Translocation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase against a protein roadblock in vivo highlights a passive sliding mechanism for transcript elongation

Transcriptional Pausing as a Mediator of Bacterial Gene Regulation

Cellular life depends on transcription of DNA by RNA polymerase to express genetic information. RNA polymerase has evolved not just to read information from DNA and write it to RNA but also to sense and process information from the cellular and extracellular environments. Much of this information processing occurs during transcript elongation, when transcriptional pausing enables regulatory decisions. Transcriptional pauses halt RNA polymerase in response to DNA and RNA sequences and structures at locations and times that help coordinate interactions with small molecules and transcription factors important for regulation. Four classes of transcriptional pause signals are now evident after decades of study: elemental pauses, backtrack pauses, hairpin-stabilized pauses, and regulator-stabilized pauses. In this review, I describe current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these four classes of pause signals, remaining questions about how RNA polymerase responds to pause signals, and the many exciting directions now open to understand pausing and the regulation of transcript elongation on a genome-wide scale. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 75 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Single-molecule insights into torsion and roadblocks in bacterial transcript elongation

During transcription, RNA polymerase (RNAP) translocates along the helical template DNA while maintaining high transcriptional fidelity. However, all genomes are dynamically twisted, writhed, and decorated by bound proteins and motor enzymes. In prokaryotes, proteins bound to DNA, specifically or not, frequently compact DNA into conformations that may silence genes by obstructing RNAP. Collision of RNAPs with these architectural proteins, may result in RNAP stalling and/or displacement of the protein roadblock. It is important to understand how rapidly transcribing RNAPs operate under different levels of supercoiling or in the presence of roadblocks. Given the broad range of asynchronous dynamics exhibited by transcriptional complexes, single-molecule assays, such as atomic force microscopy, fluorescence detection, optical and magnetic tweezers, etc. are well suited for detecting and quantifying activity with adequate spatial and temporal resolution. Here, we summarize current understanding of the effects of torsion and roadblocks on prokaryotic transcription, with a focus on single-molecule assays that provide real-time detection and readout.

CRISPR Tools To Control Gene Expression in Bacteria

CRISPR-Cas systems have been engineered as powerful tools to control gene expression in bacteria. The most common strategy relies on the use of Cas effectors modified to bind target DNA without introducing DNA breaks. These effectors can either block the RNA polymerase or recruit it through activation domains. Here, we discuss the mechanistic details of how Cas effectors can modulate gene expression by blocking transcription initiation or acting as transcription roadblocks. CRISPR-Cas tools can be further engineered to obtain fine-tuned control of gene expression or target multiple genes simultaneously. Several caveats in using these tools have also been revealed, including off-target effects and toxicity, making it important to understand the design rules of engineered CRISPR-Cas effectors in bacteria. Alternatively, some types of CRISPR-Cas systems target RNA and could be used to block gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. Finally, we review applications of these tools in high-throughput screens and the progress and challenges in introducing CRISPR knockdown to other species, including nonmodel bacteria with industrial or clinical relevance. A deep understanding of how CRISPR-Cas systems can be harnessed to control gene expression in bacteria and build powerful tools will certainly open novel research directions.

Transcription of Bacterial Chromatin

Decades of research have probed the interplay between chromatin (genomic DNA associated with proteins and RNAs) and transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) in all domains of life. In bacteria, chromatin is compacted into a membrane-free region known as the nucleoid that changes shape and composition depending on the bacterial state. Transcription plays a key role in both shaping the nucleoid and organizing it into domains. At the same time, chromatin impacts transcription by at least five distinct mechanisms: (i) occlusion of RNAP binding; (ii) roadblocking RNAP progression; (iii) constraining DNA topology; (iv) RNA-mediated interactions; and (v) macromolecular demixing and heterogeneity, which may generate phase-separated condensates. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and, in combination, mediate gene regulation. Here, we review the current understanding of these mechanisms with a focus on gene silencing by H-NS, transcription coordination by HU, and potential phase separation by Dps. The myriad questions about transcription of bacterial chromatin are increasingly answerable due to methodological advances, enabling a needed paradigm shift in the field of bacterial transcription to focus on regulation of genes in their native state. We can anticipate answers that will define how bacterial chromatin helps coordinate and dynamically regulate gene expression in changing environments.

Transcription elongation. Heterogeneous tracking of RNA polymerase and its biological implications

Regulation of transcription elongation via pausing of RNA polymerase has multiple physiological roles. The pausing mechanism depends on the sequence heterogeneity of the DNA being transcribed, as well as on certain interactions of polymerase with specific DNA sequences. In order to describe the mechanism of regulation, we introduce the concept of heterogeneity into the previously proposed alternative models of elongation, power stroke and Brownian ratchet. We also discuss molecular origins and physiological significances of the heterogeneity.

