Management of the elderly patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Defining Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Older Adults With Cancer: A Scoping Literature Review

PURPOSE

The terms undertreatment and overtreatment are often used to describe inappropriate management of older adults with cancer. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of the literature to clarify the meanings behind the use of the terms.

METHODS

We searched PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) for titles and abstracts that included the terms undertreatment or overtreatment with regard to older adults with cancer. We included all types of articles, cancer types, and treatments. Definitions of undertreatment and overtreatment were extracted, and categories underlying these definitions were derived through qualitative analysis. Within a random subset of articles, C.D. and K.P.L. independently performed this analysis to determine final categories and then independently assigned these categories to assess inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

Articles using the terms undertreatment (n = 236), overtreatment (n = 71), or both (n = 51) met criteria for inclusion in our review (n = 256). Only 14 articles (5.5%) explicitly provided formal definitions; for the remaining, we inferred the implicit definitions from the terms' surrounding context. There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.81) between C.D. and K.P.L. in independently assigning categories of definitions within a random subset of 50 articles. Undertreatment most commonly implied less than recommended therapy (148; 62.7%) or less than recommended therapy associated with worse outcomes (88; 37.3%). Overtreatment most commonly implied intensive treatment of an older adult in whom the harms of treatment outweigh the benefits (38; 53.5%) or intensive treatment of a cancer not expected to affect an older adult in his/her remaining lifetime (33; 46.5%).

CONCLUSION

Undertreatment and overtreatment of older adults with cancer are imprecisely defined concepts. We propose new, more rigorous definitions that account for both oncologic factors and geriatric domains.

Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel for Completely Resected NSCLC

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus vinorelbine is the standard regimen for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, CDDP elicits severe toxic effects, including emesis, neurotoxicity, and renal damage; carboplatin (CBDCA) may be a feasible alternative for CDDP-unfit patients. CBDCA plus paclitaxel (PTX) adjuvant chemotherapy showed a survival benefit for patients with stage IB tumors >4 cm in size, while CBDCA plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-PTX showed greater efficacy and lower neurotoxicity than CBDCA plus PTX in advanced NSCLC. Here, we investigated the feasibility of using CBDCA plus nab-PTX as adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with completely resected stage II or III NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and adequate kidney function, received four cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with CBDCA (AUC=5 mg/mL/min, on day 1) and nab-PTX (100 mg/m², on days 1, 8, and 15) administered every 4 weeks within 8 weeks after surgery. The study was designed as a prospective, single-center, Phase II study. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of chemotherapy; secondary endpoints were two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and safety. The expected completion rate was 80%, with a 50% lower limit.

Results

Of 21 enrolled patients, 18 (85.7%) were CDDP-unfit owing to age (≥75 years old [n=11, 52.4%]) or mild renal impairment (n=7, 33.3%). Nineteen of the 21 enrolled patients were assigned to the intervention. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=15, 78.9%) and anemia (n=3, 15.8%). The completion rate for the four cycles was 63.2% (95% CI, 38.4–83.7). Two-year RFS was 56.8% (95% CI, 29.7–76.9).

Conclusion

The completion rate for CBDCA plus nab-PTX as adjuvant chemotherapy for CDDP-unfit NSCLC patients did not reach treatment feasibility. Further dose modifications may be required in future studies.

Pemetrexed plus carboplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curative resected non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy provided a significant advantage in the overall survival (OS) of patients with stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the compliance and toxicity in cisplatin-based treatment were not always satisfactory. Pemetrexed plus carboplatin (PC) had better chemotherapy compliance and efficiency in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of PC as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-squamous NSCLC.

METHODS

Eighty-two eligible non-squamous NSCLC patients operated on with pathological stage II or IIIA were enrolled in this trial. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated between one and four weeks after surgery, and consisted of four cycles of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC = 5) every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the compliance of the regimen and the second endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Patient demographics were median age 58 years (range 32 to 78) and gender ratio 68.3% male/31.7% female. Forty-eight (58.5%) of the patients were at stage II, and the other thirty-four (41.5%) patients were at stage IIIA. Seventy patients (85.4%) received four cycles of therapy over a 12-week period. Reasons for discontinuing therapy included: patient's refusal (n = 10); severe adverse events (n = 1); and surgical complications (n = 1). The primary grade 3 to 4 adverse reaction was hematologic toxicity: neutropenia (13.4%); leucopenia (7.3%); anemia (3.7%); and thrombocytopenia (2.4%). Non-hematological adverse events were mild. No treatment related deaths were observed. Median DFS for stage II and IIIA patients were 38.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 28.1 to 47.9 months) and 21.0 months (95%CI: 13.7 to 28.3 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant PC chemotherapy was an acceptable regimen in resected non-squamous NSCLC patients.

