Utility of Ki67 immunostaining in the grading of pineal parenchymal tumours: a multicentre study

Embryonal and pineal tumours

Embryonal and pineal tumours represent a diverse group of central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. While many of the small round blue cell tumours that make up the embryonal neoplasms share similar histologic qualities, there are several morphologic and cytologic characteristics that are useful in distinguishing different tumour types. Similarly, pineal parenchymal tumours represent clinically diverse tumours, ranging from benign to overtly malignant. The most recent iteration of the World Health Organization Classification of CNS Tumours expanded greatly on the significance of molecular alterations in brain tumour diagnostics. In this article, we summarize the salient cytologic and histologic features of CNS embryonal and pineal tumours, and highlight diagnostically relevant molecular alterations within each tumour type.

A Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation in an Octogenarian Contains a Rare KBTBD4 Insertion

Pineal parenchymal tumors are rare central nervous system tumors that pose diagnostic challenges for surgical pathologists. Due to their paucity, their clinicopathologic features are still being defined. We report an 86-year-old woman with a remote history of breast lobular carcinoma who presented with a 2-month neurologic history that included gait instability, blurry vision, and headaches. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lobular, heterogeneously enhancing pineal region mass compressing the aqueduct of Sylvius. A biopsy performed concomitant with endoscopic third ventriculostomy consisted of small sheets of cells with eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm, multipolar processes, and ovoid nuclei with stippled chromatin. Whole exome sequencing revealed a small in-frame insertion (duplication) in exon 4 of KBTBD4 (c.931_939dup, p.P311_R313dup/ p.R313_M314insPRR), which has very recently been reported in 2 pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID). Additionally, variants of uncertain significance in CEBPA (c.863G > C, p.R288P) and MYC (c.655T > C, p.S219P) were identified. Although PPTID is considered a disease of young adulthood, review of 2 institutional cohorts of patients with pineal region tumors revealed that 25% of individuals with PPTID were over 65 years of age. In conclusion, PPTID should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pineal region tumors in older adults.

Spinal Dissemination of Pineal Parenchymal Tumors of Intermediate Differentiation Over 10 Years After Initial Treatment: A Case Report

Pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) are rare, accounting for less than 0.3% of all primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) (WHO grade 2 or 3) show an intermediate prognosis between pineocytoma and pineoblastoma. The clinical course is unknown, and the optimal treatment for PPTID, especially for recurrence, has not been determined. We report a case of PPTID with spinal dissemination over 10 years after treatment and survival for four years. A 56-year-old woman presented with headaches and diplopia. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a pineal mass, but leptomeningeal dissemination was not identified on whole-spine MRI. Microsurgical gross total tumor resection (GTR) was performed, and the pathological diagnosis was PPTID (grade 3). In addition, a later study found it to harbor a KBTBD4 mutation. She underwent whole-brain radiation therapy with a focal boost. The patient was unable to continue chemotherapy for severe myelosuppression after the first course of treatment. Eleven years after the surgery, she was unable to walk, and a whole-spine MRI revealed multiple masses at C3-4, T4, and cauda equina. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed accumulations of the same lesions. No recurrence was observed in the brain. A biopsy of the caudal portion was performed, and the histopathological findings were the same as those of the initial surgery. Spinal dissemination was refractory to chemotherapy but responded to whole spine radiotherapy with focal boost, and she remained tumor-free for four years. We considered good local control with a combination of GTR and subsequent radiation therapy to contribute to long-term survival. The timing of spinal radiation administration is controversial because of the tendency for late cerebrospinal dissemination. The importance of long-term follow-up of the spine and head is emphasized. In PPTID cases with good local control, withholding spinal radiation until spinal dissemination occurs may become a long-term treatment plan.

Understanding and Managing Pineal Parenchymal Tumors of Intermediate Differentiation: An In-Depth Exploration from Pathology to Adjuvant Therapies

BACKGROUND

Pineal parenchymal cell tumors constitute a rare group of primary central nervous system neoplasms (less than 1%). Their classification, especially the intermediate subtype (PPTIDs), remains challenging.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted, navigating through anatomo-pathological, radiotherapy, and neurosurgical dimensions, aiming for a holistic understanding of these tumors.

