Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to adult heart transplantation

Prognostic Value of APACHE IV Score in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation on ECMO

BACKGROUND

Methods for risk stratification of candidates for heart transplantation (HTx) supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are limited. We evaluated the reliability of the APACHE IV score to identify the risk of mortality in this patient subset in a multicenter study.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2022, 167 consecutive ECMO patients were bridged to HTx; they were divided into two groups, according to a cutoff value of APACHE IV score, obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and compared through the log-Rank test. Cox regression model was used to estimate which factors were associated with survival.

RESULTS

The 90-day mortality prediction of the APACHE IV score showed an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), with a cutoff value of 49 (specificity 91.7%-sensibility 69.6%). 125 patients (74.8%) showed an APACHE IV score value < 49 (Group A), and 42 (25.2%) ≥ 49 (Group B). 90-day mortality was 11.2% in Group A and 76.2% in Group B (p < 0.01). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 85.5%, 77% versus 23.4%, 23.4% (p < 0.01) in Groups A and B. Mortality correlated at univariable analysis with recipient age, body mass index, mechanical ventilation, APACHE IV score, and platelets number. At multivariable analysis only APACHE IV score (HR: 1.07 [1.05-1.09, 95% CI]) independently affected survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The APACHE IV score represents a powerful predictor of survival in patients bridged to HTx on ECMO support, and could guide candidacy of patients on ECMO.

The Influence of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Antibiotic Pharmacokinetics

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is becoming increasingly utilized to support critically ill patients who experience life-threatening cardiac or pulmonary compromise. The provision of this intervention poses challenges related to its complications and the optimization of medication therapy. ECMO's mechanical circulatory support is facilitated via various devices and equipment that have been shown to sequester lipophilic- and protein-bound medications, including anti-infectives. Since infectious outcomes are dependent on achieving specific anti-infectives' pharmacodynamic targets, the understanding of these medications' pharmacokinetic parameters in the setting of ECMO is important to clinicians. This narrative, non-systematic review evaluated the findings of the most recent and robust pharmacokinetic analyses for commonly utilized anti-infectives in the setting of ECMO. The data from available literature indicates that anti-infective pharmacokinetic parameters are similar to those observed in other non-ECMO critically ill populations, but considerable variability in the findings was observed between patients, thus prompting further evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring in this complex population.

Risk stratification of patients listed for heart transplantation while supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients in severe cardiogenic shock. In the absence of recovery, these patients may need to be listed for heart transplant (HT), which offers the best long-term prognosis. However, posttransplantation mortality is significantly elevated in patients who receive ECMO. The objective of the present study was to describe and risk-stratify different profiles of patients listed for HT supported by ECMO.

METHODS

Patients listed for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were analyzed. The primary outcome was 1-year survival and was assessed in patients bridged to transplant with ECMO (ECMO_BTT) and patients who were previously supported on ECMO but had it removed before HT (ECMO_REMOVED).

RESULTS

Among 65,636 adult candidates listed for HT (between 2001 and 2017), 712 were supported on ECMO, 292 of whom (41%) underwent HT (ECMO_BTT, n = 202; ECMO_REMOVED, n = 90). Most of the patients with ECMO_REMOVED were transplanted with a ventricular assist device. In ECMO_BTT, recipient age (each 10-year increase), time on the waitlist (both defined as minor risk factors), need for dialysis, and need for mechanical ventilation (both defined as major risk factors) were independent predictors of mortality. ECMO_REMOVED and ECMO_BTT with no risk factors showed 1-year survival comparable to that in patients who were never supported on ECMO. Compared with patients who were never on ECMO, patients in ECMO_BTT group with minor risk factors, 1 major risk factor, and 2 major risk factors had ~2-, ~5-, and >10-fold greater 1-year mortality, respectively (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The HT recipients in the ECMO_REMOVED and ECMO_BTT groups with no risk factors showed similar survival as the HT recipients who were never supported on ECMO. In the ECMO_BTT group, posttransplantation mortality increased significantly with increasing risk factors.

