A backtrack-inducing sequence is an essential component of Escherichia coli σ(70)-dependent promoter-proximal pausing

Transcription complexes as RNA chaperones

To exert their functions, RNAs adopt diverse structures, ranging from simple secondary to complex tertiary and quaternary folds. In vivo, RNA folding starts with RNA transcription, and a wide variety of processes are coupled to co-transcriptional RNA folding events, including the regulation of fundamental transcription dynamics, gene regulation by mechanisms like attenuation, RNA processing or ribonucleoprotein particle formation. While co-transcriptional RNA folding and associated co-transcriptional processes are by now well accepted as pervasive regulatory principles in all organisms, investigations into the role of the transcription machinery in co-transcriptional folding processes have so far largely focused on effects of the order in which RNA regions are produced and of transcription kinetics. Recent structural and structure-guided functional analyses of bacterial transcription complexes increasingly point to an additional role of RNA polymerase and associated transcription factors in supporting co-transcriptional RNA folding by fostering or preventing strategic contacts to the nascent transcripts. In general, the results support the view that transcription complexes can act as RNA chaperones, a function that has been suggested over 30 years ago. Here, we discuss transcription complexes as RNA chaperones based on recent examples from bacterial transcription.

β-CASP proteins removing RNA polymerase from DNA: when a torpedo is needed to shoot a sitting duck

During the first step of gene expression, RNA polymerase (RNAP) engages DNA to transcribe RNA, forming highly stable complexes. These complexes need to be dissociated at the end of transcription units or when RNAP stalls during elongation and becomes an obstacle (‘sitting duck’) to further transcription or replication. In this review, we first outline the mechanisms involved in these processes. Then, we explore in detail the torpedo mechanism whereby a 5′–3′ RNA exonuclease (torpedo) latches itself onto the 5′ end of RNA protruding from RNAP, degrades it and upon contact with RNAP, induces dissociation of the complex. This mechanism, originally described in Eukaryotes and executed by Xrn-type 5′–3′ exonucleases, was recently found in Bacteria and Archaea, mediated by β-CASP family exonucleases. We discuss the mechanistic aspects of this process across the three kingdoms of life and conclude that 5′–3′ exoribonucleases (β-CASP and Xrn families) involved in the ancient torpedo mechanism have emerged at least twice during evolution.

Transcriptional Pausing as a Mediator of Bacterial Gene Regulation

Cellular life depends on transcription of DNA by RNA polymerase to express genetic information. RNA polymerase has evolved not just to read information from DNA and write it to RNA but also to sense and process information from the cellular and extracellular environments. Much of this information processing occurs during transcript elongation, when transcriptional pausing enables regulatory decisions. Transcriptional pauses halt RNA polymerase in response to DNA and RNA sequences and structures at locations and times that help coordinate interactions with small molecules and transcription factors important for regulation. Four classes of transcriptional pause signals are now evident after decades of study: elemental pauses, backtrack pauses, hairpin-stabilized pauses, and regulator-stabilized pauses. In this review, I describe current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these four classes of pause signals, remaining questions about how RNA polymerase responds to pause signals, and the many exciting directions now open to understand pausing and the regulation of transcript elongation on a genome-wide scale. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 75 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Nascent RNA sequencing identifies a widespread sigma70-dependent pausing regulated by Gre factors in bacteria

Promoter-proximal pausing regulates eukaryotic gene expression and serves as checkpoints to assemble elongation/splicing machinery. Little is known how broadly this type of pausing regulates transcription in bacteria. We apply nascent elongating transcript sequencing combined with RNase I footprinting for genome-wide analysis of σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription pauses in Escherichia coli. Retention of σ⁷⁰ induces strong backtracked pauses at a 10−20-bp distance from many promoters. The pauses in the 10−15-bp register of the promoter are dictated by the canonical −10 element, 6−7 nt spacer and “YR₊₁Y” motif centered at the transcription start site. The promoters for the pauses in the 16−20-bp register contain an additional −10-like sequence recognized by σ⁷⁰. Our in vitro analysis reveals that DNA scrunching is involved in these pauses relieved by Gre cleavage factors. The genes coding for transcription factors are enriched in these pauses, suggesting that σ⁷⁰ and Gre proteins regulate transcription in response to changing environmental cues.

