1
|
Sheng LP, Zhang JC, Zhong ZQ, Sheng XH, Ren J, Wang GQ. High-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues alone or plus immunoglobulin for HBV prophylaxis after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Hepatol Int 2023; 17:1113-1124. [PMID: 36592270 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10466-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum prophylactic regimen against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-infected patients is uncertain but of great clinical relevance. New evidence suggests that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-free approach would become a reasonable choice in the era of high-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues (HPNAs). We aimed to provide robust estimates for long-term survival and HBV recurrence in patients receiving different HBV-prophylaxis strategies after LT. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using both pseudo-individual patient data recovered from included studies (IPDMA) and conventional trial-level aggregate data meta-analysis (ADMA). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using different Cox proportional hazard models accounting for inter-study heterogeneity. ADMA was conducted to pool outcomes at specific time points. RESULTS A total of 16 studies involving 7897 patients and 41 studies involving 9435 were eligible for IPDMA and AMDA, respectively. Cumulative HBV recurrence rate and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years post-LT were 0.3%, 0.9%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 95.6%, 89%, 86.4%, 86.4% in the HPNAs (i.e., entecavir and tenofovir) + HBIG combination group vs. 0.6%, 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 94.5%, 86.8%, 84.8%, 81.2% in the HPNAs monotherapy group (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.60, p = 0.64; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, p = 0.72), respectively. The results were compatible with AMDA. CONCLUSION A similar HBV recurrence and overall survival were found in patients who used HPNAs (mainly entecavir) monotherapy as in those who received a combination of HPNAs and HBIG. These findings address concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of HPNAs monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ping Sheng
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Center for Liver Diseases, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Jun-Chang Zhang
- Intensive Care Unit, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Zhong
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue-Han Sheng
- The First Clinical Medical College of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jing Ren
- Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Gui-Qiang Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Center for Liver Diseases, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Higuera-de-la-Tijera F, Castro-Narro GE, Velarde-Ruiz Velasco JA, Cerda-Reyes E, Moreno-Alcántar R, Aiza-Haddad I, Castillo-Barradas M, Cisneros-Garza LE, Dehesa-Violante M, Flores-Calderón J, González-Huezo MS, Márquez-Guillén E, Muñóz-Espinosa LE, Pérez-Hernández JL, Ramos-Gómez MV, Sierra-Madero J, Sánchez-Ávila JF, Torre-Delgadillo A, Torres R, Marín-López ER, Kershenobich D, Wolpert-Barraza E. Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología A.C. Clinical guideline on hepatitis B. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2021; 86:403-432. [PMID: 34483073 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to be a worldwide public health problem. In Mexico, at least three million adults are estimated to have acquired hepatitis B (total hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive), and of those, 300,000 active carriers (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive) could require treatment. Because HBV is preventable through vaccination, its universal application should be emphasized. HBV infection is a major risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Semi-annual liver ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein testing favor early detection of that cancer and should be carried out in all patients with chronic HBV infection, regardless of the presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Currently, nucleoside/nucleotide analogues that have a high barrier to resistance are the first-line therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Higuera-de-la-Tijera
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico
| | - G E Castro-Narro
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - J A Velarde-Ruiz Velasco
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - E Cerda-Reyes
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Central Militar, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R Moreno-Alcántar
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - I Aiza-Haddad
- Clínica de Enfermedades Hepáticas, Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M Castillo-Barradas
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional "La Raza", IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - L E Cisneros-Garza
- Centro de Enfermedades Hepáticas, Hospital San José, Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - M Dehesa-Violante
- Fundación Mexicana para la Salud Hepática A.C. (FUNDHEPA), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J Flores-Calderón
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Pediatría del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M S González-Huezo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, ISSSEMYM, Metepec, Estado de México, Mexico
| | - E Márquez-Guillén
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico
| | - L E Muñóz-Espinosa