Road rules for traffic on DNA-systematic analysis of transcriptional roadblocking in vivo

Genomic DNA is bound by many proteins that could potentially impede elongation of RNA polymerase (RNAP), but the factors determining the magnitude of transcriptional roadblocking in vivo are poorly understood. Through systematic experiments and modeling, we analyse how roadblocking by the lac repressor (LacI) in Escherichia coli cells is controlled by promoter firing rate, the concentration and affinity of the roadblocker protein, the transcription-coupled repair protein Mfd, and promoter–roadblock spacing. Increased readthrough of the roadblock at higher RNAP fluxes requires active dislodgement of LacI by multiple RNAPs. However, this RNAP cooperation effect occurs only for strong promoters because roadblock-paused RNAP is quickly terminated by Mfd. The results are most consistent with a single RNAP also sometimes dislodging LacI, though we cannot exclude the possibility that a single RNAP reads through by waiting for spontaneous LacI dissociation. Reducing the occupancy of the roadblock site by increasing the LacI off-rate (weakening the operator) increased dislodgement strongly, giving a stronger effect on readthrough than decreasing the LacI on-rate (decreasing LacI concentration). Thus, protein binding kinetics can be tuned to maintain site occupation while reducing detrimental roadblocking.

Evidence for involvement of UvrB in elicitation of 'SIR' phenotype by rpoB87-gyrA87 mutations in lexA3 mutant of Escherichia coli

An unconventional DNA repair termed SIR (SOS Independent Repair), specific to mitomycin C (MMC) damage elicited by a combination of specific Rif(R) (rpoB87) and Nal(R) (gyrA87) mutations in SOS un-inducible strains of Escherichia coli was reported by Kumaresan and Jayaraman (1988). We report here that the rpoB87 mutation defines a C(1565)→T(1565) transition changing S(522)→F(522) and gyrA87 defines a G(244)→A(244) transition changing D(82)→N(82). The reconstructed lexA3 rpoB87 gyrA87 strain (DM49RN) exhibited resistance to MMC but not to UV as expected. When mutations in several genes implicated in SOS/NER were introduced into DM49RN strain, uvrB mutation alone decreased the MMC resistance and suppressed SIR phenotype. This was alleviated about two fold by a plasmid clone bearing the uvrB(+) allele. Neither SulA activity as measured based on filamentation and sulA::gfp fluorescence analyses nor the transcript levels of sulA as seen based on RT-PCR analyses indicate a change in sulA expression in DM49RN strain. However, uvrB transcript levels are increased with or without MMC treatment in the same strain. While the presence of lexA3 allele in a plasmid clone was found to markedly decrease the MMC resistance of the DM49RN strain, the additional presence of uvrB(+) allele in the same clone alleviated the suppression of MMC resistance by lexA3 allele to a considerable extent. These results indicate the increased expression of uvrB in the DM49RN strain is probably from the LexA dependent promoter of uvrB. The sequence analyses of various uvrB mutants including those isolated in this study using localized mutagenesis indicate the involvement of the nucleotide phosphate binding domain (ATPase domain) and the ATP binding domain and/or the DNA binding domain of the UvrB protein in the MMC repair in DM49RN. The possible involvement of UvrB protein in the MMC damage repair in DM49RN strain in relation to DNA repair is discussed.

Control and signal processing by transcriptional interference

A transcriptional activator can suppress gene expression by interfering with transcription initiated by another activator. Transcriptional interference has been increasingly recognized as a regulatory mechanism of gene expression. The signals received by the two antagonistically acting activators are combined by the polymerase trafficking along the DNA. We have designed a dual-control genetic system in yeast to explore this antagonism systematically. Antagonism by an upstream activator bears the hallmarks of competitive inhibition, whereas a downstream activator inhibits gene expression non-competitively. When gene expression is induced weakly, the antagonistic activator can have a positive effect and can even trigger paradoxical activation. Equilibrium and non-equilibrium models of transcription shed light on the mechanism by which interference converts signals, and reveals that self-antagonism of activators imitates the behavior of feed-forward loops. Indeed, a synthetic circuit generates a bell-shaped response, so that the induction of expression is limited to a narrow range of the input signal. The identification of conserved regulatory principles of interference will help to predict the transcriptional response of genes in their genomic context.

Rapid kinetic analysis of transcription elongation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Nucleotide incorporation during transcription by RNA polymerase is accompanied by pyrophosphate formation. Rapid release of pyrophosphate from the elongation complex at a rate consistent with productive transcription elongation occurs only in the presence of the correct next nucleotide for incorporation into the transcript.

