Evaluation and recommendations of the oral health, oral function, and orofacial aesthetics-related measures of the ICHOM Standard Set for Cleft Lip and Palate

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of outcome measures for the orofacial domain included in the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Standard Set for Cleft Lip and Palate (ICHOM-SCS). In this multicentre study involving two cleft centres, suggestions to optimize the type and timing of outcome measures were made based on data and clinical experience. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (CLEFT-Q Jaw, Teeth, Eating/Drinking; Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Oral Symptoms Scale (COHIP-OSS)) and clinical outcome measures (caries experience and dental occlusion) data were collected retrospectively for age 5, 8, 10, 12, 19, and 22 years. The data were categorized by cleft type and analysed within and between age groups using Spearman correlation, the distribution of responses per item, a two-sample test for equality of proportions, and effect plots. Most correlations between PROMs and clinical outcome measures were weak (r < 0.5), suggesting PROMs and clinical outcome measures complement each other. The COHIP-OSS and CLEFT-Q Eating/Drinking barely detected problems in any patient category and are no longer recommended. A suitable alternative appears complex to find; outcomes of this study and the recent literature doubt an added value. Similar problems were found in the CLEFT-Q Jaw at time-point 12 years. Therefore, time-points 15 and 17 years are currently suggested.

Initial versus early switch to targeted therapy during first-line treatment among patients with biomarker-positive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVES

This study compared outcomes between patients with biomarker-positive advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) who initiated treatment with targeted therapy versus those who initiated chemotherapy-based treatment and switched to targeted therapy during the first ∼3 cycles (defined as the first 56 days) of first-line treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational study of patients with a/mNSCLC who received targeted therapy from a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database. Outcomes were compared between those who initiated targeted therapy versus those who switched from chemotherapy to a targeted agent. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method; Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for baseline covariates) were used to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 4,244 patients in this study, 3,107 (73.2%) initiated the first line with targeted therapy and 346 (8.2%) switched to targeted therapy. Patients who received initial targeted therapy were significantly more likely to be non-smokers, treated in an academic practice setting, and of slightly older age (all p < 0.05). Patients who received initial targeted therapy also had a significantly longer time to start of first-line treatment (35.8 vs 25.3 days, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for clinical outcomes between groups.

CONCLUSION

In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, there were no differences in the clinical outcomes observed among patients with a/mNSCLC in this study. This study found that initiating chemotherapy with an early switch to targeted therapy (within 56 days) of receiving biomarker positive results may be an acceptable strategy for a patient for whom immediate care is needed.

Results of an Open-label, Phase Ia/b Study of Pembrolizumab plus Olaratumab in Patients with Unresectable, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE

The study evaluated safety and efficacy of olaratumab + pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) with disease progression on standard treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation study followed by cohort expansion (olaratumab + pembrolizumab intravenous infusion). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

The majority of patients enrolled (n = 41) were female [phase Ia: 9 of 13, phase Ib/dose-expansion cohort (DEC), 17 of 28], aged < 65 years. In phases Ia and Ib, 13 and 26 patients received prior systemic therapy, respectively. Patients received olaratumab 15 mg/kg (phase Ia; cohort 1) or 20 mg/kg (phase Ia; cohort 2 and phase Ib) and pembrolizumab 200 mg (phase Ia/Ib). The median (Q1-Q3) duration of therapy (olaratumab) was 6.0 (3.0-11.9; cohort 1), 14.4 (12.4-20.9; cohort 2), and 14.0 (6.0-21.8) weeks (DEC). No dose-limiting toxicities and few grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAE; 15 mg/kg: 2 (increased lipase); 20 mg/kg: 1 (increased lipase), 1 (colitis), 2 (diarrhea), 3 (anemia)] were reported. Two TEAEs (increased lipase) were related to study discontinuations. Twenty-one patients reported mild (grade ≤ 2) TEAEs [phase Ia, disease control rate (DCR):14.3% (1/7, cohort 1); 66.7% (4/6, cohort 2); no responses were reported; phase Ib, DCR: 53.6% (15/28); objective response rate: 21.4% (6/28; RECIST and irRECIST criteria)]. No response was observed in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Antitumor activity was observed in some patients in DEC, and combination was well tolerated with manageable safety profile. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and mechanistic impact of platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitors with immune checkpoint modulator coadministration.

Biomarker Testing, Treatment, and Outcomes in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Real-World Database

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the impact of up-front biomarker testing on long-term outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC). This study compared overall survival (OS) by biomarker testing status and by receipt of guideline-concordant therapy in a large real-world cohort of patients with a/mNSCLC in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study used an a/mNSCLC database derived from real-world electronic healthcare records. Patients diagnosed with nonsquamous a/mNSCLC who initiated first-line therapy on or after January 1, 2015, were included. We describe the testing of patients for actionable biomarkers and whether they subsequently received guideline-recommended first-line treatment. OS was defined as the number of months from the initiation of first-line therapy to the date of death or end of follow-up, and was described using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling was conducted to compare OS between groups adjusting for baseline covariates; adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 21,572 patients with a median age of 69 years (IQR, 61-76 years) and follow-up of 9.5 months (IQR, 3.5-21.5 months) were included. Among patients in the database, 88% had a record of receiving testing for at least 1 biomarker at any time, and 69% of these patients received testing before or at the start of first-line treatment. The adjusted hazard of death was 30% higher in patients who never (vs ever) received biomarker testing in the database (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.24-1.37), and 12% higher in patients who did not receive (vs did receive) biomarker testing before or at the start of first-line treatment (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16). The adjusted hazard of death was 25% higher in patients who did not receive guideline-concordant first-line treatment (vs those who did) after having a biomarker-positive disease (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that receipt of first-line treatment that is concordant with biomarker testing results and treatment guidelines is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with a/mNSCLC in the United States.