Transcription by bacterial RNA polymerase is interrupted by pausing events that play diverse regulatory roles. Here, the authors find that a large number of E. coli sigma70-dependent pauses, clustered at a 10−20-bp distance from promoters, are regulated by Gre cleavage factors constituting a mechanism for rapid response to changing environmental cues.

Basic mechanisms and kinetics of pause-interspersed transcript elongation

RNA polymerase pausing during elongation is an important mechanism in the regulation of gene expression. Pausing along DNA templates is thought to be induced by distinct signals encoded in the nucleic acid sequence and halt elongation complexes to allow time for necessary co-transcriptional events. Pausing signals have been classified as those producing short-lived elemental, long-lived backtracked, or hairpin-stabilized pauses. In recent years, structural microbiology and single-molecule studies have significantly advanced our understanding of the paused states, but the dynamics of these states are still uncertain, although several models have been proposed to explain the experimentally observed pausing behaviors. This review summarizes present knowledge about the paused states, discusses key discrepancies among the kinetic models and their basic assumptions, and highlights the importance and challenges in constructing theoretical models that may further our biochemical understanding of transcriptional pausing.

Mechanisms of Transcriptional Pausing in Bacteria

Pausing by RNA polymerase (RNAP) during transcription regulates gene expression in all domains of life. In this review, we recap the history of transcriptional pausing discovery, summarize advances in our understanding of the underlying causes of pausing since then, and describe new insights into the pausing mechanisms and pause modulation by transcription factors gained from structural and biochemical experiments. The accumulated evidence to date suggests that upon encountering a pause signal in the nucleic-acid sequence being transcribed, RNAP rearranges into an elemental, catalytically inactive conformer unable to load NTP substrate. The conformation, and as a consequence lifetime, of an elemental paused RNAP is modulated by backtracking, nascent RNA structure, binding of transcription regulators, or a combination of these mechanisms. We conclude the review by outlining open questions and directions for future research in the field of transcriptional pausing.

Active site closure stabilizes the backtracked state of RNA polymerase

All cellular RNA polymerases (RNAP) occasionally backtrack along the template DNA as part of transcriptional proofreading and regulation. Here, we studied the mechanism of RNAP backtracking by one nucleotide using two complementary approaches that allowed us to precisely measure the occupancy and lifetime of the backtracked state. Our data show that the stability of the backtracked state is critically dependent on the closure of the RNAP active site by a mobile domain, the trigger loop (TL). The lifetime and occupancy of the backtracked state measurably decreased by substitutions of the TL residues that interact with the nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) substrate, whereas amino acid substitutions that stabilized the closed active site increased the lifetime and occupancy. These results suggest that the same conformer of the TL closes the active site during catalysis of nucleotide incorporation into the nascent RNA and backtracking by one nucleotide. In support of this hypothesis, we construct a model of the 1-nt backtracked complex with the closed active site and the backtracked nucleotide in the entry pore area known as the E-site. We further propose that 1-nt backtracking mimics the reversal of the NTP substrate loading into the RNAP active site during on-pathway elongation.

