Our experience in liver transplantation in patients over 65 yr of age

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Demographic Trends in Liver Transplant Survivors After 3 Decades of Program Implementation: The Impact of Cohort and Period Effects on Life Expectancy

Background

Demographic analyses may reveal current patterns of change in the outcomes of rapidly developing medical procedures because they incorporate the period perspective.

Methods

We analyzed the changes in size, age structure, and hospitalizations in the population of liver transplantation (LT) survivors in our center during the last 30 y (n = 1114 patients) and generated projections, including life expectancy (LE), considering cohort and period effects. Life tables were used to project the complete LE (overall 1990-2020 experience), the cohort LE (according to the decade of surgery: 1990-2000, 2000-2010, and 2010-2020), and the period LE (current 2015-2020 experience).

Results

The population of LT recipients in follow-up continued to experience progressive growth and aging since 1990 (492 patients [41.9% >65 y] in 2020), and the magnitude of these phenomena may double in the next 30 y. However, the number of admissions and days of admission has been decreasing. The complete LE at LT was 12.4 y, whereas the period LE was 15.8 y. The cohort LE (limited to 10 y) was 5.3, 6.3, and 7.3 y for the 1990-2000, 2000-2010, and 2010-2020 cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions

The target population of our medical care after LT is growing and aging. The prevalence of both of these phenomena is expected to increase in the coming years and is associated with a current improvement in LE. However, the hospitalization burden associated with LT survivors is declining. The period effect should be considered for generating up-to-date information on these current trends, which are crucial when designing health policies for LT survivors.

Recipient age influences survival after liver transplant: Results of the French national cohort 2007-2017

BACKGROUND

In recent years, age at liver transplantation (LT) has markedly increased. In the context of organ shortage, we investigated the impact of recipient age on post-transplantation mortality.

METHODS

All adult patients who received a first LT between 2007 and 2017 were included in this cross-sectional study. Recipients' characteristics at the time of listing, donor and surgery data, post-operative complications and follow-up of vital status were retrieved from the national transplantation database. The impact of age on 5-year overall mortality post-LT was estimated using a flexible multivariable parametric model which was also used to estimate the association between age and 10-year net survival, accounting for expected age- and sex-related mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 7610 patients, 21.4% were aged 60-65 years, and 15.7% over 65. With increasing age, comorbidities increased but severity of liver disease decreased. Older recipient age was associated with decreased observed survival at 5 years after LT (p < .001), with a significant effect particularly during the first 2 years. The linear increase in the risk of death associated with age does not allow any definition of an age's threshold for LT (p = .832). Other covariates associated with an increased risk of 5-year death were dialysis and mechanical ventilation at transplant, transfusion during LT, hepatocellular carcinoma and donor age. Ten-year flexible net survival analysis confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

Although there was a selection process for older recipients, increasing age at LT was associated with an increased risk of death, particularly in the first years after LT.

Immunosuppression for older liver transplant recipients

Older liver transplant recipients have a lower risk of acute rejection than younger patients (9% for patients aged ≥65 years versus 23% for those aged 18-34 years) and are more vulnerable to immunosuppression-related complications. The number of liver transplant recipients ≥65 years has risen to 22% in Europe and the US, but limited information is available on the optimal immunosuppressive regimen for these patients. In this review, we discuss the appropriate management of immunosuppressive agents in older adults to minimize adverse events while avoiding acute rejection. The way the body processes drugs greatly depends on age. In the case of calcineurin inhibitor drugs, aging reduces hepatic metabolism, leading to changes in their pharmacokinetics. Corticosteroids also show decreased clearance as the patient ages. In severe cases of hypoalbuminemia, dose adjustment of mycophenolate acid derivatives may be necessary. However, the pharmacokinetic profiles of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, basiliximab, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin remain unaffected by age. Furthermore, age-related frailty may impact drug metabolism and require tailored interventions and closer follow-up. Although there is limited research, elderly liver transplant recipients require less immunosuppression with double or triple-agent regimens, lower exposure to calcineurin inhibitors, and a shorter course of corticosteroids. The usage of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in older transplant populations has not been specifically investigated, and thus their usage should align with indications for younger patient groups.

Effect of Age on Liver Transplantation Recipient Outcomes: Two Centers' Experience

BACKGROUND

Liver diseases epidemiology has changed with advances in perioperative care. Transplantation at large centers is favorable among older and younger recipients. Local limitations on transplantation for recipients older than 65 years were cancelled in 2014. This study evaluates the effects of age on the transplantation outcome of Israeli patients in the era after removal of the limitations on recipient age.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined prospective data on patients older than 18 years who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2019 at 2 transplantation centers. Patients were divided into 4 age groups (group 1: ≤59 years; group 2: 60-64 years; group 3: 65-69 years; and group 4: ≥70 years). Each group's associations of pretransplantation factors with outcome and survival were examined.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one recipients underwent 269 transplantations (mean age: 53 ± 12.61 y). There were 181 male (67.8%) and 88 female recipients (67.28%). Overall, 207 patients (79.6%) survived ≥12 months. One-year survival rates were 82.9%, 73.2%, 71.4%, and 93.8% for groups 1 to 4, respectively (not statistically significant; P = .11). One-year graft survival was similar between groups. More patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, or ischemic heart disease tended to survive <12 months. Cardiovascular complication was more common in older groups and affected survival.

CONCLUSION

Patient age alone should not be used to deny access to transplantation, which could benefit older nonfrail individuals. However, risk factors such as male sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and concomitant kidney-liver transplantation should be carefully considered.

