The influence of haematoporphyrin derivative and visible light on murine skin graft survival, epidermal Langerhans cells and stimulation of the allogeneic mixed leucocyte reaction

The immunosuppressive side of PDT

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising novel therapeutic procedure for the management of a variety of solid tumors and many non-malignant diseases. PDT has been described as having a significant effect on the immune system, which may be either immunostimulatory or, in some circumstances, immunosuppressive. The immunosuppressive effects of PDT have nearly all been concerned with the suppression of the contact hypersensitivity reaction in mice. Here, we review the immunosuppressive aspects of PDT treatment and discuss some additional mechanisms that may be involved.

Immunosuppression in phototherapy

The successful use of phototherapy, especially psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) therapy, in the treatment of a variety of skin diseases is well known. Because the pathology of diseases such as vitiligo, alopecia and lichen planus is thought to involve immune mechanisms, the beneficial effect of PUVA may be due to immunosuppression. PUVA treatment can induce suppression in two ways. In the first (local suppression) psoralen is applied topically, the skin is irradiated with UVA and the contact allergen is applied directly to the irradiated skin. The induction of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) is suppressed and suppressor cells are found in the spleens of treated animals. Systemic suppression results from the injection of psoralen followed by exposure to UVA. The contact allergen is then applied at a distant non-irradiated site. CHS is suppressed and antigen-specific suppressor cells are found in the spleens of treated mice. The ability to induce specific immunosuppression may provide novel methods of inhibiting unwanted immune responses. We have demonstrated that graft rejection and the induction of graft-versus-host disease can be suppressed in an antigen-specific manner by UV radiation. Thus phototherapy may provide promising new treatments for suppressing graft rejection and perhaps may be beneficial in the treatment of autoimmune disease and allergic reactions.

Photodynamic therapy: update 2006. Part 1: Photochemistry and photobiology

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a two-step therapeutic technique in which the topical or systemic delivery of photosensitizing drugs is followed by irradiation with visible light. Activated photosensitizers transfer energy to molecular oxygen, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS). The subsequent oxidation of lipids, amino acids and proteins induces cell necrosis and apoptosis. In addition, ROS indirectly stimulate the transcription and release of inflammatory mediators. The photosensitizers are selective, in that they penetrate and accumulate in tumour cells or in the endothelium of newly formed vessels while generally avoiding the surrounding healthy tissue. The mechanisms of penetration through the cell membrane and the pattern of subcellular localization strongly influence the type of cellular effect. The photobiology and photoimmunology of the haematoporphyrin (Hp) derivative and its purified, lyophilized and concentrated form porfimer sodium have been investigated over the past 30 years. However, interest in PDT in dermatology was not raised until the 1990s with the availability of a simple and effective technique, the topical application of aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) and its methyl ester (methyl aminolaevulinate, MAL) followed by irradiation with broadband red light. At the same time, several new 'second-generation' synthetic sensitizers (e.g. benzoporphyrin derivatives, phthalocyanines, chlorins and porphycenes) became available. These compounds are chemically pure, highly efficient, selective and safe, while offering the advantage that the generalized skin photosensitivity they produce lasts for only a short time. They are currently under clinical evaluation but have not yet been approved for clinical use. This paper provides an overview of the chemistry of the photosensitizers, the photobiology and photoimmunology of the photodynamic reaction as well as the photophysical characteristics of the light sources available for PDT.

Immunomodulatory aspects of photodynamic therapy

In its conventional form, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically effective technique with which to treat tumours accessible to visible light. PDT utilises light absorbing compounds which catalyse the generation of toxic oxygen species, to produce localised antitumour effects. It has become apparent over the past decade that PDT also exhibits immunomodulatory attributes. Experimental animals may possess heightened antitumour immunity after tumour ablation with PDT. In contrast, at sub-phototoxic levels of photosensitiser, in combination with whole body light irradiation, PDT lessened disease severity when applied in different models of autoimmunity. Although the behaviour of lymphocytes may be affected by treatment, the ability of PDT to down-regulate autoimmune processes appears to be related to its capacity to influence the immunostimulatory attributes of antigen presenting cells.

