1
|
Bullock L, Manning F, Hawarden A, Fleming J, Leyland S, Clark EM, Thomas S, Gidlow C, Iglesias-Urrutia CP, Protheroe J, Lefroy J, Ryan S, O'Neill TW, Mallen C, Jinks C, Paskins Z. Exploring practice and perspectives on shared decision-making about osteoporosis medicines in Fracture Liaison Services: the iFraP development qualitative study. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:50. [PMID: 38898212 PMCID: PMC11186902 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01410-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Interviews and focus groups with patients, FLS clinicians, and GPs identified challenges relating to clinical and shared decision-making about bone health and osteoporosis medicines. Findings will inform the development of the multicomponent iFraP intervention to address identified training needs and barriers to implementation to facilitate SDM about osteoporosis medicines. PURPOSE The iFraP (improving uptake of Fracture Prevention treatments) study aimed to develop a multicomponent intervention, including an osteoporosis decision support tool (DST), to support shared decision-making (SDM) about osteoporosis medicines. To inform iFraP intervention development, this qualitative study explored current practice in relation to communication about bone health and osteoporosis medicines, anticipated barriers to, and facilitators of, an osteoporosis DST, and perceived training needs. METHODS Patients attending an FLS consultation (n = 8), FLS clinicians (n = 9), and general practitioners (GPs; n = 7) were purposively sampled to participate in a focus group and/or telephone interview. Data were transcribed, inductively coded, and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as a deductive framework to systematically identify possible barriers to, and facilitators of, implementing a DST. RESULTS Inductive codes were deductively mapped to 12 TDF domains. FLS clinicians were perceived to have specialist expertise (knowledge). However, clinicians described aspects of clinical decision-making and risk communication as difficult (cognitive skills). Patients reflected on decisional uncertainty about medicines (decision processes). Discussions about current practice and the proposed DST indicated opportunities to facilitate SDM, if identified training needs are met. Potential individual and system-level barriers to implementation were identified, such as differences in FLS configuration and a move to remote consulting (environmental context and resources). CONCLUSIONS Understanding of current practice revealed unmet training needs, indicating that using a DST in isolation would be unlikely to produce a sustained shift to SDM. Findings will shape iFraP intervention development to address unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurna Bullock
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - Fay Manning
- University of Exeter Medical School, Devon, UK
| | - Ashley Hawarden
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Jane Fleming
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Addenbrooke's Hospital Fracture Liaison Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Emma M Clark
- Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Simon Thomas
- Prescribing Decision Support Ltd and School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Christopher Gidlow
- Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Danish Centre for Healthcare Improvement (CHI), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Joanne Protheroe
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Janet Lefroy
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Sarah Ryan
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Terence W O'Neill
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Christian Mallen
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Clare Jinks
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bastiany A, Towns C, Kimmaliardjuk DM, Kalenga CZ, Burgess SN. Engaging women in decision-making about their heart health: a literature review with patients' perspective. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 38815591 DOI: 10.1139/cjpp-2023-0471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death globally. Although the burden of CVD risk factors tends to be lower in women, they remain at higher risk of developing complications when affected by these risk factors. There is still a lack of awareness surrounding CVD in women, both from a patient's and a clinician's perspective, especially among visible minorities. However, women who are informed about their heart health and who engage in decision-making with their healthcare providers are more likely to modify their lifestyle, and improve their CVD risk. A patient-centered care approach benefits patients' physical and mental health, and is now considered gold-standard for efficient patient care. Engaging women in their heart health will contribute in closing the gap of healthcare disparities between men and women, arising from sociocultural, socioeconomic, and political factors. This comprehensive review of the literature discusses the importance of engaging women in decision-making surrounding their heart health and offers tools for an effective and culturally sensitive patient-provider relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Bastiany
- Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Department of Cardiology, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (NOSMU), Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Cindy Towns
- Wellington Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Cindy Z Kalenga
- Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sonya N Burgess
