Pulmonary infections increase exhaled nitric oxide in lung transplant recipients: a longitudinal study

Can Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Serve as a Clinical Indicator for Patients Hospitalized with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever?

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), a zoonotic disease spread by infected viruses, can be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in endemic areas. This prospective study aimed to establish the relationship between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels and clinical prognosis of CCHF. The study included 85 participants: 55 patients followed up for CCHF from May to August 2022, and 30 healthy controls. FeNO levels were measured upon hospital admission and were 7.6 ± 3.3 parts per billion (ppb) in patients with mild/moderate CCHF, 2.5 ± 2.1 ppb in patients with severe CCHF, and 6.7 ± 1.7 ppb in the healthy control group. There was no statistically significant difference in FeNO levels between the control group and patients with mild/moderate CCHF (P = 0.09), whereas patients with severe CCHF had lower FeNO levels than those in the control group and patients with mild/moderate CCHF (P < 0.001 for both). FeNO measurement may offer a noninvasive and easily applied approach for predicting the clinical course and prognosis of CCHF in the early stages of the disease.

Exhaled Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis: Recent Advances and New Challenges in Breathomics

Cancers, chronic diseases and respiratory infections are major causes of mortality and present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for health care. There is an unmet medical need for non-invasive, easy-to-use biomarkers for the early diagnosis, phenotyping, predicting and monitoring of the therapeutic responses of these disorders. Exhaled breath sampling is an attractive choice that has gained attention in recent years. Exhaled nitric oxide measurement used as a predictive biomarker of the response to anti-eosinophil therapy in severe asthma has paved the way for other exhaled breath biomarkers. Advances in laser and nanosensor technologies and spectrometry together with widespread use of algorithms and artificial intelligence have facilitated research on volatile organic compounds and artificial olfaction systems to develop new exhaled biomarkers. We aim to provide an overview of the recent advances in and challenges of exhaled biomarker measurements with an emphasis on the applicability of their measurement as a non-invasive, point-of-care diagnostic and monitoring tool.

Perioperative Exhaled Nitric Oxide as an Indicator for Postoperative Pneumonia in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on 183 Cases

Introduction

This study is conducted to investigate the correlation between perioperative fractional exhaled nitric oxide and postoperative pneumonia (POP) and the feasibility of perioperative FeNO for predicting POP in surgical lung cancer patients.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were prospectively analyzed, and the relationship between perioperative FeNO and POP was evaluated based on patients' basic characteristics and clinical data in the hospital.

Results

There were 218 patients enrolled in this study. Finally, 183 patients were involved in the study, with 19 of them in the POP group and 164 in the non-POP group. The POP group had significantly higher postoperative FeNO (median: 30.0 vs. 19.0 ppb, P < 0.001) as well as change in FeNO (median: 10.0 vs. 0.0 ppb, P < 0.001) before and after the surgery. For predicting POP based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, a cutoff value of 25 ppb for postoperative FeNO (Youden's index: 0.515, sensitivity: 78.9%, and specificity: 72.6%) and 4 ppb for change in FeNO (Youden's index: 0.610, sensitivity: 84.2%, specificity: 76.8%) were selected. Furthermore, according to the bivariate regression analysis, FEV1/FVC (OR = 0.948, 95% CI: 0.899–0.999, P=0.048), POD1 FeNO (OR = 1.048, 95% CI: 1.019–1.077, P=0.001), and change in FeNO (OR = 1.087, 95% CI: 1.044–1.132, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with occurrence of POP.

Conclusions

This prospective study revealed that a high postoperative FeNO (>25 ppb), as well as an increased change in FeNO (>4 ppb), may have the potential in detecting the occurrence of POP in surgical lung cancer patients.

Annual Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurements and Exacerbations in Severe Asthma

Purpose

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) reflects eosinophilic inflammation of the airways. However, the significance of longitudinal assessment of FENO, including its variability, in the clinical course of severe asthma remains unclear. The aim of this study is to examine the association between long-term changes in FENO and the development of exacerbations in severe asthma.

Patients and Methods

Among the severe asthma patients enrolled in the Hokkaido Severe Asthma Cohort Study, 100 patients with severe asthma who completed a 3-year follow-up in which FENO was measured annually were included. According to the FENO level at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years, the patients were classified into three groups: the sustained high group (≥50 ppb at all three visits), the sustained low group (<25 ppb at all three visits), and the intermediate group (other). Subjects in the intermediate group were further classified into two groups based on the median value of the coefficient of variation (CV) of FENO during the 3 years (high CV and low CV intermediate groups).

