Duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation

Transplantation for type 1 diabetes: radiologist's primer on islet, pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation imaging

Whole-organ pancreas, pancreatic-kidney and islet transplantation are surgical therapeutic options for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. They can enable effective glycemic control, improve quality of life and delay/reduce the secondary complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Radiologists are integral members of the multidisciplinary transplantation team involved in these procedures, with multimodality imaging serving as the mainstay for early recognition and management of transplant related complications. This review highlights the transplantation procedures available for patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with a focus on the imaging appearance of transplantation-related complications.

Evolving Trends in the Management of Duodenal Leaks After Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience

Duodenal leaks (DL) contribute to most graft losses following pancreas transplantation. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing graft preservation approach versus upfront graft pancreatectomy in these patients. We reviewed all pancreas transplants performed in our institution between 2000 and 2020 and identified the recipients developing DL to compare based on their management: percutaneous drainage vs. operative graft preservation vs. upfront pancreatectomy. Of the 595 patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, 74 (12.4%) developed a duodenal leak with a median follow up of 108 months. Forty-five (61%) were managed by graft preservation strategies, with the rest being treated with upfront graft pancreatectomy. DL managed by graft preservation strategies had similar graft survival rates at 1 and 5-year compared to the matched cohort of population without DL (95% and 59% vs. 91% and 62%; p = 0.78). Multivariate analysis identified male recipient (OR: OR: 6.18; CI95%: 1.26-41.09; p = 0.04) to have higher odds of undergoing an upfront graft pancreatectomy. In appropriately selected recipients with DL, graft preservation strategies utilizing either interventional radiology guided percutaneous drainage or laparotomy with/without repair of leak can achieve comparable long-term graft survival rates compared to recipients without DL.

Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies.

RESULTS

Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.

Comparison of Outcomes and Survival of Two Cohorts of Patients with Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Latin American Hospital

Background

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a complex and demanding procedure with a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality. Advances in surgical techniques and organ preservation have introduced changes in care protocols. Two cohorts of patients receiving SPKT with two different protocols were compared to determine overall survival and pancreatic and renal graft failure-free survival.

Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted in two cohorts of SPKT recipient patients that underwent surgery between 2001 and 2021. Outcomes were compared in transplant patients between 2001 and 2011 (cohort 1; initial protocol) and 2012-2021 (cohort 2; improved protocol). In addition to the temporality, the cohorts were defined by a protocolization of technical aspects and medical management in cohort 2 (improved protocol), compared to a wide variability in the procedures carried out in cohort 1 (initial protocol). Overall survival and pancreatic and renal graft failure-free survival were the primary outcomes. These outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test.

Results

Fifty-five SPKT were performed during the study period: 32 in cohort 1 and 23 in cohort 2. In the survival analysis, an average of 2546 days (95% CI: 1902-3190) was found in cohort 1, while in cohort 2, it was 2540 days (95% CI: 2100-3204) (p > 0.05). Pancreatic graft failure-free survival had an average of 1705 days (95% CI: 1037-2373) in cohort 1, lower than the average in cohort 2 (2337 days; 95% CI: 1887-2788) (p = 0.016). Similarly, renal graft failure-free survival had an average of 2167 days (95% CI: 1485-2849) in cohort 1, lower than the average in cohort 2 (2583 days; 95% CI: 2159-3006) (p = 0.017).

Conclusions

This analysis indicates that pancreatic and renal graft failure-free survival associated with SPKT decreased significantly in cohort 2, with results related to improvements in the treatment protocol implemented in that cohort.