RESULTS

PPTIDs, occupying an intermediate spectrum of malignancy, reveal diverse histological patterns, mitotic activity, and distinct methylation profiles. Surgical treatment is the gold standard, but when limited to partial removal, radiotherapy becomes crucial. While surgical approaches are standardized, due to the low prevalence of the pathology and absence of randomized prospective studies, there are no shared guidelines about radiation treatment modalities.

CONCLUSION

Surgical removal remains pivotal, demanding a personalized approach based on the tumor extension. This review underscores the considerable variability in treatment approaches and reported survival rates within the existing literature, emphasizing the need for ongoing research to better define optimal therapeutic strategies and prognostic factors for PPTIDs, aiming for further and more detailed stratification among them.

Histopathology and molecular pathology of pediatric pineal parenchymal tumors

Pineal parenchymal tumors in children are rare. They consist of two main types, pineoblastoma (PB) and pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), which are World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 and grade 2-3 respectively. PBs are divided into four distinct molecular groups: PB-miRNA1, PB-miRNA2, PB-RB1, and PB-MYC/FOXR2. PB-RB1 and PB-MYC/FOXR2 affect young children and are associated with a dismal prognosis. PB-miRNA1 and PB-miRNA2 groups affect older children and follow a more favorable course. They are characterized by mutually exclusive alterations in genes involved in miRNA biogenesis, including DICER1, DROSHA, and DGCR8. They may be sporadic or may represent one manifestation of DICER1 syndrome. PB-RB1 tumors show alterations in the RB1 gene and may develop in the setting of congenital retinoblastoma, a condition known as "trilateral retinoblastoma." In the pediatric population, PPTIDs typically affect adolescents. They are characterized by small in-frame insertions in the KBTBD4 gene which is involved in ubiquitination.

Role of proliferative marker index and KBTBD4 mutation in the pathological diagnosis of pineal parenchymal tumors

Pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) are clinically rare and a biopsy is often required for a definitive diagnosis. To improve the accuracy of histological assessment of PPTs, we examined the proliferative capacity of PPT cells and investigated DICER1 expression and KBTBD4 mutations. This study included 19 cases of PPTs [3 pineocytomas (PCs), 10 PPTs of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), and 6 pineoblastomas (PBs)]. Immunohistochemistry for Ki-67, PHH3, and DICER1, as well as Sanger sequencing analysis for KBTBD4 mutations, was performed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens that were resected during surgery. Tumor cell proliferation was quantified using an image analysis software. For the PHH3 and MIB-1 indices, a significant difference was observed between the PPTIDs and PBs (P < 0.05). Loss of DICER1 was not specific for PB; 0/3 PCs (0.0%), 2/9 PPTIDs (22.2%), and 2/4 PBs (50.0%). KBTBD4 mutations were detected in 1/3 PCs (33.3%), 6/9 PPTIDs (66.7%), and 0/4 PBs (0.0%). Thus, combined application of the proliferative marker index and KBTBD4 mutation analysis may be useful for the differential diagnosis of PPTs. Furthermore, detection of KBTBD4 mutations using Sanger sequencing analysis may support the diagnosis of PPTID.

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: a systematic review and contemporary management of 389 cases reported during the last two decades

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is a WHO grade II and III tumor arising from pineal parenchymal cells. PPTID is a rare tumor accounting for less than 1% of all primary central nervous system neoplasms. Therefore, reports describing the clinical characteristics and biological features of PPTID are lacking. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy remains controversial. The current study aimed to evaluate treatment results and problems of contemporary therapeutic modalities of PPTID based on its features compared with other pineal parenchymal tumors. A comprehensive systematic literature review of 69 articles was performed, including articles on PPTID (389 patients) and similar tumors. Patient demographics, disease presentation, imaging characteristics, biological features, and current therapeutic options and their results were reviewed. We found that histopathological findings based on current WHO classification are well associated with survival; however, identifying and treating aggressive PPTID cases with uncommon features could be problematic. A molecular and genetic approach may help improve diagnostic accuracy. Therapeutic strategy, especially for grade III and aforementioned uncommon and aggressive tumors, remains controversial. A combination therapy involving maximum tumor resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy could be the first line of treatment. However, although challenging, a large prospective study would be required to identify ways to improve the clinical results of PPTID treatment.