- Clínica de Hígado, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - J L Pérez-Hernández
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M V Ramos-Gómez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J Sierra-Madero
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J F Sánchez-Ávila
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - A Torre-Delgadillo
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R Torres
- Hospital de Infectología del Centro Médico Nacional "La Raza", IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - D Kershenobich
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Higuera-de-la-Tijera F, Castro-Narro GE, Velarde-Ruiz Velasco JA, Cerda-Reyes E, Moreno-Alcántar R, Aiza-Haddad I, Castillo-Barradas M, Cisneros-Garza LE, Dehesa-Violante M, Flores-Calderón J, González-Huezo MS, Márquez-Guillén E, Muñóz-Espinosa LE, Pérez-Hernández JL, Ramos-Gómez MV, Sierra-Madero J, Sánchez-Ávila JF, Torre-Delgadillo A, Torres R, Marín-López ER, Kershenobich D, Wolpert-Barraza E. Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología A.C. Clinical guideline on hepatitis B. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2021; 86:S0375-0906(21)00061-6. [PMID: 34384668 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to be a worldwide public health problem. In Mexico, at least three million adults are estimated to have acquired hepatitis B (total hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive), and of those, 300,000 active carriers (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive) could require treatment. Because HBV is preventable through vaccination, its universal application should be emphasized. HBV infection is a major risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Semi-annual liver ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein testing favor early detection of that cancer and should be carried out in all patients with chronic HBV infection, regardless of the presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Currently, nucleoside/nucleotide analogues that have a high barrier to resistance are the first-line therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Higuera-de-la-Tijera
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Ciudad de México, México
| | - G E Castro-Narro
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, México.
| | - J A Velarde-Ruiz Velasco
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara «Fray Antonio Alcalde», Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - E Cerda-Reyes
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Central Militar, Ciudad de México, México
| | - R Moreno-Alcántar
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, México
| | - I Aiza-Haddad
- Clínica de Enfermedades Hepáticas, Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Ciudad de México, México
| | - M Castillo-Barradas
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional «La Raza», IMSS, Ciudad de México, México
| | - L E Cisneros-Garza
- Centro de Enfermedades Hepáticas, Hospital San José, Nuevo León, Monterrey, México
| | - M Dehesa-Violante
- Fundación Mexicana para la Salud Hepática A.C. (FUNDHEPA), Ciudad de México, México
| | - J Flores-Calderón
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Pediatría del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, México
| | - M S González-Huezo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, ISSSEMYM, Metepec, Estado de México, México
| | - E Márquez-Guillén
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, México
| | - L E Muñóz-Espinosa
- Clínica de Hígado, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José E. González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | - J L Pérez-Hernández
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Ciudad de México, México
| | - M V Ramos-Gómez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Centro Médico Nacional «20 de Noviembre», ISSSTE, Ciudad de México, México
| | - J Sierra-Madero
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, México
| | - J F Sánchez-Ávila
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Ciudad de México, México
| | - A Torre-Delgadillo
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, México
| | - R Torres
- Hospital de Infectología del Centro Médico Nacional «La Raza», IMSS, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - D Kershenobich
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, México
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li MS, Hou ZH, Yao GZ, Tan DM. The strategy and efficacy of prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation for HBV-related diseases in the era of potent nucleos(t)ide analogues: A meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:91-101. [PMID: 33128339 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of liver transplant (LT) recipients under potent nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA)-based regimens and investigate different prophylactic schemes. METHODS We followed PRISMA statement to conduct this study. Two reviewers independently searched relevant literature via PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science and Insightmeme. Studies were included if they evaluated hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence under potent NA-based regimens in patients who received HBV-related LT. Primary and secondary outcomes were HBV recurrence, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence, all-cause and HBV recurrence-related mortality. Incidences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and assessed by fixed and random effects models. Subgroup analyses were used to examine the impact of different treatment strategies. RESULTS Altogether 25 studies (N = 2327) were included, with a