Endoscopic visualization of graft status in patients with pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Enteric drainage into the recipient duodenum in pancreas transplantation (PT) can identify the graft duodenum by endoscopy. This study aimed to identify the characteristic endoscopic findings associated with graft failure or acute rejection in patients with PT.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent PT with duodenoduodenostomy (DD) between January 2015 and August 2019. During this period, there were 44 PTs with DD in 42 patients; 122 endoscopies were performed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, pancreatic graft survival was 82% at a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 6-55 months). There were 8 graft failures and 10 acute rejections. In all 8 graft failures, a deep ulcer covered with fibrinous exudates of the graft duodenum was confirmed on endoscopy. Diffuse erythema inside the graft duodenum was observed in 8 of 10 acute rejections. The factors associated with acute rejection were elevated serum lipase level (OR 8.5, p = 0.02) and diffuse erythema inside the graft duodenum on endoscopy (OR 20.5, p < 0.01) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In PT with DD patients, graft failure can be visualized by endoscopy, and diffuse erythema inside the graft duodenum may be a finding of acute rejection.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Technical factors that minimize the occurrence of early graft failure in pancreas transplantation

Pancreatic transplantation is the only treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes resulting in long-term euglycemia without exogenous insulin. However, pancreatic transplantation has become debatable following the improvements in the results of islet transplantation and artificial pancreas. Therefore, surgeons who perform pancreas transplants require the best surgical technique that can minimize technical failure. We aimed to report our experiences with pancreatic transplantations. We transplanted 65 pancreatic grafts between 2015 and 2020. Except for one death due to hypoxic brain damage after surgery, no postoperative technical failure was observed. We usually perform duodeno-duodenal anastomosis using the transperitoneal approach, with retrocolic placement of the graft pancreas. There was no leakage from the duodenum even after immunologic graft failure. To prevent venous thrombosis, which is the most common cause of technical failure, we used the inferior vena cava for anastomosis and added graft venoplasty with a patch of donor vena cava or aortic interposition graft to the bench procedure; subsequently, there were no cases of technical failure due to thrombosis post-transplantation. Therefore, the 1-year graft survival (insulin-free) rate was more than 95%. The improving the surgical technique will maintain pancreatic transplantation as the best treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Evidence for Roux-en-Y Pancreatic Duct Drainage Versus Standard Anastomosis in Pancreatic Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic transplantation is usually performed simultaneously with renal transplantation in the setting of end-stage nephropathy and type 1 diabetes. Surgical methods for dealing with exocrine secretions include bladder drainage, direct duodenojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y (ReY) enteric drainage. Roux-en-Y may confer an advantage over duodenojejunostomy because it distances enteric content from the transplant duodenal anastomosis. We examined the effect of enteric drainage method on transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the UK transplant registry on 2172 consecutive pancreatic transplants. Early graft loss was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included return to theater, length of inpatient stay, readmission with pancreatitis, graft survival, and patient survival.

RESULTS

There was no protective effect of ReY drainage (early graft loss, 4.6% vs 3.1%, P = 0.30; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.52; P = 0.91). There was a significant association between ReY and return to theater, reflecting either the technique or indication for ReY (multivariate odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.06; P < 0.01). The effect of transplant center on graft survival was assessed and adjusted for.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of a protective benefit of ReY drainage over duodenojejunostomy, but there was an increased risk of return to theater.

CT fluoroscopy-guided pancreas transplant biopsies: a retrospective evaluation of predictors of complications and success rates

To identify predictors of biopsy success and complications in CT-guided pancreas transplant (PTX) core biopsy. We retrospectively identified all CT fluoroscopy-guided PTX biopsies performed at our institution (2000-2017) and included 187 biopsies in 99 patients. Potential predictors related to patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), PTX age, PTX volume) and procedure characteristics (biopsy depth, needle size, access path, number of samples, interventionalist's experience) were correlated with biopsy success (sufficient tissue for histologic diagnosis) and the occurrence of complications. Biopsy success (72.2%) was more likely to be obtained in men [+25.3% (10.9, 39.7)] and when the intervention was performed by an experienced interventionalist [+27.2% (8.1, 46.2)]. Complications (5.9%) occurred more frequently in patients with higher PTX age [OR: 1.014 (1.002, 1.026)] and when many (3-4) tissue samples were obtained [+8.7% (-2.3, 19.7)]. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed male gender [OR: 3.741 (1.736, 8.059)] and high experience [OR: 2.923 (1.255, 6.808)] (biopsy success) as well as older PTX age [OR: 1.019 (1.002, 1.035)] and obtaining many samples [OR: 4.880 (1.240, 19.203)] (complications) as independent predictors. Our results suggest that CT-guided PTX biopsy should be performed by an experienced interventionalist to achieve higher success rates, and not more than two tissue samples should be obtained to reduce complications. Caution is in order in patients with older transplants because of higher complication rates.

