Rsd family proteins make simultaneous interactions with regions 2 and 4 of the primary sigma factor

RpoS and the bacterial general stress response

SUMMARYThe general stress response (GSR) is a widespread strategy developed by bacteria to adapt and respond to their changing environments. The GSR is induced by one or multiple simultaneous stresses, as well as during entry into stationary phase and leads to a global response that protects cells against multiple stresses. The alternative sigma factor RpoS is the central GSR regulator in E. coli and conserved in most γ-proteobacteria. In E. coli, RpoS is induced under conditions of nutrient deprivation and other stresses, primarily via the activation of RpoS translation and inhibition of RpoS proteolysis. This review includes recent advances in our understanding of how stresses lead to RpoS induction and a summary of the recent studies attempting to define RpoS-dependent genes and pathways.

CsrA coordinates the expression of ribosome hibernation and anti-σ factor proteins

IMPORTANCE

The Csr/Rsm system (carbon storage regulator or repressor of stationary phase metabolites) is a global post-transcriptional regulatory system that coordinates and responds to environmental cues and signals, facilitating the transition between active growth and stationary phase. Another key determinant of bacterial lifestyle decisions is the management of the cellular gene expression machinery. Here, we investigate the connection between these two processes in Escherichia coli. Disrupted regulation of the transcription and translation machinery impacts many cellular functions, including gene expression, growth, fitness, and stress resistance. Elucidating the role of the Csr system in controlling the activity of RNAP and ribosomes advances our understanding of mechanisms controlling bacterial growth. A more complete understanding of these processes could lead to the improvement of therapeutic strategies for recalcitrant infections.

Folding of the nascent polypeptide chain of a histidine phosphocarrier protein in vitro

The phosphotransferase system (PTS), a metabolic pathway formed by five proteins, modulates the use of sugars in bacteria. The second protein in the chain is the histidine phosphocarrier, HPr, with the binding site at His15. The HPr kinase/phosphorylase (HPrK/P), involved in the bacterial use of carbon sources, phosphorylates HPr at Ser46, and it binds at its binding site. The regulator of sigma D protein (Rsd) also binds to HPr at His15. We have designed fragments of HPr, growing from its N-terminus and containing the His15. In this work, we obtained three fragments, HPr38, HPr58 and HPr70, comprising the first thirty-eight, fifty-eight and seventy residues of HPr, respectively. All fragments were mainly disordered, with evidence of a weak native-like, helical population around the binding site, as shown by fluorescence, far-ultraviolet circular dichroism, size exclusion chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance. Although HPr38, HPr58 and HPr70 were disordered, they could bind to: (i) the N-terminal domain of first protein of the PTS, EIN; (ii) Rsd; and, (iii) HPrK/P, as shown by fluorescence and biolayer interferometry (BLI). The association constants for each protein to any of the fragments were in the low micromolar range, within the same range than those measured in the binding of HPr to each protein. Then, although acquisition of stable, native-like secondary and tertiary structures occurred at the last residues of the polypeptide, the ability to bind protein partners happened much earlier in the growing chain. Binding was related to the presence of the native-like structure around His15.

An N-terminal half fragment of the histidine phosphocarrier protein, HPr, is disordered but binds to HPr partners and shows antibacterial properties

BACKGROUND

The phosphotransferase system (PTS) modulates the preferential use of sugars in bacteria. It is formed by a protein cascade in which the first two proteins are general (namely enzyme I, EI, and the histidine phosphocarrier protein, HPr) and the others are sugar-specific permeases; the active site of HPr is His15. The HPr kinase/phosphorylase (HPrK/P), involved in the use of carbon sources in Gram-positive, phopshorylates HPr at a serine. The regulator of sigma D protein (Rsd) also binds to HPr. We are designing specific fragments of HPr, which can be used to interfere with those protein-protein interactions (PPIs), where the intact HPr intervenes.