Mechanism of CcpA-mediated glucose repression of the resABCDE operon of Bacillus subtilis

The resABCDE operon of Bacillus subtilis encodes a three-protein complex involved in cytochrome c biogenesis as well as the ResE sensor kinase and the ResD response regulator that control electron transfer and other functions in response to oxygen availability. We have investigated the mechanism of CcpA-mediated control of res operon expression which occurs maximally in the stationary phase of growth. Two CcpA-binding (CRE) sites were found in the res operon, one (CRE1) in the control region in front of the resA promoter, the other (CRE2) in the resB structural gene. Both CRE sites proved to be essential for full CcpA-mediated glucose repression of res operon expression. We propose that both looping and road block mechanisms are involved in res operon control by CcpA.

Translocation by T7 RNA polymerase: a sensitively poised Brownian ratchet

Studies of halted T7 RNA polymerase (T7RNAP) elongation complexes (ECs) or of T7RNAP transcription against roadblocks due to DNA-bound proteins indicate that T7RNAP translocates via a passive Brownian ratchet mechanism. Crystal structures of T7RNAP ECs suggest that translocation involves an active power-stroke. However, neither solution studies of halted or slowed T7RNAP ECs, nor crystal structures of static complexes, are necessarily relevant to how T7RNAP translocates during rapid elongation. A recent single molecule study of actively elongating T7RNAPs provides support for the Brownian ratchet mechanism. Here, we obtain additional evidence for the existence of a Brownian ratchet during active T7RNAP elongation by showing that both rapidly elongating and halted complexes are equally sensitive to pyrophosphate. Using chemical nucleases tethered to the polymerase we achieve sub-ångström resolution in measuring the average position of halted T7RNAP ECs and find that the positional equilibrium of the EC is sensitively poised between pre-translocated and post-translocated states. This may be important in maximizing the sensitivity of the polymerase to sequences that cause pausing or termination. We also confirm that a crystallographically observed disorder to order transition in a loop formed by residues 589-612 also occurs in solution and is coupled to pyrophosphate or NTP release. This transition allows the loop to make interactions with the DNA that help stabilize the laterally mobile, ligand-free EC against dissociation.

Regulation of sigL expression by the catabolite control protein CcpA involves a roadblock mechanism in Bacillus subtilis: potential connection between carbon and nitrogen metabolism

A catabolite-responsive element (CRE), a binding site for the CcpA transcription factor, was identified within the sigL structural gene encoding sigma(L) in Bacillus subtilis. We show that CcpA binds to this CRE to regulate sigL expression by a "roadblock" mechanism and that this mechanism in part accounts for catabolite repression of sigma(L)-directed levD operon expression.

Thinking quantitatively about transcriptional regulation

By thinking about the chemical and physical mechanisms that are involved in the stepwise elongation of RNA transcripts, we can begin to understand the way that these mechanisms are controlled within the cell to reflect the different requirements for transcription that are posed by various metabolic, developmental and disease states. Here, we focus on the mechanistic details of the single-nucleotide addition (or excision) cycle in the transcription process, as this is the level at which many regulatory mechanisms function and can be explained in quantitative terms.

A Mathematical Model for Transcriptional Interference by RNA Polymerase Traffic in Escherichia coli

Interactions between RNA polymerases (RNAP) resulting from tandem or convergent arrangements of promoters can cause transcriptional interference, often with important consequences for gene expression. However, it is not known what factors determine the magnitude of interference and which mechanisms are likely to predominate in any situation. We therefore developed a mathematical model incorporating three mechanisms of transcriptional interference in bacteria: occlusion (in which passing RNAPs block access to the promoter), collisions between elongating RNAPs, and "sitting duck" interference (in which RNAP complexes waiting to fire at the promoter are removed by passing RNAP). The predictions of the model are in good agreement with a recent quantitative in vivo study of convergent promoters in E.coli. Our analysis predicts that strong occlusion requires the interfering promoter to be very strong. Collisions can also produce strong interference but only if the interfering promoter is very strong or if the convergent promoters are far apart (>200 bp). For moderate strength interfering promoters and short inter-promoter distances, strong interference is dependent on the sitting duck mechanism. Sitting duck interference is dependent on the relative strengths of the two promoters. However, it is also dependent on the "aspect ratio" (the relative rates of RNAP binding and firing) of the sensitive promoter, allowing promoters of equal strength to have very different sensitivities to transcriptional interference. The model provides a framework for using transcriptional interference to investigate various dynamic processes on DNA in vivo.