- Nepean Hospital, Department of Cardiology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peters LJ, Torres-Castaño A, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Perestelo Perez L, Ubbink DT. What helps the successful implementation of digital decision aids supporting shared decision-making in cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022; 4:53-62. [PMID: 36743877 PMCID: PMC9890083 DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Aims Although digital decision aids (DAs) have been developed to improve shared decision-making (SDM), also in the cardiovascular realm, its implementation seems challenging. This study aims to systematically review the predictors of successful implementation of digital DAs for cardiovascular diseases. Methods and results Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 2021. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias. Data were extracted by using a predefined list of variables. Five good-quality studies were included, involving data of 215 patients and 235 clinicians. Studies focused on DAs for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and end-stage heart failure patients. Clinicians reported DA content, its effectivity, and a lack of knowledge on SDM and DA use as implementation barriers. Patients reported preference for another format, the way clinicians used the DA and anxiety for the upcoming intervention as barriers. In addition, barriers were related to the timing and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) integration of the DA, the limited duration of a consultation, a lack of communication among the team members, and maintaining the hospital's number of treatments. Clinicians' positive attitude towards preference elicitation and implementation of DAs in existing structures were reported as facilitators. Conclusion To improve digital DA use in cardiovascular diseases, the optimum timing of the DA, training healthcare professionals in SDM and DA usage, and integrating DAs into existing ICT structures need special effort. Current evidence, albeit limited, already offers advice on how to improve DA implementation in cardiovascular medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin
- Research Support Medical Library, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schubbe D, Yen RW, Saunders CH, Elwyn G, Forcino RC, O'Malley AJ, Politi MC, Margenthaler J, Volk RJ, Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Percac-Lima S, Bradley A, Goodwin C, van den Muijsenbergh M, Aarts JWM, Scalia P, Durand MA. Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices. Implement Sci 2021; 16:51. [PMID: 33971913 PMCID: PMC8108365 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01115-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conversation aids can facilitate shared decision-making and improve patient-centered outcomes. However, few examples exist of sustained use of conversation aids in routine care due to numerous barriers at clinical and organizational levels. We explored factors that will promote the sustained use of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids. We examined differences in opinions between the two conversation aids and across socioeconomic strata. METHODS We nested this study within a randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the effectiveness of two early-stage breast cancer surgery conversation aids, one text-based and one picture-based. These conversation aids facilitated more shared decision-making and improved the decision process, among other outcomes, across four health systems with socioeconomically diverse patient populations. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patient participants across conversation aid assignment and socioeconomic status (SES) and collected observations and field notes. We interviewed trial surgeons and other stakeholders. Two independent coders conducted framework analysis using the NOrmalization MeAsure Development through Normalization Process Theory. We also conducted an inductive analysis. We conducted additional sub-analyses based on conversation aid assignment and patient SES. RESULTS We conducted 73 semi-structured interviews with 43 patients, 16 surgeons, and 14 stakeholders like nurses, cancer center directors, and electronic health record (EHR) experts. Patients and surgeons felt the conversation aids should be used in breast cancer care in the future and were open to various methods of giving and receiving the conversation aid (EHR, email, patient portal, before consultation). Patients of higher SES were more likely to note the conversation aids influenced their treatment discussion, while patients of lower SES noted more influence on their decision-making. Intervention surgeons reported using the conversation aids did not lengthen their typical consultation time. Most intervention surgeons felt using the conversation aids enhanced their usual care after using it a few times, and most patients felt it appeared part of their normal routine. CONCLUSIONS Key factors that will guide the future sustained implementation of the conversation aids include adapting to existing clinical workflows, flexibility of use, patient characteristics, and communication preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03136367 , registered on May 2, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Schubbe
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Renata W Yen
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Catherine H Saunders
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Rachel C Forcino
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - A James O'Malley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Mary C Politi
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Julie Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Robert J Volk
- Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Massachusetts General Hospital's Chelsea Healthcare Center, Chelsea, MA, USA
| | - Ann Bradley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Courtney Goodwin
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Peter Scalia
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- UMR 1295, CERPOP, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31000, Toulouse, France.
