Solifenacin in the management of the overactive bladder syndrome

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which causes lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), is a common diagnosis among the ageing male population with increasing prevalence. Many risks factors, both modifiable and non-modifiable, can increase the risk of development and progression of BPH and LUTS. The symptoms can be obstructive (resulting in urinary hesitancy, weak stream, straining or prolonged voiding) or irritative (resulting in increased urinary frequency and urgency, nocturia, urge incontinence and reduced voiding volumes), or can affect the patient after micturition (for example, postvoid dribble or incomplete emptying). BPH occurs when both stromal and epithelial cells of the prostate in the transitional zone proliferate by processes that are thought to be influenced by inflammation and sex hormones, causing prostate enlargement. Patients with LUTS undergo several key diagnostic investigations before being diagnosed with BPH. Treatment options for men with BPH start at watchful waiting and progress through medical to surgical interventions. For the majority of patients, the starting point on the treatment pathway will be dictated by their symptoms and degree of bother.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of solifenacin

The succinate salt of solifenacin, a tertiary amine with anticholinergic properties, is used for symptomatic treatment of overactive bladder. Solifenacin peak plasma concentrations of 24.0 and 40.6 ng/mL are reached 3-8 hours after long-term oral administration of a 5 or 10 mg solifenacin dose, respectively. Studies in healthy adults have shown that the drug has high absolute bioavailability of about 90%, which does not decrease with concomitant food intake. Solifenacin has an apparent volume of distribution of 600 L, is 93-96% plasma protein bound, and probably crosses the blood-brain barrier. Solifenacin is eliminated mainly through hepatic metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, with about only 7% (3-13%) of the dose being excreted unchanged in the urine. Solifenacin metabolites are unlikely to contribute to clinical solifenacin effects. In healthy adults, total clearance of solifenacin amounts to 7-14 L/h. The terminal elimination half-life ranges from 33 to 85 hours, permitting once-daily administration. Urinary excretion plays a minor role in the elimination of solifenacin, resulting in renal clearance of 0.67-1.51 L/h. Solifenacin does not influence the activity of CYP1A1/2, 2C9, 2D6 and 3A4, and shows a weak inhibitory potential for CYP2C19 and P-glycoprotein in vitro; however, clinical drug-drug interactions with CYP2C19 and P-glycoprotein substrates are very unlikely. Exposure to solifenacin is increased about 1.2-fold in elderly subjects and about 2-fold in subjects with moderate hepatic and severe renal impairment, as well as by coadministration of the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole 200 mg/day. The full therapeutic effects of solifenacin occur after 2-4 weeks of treatment and are maintained upon long-term therapy. Although solifenacin pharmacokinetics display linearity at doses of 5-40 mg, no obvious dose dependency was observed in efficacy and tolerability studies. The efficacy of solifenacin (5 or 10 mg/day) is at least equal to that of extended-release (ER) tolterodine (4 mg/day) in reducing the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours and urgency episodes, and in increasing the volume voided per micturition. Solifenacin (5 mg/day) appears to be superior to ER tolterodine (4 mg/day) in reducing incontinence episodes (mean -1.30 vs -0.90, p = 0.018) and is superior to propiverine (20 mg/day) at the dose of 10 mg/day in reducing urgency (-2.30 vs -2.78, p = 0.012) and nocturia episodes. Based on withdrawal rates due to adverse effects during the 52-week treatment period, solifenacin appears to have better tolerability than immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin 10-15 mg/day and IR tolterodine 4 mg/day. With regard to the pharmacokinetics of solifenacin, and for safety reasons, doses exceeding 5 mg/day are not recommended for patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7-9), patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) and subjects undergoing concomitant therapy with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of [14C]Imidafenacin, a New Compound for Treatment of Overactive Bladder, After Oral Administration to Healthy Male Subjects

