CD25, CD28 and CD38 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a tool to predict acute rejection after liver transplantation

CD38: An important regulator of T cell function

Cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) is a multifunctional extracellular enzyme on the cell surface with NADase and cyclase activities. CD38 is not only expressed in human immune cells, such as lymphocytes and plasma cells, but also is abnormally expressed in a variety of tumor cells, which is closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors. T cells are one of the important immune cells in the body. As NAD consuming enzymes, CD38, ART2, SIRT1 and PARP1 are closely related to the number and function of T cells. CD38 may also influence the activity of ART2, SIRT1 and PARP1 through the CD38-NAD⁺ axis to indirectly affect the number and function of T cells. Thus, CD38-NAD⁺ axis has a profound effect on T cell activity. In this paper, we reviewed the role and mechanism of CD38⁺ CD4⁺ T cells / CD38⁺ CD8⁺ T cells in cellular immunity and the effects of the CD38-NAD⁺ axis on T cell activity. We also summarized the relationship between the CD38 expression level on T cell surface and disease prediction and prognosis, the effects of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies on T cell activity and function, and the role of anti-CD38 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in tumor immunity. This will provide an important theoretical basis for a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between CD38 and T cells.

Progress and challenges in diagnosis and treatment of rejection following liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver biopsy remains the most widely utilized method for diagnosis of allograft rejection following liver transplantation. However, associated risks and limitations present an opportunity for emerging noninvasive diagnostic techniques to improve upon the current standard of care. This review evaluates progress toward development of new noninvasive methods for the monitoring and diagnosing of allograft rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies investigate the potential of a variety of analytes. Quantification of dd-cfDNA and of DSA show potential to indicate status of allograft rejection and aid in immunosuppression modulation. Moreover, mRNA microarray profiling of differentially expressed genes, as well as characterization of cytokine responses and immunophenotypic shifts following liver transplantation, may predict and recognize rejection events.

SUMMARY

Noninvasive methods are not yet ready to replace liver biopsy as the standard of care for diagnosis of allograft rejection, though several assays and biomarkers have shown promising preliminary results. As noninvasive techniques become validated in clinical settings, their integration with current diagnostic methods is likely to foster increased sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of diagnosis.

Identification of peripheral CD154+ T cells and HLA-DRB1 as biomarkers of acute cellular rejection in adult liver transplant recipients

Decreasing graft rejection and increasing graft and patient survival are great challenges facing liver transplantation (LT). Different T cell subsets participate in the acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the allograft. Cell-mediated immunity markers of the recipient could help to understand the mechanisms underlying acute rejection. This study aimed to analyse different surface antigens on T cells in a cohort of adult liver patients undergoing LT to determine the influence on ACR using multi-parametric flow cytometry functional assay. Thirty patients were monitored at baseline and during 1 year post-transplant. Two groups were established, with (ACR) and without (NACR) acute cellular rejection. Leukocyte, total lymphocyte, percentages of CD4+ CD154+ and CD8+ CD154+ T cells, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between recipient-donor and their relation with ACR as well as the acute rejection frequencies were analysed. T cells were stimulated with concanavalin A (Con-A) and surface antigens were analysed by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. A high percentage of CD4+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·001) and a low percentage of CD8+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·002) at baseline were statistically significant in ACR. A receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the cut-off values capable to stratify patients at high risk of ACR with high sensitivity and specificity for CD4+ CD154+ (P = 0·001) and CD8+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·002). In logistic regression analysis, CD4+ CD154+ , CD8+ CD154+ and HLA mismatch were confirmed as independent risk factors to ACR. Post-transplant percentages of both T cell subsets were significantly higher in ACR, despite variations compared to pretransplant. These findings support the selection of candidates for LT based on the pretransplant percentages of CD4+ CD154+ and CD8+ CD154+ T cells in parallel with other transplant factors.