External control cohorts for the single-arm LIBRETTO-001 trial of selpercatinib in RET+ non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Data for selpercatinib [a selective REarranged during Transfection (RET) inhibitor] from a single-arm trial (LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128) in RET-fusion-positive advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were used in combination with external data sources to estimate comparative efficacy [objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS)] in first- and second-line treatment settings.

Methods

Patient-level data were obtained from a de-identified real-world database. Patients diagnosed with advanced/metastatic NSCLC with no prior exposure to a RET inhibitor and one or more prior line of therapy were eligible. Additionally, individual patient-level data (IPD) were obtained from the pemetrexed + platinum arm of KEYNOTE-189 (NCT03950674, first line) and the docetaxel arm of REVEL (NCT01168973, post-progression). Patients were matched using entropy balancing, doubly robust method, and propensity score approaches. For patients with unknown/negative RET status, adjustment was made using a model fitted to IPD from a real-world database.

Results

In first-line unadjusted analyses of the real-world control, ORR was 87.2% for LIBRETTO-001 versus 66.7% for those with RET-positive NSCLC (P = 0.06). After adjustment for unknown RET status and other patient characteristics, selpercatinib remained significantly superior versus the real-world control for all outcomes (all P < 0.001 except unadjusted RET-fusion-positive cohort). Similarly, outcomes were significantly improved versus clinical trial controls (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Findings suggest improvement in outcomes associated with selpercatinib treatment versus the multiple external control cohorts, but should be interpreted with caution. Data were limited by the rarity of RET, lack of mature OS data, and uncertainty from assumptions to create control arms from external data.

•

Single-arm trials are limited by the lack of a comparison arm, and external controls are needed.

•

Multiple methodological approaches with various external control arms evaluated the comparative efficacy of selpercatinib.

•

Findings suggest that selpercatinib is associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes versus standard therapies.

•

Results should be considered exploratory and hypothesis generating due to the limitations of this study.

Overall Survival and Safety With Pemetrexed/Platinum ± Anti-VEGF Followed by Pemetrexed ± Anti-VEGF Maintenance in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Studies

BACKGROUND

Before immune checkpoint blockade therapy, chemotherapy with pemetrexed maintenance was the standard of care for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC) and remains such where immunotherapy is not applicable. This pooled analysis aimed to characterize overall survival (OS) and safety of pemetrexed ± anti-VEGF maintenance, by treatment duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 4 randomized clinical trials (PARAMOUNT, PRONOUNCE, PointBreak, JVBL) of patients with NSQ-NSCLC receiving pemetrexed ± anti-VEGF maintenance therapy were pooled as 2 groups (Group A: pemetrexed-only maintenance, n = 486; and Group B: pemetrexed + anti-VEGF maintenance, n = 329). OS and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed in both groups by treatment duration.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between both groups. Median OS did not significantly differ between Group A (16.1 months) and Group B (18.4 months; hazard ratio: 1.17, P= .1417). A correlation between median OS and treatment duration was numerically stronger in Group A (r = 0.72) versus B (r = 0.62). Across treatment groups, TEAEs were largely grade 1 to 2 and, with few exceptions, did not increase with increased treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant OS difference between pemetrexed-only and pemetrexed ± anti-VEGF maintenance in patients with NSQ-NSCLC. Patients receiving pemetrexed + anti-VEGF experienced a slightly less favorable safety profile with more reported TEAEs compared to pemetrexed monotherapy. Pemetrexed ± anti-VEGF maintenance therapy may be considered in NSQ-NSCLC, based on an individualized patient approach, particularly where immunotherapy is not clinically indicated.

Abstract 442: Pemetrexed and platinum plus pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer by tumor burden at baseline: A post-hoc efficacy analysis of KEYNOTE-189

Background: Pemetrexed (pem) and platinum (plat) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) showed clinical improvement in metastatic nonsquamous (NSQ) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this analysis was to assess the clinical benefit of pem+plat+pembro in patients by tumor burden at baseline.

Methods: The intention-to-treat population was analysed. Patients were randomized pem+plat+pembro (n=410) or pem+plat+placebo (n=206). The data cut-off date was May 20, 2019. OS, PFS, PFS-2, and ORR were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox methods within subgroups identified by extent of distant metastasis (M1a vs. M1b), median number (≤3 vs. &gt;3) of organ systems with lesions, and severity score of patient-reported symptoms (below median vs. above median) at baseline. These subgroup analyses were also replicated within PD-L1 TPS subgroups (&lt;1%, 1-49%, ≥50%).

