Capsule endoscopy as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of graft-vs.-host disease

[When and how should small-bowel capsule endoscopy be used in children?]

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) has recently been used in children. During the past few years, an intense research activity has defined the advantages and limitations of CE. Its uses have been established in several small-bowel pathologies such as obvious or obscure digestive bleeding, Crohn disease, and hereditary polyposis. Although the absence of biopsy reduces the specificity of CE findings, small-bowel exploration using CE achieves better accuracy in detecting lesions than most radiological examinations. In children, swallowing problems and the risk of retention due to stenosis are the main concerns when using CE: these problems can be solved using endoscopic delivery of the capsule and luminal diameter calibration, respectively. This review focuses on the evidence making CE indispensable to small-bowel exploration.

NASPGHAN Capsule Endoscopy Clinical Report

Wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) was introduced in 2000 as a less invasive method to visualize the distal small bowel in adults. Because this technology has advanced it has been adapted for use in pediatric gastroenterology. Several studies have described its clinical use, utility, and various training methods but pediatric literature regarding CE is limited. This clinical report developed by the Endoscopic and Procedures Committee of the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition outlines the current literature, and describes the recommended current role, use, training, and future areas of research for CE in pediatrics.

Guideline for wireless capsule endoscopy in children and adolescents: A consensus document by the SEGHNP (Spanish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition) and the SEPD (Spanish Society for Digestive Diseases)

INTRODUCTION

Capsule Endoscopy (CE) in children has limitations based mainly on age. The objective of this consensus was reviewing the scientific evidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Some experts from the Spanish Society of Gastroenterology (SEPD) and Spanish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (SEGHNP) were invited to answer different issues about CE in children. These sections were: a) Indications, contraindications and limitations; b) efficacy of CE in different clinical scenarios; c) CE performance; d) CE-related complications; e) Patency Capsule; and f) colon capsule endoscopy. They reviewed relevant questions on each topic.

RESULTS

The main indication is Crohn's disease (CD). There is no contraindication for the age and in the event that the patient not to swallow it, it should be administered under deep sedation with endoscopy and specific device. The CE is useful in CD, for the management of OGIB in children and in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (in this indication has the most effectiveness). The main complication is retention, which should be specially taken into account in cases of CD already diagnosed with malnutrition. A preparation regimen based on a low volume of polyethylene glycol (PEG) the day before plus simethicone on the same day is the best one in terms of cleanliness although does not improve the results of the CE procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

CE is safe and useful in children. Indications are similar to those of adults, the main one is CD to establish both a diagnosis and disease extension. Moreover, only few limitations are detected in children.

New insight for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative therapy for different life-threatening malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality following allo-SCT, which limits the use of this treatment in a broader spectrum of patients. Early diagnostic of GVHD is essential to initiate treatment as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of GVHD may be difficult to establish, because of the nonspecific nature of the associated symptoms and of the numerous differential diagnosis. This is particularly true regarding gastrointestinal (GI) acute GVHD. In the recent years many progress has been made in medical imaging test and endoscopic techniques. The interest of these different techniques in the diagnosis of GI acute GVHD has been evaluated in several studies. With this background we review the contributions, limitations, and future prospect of these techniques in the diagnosis of GI acute GVHD.

Fulminant gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease concomitant with cytomegalovirus infection: Case report and literature review

Here, we report a case of fulminant gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in 44-year-old woman. Despite the difficulties associated with the treatment of GI-GVHD and GI-CMV disease, the mucosal findings and the clinical course showed marked improvements during long-term clinical observation. The endoscopic findings were remarkable, with diffuse sloughing mucosa in the stomach and highly active inflammation and deep discrete ulcers throughout the colon. Changes in the CMV quantitative polymerase chain reaction results were correlated with the endoscopic mucosal findings and were useful for assessing the efficacy of the treatment. Although a definite diagnosis of GI-GVHD is generally made by endoscopy with biopsy, the gross appearance of this disease can vary depending on the endoscopy. In this paper, we also conduct a literature review of patients with GI-GVHD.

Enteroscopy in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic investigation of small bowel disorders in children has historically been difficult due to the length and tortuosity of the organ itself. New technology introduced over the past decade allows minimally invasive, detailed endoscopic evaluation of the small bowel mucosa from the duodenum to the cecum. While understudied in the pediatric population, literature is emerging supporting the use of these techniques and devices in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Well tolerated and clinically useful capsule endoscopy has been reported a number of times in children, and the indications and potential complications of this procedure are discussed. The limitations of capsule endoscopy, namely inability to biopsy and treat small bowel lesions, have been addressed to some extent by the introduction of balloon enteroscopy, which allows deep intubation of the small bowel, and at times viewing of the entire mucosal surface. Balloon enteroscopy has been safely reported in children as small as 13.1  kg, and has been successfully performed in children with Roux-en-Y anastomoses in the evaluation and therapy of biliary strictures.

SUMMARY

New enteroscopic techniques now allow detailed investigation and therapy of small bowel lesions in a minimally invasive fashion in the pediatric population.

