednisolone in improving pulmonary function during continuous antigen exposure has not been evaluated critically and there is little evidence supporting the efficacy of low-dose oral dexamethasone in the same conditions.

HYPOTHESIS

Oral prednisolone and dexamethasone improve pulmonary function in RAO under conditions of continuous antigen exposure, and dexamethasone is more effective than prednisolone at commonly used dosages.

METHODS

Using a randomised crossover design, prednisolone (2 mg/kg bwt) and dexamethasone (0.05 mg/kg bwt) were administered per os, s.i.d. for 7 days, to 7 horses during clinical exacerbation of the disease. Maximal difference in transpulmonary pressure (DeltaP(L)), lung resistance (R(L)) and elastance (E(L)) were measured before and after 3 and 7 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Prednisolone and dexamethasone improved pulmonary function significantly. However, the improvement was of greater magnitude after 3 and 7 days of treatment with dexamethasone compared to prednisolone. Also, after 7 days of treatment with dexamethasone, DeltaP(L) and R(L) were not different from values obtained when horses were on pasture, while all 3 pulmonary function parameters remained different from pasture values after prednisolone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both corticosteroids improve pulmonary function, in spite of continuous antigen exposure. However, oral dexamethasone at 0.05 mg/kg bwt is more effective than prednisolone at 2 mg/kg bwt in the treatment of RAO.

POTENTIAL RELEVANCE

Prednisolone was shown, for the first time, to our knowledge, to improve the pulmonary function of horses with RAO in the presence of continuous antigen exposure. This study also demonstrates the efficacy of low-dose oral dexamethasone in reversing airway obstruction in these conditions.

Pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the effect of dexamethasone on endogenous hydrocortisone and cortisone in the horse

A compartmental model was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone (DXM) and changes in the plasma concentration of endogenous cortisone (COR) and hydrocortisone (HYD) following intravenous (i.v.) administration of DXM (0.05 mg/kg) in horses. Quantification of DXM, COR and HYD in equine plasma was achieved using liquid chromatography interfaced with triple spray quadrupole quantum tandem mass spectrometry (LC/TSQ-MS/MS). The median alpha (t(1/2alpha)), beta (t(1/2beta)), and gamma (t(1/2gamma)) half-lives were 0.33, 2.2, and 10.7 h respectively. The area under the DXM plasma concentration curve (AUC) was 113.5 ng.h/mL. At 72 h post-DXM administration, the plasma concentration of DXM in all horses was below the level of quantification (100 pg/mL). The baseline plasma concentration of COR was 3.5 +/- 0.69 ng/mL and declined significantly (P < 0.02) to 2.9 +/- 0.86 ng/mL at 1 h. The nadir in COR plasma concentration was 0.65 +/- 0.12 ng/mL at 28.8 +/- 9.0 h, and the DXM plasma concentration was 0.19 +/- 0.13 ng/mL. COR concentration returned to baseline at 96 h. Baseline plasma concentration of HYD was 58.8 +/- 11.7 ng/mL and declined significantly (P < 0.001) to 41.1 +/- 14.9 ng/mL at 1 h following DXM administration but recovered to baseline at 96 h. The sensitivity of LC/TSQ-MS/MS allowed complete description of the pharmacokinetics of DXM and its effect on plasma concentrations of both COR and HYD.

Plasma terminal half-life

Terminal plasma half-life is the time required to divide the plasma concentration by two after reaching pseudo-equilibrium, and not the time required to eliminate half the administered dose. When the process of absorption is not a limiting factor, half-life is a hybrid parameter controlled by plasma clearance and extent of distribution. In contrast, when the process of absorption is a limiting factor, the terminal half-life reflects rate and extent of absorption and not the elimination process (flip-flop pharmacokinetics). The terminal half-life is especially relevant to multiple dosing regimens, because it controls the degree of drug accumulation, concentration fluctuations and the time taken to reach equilibrium.

Efficacy of oral and intravenous dexamethasone in horses with recurrent airway obstruction

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY

Although the efficacy of dexamethasone for the treatment of recurrent airway obstruction (RAO) has been documented, the speed of onset of effect and duration of action are unknown, as is the efficacy of orally administered dexamethasone with or without fasting.

OBJECTIVES

To document the time of onset of effect and duration of action of a dexamethasone solution i.v. or orally with and without fasting.

METHODS

Protocol 1 used 8 RAO-affected horses with airway obstruction in a crossover design experiment that compared the effect of i.v. saline and dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg bwt) on pulmonary function over 4 h. Protocol 2 used 6 similar horses to compare, in a crossover design, the effects of dexamethasone i.v. (0.1 mg/kg bwt), dexamethasone per os (0.164 mg/kg bwt) with and without prior fasting, and dexamethasone per os (0.082 mg/kg) with fasting.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone i.v. caused significant improvement in lung function within 2 h with a peak effect at 4-6 h. Dexamethasone per os was effective within 6 h with peak effect at 24 h at a dose of 0.164 mg/kg bwt prior to feeding. The duration of effect was, for all dexamethasone treatments, statistically significant for 30 h when compared to saline and tended to have a longer duration of effect when used orally. Dexamethasone per os at a dose of 0.164 mg/kg bwt to fed horses had mean effects comparable to dexamethasone at a dose of 0.082 mg/kg bwt per os given to fasted horses, indicating that feeding decreases bioavailability.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone administered i.v. has a rapid onset of action in RAO-affected horses. Oral administration of a bioequivalent dose of the same solution to fasted horses is as effective as i.v. administration and tends to have longer duration of action. Fasting horses before oral administration of dexamethasone improves the efficacy of treatment.

POTENTIAL RELEVANCE

Oral administration to fasted horses of a dexamethasone solution intended for i.v. use provides an effective treatment for RAO-affected animals.

Lack of gender effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexamethasone in the camel after intravenous administration

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexamethasone were studied in six male and six female camels after a single intravenous dose (0.05 mgkg(-1) body weight) of dexamethasone. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the two-compartment pharmacokinetic model for female and male camels, respectively (mean+/-SEM) were as follows: terminal elimination half-lives were 8.02+/-1.15 and 7.33+/-0.80 h, total body clearances were 95.5+/-16.0 and 124.5+/-11.9 ml h(-1) per kg, volumes of distribution at steady state were 0.72+/-0.08 and 0.87+/-0.14 litre kg(-1), and the volumes of the central compartment were 0.12+/-0.02 and 0.17+/-0.02 litre kg(-1). There was no significant difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter between female and male camels. Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated by measuring endogenous plasma cortisol, circulating lymphocytes and neutrophils numbers and were analysed using indirect pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. The estimated IC50 of dexamethasone for cortisol and lymphocytes for female and male camels were 3.74+/-0.99 and 2.28+/-1.09 and 2.63+/-0.71 and 2.41+/-0.79 ng ml(-1), respectively. The EC50 for neutrophils for female and male camels were 24.5+/-5.83 and 20.2+/-3.82 ng ml(-1), respectively. There was no significant difference in any pharmacodynamic parameter between female and male camels. Dexamethasone in urine could be detected for 4-5 days by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and for 3-4 days by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry after an intravenous dose of 0.05 mg kg(-1) body weight.