Results: A consistent benefit in OS, PFS, PFS-2 and ORR was observed in the pem+plat+pembro treatment arm, compared to the pem+plat+placebo arm, irrespective of staging (M1a vs. M1b), number (≤ 3 vs. 3) of organ systems with lesions and severity of patient-reported symptoms (Table 1). Results by PD-L1 expression in the subgroups were generally consistent regardless of the level of expression.

Conclusions: Pem+plat+pembro demonstrated consistent clinical benefit across all subgroups analysed regardless of baseline tumor burden. These results continue to support pem+plat+pembro as a standard of care in metastatic NSQ-NSCLC.

TABLE 1.OS, PFS, PFS-2, and ORR in subgroups by tumor burden at baselineTreatment armsNaOSPFSPFS-2ORRHRHRHROdds ratioM1aPembro1230.540.480.572.66Placebo53M1bPembro2850.580.510.504.21Placebo152≤ 3b organ systems with lesionsPembro2350.490.410.436.00Placebo118&gt; 3b organ systems with lesionsPembro1750.670.590.601.80Placebo88≤ medianc severity score of symptomsPembro1700.510.490.432.72Placebo82&gt; medianc severity score of symptomsPembro1870.600.480.554.04Placebo97a.There were 3 patients with missing data for M1a and M1bb.Median number of organ systems with lesions was 3. Lesions include the primary tumorc.Median score = 122.2, based on six questions from the patient-reported LC-13 instrument

Citation Format: Shirish Gadgeel, Jhanelle Grey, Maria Teresa Rizzo, Patrick Peterson, Jongseok Kim, Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu. Pemetrexed and platinum plus pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer by tumor burden at baseline: A post-hoc efficacy analysis of KEYNOTE-189 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 442.

Safety of pemetrexed plus platinum in combination with pembrolizumab for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A post hoc analysis of KEYNOTE-189

OBJECTIVES

This post hoc analysis assessed the safety of pemetrexed and platinum in combination with pembrolizumab, including time-to-onset and time-to-resolution of all-cause any-grade and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and renal AEs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient-level data from KEYNOTE-189 were analyzed in the all-subjects-as-treated population (pembrolizumab arm, n = 405; placebo arm, n = 202), and among patients who received ≥5 cycles of pemetrexed (pemetrexed/pembrolizumab/platinum arm, n = 310; pemetrexed/placebo/platinum arm, n = 135). All-cause AEs were selected based on ≥2 % incidence from previously reported KEYNOTE-189 data and included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, pneumonitis, and renal events. Descriptive statistics summarized all-cause AEs. Medians and interquartile ranges were used to examine time-to-onset and time-to-resolution. The data cutoff was November 8, 2017.

RESULTS

In both treatment arms, most non-hematologic (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and asthenia), and hematologic (febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia) grade ≥3 AEs with ≥2 % incidence had a median time-to-onset within the first 4 cycles, and a median time-to-resolution of within 2 weeks from onset. A small number of AEs had longer median time-to-onset (pneumonitis and fatigue) and median time-to-resolution (pneumonitis, fatigue, acute kidney injury, and anemia). Among patients who received ≥5 cycles of pemetrexed, the incidence of any-grade renal toxicity in the pemetrexed/pembrolizumab/platinum arm was 2.3 % in Cycles 1-4, 4.8 % in Cycles 5-8, 2.6 % in Cycles 9-12, and 2.5 % in Cycles ≥13; and, in the pemetrexed/placebo/platinum arm, 0.7 % in Cycles 1-4, 1.5 % in Cycles 5-8, 1.3 % in Cycles 9-12, and 2.0 % in Cycles ≥13.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed/pembrolizumab/platinum has manageable toxicity with longer duration of treatment. While the incidence of renal toxicity was slightly higher in the pembrolizumab combination as compared to pemetrexed, the incidence did not increase in later treatment cycles. These results support the safe use of the KEYNOTE-189 regimen in clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02578680 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging parameter mapping in the posterior horn of ex vivo human menisci

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between meniscus magnetic resonance (MR) relaxation parameters and meniscus degradation through quantitative imaging of ex vivo posterior horns of menisci from subjects with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

We sampled medial and lateral menisci from ten medial compartment knee OA patients (mean age 63 years) undergoing total knee replacement and from ten deceased donors (references, mean age 51 years). MR relaxation parameters T2*, T2 and T1 of the posterior horn were measured at a 9.4 T scanner. Comparisons were made between OA patients and references (with adjustment for age) as well as between medial and lateral menisci from the same knees.

RESULTS

Mean values (standard deviation) of mean T2* were 13 (3.8), 6.9 (2.3), 7.2 (1.9) and 7.2 (1.7) ms for the medial and lateral patient menisci and the medial and lateral reference menisci, respectively. Corresponding values were 17 (3.7), 9.0 (2.2), 12 (4) and 9.0 (1.3) ms for T2 and 1810 (150), 1630 (30), 1580 (90) and 1560 (50) ms for T1. All three relaxation times were significantly longer in medial OA menisci compared to the other groups. Among medial reference menisci, relaxation times (mainly T1) tended to increase with age.

CONCLUSIONS

MR relaxation times T2*, T2 and T1 in the posterior horn are longer in the medial menisci of patients with end-stage medial compartment knee OA compared to the corresponding lateral menisci and to reference menisci. The meniscus seems to undergo intrasubstance alterations related to both OA and ageing.