Post Heart Transplantation Outcomes of Patients Supported on Biventricular Mechanical Support

With the implementation of the new heart transplant (HT) allocation system, patients requiring biventricular support systems have the highest priority, a shorter waitlist time, and a higher frequency of HT. However, the short-term and long-term outcomes of such patients are often disputed. Hence, we examined the outcomes of these patients who underwent HT before change in allocation scheme. Additionally, we compared post-HT outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with other nondischargeable biventricular (BiVAD) supported patients. We identified adult ECMO or BiVAD supported HT recipients between 2000 and 2018 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We compared survival with the Kaplan-Meier method. Using overlap propensity score weighting, we constructed Cox proportional hazards regression models to determine the risk-adjusted influence of BiVAD versus ECMO on survival. Of the 730 patients HT recipients; 528 (72.3%) and 202 (27.7%) were bridged with BiVAD and ECMO, respectively. For BiVAD versus ECMO patients, the 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 8.0% versus 14.4%, 16.3% versus 21.3%, 22.4% versus 25.3%, and 26.3% versus 25.7%, respectively. Risk-adjusted post-HT survival of BiVAD and ECMO patients at 30-day (HR 1.24 [95% CI, 0.68-2.27]; P = 0.4863), 1-year (HR 1.29 [95% CI, 0.80-2.09]; P = 0.3009), 3-year (HR 1.27 [95% CI, 0.83-1.94]; P = 0.2801), and 5-year (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.90-2.05; P = 0.1501) were similar. Around three-fourth of the ECMO or BiVAD supported patients were alive at 5-years post-HT. The short-term and long-term post-HT survivals of groups were comparable.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to durable mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with cardiogenic shock may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) prior to durable mechanical circulatory support (dMCS) or heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS

We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients with ECMO support as bridge to dMCS or HTx between 1/1/13 and 12/31/20.

RESULTS

Of 57 patients who underwent bridging ECMO, 41 (72%) received dMCS (approximately half with biventricular support) and 16 (28%) underwent HTx, 13 (81%) after the 2018 UNOS allocation system change. ECMO → HTx patients had shorter ventilatory time (3.5 vs 7.5 days; p = 0.018), ICU stay (6 vs 18 days; p = 0.001), and less need for inpatient rehabilitation (18.8% vs 57.5%; p = 0.016). The 1-year survival post HTx was 81.3% in the ECMO → HTx group and 86.4% in the ECMO → dMCS group (p = 0.11). For those patients in the ECMO → dMCS group who did not undergo HTx, 1-year survival was significantly lower, 31.6% (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients on ECMO who undergo HTx, with or without dMCS bridge, have acceptable post-HTx survival. These findings suggest that HTx from ECMO is a viable option for carefully selected patients deemed acceptable to proceed with definitive advanced therapies, especially in the era of the new UNOS allocation system.

Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the 2018 adult heart allocation policy

Background

The purpose of the study was to characterize changes in waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients bridged to heart transplantation under the 2018 adult heart allocation policy.

Methods

All adult patients listed for isolated heart transplantation from August 2016 to December 2020 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were stratified into Eras (Era 1 and Era 2) centered around the policy change on October 18, 2018. Competing risk regression was used to evaluate waitlist death or deterioration across Eras. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between use of ECMO and 1-year post-transplant mortality within each Era.

Results

Of 8,902 heart transplants included in analysis, 339 (3.8%) were bridged with ECMO (Era 2: 6.1% vs Era 1: 1.2%, P<0.001). Patients bridged with ECMO in Era 2 were less frequently female (26.0% vs 42.0%, P = 0.02) and experienced shorter waitlist times (5 vs 11 days, P<0.001) along with a lower likelihood of waitlist death or deterioration (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.45, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.30–0.68, P<0.001) compared to those in Era 1. Use of ECMO was associated with increased post-transplant mortality at 1-year compared to all other transplants in Era 1 (hazard ratio 3.78, 95% CI 1.88–7.61, P < 0.001) but not Era 2.

Conclusions

Patients bridged with ECMO in Era 2 experience improved waitlist and post-transplant outcomes compared to Era 1, giving credence to the increased use of ECMO under the new allocation policy.

Primary Graft Dysfunction After Isolated Heart Transplantation - Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications Based on a Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Since the international consensus on primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following heart transplantation (HT) was reported in 2014, few clinical studies have been reported. We aimed to analyze the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications of PGD following the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant criteria in a single center.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study enrolled 570 consecutive adult patients undergoing isolated HT between November 1992 and December 2017. Under a new set of criteria, PGD-left ventricle (PGD-LV) occurred in 35 patients (6.1%; mild, n=1 [0.2%]; moderate, n=14 [2.5%]; severe, n=20 [3.5%]), whereas PGD-right ventricle (PGD-RV) occurred in 3 (0.5%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative admission (odds ratio [OR] 4.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-14.26; P=0.021), preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 4.03; 95% CI 1.75-9.26; P=0.001), and prolonged total ischemic time (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.15; P=0.006) were significant predictors of moderate to severe PGD-LV. Moderate to severe PGD-LV was an independent and significant risk factor for early death (OR 55.64; 95% CI 11.65-265.73; P<0.001), with its effects extending up to 3 months after HT.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate to severe PGD-LV, as defined by the new guidelines, is an important predictor of early mortality, with effects extending up to 3 months after HT. Efforts to reduce the occurrence of moderate to severe PGD-LV may lead to better outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Early Extubation Strategy in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) might be considered a bridge therapy in patients who are expected to have short waiting times for heart transplantation. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent VA-ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation and whether the deployment of an early extubation ECMO strategy is beneficial.