pooled HBV recurrence rate of 1.01% (95% CI 0.53%-1.59%). HBV viremia or hepatitis D virus superinfection did not influence HBV recurrence significantly (P = 0.23 and 0.71, respectively). The recurrence rate under an indefinite combination of potent NA and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was lower than that under potent NA monotherapy (P = 0.000) and similar to that under NA plus a finite course of HBIG (P = 0.48). The pooled HCC recurrence rate was 5.34% (95% CI 0.78%-12.48%). HBV recurrence-related mortality and all-cause mortality were 0% and 6.95% (95% CI 4.30%-10.08%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Potent NA-based regimens provide satisfactory HBV antiviral prophylaxis and improve long-term outcomes for LT recipients. A finite combination of potent NA and HBIG is an alternative to life-long dual therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Shu Li
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Zhou Hua Hou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Guo Zhu Yao
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - De Ming Tan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng JN, Zou TT, Zou H, Zhu GQ, Ruan LY, Cheng Z, Van Poucke S, Zheng MH. Comparative efficacy of oral nucleotide analogues for the prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2016; 14:979-87. [PMID: 27491868 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1220831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic nucleos(t)ide anologues against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) include lamivudine, entecavir, tenofovir, adefovir. Since the most effective strategies for post-LT remain inconclusive, we aimed to compare 6 different treatment options (lamivudine, entecavir, tenofovir, adefovir, lamivudine plus adefovir, lamivudine plus tenofovir) in terms of HBV recurrence after LT using network meta-analysis. METHODS The search identified seventeen studies involving 6 different prophylactic regimens covering 7274 patients. RESULTS Compared with entecavir, lamivudine plus tenofovir (OR 2.00, 95%CI 0.02-183.29), lamivudine plus adefovir, (OR 2.83, 95%CI 0.18-33.57), tenofovir (OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.22-5.80), adefovir (OR 3.78, 95%CI 0.59-22.16), lamivudine (OR 4.62, 95%CI 1.75-11.39) were associated with an increased risk of HBV recurrence. CONCLUSION Entecavir resulted with the highest probability (31%) as the best prophylactic option on reducing the risk of HBV recurrence. Entecavir is the preferred oral NAs treatment compared to other five different prophylactic regimens in the prevention of HBV recurrence after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Na Zheng
- a Department of Hepatology, Liver Research Center , the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.,b School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Tian-Tian Zou
- a Department of Hepatology, Liver Research Center , the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.,c School of the Second Clinical Medical Sciences , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Hai Zou
- d Department of Infection Diseases , Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital , Hangzhou , China
| | - Gui-Qi Zhu
- a Department of Hepatology, Liver Research Center , the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.,b School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Lu-Yi Ruan
- a Department of Hepatology, Liver Research Center , the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.,b School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Zhang Cheng
- a Department of Hepatology, Liver Research Center , the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.,b School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Sven Van Poucke
- e Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy , Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg , Genk , Belgium
| | - Ming-Hua Zheng
- a Department of Hepatology, Liver Research Center , the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.,f Institute of Hepatology , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rational Basis for Optimizing Short and Long-term Hepatitis B Virus Prophylaxis Post Liver Transplantation: Role of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin. Transplantation 2016; 99:1321-34. [PMID: 26038873 PMCID: PMC4539198 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates, such as entecavir or tenofovir, suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and delay or obviate the need for liver transplantation in some patients. After liver transplantation, the combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in greater than 90% of transplant recipients. Some forms of HBV prophylaxis need to be continued indefinitely after transplantation but, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence (i.e., HBV DNA levels undetectable before transplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain only long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) therapy. A more cautious approach is necessary for those patients with high pretransplant HBV DNA levels, those with limited antiviral options if HBV recurrence occurs (i.e., HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, preexisting drug resistance), those with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and those at risk of noncompliance with antiviral therapy. In this group, HBIG-free prophylaxis cannot be recommended. The combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose Hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in > 90% of liver transplant recipients. In patients with low HBV DNA levels, nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) treatment without HBIG is possible.