Rare Primary Central Nervous System Tumors in Adults: An Overview

Overall, tumors of primary central nervous system (CNS) are quite common in adults with an incidence rate close to 30 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. Significant clinical and biological advances have been accomplished in the most common adult primary CNS tumors (i.e., diffuse gliomas). However, most CNS tumor subtypes are rare with an incidence rate below the threshold defining rare disease of 6.0 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. Close to 150 entities of primary CNS tumors have now been identified by the novel integrated histomolecular classification published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and its updates by the c-IMPACT NOW consortium (the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy). While these entities can be better classified into smaller groups either by their histomolecular features and/or by their location, assessing their treatment by clinical trials and improving the survival of patients remain challenging. Despite these tumors are rare, research, and advances remain slower compared to diffuse gliomas for instance. In some cases (i.e., ependymoma, medulloblastoma) the understanding is high because single or few driver mutations have been defined. The European Union has launched European Reference Networks (ERNs) dedicated to support advances on the clinical side of rare diseases including rare cancers. The ERN for rare solid adult tumors is termed EURACAN. Within EURACAN, Domain 10 brings together the European patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and physicians dedicated to improving outcomes in rare primary CNS tumors and also aims at supporting research, care and teaching in the field. In this review, we discuss the relevant biological and clinical characteristics, clinical management of patients, and research directions for the following types of rare primary CNS tumors: medulloblastoma, pineal region tumors, glioneuronal and rare glial tumors, ependymal tumors, grade III meningioma and mesenchymal tumors, primary central nervous system lymphoma, germ cell tumors, spinal cord tumors and rare pituitary tumors.

Pathologic Prognostic Factors of Pineal Parenchymal Tumor of Intermediate Differentiation

INTRODUCTION

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is an uncommon tumor of the pineal gland. Although this behaves as a grade II/III tumor, the exact clinical behavior is not well known. There is no well-established pathologic factor that can predict the behavior of PPTID.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the pathologic prognostic factors in PPTID.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All PPTID cases diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin, neurofilament protein (NFP), glial fibrillar acid protein, NeuN, and Ki-67 were performed in all cases. Cases were classified arbitrarily into low grade (mitosis <4/10 hpf and Ki-67 <5%) and high grade (mitosis ≥4/10 hpf and Ki-67 ≥5%). Clinical details including follow-up information were retrieved from the patients' files.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients (6 low grade and 10 high grade) were included in this study. The age ranged from 2 to 55 years (average, 28.2) with a mild male preponderance (male:female, 1.67:1). All cases showed strong and diffuse positivity for synaptophysin. Focal NFP positivity was seen in 2 low-grade and 3 high-grade tumors. Only 2 cases showed focal NeuN positivity. Average Ki-67 index was 1.7% and 12.6% in low-grade and high-grade tumors, respectively. All patients with low-grade tumor were alive without recurrence. Among the patients with high-grade tumors, 2 had local recurrence, 1 had spinal metastasis, and 3 patients died.

CONCLUSION

Mitosis and Ki-67 proliferation index are the most important pathologic prognostic factors in PPTID. NFP expression does not carry any prognostic significance.

Modeling germline mutations in pineoblastoma uncovers lysosome disruption-based therapy

Pineoblastoma is a rare pediatric cancer induced by germline mutations in the tumor suppressors RB1 or DICER1. Presence of leptomeningeal metastases is indicative of poor prognosis. Here we report that inactivation of Rb plus p53 via a WAP-Cre transgene, commonly used to target the mammary gland during pregnancy, induces metastatic pineoblastoma resembling the human disease with 100% penetrance. A stabilizing mutation rather than deletion of p53 accelerates metastatic dissemination. Deletion of Dicer1 plus p53 via WAP-Cre also predisposes to pineoblastoma, albeit with lower penetrance. In silico analysis predicts tricyclic antidepressants such as nortriptyline as potential therapeutics for both pineoblastoma models. Nortriptyline disrupts the lysosome, leading to accumulation of non-functional autophagosome, cathepsin B release and pineoblastoma cell death. Nortriptyline further synergizes with the antineoplastic drug gemcitabine to effectively suppress pineoblastoma in our preclinical models, offering new modality for this lethal childhood malignancy.