- Unisanté, Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Rue du Bugnon 44, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sahl S, Pontoriero MI, Hill C, Knoepke CE. Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of shared decision making to empower youth who have experienced commercial sexual exploitation. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW 2021; 122:105894. [PMID: 34446975 PMCID: PMC8386426 DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) has been proposed as a method to improve treatment adherence, placement stability, and other youth-centric outcomes for children who have been victims of commercial sexual exploitation (CSEC). This project seeks to characterize service providers' perspectives on the adoption and implementation of SDM into treatment and placement planning decisions. METHOD Sixteen key stakeholders who provide services for youth who have experienced CSEC in a Southern city, as well as adults who survived exploitation as children, were individually interviewed. These interviews focused on stakeholders' perspective on the appropriateness and contextual considerations regarding implementing this model to engage youth in decision-making conversations. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using group-based inductive content analysis. RESULT While all participants acknowledged the philosophical importance of including youth in decision-making, perspectives varied on how this philosophy could be operationalized. Trauma-bonds to offenders, distrust in service systems, and policy and time constraints were discussed as potential barriers to implementation. Perceived benefits to applying this model included encouraging youth empowerment, helping youth develop decision-making skills, and strengthening relationships between youth and providers. Implementation considerations mirrored those seen in other medical and behavioral health settings, including extensive training, fidelity monitoring, enforcement through policy and legislation, and ultimately resetting the culture of services to be maximally youth inclusive. CONCLUSION Participants supported the use of SDM to standardize the inclusion of youth in treatment and placement planning decisions. However, there exist challenges in defining exactly how to adopt this approach, and how to implement broad-scale cultural change within the service-providing community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Sahl
- National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Alexandria, VA, USA
- USC Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, CA, USA
| | - Maria Isabella Pontoriero
- Children’s Hospital New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA
- Tulane University School of Social Work, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Chloe Hill
- Tulane University School of Social Work, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Christopher E. Knoepke
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
- Adult & Child Consortium for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tong WT, Lee YK, Ng CJ, Lee PY. Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244645. [PMID: 33378349 PMCID: PMC7773191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patient decision aids (PDAs) are developed in academic settings by academic researchers. Academic settings are different from public health clinics where the focus is on clinical work. Thus, research on implementation in public health settings will provide insights to effective implementation of PDA in real-world settings. This study explores perceived factors influencing implementation of an insulin PDA in five public health clinics. METHODS This study adopted a comparative case study design with a qualitative focus to identify similarities and differences of the potential barriers and facilitators to implementing the insulin PDA across different sites. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 28 healthcare providers and 15 patients from five public health clinics under the Ministry of Health in Malaysia. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic approach. RESULTS Five themes emerged which were: 1) time constraint; 2) PDA costs; 3) tailoring PDA use to patient profile; 4) patient decisional role; and 5) leadership and staff motivation. Based on the interviews and drawing on observations and interview reflection notes, time constraint emerged as the common prominent factor that cut across all the clinics, however, tailoring PDA use to patient profile; patient decisional role; leadership and staff motivation varied due to the distinct challenges faced by specific clinics. Among clinics from semi-urban areas with more patients from limited education and lower socio-economic status, patients' ability to comprehend the insulin PDA and their tendency to rely on their doctors and family to make health decisions were felt to be a prominent barrier to the insulin PDA implementation. Staff motivation appeared to be stronger in most of the clinics where specific time was allocated to diabetes team to attend to diabetes patients and this was felt could be a potential facilitator, however, a lack of leadership might affect the insulin PDA implementation even though a diabetes team is present. CONCLUSIONS This study found time constraint as a major potential barrier for PDA implementation and effective implementation of the insulin PDA across different public health clinics would depend on leadership and staff motivation and, the need to tailor PDA use to patient profile. To ensure successful implementation, implementers should avoid a 'one size fits all' approach when implementing health innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Ting Tong
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- * E-mail:
