Occupational allergy in saffron workers

A qualitative and quantitative comparison of Crocus sativus and Nigella sativa immunomodulatory effects

The present article reviews and compares the immunomodulatory activities of Crocus sativus (C. sativus) and Nigella sativa (N. sativa) and their main bioactive compounds. Immunomodulatory effects of these plants, especially with respect to Th1 and Th2 cytokines, are discussed based on relevant articles, books, and conference papers published in English until the end of April 2020, that were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. C. sativus and its constituents increase immunoglobulin (Ig-)G, interleukin 2 (IL)-2, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio, but decreased IgM, IL-10 and IL-4 secretion. N. sativa extract and thymoquinone reduce the levels of IL-2, -4, -10, and -12, while enhance IFN-γ and serum IgG1 and 2a. The reviewed articles indicate that C. sativus and N. sativa and their constituents could be potentially considered promising treatments for disorders associated with immune-dysregulation such as asthma and cancer.

New allergens from spices in the Apiaceae family: anise Pimpinella anisum L. and caraway Carum carvi L

Spices are gaining popularity in individual consumption, food industry, and medicine. While the incidence of allergies is constantly rising, those caused by consumption of herbs and spices are relatively rare. The allergic potential of spices added to many dishes and products is dangerous, as consumers may ingest them unknowingly. At particular risk are persons allergic to both birch and mugwort pollen because of cross-reactivity to proteins similar to birch allergen, Bet v 1 and profilins, who often exhibit a clinical condition termed “mugwort-celery-spice syndrome”.

The aim of our research was to analyze the extracts of anise and caraway for the presence of major pan-allergens, such as Bet v 1 analogues and profilins. Secondly, we analyzed the prevalence of reactions towards these pan-allergens among patients sensitive to spices. Finally, we tried to identify some of the previously unidentified allergenic proteins in these spices.

In order to identify Bet v 1 analogues and profilins in anise and caraway, we conducted immunoblotting of the proteins extracted from the spices with anti-Bet v 1 and anti-profilin antibodies.

The identification of new allergens was performed by initial selection of proteins through immunoblotting with sera of patients sensitive to spices. The proteins were subsequently characterized with LC-MS/MS.

The presence of Bet v 1 analogues and profilins in anise was confirmed and a new allergen, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, was identified. Moreover, new caraway allergens were found, including Bet v 1 analogue, profilin, and elongation factor α.

A Snapshot on Food Allergies: A Case Study on Edible Flowers

This perspective study addresses the main causes of adverse reactions to foods in humans, by taking into account the main allergic reactions that may occur as a result of food ingestion, as well the main allergens present in food and how their allergenicity change as a result of food preparation. In addition, European legislation on food labeling and novel foods was taken into account. The case study of this perspective is on the potential allergenicity of edible flowers as well as evidence of phytochemistry and toxic compounds and the risk associated with their ingestion. Regarding edible flowers, a key issue to address is if they are safe to consume or not. In the framework of the project “Innovative activities for the development of the cross-border supply chain of the edible flower” (ANTEA), we considered 62 different species and varieties of edible flowers. The results obtained by consulting two databases on allergens, COMPRISE and Allergen Nomenclature, marked two alerts for two species of edible flowers selected in the project. Moreover, based on edible flower consumption, about ten grams per serving, and on their protein content, we can also state that the risk of allergic reactions due to edible flower ingestion is very low.

Efficacy and Safety of Saffron Supplementation: Current Clinical Findings

Saffron (Crocus savitus) is a Middle-Eastern herb with strong antioxidant properties. Its major constituents, safranal, crocin, and crocetin, are also antioxidants and bear structural similarities to other well-known natural antixodant substances, such as zeaxanthin. Given the role of oxidative stress in many diseases, considerable interest has been shown into the potential role of saffron supplementation as a treatment for a range of diseases. In vitro and animal studies have provided evidence that saffron and its constituents may be potent therapies for a range of pathologies, including Alzheimer's disease, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and cardiac ischemia. Whether these findings translate into clinical efficacy, however, has as of yet been incompletely assessed. This makes assessing the role of saffron supplementation in these diseases difficult. Here, we review the current human clinical evidence supporting saffron supplementation as a treatment for a range of pathologies and the underlying science supporting its use.

