Has immunoglobulin come to a sticky end?

A rationalized set of default postulates that permit a coherent description of the immune system amenable to computer modeling

This discussion delineates and rationalizes a set of postulates that permit a coherent understanding of immune function. Although analytical tools such as mathematics and computer modeling have become very popular, simulation and data mining in the absence of a conceptual framework cannot increase understanding. The goal of this essay is to provide the foundation for a discussion that has as its goal the formulation of an agreed upon set of default postulates. Such a set is required to guide the algorithms needed to analyze complex immune behavior.

A hypothesis accounting for the paradoxical expression of the D gene segment in the BCR and the TCR

The D gene segment expressed in both the TCR and the BCR has a challenging behavior that begs interpretation. It is incorporated in three reading frames in the rearranged transcription unit but is expressed in antigen-selected cells in a preferred frame. Why was it so important to waste 2/3 of newborn cells? The hypothesis is presented that the D region is framework playing a role in both the TCR and the BCR by determining whether a signal is transmitted to the cell upon interaction with a cognate ligand. This assumption operates in determining haplotype exclusion for the BCR and in regulating the signaling orientation for the TCR. Relevant data as well as a definitive experiment challenging the validity of this hypothesis, are discussed.

On ‘Credo 2004’ as Viewed Under the ‘Development-Context’ Model of Colin Anderson

In analysing the Zinkernagel and Hengartner's 'Credo 2004,' Anderson introduces his 'development-context model' for the immunity-tolerance discrimination. He compares this model with the 'geographical model of Credo 2004' and our 'time-based two-signal model'. The discussion here deals with the advantages and limitations of the Anderson model considered largely at the level of principle. A meaningful discussion requires that we agree on the principle which separates the pathway of the effector output into two decision steps, the sorting of the repertoire and the regulation of effector class. The mechanism for the sorting of the repertoire is what might be referred to as the Self-Nonself discrimination. The black box approach, antigen-in, effector response-out, is what is referred to as the immunity-tolerance discrimination which includes the sorting of the repertoire. If this point of principle is accepted then we are left with a 'time-based two signal default model'.

What are the commonalities governing the behavior of humoral immune recognitive repertoires?

The humoral repertoire of immune systems is large, random and somatically selected. It is derived from a germline selected repertoire by a variety of diversification mechanisms, complementation of subunits, mutation and gene conversion. However derived, the end-product must be able to recognize and rid a vast variety of pathogens. This is accomplished by viewing antigens as combinatorials of epitopes, an astuce that permits a small repertoire to respond sufficiently rapidly to a vast antigenic universe. A somatically generated repertoire, however, requires a solution to two problems. First, a somatic mechanism for a self-nonself discrimination has to be put in place. Second, the repertoire has to be coupled to the effector mechanisms in a coherent fashion. The rules governing these two mechanisms are species-independent and delineate the parameters of all immune repertoires, whatever the somatic mechanism used to generate them.

A commentary on the Zinkernagel-Hengartner 'Credo 2004'

In 'Credo 2004', Zinkernagel and Hengartner give us a food-for-thought analysis of immune responsiveness based on a 'pragmatic and empiric point of view.' The Credo 2004 postulates derived by inductive extrapolation from observation to generalization do not satisfactorily account for immune behaviour because they lack a conceptualization as illustrated here. Nevertheless, Credo 2004 is certainly valuable in a limited framework because it is based on the most likely of assumptions namely that the immune system was evolutionarily selected to protect against infectious agents, and therefore the study of pathogens will most accurately reveal how the immune system responds normally to protect. After reformulating them, the postulates of Credo 2004 are analysed with respect to their generality.

Whither T-suppressors: if they didn’t exist would we have to invent them?

Arriving at an understanding of the role of suppressor T-cells (regulatory T-cells, CD4(+)CD25+) depends on whether their functional repertoire is somatically selected to be anti-Self or anti-Nonself. Immunologists are ambivalent; often publications espousing opposite views share an author. Here the arguments are detailed that the suppressor repertoire is not somatically selected to be anti-Self, but rather it is anti-Nonself. Therefore, suppression cannot regulate the Self-Nonself discrimination; its function is to regulate the magnitude and class of the anti-Nonself effector response.

If the immune repertoire evolved to be large, random, and somatically generated, then

The evolution of the somatically generated random combining site repertoire of the "adaptive" immune system depended on the concurrent appearance of a somatic process that sorted the repertoire into anti-self and anti-nonself. Unlike the germline-selected sorting process characteristic of "innate" defense mechanisms, somatic sorting of the repertoire requires that antigens be classified based on their behavior, not on their physical or chemical properties. As specific recognitive combining sites (paratopes) define antigenic determinants (epitopes), the sorting of the repertoire operates epitope-by-epitope. By contrast, the coupling of the paratope to effector function must operate antigen-by-antigen because the response to each epitope on the antigen must be in the same effector class (i.e., coherent). This distinction resolves a long standing debate and provides a basis for analyzing the various models.