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ping Yein Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tong WT, Ng CJ, Lee YK, Lee PY. What will make patients use a patient decision aid? A qualitative study on patients' perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:755-764. [PMID: 31115132 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES Few studies focus on patients' views on factors influencing implementation of patient decision aids (PDAs). This study aims to explore patients' views on the factors influencing implementation of an "insulin choice" PDA in a primary care setting. METHODS This study used a descriptive qualitative study design. Interviews were conducted using a semistructured interview guide developed based on the theoretical domains framework. Nine in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions were conducted with patients with type 2 diabetes who have been advised to start insulin or were currently using insulin and those who had been seeking diabetes treatment in the clinic for more than 1 year. Interviews were conducted after the participants were familiarized with the PDA. Data were analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS Five themes emerged from the data analysis: (a) trust in the physician (patients preferred physicians to other health care providers in delivering the insulin PDA to them as they trusted physicians more when it comes to making decisions such as starting insulin), (b) physician's attitude (patients were more likely to trust a physician who is friendly and sympathetic hence would be more willing to use the insulin PDA), (c) physician's communication style (patients were more willing to use the insulin PDA if the physicians would take time and guide them in the PDA use), (d) conducive environment (patients preferred to read the PDA at home), and (e) cost (patients would not be willing to pay to use the insulin PDA unless they needed it). CONCLUSIONS Patients want physicians to play a major role in the implementation of the insulin PDA; physicians' communication style and commitment may influence implementation outcomes. Health care authorities need to create a conducive environment and provide patients with free access to PDA to promote effective implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Ting Tong
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ping Yein Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Latenstein CSS, Thunnissen FM, Thomeer BJM, van Wely BJ, Meinders MJ, Elwyn G, de Reuver PR. The association between patients' preferred treatment after the use of a patient decision aid and their choice of eventual treatment. Health Expect 2020; 23:651-658. [PMID: 32167653 PMCID: PMC7321744 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the association between patients' preferred treatment and eventual treatment. Second, to compare patients with surgical treatment to watchful waiting in order to identify predictive factors for surgery. Methods A single‐centre retrospective study was performed between December 2015 and August 2018. Patients (≥18 years) who used a patient decision aid (PDA) for gallstones or inguinal hernia were included. After their first surgical consultation, patients received access to an online PDA. The patients' preferred treatment after the PDA was compared with their choice of eventual treatment. Multivariable regression analyses were performed for predictive factors for surgery. Results In total, 567 patients with gallstones and 585 patients with an inguinal hernia were included. Of the patients with gallstones, 121 (21%) preferred watchful waiting, 367 (65%) preferred surgery, and 79 (14%) were not sure. The patients' preferred treatment was performed in 85.9%. Frequent pain attacks (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1‐3.9, P = .020) and preference for surgery (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9‐10.1, P = .001) independently predicted surgery. Of the patients with an inguinal hernia, 77 (13.2%) preferred watchful waiting, 452 (78.8%) preferred surgery, and 56 (9.6%) were not sure. The patients' preferred treatment was performed in 86.0%. The preference for surgery (OR 5.2, 95% CI 2.5‐10.6, P < .001) independently predicted surgery and worry about complications predicted avoidance of surgery (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2‐1.0, P = .037). Conclusion This study, reflecting current clinical care, shows that patients' preferred treatment after using a PDA matches their eventual treatment choice in 86% of patients with gallstones or an inguinal hernia. In these patients, symptoms and patients' preference for surgery independently predicts eventual choice of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Floris M Thunnissen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marjan J Meinders
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kinsey K, Firth J, Elwyn G, Edwards A, Brain K, Marrin K, Nye A, Wood F. Patients' views on the use of an Option Grid for knee osteoarthritis in physiotherapy clinical encounters: An interview study. Health Expect 2017; 20:1302-1310. [PMID: 28779512 PMCID: PMC5689238 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient decision support tools have been developed as a means of providing accurate and accessible information in order for patients to make informed decisions about their care. Option Grids™ are a type of decision support tool specifically designed to be used during clinical encounters. Objective To explore patients’ views of the Option Grid encounter tool used in clinical consultations with physiotherapists, in comparison with usual care, within a patient population who are likely to be disadvantaged by age and low health literacy. Methods Semi‐structured interviews with 72 patients (36 who had been given an Option Grid in their consultation and 36 who had not). Thematic analysis explored patients’ understanding of treatment options, perceptions of involvement, and readability and utility of the Option Grid. Results Interviews suggested that the Option Grid facilitated more detailed discussion about the risks and benefits of a wider range of treatment options for osteoarthritis of the knee. Participants indicated that the Option Grid was clear and aided their understanding of a structured progression of the options as their condition advanced, although it was not clear whether the Option Grid facilitated greater engagement in shared decision making. Discussion and conclusion The Option Grid for osteoarthritis of the knee was well received by patient participants who reported that it helped them to understand their options, and made the notion of choice explicit. Use of Option Grids should be considered within routine consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jill Firth