The International Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends

This review presents the latest available international data for lung cancer incidence, mortality and survival, emphasizing the established causal relationship between smoking and lung cancer. In 2002, it was estimated that 1.35 million people throughout the world were diagnosed with lung cancer, and 1.18 million died of lung cancer-more than for any other type of cancer. There are some key differences in the epidemiology of lung cancer between more developed and less developed countries. In more developed countries, incidence and mortality rates are generally declining among males and are starting to plateau for females, reflecting previous trends in smoking prevalence. In contrast, there are some populations in less developed countries where increasing lung cancer rates are predicted to continue, due to endemic use of tobacco. A higher proportion of lung cancer cases are attributable to nonsmoking causes within less developed countries, particularly among women. Worldwide, the majority of lung cancer patients are diagnosed after the disease has progressed to a more advanced stage. Despite advances in chemotherapy, prognosis for lung cancer patients remains poor, with 5-year relative survival less than 14% among males and less than 18% among females in most countries. Given the increasing incidence of lung cancer in less developed countries and the current lack of effective treatment for advanced lung cancers, these results highlight the need for ongoing global tobacco reform to reduce the international burden of lung cancer.

Lung cancer in New Zealand: patterns of secondary care and implications for survival

INTRODUCTION

The survival of patients with lung cancer in New Zealand is poor compared with Australia and the United States. To determine whether these poorer outcomes were related to secondary care management or to other factors, we documented stage of disease, comorbidities, and initial secondary care management for patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 2004, in Auckland and Northland (New Zealand). These data were compared with international data.

METHODS

Cases were identified from regional databases and the New Zealand Cancer Registry. Patient, tumor, and management details were collected from clinical records.

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty-five eligible cases were identified: 55% were male, the median age was 69 years, 9% were never-smokers, 81% had documented comorbidity, and 32% belonged to the most deprived socioeconomic quintile. Histopathology was non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 70%, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 13%, 2% other types, and 15% clinicoradiological diagnoses. At presentation, 70% of NSCLC cases had locally advanced/metastatic disease, and 65% of SCLC cases had extensive disease. Overall, 70% of cases were referred to an anticancer service, and 50% received initial anticancer treatment. Potentially curative treatment was received by 20% of cases: 56% stage I/II, 10% stage III NSCLC, and 58% limited-stage SCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort was characterized by high comorbidity and advanced disease. Although similar to the United Kingdom, initial treatment rates were low in comparison with Australia and the United States, despite similar stage distributions. Overall, 50% of patients, including 30% with early-stage disease, did not receive initial anticancer treatment. Low anticancer treatment rates may contribute to poorer survival outcomes in New Zealand.

Single-Agent Pemetrexed or Sequential Pemetrexed/Gemcitabine as Front-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients or Patients Ineligible for Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Trial

INTRODUCTION

This randomized phase II trial evaluated single-agent pemetrexed or sequential pemetrexed/gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were elderly (> or = 70 years) or younger than 70 years and ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 received either 500 mg/m2 of pemetrexed (day 1, every 3 weeks) for eight cycles, or the same dosage of pemetrexed for cycles 1 and 2 and then 1200 mg/m2 of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) for cycles 3 and 4 (repeated once for a total of eight cycles). All patients were given vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation.

RESULTS

From July 2003 to July 2004, 87 patients (44 pemetrexed; 43 pemetrexed/gemcitabine) received treatment. The median time to progression was 4.5 (95% confidence interval: 3.0-9.3) and 4.1 months (95% confidence interval: 1.7-5.8) for the pemetrexed and pemetrexed/gemcitabine arms, respectively, and the median progression-free survival time was 3.3 months for both arms. Tumor response rates for the pemetrexed and pemetrexed/gemcitabine arms were 4.5% and 11.6%, respectively. The median overall survival time was 4.7 months for the pemetrexed arm and 5.4 months for the pemetrexed/gemcitabine arm, with respective 1-year survival rates of 28.5% and 28.1%. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity consisted of neutropenia (4.5% pemetrexed; 2.3% pemetrexed/gemcitabine), febrile neutropenia (4.5% pemetrexed; 4.7% pemetrexed/gemcitabine), thrombocytopenia (4.5% pemetrexed; 7.0% pemetrexed/gemcitabine), and anemia (6.8% pemetrexed; 4.7% pemetrexed/gemcitabine). No grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities exceeded 4.7% in either arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent pemetrexed and sequential pemetrexed/gemcitabine have shown moderate activity and are well tolerated as first-line treatments for advanced NSCLC in elderly patients or patients unsuitable for platinum-based combination chemotherapy.