Proposals for the angiotensin II receptor-bound conformation by comparative computer modeling of AII and cyclic analogs

Interaction of angiotensin II with the C-terminal 300-320 fragment of the rat angiotensin II receptor AT1a monitored by NMR

Interaction between angiotensin II (Ang II) and the fragment peptide 300-320 (fCT300-320) of the rat angiotensin II receptor AT1a was demonstrated by relaxation measurements, NOE effects, chemical shift variations, and CD measurements. The correlation times modulating dipolar interactions for the bound and free forms of Ang II were estimated by the ratio of the nonselective and single-selective longitudinal relaxation rates. The intermolecular NOEs observed in NOESY spectra between HN protons of 9Lys(fCT) and 6His(ang), 10Phe(fCT) and 8Phe(ang), HN proton of 3Tyr(fCT) and Halpha of 4Tyr(ang), 5Phe(fCT)Hdelta and Halpha of 4Tyr(ang) indicated that Ang II aromatic residues are directly involved in the interaction, as also verified by relaxation data. Some fCT300-320 backbone features were inferred by the CSI method and CD experiments revealing that the presence of Ang II enhances the existential probability of helical conformations in the fCT fragment. Restrained molecular dynamics using the simulated annealing protocol was performed with intermolecular NOEs as constraints, imposing an alpha-helix backbone structure to fCT300-320 fragment. In the built model, one strongly preferred interaction was found that allows intermolecular stacking between aromatic rings and forces the peptide to wrap around the 6Leu side chain of the receptor fragment.

Effect of 3-5 monocyclizations of angiotensin II and 4-aminoPhe6-Ang II on AT2 receptor affinity

The endogenous angiotensin II (Ang II) and the synthetic AT(2) selective agonist 4-aminoPhe(6)-Ang II respond very differently to identical cyclizations. Cyclizations of Ang II by thioacetalization, involving the 3 and 5 amino acid residue side chains, provided ligands with almost equipotent binding affinities to Ang II at the AT(2) receptor. In contrast, the same cyclization procedures applied on the AT(2) selective 4-aminoPhe(6)-Ang II delivered significantly less potent AT(2) receptor ligands, although the AT(2)/AT(1) selectivity was still very high. The fact that different structure-activity relationships are observed after imposing conformational restrictions on Ang II and 4-aminoPhe(6)-Ang II, respectively, suggests that the peptides, despite large similarities might adopt quite different backbone conformations when binding to the AT(2) receptor.

Comparison of the solution structures of angiotensin I & II. Implication for structure-function relationship

Conformational analysis of angiotensin I (AI) and II (AII) peptides has been performed through 2D 1H-NMR spectroscopy in dimethylsulfoxide and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/H2O. The solution structural models of AI and AII have been determined in dimethylsulfoxide using NOE distance and 3JHNHalpha coupling constants. Finally, the AI family of models resulting from restrained energy minimization (REM) refinement, exhibits pairwise rmsd values for the family ensemble 0.26 +/- 0.13 A, 1.05 +/- 0.23 A, for backbone and heavy atoms, respectively, and the distance penalty function is calculated at 0.075 +/- 0.006 A2. Comparable results have been afforded for AII ensemble (rmsd values 0.30 +/- 0.22 A, 1.38 +/- 0.48 A for backbone and heavy atoms, respectively; distance penalty function is 0.029 +/- 0.003 A2). The two peptides demonstrate similar N-terminal and different C-terminal conformation as a consequence of the presence/absence of the His9-Leu10 dipeptide, which plays an important role in the different biological function of the two peptides. Other conformational variations focused on the side-chain orientation of aromatic residues, which constitute a biologically relevant hydrophobic core and whose inter-residue contacts are strong in dimethylsulfoxide and are retained even in mixed organic-aqueous media. Detailed analysis of the peptide structural features attempts to elucidate the conformational role of the C-terminal dipeptide to the different binding affinity of AI and AII towards the AT1 receptor and sets the basis for understanding the factors that might govern free- or bound-depended AII structural differentiation.

Angiotensin II is bound to both receptors AT1 and AT2, parallel to the transmembrane domains and in an extended form

We have applied photoaffinity labelling methods combined with site-directed mutagenesis towards the two principal angiotensin II (AnglI) receptors AT1 and AT2 in order to determine contact points between AngII and the two receptors. We have first identified the receptor contact points between an N- and a C-terminal residue of the AngII molecule and the AT1 receptor and constructed with this stereochemical restriction a molecular model of AT1. A similar approach with a modified procedure of photoaffinity labelling has allowed us now to determine contact points also in the AT2 receptor. Molecular modelling of AT2 on the rhodopsin scaffold and energy minimisation of AngII binding into this AT2 model produced a model strikingly similar to the AT11 structure. Superposition of the experimentally obtained contact points of AngII with AT2 upon this model revealed excellent congruence between the experimental and modelling results.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) athough AT1 and AT2 have quite low sequence homology, they both bind AngII with similar affinity and in an almost identical fashion, as if the ligand dictates the way it has to be bound, and (ii) in its bound form, AngII adopts an extended conformation in both AT1 and AT2, contrary to all previous predictions.