Skewed T cell responses to Epstein-Barr virus in long-term asymptomatic kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) abnormally replicate the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV). To better understand how long-term immunosuppression impacts the immune control of this EBV re-emergence, we systematically compared 10 clinically stable KTRs to 30 healthy controls (HCs). The EBV-specific T cell responses were determined in both groups by multiparameter flow cytometry with intra cellular cytokine staining (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 15) and ELISpot-IFNγ assays (KTRs n = 7; HCs n = 7). The T/B/NK cell counts (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 30) and the NK/T cell differentiation and activation phenotypes (KTRs n = 10; HCs n = 15/30) were also measured. We show that in KTRs, the Th1 effector CD4+ T cell responses against latent EBV proteins are weak (2/7 responders). Conversely, the frequencies total EBV-specific CD8+T cells are conserved in KTRs (n = 10) and span a wider range of EBNA-3A peptides (5/7responders) than in HCs (5/7responders). Those modifications of the EBV-specific T cell response were associated with a profound CD4+ T cell lymphopenia in KTRs compared to HCs, involving the naïve CD4+ T cell subset, and a persistent activation of highly-differentiated senescent CD8+ T cells. The proportion of total NK / CD8+ T cells expressing PD-1 was also increased in KTRs. Noteworthy, PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells normalized with time after transplantation. In conclusion, we show modifications of the EBV-specific cellular immunity in long term transplant recipients. This may be the result of both persistent EBV antigenic stimulation and profound immunosuppression induced by anti-rejection treatments. These findings provide new insights into the immunopathology of EBV infection after renal transplantation.

Microbial translocation and T cell activation are modified by direct-acting antiviral therapy in HCV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Microbial translocation from the gut lumen has been involved in the pathogenesis of liver damage in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

AIM

To investigate the impact of direct-acting antiviral treatment on microbial translocation and T-cell activation, in patients with hepatitis C-related liver disease.

METHODS

We enrolled two groups of HCV-infected patients undergoing direct-acting antiviral treatment: patients with fibrosis ≥F3 according to Metavir (Group ≥F3); patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation and Metavir ≥F2 (Group Liver Transplantation + ≥F2). All patients were treated with direct-acting antivirals based on ongoing guidelines. Surrogate biomarkers of microbial translocation (plasma concentrations of soluble-CD14, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and intestinal fatty acid-binding protein) were evaluated at baseline, at first month, at the end of treatment and 3 months later. T-cell activation was measured by expression of CD38+ HLA-DR at the same time points, only in Group ≥F3.

RESULTS

There were 32 patients in Group ≥F3 and 13 in Group LT + ≥F2. At baseline, levels of soluble-CD14 and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein were significantly higher in both groups vs healthy controls. Baseline soluble-CD14 correlated with glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase (r = 0.384, P = 0.009) and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (r = 0.293, P = 0.05). A significant decrease in plasma levels of surrogate microbial translocation biomarkers was observed during and after treatment in the two groups although values were not normalised. In Group ≥F3, CD38+ HLADR+ T-cell expression was significantly decreased by direct-acting antiviral treatment. Relapsers (9%) showed higher soluble-CD14 levels at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Surrogate microbial translocation markers and T cell activation are increased in HCV-infected patients with liver fibrosis and decrease during direct-acting antiviral treatment.

Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As part of liver transplantation, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections resulting from the immune response of the body against transplanted organ or tissues from a different person whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until October 2016 to identify randomised clinical trials on immunosuppression for liver transplantation.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adult participants undergoing liver transplantation (or liver retransplantation) for any reason. We excluded trials in which participants had undergone multivisceral transplantation or participants with established graft rejections. We considered any of the various maintenance immunosuppressive regimens compared with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 26 trials (3842 participants) in the review, and 23 trials (3693 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The vast majority of the participants underwent primary liver transplantation. All of the trials were at high risk of bias, and all of the evidence was of low or very low quality. In addition, because of sparse data involving trials at high risk of bias, it is not possible to entirely rely on the results of the network meta-analysis. The trials included mainly participants undergoing primary liver transplantation of varied aetiologies. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 3 to 144 months. The most common maintenance immunosuppression used as a control was tacrolimus. There was no evidence of difference in mortality (21 trials; 3492 participants) or graft loss (15 trials; 2961 participants) at maximal follow-up between the different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based on the network meta-analysis. In the direct comparison, based on a single trial including 222 participants, tacrolimus plus sirolimus had increased mortality (HR 2.76, 95% CrI 1.30 to 6.69) and graft loss (HR 2.34, 95% CrI 1.28 to 4.61) at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with serious adverse events (1 trial; 719 participants), proportion of people with any adverse events (2 trials; 940 participants), renal impairment (8 trials; 2233 participants), chronic kidney disease (1 trial; 100 participants), graft rejections (any) (16 trials; 2726 participants), and graft rejections requiring treatment (5 trials; 1025 participants) between the different immunosuppressive regimens. The network meta-analysis showed that the number of adverse events was lower with cyclosporine A than with many other immunosuppressive regimens (12 trials; 1748 participants), and the risk of retransplantation (13 trials; 1994 participants) was higher with cyclosporine A than with tacrolimus (HR 3.08, 95% CrI 1.13 to 9.90). None of the trials reported number of serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, or costs.

FUNDING

14 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies who would benefit from the results of the trial; two trials were funded by parties who had no vested interest in the results of the trial; and 10 trials did not report the source of funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-quality evidence from a single small trial from direct comparison, tacrolimus plus sirolimus increases mortality and graft loss at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. Based on very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis, we found no evidence of difference between different immunosuppressive regimens. We found very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis and low-quality evidence from direct comparison that cyclosporine A causes more retransplantation compared with tacrolimus. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid postrandomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft loss, renal impairment, chronic kidney disease, and retransplantation. Such trials should use tacrolimus as one of the control groups. Moreover, such trials ought to be designed in such a way as to ensure low risk of bias and low risks of random errors.

Common issues in the management of patients in the waiting list and after liver transplantation

The present document contains the recommendations of an expert panel of transplant hepatologists, appointed by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), on how to manage the most common aspects of liver transplantation: the topics covered include: new treatments for HCV in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation; antiviral treatments in patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation; prophylaxis for HBV recurrence after liver transplantation; indications for liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease; and Immunosuppressive therapy. The statements on each topic were approved by participants at the AISF Transplant Hepatologist Expert Meeting (organized by the Permanent Committee on Liver Transplantation in Mondello on 4-5 October 2015), and are graded according to the Oxford classification of levels of evidence.

Barcelona Consensus on Biomarker-Based Immunosuppressive Drugs Management in Solid Organ Transplantation

With current treatment regimens, a relatively high proportion of transplant recipients experience underimmunosuppression or overimmunosuppression. Recently, several promising biomarkers have been identified for determining patient alloreactivity, which help in assessing the risk of rejection and personal response to the drug; others correlate with graft dysfunction and clinical outcome, offering a realistic opportunity for personalized immunosuppression. This consensus document aims to help tailor immunosuppression to the needs of the individual patient. It examines current knowledge on biomarkers associated with patient risk stratification and immunosuppression requirements that have been generally accepted as promising. It is based on a comprehensive review of the literature and the expert opinion of the Biomarker Working Group of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. The quality of evidence was systematically weighted, and the strength of recommendations was rated according to the GRADE system. Three types of biomarkers are discussed: (1) those associated with the risk of rejection (alloreactivity/tolerance), (2) those reflecting individual response to immunosuppressants, and (3) those associated with graft dysfunction. Analytical aspects of biomarker measurement and novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models accessible to the transplant community are also addressed. Conventional pharmacokinetic biomarkers may be used in combination with those discussed in this article to achieve better outcomes and improve long-term graft survival. Our group of experts has made recommendations for the most appropriate analysis of a proposed panel of preliminary biomarkers, most of which are currently under clinical evaluation in ongoing multicentre clinical trials. A section of Next Steps was also included, in which the Expert Committee is committed to sharing this knowledge with the Transplant Community in the form of triennial updates.