Randomized phase II study of the PDGFRα antibody olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin versus liposomal doxorubicin alone in patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Olaratumab is a platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα)-targeting monoclonal antibody blocking PDGFRα signaling. PDGFRα expression is associated with a more aggressive phenotype and poor ovarian cancer outcomes. This randomized, open label phase II study evaluated olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin compared with liposomal doxorubicin alone in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m², intravenous infusion) administered every 4 weeks with or without olaratumab (20 mg/kg, IV infusion) every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified based on prior response to platinum therapy (refractory vs resistant). The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were treated (62 olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin; 61 liposomal doxorubicin). Median PFS was 4.2 months for olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and 4.0 months for liposomal doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 1.043; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.698-1.558; p = 0.837). Median OS was 16.6 months and 16.2 months in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin arms, respectively (HR = 1.098; 95% CI 0.71-1.71). In the platinum-refractory subgroup, median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.6-9.2) and 3.7 months (95% CI 1.9-9.2) in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin (n = 15) and liposomal doxorubicin arms (n = 16), respectively (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.38-1.91). Overall, 59.7% (olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin) and 65.6% (liposomal doxorubicin) of patients reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events regardless of causality. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades) regardless of causality were fatigue related (61%), nausea (57%), and constipation (52%) with olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and nausea (64%), fatigue related (62%), and mucositis (46%) with liposomal doxorubicin.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of olaratumab to liposomal doxorubicin did not result in significant prolongation of PFS or OS in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00913835 ; registered June 2, 2009.

Pancreas volume and fat fraction in children with Type 1 diabetes

AIMS

People with Type 1 diabetes have smaller pancreases than healthy individuals. Several diseases causing pancreatic atrophy are associated with pancreatic steatosis, but pancreatic fat in Type 1 diabetes has not been measured. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare pancreas size and fat fraction in children with Type 1 diabetes and controls.

METHODS

The volume and fat fraction of the pancreases of 22 children with Type 1 diabetes and 29 controls were determined using magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Pancreas volume was 27% smaller in children with diabetes (median 34.9 cm(3) ) than in controls (47.8 cm(3) ; P < 0.001). Pancreas volume correlated positively with age in controls (P = 0.033), but not in children with diabetes (P = 0.649). Pancreas volume did not correlate with diabetes duration, but it did correlate positively with units of insulin/kg body weight/day (P = 0.048). A linear model of pancreas volume as influenced by age, body surface area and insulin units/kg body weight/day found that insulin dosage correlated with pancreas volume after controlling for both age and body surface area (P = 0.009). Pancreatic fat fraction was not significantly different between the two groups (1.34% vs. 1.57%; P = 0.891).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not indicate that pancreatic atrophy in Type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased pancreatic fat fraction, unlike some other diseases featuring reduced pancreatic volume. We speculate that our results may support the hypotheses that much of pancreatic atrophy in Type 1 diabetes occurs before the clinical onset of the disease and that exogenous insulin administration decelerates pancreatic atrophy after diabetes onset.

Real-Time Sexing of Chicken Embryos and Compatibility with in ovo Protocols

The chicken embryo is an established model system for studying early vertebrate development. One of the major advantages of this model is the facility to perform manipulations in ovo and then continue incubation and observe the effects on embryonic development. However, in common with other vertebrate models, there is a tendency to disregard the sex of the experimental chicken embryos, and this can lead to erroneous conclusions, a lack of reproducibility, and wasted efforts. That this neglect is untenable is emphasised by the recent demonstration that avian cells and tissues have an inherent sex identity and that male and female tissues respond differently to the same stimulus. These sexually dimorphic characteristics dictate that analyses and manipulations involving chicken embryos should always be performed using tissues/embryos of known sex. Current sexing protocols are unsuitable in many instances because of the time constraints imposed by most in ovo procedures. To address this lack, we have developed a real-time chicken sexing assay that is compatible with in ovo manipulations, reduces the number of embryos required, and conserves resources.

Patient-reported pain and other quality of life domains as prognostic factors for survival in a phase III clinical trial of patients with advanced breast cancer

Background

Patient-reported outcomes have been associated with survival in numerous studies across cancer types, including breast cancer. However, the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) have rarely been investigated in this regard in breast cancer.

Methods

Here we describe a post hoc analysis of the prognostic effect of baseline scores of these instruments on survival in a phase III trial of patients with advanced breast cancer who received gemcitabine plus paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone after anthracycline-based adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. The variables for this analysis were baseline BPI-SF “worst pain” and BPI-SF “pain interference” scores, and four RSCL subscales (each transformed to 0–100). Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used, the latter in the presence of 11 demographic/clinical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare survival for patients by BPI-SF or RSCL scores.