σ38-dependent promoter-proximal pausing by bacterial RNA polymerase

Transcription initiation by bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) requires a variable σ subunit that directs it to promoters for site-specific priming of RNA synthesis. The principal σ subunit responsible for expression of house-keeping genes can bind the transcription elongation complex after initiation and induce RNAP pausing through specific interactions with promoter-like motifs in transcribed DNA. We show that the stationary phase and stress response σ³⁸ subunit can also induce pausing by Escherichia coli RNAP on DNA templates containing promoter-like motifs in the transcribed regions. The pausing depends on σ³⁸ contacts with the DNA template and RNAP core enzyme and results in formation of backtracked transcription elongation complexes, which can be reactivated by Gre factors that induce RNA cleavage by RNAP. Our data suggest that σ³⁸ can bind the transcription elongation complex in trans but likely acts in cis during transcription initiation, by staying bound to RNAP and recognizing promoter-proximal pause signals. Analysis of σ³⁸-dependent promoters reveals that a substantial fraction of them contain potential pause-inducing motifs, suggesting that σ³⁸-depended pausing may be a common phenomenon in bacterial transcription.

Gfh factors and NusA cooperate to stimulate transcriptional pausing and termination

Lineage-specific Gfh factors from the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans, which bind within the secondary channel of RNA polymerase, stimulate transcriptional pausing at a wide range of pause signals (elemental, hairpin-dependent, post-translocated, backtracking-dependent, and consensus pauses) and increase intrinsic termination. Universal bacterial factor NusA, which binds near the RNA exit channel, enhances the effects of Gfh factors on termination and hairpin-dependent pausing but do not act on other pause sites. It is proposed that NusA and Gfh target different steps in the pausing pathway and may act together to regulate transcription under stress conditions. Thus, transcription factors that interact with nascent RNA in the RNA exit channel can communicate with secondary channel regulators to modulate RNA polymerase activities.

A link between transcription fidelity and pausing in vivo

Pausing by RNA polymerase is a major mechanism that regulates transcription elongation but can cause conflicts with fellow RNA polymerases and other cellular machineries. Here, we summarize our recent finding that misincorporation could be a major source of transcription pausing in vivo, and discuss the role of misincorporation-induced pausing.

RNA Capping by Transcription Initiation with Non-canonical Initiating Nucleotides (NCINs): Determination of Relative Efficiencies of Transcription Initiation with NCINs and NTPs

It recently has been established that adenine-containing cofactors, including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺), reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), and 3'-desphospho-coenzyme A (dpCoA), can serve as 'non-canonical initiating nucleotides' (NCINs) for transcription initiation by bacterial and eukaryotic cellular RNA polymerases (RNAPs) and that the efficiency of the reaction is determined by promoter sequence (Bird et al., 2016). Here we describe a protocol to quantify the relative efficiencies of transcription initiation using an NCIN vs. transcription initiation using a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) for a given promoter sequence.

The mechanism of RNA 5′ capping with NAD+, NADH and desphospho-CoA

The chemical nature of the 5′ end of RNA is a key determinant of RNA stability, processing, localization, translation efficiency^1,2, and has been proposed to provide a layer of “epitranscriptomic” gene regulation³. Recently it has been shown that some bacterial RNA species carry a 5′-end structure reminiscent of the 5′ 7-methylguanylate “cap” in eukaryotic RNA. In particular, RNA species containing a 5′-end nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) or 3′-desphospho-coenzyme A (dpCoA) have been identified in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria^3–6. It has been proposed that NAD⁺, reduced NAD⁺ (NADH), and dpCoA caps are added to RNA after transcription initiation, in a manner analogous to the addition of 7-methylguanylate caps^6–8. Here, we show instead that NAD⁺, NADH, and dpCoA are incorporated into RNA during transcription initiation, by serving as non-canonical initiating nucleotides (NCINs) for de novo transcription initiation by cellular RNA polymerase (RNAP). We further show that both bacterial RNAP and eukaryotic RNAP II incorporate NCIN caps, that promoter DNA sequences at and upstream of the transcription start site determine the efficiency of NCIN capping, that NCIN capping occurs in vivo, and that NCIN capping has functional consequences. We report crystal structures of transcription initiation complexes containing NCIN-capped RNA products. Our results define the mechanism and structural basis of NCIN capping, and suggest that NCIN-mediated “ab initio capping” may occur in all organisms