METHODS

Between November 2006 and December 2018, we studied 102 patients who received VA-ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation. We classified these patients into an early extubation ECMO group (n = 24) and a deferred extubation ECMO group (n = 78) based on the length of the intubated period on VA-ECMO (≤ 48 hours or > 48 hours). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The median duration of early extubation VA-ECMO was 10.0 (4.3-17.3) days. The most common cause for patients to be put on ECMO was dilated cardiomyopathy (65.7%) followed by ischemic cardiomyopathy (11.8%). In-hospital mortality rates for the deferred extubation and early extubation groups, respectively, were 24.4% and 8.3% (P = 0.147). During the study period, in the deferred extubation group, 60 (76.9%) underwent transplantation, while 22 (91.7%) underwent transplantation in the early extubation group. Delirium occurred in 83.3% and 33.3% of patients from the deferred extubation and early extubation groups (P < 0.001) and microbiologically confirmed infection was identified in 64.1% and 41.7% of patients from the two groups (P = 0.051), respectively.

CONCLUSION

VA-ECMO as a bridge therapy seems to be feasible for deployment in patients with a short waiting time for heart transplantation. Deployment of the early extubation ECMO strategy was associated with reductions in delirium and infection in this population.

Upper-body cannulation for midterm mechanical circulatory support: A novel bridging strategy to cardiac retransplantation

Heart retransplantation remains a controversial issue, due to the overall shortage of donor organs. Many patients put on the waiting list for retransplantation, decompensate rapidly, and do not survive. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support remains an option in such emergency situations as bridge-to-recovery or bridge-to-transplantation therapy. In peripheral femoral configuration, veno-arterial extracorporeal life support improves the patient's condition by relieving low-cardiac output but immobilizes him or her for an uncertain period of time. The upper-body cannulation is an alternative approach, which allows to maintain the patient awake and mobile. We present two cases of midterm circulatory support as a bridge to heart retransplantation, using upper-body cannulation veno-arterial extracorporeal life support. Two male patients, presenting with progressive cardiac decompensation due to severe graft rejection, were placed on upper-body veno-arterial extracorporeal life support. The stabilization of hemodynamics and improvement of end-organ perfusion could be achieved after extracorporeal life support initiation. After 48 and 40 days, respectively, on extracorporeal life support with active physical therapy and no major adverse events, both patients received a cardiac retransplantation and were eventually discharged home. The presented cases are the first reported where a successful cardiac retransplant was performed following prolonged upper-body extracorporeal life support.

Applied Uses of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy has been around since the 1970s and has completely changed how critical care physicians view supportive therapy for certain patients. ECMO therapy is a supportive therapy provided by a mechanical extracorporeal circuit that is able to directly oxygenate and remove carbon dioxide from the blood. By performing this, ECMO can provide cardiac, respiratory, or combined cardiopulmonary supportive therapy in cases of failure. ECMO therapy also places less emphasis on invasive mechanical ventilation, which prevents barotrauma and gives rest to the lungs. Therefore, they are used for several different conditions. This review article focuses on the definition, principles, types, and practical applications of ECMO therapy.

