Sharing kidneys across donor-service area boundaries with sensitized candidates can be influenced by HLA C

The novel HLA-C*06:325 allele identified in a Korean individual awaiting kidney transplantation

HLA-C*06:325 differs from HLA-C*06:02:01:01 by a non-synonymous nucleotide substitution in codon 145, changing Arginine to Histidine. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The HLA-C*03:539 allele identified in a kidney transplantation recipient

The novel HLA-C*03:539 allele differs from HLA-C*03:04:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 26.

Clinical relevance of donor-specific antibodies directed at HLA-C: A long road to acceptance

In solid organ transplantation (SOT), the clinical relevance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) directed at anti-HLA-A, -B, -DR and -DQ antigens is largely recognized while it is still a matter of debate for DSA directed at HLA-C. In this review, we summarize the peculiarities of HLA-C among class I HLA antigens as well as their immunogenicity, which underlie the clinical relevance of HLA-C locus and anti-HLA-C DSA in SOT. Many factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the HLA-C gene and HLA-C protein, explain its lower expression in comparison with HLA-A and -B. This lower expression can explain the apparent lower immunogenicity of HLA-C leading to a lower prevalence and strength of anti-HLA-C antibodies. Nevertheless, HLA-C antigens are truly immunogenic and preformed anti-HLA-C DSA are clinically relevant. Indeed, anti-HLA-C DSA are able to bind donor cells and to activate the complement pathway both ex vivo and in vivo. In line with this, numerous clinical studies now show that preformed DSA directed at native HLA-C molecules induce poorer graft outcomes. We then plead for the inclusion of HLA-C in all transplant allocation systems and we propose a strategy to cope with anti-HLA-C DSA in SOT. Beyond SOT, anti-HLA-C antibodies generate a growing interest in the allo-HCT, transfusion and obstetrics fields, while new concepts such as the role of the "missing-self" in solid organ rejection places HLA-C as an inescapable actor in transplant tolerance.

A curious case of de novo anti-HLA-C antibody-mediated humoral rejection and Fabry-like zebra bodies in a renal transplant recipient

Detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is an essential part of diagnosing antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection (ABMR). The role of solitary preformed, or post-transplant HLA-C antigens in solid organ transplantation is unclear, due to the less sensitive nature of the historical assays, lack of data, low expression level on the cell surface, and their co-existence with other anti-HLA DSA. Herein, we present the case of a 39-year-old African American man, without prior history of pre-transplant sensitization that was diagnosed with biopsy-proven ABMR due to de novo donor-specific anti-HLA-C antibodies. This case report illustrates the role of HLA-C antibodies in causing ABMR if generated toward immunogenic-shared epitopes and demonstrates the need for their recognition in the pre- and post-transplant period. Another interesting aspect of this case is the incidental finding of Fabry-like zebra bodies, which we eventually determined to be of unclear etiology.

Impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies against HLA class I on kidney graft outcomes: Comparative analysis of exclusively anti-Cw vs anti-A and/or -B antibodies

AIM

To analyze the clinical impact of preformed antiHLA-Cw vs antiHLA-A and/or -B donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Retrospective study, comparing 12 patients transplanted with DSA exclusively antiHLA-Cw with 23 patients with preformed DSA antiHLA-A and/or B.

RESULTS

One year after transplantation there were no differences in terms of acute rejection between the two groups (3 and 6 cases, respectively in the DSA-Cw and the DSA-A-B groups; P = 1). At one year, eGFR was not significantly different between groups (median 59 mL/min in DSA-Cw group, compared to median 51 mL/min in DSA-A-B group, P = 0.192). Moreover, kidney graft survival was similar between groups at 5-years (100% in DSA-Cw group vs 91% in DSA-A-B group, P = 0.528). The sole independent predictor of antibody mediated rejection (AMR) incidence was DSA strength (HR = 1.07 per 1000 increase in MFI, P = 0.034). AMR was associated with shortened graft survival at 5-years, with 75% and 100% grafts surviving in patients with or without AMR, respectively (Log-rank P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that DSA-Cw are associated with an identical risk of AMR and impact on graft function in comparison with “classical” class I DSA.

Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen

Allorecognition is the activation of the adaptive immune system to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) resulting in the generation of alloantibodies. Due to a high polymorphism, foreign HLA is recognized by the immune system following transplant, transfusion, or pregnancy resulting in the formation of the germinal center and the generation of long-lived alloantibody-producing memory B cells. Alloantibodies recognize antigenic epitopes displayed by the HLA molecule on the transplanted allograft and contribute to graft damage through multiple mechanisms, including (1) activation of the complement cascade resulting in the formation of the MAC complex and inflammatory anaphylatoxins, (2) transduction of intracellular signals leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, growth, and proliferation of graft vasculature, and (3) immune cell infiltration into the allograft via FcγR interactions with the FC portion of the antibody. This review focuses on the generation of HLA alloantibody, routes of sensitization, alloantibody specificity, and mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft damage.

Clinical relevance of circulating antibodies and B lymphocyte markers in allograft rejection

The main challenge in solid organ transplantation remains to tackle antibody-mediated rejection. Our understanding of the antibody-mediated response and the capacity to detect it has improved in the last decade. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the current clinical tools to monitor B cell activation are perfectible. New strategies, including the refinement in the characterization of HLA and non-HLA antibodies, as well as a better understanding of the circulating B cell phenotype will hopefully help to non-invasively identify patients at risk or undergoing antibody-mediated allograft damage. The current review discusses the current knowledge of the B cell biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, with a focus on circulating antibodies and peripheral B cells.

Risk of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients with anti-HLA-C donor-specific antibodies

Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) cause acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, the clinical relevance of anti-HLA-C antibodies remains unclear. We evaluated the clinical relevance of the presence of anti-HLA-C DSA at day 0 in renal transplant recipients. In this retrospective, case-controlled study, 608 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between August 2008 and March 2012 were screened for the presence of isolated anti-HLA-C DSA at day 0. A total of 22 renal transplant recipients were selected and followed for a period of 1 year. AMR was classified according to the Banff classification. The 22 patients were compared with 88 immunized patients. Acute AMR was diagnosed in six patients (27.3%). The median level of DSA at day 0 was 1179 (530-17,941). The mean fluorescence intensity in the anti-C group was 4966 (978-17,941) in the AMR group and 981 (530-8012) in the group of patients without AMR. Acute AMR was diagnosed less frequently in the 88 immunized individuals (9.1%) than in the DSA anti-C group (p = 0.033). The level of DSA at day 0 was predictive for AMR (p = 0.017). Patients with a high level of pretransplant anti-HLA-C DSAs are likely to develop acute AMR during the first year after transplantation.

Pretransplant anti-HLA-Cw and anti-HLA-DP antibodies in sensitized patients

We investigated the prevalence and the strength of anti-HLA-Cw and DP antibodies and clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with isolated donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies. Patients on the waiting list were screened by Luminex single antigen beads (One Lambda). The strength of antibodies was determined by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of the beads. Of the 1069 patients on the waiting list, 251 (24%) were sensitized with calculated panel reactive antibody >0%. The frequency and the median MFI values of anti-HLA antibodies to Cw (56%, 4955) and DP (35%, 2945) were lower than anti-HLA-A (79%, 10,194), B (86%, 11,235), DR (66%, 7866) and DQ (69%, 8283) (p<0.01). Among three major sensitizing events, only previous transplant was associated with development of all anti-HLA antibodies and history of pregnancy was associated only with development of anti-HLA-A antibodies. Eight patients with donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies received transplantation. During a median 6 months of follow-up (range 3-24 months), patient and graft survival was 100% without any acute rejection. In summary, the prevalence and the strength of anti-HLA-Cw and HLA-DP were lower compared to anti-HLA-A, B, DR, and DQ antibodies and previous organ transplantation was the main sensitizing event in our cohort of patients.