Multimodality imaging of pancreas-kidney transplants

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant remains a treatment option for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type 1, aimed at restoring normoglycemia, alleviating insulin dependency, avoiding diabetic nephropathy, and thereby improving the quality of life. Imaging remains critical in the assessment of these transplant grafts. Ultrasound with Doppler remains the primary imaging modality for establishing baseline assessment of the graft as well as for evaluating vascular, parenchymal, and perigraft complications. Noncontrast MR imaging is preferred over non-contrast CT for evaluation of parenchymal or perigraft complications in patients with decreased renal function, although contrast-enhanced CT/MR imaging may be obtained following multidisciplinary consultation in cases with high clinical and laboratory suspicion for graft dysfunction. Catheter angiography is reserved primarily for therapeutic intervention in suspected or confirmed vascular complications. An understanding of the surgical techniques and imaging appearance of a normal graft is crucial to identify potential complications and direct timely management. This article provides an overview of surgical techniques, normal imaging appearance, as well as the spectrum of imaging findings and potential complications in pancreas-kidney transplants.

Sonographic Detection and Evaluation of Thrombosis in a Patient With Recent Pancreas Transplant

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants are most commonly evaluated with sonography. Thorough understanding of the variety of surgical techniques, postoperative anatomy, and potential complications is necessary for proper diagnosis. A common complication following pancreas transplant surgery is venous thrombosis. In the presented case, sonography was able to demonstrate portosplenic thrombosis, and computed tomography angiography was used as a secondary means of imaging. Following treatment, sonography was used to follow the resolution of the thrombus, which facilitated survival of the pancreas graft.

Protocol Duodenal Graft Biopsies Aid Pancreas Graft Surveillance

BACKGROUND

Histological evaluation of the pancreas graft is usually done on demand resulting in significant delays. This analysis reports on endoscopic protocol duodenal graft biopsies at regular intervals to determine feasibility, safety, and monitoring benefits.

METHODS

Protocol duodenal graft biopsies in 27 consecutive pancreas transplants (10 simultaneous pancreas kidney [SPK], 17 pancreas after kidney [PAK]) with a follow-up of a minimum of 12 months were performed at days 14, 30, 90, 180, 360, 430. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center classification for intestinal rejection was used. C4d staining was performed when antibody-mediated rejection was suspected.

RESULTS

Overall patient and pancreas graft survival was 100% and 93% at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. One hundred sixty-seven endoscopic biopsy procedures were performed in 27 grafts without any complication. Biopsies revealed rejection in 3 (30%) SPK recipients and in 15 (82%) of PAK recipients as early as 14 days posttransplant. Two patients underwent PAK retransplantation diagnosed with acute rejection at day 180. All except 1 recipient being treated for rejection, showed histological improvement following antirejection treatment. Following transient treatment success, a total of 3 pancreas grafts were lost for immunological reason. One loss was immediate despite antirejection treatment, 1 secondary to nonresolving rejection at 7 months and the third due to recurrent rejection 15 months posttransplantation. Additionally, biopsies detected vascular (venous thrombosis) and overimmunosuppression (cytomegalovirus infection) complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol graft duodenal biopsies detect complications after whole-organ pancreas transplantation, are useful in guiding therapy, and carry potential for improving outcome.

Bladder Versus Enteric Drainage of Exocrine Secretions in Pancreas Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database

OBJECTIVES

The method for drainage of exocrine secretions in pancreas transplantation remains a matter of debate. Different methods have evolved over time. Most data on these methods are from single-center studies with small sample sizes. Larger studies have yielded conflicting results.

METHODS

Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on all adult subjects who received pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 were analyzed (n = 19,934). Subjects were divided into 3 groups: enteric drainage with Roux-en-Y (n = 4308), enteric drainage without Roux-en-Y (n = 11,145), and bladder drainage (n = 4481). Primary end points were patient and graft survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years.