METHODS

We obtained a fragment (HPr48) comprising the first forty-eight residues of HPr. HPr48 was disordered as shown by fluorescence, far-ultraviolet (UV) circular dichroism (CD), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

RESULTS

Secondary structure propensities, from the assigned backbone nuclei, further support the unfolded nature of the fragment. However, HPr48 was capable of binding to: (i) the N-terminal region of EI, EIN; (ii) the intact Rsd; and, (iii) HPrK/P, as shown by fluorescence, far-UV CD, NMR and biolayer interferometry (BLI). The association constants for each protein, as measured by fluorescence and BLI, were in the order of the low micromolar range, similar to those measured between the intact HPr and each of the other macromolecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Although HPr48 is forty-eight-residue long, it assisted antibiotics to exert antimicrobial activity.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

HPr48 could be used as a lead compound in the development of new antibiotics, or, alternatively, to improve the efficiency of existing ones.

Residual Helicity at the Active Site of the Histidine Phosphocarrier, HPr, Modulates Binding Affinity to Its Natural Partners

The phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) modulates the preferential use of sugars in bacteria. The first proteins in the cascade are common to all organisms (EI and HPr). The active site of HPr involves a histidine (His15) located immediately before the beginning of the first α-helix. The regulator of sigma D (Rsd) protein also binds to HPr. The region of HPr comprising residues Gly9-Ala30 (HPr^9–30), involving the first α-helix (Ala16-Thr27) and the preceding active site loop, binds to both the N-terminal region of EI and intact Rsd. HPr^9–30 is mainly disordered. We attempted to improve the affinity of HPr^9–30 to both proteins by mutating its sequence to increase its helicity. We designed peptides that led to a marginally larger population in solution of the helical structure of HPr^9–30. Molecular simulations also suggested a modest increment in the helical population of mutants, when compared to the wild-type. The mutants, however, were bound with a less favorable affinity than the wild-type to both the N-terminal of EI (EIN) or Rsd, as tested by isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescence. Furthermore, mutants showed lower antibacterial properties against Staphylococcus aureus than the wild-type peptide. Therefore, we concluded that in HPr, a compromise between binding to its partners and residual structure at the active site must exist to carry out its function.

Chemical-genetic interrogation of RNA polymerase mutants reveals structure-function relationships and physiological tradeoffs

The multi-subunit bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) and its associated regulators carry out transcription and integrate myriad regulatory signals. Numerous studies have interrogated RNAP mechanism, and RNAP mutations drive Escherichia coli adaptation to many health- and industry-relevant environments, yet a paucity of systematic analyses hampers our understanding of the fitness trade-offs from altering RNAP function. Here, we conduct a chemical-genetic analysis of a library of RNAP mutants. We discover phenotypes for non-essential insertions, show that clustering mutant phenotypes increases their predictive power for drawing functional inferences, and demonstrate that some RNA polymerase mutants both decrease average cell length and prevent killing by cell-wall targeting antibiotics. Our findings demonstrate that RNAP chemical-genetic interactions provide a general platform for interrogating structure-function relationships in vivo and for identifying physiological trade-offs of mutations, including those relevant for disease and biotechnology. This strategy should have broad utility for illuminating the role of other important protein complexes.

Coordinated Regulation of Rsd and RMF for Simultaneous Hibernation of Transcription Apparatus and Translation Machinery in Stationary-Phase Escherichia coli

Transcription and translation in growing phase of Escherichia coli, the best-studied model prokaryote, are coupled and regulated in coordinate fashion. Accordingly, the growth rate-dependent control of the synthesis of RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme (the core component of transcription apparatus) and ribosomes (the core component of translation machinery) is tightly coordinated to keep the relative level of transcription apparatus and translation machinery constant for effective and efficient utilization of resources and energy. Upon entry into the stationary phase, transcription apparatus is modulated by replacing RNAP core-associated sigma (promoter recognition subunit) from growth-related RpoD to stationary-phase-specific RpoS. The anti-sigma factor Rsd participates for the efficient replacement of sigma, and the unused RpoD is stored silent as Rsd–RpoD complex. On the other hand, functional 70S ribosome is transformed into inactive 100S dimer by two regulators, ribosome modulation factor (RMF) and hibernation promoting factor (HPF). In this review article, we overview how we found these factors and what we know about the molecular mechanisms for silencing transcription apparatus and translation machinery by these factors. In addition, we provide our recent findings of promoter-specific transcription factor (PS-TF) screening of the transcription factors involved in regulation of the rsd and rmf genes. Results altogether indicate the coordinated regulation of Rsd and RMF for simultaneous hibernation of transcription apparatus and translation machinery.