Prädiktoren für erfolgreiche Lebertransplantationen und Risikofaktoren

Die Lebertransplantation ist die einzige kurative Therapieoption einer chronischen Leberinsuffizienz im Endstadium. Daneben stellen onkologische Lebererkrankungen wie das HCC eine weitere Indikation für die Lebertransplantation dar, ebenso wie das akute Leberversagen.

Seit der ersten erfolgreichen Lebertransplantation durch Professor Thomas E. Starzl im Jahr 1967 haben sich nicht nur die chirurgischen, immunologischen und anästhesiologischen Techniken und Möglichkeiten geändert, sondern auch die Indikationen und das Patientengut. Hinzu kommt, dass die Empfänger ein zunehmendes Lebensalter und damit einhergehend mehr Begleiterkrankungen aufweisen.

Die Zahl an Lebertransplantationen ist weltweit weiter ansteigend. Es benötigen aber mehr Menschen eine Lebertransplantation, als Organe zur Verfügung stehen. Dies liegt am zunehmenden Bedarf an Spenderorganen bei gleichzeitig weiter rückläufiger Zahl postmortaler Organspenden.

Diese Diskrepanz zwischen Spenderorganen und Empfängern kann nur zu einem kleinen Teil durch Split-Lebertransplantationen oder die Leberlebendspende kompensiert werden.

Um den Spenderpool zu erweitern, werden zunehmend auch marginale Organe, die nur die erweiterten Spenderkriterien („extended donor criteria [EDC]“) erfüllen, allokiert. In manchen Ländern zählen hierzu auch die sogenannten DCD-Organe (DCD: „donation after cardiac death“), d. h. Organe, die erst nach dem kardiozirkulatorischen Tod des Spenders entnommen werden.

Es ist bekannt, dass marginale Spenderorgane mit einem erhöhten Risiko für ein schlechteres Transplantat- und Patientenüberleben nach Lebertransplantation einhergehen.

Um die Qualität marginaler Spenderorgane zu verbessern, hat sich eine rasante Entwicklung der Techniken der Organkonservierung über die letzten Jahre gezeigt. Mit der maschinellen Organperfusion besteht beispielsweise die Möglichkeit, die Organqualität deutlich zu verbessern. Insgesamt haben sich die Risikokonstellationen von Spenderorgan und Transplantatempfänger deutlich geändert.

Aus diesem Grunde ist es von großer Bedeutung, spezifische Prädiktoren für eine erfolgreiche Lebertransplantation sowie die entsprechenden Risikofaktoren für einen schlechten postoperativen Verlauf zu kennen, um das bestmögliche Transplantat- und Patientenüberleben nach Lebertransplantation zu ermöglichen.

Diese Einflussfaktoren, inklusive möglicher Risiko-Scores, sollen hier ebenso wie die neuen technischen Möglichkeiten in der Lebertransplantation beleuchtet werden.

Liver Transplantation in Sexagenarian Patients Using Grafts From Uncontrolled Circulatory Death Versus Grafts From Brain Death Donation

BACKGROUND

An increased number of older recipients underwent liver transplantation in recent years, and consequently needing to obtain more liver grafts. In order to increase this pool, in 2006, we initiated the use of livers from uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD). We analyzed the use of uDCD livers in sexagenarian recipients and their effect on overall survival.

METHODS

A retrospective and comparative study was performed among 4 groups according to recipient age (less or greater than 60 years) and donor type (donor brain death [DBD] or uDCD): Group A: DBD livers in recipients aged <60 years (n = 169); Group B: uDCD livers in recipients aged <60 years (n = 36); Group C: DBD livers in recipients aged >60 years (n = 96); and Group D: uDCD livers in recipients aged >60 years(n = 39).

RESULTS

Intraoperative transfusion, biliary complications, primary non-function, acute rejection, chronic renal dysfunction, retransplantation, and mortality during follow-up (cardiovascular diseases in 3 patients, hepatitis C virus recurrence in 4 patients, and de novo malignancies in 3 patients) were significantly higher, and 5-year patient and graft survival was significantly lower in sexagenarian recipients. Bilirubin and packed red blood cells transfusion were risk factors for patient survival, whereas hepatocelular carcinoma, creatinine, and packed red blood cells transfusion were risk factors for patient survival. Recipient age (<60 years) was confirmed as protective factor for patient and graft survival, whereas the use of uDCD was not a risk factor for patient or graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a uDCD liver did not demonstrate as a risk factor for patient and graft survival, and recipient age (<60 years) was a protective factor for patient and graft survival.

The impact of advanced patient age in liver transplantation: a European Liver Transplant Registry propensity-score matching study

BACKGROUND

The futility of liver transplantation in elderly recipients remains under debate in the HCV eradication era.

METHODS

The aim was to assess the effect of older age on outcome after liver transplantation. We used the ELTR to study the relationship between recipient age and post-transplant outcome. Young and elderly recipients were compared using a PSM method.

RESULTS

A total of 10,172 cases were analysed. Recipient age >65 years was identified as an independent risk factor associated with reduced patient survival (HR:1.42 95%CI:1.23-1.65,p < 0.001). After PSM, 2124 patients were matched, and the same association was found between elderly recipients and patient survival and graft survival (p < 0.001). As hepatocellular carcinoma and alcoholic cirrhosis were independent prognostic factors for patient and graft survival a propensity score-matching was performed for each. Patient and graft survival were significantly worse (p < 0.05) in the alcoholic cirrhosis elderly group. However, patient and graft survival in the hepatocellular carcinoma cohort were similar (p > 0.05) between groups.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation is an acceptable and safe curative option for elderly transplant candidates, with worse long-term outcomes compare to young candidates. The underlying liver disease for liver transplantation has a significant impact on the selection of elderly patients.