- Pennine MSK Partnership Ltd, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth, NH, USA
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Katherine Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Katy Marrin
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alan Nye
- Pennine MSK Partnership Ltd, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Wood
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Qu H, Shewchuk RM, Alarcón G, Fraenkel L, Leong A, Dall'Era M, Yazdany J, Singh JA. Mapping Perceptions of Lupus Medication Decision-Making Facilitators: The Importance of Patient Context. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 68:1787-1794. [PMID: 27059939 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Revised: 03/13/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Numerous factors can impede or facilitate patients' medication decision-making and adherence to physicians' recommendations. Little is known about how patients and physicians jointly view issues that affect the decision-making process. Our objective was to derive an empirical framework of patient-identified facilitators to lupus medication decision-making from key stakeholders (including 15 physicians, 5 patients/patient advocates, and 8 medical professionals) using a patient-centered cognitive mapping approach. METHODS We used nominal group patient panels to identify facilitators to lupus treatment decision-making. Stakeholders independently sorted the identified facilitators (n = 98) based on their similarities and rated the importance of each facilitator in patient decision-making. Data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis. RESULTS A cognitive map was derived that represents an empirical framework of facilitators for lupus treatment decisions from multiple stakeholders' perspectives. The facilitator clusters were 1) hope for a normal/healthy life, 2) understand benefits and effectiveness of taking medications, 3) desire to minimize side effects, 4) medication-related data, 5) medication effectiveness for "me," 6) family focus, 7) confidence in physician, 8) medication research, 9) reassurance about medication, and 10) medication economics. CONCLUSION Consideration of how different stakeholders perceive the relative importance of lupus medication decision-making clusters is an important step toward improving patient-physician communication and effective shared decision-making. The empirically derived framework of medication decision-making facilitators can be used as a guide to develop a lupus decision aid that focuses on improving physician-patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Liana Fraenkel
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Amye Leong
- Healthy Motivation, Santa Barbara, California
| | | | | | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Birmingham VA Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Using quantitative risk information in decisions about statins: a qualitative study in a community setting. Br J Gen Pract 2016; 65:e264-9. [PMID: 25824187 PMCID: PMC4377596 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15x684433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A large literature informs guidance for GPs about communicating quantitative risk information so as to facilitate shared decision making. However, relatively little has been written about how patients utilise such information in practice. Aim To understand the role of quantitative risk information in patients’ accounts of decisions about taking statins. Design and setting This was a qualitative study, with participants recruited and interviewed in community settings. Method Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 participants aged >50 years, all of whom had been offered statins. Data were analysed thematically, using elements of the constant comparative method. Results Interviewees drew frequently on numerical test results to explain their decisions about preventive medication. In contrast, they seldom mentioned quantitative risk information, and never offered it as a rationale for action. Test results were spoken of as objects of concern despite an often-explicit absence of understanding, so lack of understanding seems unlikely to explain the non-use of risk estimates. Preventive medication was seen as ‘necessary’ either to treat test results, or because of personalised, unequivocal advice from a doctor. Conclusion This study’s findings call into question the assumption that people will heed and use numerical risk information once they understand it; these data highlight the need to consider the ways in which different kinds of knowledge are used in practice in everyday contexts. There was little evidence from this study that understanding probabilistic risk information was a necessary or valued condition for making decisions about statin use.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hogden A, Greenfield D, Caga J, Cai X. Development of patient decision support tools for motor neuron disease using stakeholder consultation: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010532. [PMID: 27053272 PMCID: PMC4823454 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Motor neuron disease (MND) is a terminal, progressive, multisystem disorder. Well-timed decisions are key to effective symptom management. To date, there are few published decision support tools, also known as decision aids, to guide patients in making ongoing choices for symptom management and quality of life. This protocol is to develop and validate decision support tools for patients and families to use in conjunction with health professionals in MND multidisciplinary care. The tools will inform patients and families of the benefits and risks of each option, as well as the consequences of accepting or declining treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study is being conducted from June 2015 to May 2016, using a modified Delphi process. A 2-stage, 7-step process will be used to develop the tools, based on existing literature and stakeholder feedback. The first stage will be to develop the decision support tools, while the second stage will be to validate both the tools and the process used to develop them. Participants will form expert panels, to provide feedback on which the development and validation of the tools will be based. Participants will be drawn from patients with MND, family carers and health professionals, support association workers, peak body representatives, and MND and patient decision-making researchers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the study has been granted by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), approval number 5201500658. Knowledge translation will be conducted via publications, seminar and conference presentations to patients and families, health professionals and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hogden