Regulation of σ factors by conserved partner switches controlled by divergent signalling systems

Partner-Switching Systems (PSS) are widespread regulatory systems, each comprising a kinase-anti-σ, a phosphorylatable anti-σ antagonist and a phosphatase module. The anti-σ domain quickly sequesters or delivers the target σ factor according to the phosphorylation state of the anti-σ antagonist induced by environmental signals. The PSS components are proteins alone or merged to other domains probably to adapt to the input signals. PSS are involved in major cellular processes including stress response, sporulation, biofilm formation and pathogenesis. Surprisingly, the target σ factors are often unknown and the sensing modules acting upstream from the PSS diverge according to the bacterial species. Indeed, they belong to either two-component systems or complex pathways as the stressosome or Chemosensory Systems (CS). Based on a phylogenetic analysis, we propose that the sensing module in Gram-negative bacteria is often a CS.

The histidine phosphocarrier protein, HPr, binds to the highly thermostable regulator of sigma D protein, Rsd, and its isolated helical fragments

The phosphotransferase system (PTS) controls the preferential use of sugars in bacteria and it is also involved in other processes, such as chemotaxis. It is formed by a protein cascade in which the first two proteins are general (namely, EI and HPr) and the others are sugar-specific permeases. The Rsd protein binds specifically to the RNA polymerase (RNAP) σ⁷⁰ factor. We first characterized the conformational stability of Escherichia coli Rsd. And second, we delineated the binding regions of Streptomyces coelicolor, HPr^sc, and E. coli Rsd, by using fragments derived from each protein. To that end, we used several biophysical probes, namely, fluorescence, CD, NMR, ITC and BLI. Rsd had a free energy of unfolding of 15 kcal mol^-1 at 25 °C, and a thermal denaturation midpoint of 103 °C at pH 6.5. The affinity between Rsd and HPr^sc was 2 μM. Interestingly enough, the isolated helical-peptides, comprising the third (RsdH3) and fourth (RsdH4) Rsd helices, also interacted with HPr^sc in a specific manner, and with affinities similar to that of the whole Rsd. Moreover, the isolated peptide of HPr^sc, HPr^9-30, comprising the active site, His15, also was bound to intact Rsd with similar affinity. Therefore, binding between Rsd and HPr^sc was modulated by the two helices H3 and H4 of Rsd, and the regions around the active site of HPr^sc. This implies that specific fragments of Rsd and HPr^sc can be used to interfere with other protein-protein interactions (PPIs) of each other protein.

Multipart Chaperone-Effector Recognition in the Type III Secretion System of Chlamydia trachomatis

Secretion of effector proteins into the eukaryotic host cell is required for Chlamydia trachomatis virulence. In the infection process, Scc1 and Scc4, two chaperones of the type III secretion (T3S) system, facilitate secretion of the important effector and plug protein, CopN, but little is known about the details of this event. Here we use biochemistry, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and genetic analyses to characterize this trimolecular event. We find that Scc4 complexes with Scc1 and CopN in situ at the late developmental cycle of C. trachomatis. We show that Scc4 and Scc1 undergo dynamic interactions as part of the unique bacterial developmental cycle. Using alanine substitutions, we identify several amino acid residues in Scc4 that are critical for the Scc4-Scc1 interaction, which is required for forming the Scc4·Scc1·CopN ternary complex. These results, combined with our previous findings that Scc4 plays a role in transcription (Rao, X., Deighan, P., Hua, Z., Hu, X., Wang, J., Luo, M., Wang, J., Liang, Y., Zhong, G., Hochschild, A., and Shen, L. (2009) Genes Dev. 23, 1818-1829), reveal that the T3S process is linked to bacterial transcriptional events, all of which are mediated by Scc4 and its interacting proteins. A model describing how the T3S process may affect gene expression is proposed.

Bacterial Sigma Factors and Anti-Sigma Factors: Structure, Function and Distribution

Sigma factors are multi-domain subunits of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) that play critical roles in transcription initiation, including the recognition and opening of promoters as well as the initial steps in RNA synthesis. This review focuses on the structure and function of the major sigma-70 class that includes the housekeeping sigma factor (Group 1) that directs the bulk of transcription during active growth, and structurally-related alternative sigma factors (Groups 2-4) that control a wide variety of adaptive responses such as morphological development and the management of stress. A recurring theme in sigma factor control is their sequestration by anti-sigma factors that occlude their RNAP-binding determinants. Sigma factors are then released through a wide variety of mechanisms, often involving branched signal transduction pathways that allow the integration of distinct signals. Three major strategies for sigma release are discussed: regulated proteolysis, partner-switching, and direct sensing by the anti-sigma factor.