The impact of older age on long term survival in living donor liver transplantation: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of the end-stage liver disease in the elderly patients indicating a liver transplantation (LT) has been increasing. There is no universally accepted upper age limit for LT candidates but the functional status of older patients is important in pre-LT evaluation. This study aimed to examine the impact of older age on survival after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHOD

A total of 171 LDLT recipients were assessed in two groups: age ≥65 and < 65. To eliminate selection bias propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and 56 of 171 recipients were included in this study.

RESULTS

There were 20 recipients in the older group and 36 in the younger. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 65.0%, 60.0%, and 60.0% in group 1; 88.9%, 84.7%, and 71.4% in group 2, respectively. The 1-year survival was significantly lower in the older recipients; however, overall survival rates were similar between the groups. Of the 56 recipients, 15 (27%) deaths were observed in overall, and 11 (20%) in 1-year follow-up. The univariate regression analysis after PSM revealed that MELD score affected 1- year survival and the multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥65 years and MELD score were the predictors of 1-year survival.

CONCLUSION

At first sight, before PSM, survival appeared to be worse for older recipients. However, we have shown that there were confounding effects of clinical variables in the preliminary evaluation. After the elimination of this bias with PSM, This study highlights that older recipients have similar outcomes as youngers in LDLT for long-term survival.

Evaluation of rejection, infection, and malignancy outcomes in elderly liver transplant recipients receiving a similar level of immunosuppression compared to a younger group

Elderly liver transplant (LTx) recipients at a lower risk of acute rejection compared to younger recipients due to immunosenescence. As such, they may benefit from reduced immunosuppression (IS) to minimize infectious and malignant complications. We aimed to evaluate outcomes in LTx recipients ≥60 years compared to a younger group of LTx recipients aged 18-59 years maintained on a similar level of IS. This was a single-center retrospective evaluation of adult LTx recipients from 2013 to 2018 who received methylprednisolone induction and were maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and a prednisone taper. A total of 143 LTx recipients were evaluated. Mean age in the older group was 65 ± 3.8 compared to 49 ± 10.4 years in the younger group (p < 0.0001). Mean tacrolimus levels and the duration of MMF and steroids were comparable. Both groups had a similar incidence of first rejection within 1 year (19.2% in the elderly group vs. 23.1% in the younger group, p = 0.57). There were no statistical difference in terms of infection, malignancy, or patient survival. In conclusion, our data suggests that elderly LTx recipients, when treated with a similar level of IS, had similar 1 year incidence of rejection, infection, malignancy, and patient survival as younger LTx recipients.

Recommendations for Donor and Recipient Selection and Risk Prediction: Working Group Report From the ILTS Consensus Conference in DCD Liver Transplantation

Although the utilization of donation after circulatory death donors (DCDs) for liver transplantation (LT) has increased steadily, much controversy remains, and no common acceptance criteria exist with regard to donor and recipient risk factors and prediction models. A consensus conference was organized by International Liver Transplantation Society on January 31, 2020, in Venice, Italy, to review the current clinical practice worldwide regarding DCD-LT and to develop internationally accepted guidelines. The format of the conference was based on the grade system. International experts in this field were allocated to 6 working groups and prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. Working group members and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and recommendations provided by working group 2, covering the entire spectrum of donor and recipient risk factors and prediction models in DCD-LT.

Impact of donor age on liver transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the SRTR database

Background

Donor age is an important predictor for liver transplant recipients. Studies have not fully explored its impact on transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients as well as its involvement in tumor recurrence.

Methods

HCC patients who received liver transplants during 2010–2017 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were included. The recipients were divided into four groups based on donor age: I (≤ 34 years), II (35–49 years), III (50–64 years), and IV (≥ 65 years). Transplant outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), tumor recurrence, and risks, were evaluated.

Results

A total of 13,276 HCC recipients were included in this study. Statistical significant differences were observed in OS among the four groups. The best 5-year survival was 76.0% in group I, followed by 73.5% in group II, 72.8% in group III, and 69.2% in group IV (P < 0.001). However, the liver-specific survival did not differ among these groups (P = 0.260). Donor age was found to be the independent predictor of OS after adjusting for other variables (P < 0.001, ref. group I; 1.087 (0.979–1.208) for group II, P = 0.119; 1.124 (1.015–1.246) for group III, P = 0.025; 1.395 (1.215–1.602) for group IV, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, OS was significantly different in recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but there was no significant difference for recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic liver diseases and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The post-transplant cumulative tumor recurrence rates were similar among the four groups (P = 0.382).

Conclusions

Older donor age was associated with decreased OS but not liver-specific survival as well as post-transplant tumor recurrence in HCC recipients. Donor age also had different effects in patients with different underlying liver diseases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01786-6.