Pineoblastoma segregates into molecular sub-groups with distinct clinico-pathologic features: a Rare Brain Tumor Consortium registry study

Pineoblastomas (PBs) are rare, aggressive pediatric brain tumors of the pineal gland with modest overall survival despite intensive therapy. We sought to define the clinical and molecular spectra of PB to inform new treatment approaches for this orphan cancer. Tumor, blood, and clinical data from 91 patients with PB or supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (sPNETs/CNS-PNETs), and 2 pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs) were collected from 29 centres in the Rare Brain Tumor Consortium. We used global DNA methylation profiling to define a core group of PB from 72/93 cases, which were delineated into five molecular sub-groups. Copy number, whole exome and targeted sequencing, and miRNA expression analyses were used to evaluate the clinico-pathologic significance of each sub-group. Tumors designated as group 1 and 2 almost exclusively exhibited deleterious homozygous loss-of-function alterations in miRNA biogenesis genes (DICER1, DROSHA, and DGCR8) in 62 and 100% of group 1 and 2 tumors, respectively. Recurrent alterations of the oncogenic MYC-miR-17/92-RB1 pathway were observed in the RB and MYC sub-group, respectively, characterized by RB1 loss with gain of miR-17/92, and recurrent gain or amplification of MYC. PB sub-groups exhibited distinct clinical features: group 1-3 arose in older children (median ages 5.2-14.0 years) and had intermediate to excellent survival (5-year OS of 68.0-100%), while Group RB and MYC PB patients were much younger (median age 1.3-1.4 years) with dismal survival (5-year OS 37.5% and 28.6%, respectively). We identified age < 3 years at diagnosis, metastatic disease, omission of upfront radiation, and chr 16q loss as significant negative prognostic factors across all PBs. Our findings demonstrate that PB exhibits substantial molecular heterogeneity with sub-group-associated clinical phenotypes and survival. In addition to revealing novel biology and therapeutics, molecular sub-grouping of PB can be exploited to reduce treatment intensity for patients with favorable biology tumors.

Pineal Parenchymal Tumors of Intermediate Differentiation: A long-Term Follow-Up Study in Helsinki Neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs) are rare lesions with particular features compared with other pineal parenchymal tumors.

METHODS

We present a retrospective review of patients with histologically confirmed PPTIDs who were operated on in our department between 1997 and 2015. A demographic analysis and an evaluation of preoperative status, surgical treatment, as well as immediate and long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes were conducted.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with PPTIDs were operated on between 1997 and 2015. Gross total removal was achieved in 11 cases; 2 patients underwent near-total resection, 1 partial resection, and 1 received brachytherapy after an endoscopic biopsy. Nine patients required external radiation therapy (4 due to a pleomorphic histology of their lesion including pineoblastoma features in 3 of them; 3 after a subtotal resection; and 2 for tumor recurrence). No patient received chemotherapy. The survival rate of our patients was 57.1% at a mean follow-up of 137.2 ± 77.6 months (39-248 months).

CONCLUSIONS

A proper multidisciplinary management of PPTIDs based on a gross total removal of the lesion, and an adjuvant radiotherapy in selected cases, may improve the overall survival of these aggressive tumors.