The crystal structure of the anti-σ factor CnrY in complex with the σ factor CnrH shows a new structural class of anti-σ factors targeting extracytoplasmic function σ factors

Gene expression in bacteria is regulated at the level of transcription initiation, a process driven by σ factors. The regulation of σ factor activity proceeds from the regulation of their cytoplasmic availability, which relies on specific inhibitory proteins called anti-σ factors. With anti-σ factors regulating their availability according to diverse cues, extracytoplasmic function σ factors (σ(ECF)) form a major signal transduction system in bacteria. Here, structure:function relationships have been characterized in an emerging class of minimal-size transmembrane anti-σ factors, using CnrY from Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 as a model. This study reports the 1.75-Å-resolution structure of CnrY cytosolic domain in complex with CnrH, its cognate σ(ECF), and identifies a small hydrophobic knob in CnrY as the major determinant of this interaction in vivo. Unsuspected structural similarity with the molecular switch regulating the general stress response in α-proteobacteria unravels a new class of anti-σ factors targeting σ(ECF). Members of this class carry out their function via a 30-residue stretch that displays helical propensity but no canonical structure on its own.

Key features of σS required for specific recognition by Crl, a transcription factor promoting assembly of RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Bacteria use multiple sigma factors to coordinate gene expression in response to environmental perturbations. In Escherichia coli and other γ-proteobacteria, the transcription factor Crl stimulates σ(S)-dependent transcription during times of cellular stress by promoting the association of σ(S) with core RNA polymerase. The molecular basis for specific recognition of σ(S) by Crl, rather than the homologous and more abundant primary sigma factor σ(70), is unknown. Here we use bacterial two-hybrid analysis in vivo and p-benzoyl-phenylalanine cross-linking in vitro to define the features in σ(S) responsible for specific recognition by Crl. We identify residues in σ(S) conserved domain 2 (σ(S)2) that are necessary and sufficient to allow recognition of σ(70) conserved domain 2 by Crl, one near the promoter-melting region and the other at the position where a large nonconserved region interrupts the sequence of σ(70). We then use luminescence resonance energy transfer to demonstrate directly that Crl promotes holoenzyme assembly using these specificity determinants on σ(S). Our results explain how Crl distinguishes between sigma factors that are largely homologous and activates discrete sets of promoters even though it does not bind to promoter DNA.

Evidence for sigma factor competition in the regulation of alginate production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Alginate overproduction, or mucoidy, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa lung infection in cystic fibrosis (CF). Mucoid strains with mucA mutations predominantly populate in chronically-infected patients. However, the mucoid strains can revert to nonmucoidy in vitro through suppressor mutations. We screened a mariner transposon library using CF149, a non-mucoid clinical isolate with a misssense mutation in algU (AlgU^A61V). The wild type AlgU is a stress-related sigma factor that activates transcription of alginate biosynthesis. Three mucoid mutants were identified with transposon insertions that caused 1) an overexpression of AlgU^A61V, 2) an overexpression of the stringent starvation protein A (SspA), and 3) a reduced expression of the major sigma factor RpoD (σ⁷⁰). Induction of AlgU^A61Vin trans caused conversion to mucoidy in CF149 and PAO1DalgU, suggesting that AlgU^A61V is functional in activating alginate production. Furthermore, the level of AlgU^A61V was increased in all three mutants relative to CF149. However, compared to the wild type AlgU, AlgU^A61V had a reduced activity in promoting alginate production in PAO1ΔalgU. SspA and three other anti-σ⁷⁰ orthologues, P. aeruginosa AlgQ, E. coli Rsd, and T4 phage AsiA, all induced mucoidy, suggesting that reducing activity of RpoD is linked to mucoid conversion in CF149. Conversely, RpoD overexpression resulted in suppression of mucoidy in all mucoid strains tested, indicating that sigma factor competition can regulate mucoidy. Additionally, an RpoD-dependent promoter (P_ssrA) was more active in non-mucoid strains than in isogenic mucoid variants. Altogether, our results indicate that the anti-σ⁷⁰ factors can induce conversion to mucoidy in P. aeruginosa CF149 with algU-suppressor mutation via modulation of RpoD.