Results

Of 529 randomized patients, 286 provided BPI-SF data and 336 provided RSCL data at baseline. Univariate analyses identified BPI-SF worst pain and pain interference (both hazard ratios [HR], 1.07 for a 1-point increase; both p ≤ 0.0061) and three of four RSCL subscales [activity level, physical distress, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (HR, 0.86–0.91 for 10-point increase all p ≤ 0.0104)], to have significant prognostic effect for survival. BPI-SF worst pain (p = 0.0342) and RSCL activity level (p = 0.0004) were prognostic in the multivariate analysis. Median survival for patients categorized by BPI-SF worst pain score was 23.8 (n = 91), 17.9 (n = 94) and 14.6 (n = 94) months for scores 0, 1–4, and 5–10, respectively (log-rank p = 0.0065). Median survival was 23.8 and 14.6 months for patients (n = 330) with above- and below-median RSCL activity level scores respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Pretreatment BPI-SF worst pain and RSCL activity scores provide distinct prognostic information for survival in patients receiving paclitaxel or gemcitabine plus paclitaxel for advanced breast cancer even after controlling for multiple demographic and clinical factors.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00006459.

The Effect of Necitumumab in Combination with Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin on Tolerability and on Quality of Life: Results from the Phase 3 SQUIRE Trial

INTRODUCTION

Necitumumab, a second-generation, recombinant human immunoglobulin G1 epidermal growth factor receptor antibody in the phase 3 SQUIRE trial (NCT00981058), increased survival benefit for patients randomized to receive necitumumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin compared with those who received gemcitabine-cisplatin. Here we characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and tolerability results.

METHODS

A total of 1093 patients with stage IV squamous non-small cell lung cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive necitumumab (800 mg absolute dose intravenously [IV]) plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (gemcitabine = 1250 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8; cisplatin = 75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1) or gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (every 21 days) for up to six cycles. Patients receiving necitumumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin without disease progression continued necitumumab until progression. HRQoL was measured by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), and the European Quality of Life Five-Dimensions questionnaire. Efficacy and LCSS outcomes were analyzed using the baseline maximum severity score of the LCSS. Tolerability was measured in terms of exposure to the study treatment and adverse events. Hospitalization rates were collected.

RESULTS

Most patients in both study arms similarly maintained Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and comparable LCSS and European Quality of Life Five-Dimensions questionnaire assessments. Patients with a higher baseline LCSS had a greater survival benefit on the necitumumab arm. Chemotherapy exposure was similar in both treatment arms; 51% of patients on the necitumumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin arm continued on single-agent necitumumab. The most frequent grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (6.1% versus 7.9%) and thrombocytopenia (3.2% versus 4.3%) in the necitumumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin arms, respectively. Hospitalizations were slightly higher with necitumumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (36.4%) than with gemcitabine-cisplatin (34.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of necitumumab to gemcitabine-cisplatin was well tolerated, did not negatively affect HRQoL or toxicity, and particularly benefited patients with more severe baseline symptoms or lower HRQoL.

Anti-cytokine autoantibodies preceding onset of autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I features in early childhood

PURPOSE

Almost all patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome (APS)-I have high titer neutralizing autoantibodies to type I interferons (IFN), especially IFN-ω and IFN-α2, whatever their clinical features and onset-ages. About 90 % also have antibodies to interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-17F and/or IL-22; they correlate with the chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) that affects ~90 % of patients. Our aim was to explore how early the manifestations and endocrine and cytokine autoantibodies appear in young APS-I patients. That may hold clues to very early events in the autoimmunization process in these patients.

METHODS

Clinical investigations and autoantibody measurements in 13 APS-I patients sampled before age 7 years, and 3 pre-symptomatic siblings with AIRE-mutations in both alleles.

RESULTS

Antibody titers were already high against IFN-α2 and IFN-ω at age 6 months in one sibling-8 months before onset of APS-I-and also against IL-22 at 7 months in another (still unaffected at age 5 years). In 12 of the 13 APS-I patients, antibody levels were high against IFN-ω and/or IL-22 when first tested, but only modestly positive against IFN-ω in one patient who had only hypo-parathyroidism. Endocrine organ-specific antibodies were present at age 6 months in one sibling, and as early as 36 and 48 months in two of the six informative subjects.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to collate the onset of clinical features, cytokine and endocrine autoantibodies in APS-I infants and siblings. The highly restricted early autoantibody responses and clinical features they show are not easily explained by mere loss of broad-specific self-tolerance inducing mechanisms, but hint at some more sharply focused early event(s) in autoimmunization.

Anti-cytokine autoantibodies suggest pathogenetic links with autoimmune regulator deficiency in humans and mice

Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) is a recessive disorder resulting from mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE). The patients' autoantibodies recognize not only multiple organ-specific targets, but also many type I interferons (IFNs) and most T helper type 17 (Th17) cell-associated cytokines, whose biological actions they neutralize in vitro. These anti-cytokine autoantibodies are highly disease-specific: otherwise, they have been found only in patients with thymomas, tumours of thymic epithelial cells that fail to express AIRE. Moreover, autoantibodies against Th17 cell-associated cytokines correlate with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis in both syndromes. Here, we demonstrate that the immunoglobulin (Ig)Gs but not the IgAs in APECED sera are responsible for neutralizing IFN-ω, IFN-α2a, interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-22. Their dominant subclasses proved to be IgG1 and, surprisingly, IgG4 without IgE, possibly implicating regulatory T cell responses and/or epithelia in their initiation in these AIRE-deficiency states. The epitopes on IL-22 and IFN-α2a appeared mainly conformational. We also found mainly IgG1 neutralizing autoantibodies to IL-17A in aged AIRE-deficient BALB/c mice - the first report of any target shared by these human and murine AIRE-deficiency states. We conclude that autoimmunization against cytokines in AIRE deficiency is not simply a mere side effect of chronic mucosal Candida infection, but appears to be related more closely to disease initiation.