RESULTS

There was a patient and graft survival advantage with enteric drainage without Roux-en-Y reconstruction compared with the other methods. This was consistent at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated increased graft and patient survival when comparing enteric drainage of the transplanted pancreas without Roux-en-Y reconstruction to enteric drainage with Roux-en-Y and bladder drainage at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years. Based on this study, we recommend enteric drainage without Roux-en-Y reconstruction as the method of choice in pancreas transplantation.

Surgery of pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The surgical techniques of pancreas transplantation have been evolving and significantly improved over time. This article discusses different current techniques and their modifications.

RECENT FINDING

At this time, the most commonly used technique is systemic venous drainage (for venous outflow) and enteric drainage (for management of exocrine pancreatic secretions). However, new modifications of established techniques such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage and venous drainage to the inferior vena cava continue to be introduced.

SUMMARY

This article provides a state-of the-art review of the most prevalent up-to-date surgical techniques as well as a synopsis of their specific risks and benefits. The article also provides the most current registry data regarding utilization of different surgical techniques in the United State and worldwide.

Outcomes in Pancreas Transplantation With Exocrine Drainage Through a Duodenoduodenostomy Versus Duodenojejunostomy

Until recently, pancreas transplantation has mostly been performed with exocrine drainage via duodenojejunostomy (DJ). Since 2012, DJ was substituted with duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in our hospital, allowing endoscopic access for biopsies. This study assessed safety profiles with DD versus DJ procedures and clinical outcomes with the DD technique in pancreas transplantation. DD patients (n = 117; 62 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK_DD ] and 55 pancreas transplantation alone [PTA_DD ] with median follow-up 2.2 years) were compared with DJ patients (n = 179; 167 SPK_DJ and 12 PTA_DJ ) transplanted in the period 1998-2012 (pre-DD era). Postoperative bleeding and pancreas graft vein thrombosis requiring relaparotomy occurred in 17% and 9% of DD patients versus 10% (p = 0.077) and 6% (p = 0.21) in DJ patients, respectively. Pancreas graft rejection rates were still higher in PTA_DD patients versus SPK_DD patients (p = 0.003). Hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss was 2.25 (95% CI 1.00, 5.05; p = 0.049) in PTA_DD versus SPK_DD recipients. In conclusion, compared with the DJ procedure, the DD procedure did not reduce postoperative surgical complications requiring relaparatomy or improve clinical outcomes after pancreas transplantation despite serial pancreatic biopsies for rejection surveillance. It remains to be seen whether better rejection monitoring in DD patients translates into improved long-term pancreas graft survival.

Pancreas transplantation: Advantages of a retroperitoneal graft position

INTRODUCTION

In the 50 years since the first pancreas transplant performed at the University of Minnesota, the surgical techniques employed have undergone many modifications. Techniques such as retroperitoneal graft placement have further improved the ability to reproduce the physiology of the «native» pancreas. We herein present our experience of a modified technique for pancreatic transplant, with the organ placed into a fully retroperitoneal position with systemic venous and enteric drainage of the graft by duodeno-duodenostomy.

METHODS

All pancreas transplantations performed between May 2016 and January 2017 were prospectively entered into our transplant database and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 transplants were performed using the retroperitoneal technique (6 men: median age of 41 years [IQR 36-54]). Median cold ischemia times was 10,30h [IQR 5,30-12,10]. The preservation solution used was Celsior (n=7), IGL-1 (n=2), and UW (n=1). No complications related to the new surgical technique were identified. In one patient, transplantectomy at 12h was performed due to graft thrombosis, probably related to ischemic conditions from a donor with prolonged cardio-respiratory arrest. Another procedure was aborted without completing the graft implant due to an intraoperative immediate arterial thrombosis in a patient with severe iliac atheromatosis. No primary pancreas non-function occurred in the remaining 8patients. The median hospital stay was 13,50 days [IQR 10-27].