The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli

Under conditions of nutrient deprivation or stress, or as cells enter stationary phase, Escherichia coli and related bacteria increase the accumulation of RpoS, a specialized sigma factor. RpoS-dependent gene expression leads to general stress resistance of cells. During rapid growth, RpoS translation is inhibited and any RpoS protein that is synthesized is rapidly degraded. The complex transition from exponential growth to stationary phase has been partially dissected by analyzing the induction of RpoS after specific stress treatments. Different stress conditions lead to induction of specific sRNAs that stimulate RpoS translation or to induction of small-protein antiadaptors that stabilize the protein. Recent progress has led to a better, but still far from complete, understanding of how stresses lead to RpoS induction and what RpoS-dependent genes help the cell deal with the stress.

The E. coli anti-sigma factor Rsd: studies on the specificity and regulation of its expression

Background

Among the seven different sigma factors in E. coli σ⁷⁰ has the highest concentration and affinity for the core RNA polymerase. The E. coli protein Rsd is regarded as an anti-sigma factor, inhibiting σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription at the onset of stationary growth. Although binding of Rsd to σ⁷⁰ has been shown and numerous structural studies on Rsd have been performed the detailed mechanism of action is still unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have performed studies to unravel the function and regulation of Rsd expression in vitro and in vivo. Cross-linking and affinity binding revealed that Rsd is able to interact with σ⁷⁰, with the core enzyme of RNA polymerase and is able to form dimers in solution. Unexpectedly, we find that Rsd does also interact with σ³⁸, the stationary phase-specific sigma factor. This interaction was further corroborated by gel retardation and footprinting studies with different promoter fragments and σ³⁸- or σ⁷⁰-containing RNA polymerase in presence of Rsd. Under competitive in vitro transcription conditions, in presence of both sigma factors, a selective inhibition of σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription was prevailing, however. Analysis of rsd expression revealed that the nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and FIS, StpA and LRP bind to the regulatory region of the rsd promoters. Furthermore, the major promoter P2 was shown to be down-regulated in vivo by RpoS, the stationary phase-specific sigma factor and the transcription factor DksA, while induction of the stringent control enhanced rsd promoter activity. Most notably, the dam-dependent methylation of a cluster of GATC sites turned out to be important for efficient rsd transcription.

Conclusions/Significance

The results contribute to a better understanding of the intricate mechanism of Rsd-mediated sigma factor specificity changes during stationary phase.

In vivo transcription dynamics of the galactose operon: a study on the promoter transition from P1 to P2 at onset of stationary phase

Quantitative analyses of the 5′ end of gal transcripts indicate that transcription from the galactose operon P1 promoter is higher during cell division. When cells are no longer dividing, however, transcription is initiated more often from the P2 promoter. Escherichia coli cells divide six times before the onset of the stationary phase when grown in LB containing 0.5% galactose at 37°C. Transcription from the two promoters increases, although at different rates, during early exponential phase (until the third cell division, OD₆₀₀ 0.4), and then reaches a plateau. The steady-state transcription from P1 continues in late exponential phase (the next three cell divisions, OD₆₀₀ 3.0), after which transcription from this promoter decreases. However, steady-state transcription from P2 continues 1 h longer into the stationary phase, before decreasing. This longer steady-state P2 transcription constitutes the promoter transition from P1 to P2 at the onset of the stationary phase. The intracellular cAMP concentration dictates P1 transcription dynamics; therefore, promoter transition may result from a lack of cAMP-CRP complex binding to the gal operon. The decay rate of gal-specific transcripts is constant through the six consecutive cell divisions that comprise the exponential growth phase, increases at the onset of the stationary phase, and is too low to be measured during the stationary phase. These data suggest that a regulatory mechanism coordinates the synthesis and decay of gal mRNAs to maintain the observed gal transcription. Our analysis indicates that the increase in P1 transcription is the result of cAMP-CRP binding to increasing numbers of galactose operons in the cell population.