Analytical Aspects of the Implementation of Biomarkers in Clinical Transplantation

In response to the urgent need for new reliable biomarkers to complement the guidance of the immunosuppressive therapy, a huge number of biomarker candidates to be implemented in clinical practice have been introduced to the transplant community. This includes a diverse range of molecules with very different molecular weights, chemical and physical properties, ex vivo stabilities, in vivo kinetic behaviors, and levels of similarity to other molecules, etc. In addition, a large body of different analytical techniques and assay protocols can be used to measure biomarkers. Sometimes, a complex software-based data evaluation is a prerequisite for appropriate interpretation of the results and for their reporting. Although some analytical procedures are of great value for research purposes, they may be too complex for implementation in a clinical setting. Whereas the proof of "fitness for purpose" is appropriate for validation of biomarker assays used in exploratory drug development studies, a higher level of analytical validation must be achieved and eventually advanced analytical performance might be necessary before diagnostic application in transplantation medicine. A high level of consistency of results between laboratories and between methods (if applicable) should be obtained and maintained to make biomarkers effective instruments in support of therapeutic decisions. This overview focuses on preanalytical and analytical aspects to be considered for the implementation of new biomarkers for adjusting immunosuppression in a clinical setting and highlights critical points to be addressed on the way to make them suitable as diagnostic tools. These include but are not limited to appropriate method validation, standardization, education, automation, and commercialization.

Loss of CD28 on Peripheral T Cells Decreases the Risk for Early Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

Background

End-stage renal disease patients have a dysfunctional, prematurely aged peripheral T-cell system. Here we hypothesized that the degree of premature T-cell ageing before kidney transplantation predicts the risk for early acute allograft rejection (EAR).

Methods

222 living donor kidney transplant recipients were prospectively analyzed. EAR was defined as biopsy proven acute allograft rejection within 3 months after kidney transplantation. The differentiation status of circulating T cells, the relative telomere length and the number of CD31⁺ naive T cells were determined as T-cell ageing parameters.

Results

Of the 222 patients analyzed, 30 (14%) developed an EAR. The donor age and the historical panel reactive antibody score were significantly higher (p = 0.024 and p = 0.039 respectively) and the number of related donor kidney transplantation was significantly lower (p = 0.018) in the EAR group. EAR-patients showed lower CD4⁺CD28null T-cell numbers (p<0.01) and the same trend was observed for CD8⁺CD28null T-cell numbers (p = 0.08). No differences regarding the other ageing parameters were found. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that higher CD4⁺CD28null T-cell numbers was associated with a lower risk for EAR (HR: 0.65, p = 0.028). In vitro, a significant lower percentage of alloreactive T cells was observed within CD28null T cells (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Immunological ageing-related expansion of highly differentiated CD28null T cells is associated with a lower risk for EAR.

T-Cell Surface Antigens and sCD30 as Biomarkers of the Risk of Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation

T-cell activation is a characteristic of organ rejection. T cells, located in the draining lymph nodes of the transplant recipient, are faced with non-self-molecules presented by antigen presenting cells and become activated. Activated T cells are characterized by up-regulated surface antigens, such as costimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules, chemokine receptors, and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Surface antigen expression can be followed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies in either cell function assays using donor-specific or nonspecific stimulation of isolated cells or whole blood and without stimulation on circulating lymphocytes. Molecules such as CD30 can be proteolytically cleaved off the surface of activated cells in vivo, and the determination of the soluble protein (sCD30) in serum or plasma is performed by immunoassays. As promising biomarkers for rejection and long-term transplant outcome, CD28 (costimulatory receptor for CD80 and CD86), CD154 (CD40 ligand), and sCD30 (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 8) have been identified. Whereas cell function assays are time-consuming laboratory-developed tests which are difficult to standardize, commercial assays are frequently available for soluble proteins. Therefore, more data from clinical trials have been published for sCD30 compared with the surface antigens on activated T cells. This short review summarizes the association between selected surface antigens and immunosuppression, and rejection in solid organ transplantation.

