Comparison of peginterferon pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles

Comparable HIV suppression by pegylated-IFN-α2a or pegylated-IFN-α2b during a 4-week analytical treatment interruption

We report on the post-hoc analysis of three clinical studies (NCT01935089, NCT00594880 and NCT00051818) with chronically HIV-infected, immune-reconstituted individuals with similar entry criteria, and demographics interrupting antiretroviral therapy (ART) without or with 5 weeks of weekly pegylated (Peg)-IFN-α2b or Peg-IFN-α2a immunotherapy added onto ART. Results show similar rates of viral suppression between both immunotherapies when continued during a 4-week ART interruption, despite Peg-IFN-α2a maintaining significantly higher trough blood levels.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated interferon for the treatment of hepatitis B

Introduction: Interferon (IFN) had both antiviral and immunomodulatory effects, and was one of the approved treatments for hepatitis B virus (HBV). Herein, we reviewed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated IFN-α (PegIFN-α) for the treatment of HBV. Areas covered: The steady-state serum levels of PegIFN-α were reached within 5 to 8 weeks, and the week 48 mean trough concentrations were approximately 2-fold higher than week 1. There was also no difference of the pharmacokinetics in male or female, healthy volunteers or patients with hepatitis B or C infection. PegIFN-α did not affect the metabolism of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, except inhibition of CYP1A2. There was also no pharmacokinetic interaction between PegIFN-α and HBV nucleot(s)ide analogues (NUCs). Forty-eight weeks of PegIFN-α achieved 32% of HBeAg seroconversion, 32-43% of HBV DNA suppression, 41-59% of ALT normalization, and 3% of HBsAg seroconversion rate with a post-treatment durable response up to 80% in the initial responders. Expert opinion: On-treatment HBsAg titer guided the treatment of HBV with PegIFN-α. The recommendation of PegIFN-α and NUC combination or switch remained controversial. New immunotherapeutic agents are now in development. Although, PegIFN-α should continue to play a role in the treatment of HBV.

Pharmacokinetics comparison of two pegylated interferon alfa formulations in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Several countries have used pegylation technology to improve the pharmacokinetic properties of essential drugs. Recently, a novel interferon alfa-2b protein conjugated to four-branched 12 kDa polyethylene glycol molecules was developed jointly between Cuba and Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of BIP48 (pegylated interferon alfa-2b from Bio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz, Brazil) to those of PEGASYS® (commercially available pegylated interferon alfa-2a from Roche Pharmaceutical).

METHODS

This phase I, single-centre, randomized, double-blind crossover trial enrolled 31 healthy male volunteers aged 19 to 35 who were allocated to two stages, either side of a 5-week wash-out period, with each arm lasting 14 consecutive days after subcutaneous administration of 180 μg of one formulation or the other (study or comparator). The main outcome variable was serum pegylated interferon concentrations in 15 samples collected during the course of the study and tested using an enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

There were no differences between formulations in terms of magnitude or absorption parameters. Analysis of time parameters revealed that BIP48 remained in the body significantly longer than PEGASYS® (Tmax: 73 vs. 54 h [p = 0.0010]; MRT: 133 vs. 115 h [p = 0.0324]; ke: 0.011 vs. 0.013 h(-1) [p = 0.0153]; t1/2: 192 vs. 108 h [p = 0.0218]).

CONCLUSION

BIP48 showed the expected pharmacokinetic profile for a pegylated product with a branched molecular structure. Compared to PEGASYS®, the magnitude absorption was similar, but time parameters were consistent with slower elimination. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the clinical implications of these findings. A phase II-III repeated-dose clinical trial is ongoing to study these findings in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov platform (accession number NCT01889849 ). This trial was retrospectively registered in June 2013.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of a novel pegylated recombinant consensus interferon-α variant with peginterferon-α-2a in healthy subjects

AIMS

The aims of the study were to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a novel, pegylated recombinant human consensus interferon-α variant (PEG-IFN-SA) in healthy volunteers. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of PEG-IFN-SA and peginterferon-α-2a in healthy subjects was evaluated.

METHODS

A randomized, dose-escalating, single administration dose phase I clinical study was conducted. Thirty healthy subjects received PEG-IFN-SA as a single dose of 0.5-2.0 μg kg(-1) by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection in four parallel groups. Eight subjects received peginterferon-α-2a as a single dose of 180 μg s.c.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of adverse events for PEG-IFN-SA and peginterferon-α-2a were 29 of 30 and 7 of 8, respectively. The adverse events for PEG-IFN-SA were mild to moderate and similar to those of peginterferon-α-2a. Within 168 h after injection, the mean values of maximal concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing to 168 h [AUC(0-168h) ] for 2',5'-oligoadenylate, neopterin and β2 -microglobulin for PEG-IFN-SA at 1.5 μg kg(-1 ) s.c. were similar to or higher than those for peginterferon-α-2a at a dose of 180 μg s.c. After s.c. injection of PEG-IFN-SA at 1.5 μg kg(-1) , the mean geometric mean values of plasma half-life, time to maximal concentration, maximal concentration and AUC(0-168h) were 55.3 h, 26.9 h, 0.53 μg l(-1) and 44.0 μg l(-1)  h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The tolerance, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of PEG-IFN-SA support its administration by s.c. injection as a single dose of 1.5 μg kg(-1) or at 2.0 μg kg(-1) per week.

Therapeutic options for patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia refractory/resistant to hydroxyurea

Hydroxyurea (HU) has traditionally been the first-line treatment for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) at high risk for vascular complications. However, approximately 20-25% of patients develop resistance or intolerance to HU and must be treated with second-line therapies. Resistance is associated with disease transformation and reduced survival. However, given the dearth of large-scale controlled clinical trials in this patient population, there is no clear consensus on how to best treat patients who develop resistance or intolerance to HU. Herein, we review current literature on treatment options for patients with HU-refractory/resistant PV or ET and provide recommendations for treating these patients.