Implication of Ventricular Assist Devices in Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation

The new allocation criteria classify patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as the highest priority for receiving orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) especially if they are considered not candidates for ventricular assist devices. The outcomes of patients who receive ventricular assist devices (VADs) after being listed for heart transplantation with VA-ECMO is unknown. We analyzed 355 patients listed for OHT with VA-ECMO from the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2006 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine the contribution of prognostic variables to the outcome. Thirty-three patients (9.3%) received VADs (15 dischargeable, 7 non-dischargeable VADs). The VAD and non-VAD groups had similar listing characteristics except that the VAD group were more likely to have non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (48.5% vs. 25.2%), and less likely to be obese (6.1% vs. 25.2%) or have a history of prior organ transplant (3% vs. 31.1%). Patients who underwent VAD implantation had more days on the list (median 189 vs. 14 days) compared to the non-VAD group. Amongst the patients who had VADs, (25/33) 75.5% patients were subsequently transplanted with similar post-transplant survival compared to the non-VAD group (72% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.276). Predictors of one-year post-transplant mortality included panel reactive antibodies (PRA) class I ≥ 20%, recipient smoking history, increased serum creatinine and total bilirubin. Therefore, a small proportion of patients listed for transplantation with VA ECMO undergo VAD implantation. Their waitlist survival is better than non-VAD group but with similar post-transplant survival.

Five years' experience with a peripheral veno-arterial ECMO for mechanical bridge to heart transplantation

Background

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is the only way to save a life for heart transplant candidates and to decrease of waiting list mortality. The choice between short- or long-term pretransplant MCS depends on of type and severity of CHF. One of the most frequently used methods of temporary MSC before orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx) is veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). The aim of this study was to analyze own experience of peripheral VA ECMO (pVA ECMO) in heart transplant candidates needed in urgent HT.

Methods

This study included 182 pts [160 (87.9%) men and 22 (12.1%) female, age 43±1.2 yrs] supported with pVA ECMO in the period from 01. 01. 2013 to 31. 12. 2017 or 23.2% from all waiting list (n=786).

Results

During VA ECMO, 16 (8.8%) of the 182 pts died. In most pts [n=13 (81.3%)] multiorgan failure/sepsis were the cause of death. One hundred and sixty-six (91.2%) pts were successfully bridged to OHTx or 27.9% from all heart transplant recipients (n=594) (2013-2017 yrs). The duration of pVA ECMO before OHTx (n=166) was 5.8±3.2 days. One hundred and forty-three (86.1%) from 166 pts were discharged to home. Post-transplant survival among heart transplant recipient with pre-transplant MCS by pVA ECMO was in comparison with recipients without pretransplant MCS [84.2% vs. 90.1% (6 months), 83.3% vs. 91.8% (1 years), 75.1% vs. 86.1% (2 years), 74.2% vs. 85.8% (3 years), 72.3% vs. 84.7% (4 years), 72.3% vs. 83.5% (5 years) respectively (P<0.0001)].

Conclusions

pVA ECMO is a useful tool of treatment of patients with INTERMACS profile 1/2. Results of OHTx at recipients bridged with VA ECMO are less successful that recipients without pre-transplant MCS. VA ECMO should be considered as a direct bridge to OHTx in conditions of limited financial resources of health care and high availability of donor's hearts.

Veno-arterial-ECMO in the intensive care unit: From technical aspects to clinical practice

The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a salvage therapy in cardiogenic shock is becoming of current practice. While VA-ECMO is potentially a life-saving technique, results are sometimes mitigated, emphasising the need for selecting the right indication in the right patient. This relies upon a clear definition of the individual therapeutic project, including the potential for recovery as well as the possible complications associated with VA-ECMO. To maximise the benefits of VA-ECMO, the basics of extracorporeal circulation should be perfectly understood since VA-ECMO can sometimes be detrimental. Hence, to be successful, VA-ECMO should be used by teams with sufficient experience and initiated after a thorough multidisciplinary discussion considering patient's medical history, pathology as well the anticipated evolution of the disease.

Extracorporeal life support in preoperative and postoperative heart transplant management

Increased experience with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a mode of cardiac support has expanded its use to diverse patient populations including patients requiring a bridge to heart transplantation and patients requiring posttransplant support for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The use of ECLS is associated with acceptable outcomes in well-selected patients. While outcomes with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to heart transplant have been variable, several series have confirmed the safe use of ECLS to stabilize patients prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. These patients are then considered later, when in stable condition, for heart transplant. When ECLS is used prior to heart transplant, mortality is greatest during the first 6 months posttransplant. Patients who are alive 6 months after transplant appear to have similar survival rates as patients who were not supported with ECLS prior to transplant. ECLS support is a reliable therapeutic option for severe PGD and early graft failure after heart transplantation. In patients who require support for severe PGD, venoarterial-ECMO appears to result in better clinical outcomes than LVAD support. ECLS use for PGD after heart transplant continues to be the first line of support. Further studies are necessary to understand the optimal role of ECLS in heart transplantation.