A universal transcription pause sequence is an element of initiation factor σ70-dependent pausing

The Escherichia coli σ70 initiation factor is required for a post-initiation, promoter-proximal pause essential for regulation of lambdoid phage late gene expression; potentially, σ70 acts at other sites during transcription elongation as well. The pause is induced by σ70 binding to a repeat of the promoter -10 sequence. After σ70 binding, further RNA synthesis occurs as DNA is drawn (or 'scrunched') into the enzyme complex, presumably exactly as occurs during initial synthesis from the promoter; this synthesis then pauses at a defined site several nucleotides downstream from the active center position when σ70 first engages the -10 sequence repeat. We show that the actual pause site in the stabilized, scrunched complex is the 'elemental pause sequence' recognized from its frequent occurrence in the E. coli genome. σ70 binding and the elemental pause sequence together, but neither alone, produce a substantial transcription pause.

Transcription elongation. Heterogeneous tracking of RNA polymerase and its biological implications

Regulation of transcription elongation via pausing of RNA polymerase has multiple physiological roles. The pausing mechanism depends on the sequence heterogeneity of the DNA being transcribed, as well as on certain interactions of polymerase with specific DNA sequences. In order to describe the mechanism of regulation, we introduce the concept of heterogeneity into the previously proposed alternative models of elongation, power stroke and Brownian ratchet. We also discuss molecular origins and physiological significances of the heterogeneity.

Two transcription pause elements underlie a σ70-dependent pause cycle

The movement of RNA polymerase (RNAP) during transcription elongation is modulated by DNA-encoded elements that cause the elongation complex to pause. One of the best-characterized pause sequences is a binding site for the σ(70) initiation factor that induces pausing at a site near lambdoid phage late-gene promoters. An essential component of this σ(70)-dependent pause is the elemental pause site (EPS), a sequence that itself induces transcription pausing throughout the Escherichia coli genome and underlies other complex regulatory pause elements, such as the ops and his operon pauses. Here, we identify and provide a detailed kinetic analysis of a transcription cycle analogous to abortive cycling that underlies the σ(70)-dependent pause. We show that, in σ(70)-dependent pausing, the elemental pause acts primarily to modulate the rate at which complexes attempt to disengage the σ(70):DNA interaction. Our findings establish the σ(70)-dependent pause-encoding region as a multipartite element in which several pause-inducing components make distinct mechanistic contributions to the induction and maintenance of a regulatory transcription pause.

Regulation of promoter-proximal transcription elongation: enhanced DNA scrunching drives λQ antiterminator-dependent escape from a σ70-dependent pause

During initial transcription, RNA polymerase remains bound at the promoter and synthesizes RNA without movement along the DNA template, drawing downstream DNA into itself in a process called scrunching and thereby storing energy to sever the bonds that hold the enzyme at the promoter. We show that DNA scrunching also is the driving force behind the escape of RNA polymerase from a regulatory pause of the late gene operon of bacteriophage λ, and that this process is enhanced by the activity of the Q(λ) antiterminator. Furthermore, we show that failure of transcription complexes to escape the pause results in backtracking and arrest in a process analogous to abortive initiation. We identify a sequence element that modulates both abortive synthesis and the formation of arrested elongation complexes.

Distinct functions of the RNA polymerase σ subunit region 3.2 in RNA priming and promoter escape