Luminex and antibody detection in kidney transplantation

Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies have a negative effect on kidney transplantation outcome with an increased rejection rate and reduction in survival. Posttransplantation production of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is indicative of an active immune response and risk of transplantation rejection. For many years the primary technique for anti-HLA antibody detection was complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which has been integrated by solid-phase assays as HLA antigen-coated bead methods (Luminex). This new technological approach has allowed identification of anti-HLA antibodies, not detectable using conventional CDC method, in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Moreover, use of Luminex technology has enabled better definition of acceptable or unacceptable antigens favoring transplantation in highly immunized patients. However, there are still many unresolved issues, including the clinical relevance of antibodies detected with this system.

The evolution and clinical impact of human leukocyte antigen technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As human leukocyte (HLA) antigen and antibody testing has evolved, typing, screening, and crossmatching assays have become exquisitely specific and sensitive. How best to use this information is a focal point of the transplant community and of this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Driven by advances in technology, two major changes in the transplant community recently occurred. Firstly, the United Network for Organ Sharing mandated the use of cPRA to replace the more subjective panel reactive antibody value. Secondly, the virtual crossmatch (vXM) became a reality. The vXM categorizes sensitized patients as compatible or incompatible with their donors by predicting the likelihood of a positive crossmatch. Although the use of cPRA and vXM represents major progress in organ allocation algorithms, there are compelling issues that must be addressed. These include defining appropriate threshold values for antibody assignment and recognizing the relevance of antibodies to HLA-Cw*, HLA-DQ*, and HLA-DP*.

SUMMARY

Undoubtedly, molecular HLA-typing and solid-phase antibody-detection assays have revolutionized clinical histocompatibility testing. These new testing methodologies have had a major impact in both allocation and outcome of transplanted kidneys. However, even these new methodologies are not flawless and pose new challenges to the transplant community.

Detection of antibodies against HLA-C epitopes in patients with rejected kidney transplants

BACKGROUND

Although HLA-C matching is not considered in kidney transplantation, several reports have shown that anti-HLA-C antibodies are associated with rejection and graft failure. DNA-based typing methods can now accurately determine HLA-C compatibility and sensitive assays such as Luminex with single alleles can identify HLA-C antibodies. HLA-C displays considerable amino acid polymorphism that can be translated into a structurally defined epitope repertoire.

METHODS

We have analyzed post-allograft nephrectomy sera from 45 HLA-C mismatched cases submitted by 15 laboratories worldwide participating in the 15th International Histocompatibility Workshop. All of them had HLA class I antibodies detected by a Luminex-based solid phase method using single-allele beads. This study addressed the determination of antibodies against donor HLA-C mismatches. Analysis of antibody reactivity patterns was performed using HLAMatchmaker, a structurally based matching program that considers 56 HLA-C eplets to define antibody-reactive epitopes. Many eplets shared by groups of HLA-C antigens, whereas others are also shared with HLA-A and/or HLA-B antigens.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (60%) had donor-specific HLA-C antibodies, significantly less than the donor-specific antibodies induced by HLA-A and HLA-B mismatches. HLA-C antibody responses correlated with the eplet loads of the HLA-C mismatches. There were 352 instances whereby a donor HLA-C eplet was mismatched and for 84 (24%) of them there was antibody reactivity with a particular eplet (69 instances) or an eplet pair (15 instances). The latter generally consisted of mismatched eplets paired with self-eplets shared between the immunizing HLA-C alleles and HLA alleles of the patient. Several HLA-C eplets exhibited a relatively high immunogenicity as evidenced by their frequencies of specific antibodies.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate the importance of HLA-C mismatching in humoral sensitization and that HLA-C epitopes can induce specific antibodies. They illustrate the usefulness of HLAMatchmaker in understanding donor-specific antibody reactivity patterns and the determination of HLA mismatch acceptability when transplantation is considered.