IL-10 does not play a role in cutaneous Photofrin photodynamic therapy-induced suppression of the contact hypersensitivity response

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment of both malignant and benign skin diseases has proven to be effective, and its use is increasing worldwide. However, preclinical studies using murine models have shown that PDT of the skin inhibits cell-mediated immune reactions, as measured by the suppression of the contact hypersensitivity (CHS) reaction. We have previously demonstrated that PDT enhances IL-10 expression in treated skin, and that the kinetics of induction of IL-10 is similar to the kinetics of suppression of systemic CHS reactions by cutaneous PDT. In the following report we have expanded upon these studies to demonstrate that cutaneous PDT, using Photofrin, induces elevated levels of systemic IL-10 that persist for at least 28 days following treatment. The increase in systemic IL-10 correlates to a prolonged suppression of CHS of at least 28 days following cutaneous PDT. IL-10 has been implicated as the causative agent in the suppression of cell-mediated immune reactions by UVB and transdermal PDT. However, in the studies reported here we demonstrate that the suppression of CHS by cutaneous PDT occurs via an IL-10 independent mechanism, as administration of anti-IL-10 antibodies had no effect on the ability of PDT to induce CHS suppression. These results were further confirmed using IL-10 knockout (KO) mice. Cutaneous PDT of IL-10 KO mice resulted in CHS suppression that was not significantly different from suppression induced in wild-type mice. Thus, it appears as though IL-10 does not play a role in CHS suppression by cutaneous PDT. Suppression of cell-mediated immune reactions by UVB and transdermal PDT is reversible by IL-12, which is critical for the development of these reactions. We show that administration of exogenous IL-12 is also able to reverse CHS suppression induced by cutaneous PDT, suggesting that whereas suppression of cell-mediated immune reactions by UVB, transdermal PDT and cutaneous PDT occurs via different mechanisms, a common regulatory point exists.

Characteristics of the Immunosuppression Induced by Cutaneous Photodynamic Therapy: Persistence, Antigen Specificity and Cell Type Involved¶

Relatively little is known about the immunosuppression induced in mice which have received cutaneous photodynamic therapy (PDT). Consequently, experiments were undertaken using mice which received dorsal PDT using Photofrin as the photosensitizer in an attempt to characterize the overall nature of the immunosuppression. Photoirradiation of mice at various times after injection indicated there was no correlation between photosensitivity and immunosuppression. The suppression was found to be adoptively transferable and antigen specific suggesting the generation of suppressor cells. Selective cell depletions prior to adoptive transfer indicated a CD4+ T cell to be responsible for the immunosuppression. Interestingly, using allogeneic spleen cells, no effect on the delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response was found. The results indicate that the suppression induced by cutaneous PDT, with the exception of the lack of DTH suppression, is similar to that induced by UVB irradiation but unlike that reported using laser PDT of the peritoneal cavity. This suggests that not only the type of photoirradiation but also the site of photoirradiation might determine the character of the induced immunosuppression.

IL-10 contributes to the inhibition of contact hypersensitivity in mice treated with photodynamic therapy

We have explored the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin on the induction and expression of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) in normal mice and IL-10-deficient mice. Our results indicate that DNFB sensitized mice given PDT with verteporfin and whole body red light irradiation exhibited a significant reduction in CHS compared with control animals. Administration of rIL-12 reversed the effect(s) of PDT as did treatment of mice with anti-IL-10-neutralizing Ab. Knockout mice deficient in IL-10 were found to be resistant to the inhibitory effects of PDT. In vitro proliferative responses using spleen cells from DNFB-sensitized and PDT-treated mice showed a significantly lower response to DNBS as compared with cells from DNFB-sensitized mice or DNFB and PDT-treated IL-10-deficient mice. Finally, naive mice exposed to PDT exhibited an increase in skin IL-10 levels, which peaked between 72 and 120 h post-PDT. Together these data support the role of IL-10 as a key modulator in the inhibition of the CHS response by whole body PDT.

Reduced xenograft rejection in rat striatum after pretransplant photodynamic therapy of murine neural xenografts

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to develop a method of reducing neural xenograft rejection by pretreating the graft with photodynamic therapy (PDT).

METHODS

Xenograft cell suspensions were prepared from fetal mouse mesencephalon, after which they were incubated for 30 minutes with various concentrations of a photosensitizer, verteporfin for injection, and light exposure. The xenograft cell suspensions were injected into the dopamine-depleted striata of 40 hemiparkinsonian rats assigned to different treatment groups. Four weeks after transplantation, xenograft function (determined by methamphetamine-induced rotation) and survival (determined by immunohistochemical staining for murine neurons) were compared. Group 1 animals (xenografts pretreated with 25 ng/ml verteporfin) and Group 3 animals (no verteporfin pretreatment, but daily administration of cyclosporin A) had significantly better xenograft survival and function compared with control animals (no pretreatment with verteporfin). Group 2 animals (xenografts pretreated with 250 ng/ml verteporfin) had no significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates improved neural xenograft survival and function when using pretransplant PDT of the graft in a rodent model. The potential benefits of this new therapy are its convenience (one pretransplant treatment) and its compatibility with host immunosuppression.