Lymphocyte surface molecules as immune activation biomarkers

Immunosuppression is mandatory after solid organ transplantation between HLA mismatched individuals. It is a lifelong therapy that needs to be closely monitored to avoid under- and over-immunosuppression. For many drugs, pharmacokinetic monitoring has been proven to be beneficial. However, the therapeutic ranges are statistically derived surrogate markers for the effects that cannot predict the individual response of single patients. Better tailored immunosuppression biomarkers are needed that indicate immune activation. T cells are critically involved in organ rejection, and the means to assess their activation state may be promising to individualize immunosuppressive therapies. Activated T cells can be monitored with flow cytometry based on surface molecules that are typically up regulated or with molecules that are cleaved off the cell surface. Among these molecules are the interleukin-2 receptor (CD25); transferrin receptor (CD71); the T cell co-stimulatory molecules CD28, CD69, and CD154 and sCD30, which is a member of the TNF-alpha family. The effect of immunosuppressive drugs on T cell activation can be recorded with indirect cell function assays or by directly monitoring activated T cells in whole blood. Soluble proteins can be measured with immunoassays. This review provides a summary of the experimental and clinical studies investigating the potential of surface molecules as a tool for immune monitoring. It critically discusses the obstacles and shortcomings from an analytical and diagnostic perspective that are currently preventing their use in multicenter trials and clinical routine monitoring of transplant patients.

Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation

The evaluation of the immunosuppression state in liver transplanted patients is crucial for a correct post-transplant management and a major step towards the personalisation of the immunosuppressive therapy. However, current immunological monitoring after liver transplantation relies mainly on clinical judgment and on immunosuppressive drug levels, without a proper assessment of the real suppression of the immunological system. Various markers have been studied in an attempt to identify a specific indicator of graft rejection and graft acceptance after liver transplantation. Considering acute rejection, the most studied markers are pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines and other proteins related to inflammation. However there is considerable overlap with other conditions, and only few of them have been validated. Standard liver tests cannot be used as markers of graft rejection due to their low sensitivity and specificity and the weak correlation with the severity of histopathological findings. Several studies have been performed to identify biomarkers of tolerance in liver transplanted patients. Most of them are based on the analysis of peripheral blood samples and on the use of transcriptional profiling techniques. Amongst these, NK cell-related molecules seem to be the most valid marker of graft acceptance, whereas the role CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T cells has still to be properly defined.

CMV driven CD8(+) T-cell activation is associated with acute rejection in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is the definitive treatment for terminal respiratory disease, but the associated mortality rate is high. Acute rejection of the transplanted lung is a key determinant of adverse prognosis. Furthermore, an epidemiological relationship has been established between the occurrence of acute lung rejection and cytomegalovirus infection. However, the reasons for this association remain unclear. Here, we performed a longitudinal characterization of CMV-specific T-cell responses and immune activation status in the peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of forty-four lung transplant patients. Acute rejection was associated with high levels of cellular activation in the periphery, reflecting strong CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell activity post-transplant. Peripheral and lung CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses were very similar, and related to the presence of CMV in the transplanted organ. These findings support that activated CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cells in the lung may play a role in promoting acute rejection.

Biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: A review

The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a liver biopsy. The quest for an alternative non-invasive biomarkers has been long and is ongoing. However, an efficient and useful biomarker has not been developed yet. In this manuscript, we review all possible candidate biomarkers that have been studied in recent years, starting with cytokines and ending with an overview of different newly discovered "omics". Promising paths are being explored but a valid non-invasive biomarker has not been discovered yet.

Surface markers of lymphocyte activation and markers of cell proliferation

The individualization of immunosuppression is an approach for preventing rejection in the early phase after transplantation and for avoiding the long-term side effects of over immunosuppression. Pharmacodynamic markers, either specific or nonspecific, have been proposed as complementary tools to drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. A key event in graft rejection is the activation and proliferation of the recipient's lymphocytes, particularly T cells. Activated T cells express surface receptors, such as CD25 (the IL-2 receptor) and CD71 (the transferrin receptor), or co-stimulatory molecules (CD26, CD27, CD28, CD30, CD154 or CD40L, and CD134). Both surface marker expression and cell proliferation are predominately assessed by flow cytometry. Protocols have been established and utilized for both in vitro and ex vivo investigations with either isolated lymphocytes or whole blood. This article reviews the current body of research regarding the use of lymphocyte proliferation and surface activation markers with an emphasis on T cells. Experimental and clinical results related to these markers, as well as methodological issues and open questions, are addressed.