Major allergen from Amaranthus palmeri pollen is a profilin: Isolation, partial characterisation and IgE recognition

BACKGROUND

Pollens represent a rich source of proteins that are also potential elicitors of IgE-mediated pollen allergy. Sensitisation to panallergens could play an important role in diagnosis and specific immunotherapy, because these molecules are present in different plant pollens and plant foods and have marked structural similarity in different species. Profilins are one of the most common panallergens to be studied because they are responsible for a large number of sensitisations and are clearly related to cross-reactivity and co-sensitisation. This study aimed to isolate and characterise a new allergen of Amaranthus palmeri pollen and to determine its allergenicity.

METHODS

A. palmeri pollen profilin was purified using poly-l-proline-Sepharose affinity chromatography followed by anion exchanger chromatography. Identification of purified protein was carried out by mass spectrometry. Specific IgE was estimated in sera of patients with positive skin prick test to A. palmeri pollen extract, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Purified protein appeared as a single band at 14 kDa in SDS-PAGE gel. Mass spectrometric analysis of the gel band identified two highly conserved peptides corresponding to allergenic profilins from pollen of other plants. Sera from about 60% of allergic patients have IgE that recognises the purified A. palmeri protein.

CONCLUSION

A 14 kDa protein of A. palmeri pollen was purified and identified as allergenic profilin, which was recognised by sera from pollen allergic patients.

Occupational allergy to flowers: immunoblot analysis of allergens in freesia, gerbera and chrysanthemum pollen

High exposure to pollen from ornamental flowers can induce an IgE-mediated occupational allergy in florists and horticulture workers. We investigated IgE-binding antigens in chrysanthemum, freesia and gerbera pollen by immunoblot analysis and analysed the cross-reactivity of these pollen with birch, grass and mugwort pollen. In immunoblots with chrysanthemum pollen, major IgE-binding structures were seen with a molecular weight (MW) of approximately 25, 45 and 65 kD. In the immunoblots with freesia pollen, IgE from freesia pollen was directed against two proteins with an MW of approximately 15 kD. Most sera showed IgE binding to an approximately 15 kD band in gerbera pollen; with some sera additional bands were seen in the range of 30-50 kD. IgE binding to chrysanthemum pollen was inhibited by mugwort pollen only, whereas IgE binding to freesia pollen was suppressed by birch, grass and mugwort pollen. The inhibitory activity of birch and grass pollen extract on IgE binding to gerbera pollen extract was serum dependent and ranged from no inhibition to complete inhibition. Occupational exposure to many different flowers induced IgE against all three types of pollen. Exposure in greenhouses to gerbera flowers elicited mainly IgE against gerbera pollen. Mugwort pollen extract inhibited IgE binding to pollen from all three flowers.

Profilins: mimickers of allergy or relevant allergens?

Profilins are ubiquitous proteins, present in all eukaryotic cells and identified as allergens in pollen, latex and plant foods. The highly conserved structure justifies the cross-reactive nature of IgE antibodies against plant profilins and their designation as pan-allergens. Primary sensitization to profilin seems to arise from pollen sensitization with later development of cross-reactive IgE antibodies against plant food (and possibly latex) profilins. The role of profilin in inducing allergic symptoms needs to be evaluated and raises important issues in allergy diagnosis due to cross-reactivity. IgE cross-reactivity among profilins is associated with multiple pollen sensitization and with various pollen-food syndromes. In respiratory allergy, sensitization to pollen to which the patient has virtually no environmental exposure has been identified as a manifestation of profilin sensitization. As a food allergen, profilin usually elicits mild reactions, such as oral allergy syndrome, is not modified by processing and is especially important in allergy to some fruits, such as melon, watermelon, banana, tomato, citrus fruit and persimmon. Purified natural and recombinant profilins for in vitro and in vivo allergy tests are helpful in the diagnostic work-up. Herein we review the current state of knowledge about the allergen profilin and its implications in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic diseases. We conclude that, although its role in triggering allergic symptoms is still controversial, profilin is undoubtedly a relevant allergen. As a pan-allergen, profilin is associated with multiple pollen sensitization and pollen-food-latex syndromes that the allergist has to be aware of in order to accomplish an accurate diagnosis and successful treatment of allergic diseases.