Crl binds to domain 2 of σ(S) and confers a competitive advantage on a natural rpoS mutant of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi

The RpoS sigma factor (σ(S)) is the master regulator of the bacterial response to a variety of stresses. Mutants in rpoS arise in bacterial populations in the absence of stress, probably as a consequence of a subtle balance between self-preservation and nutritional competence. We characterized here one natural rpoS mutant of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Ty19). We show that the rpoS allele of Ty19 (rpoS(Ty19)) led to the synthesis of a σ(S)(Ty19) protein carrying a single glycine-to-valine substitution at position 282 in σ(S) domain 4, which was much more dependent than the wild-type σ(S) protein on activation by Crl, a chaperone-like protein that increases the affinity of σ(S) for the RNA polymerase core enzyme (E). We used the bacterial adenylate cyclase two-hybrid system to demonstrate that Crl bound to residues 72 to 167 of σ(S) domain 2 and that G282V substitution did not directly affect Crl binding. However, this substitution drastically reduced the ability of σ(S)(Ty19) to bind E in a surface plasmon resonance assay, a defect partially rescued by Crl. The modeled structure of the Eσ(S) holoenzyme suggested that substitution G282V could directly disrupt a favorable interaction between σ(S) and E. The rpoS(Ty19) allele conferred a competitive fitness when the bacterial population was wild type for crl but was outcompeted in Δcrl populations. Thus, these results indicate that the competitive advantage of the rpoS(Ty19) mutant is dependent on Crl and suggest that crl plays a role in the appearance of rpoS mutants in bacterial populations.

Essential biological processes of an emerging pathogen: DNA replication, transcription, and cell division in Acinetobacter spp

Within the last 15 years, members of the bacterial genus Acinetobacter have risen from relative obscurity to be among the most important sources of hospital-acquired infections. The driving force for this has been the remarkable ability of these organisms to acquire antibiotic resistance determinants, with some strains now showing resistance to every antibiotic in clinical use. There is an urgent need for new antibacterial compounds to combat the threat imposed by Acinetobacter spp. and other intractable bacterial pathogens. The essential processes of chromosomal DNA replication, transcription, and cell division are attractive targets for the rational design of antimicrobial drugs. The goal of this review is to examine the wealth of genome sequence and gene knockout data now available for Acinetobacter spp., highlighting those aspects of essential systems that are most suitable as drug targets. Acinetobacter spp. show several key differences from other pathogenic gammaproteobacteria, particularly in global stress response pathways. The involvement of these pathways in short- and long-term antibiotic survival suggests that Acinetobacter spp. cope with antibiotic-induced stress differently from other microorganisms.

Transcriptional switching in Escherichia coli during stress and starvation by modulation of sigma activity

During active growth of Escherichia coli, majority of the transcriptional activity is carried out by the housekeeping sigma factor (sigma(70)), whose association with core RNAP is generally favoured because of its higher intracellular level and higher affinity to core RNAP. In order to facilitate transcription by alternative sigma factors during nutrient starvation, the bacterial cell uses multiple strategies by which the transcriptional ability of sigma(70) is diminished in a reversible manner. The facilitators of shifting the balance in favour of alternative sigma factors happen to be as diverse as a small molecule (p)ppGpp (represents ppGpp or pppGpp), proteins (DksA, Rsd) and a species of RNA (6S RNA). Although 6S RNA and (p)ppGpp were known in literature for a long time, their role in transcriptional switching has been understood only in recent years. With the elucidation of function of DksA, a new dimension has been added to the phenomenon of stringent response. As the final outcome of actions of (p)ppGpp, DksA, 6S RNA and Rsd is similar, there is a need to analyse these mechanisms in a collective manner. We review the recent trends in understanding the regulation of sigma(70) by (p)ppGpp, DksA, Rsd and 6S RNA and present a case for evolving a unified model of RNAP redistribution during starvation by modulation of sigma(70) activity in E. coli.