Peripheral blood sampling for the detection of allograft rejection: biomarker identification and validation

Currently, acute allograft rejection can only be detected reliably by deterioration of graft function confirmed by allograft biopsy. A huge drawback of this method of diagnosis is that substantial organ damage has already taken place at the time that rejection is diagnosed. Discovering and validating noninvasive biomarkers that predict acute rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction, is of great importance. Many studies have investigated changes in the peripheral blood in an attempt to find biomarkers that reflect changes in the graft directly or indirectly. Herein, we will review the promises and limitations of the peripheral blood biomarkers that have been described in the literature so far.

Significance of alanine aminopeptidase N (APN) in bile in the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation requires histopathologic examination for confirmation of the diagnosis, however, the procedure is invasive and its interpretation is not always accurate. The aim of this study was to find novel protein markers in bile for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quantitative proteomic analysis using the (18)O labeling method was used to search for bile proteins of interest. Nine recipients were selected who had liver dysfunction, diagnosed by liver biopsy, either with ACR (ACR group, n = 5) or without (LD group, n = 4). Donor bile samples were obtained from nine independent live liver donors. Enzyme activity in bile samples was assayed and liver biopsy specimens were immunostained for candidate protein of ACR.

RESULTS

The analysis identified 78 proteins, among which alanine aminopeptidase N (APN/CD13) was considered a candidate marker of ACR. Comparative analysis of the ACR and LD groups showed high APN enzyme activity in three (60%) of five cases of the ACR group, while it was as low as donor level in all patients of the LD group. APN enzyme activity in bile samples of liver dysfunction liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients of the ACR group collected within 3 d before biopsy-confirmed ACR (n = 10) was significantly higher (584 ± 434 U/g protein) than in those of recipients free of ACR (n = 96, 301 ± 271 U/g protein) (P = 0.004). APN overexpression along bile canaliculi was observed during ACR in all five cases of the ACR group.

CONCLUSION

APN in bile seems to be a useful and noninvasive biomarker of ACR after liver transplantation.

CD28 expression by peripheral blood lymphocytes as a potential predictor of the development of de novo malignancies in long-term survivors after liver transplantation

At present, no method is available for accurately monitoring the degree of immunosuppression induced by antirejection therapies. The aim of this study was to determine whether CD28 and CD38 expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells could be useful in predicting the development of de novo malignancies after liver transplantation. Flow cytometry analysis was used to measure the expression of CD28 and CD38 by peripheral blood lymphocytes in 134 stable, long-term survivors of liver transplantation. Patients who developed a de novo malignancy after undergoing a medical checkup were entered into a cancer group. Twenty-two patients (16.4%) developed at least 1 de novo malignancy over a mean interval of 22 ± 14 months (1.2-49.4 months) after the checkup. The mean frequency of CD28(+)CD8(+) cells was significantly lower in the cancer group versus the noncancer group (39% ± 22 versus 51% ± 21, P = 0.008), but CD38 expression was similar in the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that an age greater than 50 years (odds ratio = 5.81) and a low frequency of CD28(+)CD8(+) cells at the time of the checkup (odds ratio =3.16) were the only significant predictors of the development of de novo malignancies (P = 0.027). The actuarial proportion of patients with de novo malignancies was significantly lower when the frequency of CD28(+)CD8(+) cells was greater than or equal to 40% instead of less than 40% (P = 0.01). Flow cytometry measurements of CD28 expression by peripheral blood lymphocytes may facilitate the identification of patients at a high risk of developing de novo malignancies. Further prospective studies are necessary to determine whether such measurements could have a place in routine clinical practice to enable the intensity of immunosuppression to be minimized in patients who have an increased risk of developing cancer.