Baseline quality of life and performance status as prognostic factors in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed plus carboplatin vs. etoposide plus carboplatin

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with poor prognosis due to its early metastatic potential and lack of improved outcomes with newer cytotoxic agents. Identifying factors associated with clinical outcomes can help clinicians determine which patients are more likely to benefit from therapy. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) subscales and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) were retrospectively analyzed as prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with extensive-stage disease (ED)-SCLC.

METHODS

Using data from a Phase III trial of pemetrexed-carboplatin vs. etoposide-carboplatin, the effect of the prognostic factors on OS and PFS was analyzed via Cox models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS parameters for the prognostic subgroups (defined by baseline FACT scores and ECOG PS).

RESULTS

Patients with higher baseline FACT-General (FACT-G) score (≥ median) had significantly higher OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, P<.0001) and PFS (HR=0.83, P=.032) compared with patients with lower FACT-G score (<median). Similar results were observed for higher baseline physical well-being (PWB) and functional well-being (FWB) scores. For OS, there was a significant interaction between PS and FACT-PWB score (P=.005). In patients with PS=2 and higher FACT-PWB scores at baseline, a 48% reduction in the risk of death (P=.025) and nearly 3-month longer median OS were estimated.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline FACT-G, FACT-PWB, and FACT-FWB scores were found to be favorable prognostic factors for survival in ED-SCLC. Higher FACT-PWB scores at baseline predicted better survival for patients with poorer PS.

Patient-reported pain and other symptoms as prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in a phase III clinical trial of patients with advanced breast cancer

1068

Background: The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy has been reported previously (Albain et al. 2008). This post-hoc analysis evaluates the prognostic effect of baseline scores of the Brief Pain Inventory short form (BPI-SF) and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) on OS. Methods: Patients completed theBPI-SF and the RSCL. BPI “worst pain” item and BPI interference subscale scores range from 0 (no pain or interference with daily living) to 10. Four RSCL subscales were transformed to 0-100, with 100 as best score. Univariate Cox models were used to determine the prognostic effect of each measure on OS. Multivariate Cox models were used to determine the prognostic effect of each measure in the presence of 11 demographic/clinical variables, including Karnofsky performance status, age, and estrogen and progesterone receptor status. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare OS among patient groups categorized using clinically meaningful thresholds and the sample median of the BPI and RSCL scores. Results: Randomized patients were evaluable for this analysis (n=529). In the univariate analysis, significant prognostic effects on OS were observed for baseline scores of both BPI measures (worst pain and interference) (HRs, 1.07 for 1-point increase; all p≤0.0042) and three out of four RSCL subscales (activity level, physical distress, quality of life) (HRs, 0.86-0.91 for 10-point increase; all p≤0.0120). In the multivariate Cox models, BPI worst pain remained as a significant prognostic factor (p=0.0245), as did RSCL activity level (p=0.0004). The median OS for patients with BPI worst pain score 0 (no pain) was 23.8 months (mos) versus 17.9 mos and 14.8 mos for scores 1-4 (mild) and 5-10 (moderate/severe) (log-rank p=0.0066). The median OS was 23.8 mos for patients with RSCL activity scores greater than or equal to the sample median (≥95.2) versus 14.6 mos for patients with scores <95.2 (log-rank p<0.0001). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis resulted in strong evidence that BPI-SF and RSCL provide distinct prognostic information for OS.

The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) as a prognostic indicator of overall survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients: Post hoc analysis of a phase III study

7075

Background: To determine the patients likely to benefit from therapy, clinicians seek factors associated with outcomes. This analysis investigates prognostic effect of baseline patient-reported symptoms on overall survival (OS) in the presence of demographic/clinical factors among MPM patients. Methods: Intent-to-treat patients (N=448) were included in the analysis. LCSS consists of 6 symptom items and 3 general items, each ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst). Average symptom burden index (ASBI) was the mean of 6 symptom items. Patients were classified into subgroups based on ASBI: low symptom burden (LSB; ASBI<25) and high symptom burden (HSB; ASBI ≥25). Univariate Cox models were used to determine the prognostic effect of 7 demographic/clinical factors, 9 LCSS items, and ASBI on OS. Multivariate Cox model was used to determine the prognostic effect of ASBI in the presence of 7 demographic/clinical factors. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS were generated for patients with LSB and HSB and compared using both univariate and multivariate Cox models. Results: In the univariate analysis, significant prognostic effects on OS were observed for baseline Karnofsky performance status (KPS; 90-100 vs. 70-80, hazard ratio [HR]=0.45, p<0.0001) and baseline stage (I/II/III vs. IV, HR=0.63, p<0.0001). In addition, significant prognostic effects were observed for 5 LCSS symptom items (anorexia, cough, dyspnea, fatigue, and pain), 3 LCSS general items (interference with activity level, symptom distress, and quality of life; HRs=1.08-1.20 for every 10 points worsening, all p<0.02), as well as ASBI (HR=1.32, p<0.0001). In the multivariate Cox model, ASBI remained a significant prognostic factor of OS (HR=1.22, p<0.0001), along with baseline KPS and stage. Patients with LSB (N=265) had significantly better OS than those with HSB (N=181) (12.9 vs. 6.9 months, HR=0.46, unadjusted p<0.0001; HR=0.59, p<0.0001 adjusted for the 7 demographic/clinical variables). Conclusions: The results suggest that baseline patient-reported symptoms as measured by LCSS provide distinct prognostic information in the presence of demographic and clinical measures in MPM.