Results

The sustained high group experienced shorter exacerbation-free survival and more frequent exacerbations than the sustained low group (median number of exacerbation events, 3 vs 0, p = 0.01). In the intermediate group, the high CV group experienced shorter exacerbation-free survival than the low CV group, and the CV of FENO was an independent contributing factor to the development of exacerbations.

Conclusion

Persistence of FENO above 50 ppb over the years as well as the presence of large variations in FENO levels was associated with the development of exacerbations in patients with severe asthma.

Acute rejection

Despite induction immunosuppression and the use of aggressive maintenance immunosuppressive regimens, acute allograft rejection following lung transplantation is still a problem with important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. As well as causing early graft loss and mortality, acute rejection also initiates the chronic alloimmune responses and airway-centred inflammation that predispose to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), also known as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is a major source of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Cellular responses to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on the allograft have traditionally been considered the main mechanism of acute rejection, but the influence of humoral immunity is increasingly recognised. As with other several other solid organ transplants, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a well-accepted and distinct clinical entity in lung transplantation. While acute cellular rejection (ACR) has defined histopathological criteria, transbronchial biopsy is less useful in AMR and its diagnosis is complicated by challenges in the measurement of antibodies directed against donor HLA, and a determination of their significance. Increasing awareness of the importance of non-HLA antigens further clouds this issue. Here, we review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment of ACR and AMR in lung transplantation, and discuss future potential biomarkers of both processes that may forward our understanding of these conditions.

Is It Possible to Predict Pulmonary Complications and Mortality in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients from Pre-Transplantation Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels?

OBJECTIVE

Chemo/radiotherapy-induced free oxygen radicals and reactive oxygen derivatives contribute to the development of early and late transplantation-related pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. It has been proposed that an increase in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level indicates oxidative stress and inflammation in the airways. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the pre-transplantation FeNO levels in HSCT patients and to search for its role in predicting post-transplantation pulmonary complications and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HSCT patients were included in the study prospectively between October 2009 and July 2011. Pre-transplantation FeNO levels were measured with a NIOX MINO® device prior to conditioning regimens. All patients were monitored prospectively for post-transplantation pulmonary complications with medical history, physical examination, chest X-ray, and pulmonary function tests.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (33 autologous, 23 allogeneic) with mean age of 45±13 years were included in the study, among whom 40 (71%) were male. Pre-transplantation FeNO level of the whole study group was found to be 24±13 (mean ± standard deviation) parts per billion (ppb). The FeNO level in allogeneic HSCT recipients was 19±6 ppb while it was 27±15 ppb in autologous HSCT recipients (p=0.042). No significant correlation was found between the pre-transplantation chemotherapy and radiotherapy protocols and baseline FeNO levels (p>0.05). Post-transplantation pulmonary toxicity was identified in 12 (21%) patients and no significant relationship was found between baseline FeNO levels and pulmonary toxicity. The survival rate of the whole study group for 1 year after transplantation was 70%. No significant relationship was identified between baseline FeNO values and survival (FeNO 19±7 ppb in patients who died and 26±15 ppb in the survivors; p=0.114).

CONCLUSION

Pre-transplantation FeNO measurement does not seem to have a role in predicting post-transplantation pulmonary complications and mortality.

Application of nitric oxide measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a convenient, non-invasive method for the assessment of active, mainly Th2-driven, airway inflammation, which is sensitive to treatment with standard anti-inflammatory therapy. Consequently, FeNO serves as a valued tool to aid diagnosis and monitoring in several asthma phenotypes. More recently, FeNO has been evaluated in several other respiratory, infectious, and/or immunological conditions. In this short review, we provide an overview of several clinical studies and discuss the status of potential applications of NO measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma.

Serial monitoring of exhaled nitric oxide in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a marker of airway inflammation, is often elevated in lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) with acute rejection or infection. Isolated measurements in the setting of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome have been variable. We sought to assess the utility of serial FeNO in predicting chronic allograft dysfunction or the presence of acute rejection or infection.

METHODS

Eighty-six LTxRs underwent 325 serial FeNO measurements at an expiratory flow rate of 50 ml/s. The change in FeNO (ΔFeNO) between two measurements obtained during a stable state (ΔFeNO-SS) was compared with ΔFeNO, where the first measurement was taken during a stable state and the second during an unstable state (defined as a subsequent decline in FEV1 > 10% over 3 months [ΔFeNO-SU]) or an acute complication (acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis or acute infection [ΔFeNO-SAC]). The median follow-up time after the baseline FeNO was 10 (range 3 to 25) months.