The role of inhalant food allergens in occupational asthma

Workers handling food products and derivatives are at increased risk of developing occupational asthma. Exposure to food allergens occurs primarily through inhalation of dust, steam, vapors, and aerosolized proteins generated during cutting, scrubbing or cleaning, cooking or boiling, and drying activities. Suspicion of the diagnosis of occupational asthma should lead to proper investigation to confirm the diagnosis objectively. Most inhaled food allergy is IgE mediated, and skin prick tests or specific IgE tests are useful tools to support the diagnosis, but objective evidence of asthma by monitoring of peak expiratory flows at and off work or specific inhalation challenges offers a better diagnostic value. This article provides a list of the various foods, food additives, and contaminants that have been associated with occupational asthma.

Cloning and expression of the allergen Cro s 2 profilin from saffron (Crocus sativus)

BACKGROUND

Profilin is a panallergen that is recognized by IgE in allergic patients. Allergy to saffron (Crocus sativus) pollen has been described in people exposed to its pollen. Saffron contains a profilin that may cause allergic reactions in atopic subjects. The aim of this study was to describe the cloning, expression and purification of saffron profilin from pollen.

METHODS

Cloning of saffron profilin was performed by polymerase chain reaction using specific primers from saffron pollen RNA. Expression was carried out in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using a vector pET-102- TOPO. A recombinant fusion protein was expressed and the recombinant profilin was purified by metal precipitation. Immunological characterization was performed by immunoblotting experiments.

RESULTS

The 34kDa- recombinant saffron profilin, Cro s 2, as a fusion protein was purified. Immunoblotting tested with the sera of allergic patients showed a specific reaction with the recombinant Cro s 2 band.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequence of Cro s 2 showed a high degree of identity and similarity to other plant profilins and the recombinant saffron profilin, Cro s 2, may be used for target-specific diagnosis and structural analyses and investigation of cross reactivity of Cro s 2 with other plant profilins.

[Occupational rhinitis]

INTRODUCTION

Rhinitis is one of the most common occupational diseases. It is often neglected by those affected because it causes little disability. It is poorly understood by doctors who have insufficient experience of occupational diseases and their causes. However it is often the first manifestation of a respiratory disorder that may cause physical complications and socio-economic disability.

BACKGROUND

Numerous diverse agents are potential causes of rhinitis. The diagnosis of occupational rhinitis should be considered when sneezing, rhinorrhoea or nasal obstruction are associated with work. The causal agent can be identified by ta-king a careful history. When the mechanism of the disease is immunologic the suspected antigen can be confirmed by skin testing, specific IgE or nasal provocation. The respiratory disorder of which rhinitis is the first manifestation may progress to asthma if the exposure continues. The prevention of occupational rhinitis depends on the reduction of exposure to allergens and/or irritants. When it has developed removal of the causative agent is essential to prevent progression to asthma.

Rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma caused by corn plant (Dracaena fragrans)

BACKGROUND

Respiratory symptoms caused by decorative flowers have seldom been reported in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a housewife who experienced episodes of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and contact urticaria in relation to corn plant (Dracaena fragrans) in her home.

METHODS

Skin prick testing (SPT) was performed with extract from the leaves of D. fragrans and a standard battery of aeroallergens. An air sampler was installed close to the plant in her house. We performed skin, conjunctival, and bronchial provocation tests with the extract of D. fragrans. Serum specific IgE was measured using enzyme allergosorbent testing.