Cost-utility analysis of direct ventricular assist device vs double bridges to heart transplantation in patients with refractory heart failure

OBJECT

This study compared the cost-utility of direct ventricular assist device (VAD) vs double bridges, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before VAD, to heart transplantation in patients with refractory heart failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a health payer perspective, a Markov model was developed. The cycle length was 1 month, and the time horizon was a lifetime. Probabilities and direct cost data were calculated from a nationwide claim database. Utility inputs were adopted from published sources. The utility was expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Both costs and utility were discounted by an annual rate of 3%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of the model.

RESULTS

The direct VAD group had less lifetime costs (USD 95 910 vs USD 129 516) but higher lifetime QALYs than the double bridges group (1.73 vs 0.89). The sensitivity analysis revealed that the direct VAD group consistently had lower cost and higher QALYs during all variations in model parameters. The probability that direct VAD was cost-effective exceeded 75% at any levels of willing-to-pay.

CONCLUSION

From a health insurance payer perspective, direct VAD bridge to heart transplantation appeared to be more cost-effective than double bridges in patients with refractory heart failure.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Shock

An array of interventional therapeutics is available in the modern era, with uses depending on acute or chronic situations. This article focuses on support in acute decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock, including intra-aortic balloon pumps, continuous aortic flow augmentation, and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation.

Extracorporeal Life Support: Physiological Concepts and Clinical Outcomes

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) describes a system that involves drainage from the venous circulation and return via an oxygenator into the arterial circulation (veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). ECLS provides effective cardiopulmonary support, but the parallel circulation has complex effects on the systemic and pulmonary circulatory physiology. An understanding of the physiological changes is fundamental to the management of ECLS. In this review, the key physiological concepts and the implications on the clinical management of ECLS are discussed. In addition, the clinical outcomes associated with ECLS in cardiogenic shock are systematically reviewed. The paucity of clinical trials on ECLS highlights the need for randomized trials to guide the selection of patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and post-heart transplant outcomes among United States adults

BACKGROUND

Patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are given priority listing status for heart transplant (HT). Data on post-HT outcomes for adults with ECMO support at the time of HT are limited.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Registry (UNOS) registry for 157 ECMO-supported adults (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing HT after January 1, 2000. Data at the time of HT were examined for their association with post-transplant mortality using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Patients (69.4% males; mean age, 46.0 ± 15.6 years; 15.9% African Americans) were monitored for median of 0.55 years (interquartile range, 0.04-4.5). Seventy patients (44.6%) died during follow-up (survival at 1 year was 57.8%), of which 43 (61.4%) died within 30 days post-HT. For patients surviving the first 30 days after transplant, long-term survival was acceptable (82.3% at 1 year and 76.2% at 5 years). Prevalence of immediate post-HT complications, such as stroke and need for dialysis, were 10.1% and 28.1%, respectively. Post-HT survival did not differ between those who received an allograft before and after January 1, 2009 (univariate hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.38; p = 0.48). Among the predictors identified for 30-day and long-term mortality were recipient history of renal insufficiency (RI; defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 ml/min/1.73 m² or dialysis) and mechanical ventilation (MV; interaction p < 0.05); those with both MV and RI had significantly poorer post-transplant survival (29.4% and 12.5% for 30-day and 1-year survival, respectively) compared with those without (78.7% and 71.4% for 30-day and 1-year survival, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-HT mortality did not change for ECMO-supported adults in the contemporary era, and those with RI and MV had significantly poorer post-transplant survival. A critical review of priority listing status for ECMO-supported patients is warranted for optimal allocation and outcomes of cardiac allografts.

Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has revolutionized treatment of severe isolated or combined failure of lung and heart. Due to remarkable technical development the frequency of use is growing fast, with increasing adoption by interventional cardiologists independent of cardiac surgery. Nevertheless, ECMO support harbors substantial risk such as bleeding, thromboembolic events and infection. Percutaneous ECMO circuits usually comprise cannulation of two large vessels ('dual' cannulation), either veno-venous for respiratory and veno-arterial for circulatory support. Recently experienced centers apply more advanced strategies by cannulation of three large vessels ('triple' cannulation), resulting in veno-veno-arterial or veno-arterio-venous cannulation. While the former intends to improve drainage and unloading, the latter represents a very potent method to provide circulatory and respiratory support at the same time. As such triple cannulation expands the field of application at the expense of increased complexity of ECMO systems. Here, we review percutaneous dual and triple cannulation strategies for different clinical scenarios of the critically ill. As there is no unifying terminology to date, we propose a nomenclature which uses "A" and all following letters for supplying cannulas and all letters before "A" for draining cannulas. This general and unequivocal code covers both dual and triple ECMO cannulation strategies (VV, VA, VVA, VAV). Notwithstanding the technical evolution, current knowledge of ECMO support is mainly based on observational experience and mostly retrospective studies. Prospective controlled trials are urgently needed to generate evidence on safety and efficacy of ECMO support in different clinical settings.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Applications in Cardiac Critical Care