Outcomes of pancreas transplantation in older versus younger recipients: a comparative analysis

PURPOSE

The feasibility of pancreas transplantation (PT) in older recipients remains a matter of debate. We examined the influence of recipient age on PT outcomes and identified the prognostic factors for older recipients.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of PT in recipients aged < 50 years (younger group; n = 285) with those in recipients aged ≥ 50 years (older group; n = 94). Prognostic factors in the older group were analyzed by a logistic regression model and the influence of recipient age on survival outcomes were analyzed using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The patient survival rate was significantly worse in the older group (P < 0.001). Patient death from infection or/and multiple organ failure or cardiac/cerebrovascular events was also more frequent in the older group than in the younger group (P = 0.012 and P = 0.045, respectively). A longer duration of diabetes was an independent risk factor of 1-year mortality in the older group. In a propensity score-matched comparison, the older recipients (n = 77) had significantly poorer survival than the younger recipients (n = 77) (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

PT should be considered with appropriate caution, especially for older recipients with a long duration of diabetes.

Changing Trends in Liver Transplantation: Challenges and Solutions

Despite improvements in postliver transplant outcomes through refinements in perioperative management and surgical techniques, several changing trends in liver transplantation have presented challenges. Mortality on the waitlist remains high. In the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom, there is an increasing need for liver transplantation, primarily as a result of increased incidence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis and cancer indications. Meanwhile, donor suitability has decreased, as donors are often older and have more comorbidities. Despite a mismatch between organ need and availability, many organs are discarded. Notwithstanding this, many solutions have been developed to overcome these challenges. Innovative techniques in allograft preservation, viability assessment, and reconditioning have allowed the use of suboptimal organs with adequate results. Refinements in surgical procedures, including live donor liver transplantations, have increased the organ pool and are decreasing the time and mortality on the waitlist. Despite many challenges, a similar number of solutions and prospects are on the horizon. This review seeks to explore the changing trends and challenges in liver transplantation and highlight possible solutions and future directions.

Development of a predictive nomogram for early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Background

An individual prognostic model that includes inflammation caused by the delayed recovery of liver function after surgery for the early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver transplantation (LT) has not been well determined. Our aim was to develop a nomogram model for predicting individual survival and early recurrence following LT for patients.

Methods

Retrospective data, including clinical pathology and follow-up data, on HCC patients were collected between October 2016 and October 2019 at Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University. A nomogram estimating recurrence post-transplantation was constructed using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 210 patients were included in the present study. The multivariate estimators of recurrence consisted of age, maximum tumor diameter, tumor thrombus, microvascular invasion (MVI), alanine aminotransferase and alpha-fetoprotein on postoperative day 7. Nomogram of recurrence-free survival was developed. The calibration and discrimination of the novel model were assessed with the calibration curves and concordance index (C-index). Its reliability and advantages were evaluated by comparing it with the conventional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system using integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI). In comparison to the AJCC 8th edition staging system, the C-index (development set: 0.796 vs. 0.643, validation set: 0.741 vs. 0.563), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set (1-year AUC: 0.732 vs. 0.586, 2-year AUC: 0.705 vs. 0.504), the development set (1-year AUC: 0.799 vs. 0.551, 2-year AUC: 0.801 vs. 0.512), and this model’s calibration plots all showed improved performance. In addition, NRI and IDI verified that the nomogram is an accurate prognostic tool. Subsequently, a web calculator was generated to assess the risk of tumor recurrence post-LT.

Conclusions

The nomogram, based on clinical and pathological factors, showed good accuracy in estimating prognostic recurrence and can be used to guide individual patient follow-up and treatment.

Access to Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does Candidate Age Matter?

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) offers an effective alternative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its growing acceptance and longer life expectancy rates, survival data in older patients are conflicting and consensus guidelines are lacking in terms of a cut-off age range for operations.

STUDY DESIGN

We explored our prospectively maintained institutional database to identify patients diagnosed with HCC between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2019. Long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed in patients undergoing LT or hepatic resection, with patient age considered as the primary variable.

RESULTS

In total, 1,629 patients with HCC were identified, of whom 700 were considered for curative operations (LT, n = 538; resection, n = 162). Patients older than 65 years were less likely to be considered for LT (p < 0.01), although there were no age-related differences in the de-listing rate among age groups (p = 0.90). Older patients had overall survival (OS) outcomes comparable with younger patients after LT (3-year OS: 85.5% vs 84%; 5-year OS: 73.9% vs 77%; p = 0.26). Long-term survival was lower in the group who underwent resection, however, older patients still demonstrated equivalent OS outcomes (3-year OS: 59% vs 64.8%; 5-year OS: 44.8% vs 49%; p = 0.13). There were no differences in the development of local or distant metastatic disease between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although older candidates were less likely to be considered for LT in the management of HCC, judicious matching can lead to OS data comparable with their younger counterparts. Previous age misconceptions need to be challenged without the concern of worse long-term oncologic outcomes after surgery.

Living Donor Liver Transplant in Patients Aged 60 Years or Older: Experience from a Large Volume Centre in India

BACKGROUND

With ageing population and higher prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in older patients, more and more living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) are being considered in this group of patients as eligibility for deceased donor liver transplant is restricted to those aged 65 years and younger. However, the short- and long-term outcomes of this group have not been reported from India, which does not have a robust national health scheme. The aim of this study was to provide guidelines for transplant in this group.

METHODS

All patients aged 60 years and older (group 1) who underwent LDLT in our centre between January 2006 and December 2017 were studied. A propensity score-matched group in 1:2 ratio was created with comparable sex and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (group 2). The 2 groups were compared for duration of hospital stay, surgical complications, hospital mortality and 1-, 3- and 5-year survival.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 207 patients, and group 2 had 414 patients. The number of patients in group 1 gradually increased with time from 4 in 2006 to 33 in 2017 accounting for 15% of total cases. Group 1 had more patients with viral hepatitis, NASH and HCC, and they had a higher 30-day mortality due to cardiorespiratory complications. Although 1- and 3-year survival was similar, the 5-year survival was significantly lower in group 1.