Inhibition of contact hypersensitivity with different analogs of benzoporphyrin derivative

Four structural analogs of benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD), a potent anti-tumor photosensitizer, were evaluated for their capacity to influence the immunologically-mediated contact hypersensitivity (CHS) response against the hapten 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB). Immunocompetent hairless strain mice received BPD monoacid ring A (BPD-MA, verteporfin) and returned to normal housing conditions or treated with 690 nm red light (transcutaneous photodynamic therapy, PDT). Unexpectedly, we found that mice given BPD-MA exhibited significantly reduced CHS ear swelling responses to DNFB upon antigenic challenge, whether or not they had been treated with PDT. A significant reduction in the CHS response to DNFB was observed when BPD-MA or PDT was given 48 or 24 h prior to, on the same day, or 24 or 72 h after DNFB sensitization. However, the magnitude of the CHS response was unaffected if these treatments were given 96 h after DNFB sensitization, 24 h before challenge with DNFB. Significantly reduced CHS responses also occurred in Balb/c mice given BPD-MA with or without PDT. Mice given BPD-MA but retained in total darkness throughout the experimental period generated full-fledged ear swelling responses to DNFB indicating that CHS suppression with BPD-MA was light dependent. BPD monoacid ring B (BPD-MB) strongly reduced the CHS response of Balb/c mice kept under ambient light while BPD diacid ring A (BPD-DA) and BPD diacid ring B (BPD-DB) also lowered the CHS response but were less effective than the monoacid forms. Other photosensitizers including Photofrin, tin etiopurpurin, and zinc phthalocyanine did not alter the CHS response of Balb/c mice maintained under ambient light. The ability of different BPD analogs to inhibit the CHS response in mice held under ambient light conditions appears related to the potent photosensitizing activity of these compounds.

Prolonged skin allograft survival after photodynamic therapy associated with modification of donor skin antigenicity

BACKGROUND

The ability to prolong graft survival, in some cases by depleting donor antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and the subsequent demonstration that lymphocytes stimulated by non-APCs become anergic, suggested that graft survival and tolerance induction might be achieved by manipulating donor APCs to render them incompetent. This possibility was tested in histoincompatible murine skin allograft with photodynamic therapy (PDT).

METHODS

Skin sections (C57BL/6) were exposed in vitro to low doses of benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD) (verteporfin) and light (A=690+/-10 nm; low-dose PDT) before implantation on recipients (BALB/c). Furthermore, the effect of the treatment on the surface molecules of donor-derived Langerhans cells (LC) was evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis; the effect of treatment on the LC alloreactivity in the mixed epidermal cell lymphocyte reaction was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Pretreating skin to be grafted with low-dose PDT can significantly prolong the survival of allografts from 9.3+/-2.2 (n=42) days (control group) to 16.9+/-1.7 days (n=20; treated group). Moreover, low-dose PDT significantly down-regulated the major histocompatibility complex and costimulatory (B7) molecules (60-90% reduction) on LC, but not LC-specific endocytic receptor (DEC-205), CD45, intercellulr adhesion molecule 1, LC viabilities, and ectophosphatase activity on LC. Additionally, this treatment significantly suppressed the ability of LC to stimulate alloreactive T cells to proliferate.

CONCLUSIONS

Since engaging T cell receptors in the absence of costimulation results in suboptimal activation of T cells and ultimately anergy, it appears that the immunomodulatory effects of low-dose PDT associated with extended engraftment may depend upon decreased LC expression of major histocompatibility complex and costimulatory molecules.