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (ECMO) in cardiac critical care has steadily increased over the past decade. Significant improvements in the technology associated with ECMO have propagated this recent resurgence and contributed to improved patient outcomes in the fields of cardiac and transplant (heart and lung) surgery. Specifically, ECMO is being increasingly utilized as a bridge to heart and lung transplantation, as well as to ventricular assist device placement. ECMO is also employed during the administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, known as extracorporeal life support. In this review, we examine the recent literature regarding the applications of ECMO and also describe emerging topics involving current ECMO management strategies.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults With Cardiac Arrest

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the use of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival with minimal neurologic impairment remain low. Utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for CA in adults is steadily increasing. Propensity-matched cohort studies have reported outcomes associated with ECMO use to be superior to that of conventional CPR alone in in-hospital patients with CA. In this review, we discuss the mechanism, indications, complications, and evidence for ECMO in CA in adults.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of life support that targets the heart and lungs. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure accesses and returns blood from the venous system and provides non-pulmonary gas exchange. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe cardiac failure or for refractory cardiac arrest (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)) provides gas exchange and systemic circulation. The configuration of ECMO is variable, and several pump-driven and pump-free systems are in use. Use of ECMO is associated with several risks. Patient-related adverse events include haemorrhage or extremity ischaemia; circuit-related adverse effects may include pump failure, oxygenator failure and thrombus formation. Use of ECMO in newborns and infants is well established, yet its clinical effectiveness in adults remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine whether use of veno-venous (VV) or venous-arterial (VA) ECMO in adults is more effective in improving survival compared with conventional respiratory and cardiac support.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid) and EMBASE (Ovid) on 18 August 2014. We searched conference proceedings, meeting abstracts, reference lists of retrieved articles and databases of ongoing trials and contacted experts in the field. We imposed no restrictions on language or location of publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs that compared adult ECMO versus conventional support.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of all retrieved citations against the inclusion criteria. We independently reviewed full-text copies of studies that met the inclusion criteria. We entered all data extracted from the included studies into Review Manager. Two review authors independently performed risk of bias assessment. All included studies were appraised with respect to random sequence generation, concealment of allocation, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting and other bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs that randomly assigned 389 participants with acute respiratory failure. Risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in one RCT. We found no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality at six months (two RCTs) or before six months (during 30 days of randomization in one trial and during hospital stay in another RCT). The quality of the evidence was low to moderate, and further research is very likely to impact our confidence in the estimate of effects because significant changes have been noted in ECMO applications and treatment modalities over study periods to the present.Two RCTs supplied data on disability. In one RCT survival was low in both groups but none of the survivors had limitations in their daily activities six months after discharge. The other RCT reported improved survival without severe disability in the intervention group (transfer to an ECMO centre ± ECMO) six months after study randomization but no statistically significant differences in health-related quality of life.In three RCTs, participants in the ECMO group received greater numbers of blood transfusions. One RCT recorded significantly more non-brain haemorrhage in the ECMO group. Another RCT reported two serious adverse events in the ECMO group, and another reported three adverse events in the ECMO group.Clinical heterogeneity between studies prevented meta-analyses across outcomes. We found no completed RCT that had investigated ECMO in the context of cardiac failure or arrest. We found one ongoing RCT that examined patients with acute respiratory failure and two ongoing RCTs that included patients with acute cardiac failure (arrest).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remains a rescue therapy. Since the year 2000, patient treatment and practice with ECMO have considerably changed as the result of research findings and technological advancements over time. Over the past four decades, only four RCTs have been published that compared the intervention versus conventional treatment at the time of the study. Clinical heterogeneity across these published studies prevented pooling of data for a meta-analysis.We recommend combining results of ongoing RCTs with results of trials conducted after the year 2000 if no significant shifts in technology or treatment occur. Until these new results become available, data on use of ECMO in patients with acute respiratory failure remain inconclusive. For patients with acute cardiac failure or arrest, outcomes of ongoing RCTs will assist clinicians in determining what role ECMO and ECPR can play in patient care.