CONCLUSION

Five-year survival was lower in the elderly group due to cardiorespiratory complications and recurrence of HCC. Outcomes in the elderly group can be improved with better patient selection and preventing HCC recurrence.

Liver transplantation and aging

An increase in the average life expectancy, paralleled by a demographic shift in the population with end-stage liver disease lies behind the rising demand for liver transplantation (LT) among the elderly. Some of the most common indications for LT including hepatocellular carcinoma, alcohol-related liver disease, chronic hepatitis C and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease tend to affect older patients. Transplant professionals are faced with an increasing demand for LT among elderly patients in an age of organ shortage and it is important that risk and benefits are carefully weighed in order to achieve the optimum use of precious liver grafts.

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with liver transplant

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to describe characteristics of liver transplant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) as well as in-hospital outcomes including the mortality and peri-procedural complications from the largest publicly available inpatient database in the United States from 2002 to 2014.

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of PCI are well studied in patients with end-stage liver disease but not well studied in patients who receive liver transplant (LT).

METHODS

Data derived from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were analyzed for years 2002-2014. Adult Hospitalizations with PCI were identified using ICD-9-CM procedure codes. LT status and various complications were identified by using previously validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Endpoints were in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. Propensity match analysis was performed to compare the endpoints between two groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8,595,836 patients underwent PCI; 4,080 (0.04%) patients had prior LT status. 93% of patients were above age 59 years, 79% were males and 69% were nonwhites. Out of the total patients with LT status, 73% had hypertension, 57% had diabetes mellitus, and 47% had renal failure. Post-PCI complications were studied further in both liver and non-LT patients after 1:1 propensity match which showed the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in LT group (12.3 vs 10.7%, p = .024) but dialysis requiring AKI was similar.

CONCLUSION

Among the LT recipients undergoing PCI, majority were nonwhite males. Almost more than half of the recipients had diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Incidence of AKI was higher in LT group, but other peri-procedural complications were comparable.

Recipient Age for Liver Transplantation: Should It Be Limited? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of a Large European Series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The demand for older patients not to be denied access to liver transplantation (LT) has intensified as the European population continues to live longer and maintains better health.

AIM

This study aims to ascertain the impact of recipient age on the post-LT survival in 2 well-balanced populations at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital.

METHODS

From January 1990 to December 2016, LT recipients (young group: 50-65 years of age; elderly group: >65 years of age) were compared by means of a propensity score matching (PSM) method.

RESULTS

Prior to PSM, graft survival and patient survival were worse for the elderly group (P < .001). In 1126 LT recipients, a caliper width of 0.01 was used based on the donor (age, sex, cause of donor death, and donor intensive care unit stay) and recipient covariates (sex, body mass index, indication for LT, intraoperative blood transfusion, cardiovascular risk factors, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD]-Era). After PSM, 206 patients were matched; 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 77%, 63%, and 52% vs 80%, 64%, and 45% (P = .50) for young vs elderly recipients, respectively. Similar graft survival rates were observed in both groups (P = .42).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age alone should not exclude patients from LT.

Liver transplantation in elderly patients: what do we know at the beginning of 2020?

An aging population has prompted us to evaluate the indications of liver transplantation (LT) in elderly patients more frequently. In this review, we summarize the short- and long-term results after LT in elderly patients and also discuss the criteria used to select patients and how recipient age can challenge current allocation systems. Briefly, the feasibility and early outcomes of LT in elderly patients compare favorably with those of younger patients. Although long-term survival is less than satisfactory, large-scale studies show that the transplant survival benefit is similar for elderly and younger patients. Therefore, age alone does not contraindicate LT; however, screening for cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and asymptomatic malignancies, evaluating nutritional status, and frailty, is crucial to ensure optimal results and avoid futile transplantation.

The aged liver: Beyond cellular senescence

The aging of the population, the increased prevalence of chronic liver diseases in elderly and the need to broaden the list of potential liver donors enjoin us to better understand what is an aged liver. In this review, we provide a brief introduction to cellular senescence, revisit the main morphological and functional modifications of the liver induced by aging, particularly concerning metabolism, immune response and regeneration, and try to elude some of the signalling pathways responsible for these modifications. Finally, we discuss the clinical consequences of aging on chronic liver diseases and the implications of older age for donors and recipients in liver transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in older adults: A comprehensive review by Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology

Given the prevalence and the rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in older adults worldwide, there is an urgent need to improve our understanding of the implications of treatment modalities in this population. The care of older patients with HCC is challenging due to the lack of evidence-based recommendations in this population. The current treatment approach for older patients relies on extrapolation of data from clinical trials conducted mostly in younger patients or fit older adults. Further, in the last few years, the arsenal of systemic treatments has increased with currently seven FDA-approved therapies available for patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, understanding how to apply current data to this unique and diverse patient population is necessary. This review will aim to shed light on the approach to older adults with HCC through an assessment of available data in the literature.