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Greenfield
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jashelle Caga
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Xiongcai Cai
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Qualitative Insights from the Osteoporosis Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature. J Osteoporos 2016; 2016:7915041. [PMID: 27994908 PMCID: PMC5138461 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7915041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose. Much of the research on osteoporosis has been generated quantitatively. However, the qualitative osteoporosis literature provides valuable information on patient and clinician experiences and perspectives, informing the design and implementation of health research and healthcare services. To identify knowledge gaps and inform the design of future qualitative research, a narrative review was conducted to consolidate and synthesize the existing insights available within the qualitative osteoporosis research. Methods. Search terms reflecting the domains of osteoporosis and qualitative research were entered into the Scopus database to generate a comprehensive survey of qualitative research in the area of osteoporosis. Articles were thematically analysed and the results are presented in the form of a narrative review. Results. Forty-four articles were included in the narrative review. Qualitative research in the field of osteoporosis research can be summarized by 3 thematic areas: the meaning of osteoporosis for patients and the public, the lived experience of an osteoporosis diagnosis, and the programmatic approach to osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Conclusions. Qualitative studies provide clinically valuable insights in how osteoporosis is conceptualized and managed and programmatic aspects of osteoporosis treatment. The findings of this narrative review suggest the need for balance between presenting osteoporosis as a serious health condition and producing unwarranted anxiety and inactivity so as to ensure the best possible outcomes for individuals with osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
14
|
Voshaar MJH, Nota I, van de Laar MAFJ, van den Bemt BJF. Patient-centred care in established rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015; 29:643-63. [PMID: 26697772 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Review of the evidence on patient-centred care (PCC) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) shows that involving the patient as an individual - with unique needs, concerns and preferences - has a relevant impact on treatment outcomes (safety, effectiveness and costs). This approach empowers patients to take personal responsibility for their treatment. Because clinicians are only able to interact personally with their patients just a few hours per year, patients with a chronic condition such as RA should be actively involved in the management of their disease. To stimulate this active role, five different PCC activities can be distinguished: (1) patient education, (2) patient involvement/shared decision-making, (3) patient empowerment/self-management, (4) involvement of family and friends and (5) physical and emotional support. This article reviews the existing knowledge on these five PCC activities in the context of established RA management, especially focused on opportunities to increase medication adherence in established RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - I Nota
- University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - M A F J van de Laar
- University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - B J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement. Clin Rheumatol 2014; 35:1225-35. [PMID: 25392118 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-014-2820-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2014] [Revised: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to gain insight into arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making (MDM) and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 patients suffering from Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Many patients perceived the questions about involvement in MDM as difficult, mostly because they were unaware of having a choice. Shared decision-making (SDM) was generally preferred, but the preferred level of involvement varied between and within individuals. Preference regarding involvement may vary according to the type of treatment and the severity of the complaints. A considerable group of respondents would have liked more participation than they had experienced in the past. Perceived barriers could be divided into doctor-related (e.g. a paternalistic attitude), patient-related (e.g. lack of knowledge) and context-related (e.g. too little time to decide) factors. This study demonstrates the complexity of predicting patients' preferences regarding involvement in MDM: most RA patients prefer SDM, but their preference may vary according to the situation they are in and the extent to which they experience barriers in getting more involved. Unawareness of having a choice is still a major barrier for patient participation. The attending physician seems to have an important role as facilitator in enhancing patient participation by raising awareness and offering options, but implementing SDM is a shared responsibility; all parties need to be involved and educated.