Collapse
|
7
|
Singer GA, Zielsdorf S, Fleetwood VA, Alvey N, Cohen E, Eswaran S, Shah N, Chan EY, Hertl M, Fayek SA. Limited hepatitis B immunoglobulin with potent nucleos(t)ide analogue is a cost-effective prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 47:478-84. [PMID: 25769595 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) includes lifelong hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and oral antiviral agent(s). In the presence of high-genetic-barrier nucleos(t)ide analogues, the need for lifelong HBIG is questioned. We evaluated the safety and cost-effectiveness of a limited HBIG course. METHODS OLT from 2006 to 2013 were reviewed. Patients with pre-OLT hepatitis B virus surface antigen who received HBV prophylaxis with 2 HBIG doses (anhepatic and first post-operative day; 10,000 units/dose) and potent nucleos(t)ide analogues were included. The primary end point was HBV recurrence (HBV-DNA detection). RESULTS Thirteen patients (primary transplants) were included, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 18, and there was no fulminant failure; HBV-DNA was detected in 4 patients at OLT. After OLT, 10 patients received entecavir and/or tenofovir. Median follow-up was 23 months. One recurrence occurred (7.7%) at month 13 (HBV-DNA: 14 IU/mL); the graft maintained excellent function. This minimal viremic expression is related to hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence with neoplastic replication carrying integrated HBV-DNA; thus, there is no defined HBV viral recurrence. No graft loss or patient death was related to HBV recurrence. The 1-year patient and graft survival rate was 84.6%. Cost-savings in the first year was $178,100 per patient when compared with Food and Drug Administration-approved HBIG dosing. CONCLUSIONS In the era of potent oral nucleos(t)ide analogues, a limited HBIG course appears to be cost-effective in preventing HBV recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Singer
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - S Zielsdorf
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - V A Fleetwood
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - N Alvey
- Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - E Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hepatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - S Eswaran
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hepatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - N Shah
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hepatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - E Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - M Hertl
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - S A Fayek
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Molecular Mechanisms to Control Post-Transplantation Hepatitis B Recurrence. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:17494-513. [PMID: 26263973 PMCID: PMC4581205 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160817494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2015] [Revised: 07/25/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B often progresses to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although newer nucleos(t)ide analogues result in >90% viral and hepatitis activity control, severely decompensated patients still need OLT because of drug-resistant virus, acute exacerbation, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute hepatitis B is also an indication for OLT, because it can progress to fatal acute liver failure. After OLT, the hepatitis B recurrence rate is >80% without prevention, while >90% of transplant recipients are clinically controlled with combined hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost; therefore, several treatment protocols with low-dose HBIG, combined with nucleos(t)ide analogues, have been investigated. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using an HBV envelope (HBs) antigen vaccine. Patients who are not HBV carriers, such as those with acutely infected liver failure, are good candidates for vaccination. For chronic HBV carrier liver cirrhosis patients, a successful vaccine response can only be achieved in selected patients, such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols. The present protocol for post-OLT HBV control and the future prospects of newer treatment strategies are reviewed.
Collapse
|
9
|
EXP CLIN TRANSPLANTExp Clin Transplant 2015; 13. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2014.o78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
10
|
Xi ZF, Xia Q. Recent advances in prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:829-835. [PMID: 25624716 PMCID: PMC4299335 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2014] [Revised: 08/31/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related end-stage liver disease. However, without antiviral prophylaxis, the recurrence rate of hepatitis B is as high as 80%-100%, which leads to a 50% mortality rate in the first 2 years after liver transplantation. Combination therapy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine demonstrated a higher efficacy of prophylaxis and further reduced the rate of recurrence to < 10%. The strategy of HBIG combined with lamivudine has been the standard treatment in many centers. However, the high rate of lamivudine resistance and the many disadvantages of HBIG have compelled surgeons to reconsider the long-term efficacy of this strategy for the prevention of HBV reinfection. Recently, new nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as entecavir and tenofovir, have been approved as first-line monotherapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. These antiviral medicines have replaced lamivudine as the first choice in the prevention of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation. Various therapies that are composed of entecavir, tenofovir, and lamivudine plus adefovir, with or without HBIG have been adopted in several liver transplant centers. This