Age and liver transplantation

The average age of liver transplant donors and recipients has increased over the years. Independent of the cause of liver disease, older candidates have more comorbidities, higher waitlist mortality and higher post-transplant mortality than younger patients. However, transplant benefit may be similar in older and younger recipients, provided older recipients are carefully selected. The cohort of elderly patients transplanted decades ago is also increasingly raising issues concerning long-term exposure to immunosuppression and aging of the transplanted liver. Excellent results can be achieved with elderly donors and there is virtually no upper age limit for donors after brain death liver transplantation. The issue is how to optimise selection, procurement and matching to ensure good results with elderly donors. The impact of old donor age is more pronounced in younger recipients and patients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score. Age matching between the donor and the recipient should be incorporated into allocation policies with a multistep approach. However, age matching may vary depending on the objectives of different allocation policies. In addition, age matching must be revisited in the era of direct-acting antivirals. More restrictive limits have been adopted in donation after circulatory death. Perfusion machines which are currently under investigation may help expand these limits. In living donor liver transplantation, donor age limit is essentially guided by morbidity related to procurement. In this review we summarise changing trends in recipient and donor age. We discuss the implications of older age donors and recipients. We also consider different options for age matching in liver transplantation that could improve outcomes.

Liver transplantation in elderly patients: a systematic review and first meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elderly recipients are frequently discussed by the scientific community but objective indication for this parameter has been provided. The aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence on liver transplantation for elderly patients to assess graft and patient survival.

METHODS

A literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was carried out from January 2000 to August 2018. Clinical studies comparing the outcomes of liver transplantation in adult younger (<65 years) and elderly (>65 years) populations were analyzed. The primary outcomes were patient mortality and graft loss rates. This review was registered (Number CRD42017058261) as required in the international prospective register for systematic review protocols (PROSPERO).

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included involving a total of 242,487 patients (elderly: 23,660 and young: 218,827) were included in this study. In the meta-analysis, the elderly group had patient mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.63; P = 0.09; I2 = 48%) and graft (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.81-1.47; P = 0.59; I2 = 12%) loss rates comparable to those in the young group.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients have similar long-term survival and graft loss rates as young patients. Liver transplantation is an acceptable and safe curative option for elderly transplant candidates.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare the survival benefits of surgical resection (SR) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, a total of 461 patients who underwent SR and 575 patients who underwent RFA were enrolled from 2004 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) and liver-cancer-specific survival (LCSS) comparisons were conducted between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Elderly patients with early-stage HCC had a lower rate of utilization of liver transplantation, and they were more likely to receive SR or RFA as their first-line treatment compared with younger patients (P < 0.05). In the whole cohort, the SR group had significantly better OS [RFA, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.680 (1.390, 2.031), P < 0.001] and LCSS (RFA, HR = 1.658 (1.327, 2.070), P < 0.001) than the RFA group. After PSM, the improved survival in the SR group was further confirmed (all P < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, according to patients' age (65-75, >75 years) and tumor size (≤3.0, 3.1-5.0 cm), the SR group still presented better OS and LCSS than the RFA group (all P < 0.05), except for those older than 75 years with tumors ≤3.0 cm (all P > 0.05), both before and after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies for elderly patients (≥65 years) with single HCC ≤5 cm should emphasize SR as the primary therapy, while RFA can be an alternative to SR for those> 75 years with single HCC ≤3 cm.

Medication adherence and rejection rates in older vs younger adult liver transplant recipients

A growing number of older adults are undergoing liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. In some settings, it is thought that adherence declines with age. This retrospective study examined adherence and clinical outcomes in older vs younger adult LT recipients. Medical records of adult LT recipients from 2009 to 2012 from a single urban center were reviewed. The medication level variability index (MLVI) was the predefined primary outcome, with nonadherence defined as MLVI >2.5. The secondary outcome was incidence of rejection. Outcomes were evaluated starting 1 year post-LT until 2015. A total of 42 of 248 patients were ≥65 at transplant. Older adults had significantly better adherence than younger ones (65%≥65 were adherent vs 42% younger adults; chi-square two-tailed P=.02). Survival analyses of rejection between age groups censored by time since transplant showed no difference among the four age groups (χ² =0.84, P=.84). Older age was not found to be a risk factor for reduced adherence or graft rejection in patients surviving at least 1 year post-LT.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients 70 Years or Older

INTRODUCTION

Previous published studies have shown that age is not a contraindication for deceased donor liver transplantation. The data about elderly recipient after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of the LDLT with recipients aged 70 years or older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2013, 469 patients underwent LDLTs. The clinical characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data, graft, and patients' survival of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. All recipients who were 70 years or older at the time of liver transplantation were indentified. The results were compared to the results of the patients younger than 70 years.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients (2%) 70 years or older. All patients received the right lobe of their donor in a standard technique. One patient died postoperatively because of pulmonary infection, and one patient died 6 months after the operation because of graft failure after cardiac infarction. The comorbidity score of these two patients were significantly higher compared to the other ten patients without any complications (8.5 vs. 4.6, P = 0.01). The 1-year and 3-year patient and graft survival was 84%. There were no significant differences in complications, hospital stay, perioperative mortality, or median survival compared to the younger group.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of the patients is small, our study emphasizes that LDLT of patients 70 years or older can be performed safely in patients without major comorbidities. Elderly patients with increased risk for postoperative complications should be excluded from LDLT.

Aging of Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients: Trends and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes, Post-Transplantation Outcomes, and Transplant-Related Survival Benefit

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Epidemiologic factors have generated increased demand for liver transplantation among older patients. We aimed to describe trends in age among liver transplant registrants and recipients and the effect of age on waitlist and post-transplantation outcomes and on transplant-related survival benefit.