RESULTS

ΔFeNO-SS in 117 FeNO pairs was similar to ΔFeNO-SU in 26 pairs (2.1 ± 3 ppb vs 2.3 ± 4 ppb; p = 0.2). ΔFeNO-SAC in 17 pairs was markedly increased (27 ± 20 ppb; p < 0.001 vs ΔFeNO-SS). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for ΔFeNO in detecting an acute complication was 0.93 (p < 0.001). By applying a cut-off of >10 ppb, the sensitivity and specificity was 82% and 100%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 97.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in FeNO may serve as a useful adjunct in the detection of acute complications after lung transplantation. In this limited analysis, ΔFeNO was not predictive of a subsequent decline in allograft function.

Pulmonary infection, and not systemic inflammation, accounts for increased concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide in patients with septic shock

Nitric oxide (NO) is a key mediator in the pathophysiology of septic shock that can be measured in exhaled breath. To assess whether a pulmonary infection itself or systemic inflammation is responsible for NO production, we determined exhaled NO in ventilated patients with respiratory and non-respiratory septic shock and compared it with the concentration in ventilated intensive care patients without systemic inflammation. In addition, the change of NO production over time and correlations with haemodynamic instability were evaluated. The controls without systemic inflammation, as witnessed by the absence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and low levels of interleukin-6, had similar concentrations of NO as the patients with non-respiratory septic shock. The respiratory sepsis patients exhaled more NO than the non-respiratory sepsis patients (p = 0.05), and a time dependent decline in time in both groups (p = 0.04). Exhaled NO did not correlate with markers of disease severity, systemic inflammation and haemodynamic instability. These data indicate that the infected lungs are the source of exhaled NO.

Breath biomarkers in diagnosis of pulmonary diseases

Breath analysis provides a convenient and simple alternative to traditional specimen testing in clinical laboratory diagnosis. As such, substantial research has been devoted to the analysis and identification of breath biomarkers. Development of new analytes enhances the desirability of breath analysis especially for patients who monitor daily biochemical parameters. Elucidating the physiologic significance of volatile substances in breath is essential for clinical use. This review describes the use of breath biomarkers in diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), lung cancer, as well as other pulmonary diseases. A number of breath biomarkers in lung pathophysiology will be described including nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and other hydrocarbons.

Update on exhaled nitric oxide in pulmonary disease

The ability to assess the inflammatory status of a patient's airway using a noninvasive method is the ideal situation for clinicians. Owing in part to the relationship between the levels of exhaled nitric oxide to inflammation and the ease of the technique, the measurement of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (F(E)NO) has achieved considerable attention, particularly with respect to asthma. A multitude of studies have shown that when measured in exhaled air, this unique molecule has the potential to have both diagnostic and therapeutic roles in the clinical setting for many pulmonary diseases. The incorporation of F(E)NO into asthma management and treatment algorithms may help shed further insight on the current control and future risk of patients. Research is ongoing to determine the biology and the benefits of the use of F(E)NO in respiratory conditions in addition to asthma. This review will briefly outline the pathophysiology of nitric oxide, the measurement of F(E)NO and the potential clinical uses of F(E)NO in asthma and a number of other respiratory diseases. Despite its promise, until further research is conducted, the use of F(E)NO cannot be recommended for routine clinical management of respiratory diseases at present, but should be considered as an adjuvant to help guide therapy in certain patients with asthma and in those with eosinophilic bronchitis.

Exhaled breath condensate pH in lung transplant recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

BACKGROUND

Assessment of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH is a promising method for investigating airway pathology. However, inaccurate measurement techniques may bias pH readings. In this longitudinal study, we tested whether development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplant recipients is associated with acidification of EBC.

METHODS

EBC was collected in 15 patients with BOS and 16 stable BOS-free patients during routine clinical visits. From nine BOS patients, samples were collected before and after the onset of BOS, as well. Twenty healthy nontransplant subjects served as controls. EBC pH was measured by the carbon dioxide gas standardization method.

RESULTS

EBC pH in patients with and without BOS and controls was similar (BOS group: 6.40±0.04, BOS-free group: 6.45±0.03; controls: 6.39±0.02; P>0.05). In patients who developed BOS during the follow-up, EBC pH before and after the onset of BOS was comparable (pre-BOS: 6.41±0.04 vs. post-BOS: 6.41±0.04; P>0.05). Coefficient of variation for repeated pH measurements in controls and subjects with and without BOS was 2.3%±0.3%, 2.0%±0.3%, and 1.7%±0.2%, respectively (P>0.05). Similarly, the limits of agreement for between-visit variability determined by the Bland-Altman test were comparable among the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that assessment of EBC pH is of limited value for the diagnosis of BOS.