article reviews the recent advances in prophylaxis for the recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Takaki A, Yagi T, Yamamoto K. Safe and cost-effective control of post-transplantation recurrence of hepatitis B. Hepatol Res 2015; 45:38-47. [PMID: 24905970 PMCID: PMC4309460 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Revised: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUC) is the current standard of care for controlling hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost, and thus several protocols for treatment with low-dose HBIG combined with NUC or HBIG-free regimens have been developed. This article reviews recent advances in post-OLT hepatitis B virus (HBV) control and future methodological directions. New NUC such as entecavir, tenofovir or lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil combinations induce a very low frequency of viral resistance. The withdrawal of HBIG after several months of OLT under new NUC continuation also has permissible effects. Even after HBV reactivation, NUC can usually achieve viral control when viral markers are strictly followed up. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-HBV antibodies via vaccination with a hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine. However, HBV vaccination is not sufficiently effective in patients to treat liver cirrhosis type B after OLT because immune tolerance to the virus has already continued for several decades. Trials of its safety and cost-effectiveness are required. This review advocates a safe and economical approach to controlling post-OLT HBV recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinobu Takaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan,Correspondence: Dr Akinobu Takaki, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Takahito Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Transplant and Surgical Oncology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Contradictory immune response in post liver transplantation hepatitis B and C. Int J Inflam 2014; 2014:814760. [PMID: 25215259 PMCID: PMC4158295 DOI: 10.1155/2014/814760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 08/10/2014] [Accepted: 08/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B and C often progress to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). After OLT, hepatitis B recurrence is clinically controlled with a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using a HBV envelope antigen vaccine. Patients who had not been HBV carriers such as acutely infected liver failure or who received liver from HBV self-limited donor are good candidate. For chronic HBV carrier patients, a successful response can only be achieved in selected patients such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols or received an anti-HBV adaptive memory carrying donor liver. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfects transplanted livers at a rate of >90%. HCV reinfected patients show different severities of hepatitis, from mild and slowly progressing to severe and rapidly progressing, possibly resulting from different adaptive immune responses. More than half the patients require interferon treatment, although the success rate is low and carries risks for leukocytopenia and rejection. Managing the immune response has an important role in controlling recurrent hepatitis C. This study aimed to review the adaptive immune response in post-OLT hepatitis B and C.
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Kasraianfard A, Watt KD, Lindberg L, Alexopoulos S, Rezaei N. HBIG Remains Significant in the Era of New Potent Nucleoside Analogues for Prophylaxis Against Hepatitis B Recurrence After Liver Transplantation. Int Rev Immunol 2014; 35:312-324. [DOI: 10.3109/08830185.2014.921160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
15
|
Kim YK, Kim SH, Lee SD, Park SJ. Clinical outcomes and risk factors of hepatitis B virus recurrence in patients who received prophylaxis with entecavir and hepatitis B immunoglobulin following liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014; 45:3052-6. [PMID: 24157034 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although entecavir (ETV) and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) have widely been used for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence following liver transplantation (OLT), there have been few studies about clinical outcomes and risk factors of HBV recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study retrospectively assessed clinical outcomes and identified risk factors of post-transplant HBV recurrence in 154 patients who received prophylaxis with both ETV and HBIG after OLT. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 28.0 months (range, 1.0-57.8). Post-transplant HBV recurrence occurred in 5 patients (3.2%) without any ETV-resistant mutants. The overall rates of HBV recurrence at 1, 2, and 4 years were 0.6%, 1.6%, and 6.2%, respectively. We found that recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was an independent risk factor of HBV recurrence (hazard ratio = 13.5, 95% confidence interval, 2.4-74.4; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis with a combination of ETV and HBIG resulted in a low HBV recurrence rate following OLT without any emergence of ETV-resistant mutants. Recurrent HCC was an independent risk factor of HBV recurrence in patients who received prophylaxis with both ETV and HBIG for prophylaxis following OLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y-K Kim