Correlation of 24-hour urinary protein quantification with spot urine protein:creatinine ratio in lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVES

Twenty-four hour urine collection has been the foundation for monitoring patients with lupus nephritis. However, the use of protein to creatinine ratios in spot urine samples is now widely used. We aimed to evaluate the validity of this method cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted. Records of 486 lupus nephritis patients were searched for paired results of 24-h quantification of urinary protein and a random spot urine protein to creatinine ratio and were examined over a three-year period.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ninety-five lupus nephritis patients had paired results and were included in the final analysis, male/female 14/81, mean age 36.5 years. Over a three-year period there were a total of 137 samples from 95 patients. For the entire dataset, there was a significant correlation between protein:creatinine ratio and 24-h urine collection protein (mg), Spearman Rho correlation coefficient was 0.869, p < 0.0001 with (R (2 )= 0.504). There was also a strong correlation for longitudinal data, n = 14 at two-years Rho 0.910, p < 0.0001 with (R (2 )= 0.878), n = 8 at three-years Rho 0.909, p < 0.0001 and (R (2 )= 0.73). We have shown for the first time in a UK population of lupus nephritis patients, well trained in producing 24-h collection, that the spot protein:creatinine ratio correlates well with 24-h urinary total protein excretion. Having a simple, reliable, reproducible and cost-effective test such as the spot urine protein:creatinine ratio is therefore a valuable tool with which to monitor disease progression.

ASE in thin disk lasers: theory and experiment

We derive equations for the ASE intensity, decay time, and heat load. The crux of our development is frequency integration over the gain lineshape followed by a spatial integration over the emitters. These integrations result in a gain length that is determined from experiment. We measure the gain as a function of incident pump power for a multi-pass pumped Yb:YAG disk doped at 9.8 at.% with an anti-ASE cap. The incident pump powers are up to 3kW. Our fit to the measured gain is within 10% of the measured gain up to pump powers where the gain starts to flatten out and roll over. In this comparison we extract the gain length that turns out to be 43% of the pump spot size of 7mm.

Application of regularized Richardson-Lucy algorithm for deconvolution of confocal microscopy images

Although confocal microscopes have considerably smaller contribution of out-of-focus light than widefield microscopes, the confocal images can still be enhanced mathematically if the optical and data acquisition effects are accounted for. For that, several deconvolution algorithms have been proposed. As a practical solution, maximum-likelihood algorithms with regularization have been used. However, the choice of regularization parameters is often unknown although it has considerable effect on the result of deconvolution process. The aims of this work were: to find good estimates of deconvolution parameters; and to develop an open source software package that would allow testing different deconvolution algorithms and that would be easy to use in practice. Here, Richardson-Lucy algorithm has been implemented together with the total variation regularization in an open source software package IOCBio Microscope. The influence of total variation regularization on deconvolution process is determined by one parameter. We derived a formula to estimate this regularization parameter automatically from the images as the algorithm progresses. To assess the effectiveness of this algorithm, synthetic images were composed on the basis of confocal images of rat cardiomyocytes. From the analysis of deconvolved results, we have determined under which conditions our estimation of total variation regularization parameter gives good results. The estimated total variation regularization parameter can be monitored during deconvolution process and used as a stopping criterion. An inverse relation between the optimal regularization parameter and the peak signal-to-noise ratio of an image is shown. Finally, we demonstrate the use of the developed software by deconvolving images of rat cardiomyocytes with stained mitochondria and sarcolemma obtained by confocal and widefield microscopes.

Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of administration of pemetrexed-an antifolate antineoplastic agent-in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We assessed pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in patients with this disease.

METHODS

This randomised double-blind study was undertaken in 83 centres in 20 countries. 663 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) plus best supportive care (n=441) or placebo plus best supportive care (n=222) in 21-day cycles until disease progression. Treatment was randomised with the Simon and Pocock minimisation method. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. All patients received vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival and the secondary endpoint of overall survival were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804.

FINDINGS

All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Pemetrexed significantly improved progression-free survival (4.3 months [95% CI 4.1-4.7] vs 2.6 months [1.7-2.8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, p<0.0001) and overall survival (13.4 months [11.9-15.9] vs 10.6 months [8.7-12.0]; HR 0.79, 0.65-0.95, p=0.012) compared with placebo. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxic effects were higher in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (21 [5%] vs three [1%]). Drug-related grade three or higher toxic effects were higher with pemetrexed than with placebo (70 [16%] vs nine [4%]; p<0.0001), specifically fatigue (22 [5%] vs one [1%], p=0.001) and neutropenia (13 [3%] vs 0, p=0.006). No pemetrexed-related deaths occurred. Relatively fewer patients in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group received systemic post-discontinuation therapy (227 [51%] vs 149 [67%]; p=0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is well tolerated and offers improved progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly.

Maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (Plac) plus BSC: A randomized phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

CRA8000

Background: Pemetrexed's efficacy, favorable tolerability profile, and ease of administration provided a strong rationale for evaluation as maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. We present the final analyses for all outcomes, including overall survival (OS), from a phase III study of Pem vs. Plac (Ciuleanu, J Clin Oncol 26, 2008, A 8011) in pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: In this double-blind trial, pts were randomized 2:1 to receive Pem (500 mg/m2, day 1) plus BSC or Plac plus BSC in 21-day cycles until disease progression. All pts received vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone. The final OS analysis was performed using an unadjusted Cox model. Overall α = 0.05 for PFS and OS. Results: In the 663 randomized pts (Pem 441: Plac 222), Pem resulted in significantly better OS (13.4 vs. 10.6 mos [HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65–0.95, P = 0.012]). As reported earlier, Pem also had better PFS (P <0.00001) and response (P <0.001) ( Table ). The improvements in PFS and OS were observed primarily in patients with non-squamous histology (PFS HR = 0.47 and OS HR = 0.70). Treatment by histology interaction for OS was significant (P = 0.038). Drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities were higher for Pem (16% vs 4%; P <0.001); specifically, fatigue (5% vs 0.5%) and neutropenia (2.9% vs. 0%). Grade 3/4 toxicities did not increase significantly in pts who received ≥6 and ≥10 cycles of Pem. There were no Pem-related deaths. Fewer pts in the Pem arm (51.5% vs 67.1%; P <0.001) received systemic post-discontinuation therapy. Conclusions: Pem maintenance therapy is well tolerated and offers superior OS and PFS compared with Plac, making it a new treatment paradigm for patients with advanced NSCLC who respond to initial therapy. This trial further validates that Pem has greater efficacy in patients with non-squamous histology.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Survival without toxicity for cisplatin plus pemetrexed versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in chemonaïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a risk-benefit analysis of a large phase III study

BACKGROUND

In a large phase III study, cisplatin and pemetrexed had non-inferior efficacy and better tolerability compared with cisplatin and gemcitabine in chemonaïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current analysis characterised the clinical benefit (i.e. survival) relative to clinical risk (i.e. drug-related toxicity) of the doublets.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1669 patients (of 1725 randomised) received 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed IV followed by 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin IV on day 1 or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1, administered every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Survival without toxicity (i.e. clinical benefit to risk) was defined as the time from randomisation to the first occurrence of any grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicity or death, and was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods.

RESULTS

In the overall patient population, survival without grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicity was significantly longer for patients treated with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus cisplatin and gemcitabine (HR=0.70; P<0.001), as was survival without grade 4 drug-related toxicity (HR=0.83; P<0.001). For patients with non-squamous NSCLC, survival without toxicity with cisplatin and pemetrexed was superior to cisplatin and gemcitabine for grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicity (HR=0.64; P<0.001) and for grade 4 drug-related toxicity (HR=0.77; P<0.001), whereas no treatment-arm difference was observed in the squamous subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with front-line cisplatin and pemetrexed have superior survival without toxicity (i.e. clinical benefit-to-risk profile) compared with patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine.

Maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (Plac) plus BSC: A randomized phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

CRA8000

The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[Table: see text]

Learning to be tolerant: how T cells keep out of trouble

A pool of immature T cells with a seemingly unrestricted repertoire of antigen specificities is generated life-long in the thymus. Amongst these cells are, however, thymocytes that express a strongly self-reactive antigen receptor and hence hold the potential to trigger autoimmunity. To prevent such an outcome, the thymus employs several independent but functionally related strategies that act in parallel to enforce self-tolerance. The deletion of strongly self-reactive thymocytes and the generation of regulatory T cells constitute the two most efficient mechanisms to induce and maintain immunological tolerance. Thymic epithelial cells of the medulla express for this purpose tissue-restricted self-antigens. This review will focus on the cellular and molecular mechanisms operative in the thymus to shape a repertoire of mature T cells tolerant to self-antigens.

The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two Phase III studies

BACKGROUND

Recent studies of pemetrexed have identified a predictive role for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histology. We further reviewed the differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to histology in two large, phase III NSCLC trials.

METHODS

One study tested pemetrexed versus docetaxel in previously treated patients (n = 571) and the other tested cisplatin plus pemetrexed versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 1,725) with advanced NSCLC. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test for covariate-adjusted treatment-by-histology interactions (THIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). For each histologic subgroup, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate unadjusted within-arm medians, and Cox models were used to estimate covariate-adjusted between-arm hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

In both studies, treatment arms were well balanced for histology. THIs were statistically significant (p < .005) for both OS and PFS. Nonsquamous patients treated with pemetrexed-based therapy experienced longer survival than the comparators (HR, 0.78 and 0.84, respectively), whereas squamous patients had shorter survival (HR, 1.56 and 1.23, respectively). Whereas the efficacy of pemetrexed regimens differed according to histology, it did not differ for docetaxel or for cisplatin plus gemcitabine. Pemetrexed was well tolerated across histologic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of these results across studies confirms the predictive effect of histology for pemetrexed and the survival advantage for pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous histology. These analyses suggest pemetrexed should not be recommended for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma, but, because of efficacy and safety advantages, pemetrexed may be preferable to other agents for treatment of patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.