3D model for TM region of the AT-1 receptor in complex with angiotensin II independently validated by site-directed mutagenesis data

A three-dimensional model of the complex of angiotensin II (AII) with the transmembrane (TM) region of the angiotensin II receptor of type 1 (the AT-1 receptor) was obtained by molecular modeling procedures employing structural homology to the X-ray structure of rhodopsin. Since the modeling procedure considered only steric and energy considerations without prior knowledge of the experimental results of site-directed mutagenesis, the results with receptor mutants could be used for independent validation of the model. Indeed, the model brings in contact the residues of AII responsible for agonistic activity, Tyr(4), His(6), and Phe(8), with many residues of AT-1 involved in signal transduction according to site-directed mutagenesis. The model also predicts the existence of several possible conformational pathways for transferring the binding signal through the TM region of AT-1 to the intracellular loops interacting with the G-protein.

Comparison of three gamma-turn mimetic scaffolds incorporated into angiotensin II

Rigidification of peptides by cyclization and iterative incorporation of well-defined secondary structure mimetics constitutes one approach to the design of non-peptidergic structures with better defined conformations. We herein present the synthesis of a potential gamma-turn mimetic scaffold, and its incorporation in the 3-5 position of angiotensin II. Two analogues of angiotensin II (Ang II) incorporating this 1,3,5-trisubstituted benzene gamma-turn scaffold were synthesized. Evaluation of the compounds in a radioligand binding assay showed that they lacked affinity to the AT1 receptor. To rationalize these results a geometrical and electrostatical comparison with Ang II analogues encompassing a bicyclic scaffold that delivered inactive pseudo peptides and an azepine scaffold producing highly active ligands was made. This analysis did not provide a clear rationale for the inactivity of the benzene gamma-turn scaffolds.

UV resonance Raman study of angiotensin II conformation in nonaqueous environments: lipid micelles and acetonitrile

We used 206.5-nm excited resonance Raman measurements to examine the angiotensin II (AII) secondary structure in H(2)O in the presence of dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) monomers and micelles, and in a 70% acetonitrile (ACN-d)-30% water solution. Our AII-SDS titration absorption studies indicate the formation of a 1:2 AII:SDS complex in which two negatively charged SDS molecules attach to the AII positively charged N terminus and to Arg(2). Our 206.5-nm excited Raman results indicate that the 1:2 AII:SDS complexation increases the AII beta-turn composition. We also used 228.9-nm Raman excitation to probe the local solvent accessibility of Tyr(4) (AII) in DPC and SDS micelles. Our Tyr (AII) solvent accessibility studies suggest that the Tyr residue is more exposed to the aqueous environment in SDS micelles than in DPC micelles.

A review of mutagenesis studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor, the three-dimensional receptor model in search of the agonist and antagonist binding site and the hypothesis of a receptor activation mechanism

OBJECTIVE

To seek the mechanism whereby agonists, competitive antagonists and insurmountable antagonists affect the receptor function differently, by reviewing recent mutagenesis studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) in which the binding of the agonist and antagonists and receptor signaling were affected.

AT1 RECEPTOR STRUCTURE AND LIGAND BINDING SITES

We built a model of seven transmembrane spanning domains of the AT1 receptors using bacteriorhodopsin as a template. The carboxy terminal of angiotensin II binds to Lys199 in transmembrane domain 5, whereas the guanidinium group of Arg2 binds to Asp281 in transmembrane domain 7. Results of studies using mutagenesis supporting proposed ligand-docking models are discussed. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE LIGAND-INDUCED RECEPTOR SIGNALING MECHANISM: We submit a set of hypotheses for a mechanism whereby the ligand binding induces changes in the receptor conformation by the rotation of transmembrane helices as the initial event for the subsequent activation of a G protein. In this mechanism antagonists are not capable of rotating the helices but agonists are able to do so, which results in the formation of a hydrogen bond between Asp74 in transmembrane domain 2 and Tyr292 in transmembrane domain 7. This mechanism also provides plausible explanation for the activation of monoamine receptors.

COMPETITIVE AND INSURMOUNTABLE ANTAGONISTS

Competitive antagonists share the same binding sites with agonists, but insurmountable antagonists do not, and binding of the latter does not preclude agonist binding, for example, to Asp281.

CONCLUSION

This hypothesis of the intrareceptor signaling mechanism and the receptor model indicate that some amino acid residues essential for the signaling play their roles in the intrareceptor activation mechanism, whereas others participate directly in ligand binding.