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gao YJ, Zhang M, Jin B, Meng FP, Ma XM, Liu ZW, Su HB, Zhao JM, Li HW. Clinical-pathological analysis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in Chinese patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29:554-60. [PMID: 24117714 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease can be complicated by HBV recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors, prophylaxis treatment, and histological characteristics of HBV recurrence after LT when using long-term, low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) plus nucleoside analog (lamivudine [LAM] or entecavir [ETV]). METHODS Retrospective data from 253 adult LT patients using long-term, low-dose HBIG plus nucleoside analog after LT, for a mean treatment duration of 1-72 months, were collected from a single center in Beijing, China. Univariate analyses were conducted to determine the association among gender, age, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatitis B e antigen-positive status, HBV-DNA level and tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutations on HBV recurrence in these patients. RESULTS Overall, the HBV recurrence rate was 6.32% (16/253). There was no significant difference in the survival rate between the HBV recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Risk factors for HBV recurrence were: hepatitis B e antigen positivity, HBV-DNA > 10(5) copies/mL, hepatocellular carcinoma, and YMDD mutation. Sixteen patients receiving LAM had HBV recurrence (16/169; mean treatment duration: 61.8 ± 18.3 months). No HBV recurrence occurred in patients receiving ETV after LT (0/84; mean treatment duration: 57.1 ± 15.9 months). Differences in rate of mortality and HBV recurrence were not significant between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS LT is an effective treatment for HBV-related end-stage liver disease. The combination of ETV and intramuscular HBIG for HBV recurrence prophylaxis after LT was more effective than LAM, especially in Chinese patients with HBV recurrence risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin-Jie Gao
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China; Department of Infectious Diseases, 302 Military Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang J. Clinical utility of entecavir for chronic hepatitis B in Chinese patients. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2013; 8:13-24. [PMID: 24376343 PMCID: PMC3865082 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s41423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The People's Republic of China has one of the highest rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This review summarizes recent data from studies of entecavir, one of the recommended first-line oral therapies for treating chronic hepatitis B, in Chinese HBV-infected patients. Long-term treatment with entecavir is efficacious and well tolerated, and studies comparing entecavir with other nucleos(t)ide therapies, such as lamivudine, adefovir, and telbivudine, demonstrate superior antiviral effects for entecavir therapy and comparable safety profiles. Entecavir monotherapy and combination treatment with other nucleos(t) ide analogs has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant and adefovir-resistant patients with HBV infection, as well as in patients with multidrug-resistant disease. Entecavir has also been shown to be effective in patients with HBV-associated clinical morbidity, including cirrhosis and liver failure, as well as in preventing recurrence of HBV following liver transplantation and in preventing reactivation of HBV after immunosuppres-sive therapy. Although the cost of anti-HBV therapy is a particular concern in the People's Republic of China, a number of studies have recently demonstrated that entecavir (particularly long-term therapy) represents a more cost-effective treatment strategy compared with other nucleos(t)ide therapies. Further research is required to assess the effects of entecavir combination therapy on hepatitis B surface antigen clearance, and in drug-resistant patients in the People's Republic of China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyao Wang
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Key Laboratory of Medical, Molecular Virology of MOE/MOH, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Perrillo R, Buti M, Durand F, Charlton M, Gadano A, Cantisani G, Loong CC, Brown K, Hu W, Lopez-Talavera JC, Llamoso C. Entecavir and hepatitis B immune globulin in patients undergoing liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B. Liver Transpl 2013; 19:887-95. [PMID: 23788462 PMCID: PMC3791551 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Accepted: 05/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
For patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease, the current standard of care for preventing reinfection of the allograft is nucleoside analogue therapy combined with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). Entecavir has demonstrated high efficacy and a favorable safety profile for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment, but data for patients undergoing HBV-related LT are limited. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of entecavir combined with various HBIG regimens after CHB-related LT. In this phase 3b, single-arm, open-label study, 65 patients undergoing LT for CHB-related liver disease with an HBV DNA load <172 IU/mL at LT received entecavir (1.0 mg daily) for 72 weeks after LT. The primary endpoint was the proportion of evaluable patients (treated for ≥4 weeks) with virological recurrence (HBV DNA level ≥50 IU/mL) through week 72. Concomitant HBIG therapy was received by 64 of the 65 enrolled patients, and 44% of these patients received high-dose HBIG (any HBIG dose in the specified interval ≥10,000 IU). Through week 72, all 61 patients evaluable for the efficacy analysis had undetectable HBV DNA. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of patients without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) recurrence at week 72 was 0.9655. Two patients experienced a reappearance of HBsAg, but both remained HBV DNA(-) until the last follow-up. The frequency and nature of adverse events were consistent with those expected for this patient population. Serum creatinine increments ≥0.3 mg/dL and ≥0.5 mg/dL occurred in 62% and 39% of the patients, respectively, and all of these patients received calcineurin inhibitor therapy. In conclusion, in this population of patients treated with entecavir after CHB-related LT, entecavir was well tolerated and effective in maintaining viral suppression, even in individuals who experienced a reappearance of HBsAg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Perrillo