[Role of exhaled nitric oxide in predicting steroid response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

Exhaled nitric oxide is the most extensively studied exhaled biomarker. In patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exhaled nitric oxide level appears to be normal or only slightly elevated. As exhaled nitric oxide is a good surrogate marker for eosinophilic airway inflammation and eosinophilic inflammation is steroid responsive, patients with elevated exhaled nitric oxide levels may benefit more from a short course of inhaled or systemic corticosteroid treatment. In acute exacerbation most studies report elevated exhaled nitric oxide levels that decrease along with treatment. More importantly, exhaled nitric oxide levels at exacerbation correlate with functional improvements after treatment suggesting the possibility of a role for exhaled nitric oxide in predicting the response to treatment. In conclusion, assessment of airway inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide may identify a subgroup of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that is likely to benefit from corticosteroid treatment.

Usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide to guide risk stratification for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

The aim of this study was to assess fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for the early diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation (LTX). 611 FeNO measurements in 166 consecutive patients were classified depending on BOS stage at the time of assessment and course during minimum follow-up of 3 months: (1) stable non-BOS, (2) unstable non-BOS, (3) stable BOS and (4) unstable BOS. Unstable course was defined as new onset of BOS≥1 or progression of BOS. FeNO before unstable course was significantly increased in comparison to their stable counterparts (non-BOS: 28.9 ± 1.2 ppb, n = 40 vs. 16.4 ± 0.8 ppb, n = 131 and BOS: 32.5 ± 1.3 ppb, n = 35 vs. 15.3 ± 0.8 ppb, n = 26; p = 0.01 each). Average time from FeNO reading to onset of deterioration was 117 ± 9 days in non-BOS and 136 ± 9 days in BOS patients. The positive and negative predictive value of FeNO >20 ppb for BOS was 69.0% and 96.9%, respectively. Serial measurements demonstrated significantly lower mean individual variation in stable recipients as compared to stable patients switching to unstable course (3.2 ± 0.3 ppb vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 ppb, p = 0.02). In particular, the excellent negative predictive value of persistently low FeNO readings for future BOS make FeNO assessments a useful tool for continuous risk stratification after LTX.

Exhaled carbon monoxide in airway diseases: from research findings to clinical relevance

Breath tests have gained increasing interest in recent years mainly driven by the unmet clinical need to monitor airway diseases and to obtain information of unravelled aspects of respiratory disorders. Carbon monoxide is present in the exhaled breath and has been suggested to reflect ongoing oxidative stress, even if there are some confounding factors limiting its clinical usefulness. Increased concentration of exhaled carbon monoxide has been demonstrated in different acute and chronic airway diseases including allergic rhinitis, asthma, bronchiectasis, and post transplant bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Although exhaled carbon monoxide might not prove as a clinically useful biomarker of airway diseases, its measurement has helped to understand the place of heme oxygenase activity in allergic and non-allergic airway diseases. The scope of this review is the exciting field of exhaled carbon monoxide in airway diseases.

Exhaled nitric oxide in diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases

The analysis of biomarkers in exhaled breath constituents has recently become of great interest in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of many respiratory conditions. Of particular interest is the measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in breath. Its measurement is noninvasive, easy and reproducible. The technique has recently been standardized by both American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. The availability of cheap, portable and reliable equipment has made the assay possible in clinics by general physicians and, in the near future, at home by patients. The concentration of exhaled nitric oxide is markedly elevated in bronchial asthma and is positively related to the degree of esinophilic inflammation. Its measurement can be used in the diagnosis of bronchial asthma and titration of dose of steroids as well as to identify steroid responsive patients in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In primary ciliary dyskinesia, nasal NO is diagnostically low and of considerable value in diagnosis. Among lung transplant recipients, FENO can be of great value in the early detection of infection, bronchioloitis obliterans syndrome and rejection. This review discusses the biology, factors affecting measurement, and clinical application of FENO in the diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases.