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal graft placement appears feasible with easy access for dissection the vascular site; comfortable technical vascular reconstruction; and a decreased risk of intestinal obstruction by separation of the small bowel from the pancreas graft.

Preserving the Pancreas Graft: Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Duodenal Leaks in Enterically Drained Pancreas Allografts

BACKGROUND

Duodenal leak remains a major cause of morbidity and graft loss in pancreas transplant recipients. The role and efficacy of surgical and image-guided interventions to salvage enterically drained grafts with a duodenal leak has yet to be defined.

METHODS

We investigated the incidence, treatment, and outcome of duodenal leak in 426 pancreas transplantation recipients from 2000 to 2015.

RESULTS

Duodenal leak developed in 33 (7.8%) recipients after a median follow-up of 5.3 (range, 0.5-15.2) years. Most leaks occurred during the first year (n = 22; 67%), and most were located near the proximal and distal duodenal staple line. Graft pancreatectomy was performed in 8 patients as primary therapy because of unfavorable local and/or systemic conditions. Salvage was attempted in 25 patients using percutaneous drainage (n = 4), surgical drainage (n = 4), or surgical repair (n = 17). Percutaneous or surgical drainage failed to control the leak in 7 of these 8 patients, and all 7 ultimately required graft pancreatectomy for persistent leak and sepsis. Surgical repair salvaged 14 grafts, and 13 grafts continue to function after a median follow-up of 2.9 (range, 1.1-6.3) years after repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that in selected patients a duodenal leak can be repaired successfully and safely in enterically drained grafts.

Pancreas transplant imaging: how I do it

Pancreas transplantation aims to restore physiologic normoglycemia in diabetic patients with glomerulopathy and avoid or delay the onset of diabetic retinopathy and arteriopathy. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant is the most common approach, using a cadaveric pancreas donation in conjunction with either cadaveric or live donor renal transplant. Alternative techniques include pancreas after kidney transplant, in which the pancreas transplant is performed some years after renal transplant. Pancreas transplant alone is utilized rarely in diabetic patients with compensated renal function. Pancreas grafts have vascular and enteric connections that vary in their anatomic approach, and understanding of this is critical for imaging with ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging techniques are directed to display the pancreatic transplant arterial and venous vasculature, parenchyma, and intestinal drainage pathway. Critical vascular information includes venous thrombosis (partial or complete), arterial occlusion, or aneurysm. Parenchymal abnormalities are nonspecific and occur in pancreatitis, graft rejection, and subsequent graft ischemia. Peripancreatic fluid collections include hematoma/seroma, pseudocyst, and abscess. The latter two are related to pancreatitis, duct disruption, or leak from the duodenojejunostomy. An understanding of transplant anatomy and complications will lead to appropriate use of imaging techniques to diagnose or exclude important complications.

Duodenal leaks after pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage - characteristics and risk factors

Pancreas-kidney transplantation with enteric drainage has become a standard treatment in diabetic patients with renal failure. Leaks of the graft duodenum (DL) remain a significant complication after transplantation. We studied incidence and predisposing factors of DLs in both simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation. Between January 2002 and April 2013, 284 pancreas transplantations were performed including 191 SPK (67.3%) and 93 PAK (32.7%). Patient data were analyzed for occurrence of DLs, risk factors, leak etiology, and graft survival. Of 18 DLs (incidence 6.3%), 12 (67%) occurred within the first 100 days after transplantation. Six grafts (33%) were rescued by duodenal segment resection. Risk factors for a DL were PAK transplantation sequence (odds ratio 3.526, P = 0.008) and preoperative immunosuppression (odds ratio 3.328, P = 0.012). In the SPK subgroup, postoperative peak amylase as marker of preservation/reperfusion injury and recipient pretransplantation cardiovascular interventions as marker of atherosclerosis severity were associated with an increased incidence of DLs. CMV-mismatch constellations showed an increased incidence in the SPK subgroup, however without significance probability. Long-term immunosuppression in PAK transplantation is a major risk factor for DLs. Early surgical revision offers the chance of graft rescue.