- Hepatology Division, Baylor University Medical CenterDallas, TX,Hepatology Division, Baylor University Medical Center, 3410 Worth St., Dallas, TX 75246. Telephone: 214-820-2956; FAX: 214-820-0993; E-mail:
| | - Maria Buti
- Liver Unit, Vall d’Hebron University General Hospital/Network Center for Biomedical Research in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases, Carlos III InstituteBarcelona, Spain
| | - Francois Durand
- Hepatology Service, National Institute of Health and Medical Research CRB3, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris VIIClichy, France
| | - Michael Charlton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo ClinicRochester, MN
| | - Adrian Gadano
- Hepatology Section, Italian Hospital of Buenos AiresBuenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Guido Cantisani
- Liver Transplantation Group, Santa Casa Hospital ComplexPorto Alegre, Brazil,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Che-Chuan Loong
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming UniversityTaipei, Taiwan
| | - Kimberly Brown
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyWallingford, CT
| | - Wenhua Hu
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyWallingford, CT
| | | | - Cyril Llamoso
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyWallingford, CT
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wesdorp DJW, Knoester M, Braat AE, Coenraad MJ, Vossen ACTM, Claas ECJ, van Hoek B. Nucleoside plus nucleotide analogs and cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin after liver transplantation in chronic hepatitis B is safe and effective. J Clin Virol 2013; 58:67-73. [PMID: 23880162 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Revised: 06/23/2013] [Accepted: 06/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in chronic hepatitis B (HBV), adequate prophylaxis for recurrence of HBV in the graft is mandatory. OBJECTIVES Evaluate safety of HBV prophylaxis with tenofovir and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) after cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) after OLT in chronic HBV. STUDY DESIGN In 17 consecutive patients after OLT in chronic HBV we started TDF/FTC after cessation of HBIG. All had received HBIG >6 months. 15/17 were HBsAg negative and 16/17 had undetectable HBV-DNA. RESULTS After mean follow-up of 2 years 16/17 patients were alive, one died due to urosepsis. All 16 with undetectable HBV-DNA remained HBV-DNA negative. From 15 HBsAg negative patients at start, in one seroconversion to positive HBsAg occurred, without detectable HBV-DNA. Liver biochemistry remained within the normal ranges. There were no cases of drug discontinuation. No major side effects were reported. TDF/FTC use saves €16,262/year over standard-of-care (HBIG+LAM). This prospective follow-up study shows that in liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B, after initial treatment including HBIG for at least 6 months combined with or followed by (dual) nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, TDF/FTC provides adequate prophylaxis against recurrent HBV infection without major side effects and leads to substantial cost savings over a regimen with HBIG. CONCLUSION Combined prophylaxis with TDF/ETV nucleoside plus nucleotide analogs and cessation of immunoglobulin after liver transplantation in chronic hepatitis B is safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J W Wesdorp
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV. High genetic barrier nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) for prophylaxis from hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a systematic review. Am J Transplant 2013; 13:353-62. [PMID: 23137006 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04315.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2012] [Revised: 09/03/2012] [Accepted: 09/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues [NA(s)] is considered as the standard of care for prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), but the optimal protocol is controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of the newer NAs with high genetic barrier (hgbNA) [i.e. entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF)] with or without HBIG as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT. In total, 519 HBV liver transplant recipients from 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and they were compared to those under lamivudine (LAM) and HBIG who had been selected in our previous review. Patients under HBIG and LAM developed HBV recurrence (115/1889 or 6.1%): (a) significantly more frequently compared to patients under HBIG and a hgbNA [1.0% (3/303), p < 0.001], and (b) numerically but not significantly more frequently compared to the patients who received a newer NA after discontinuation of HBIG [3.9% (4/102), p = 0.52]. The use of a hgbNA without any HBIG offered similar antiviral prophylaxis compared to HBIG and LAM combination, if the definition of HBV recurrence was based on HBV DNA detectability [0.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.11]. Our findings favor the use of HBIG and a hgbNA instead of HBIG and LAM combined prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cholongitas
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University Medical School, Hippokration General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carrion AF, Martin P, O’Brien C. Management of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Before and After Liver Transplantation: An Update. CURRENT HEPATITIS REPORTS 2012; 11:102-110. [DOI: 10.1007/s11901-012-0128-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
|