General considerations and updates in pediatric gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy

Gastrointestinal and colonic endoscopic examinations have been performed in pediatric patients in Korea for 3 decades. Endoscopic procedures are complex and may be unsafe if special concerns are not considered. Many things have to be kept in mind before, during, and after the procedure. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is one of the most frequently performed procedure in children nowadays, Since the dimension size of the endoscopy was modified for pediatric patients 15 years ago, endoscopic procedures are almost performed routinely in pediatric gastrointestinal patients. The smaller size of the scope let the physicians approach the diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures. But this is an invasive procedure, so the procedure itself may provoke an emergence state. The procedure-related complications can more easily occur in pediatric patients. Sedation-related or procedure-related respiratory, cardiovascular complications are mostly important and critical in the care. The endoscopists are required to consider diverse aspects of the procedure - patient preparation, indications and contraindications, infection controls, sedation methods, sedative medicines and the side effects of each medicine, monitoring during and after the procedure, and complications related with the procedure and medicines - to perform the procedure successfully and safely. This article presents some important guidelines and recommendations for gastrointestinal endoscopy through literature review.

Wireless capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients: the first series from Japan

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to determine the safety and usefulness of capsule endoscopy (CE) in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We prospectively examined children (aged 10-18 years) with suspected small bowel disease and recorded capsule transit times, findings, and complications.

RESULTS

We performed 19 CE examinations in 12 patients (median age 11.8 years; range 10-18 years). One of the two patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), a 14-year-old girl whose OGIB occurred after cord-blood transplantation due to leukemia, was diagnosed with thrombotic microangiopathy. Repeated CE allowed visualization of real-time mucosal changes, such as the improvement of ulcers and bleeding, and newly emerged lymphangiectasia, without causing the patient physical and mental stress. This information facilitated both subsequent evaluation of the clinical course and determination of the appropriate treatment strategy. In the second patient with chronic OGIB, a 10-year-old girl, the detection of severe ileal stenoses by capsule retention led to the diagnosis of non-specific multiple ulcers of the small intestine. After ileal resection, repeated CE detected the recurrence of multiple ulcers and enabled the optimal treatment strategy to be applied. CE confirmed small bowel involvement in a patient with unresponsive Crohn's disease (CD) and excluded CD in all five patients with suspected CD. Similarly, CE confirmed the absence of small bowel involvement in three of the four patients with recurrent abdominal pain, although one patient had nodular lymphoid hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, CE is a valuable tool in the differential diagnoses of small bowel diseases, and repeated examination can provide real-time information that will enable evaluation of the clinical course in pediatric patients.

Nonabsorbable corticosteroids use in the treatment of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

For over a decade, nonabsorbable corticosteroids have been employed in the treatment of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), as monotherapy or in combination with systemic corticosteroids. The majority of the evidence showing a favorable outcome consisted of case series, small phase II trials and a large randomized phase III trial. The 2 most commonly studied molecules were oral budesonide and beclomethasone diproprionate. Although these reports hint at some benefit with the local treatment strategy, their methodologic inconsistencies preclude meaningful adoption to everyday clinical practice. This review evaluates the current evidence of nonabsorbable corticosteroids in HSCT and sets forth recommendations for future trials with these agents.

Capsule endoscopy: past, present, and future

A capsule endoscope is a swallowable wireless miniature camera for getting images of the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. The initial capsule endoscope model was developed by Given Imaging and approved in Western countries in 2001. Before the introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon endoscopy (DBE), there was no effective modality for the evaluation and management of patients with obscure GI bleeding. Obscure GI bleeding is defined as bleeding of unknown origin that persists or recurs after a negative initial or primary endoscopy (colonoscopy or upper endoscopy) result. The first capsule endoscope model, which is now regarded as a first-line tool for the detection of abnormalities of the small bowel, was the PillCam SB. It was approved in Japan in April 2007. The main indication for use of the PillCam SB is obscure GI bleeding. Almost the only complication of CE is capsule retention, which is the capsule remaining in the digestive tract for a minimum of 2 weeks. A retained capsule can be retrieved by DBE. There are some limitations of CE in that it cannot be used to obtain a biopsy specimen or for endoscopic treatment. However, the combination of a PillCam SB and DBE seems to be the best strategy for management of obscure GI bleeding. Recently, several new types of capsule endoscope have been developed, such as Olympus CE for the small bowel, PillCam ESO for investigation of esophageal diseases, and PillCam COLON for detection of colonic neoplasias. In the near future, CE is expected to have a positive impact on many aspects of GI disease evaluation and management.

Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: indications, risks and limitations

Capsule endoscopy has revoluzionized the study of the small bowel by providing a reliable method to evaluate, endoscopically, the entire small bowel. In the last six years several papers have been published exploring the possible role of this examination in different clinical conditions. At the present time capsule endoscopy is generally recommended as a third examination, after negative bidirectional endoscopy, in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. A growing body of evidence suggests also an important role for this examination in other clinical conditions such as Crohn's disease, celiac disease, small bowel polyposis syndromes or small bowel tumors. The main complication of this examination is the retention of the device at the site of a previously unknown small bowel stricture. However there are also some other open issues mainly due to technical limitations of this tool (which is not driven from remote control, is unable to take biopsies, to insufflate air, to suck fluids or debris and sometimes to correctly size and locate lesions). The recently developed double balloon enteroscope, owing to its capability to explore a large part of the small bowel and to take targeted biopsies, although being invasive and time consuming, can overcome some limitations of capsule endoscopy. At the present time, in the majority of clinical conditions (i.e. obscure GI bleeding), the winning strategy seems to be to couple these two techniques to explore the small bowel in a painless, safe and complete way (with capsule endoscopy) and to define and treat the lesions identified (with double balloon enteroscopy).

Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: indications, risks and limitations

Capsule endoscopy has revoluzionized the study of the small bowel by providing a reliable method to evaluate, endoscopically, the entire small bowel. In the last six years several papers have been published exploring the possible role of this examination in different clinical conditions. At the present time capsule endoscopy is generally recommended as a third examination, after negative bidirectional endoscopy, in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. A growing body of evidence suggests also an important role for this examination in other clinical conditions such as Crohn's disease, celiac disease, small bowel polyposis syndromes or small bowel tumors. The main complication of this examination is the retention of the device at the site of a previously unknown small bowel stricture. However there are also some other open issues mainly due to technical limitations of this tool (which is not driven from remote control, is unable to take biopsies, to insufflate air, to suck fluids or debris and sometimes to correctly size and locate lesions). The recently developed double balloon enteroscope, owing to its capability to explore a large part of the small bowel and to take targeted biopsies, although being invasive and time consuming, can overcome some limitations of capsule endoscopy. At the present time, in the majority of clinical conditions (i.e. obscure GI bleeding), the winning strategy seems to be to couple these two techniques to explore the small bowel in a painless, safe and complete way (with capsule endoscopy) and to define and treat the lesions identified (with double balloon enteroscopy).

Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of gastrointestinal disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The small bowel has been a technically difficult area to examine. Indirect modalities such as barium follow-through have the disadvantage of attendant radiation exposure. Capsule endoscopy, a novel wireless method of investigation of the small bowel, has acquired an important role in both adult and paediatric medicine.

RECENT FINDINGS

The clinical utility of capsule endoscopy has rapidly expanded since its approval by the Food & Drug Administration in the USA in 2001. It has developed an established role in adults, in the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, small bowel Crohn's disease, complications of coeliac disease and surveillance of polyposis syndromes. Despite a lag in its use in paediatrics, capsule endoscopy offers an accurate and effective means of investigating the small bowel in children. It has opened up new horizons and permitted a noninvasive approach to identifying occult lesions in the small bowel of children when conventional imaging has been unhelpful.

SUMMARY

This review appraises the current literature to define the clinical indications and practical aspects of capsule endoscopy that are of interest to the paediatrician.

Wireless capsule endoscopy in the pediatric age group: experience and complications

BACKGROUND

The development of wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) provides a unique opportunity to visualize the entire small bowel in a minimally invasive manner. Studies in adult patients have demonstrated that the disposable capsule is well tolerated and highly effective, but few studies have been done in children. The aims of our study were to compare the diagnostic yield of CE and small bowel series in children being evaluated for possible small intestine disease and to determine the risk of developing an adverse event following capsule endoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all children who underwent CE at 1 institution between August 2002 and July 2005. Results of CE were compared with those of small bowel radiographic studies when available.

RESULTS

There were 46 CE studies from 45 patients, 28 male and 17 female, with a mean age of 14.9 +/- 3.6 years and mean weight of 49.7 +/- 17.5 kg. The indications for CE included unresponsive Crohn disease (n = 16), possible intestinal polyps (n = 11), unexplained iron deficiency anemia (n = 7), growth failure (n = 5), unresponsive ulcerative colitis (n = 3), persistent abdominal pain (n = 1), protein-losing enteropathy (n = 1), and allergic enteropathy with occult gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1). Of the 46 CE studies, 41 were completed and 5 were incomplete studies. Based on the CE, 9 patients were newly diagnosed with Crohn disease, 9 patients with Crohn disease were newly diagnosed with small bowel involvement, 8 patients had upper intestinal polyps, 1 patient had findings consistent with Ménétrièr disease, and 1 had a duodenal ulcer. Thirty-three patients had small bowel series before CE: 24 studies were normal, 6 had abnormal thickening of the small bowel, 2 had polyps, and 1 patient had antral narrowing. All 9 patients with abnormal small bowel series had abnormal CE studies. Of the 24 patients with normal small bowel series, 20 had completed CE studies, and in 10 children, the study was abnormal. Nine of the 45 subjects had adverse events. Five patients had delayed passage from the stomach, with 2 needing endoscopic retrieval of the CE, and 4 had delayed passage from the small intestine (>5 days), with 2 requiring surgical removal, 1 responding to steroids, and the final patient requiring an ileocolic resection 2 months after the CE for an undiagnosed ileal stricture. The only significant association noted was that older patients were more likely to have intestinal retention.

CONCLUSIONS

CE provides a valuable tool in the evaluation of pediatric patients for possible small bowel disease. However, the risk of developing complications appears to be greater in the pediatric population, with 20% of our patients having an adverse event.