Some thoughts on the response to antigens that are effector T-helper independent ('thymus independence')

The Self-Non-Self discrimination is germline-selected for defence mechanisms ('innate immune systems') whereas it is somatically learned for immune systems ('adaptive immune systems'). It is proposed that immune system evolved from defence mechanisms by adding large recognitive repertoires that, by aggregating with antigens, were able to trigger the already existent effector functions of defence mechanisms. Thus today there are two pathways to triggering each class of effector function (macrophage opsonization, complement lysis or natural killer/-natural cytotoxic cell activity). The antigen-antibody complex and the T-cell antigen-receptor interaction trigger the immune pathway: the receptors of the defence mechanism trigger the 'alternate' or 'innate' pathway. The evolutionary selection pressure on defence mechanisms was to increase the size of the recognitive repertoire, which in turn, necessitated the emergence of a somatically learned Self-Non-Self discrimination. By contrast with defence mechanisms that are triggered effector T-helper (eTh) independently by polymers (Signal[3]), immune systems can be activated by monomers, a pathway that requires associative recognition of monomer and the reading of two Signals, Signal[1] resulting from the binding of an epitope to the antigen-receptor complex, Signal[2] delivered by an eTh cell. The evolving immune system hijacked part of this eTh-independent pathway (Signal[3]) into which Signal ([1] + [2]) merged. A model of these relationships is proposed.

In vivo study of mIgM and mIgD cross-linking on murine B cells

In this study, we have analysed in mice the effects on the immune response of in vivo treatment with different rat monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) against IgM and IgD. Although the effects of IgD cross-linking have been studied already, no attempt has been made to characterize the effects of in vivo IgM crosslinking, probably because of the higher IgM serum levels compared to IgD. We have used a panel of nine monoclonal rat anti-mouse IgM and three anti-IgD antibodies and we have characterized their isotypes, avidities, immunoglobulin (Ig) cross-linking and internalization abilities. Our results show that injection of mice with some rat MoAb against IgM led to an important decrease of IgM serum level and internalization of membrane IgM (mIgM) on almost all B cells. Similarly, treatment with a high-avidity anti-IgD antibody induced disapperance of mIgD on B cells. Treatment with rat MoAb against IgM or IgD led to a synthesis of specific antibodies and there was a direct relationship between the Ig internalization abilities of rat MoAb and the induction of specific antibody production. Finally, treatment with a high-avidity rat MoAb against IgD induced a polyclonal IgE and IgG1 secretion. The significance of these results on mIg receptor functions is discussed.

A theory of the ontogeny of the chicken humoral immune system: the consequences of diversification by gene hyperconversion and its extension to rabbit

The immune system's repertoire is generated in two stages: Stage I results in a small size high copy number repertoire that is diversified by "mutation" to result in a large size low copy number repertoire referred to as Stage II. The Stage I or high copy number repertoire is derived from information stored directly in the genome by two mechanisms. (a) The copy-cassette mechanism: the Ig-locus has one rearrangeable V gene segment which acts as recipient for controlled gene conversion in cis from a set of donor V gene segments that results in a family of subunits, L and H. This is illustrated by the avian systems. (b) The cassette-exchange mechanism: the Ig-locus has many rearrangeable V gene segments which are fused into transcription units, the products of which are a family of L and H subunits identical in function to those resulting from the copy-cassette mechanism. This is illustrated by the murine or human systems. It is possible for a species to use both mechanisms, copy-cassette at one Ig locus and cassette-exchange at the other Ig locus. This seems to obtain in the rabbit system. Further, it is possible to encode the high copy number repertoire directly in the genome as tandemly repeated rearranged transcription units as one sees in shark (a genomic analogue of the cassette-exchange mechanism). We have discussed here and elsewhere (Cohn and Langman, 1990) the consequences of these mechanisms for haplotype exclusion and functional responsiveness to antigen. The Stage I or high copy number repertoire generated by any of the above mechanisms is now a substrate for "mutation" which generates the low copy number or Stage II repertoire. These three species are compared in table V. The high copy number repertoire is small but the response to any antigen that it recognizes is rapid. The low copy number repertoire is large but responsiveness to any antigen it recognizes is slow. Cooperativity between the two repertoires optimizes the overall responsiveness with respect to rapidity of response and range of responsiveness. The use of a copy-cassette mechanism requires that the phi B cell undergoing gene conversion have a single rearranged L- and H-chain haplotype (L+/oH+/o). The reason is that conversion can correct an aberrantly rearranged transcription unit and generate an unacceptable level of doubles. In order to have one chromosome functionally rearranged and the homologue in the germline configuration, a selection mechanism is required.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Membrane-incorporated immunoglobulin receptors increase the antigen-presenting ability of B cells

Monoclonal antibodies specific for ovalbumin were conjugated to palmitate and inserted into the membrane of normal spleen B cells. Their presence in the membrane, as well as their ability to bind ovalbumin, was established by immunofluorescence. The so called anti-ovalbumin-'decorated' B cells were tested for their ability to act as antigen-presenting cells for ovalbumin-specific I-Ad-restricted T-cell hybridomas. It was found that the antibody-decorated B cells presented antigen more efficiently than non-decorated B cells.