Photodynamic effect on the specific antitumor immune activity

Photofrin is a potent sensitizer which localizes, among other sites in membranes of malignant cells. To evaluate the effect of photodymanic therapy (PDT) on specific antitumoral immunological response, we used a chromium release assay to compare the specific cytolytic activity (CLA) of primed mouse spleen T lymphocytes sensitized against syngeneic mastocytoma P511 cells. P511 cells or lymphocytes or both were treated or not with Photofrin and/or light (514 nm). Photofrin alone (1 microg/ml, 2 h) reduced CLA by 59% when P511 cells were treated although this decrease was not drug dose dependent. Photofrin (1 microg/ml, 2 h) followed by light (25 J/cm2) reduced CLA by 35% in a drug dose dependent manner. Longer incubation times led to reduced CLA inhibition (10% for 3 h incubation) after Photofrin followed by light. The light dose (25, 37, 50 J/cm2) did not influence CLA for a given Photofrin concentration. Photofrin alone (0.5 microg/ml, followed by light (25 J/cm2 for 2 h) reduced CLA respectively by 8 and 45% only when lymphocytes were treated. When lymphocytes and P511 cells were treated with Photofrin alone or followed by light (25 J/cm2), CLA was also reduced (by 19 and 41% respectively). This type of damage can be evaluated in terms of antigen expression on the target cells, on the lymphocyte T receptor, on H-2 (histocompatibility major complex), or on lymphocyte activity after PDT.

Stimulation of the recruitment of epidermal Langerhans cells by splenopentin

Splenopentin (SP-5: Arg-Lys-Glu-Val-Tyr), a pentapeptide corresponding to the residues 32-36 of the splenic hormone splenin, increases dose-dependently the number of bone marrow colonies (M and GM colonies). Therefore, we tested the stimulatory effect of SP-5 on the recruitment of epidermal Langerhans cells in skin deprived of these cells. A high dose of cyclophosphamide or dexamethasone led to a drastic decrease of LC density in murine skin with slow and incomplete restoration. SP-5 accelerated Langerhans cell recruitment and led to pretreatment levels of Langerhans cell density in the skin. These results indicate that SP-5 may possibly be used to treat disorders (e.g., HIV infection) where impaired Langerhans cell density and function can lead to secondary cutaneous infections.

Studies on the immunomodulatory effects of anthracycline antibiotics in mice: effects on immune responses and graft immunogenicity

The immunomodulatory effects of adriamycin, a clinically used tumor antibiotic, were studied. A 5-day course of adriamycin therapy in mice led to a suppression of the primary but not of the secondary humoral response to sheep erythrocytes without significant alterations in peripheral blood leukocyte subsets or lymphocyte subpopulations in the spleen. The delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to ovalbumin or alloantigens was not inhibited. Adriamycin-treated spleen cells were unable to stimulate an allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction, which shows that antigen presentation is inhibited by this drug. Adriamycin-treated murine skin grafts show a prolonged survival after allotransplantation despite their unimpaired ability to induce DTH. The possible cellular mechanisms of these effects and clinical relevance of adriamycin are discussed.

Effect of photodynamic therapy on anti-tumor immune defenses: comparison of the photosensitizers hematoporphyrin derivative and chloro-aluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine

The effects of the two photosensitizers chloroaluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine (ClAlSPc) and hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) on the functional activities of macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells, two immunocyte populations implicated in the control of tumor development and spread, have been investigated. Murine peritoneal macrophages treated in vivo with ClAlSPc or HpD at 10 mg/kg body weight showed no impairment of Fc-mediated phagocytic capacity and only minor disturbances of in vitro tumoricidal/tumoristatic function. The NK cell activity of splenocytes obtained from photosensitizer-treated mice, assayed 24 or 48 h after i.v. injection of ClAlSPc or HpD at 10 mg/kg was unaffected compared to controls. However significant inhibition of NK activity was observed when splenocytes obtained from mice with or without subcutaneous Colo 26 tumors, treated with ClAlSPc plus laser therapy (675 nm) were used as effector cells. The results show that impairment of some anti-tumor activity can be observed in phthalocyanine treated or phthalocyanine + laser-treated animals but this relatively minor impairment may augur well for the use of systemic phthalocyanine administration in photodynamic therapy.

Inhibition of HLA-DR antigen expression and of the allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction by photochemical treatment

Treatment of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with UVB light, the photosensitizing system 8-methoxypsoralen plus UVA light (PUVA), or hematoporphyrin derivative plus visible light leads to an inhibition of their stimulatory capacity in an allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction despite unaltered expression of HLA-DR antigens when tested immediately after irradiation. However, HLA-DR positive cells disappear among mononuclear cells in the interval between 4 and 8 h after treatment with either UVB, PUVA, hematoporphyrin derivative and light, or heating to 45 degrees C. The expression of HLA-DQ, but not HLA-A,B,C, antigens, was similarly affected by these treatments. The significance of these results is discussed.