Collapse
|
16
|
Brown I, Bradley A, Ng CJ, Colwell B, Mathers N. Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7:347. [PMID: 24908099 PMCID: PMC4062287 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components are active for improving decision processes. To investigate the experiences of using a diabetes treatment decision aid and to explore how components within a complex intervention influenced the decision making process. METHODS A pragmatic mixed methods study nested within the PANDAs cluster randomised trial of a patient decision aid. Themes inductively derived from interviews and observation of consultations with further triangulation with results of decision quality and involvement measurements and case analyses. RESULTS The decision aid intervention was employed flexibly within the consultation with both the patient and clinician active in marshalling elements. The decision aid improved processing and organization of information needed for decision making within the consultation interaction. It also improved decision quality by preparing the patient for active involvement within the clinical consultation. CONCLUSION The intervention was acceptable, flexible and readily implemented in primary care consultations. The decision aid was effective in facilitating cognitive processing. The intervention also facilitated rehearsal in preparation for active roles in a shared decision process. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trials Register Number: ISRCTN14842077. Date registered: 24.06.2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Brown
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, UK
| | - Alastair Bradley
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Brigitte Colwell
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nigel Mathers
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu SM, Lee HL, Yeh MY, Che HL. Reasons for middle-aged women in Taiwan to choose hysterectomy: a qualitative study using the bounded rationality perspective. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23:3366-77. [PMID: 24605776 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore women's perspectives on deciding to undergo hysterectomy for benign conditions based on physicians' recommendations and the women's own judgement. BACKGROUND Hysterectomy is the second most common surgical procedure worldwide. Although most hysterectomies are elective, physicians may recommend treatment that involves a loss of sexuality or ovary removal, creating a difficult choice for women. DESIGN Qualitative, in-depth interview METHODS A purposive sample of 17 women was recruited. The women had decided to undergo hysterectomy after the diagnosis of uterine fibroids. All these women had already decided not to have more children. Data were collected by in-depth interviewing, and content analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS Our study revealed five themes: release from stress, inescapable fate, positive support, hoping for peace of mind and sense of trust. CONCLUSIONS The participants felt that mental and physical health were the most important considerations, noting that when women no longer want children, a uterus is useless. The women believed that they retained their womanhood, even without a uterus, and were satisfied with the outcomes of their hysterectomy decisions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Our findings might serve as educational and counselling reference materials for healthcare providers, ensuring that women receive appropriate care quality and have their needs met. Healthcare providers can then maximise women's empowerment, deepen their awareness of body image and their concept of self-care and help them to clearly perceive their own concerns and needs so that they can make suitable decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Mei Wu
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2014; 94:291-309. [PMID: 24305642 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 720] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2013] [Revised: 10/16/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making (SDM) and develop a taxonomy of patient-reported barriers. METHODS Systematic review and thematic synthesis. Study findings/results for each included paper were extracted verbatim and entered into qualitative software for inductive analysis. RESULTS Electronic and follow-up searches yielded 2956 unique references; 289 full-text articles were retrieved, of which 45 articles from 44 unique studies met inclusion criteria. Key descriptive themes were grouped under two broad analytical themes: how the healthcare system is organized (4 descriptive themes) and what happens during the decision-making interaction (4 descriptive themes, 10 sub-themes). Predominant emergent themes related to patients' knowledge and the power imbalance in the doctor-patient relationship. Patients need knowledge and power to participate in SDM - knowledge alone is insufficient and power is more difficult to attain. CONCLUSION Many barriers are potentially modifiable, and can be addressed by attitudinal changes at the levels of patient, clinician/healthcare team, and the organization. The results support the view that many patients currently can't participate in SDM, rather than they won't participate because they do not want to. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future implementation efforts should address patient-reported factors together with known clinician-reported barriers and the wider organizational context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, Mann M, Edwards AGK, Clay C, Légaré F, Weijden TVD, Lewis CL, Wexler RM, Frosch DL. "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S14. [PMID: 24625083 PMCID: PMC4044318 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two decades of research has established the positive effect of using patient-targeted decision support interventions: patients gain knowledge, greater understanding of probabilities and increased confidence in decisions. Yet, despite their efficacy, the effectiveness of these decision support interventions in routine practice has yet to be established; widespread adoption has not occurred. The aim of this review was to search for and analyze the findings of published peer-reviewed studies that investigated the