Exhaled leukotriene B4 in children with community acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The infiltrate in pneumonia is characterized by a large number of activated neutrophils, for which leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a strong chemotactic agent. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive technique for studying the lower airways. The present study was conducted to measure EBC LTB4 as a potential non-invasive marker of inflammatory response in community acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

Eighteen children with CAP and 17 healthy children were recruited (age 5-13). The CAP children underwent physical examination, chest X-ray, leukocyte count and C-reactive protein measurement. The CAP and the control children performed spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide measurement (FE(NO)) and EBC collection for LTB4 assessment. In the CAP children spirometry, FE(NO) and EBC collection were repeated twice over a 1-month follow-up.

RESULTS

LTB4 EBC concentrations were higher in children with CAP than in healthy controls (10 pg/ml [7.0-15.3] vs. 3 pg/ml [3.0-6.9], P = 0.001) and decreased after 1 week (3 pg/ml [3.0-7.2], P < 0.01) with no further change a month later. In the acute phase spirometry demonstrated a restrictive pattern that gradually improved later. No difference in FE(NO) levels was found between children with CAP and healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Exhaled LTB4 levels increase in CAP and return to normal after 1 week. EBC collection is feasible in children with CAP and may represent a new way to non-invasively monitor the lung's biological response to infections.

Variability of exhaled breath condensate pH in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Measurement of pH in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may represent a novel method for investigating airway pathology.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this longitudinal study was to assess the variability of EBC pH in stable lung transplant recipients (LTR).

METHODS

During routine clinical visits 74 EBC pH measurements were performed in 17 LTR. EBC pH was also measured in 19 healthy volunteers on four separate occasions. EBC pH was determined at standard CO2 partial pressure by a blood gas analyzer.

RESULTS

Mean EBC pH in clinically stable LTR and in controls was similar (6.38 +/- 0.09 vs. 6.44 +/- 0.16; p = nonsignificant). Coefficient of variation for pH in LTR and controls was 2.1 and 2.3%, respectively. The limits of agreement for between-visit variability determined by the Bland-Altman test in LTR and healthy volunteers were also comparable (-0.29 and 0.46 vs. -0.53 and 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the variability of EBC pH in stable LTR is relatively small, and it is similar to that in healthy nontransplant subjects.

Exhaled nitric oxide monitoring in COPD using a portable analyzer

BACKGROUND

The exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma. A very recent statement has suggested FeNO as potential outcome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recently, a new hand-held FeNO analyzer (NIOX MINO) has been developed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We have evaluated the NIOX MINO in COPD patients and monitored FeNO levels during 1-year assessment in the outpatient setting. Short-term variability in FeNO was compared using a NIOX MINO and a stationary chemiluminescence analyzer (NOA, Sensormedics) in healthy volunteers and COPD patients on two consecutive months. Long-term FeNO variability was assessed on a cohort of 70 COPD outpatients measuring FeNO for 1 year. The intra-individual FeNO coefficient of variation (eNOCoV) was taken as index FeNO long-term variability.

RESULTS

In COPD there were no significant differences between NIOX MINO and NOA FeNO values recorded at baseline and 1 month later. Ninety five percent limits of agreement between NIOX MINO and NOA were-2.7 and 1.9ppb with significant reliability (r=0.96, p<0.0001). Mean FeNO at baseline was 15.0+/-9.5ppb. Over the 1-year period the overall mean FeNO was 15.5+/-10.1ppb. The long-term eNOCoV was 33.9+/-16.4% (range 8.1-83.1%), and it was significantly associated with exacerbation rate (r=0.57, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

FeNO electrochemical hand-held analyzer is feasible in COPD showing good agreement with stationary chemiluminescence analyzer. COPD patients exhibit a wide range of FeNO levels and a high variability of FeNO over time, which was positively associated with the number of exacerbations.

Exhaled nitric oxide: independent effects of atopy, smoking, respiratory tract infection, gender and height

Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide is widely used in respiratory research and clinical practice, especially in patients with asthma. However, interpretation is often difficult, due to common interfering factors, and little is known about interactions between factors. We assessed the influences and interactions of factors such as smoking, respiratory tract infections and respiratory allergy concerning exhaled nitric oxide values, with the aim to derive a scheme for adjustment. We studied 897 subjects (514 females, 383 males; mean age+/-standard deviation 34.5+/-13.0 years) with and without respiratory allergy (allergic rhinitis and/or asthma), smoking and respiratory tract infection. Logarithmic nitric oxide levels were described by an additive model comprising respiratory allergy, smoking, respiratory tract infection, gender and height (p0.001 each), without significant interaction terms. Geometric mean was 17.5ppb in a healthy female non smoker of height 170cm, whereby respiratory allergy corresponded to a change by factor 1.50, smoking 0.63, infection 1.24, male gender 1.17, and each 10cm increase (decrease) in height to 1.11 (0.90). Factors were virtually identical when excluding asthma and using the category allergic rhinitis instead of respiratory allergy (n=863). Within each category formed by combinations of these different predictors, the range of residual variation was approximately constant. We conclude that the factors influencing exhaled nitric oxide, which we analyzed, act independently of each other. Thus, circumstances such as smoking and respiratory tract infection do not appear to affect the usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide, provided that appropriate factors for adjustment are applied.