Morphofunctional and signaling molecules overlap of the pineal gland and thymus: role and significance in aging

Deficits in neuroendocrine-immune system functioning, including alterations in pineal and thymic glands, contribute to aging-associated diseases. This study looks at ageing-associated alterations in pineal and thymic gland functioning evaluating common signaling molecules present in both human and animal pinealocytes and thymocytes: endocrine cell markers (melatonin, serotonin, pCREB, AANAT, CGRP, VIP, chromogranin A); cell renovation markers (p53, AIF, Ki67), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP2, MMP9) and lymphocytes markers (CD4, CD5, CD8, CD20). Pineal melatonin is decreased, as is one of the melatonin pathway synthesis enzymes in the thymic gland. A further similarity is the increased MMPs levels evident over age in both glands. Significant differences are evident in cell renovation processes, which deteriorate more quickly in the aged thymus versus the pineal gland. Decreases in the number of pineal B-cells and thymic T-cells were also observed over aging. Collected data indicate that cellular involution of the pineal gland and thymus show many commonalities, but also significant changes in aging-associated proteins. It is proposed that such ageing-associated alterations in these two glands provide novel pharmaceutical targets for the wide array of medical conditions that are more likely to emerge over the course of ageing.

Nuclear CRX and FOXJ1 Expression Differentiates Non-Germ Cell Pineal Region Tumors and Supports the Ependymal Differentiation of Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region

Papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) is a neuroepithelial neoplasm first described in 2003. Despite the anatomic association of PTPR with the pineal gland, the features of these tumors resemble those of the ependymal circumventricular subcommissural organ (SCO) of the posterior third ventricle. Given the presumed distinct derivation of PTPR and pineal parenchymal tumors, we hypothesized that expression of lineage-specific transcription factors could distinguish these tumors and provide additional insight into the differentiation of PTPR. A broad series of pineal region samples was reviewed, including 7 benign pineal glands, 4 pineal cysts, 13 pineocytomas, 28 pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation, 11 pineoblastomas, and 18 PTPR. All samples were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for expression of CRX, a master transcriptional regulator of photoreceptor differentiation expressed in pineal gland and retina and/or FOXJ1, a master transcriptional regulator of ciliogenesis expressed in normal ependymal cells and ependymal neoplasms. Diffuse nuclear CRX expression is present in 100% of pineal samples. FOXJ1 is negative in all pineal samples. CRX staining is present in 53% of PTPR, though expression is nearly always limited to rare cells. Diffuse nuclear FOXJ1 expression is present in 100% of PTPR. Fetal human SCO diffusely expressed FOXJ1 but was negative for CRX. Immunohistochemistry for FOXJ1 and CRX differentiates non-germ cell pineal region tumors with high sensitivity and specificity, including pineal parenchymal tumors and PTPR. Our findings support the hypothesis that PTPR have ependymal differentiation and are phenotypically more similar to SCO than pineal gland.

Twenty-seven cases of pineal parenchymal tumours of intermediate differentiation: mitotic count, Ki-67 labelling index and extent of resection predict prognosis

OBJECTIVE

Optimal grading and treatment of pineal parenchymal tumours of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) have not been established due to their rarity. After careful review of more than 500 pineal region tumours treated in our centre, 27 patients with PPTID were identified.

METHODS

Diagnoses were confirmed according to WHO classification and graded as suggested by Jouvet et al. The relationship between the WHO grade, histopathological characters, management and outcome was analysed.

RESULTS

The WHO grade did not demonstrate significant correlation with outcome. Mitotic count and Ki-67 labelling index (LI) were detected as prognostic factors. Stratification of patients by mitotic count and Ki-67 LI correlated significantly with overall survival and progression-free survival. All the patients underwent resection. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 16/27 (59.3%) patients, subtotal resection in 6/27 (22.2%) patients and partial resection in 5/27 (18.5%) patients. Log rank test confirmed GTR correlated with significantly better survival. Adjuvant therapy had a tendency to correlate significantly with progression-free survival. Among the high-risk patients, 6/9 patients with residual tumour received radiotherapy and 50% (3/6) were free of local tumour recurrence. In the other three high-risk patients with residual tumour who did not receive adjuvant therapy, recurrence occurred early and Ki-67 LI predicted prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk evaluation combining mitotic count and Ki-67 LI predicts prognosis. Surgery is the most efficient management. GTR is related to better prognosis. If GTR is not achieved, adjuvant therapy might delay tumour progression or recurrence, especially in high-risk patients.