RESULTS

The patient showed positive SPT reactions to the D. fragrans extract at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL. Results of SPT with the extract prepared from the Air Sentinel filter were also positive. Skin provocation testing with the leaves of corn plant on the patient's forearm provoked dense wheal formation. The conjunctival provocation test response was positive to an antigen concentration of 0.05 mg/mL. The peak expiratory flow rate varied by 20% to 40% on exposure days and by 5% to 10% on nonexposure days. The bronchial provocation test response was positive to an antigen concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. Specific IgE to D. fragrans extract was 15.1 kUA/L.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings strongly suggest that an IgE-mediated immunologic mechanism is responsible for the patient's respiratory and cutaneous symptoms in relation to corn plant.

Coriander anaphylaxis in a spice grinder with undetected occupational allergy

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis after ingestion of spices as a result from occupational sensitization remains anecdotal. We describe a patient, working in a spice factory, with anaphylaxis from coriander in a meal. He also demonstrated urticaria, angio-edema, rhinoconjunctivitis and bronchospasm during handling coriander and fenugreek.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mechanism of the anaphylactic reaction and to evaluate cross-reactivity between both botanically unrelated spices.

METHODS

Investigations comprised quantification of total and specific IgE by Immuno-CAP FEIA, skin testing, basophil activation experiments by flow-assisted determination of CD63 expression in the patient and 3 healthy controls. Immuno-CAP inhibition experiments were applied to investigate cross-reactivity.

RESULTS

Specific IgE, skin tests and basophil activation tests were clearly positive in the patient, whereas they remained negative in controls. No cross-reactivity between fenugreek and coriander was demonstrable by inhibition experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestations in temporal relationship to ingestion of coriander and handling of coriander and/or fenugreek, the positive specific IgE results, skin tests and basophil activation assays support the diagnosis of allergy to both spices. History suggests sensitization by occupational exposure.

Allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopy among grape farmers in a rural population in Crete, Greece

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To measure the prevalence of allergic rhinitis, atopy, and asthma among grape farmers, and to compare the respiratory and atopic status in grape farmers with those of nonexposed control subjects.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Malevisi region in northern Crete, Greece.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty grape farmers and 100 control subjects living in the Malevisi region were examined. The protocol comprised a questionnaire, skin prick tests for 16 common allergens, measurement of specific IgE antibodies against 8 allergens, and spirometry before and after bronchodilation.

RESULTS

Grape farmers were found to have an excess of respiratory symptoms. The comparison with the control group, after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking status, showed that the differences were statistically significant for rhinorrhea (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 5.1; p < 0.001), sneezing (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0; p < 0.01), and nasal itching (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.6; p < 0.05), but were nonsignificant for asthma-related symptoms. In the multiple logistic regression model, grape farmers were found to have increased work-related symptoms, such as sneezing (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.6; p < 01), rhinorrhea (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.6; p < 0.01), cough (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 11.4; p < 0.05), and dyspnea (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; p < 0.05). The prevalence of allergic rhinitis was 40.8% in grape farmers and 26% in control subjects (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.5; p < 0.02). Increased but statistically nonsignificant values of asthma prevalence were found in grape farmers (6.7%) compared with the control group (2.0%). The prevalence of atopy was 64.2% in grape farmers and 38.0% in the control group (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5; p < 0.01). Mean FEV1 was significantly lower in grape farmers than in control subjects (p < 0.05), after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking status. Bronchial obstruction was reversible in 23 grape farmers (19.2%) and in 6 control subjects (6%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The study mainly demonstrated the high prevalence of allergic rhinitis and work-related respiratory symptoms in grape farmers compared to control subjects. It also suggested that grape farming is possibly associated with increased allergic sensitization to specific pollens, low baseline FEV1, and increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Further studies are needed to determine the potential risk factors for these disorders among the farming population.

Allergenic potency of spices: hot, medium hot, or very hot

Spices are the most attractive ingredients to confer an authentic taste to food. As they are derived from plants, they harbour allergenic potency and can induce symptoms ranging from mild local to severe systemic reactions. Due to the content of pharmacologically active substances of spices, the diagnosis of allergy and the differentiation from intolerance reactions may be difficult. Association with inhalative allergies via IgE cross-reactivity, but also direct gastrointestinal sensitization plays a role. This article is a botanical and allergological overview of the most important spices and molecules responsible for eliciting IgE-mediated reactions or cross-reactions. As no curative treatments are known at present, strict avoidance is recommended and, therefore, accurate labelling of pre-packed food is necessary.