Pulmonary infections after lung transplantation

A tüdőtranszplantáció napjainkban már rutinszerűen végzett beavatkozássá vált a végstádiumú parenchymás és vascularis tüdőbetegségekben. Az elmúlt két évtized során több mint 20 ezer tüdőtranszplantációt végeztek a világon. Az immunszuppresszív szerek fejlődésének eredményeként az életet veszélyeztető akut rejekciók száma jelentősen csökkent, az első éven belüli halálozás csupán 2%-át okozza. A legnagyobb arányban az infekciók felelősek a korai és a késői morbiditásért és mortalitásért. A posztoperatív első 30 napon belüli halálozás 21,2%-a, az első éven belüli halálozás 40%-a infekciós eredetű. Az első hónapban a betegek 35–70%-ánál bakteriális pneumónia alakul ki, amelynek kb. felét Gram-negatív pálcák okozzák, dominálóan Pseudomonas-törzsek. A betegek a műtétet követően antibiotikus profilaxisban részesülnek, amit aztán a donortüdőből kimutatott törzs rezisztenciatesztje alapján módosíthatunk. A korai posztoperatív időszakban az invazív gomba- (Aspergillus-, Candida-) és CMV-infekciók a 100 napig tartó inhalatív amphotericin és szisztémás valganciklovir-profilaxis hatására kevesebb mint 10–10%-ban lépnek fel. Számuk a profilaxis befejezte után emelkedik. A későbbiekben kialakuló bronchiolitis obliterans szindróma (BOS) szintén hajlamosít a fertőzésekre. Ennek jelentőségét az adja, hogy 5 évvel a műtét után a betegek kb. 50%-ánál detektálható a BOS. Az infekciók sikeres leküzdésének alapja a rutinszerűen, illetve a tünetek fellépte után minél hamarabb elvégzett kontroll (laboratóriumi, radiológiai, légzésfunkciós, köpet- és bronchoszkópos vizsgálatok), majd a célzott terápia bevezetése. A munka célja a tüdőtranszplantáltaknál jelentkező leggyakoribb infekciók klinikai manifesztációjának, diagnosztikájának és kezelésének áttekintése.

Exhaled nitric oxide and carbon monoxide in respiratory diseases

Breath tests have gained increasing interest in recent years mainly driven by the unmet clinical need to monitor airway diseases and to obtain information on unravelled aspects of respiratory disorders. A prototype of such measurement reaching clinical significance besides its use as a research tool is the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (NO). It took hardly more than a decade after the discovery that exhaled breath contains NO for this measurement to be approved for clinical practice to monitor anti-inflammatory treatment in asthma. Recent studies demonstrate that using exhaled NO measurement to guide anti-inflammatory treatment in asthma may help clinical decision making. A similarly small molecule present in exhaled breath is carbon monoxide, which is not only a biomarker of cigarette smoking but has also been suggested to reflect ongoing oxidative stress/antioxidant defense. The scope of this review is the exciting field of exhaled monoxides. Since several other biomarkers have also been studied in the exhaled breath this review will provide a brief introduction to them.

[Exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis and monitoring of lung diseases]

In recent 10 years there has been an explosion of interest in the analysis of breath constituents as a way of monitoring airway inflammation in lung diseases. Monitoring of inflammation may assist in differential diagnosis of lung diseases, assessment of their severity and response to appropriate treatment. Among these novel non-invasive methods, exhaled nitric oxide has been the most extensively studied. Its measurement has recently been standardized, and there are now commercially available nitric oxide analyzers. Concentration of exhaled nitric oxide is markedly elevated in asthma, and its elevation is positively related to the degree of eosinophilic airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness and symptoms. Furthermore, evidence suggests that exhaled nitric oxide-driven asthma treatment provides more precise asthma control compared to conventional treatment protocols. With regard to other lung diseases, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exhaled nitric oxide may be useful in predicting steroid responsiveness, while in lung transplant recipients its measurement could contribute to the detection of asymptomatic infections and rejection processes.