Pineal parenchymal tumours of intermediate differentiation - An evidence-based review of a new pathological entity

Pineal region lesions are uncommon, and pineal parenchymal tumours (PPT) account for 20-30% of tumours in this area of which pineocytomas (PCs) and pineoblastomas (PBs) are more prevalent. In 2007, the World Health Organisation (WHO) reclassified PPT from two subgroups (PC and PB) into four, including pineal parenchymal tumours of intermediate differentiation (PPTID). PPTID have been further divided into low- and high-grade lesions (WHO II and III), but due to their rarity have proven difficult lesions to diagnose and a paucity of literature means their optimal treatment options are a challenge to define. This article is a review of the literature of PPTID highlighting diagnostic criteria, a discussion on the role of surgery and radiotherapy, including treatment paradigms and reported outcomes for these problematic neoplasms.

Diffusion characteristics of pediatric pineal tumors

BACKGROUND

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has been shown to be helpful in characterizing tumor cellularity, and predicting histology. Several works have evaluated this technique for pineal tumors; however studies to date have not focused on pediatric pineal tumors.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the diffusion characteristics of pediatric pineal tumors to confirm if patterns seen in studies using mixed pediatric and adult populations remain valid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. We retrospectively evaluated all patients 18 years of age and younger with pineal tumors from a single institution where preoperative diffusion weighted imaging as well as histologic characterization was available.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (13 male, 7 female) with pineal tumors were identified: seven with pineoblastoma, four with Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor (PNET), two with other pineal tumors, and seven with germ cell tumors including two germinomas, three teratomas, and one mixed germinoma-teratoma. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in pineoblastoma (544 ± 65 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s) and pineoblastoma/PNET (595 ± 144 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s) was lower than that of the germ cell tumors (1284 ± 334 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s; p < 0.0001 vs pineoblastoma). One highly cellular germinoma had an ADC value of 694 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s.

CONCLUSION

ADC values can aid in differentiation of pineoblastoma/PNET from germ cell tumors in a population of children with pineal masses.

Clinicopathologic study of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation

OBJECTIVE

Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) are extremely rare tumor entities, and only limited data are available regarding their pathologic features and biologic behaviors. Because grading criteria of pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) have yet to be established, the treatment strategy and prognosis of PPTIDs remain controversial. We describe the clinicopathologic study of six patients with PPTID and compare responses for the treatment and prognosis with cases of pineocytoma (PC) and pineoblastoma (PB). From this analysis, we attempt to clarify the treatment strategy for PPTIDs.

METHODS

This study included 15 patients with PPTs, consisting of 6 PCs, 6 PPTIDs, and 3 PBs. We focused on the 6 patients with PPTIDs. All PPTID cases were treated surgically, and radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered as adjuvant therapies in some cases. We have earlier reported the histopathologic study (Neuropathology 32:647-653, 2012). Briefly, we examined mitotic figures and necrosis by hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemical markers such as neuronal markers (synaptophysin, neurofilament (NF), and neuronal nuclear antigen), and an MIB-1 labeling index was determined.

RESULTS

In the PPTID cases, the extent of resection was variable and the recurrence rates among patients varied according to stage and treatment. All PC patients underwent total resection with no recurrence. All PB patients underwent resection and adjuvant therapy with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There were no recurrences in patients with PC or PB. The results of histopathologic findings have been already reported as mentioned above. Briefly, the results indicated no mitotic figure or necrosis in any of the six cases of PPTID, but those features were observed in PB cases. All cases even including PC and PB were immunopositive for neuronal markers. The MIB-1 labeling index of PPTID was 3.5%, whereas it was 0% in PC and 10.5% in PB.

CONCLUSIONS

Good radiosensitivity of PPTIDs was observed in our series. Because there are cases with discrepancies between images and pathologic findings, it is very difficult to determine the proper treatment strategy for PPTIDs. Proliferative potential was correlated with World Health Organization grade, although the immunoreactivity of neuronal markers did not correlate with the histologic grade.