The σ subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) has been implicated in all steps of transcription initiation, including promoter recognition and opening, priming of RNA synthesis, abortive initiation and promoter escape. The post-promoter-recognition σ functions were proposed to depend on its conserved region σ3.2 that directly contacts promoter DNA immediately upstream of the RNAP active centre and occupies the RNA exit path. Analysis of the transcription effects of substitutions and deletions in this region in Escherichia coli σ⁷⁰ subunit, performed in this work, suggests that (i) individual residues in the σ3.2 finger collectively contribute to RNA priming by RNAP, likely by the positioning of the template DNA strand in the active centre, but are not critical to promoter escape; (ii) the physical presence of σ3.2 in the RNA exit channel is important for promoter escape; (iii) σ3.2 promotes σ dissociation during initiation and suppresses σ-dependent promoter-proximal pausing; (iv) σ3.2 contributes to allosteric inhibition of the initiating NTP binding by rifamycins. Thus, region σ3.2 performs distinct functions in transcription initiation and its inhibition by antibiotics. The B-reader element of eukaryotic factor TFIIB likely plays similar roles in RNAPII transcription, revealing common principles in transcription initiation in various domains of life.

RNA polymerase backtracking in gene regulation and genome instability

RNA polymerase is a ratchet machine that oscillates between productive and backtracked states at numerous DNA positions. Since its first description 15 years ago, backtracking--the reversible sliding of RNA polymerase along DNA and RNA--has been implicated in many critical processes in bacteria and eukaryotes, including the control of transcription elongation, pausing, termination, fidelity, and genome instability.

Characteristics of σ-dependent pausing by RNA polymerases from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus

The σ(70) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the major transcription initiation factor in Escherichia coli. During transcription initiation, conserved region 2 of the σ(70) subunit interacts with the -10 promoter element and plays a key role in DNA melting around the starting point of transcription. During transcription elongation, the σ(70) subunit can induce pauses in RNA synthesis owing to interactions of region 2 with DNA regions similar to the -10 promoter element. We demonstrated that the major σ subunit from Thermus aquaticus (σ(A)) is also able to induce transcription pausing by T. aquaticus RNAP. However, hybrid RNAP containing the σ(A) subunit and E. coli core RNAP is unable to form pauses during elongation, while being able to recognize promoters and initiate transcription. Inability of the σ(A) subunit to induce pausing by E. coli RNAP is explained by the substitutions of non-conserved amino acids in region 2, in the subregions interacting with the RNAP core enzyme. Thus, changes in the structure of region 2 of the σ(70) subunit have stronger effects on transcription pausing than on promoter recognition, likely by weakening the interactions of the σ subunit with the core RNAP during transcription elongation.

Structural transitions in the transcription elongation complexes of bacterial RNA polymerase during σ-dependent pausing

A transcription initiation factor, the σ⁷⁰ subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) induces transcription pausing through the binding to a promoter-like pause-inducing sequence in the DNA template during transcription elongation. Here, we investigated the mechanism of σ-dependent pausing using reconstituted transcription elongation complexes which allowed highly efficient and precisely controlled pause formation. We demonstrated that, following engagement of the σ subunit to the pause site, RNAP continues RNA synthesis leading to formation of stressed elongation complexes, in which the nascent RNA remains resistant to Gre-induced cleavage while the transcription bubble and RNAP footprint on the DNA template extend in downstream direction, likely accompanied by DNA scrunching. The stressed complexes can then either break σ-mediated contacts and continue elongation or isomerize to a backtracked conformation. Suppressing of the RNAP backtracking decreases pausing and increases productive elongation. On the contrary, core RNAP mutations that impair RNAP interactions with the downstream part of the DNA template stimulate pausing, presumably by destabilizing the stressed complexes. We propose that interplay between DNA scrunching and RNAP backtracking may have an essential role in transcription pausing and its regulation in various systems.

Factor-independent transcription pausing caused by recognition of the RNA-DNA hybrid sequence

RNA polymerase pausing during transcription is implicated in controlling gene expression. This study identifies a new type of pausing mechanism, by which the RNAP core recognizes the shape of base pairs of the RNA–DNA hybrid, which determines the rate of translocation and the nucleotide addition cycle. The expression of a number of viral and bacterial genes is shown to be subject to this mechanism.