Backbone dynamics of TFE-induced native-like fold of region 4 of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma70 subunit

Folding of a recombinant protein rECsigma(70) (4) comprising domain 4 of E. coli RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit, upon addition of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) to its aqueous solution, was monitored by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. The TFE-induced migration of resonance signals in a series of (15)N-HSQC spectra displayed sequence-dependent heterogeneity. A common trend of uniform upfield shift in both (1)H and (15)N dimensions, indicative of generation of helical structures, breaks down for some residues almost cooperatively at 10-15% TFE (v/v), pointing to the buildup of non-helical regions separating the initially induced helices. The preferences of residues to assume either helical or non-helical conformation are correlated with the location in the sequence rather than with their type. CSI descriptors and (15)N relaxation data obtained for the protein at 10% TFE allowed characterization of the stability of the pre-folded state of rECsigma(70) (4). By all the criteria applied, three highly populated alpha-helical regions separated by much more flexible residues forming a loop and a turn in the DNA-binding HLHTH motif were identified. The location of the secondary structure elements along the protein sequence coincides with those found in homologous proteins, and with the helix nucleation regions determined in unfolded rECsigma(70) (4) at low pH. The bimodal distribution of the (15)N relaxation parameters enabled identification of residues forming a framework of the folded protein strictly corresponding to the HLHTH motif, bracketed by unfolded terminal regions. Thus, in respect to rECsigma(70) (4) in aqueous solution TFE acts not only as a strong helix inducer, but also as a folding agent.

Small molecule control of virulence gene expression in Francisella tularensis

In Francisella tularensis, the SspA protein family members MglA and SspA form a complex that associates with RNA polymerase (RNAP) to positively control the expression of virulence genes critical for the intramacrophage growth and survival of the organism. Although the association of the MglA-SspA complex with RNAP is evidently central to its role in controlling gene expression, the molecular details of how MglA and SspA exert their effects are not known. Here we show that in the live vaccine strain of F. tularensis (LVS), the MglA-SspA complex works in concert with a putative DNA-binding protein we have called PigR, together with the alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), to regulate the expression of target genes. In particular, we present evidence that MglA, SspA, PigR and ppGpp regulate expression of the same set of genes, and show that mglA, sspA, pigR and ppGpp null mutants exhibit similar intramacrophage growth defects and are strongly attenuated for virulence in mice. We show further that PigR interacts directly with the MglA-SspA complex, suggesting that the central role of the MglA and SspA proteins in the control of virulence gene expression is to serve as a target for a transcription activator. Finally, we present evidence that ppGpp exerts its effects by promoting the interaction between PigR and the RNAP-associated MglA-SspA complex. Through its responsiveness to ppGpp, the contact between PigR and the MglA-SspA complex allows the integration of nutritional cues into the regulatory network governing virulence gene expression.

Guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) is a small molecule that is produced by many different bacteria in response to nutrient limitation. Although ppGpp has been shown to play an important role in controlling the expression of virulence genes in several pathogenic bacteria, few studies have addressed how this occurs. Here we show that in the intracellular pathogen F. tularensis, ppGpp plays a critical role in controlling the expression of genes required for intracellular replication and virulence, and we uncover the molecular basis for its effect. In particular, we show that ppGpp works in concert with three other essential regulators of virulence gene expression in F. tularensis—a putative DNA-binding protein that we have called PigR and the SspA protein family members MglA and SspA. Our study provides evidence that ppGpp functions to promote the interaction between PigR and a component of F. tularensis RNA polymerase (RNAP) comprising the MglA and SspA proteins. By influencing the interaction between PigR and the RNAP-associated MglA-SspA complex, ppGpp serves to tie the nutritional status of the cell to the expression of genes that are essential for survival in the host.

Direct activator/co-activator interaction is essential for bacteriophage T4 middle gene expression

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is a bifunctional regulator that inhibits transcription from the major class of bacterial promoters and also serves as an essential co-activator of transcription from T4 middle promoters. AsiA binds the primary s factor in Escherichia coli, sigma(70), and modifies the promoter recognition properties of the sigma(70)-containing RNA polymerase(RNAP) holoenzyme. In its role as co-activator, AsiA directs RNAP to T4 middle promoters in the presence of the T4-encoded activator MotA. According to the current model for T4 middle promoter activation, AsiA plays an indirect role in stabilizing the activation complex by facilitating interaction between DNA-bound MotA and sigma(70). Here we show that AsiA also plays a direct role in T4 middle promoter activation by contacting the MotA activation domain. Furthermore,we show that interaction between AsiA and the beta-flap domain of RNAP is important for co-activation. Based on our findings, we propose a revised model for T4 middle promoter activation, with AsiA organizing the activation complex via three distinct protein-protein interactions.