Recombinant expression, purification and cross-reactivity of chenopod profilin: rChe a 2 as a good marker for profilin sensitization

Chenopod pollen is one of the major sources of allergens in some locations in the US, southern Europe and desert countries, and pollen profilin (Che a 2) is a major allergen. Recombinant Che a 2 (rChe a 2) has been produced in Escherichia coil cells with a final yield of 25 mg/l of cell culture. The expressed protein was isolated and structurally characterized by means of mass spectrometry, Edman degradation and circular dichroism. rChe a 2 displayed a molecular mass of 13 959 Da, which agrees with that of the amino acid sequence. The N-terminal amino acid sequence indicated the correct processing of the recombinant product. The immunological analysis of rChe a 2 showed IgG- and IgE-binding capabilities equivalent to those of its natural counterpart, Che a 2, isolated from the pollen. Inhibition experiments showed high cross-reactivity degrees with different allergenic sources. Inhibition degrees of >95% and >80% were obtained for chenopod profilin and, respectively, latex and pollen extracts, whereas 10-95% of inhibition was observed for different plant-derived foods. Due to its close relation to other allergenic profilins from pollens, plant-derived foods and latex, rChe a 2 could be a useful tool in clinical trials to detect profilin-allergic patients and perhaps, depending on its clinical relevance, in specific immunotherapy of these hypersensitive individuals.

The allergenic relevance of profilin (Ole e 2) from Olea europaea pollen

Many works have dealt with the study of the allergenic relevance of profilin from allergenic extracts, mainly derived from pollens and vegetable foods. Olive pollen extracts also contain a profilin allergen (Ole e 2). This protein has been characterized in detail, so the amino-acid sequence of three isoforms and the structural model of one of them are already known. The prevalence of Ole e 2 for olive allergenic patients has been evaluated by different in vivo and in vitro methods, and the results compared with those obtained for another pollen profilins.

Occupational airway sensitizers: an overview on the respective literature

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, there is rigorous scientific activity concerning the further development of work safety regulations involving airway-sensitizing substances. Technical directives on hazardous substances are enforced in several countries and are being continuously updated. The European Union has established a code for several occupational substances, now labeled R 42 ("may cause sensitization by inhalation").

METHODS

We present an overview of the literature dealing with allergic occupational asthma. The literature was selected according to criteria of study design and diagnostic test methods. Approximately 300 publications were reviewed including both epidemiological studies and individual case reports.

RESULTS

Airway sensitizers are systematically arranged and separately listed according to chemicals and their origin from animals, plants, and microorganisms. The clinical data as well as threshold limit values (TLV) and R 42 labeling of 250 airway-sensitizing substances are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common sensitizing substances causing occupational asthma were dust of cereal flours, enzymes, natural rubber latex, laboratory animals as well as low molecular substances such as isocyanates and acid anhydrides.

Quantification of profilins by a monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA

Profilins are plant allergens responsible for cross-reactivities in pollen and fruit-allergic patients. A two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay has been developed for the quantification of profilins and its suitability for quantifying profilin in different plant extracts has been evaluated. The assay is based on two profilin-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with different epitope specificities. These antibodies were immobilized on ELISA plates and incubated with samples containing profilin. Bound profilin was detected by a combination of biotinylated profilin-specific antiserum and peroxidase-streptavidin conjugate. The optimized ELISA measured profilin concentrations ranging from 4 to 250 ng/ml and could quantify profilins from plant species of a variety of different botanical families. No reactivity to mites, molds, or crustaceans was detected, suggesting that the immunoassay is plant-specific. The results indicate that this sensitive profilin-assay will be helpful both for quantifying the profilin content of allergenic extracts intended for clinical use and for studying cross-reactivities between pollen extracts.