success levels of strategies or methods where attempts were made to implement patient-targeted decision support interventions into routine clinical settings. METHODS An electronic search strategy was devised and adapted for the following databases: ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC, Medline, Medline-in-process, OpenSIGLE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Social Services Abstracts, and the Web of Science. In addition, we used snowballing techniques. Studies were included after dual independent assessment. RESULTS After assessment, 5322 abstracts yielded 51 articles for consideration. After examining full-texts, 17 studies were included and subjected to data extraction. The approach used in all studies was one where clinicians and their staff used a referral model, asking eligible patients to use decision support. The results point to significant challenges to the implementation of patient decision support using this model, including indifference on the part of health care professionals. This indifference stemmed from a reported lack of confidence in the content of decision support interventions and concern about disruption to established workflows, ultimately contributing to organizational inertia regarding their adoption. CONCLUSIONS It seems too early to make firm recommendations about how best to implement patient decision support into routine practice because approaches that use a 'referral model' consistently report difficulties. We sense that the underlying issues that militate against the use of patient decision support and, more generally, limit the adoption of shared decision making, are under-investigated and under-specified. Future reports from implementation studies could be improved by following guidelines, for example the SQUIRE proposals, and by adopting methods that would be able to go beyond the 'barriers' and 'facilitators' approach to understand more about the nature of professional and organizational resistance to these tools. The lack of incentives that reward the use of these interventions needs to be considered as a significant impediment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glyn Elwyn
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D - 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Tietbohl
- Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, California, 94301, USA
| | - Mala Mann
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Adrian GK Edwards
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Catharine Clay
- Office of Professional Education and Outreach, The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 203, Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, USA
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Centre of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital Saint-François D'Assise, 10, rue de l’Espinay, Québec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of General Practice, School CAPHRI, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen L Lewis
- University of North Carolina, Campus Box 7110, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Richard M Wexler
- Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, 40 Court Street, Suite 300, Boston, Massachusetts, 02108, USA
| | - Dominick L Frosch
- Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, California, 94301, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sivell S, Marsh W, Edwards A, Manstead ASR, Clements A, Elwyn G. Theory-based design and field-testing of an intervention to support women choosing surgery for breast cancer: BresDex. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 86:179-188. [PMID: 21571485 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2010] [Revised: 03/07/2011] [Accepted: 04/08/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Design and undertake usability and field-testing evaluation of a theory-guided decision aid (BresDex) in supporting women choosing surgery for early breast cancer. METHODS An extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Common Sense Model of Illness Representations (CSM) guided the design of BresDex. BresDex was evaluated and refined across 3 cycles by interviewing 6 women without personal history of breast cancer, 8 women with personal history of breast cancer who had completed treatment and 11 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Participants were interviewed for views on content, presentation (usability) and perceived usefulness towards deciding on treatment (utility). Framework analysis was used, guided by the extended TPB and the CSM. RESULTS BresDex was positively received in content and presentation (usability). It appeared an effective support to decision-making and useful source for further information, particularly in clarifying attitudes, social norms and perceived behavioral control, and presenting consequences of decisions (utility). CONCLUSION This study illustrates the potential benefit of the extended TPB and CSM in designing a decision aid to support women choosing breast cancer surgery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS BresDex could provide decision-making support and serve as an additional source of information, to complement the care received from the clinical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Sivell
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Group, Wales Cancer Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease which affects a significant number of people during working life and retirement. The principle symptoms of OA are pain, stiffness, and potentially reduced movement and function of the affected joint. In severe OA the ability to engage in work or social activity may be restricted and as a result, the health-related quality of life of the patient may be affected. There are a variety of approaches which can be implemented to manage symptoms, including the use of orthoses, exercise programmes or in severe cases, arthroplasty. It is important that emphasis is placed on patient empowerment and shared decision-making with regard to managing symptoms and preserving or improving function or the affected joint(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie Walker
- Clinical Education, Department of Orthopaedic and Accident Surgery, Queens Medical Center, Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|