A global view of Escherichia coli Rsd protein and its interactions

The Escherichia coli Rsd protein forms 1 : 1 complexes with sigma(70) protein, which is the major factor in determining promoter recognition by RNA polymerase. Here we describe measurements of the levels of Rsd, RNA polymerase, sigma(70) and the alternative sigma(38) factor. Rsd levels are sufficient to sequester a significant proportion of sigma(70) and immunoaffinity pull-down experiments show that this occurs in stationary phase but not in exponentially growing cells. Rsd expression is controlled by two promoters, P1 and P2. Experiments with lac fusions show that the P2 promoter is stronger than P1, that P2 is active in all phases of growth, and that this accounts for the high levels of Rsd.

A regulator from Chlamydia trachomatis modulates the activity of RNA polymerase through direct interaction with the beta subunit and the primary sigma subunit

The obligate intracellular human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis undergoes a complex developmental program involving transition between two forms: the infectious elementary body (EB), and the rapidly dividing reticulate body (RB). However, the regulators controlling this development have not been identified. To uncover potential regulators of transcription in C. trachomatis, we screened a C. trachomatis genomic library for sequences encoding proteins that interact with RNA polymerase (RNAP). We report the identification of one such protein, CT663, which interacts with the beta and sigma subunits of RNAP. Specifically, we show that CT663 interacts with the flap domain of the beta subunit (beta-flap) and conserved region 4 of the primary sigma subunit (sigma(66) in C. trachomatis). We find that CT663 inhibits sigma(66)-dependent (but not sigma(28)-dependent) transcription in vitro, and we present evidence that CT663 exerts this effect as a component of the RNAP holoenzyme. The analysis of C. trachomatis-infected cells reveals that CT663 begins to accumulate at the commencement of the RB-to-EB transition. Our findings suggest that CT663 functions as a negative regulator of sigma(66)-dependent transcription, facilitating a global change in gene expression. The strategy used here is generally applicable in cases where genetic tools are unavailable.

6S RNA binding to Esigma(70) requires a positively charged surface of sigma(70) region 4.2

6S RNA is a small, non-coding RNA that interacts with sigma(70)-RNA polymerase and downregulates transcription at many promoters during stationary phase. When bound to sigma(70)-RNA polymerase, 6S RNA is engaged in the active site of sigma(70)-RNA polymerase in a manner similar enough to promoter DNA that the RNA can serve as a template for RNA synthesis. It has been proposed that 6S RNA mimics the conformation of DNA during transcription initiation, suggesting contacts between RNA polymerase and 6S RNA or DNA may be similar. Here we demonstrate that region 4.2 of sigma(70) is critical for the interaction between 6S RNA and RNA polymerase. We define an expanded binding surface that encompasses positively charged residues throughout the recognition helix of the helix-turn-helix motif in region 4.2, in contrast to DNA binding that is largely focused on the N-terminal region of this helix. Furthermore, negatively charged residues in region 4.2 weaken binding to 6S RNA but do not similarly affect DNA binding. We propose that the binding sites for promoter DNA and 6S RNA on region 4.2 of sigma(70) are overlapping but distinct, raising interesting possibilities for how core promoter elements contribute to defining promoters that are sensitive to 6S RNA regulation.

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein contacts the beta-flap domain of RNA polymerase

To initiate transcription from specific promoters, the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme must associate with the initiation factor sigma, which contains determinants that allow sequence-specific interactions with promoter DNA. Most bacteria contain several sigma factors, each of which directs recognition of a distinct set of promoters. A large and diverse family of proteins known as "anti-sigma factors" regulates promoter utilization by targeting specific sigma factors. The founding member of this family is the AsiA protein of bacteriophage T4. AsiA specifically targets the primary sigma factor in Escherichia coli, sigma(70), and inhibits transcription from the major class of sigma(70)-dependent promoters. AsiA-dependent transcription inhibition has been attributed to a well-documented interaction between AsiA and conserved region 4 of sigma(70). Here, we establish that efficient AsiA-dependent transcription inhibition also requires direct protein-protein contact between AsiA and the RNAP core. In particular, we demonstrate that AsiA contacts the flap domain of the RNAP beta-subunit (the beta-flap). Our findings support the emerging view that the beta-flap is a target site for regulatory proteins that affect RNAP function during all stages of the transcription cycle.