Pausing of transcription is an important step of regulation of gene expression in bacteria and eukaryotes. Here we uncover a factor-independent mechanism of transcription pausing, which is determined by the ability of the elongating RNA polymerase to recognize the sequence of the RNA–DNA hybrid. We show that, independently of thermodynamic stability of the elongation complex, RNA polymerase directly ‘senses' the shape and/or identity of base pairs of the RNA–DNA hybrid. Recognition of the RNA–DNA hybrid sequence delays translocation by RNA polymerase, and thus slows down the nucleotide addition cycle through ‘in pathway' mechanism. We show that this phenomenon is conserved among bacterial and eukaryotic RNA polymerases, and is involved in regulatory pauses, such as a pause regulating the production of virulence factors in some bacteria and a pause regulating transcription/replication of HIV-1. The results indicate that recognition of RNA–DNA hybrid sequence by multi-subunit RNA polymerases is involved in transcription regulation and may determine the overall rate of transcription elongation.

Transcription factor GreA contributes to resolving promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase in Bacillus subtilis cells

Bacterial Gre factors associate with RNA polymerase (RNAP) and stimulate intrinsic cleavage of the nascent transcript at the active site of RNAP. Biochemical and genetic studies to date have shown that Escherichia coli Gre factors prevent transcriptional arrest during elongation and enhance transcription fidelity. Furthermore, Gre factors participate in the stimulation of promoter escape and the suppression of promoter-proximal pausing during the beginning of RNA synthesis in E. coli. Although Gre factors are conserved in general bacteria, limited functional studies have been performed in bacteria other than E. coli. In this investigation, ChAP-chip analysis (chromatin affinity precipitation coupled with DNA microarray) was conducted to visualize the distribution of Bacillus subtilis GreA on the chromosome and to determine the effects of GreA inactivation on core RNAP trafficking. Our data show that GreA is uniformly distributed in the transcribed region from the promoter to coding region with core RNAP, and its inactivation induces RNAP accumulation at many promoter or promoter-proximal regions. Based on these findings, we propose that GreA would constantly associate with core RNAP during transcriptional initiation and elongation and resolves its stalling at promoter or promoter-proximal regions, thus contributing to the even distribution of RNAP along the promoter and coding regions in B. subtilis cells.

Σ(70)-dependent transcription pausing in Escherichia coli

After promoter escape in Escherichia coli, the initiating σ(70) factor is retained by core RNA polymerase (RNAP) for at least tens of nucleotides. While it is bound, σ(70) can engage a repeat of a promoter DNA element located downstream of the promoter and thereby induce a transcription pause. The σ(70)-dependent promoter-proximal pause that occurs at all lambdoid phage late gene promoters is essential to regulation of the late gene operons. Several, and possibly many, E. coli promoters have associated σ(70)-dependent pauses. Clearly characterized σ(70)-dependent pauses occur within 25 nucleotides of the start site, but σ(70)-dependent pausing might occur farther downstream as well. In this review, we summarize evidence for σ(70)-dependent promoter-proximal and promoter-distal pausing, and we discuss its potential regulatory function and mechanistic basis.

Initial transcribed region sequences influence the composition and functional properties of the bacterial elongation complex

The bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme consists of a catalytic core enzyme (α(2)ββ'ω) in complex with a σ factor that is essential for promoter recognition and transcription initiation. During early elongation, the stability of interactions between σ and the remainder of the transcription complex decreases. Nevertheless, there is no mechanistic requirement for release of σ upon the transition to elongation. Furthermore, σ can remain associated with RNAP during transcription elongation and influence regulatory events that occur during transcription elongation. Here we demonstrate that promoter-like DNA sequence elements within the initial transcribed region that are known to induce early elongation pausing through sequence-specific interactions with σ also function to increase the σ content of downstream elongation complexes. Our findings establish σ-dependent pausing as a mechanism by which initial transcribed region sequences can influence the composition and functional properties of the transcription elongation complex over distances of at least 700 base pairs.