Fludarabine modulates composition and function of the T cell pool in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

The combination of cytotoxic treatment with strategies for immune activation represents an attractive strategy for tumour therapy. Following reduction of high tumour burden by effective cytotoxic agents, two major immune-stimulating approaches are being pursued. First, innate immunity can be activated by monoclonal antibodies triggering antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Second, tumour-specific T cell responses can be generated by immunization of patients with peptides derived from tumour antigens and infused in soluble form or loaded onto dendritic cells. The choice of cytotoxic agents for such combinatory regimens is crucial since most substances such as fludarabine are considered immunosuppressive while others such as cyclophosphamide can have immunostimulatory activity. We tested in this study whether fludarabine and/or cyclophosphamide, which represent a very effective treatment regimen for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, would interfere with a therapeutic strategy of T cell activation. Analysis of peripheral blood samples from patients prior and during fludarabine/cyclophosphamide therapy revealed rapid and sustained reduction of tumour cells but also of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. This correlated with a significant cytotoxic activity of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide on T cells in vitro. Unexpectedly, T cells surviving fludarabine/cyclophosphamide treatment in vitro had a more mature phenotype, while fludarabine-treated T cells were significantly more responsive to mitogenic stimulation than their untreated counterparts and showed a shift towards T(H)1 cytokine secretion. In conclusion, fludarabine/cyclophosphamide therapy though inducing significant and relevant T cell depletion seems to generate a micromilieu suitable for subsequent T cell activation.

Impact of acute cellular rejection on coagulation and fibrinolysis biomarkers within the immediate post-operative period in pediatric liver transplantation

We studied restoration of the coagulation and fibrinolysis system in pediatric patients following liver transplantation and biomarkers of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis for suspecting the occurrence of acute cellular rejection. Coagulation activity recovered rapidly within two days following transplantation, but it took approximately 21-28 days for full recovery of the coagulation and fibrinolysis factors synthesized in the liver. PAI-1 levels were significantly higher in patients at the time of acute cellular rejection compared with levels after control of AR, and levels on days 14 and 28 in patients without AR. Plasma protein C and plasminogen levels at the time of rejection were significantly lower than those on day 14 in patients without AR. Statistical analysis suggested that an increase in plasma PAI-1 at a single time point in the post-operative period is a reliable marker among the coagulation and fibrinolysis factors for suspecting the occurrence of acute cellular rejection. These data suggested that appropriate anticoagulation may be required for 14 days after liver transplantation in order to avoid vascular complications and measurement of plasma PAI-1 levels may be useful for suspecting the occurrence of acute cellular rejection in pediatric patients following liver transplantation.

CD127(low) expression in CD4+CD25(high) T cells as immune biomarker of renal function in transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive tests measuring cellular immunity could help predict immunologic risk and subsequent allograft dysfunction in transplant patients. CD25 is a promising marker of activation. Recent descriptions of CD127 expression as a discriminating factor between regulatory and activated T cells suggest its potential utility.

METHODS

Expression of CD127 in CD4+CD25 T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood from 62 renal transplanted patients and 30 healthy controls. Forty patients presented stable graft function and 22 suffered renal failure.

RESULTS

Renal transplant patients showed higher levels of CD127(high) and a lower frequency of CD127(low) than healthy controls (0.63% vs. 0.29% [P<0.001] and 1.4% vs. 2.4% [P<0.001], respectively). However, high frequencies of not only CD127(high) but also CD127(low) showed a significant correlation with serum creatinine levels (P=0.012 and P=0.003, respectively). Allogenic stimulation in vitro increased the frequency of CD127(low) subset in a dose dependent manner. Furthermore, in patients with a high frequency of CD127(low) subset, this consisted mostly of FoxP3 negative cells, discarding their regulatory origin. Median frequency of CD127(low), but not CD127(high), cells showed significant differences between patients with stable function and with renal failure (P<0.005), with 16.7% and 53.1% of individuals above the median CD127(low) value (1.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of CD127(low) subset through staining of CD4+ T cells with the combined markers CD127/CD25/CD45RO has been demonstrated to be a significant tool for monitoring the outcome course of renal transplant patients.