Pancreas transplantation with enteroanastomosis to native duodenum poses technical challenges--but offers improved endoscopic access for scheduled biopsies and therapeutic interventions

To facilitate endoscopic access for rejection surveillance and stenting of the pancreas, we have abandoned the duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in favor of duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). From September 2012 to September 2013 we performed 40 PTx with DD; 20 solitary-PTx (S-PTx) and 20 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). We compared the outcomes with results from 40 PTx-DJ (10 S-PTx and 30 SPK) from the preceding era. The DD-enteroanastomoses were performed successfully. Endoscopic pancreas biopsies (endoscopic ultrasound examination [EUS]) yielded representative material in half of the cases. One exocrine fistula was treated by endoscopic stenting. PTxs-DD were associated with a higher rate of thrombosis compared to PTx-DJ (23% vs. 5%) and reoperations (48% vs. 30%), as well as inferior graft survival (80% vs. 88%). Time on waiting list, HLA A + B mismatches and reoperations were associated with graft loss. Only recipient age remained an independent predictor of patient death in multivariate analysis. PTx-DD showed a higher rate of thrombosis and inferior results, but facilitated a protocol biopsy program by EUS that was feasible and safe. Given that technical difficulties can be solved, the improved endoscopic access might confer long-term benefits, yet this remains to be proven.

125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage

Several exocrine drainage procedures have been successfully developed to perform pancreas transplantation (PT). Retroperitoneal graft placement allows exocrine drainage via direct duodenoduodenostomy (DD). This technique provides easy access for endoscopic surveillance and biopsy. A total of 241 PT procedures were performed in our centre between 2002 and 2012. DD was performed in 125 patients, and duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in 116 patients. We retrospectively compared our experience with these two types of enteric drainage, focusing on graft and patient survivals, as well as postoperative complications. With a mean follow-up of 59 months, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survivals. 14 (11%) of 125 cases in the DD group and 21 (18%) of 116 cases in the DJ group had pancreatic graft loss (P = 0.142). Graft thrombosis [5 (4%) vs. 18 (16%) P = 0.002], anastomotic insufficiency [2 (1.6%) vs. 8 (7%) P = 0.052] and relaparotomy [52 (41%) vs. 56 (48%) P = 0.29] occurred more frequently in the DJ group, whereas gastrointestinal bleeding [14 (11%) vs. 4 (3%) P = 0.026] occurred more often in the DD group. DD is a feasible and safe technique in PT, with no increase in enteric complications. It is equivalent to other established techniques and extends the feasibility of anastomotic sites, especially in recipients who have undergone a second transplantation.

Experience with 53 portal-duodenal drained solitary pancreas transplants

Systemic-enteric drainage is currently the most common technique for pancreas transplantation (PT). A novel alternative technique, portal-duodenal drainage (PDD), has potential physiological benefits and provides improved monitoring of the pancreatic graft. The current study describes 53 solitary PT procedures (43 pancreas after kidney and 10 pancreas transplant alone) using the PDD technique over the last three yr. This method resulted in one-yr patient survival at 96% and 83% graft survival. There were five cases (9.4%) of thrombosis, in which transplantectomy and two-layer closure of the native duodenum were performed. No fistulas were observed. Here, we demonstrate that the PDD technique in PT was as safe and effective as current techniques in clinical use.

Transplantation of the pancreas

Pancreas transplantation consistently induces insulin-independence in beta-cell-penic diabetic patients, but at the cost of major surgery and life-long immunosuppression. One year after grafting, patient survival rate now exceeds 95 % across recipient categories, while insulin independence is maintained in some 85 % of simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients and in nearly 80 % of solitary pancreas transplant recipients. The half-life of the pancreas graft currently averages 16.7 years, being the longest among extrarenal grafts, and substantially matching the one of renal grafts from deceased donors. The difference between expected (100 %) and actual insulin-independence rate is mostly explained by technical failure in the postoperative phase, and rejection in the long-term period. Death with a functioning graft remains a further major issue, especially in uremic patients who have undergone prolonged periods of dialysis. Refinements in graft preservation, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and prophylactic treatments are expected to further improve the results of pancreas transplantation.