The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of imidafenacin [KRP-197/ONO-8025, 4-(2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-2,2-diphenylbutanamide], a new antimuscarinic drug developed for treatment of overactive bladder, were assessed in six healthy male subjects after a single oral administration of 0.25 mg of [(14)C]imidafenacin (approximately 46 microCi). The highest radioactivity in the plasma was observed at 1.5 h after administration. The apparent terminal elimination half-life of the total radioactivity was 72 h. Approximately 65.6 and 29.4% of the administered radioactivity were recovered in the urine and feces, respectively, within 192 h after administration. The metabolite profiling by high-performance liquid chromatography-radiodetector and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry demonstrated that the main component of radioactivity was unchanged imidafenacin in the 2-h plasma. The N-glucuronide conjugate (M-9) was found as the major metabolite and the oxidized form of the 2-methylimidazole moiety (M-2) and the ring-cleavage form (M-4) were detected as the minor metabolites in the 2-h plasma, but M-4 was found to be the main component in the 12-h plasma. Unchanged imidafenacin, M-9, M-2, and other oxidized metabolites were excreted in the urine, but the unchanged imidafenacin and M-9 were not found in the feces. Two unique metabolites were found in the urine and feces, which were identified as the interchangeable cis- and trans-isomers of 4,5-dihydrodiol forms of the 2-methylimidazole moiety. These findings indicate that imidafenacin is rapidly and well absorbed (at least 65% of dose recovered in urine) after oral administration, circulates in human plasma as the unchanged form, its glucuronide, and other metabolites, and is then excreted in urine and feces as the oxidized metabolites of 2-methylimidazole moiety.

Development and validation of bioanalytical methods for Imidafenacin (KRP-197/ONO-8025) and its metabolites in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Imidafenacin (KRP-197/ONO-8025, IM), 4-(2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-2,2-diphenylbutanamide, is a new antimuscarinic agent currently under application for the indication of treatment of overactive bladder in Japan. We developed and validated the sensitive and selective bioanalytical methods for the extremely low levels of IM and its metabolite, M-2 (Method 1), M-4 (Method 2) and M-9 (Method 3) in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In each method, plasma sample was extracted by solid phase extraction, separated on a semi-micro high performance liquid chromatography column and detected by tandem mass spectrometer with an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization or ionspray interface. Selected reaction monitoring mode was used for quantification. Each method was found to have acceptable accuracy, precision, stability, selectivity and linearity over the concentration range of 10-500 pg/mL for IM and M-2, 10-1000 pg/mL for M-4 and 50-5000 pg/mL for M-9. Using these analytical methods, concentration profiles of IM and its metabolites in human plasma were successfully determined even in the low pg/mL levels after oral administration of IM at the therapeutic dosage of 0.1 mg.

“Phenotypic” pharmacology: The influence of cellular environment on G protein-coupled receptor antagonist and inverse agonist pharmacology

A central dogma of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pharmacology has been the concept that unlike agonists, antagonist ligands display equivalent affinities for a given receptor, regardless of the cellular environment in which the affinity is assayed. Indeed, the widespread use of antagonist pharmacology in the classification of receptor expression profiles in vivo has relied upon this 'antagonist assumption'. However, emerging evidence suggests that the same gene-product may exhibit different antagonist pharmacological profiles, depending upon the cellular context in which it is expressed-so-called 'phenotypic' profiles. In this commentary, we review the evidence relating to some specific examples, focusing on adrenergic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor systems, where GPCR antagonist/inverse agonist pharmacology has been demonstrated to be cell- or tissue-dependent, before going on to examine some of the ways in which the cellular environment might modulate receptor pharmacology. In the majority of cases, the cellular factors responsible for generating phenotypic profiles are unknown, but there is substantial evidence that factors, including post-transcriptional modifications, receptor oligomerization and constitutive receptor activity, can influence GPCR pharmacology and these concepts are discussed in relation to antagonist phenotypic profiles. A better molecular understanding of the impact of cell background on GPCR antagonist pharmacology is likely to provide previously unrealized opportunities to achieve greater specificity in new drug discovery candidates.

Solifenacin provides effective antimuscarinic therapy for the complete management of overactive bladder

Solifenacin is an antimuscarinic agent, administered once daily, which has been newly approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). Solifenacin administered at 5- and 10-mg once-daily doses shows efficacy for all the symptoms of OAB in both 'wet' and 'dry' patients, including improvements in patient quality of life and satisfaction. These improvements are observed as early as week 2 of treatment and are maintained over 12-week and 1-year time periods, without being compromised by the age or gender of the patient. Solifenacin demonstrates a favourable tolerability profile, with mild dry mouth as the most common adverse event associated with its use, both at the 5- and 10-mg doses; this allows for flexibility in the dosing regimen, in which physicians can administer solifenacin 5 mg, with the option to safely increase the dose to 10 mg if necessary based on the severity of patient's symptoms. The favourable efficacy and safety profile of solifenacin, coupled with its dose flexibility, are consistent with solifenacin being a convenient treatment option for patients with OAB.