METHODS

We obtained data from the United Network for Organ Sharing on adults who were listed for liver transplantation (N = 122,606) or underwent liver transplantation (N = 60,820) from 2002 to 2014 in the United States. Competing risks analysis was used to model waitlist outcomes and Cox proportional hazards analysis to model post-transplantation survival. These models were also used to estimate 5-year transplant-related survival benefit for different age groups, calculated as the difference between waitlist and post-transplantation life expectancy.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2014, the mean age of liver transplant registrants increased from 51.2 to 55.7 years, with a more prominent increase in hepatitis C virus-positive (50.9-57.9 years) than hepatitis C virus-negative (51.3-54.3 years) registrants. The proportion of registrants aged ≥60 years increased from 19% to 41%. In hepatitis C virus-negative patients, aging trends were driven by increasing proportions of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Among transplant registrants, increasing age was associated with increasing mortality before transplantation and decreasing likelihood of transplantation. Among transplant recipients, increasing age was associated with increasing post-transplantation mortality. There was little difference in 5-year transplant-related survival benefit between different age groups who had the same Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score.

CONCLUSIONS

Dramatic aging of liver transplant registrants and recipients occurred from 2002 to 2014, driven by aging of the hepatitis C virus-positive cohort and increased prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Increasing age does not affect transplant-related survival benefit substantially because age diminishes both post-transplantation survival and waitlist survival approximately equally.

Liver transplantation in older adults

Liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment therapy for end-stage liver disease. In the United States, approximately 15% of annual liver transplant recipients are 65 or older. The most common postoperative complications are infection, acute graft rejection, and acute renal failure. To prevent complications, recipients are treated with immunosuppressive medications and anti-infective agents. The long-term complications of liver transplantation are a consequence of long-term use of immunosuppressive medications and recurrence of the original disease in the liver. Nurses play a critical role in supporting and educating recipients and their primary support persons about post-transplant follow-up care, including laboratory test schedules, medication management, and infection prevention. Strict compliance with follow-up care provides the greatest possibility of avoiding complications or organ rejection.

Long-term results of liver transplantation for over 60 years old patients with hepatitis B virus-related end-stage liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related end-stage liver disease is the leading indication for liver transplantation in China, but long-term results of liver transplantation in patients aged over 60 years are not clear. The present study was to reveal the natural history of liver recipients with hepatitis B older than 60 years.

METHODS

The recipients who had received liver transplantation between December 2003 and December 2005 were divided into two groups: those equal or older than 60 years (older group, n=60) and those younger than 60 years (younger group, n=305). Risk factors for poor long-term outcome in patients aged over 60 years were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Except for age and preexisting chronic disease (P<0.05), no significant differences were observed in perioperative characteristics between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in HBV and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (P>0.05). The actuarial 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year survival rates were 81.6%, 71.6%, 66.7% and 63.3% respectively for the older group vs 84.9%, 77.7%, 70.8% and 65.6% for the younger group (P>0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that pre-liver transplant renal insufficiency was a risk factor for poor outcome in the older group (odds ratio=3.615, P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation is safe and feasible for patients with HBV-related end-stage liver disease aged over 60 years. Older patients with renal insufficiency should undergo transplantation earlier than younger patients.

Outcomes among older adult liver transplantation recipients in the model of end stage liver disease (MELD) era

BACKGROUND

Since 2002, the Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has been the basis of the liver transplant (LT) allocation system. Among older adult LT recipients, short-term outcomes in the MELD era were comparable to the pre-MELD era, but long-term outcomes remain unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the UNOS data on patients age ≥ 50 years who underwent primary LT from February 27, 2002 until October 31, 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 35,686 recipients met inclusion criteria. The cohort was divided into 5-year interval age groups. Five-year over-all survival rates for ages 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70+ were 72.2%, 71.6%, 69.5%, 65.0%, and 57.5%, respectively. Five-year graft survival rates after adjusting for death as competing risk for ages 50-54, 55-59,60-64, 65-69 and 70+ were 85.8%, 87.3%, 89.6%, 89.1% and 88.9%, respectively. By Cox proportional hazard modeling, age ≥ 60, increasing MELD, donor age ≥ 60, hepatitis C, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), dialysis and impaired pre-transplant functional status (FS) were associated with increased 5-year mortality. Using Fine and Gray sub-proportional hazard modeling adjusted for death as competing risk, 5-year graft failure was associated with donor age ≥ 60, increasing MELD, hepatitis C, HCC, and impaired pre-transplant FS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older LT recipients in the MELD era, long-term graft survival after adjusting for death as competing risk was improved with increasing age, while over-all survival was worse. Donor age, hepatitis C, and pre-transplant FS represent potentially modifiable risk factors that could influence long-term graft and patient survival.

It's a man's world: does orthotopic liver transplantation in the elderly male confer an additional risk on survival?

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in a well-selected population is a highly successful procedure, with one-year survival rates reported to be as high as 90%. Advanced age is considered to be a contraindication. Survival rates in patients >60 years of age appear to be comparable with those of younger patients. However, little objective data exist on the outcomes of patients >65 years of age undergoing OLT.

OBJECTIVE

To review the outcomes of OLT in the Irish National Transplant Unit in patients >65 years of age and to compare outcomes with patients ≤65 years of age. Second, to identify any factors that may provide valuable prognostic information regarding outcomes.

METHOD

Patients >65 years of age who underwent OLT since the inception of the National Liver Unit in 1993 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Medical records were reviewed. Survival was compared with the overall cohort using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Independent variables between the two groups were assessed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Between January 1993 and December 2009, 551 patients underwent 639 transplants in the Irish National Liver Transplant Unit. Forty-three transplants were performed in 40 patients >65 years of age. Unadjusted one- and three-year survival rates for the elderly cohort were 77.8% and 64.5%, respectively. This compared with 93% and 85%, respectively, in the unselected cohort. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, a significant benefit in survival was observed in patients ≤65 years of age (P=0.017). Similarly, when adjusted for sex, a significant difference was noted between the groups. Male patients >65 years of age had poorer survival compared with their female counterparts >65 years of age and all patients ≤65 years of age (P=0.02). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to preoperative variables such as bilirubin, creatinine and sodium levels, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score. A significant difference was seen in male patients >65 years of age with more than one comorbidity, compared with female patients and male patients ≤65 years of age.

CONCLUSION

Male sex was associated with poorer survival in patients >65 years of age undergoing OLT. Multiple comorbidities in elderly male patients should be considered a relative contraindication in patients being assessed for OLT.

Liver transplantation in septuagenarians receiving model for end-stage liver disease exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma: the national experience

Current liver allocation policy in the United States grants liver transplant candidates with stage T2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a priority Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 22, regardless of age. Because advanced age may portend an increase in all-cause mortality after transplantation for any diagnosis, the aim of this study was to examine overall posttransplant survival in elderly patients with HCC versus younger cohorts. Based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival rates were compared. Recipients undergoing primary liver transplantation were stratified into cohorts based on age (<70 or ≥ 70 years) and the receipt of MELD exception points for HCC. Log-rank and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. In 2009, 143 transplants were performed for patients who were 70 years old or older. Forty-two percent of these patients received a MELD exception for HCC. Regardless of the diagnosis, the overall survival rate was significantly attenuated for the septuagenarians versus the younger cohort. After 5 years of follow-up, this disparity exceeded 10% to 15% depending on the populations being compared. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 88.4%, 83.2%, 79.6%, 76.1%, and 72.7%, respectively, for the patients who were younger than 70 years and 81.1%, 73.8%, 67.1%, 61.9%, and 55.2%, respectively, for the patients who were 70 years old or older. Five-year survival was negatively affected for patients with HCC who were younger than 70 years; this disparity was not observed for patients with HCC who were 70 years old or older. In conclusion, although patients who are 70 years old or older compose a small fraction of transplant recipients in the United States, patients in this group undergoing transplantation for HCC form an even smaller subset. Overall, transplantation in this age group yields outcomes inferior to those for younger cohorts. However, unlike patients who are less than 70 years old and receive MELD exception points, overall liver transplant survival is not affected by HCC at an advanced age.

Recipient-based approach to tailoring immunosuppression in liver transplantation

Improvements in the field of transplant immunosuppression (IS) have led to significant advances in long-term survival of liver transplant recipients. Despite this progress, survival rates vary depending on recipient, donor and/or perioperative factors. Tailoring IS based on recipient factors is of growing interest among health care providers involved in the care of organ transplant recipients. To date there is no consensus document addressing individualized IS therapy for liver transplant recipients. This review will discuss the information available on the effect of the various IS drugs on recipient-based factors such as age, ethnicity, and liver disease etiology.

Liver transplantation in patients aged 65 and over: a case-control study

INTRODUCTION

The average age of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) is consistently increasing. The aim of this case-control study is to evaluate survival and outcome of patients ≥65 yr compared to younger patients undergoing LT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 10/00 to 4/08 we performed 330 primary LT, 31 (9.4%) of these were in patients aged 65-70. Following a case-control approach, we compared these patients with 31 patients aged between 41 and 64 yr and matched according to sex, LT indication, viral status, cadaveric/living donor, LT timing, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in demographic and surgical donor characteristics. The mean MELD score was under 18 in both groups. Post-LT complications occurred with a similar incidence in the two groups. one-, three-, and five-yr survival was 83.9%, 80.6%, and 80.6%, respectively, for the elderly group, and 80.6%, 73.8%, and 73.8%, respectively, for the young group (p = 0.61).

DISCUSSION

Patients aged between 65 and 70 with low MELD score who undergo LT have the same short- and middle-term survival expectancy, morbidity, and outcome quality as younger patients with the same indication and same pre-LT pathology severity, whatever they might be. Thus, chronological age alone should not deter LT workup in patients >65 and <70.

Coronary artery disease in orthotopic liver transplantation: pretransplant assessment and management

The prevalence of coronary artery disease in end-stage liver disease is only now being recognized. Liver transplant patients are a high risk subgroup for coronary artery disease, even if asymptomatic. Coronary artery disease is a predictor of poor outcomes; therefore, identification of those at risk must be a key clinical priority. However, risk assessment is particularly difficult as many of the available diagnostic tools have either proven to be unhelpful or remain to be validated. Risk factor profiling has been unable to identify those at risk and commonly underestimates risk. The high negative predictive value of Dobutamine stress echo, when target heart rates are achieved, allows it to be used to identify a low risk group. For all other patients, proceeding to invasive coronary angiography is often necessary, and the risks of the procedure can be reduced by a transradial approach. Pharmacological reduction of the consequences of coronary artery disease can be limited by the underlying liver disease. Revascularization pre-transplantation is recommended in international guidelines but has demonstrated little evidence of benefit. Surgical revascularization carries an increased risk in these patients and is commonly performed pre-transplantation, although combined liver and cardiac surgery has been described. Percutaneous coronary intervention is increasingly used with patients requiring anti-platelet medication for up to one year after intervention. We present a review of all these issues and the evidence for assessing and managing these high-risk patients.