Valganciclovir prophylaxis in patients at high risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease

Bilateral Cytomegalovirus Retinitis After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for B-cell Lymphoma

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is commonly associated with immunosuppression and can cause irreversible vision loss. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as an effective cancer treatment option but requires immunosuppression, thereby increasing the possibility of acquiring opportunistic infections such as CMV. We present the case of a 76-year-old female with a history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus who initially presented with shortness of breath and was diagnosed with the activated B-cell subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). She received multiple cycles of chemotherapy and experienced relapses with cardiac involvement. The patient developed vision loss in the right eye and was diagnosed with bilateral posterior vitritis. She underwent various treatments, including radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, cataract extraction, and vitrectomy. After CAR-T therapy, she developed bilateral CMV retinitis, confirmed through polymerase chain reaction testing and managed by valganciclovir. Overall, this case report describes the first reported case of bilateral CMV retinitis following CAR-T therapy for DLBCL. It emphasizes the need for early recognition and treatment of CMV retinitis to prevent permanent vision loss. The report also underscores the importance of regular ocular screening and consideration of prophylactic measures in patients undergoing CAR-T therapy.

Universal prophylaxis with gancyclovir preparation is not necessary in our kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common cause of morbidity, graft loss, and mortality among kidney recipients due to its direct and indirect influences on organs and systems. In this study, we evaluated CMV infection in transplant recipients in Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 104 renal allograft recipients and their donors transplanted between January 2005 and January 2010. We included all patients (recipients and donors) with least one valid laboratory result for CMV immunoglobulin (Ig)G and CMV IgM. We evaluated the occurrence of CMV disease in allograft recipients in at least the first 3 years after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven renal allograft recipients (54.8%) were males and 47 (45.2%) were females. The overall mean (±standard error) age was 40.32±13.30 years. CMV IgG was positive in 95 cases (91.3%), negative in 9 (8.7%). Serologically, 76.9% patients were D+/R+ 14.4% D-/R+, and 8.7% D+R-. Due to the proccurrence of rejection rendering them high-risk patients for CMV infection about 15% of subjects were treated with anti thymocyte globulin (ATG) followed by prophylactic intravenous gancyclovir for 2 weeks, at doses based on allograft function. Confirmed CMV infection and CMV disease occurred in less than 5% of recipients in the first year after transplantation. About 6% of renal allograft recipients died due to infections during the first 3 years posttransplantation but CMV disease was not confirmed in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Due to the living donor-based renal transplantation program, the selection of low-risk patients (panel-reactive antibodies 30%), the low percent of D+/R- patients (8.7%) and the low use of ATG for induction therapy in the Iranian model, universal prophylaxis with gancyclovir is not routinely recommended for our cases.

Post-transplant infections: An ounce of prevention

Infections are the leading cause of hospitalization in transplant recipients. The increased risk of new onset diabetes after transplantation, cardiovascular disease, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders adversely affects allograft outcomes. Risk is determined by epidemiologic exposure, immunosuppressive therapy and prophylaxis. The predictable sequence of appearance of infections helps in making management decisions. High likelihood of infections with unusual and multiple organisms necessitates aggressive use of imaging techniques and invasive procedures. Serologic tests depend upon antibody response and are unreliable. Nucleic acid based assays are sensitive, rapid, and allow detection of subclinical infection and assessment of response to therapy. Preventive steps include screening of donors and recipients and vaccination. All indicated vaccines should be administered before transplantation. Inactivated vaccines can be administered after transplantation but produce weak and transient antibody response. Boosters may be required once antibody titers wane. Post-transplant chemoprophylaxis includes cotrimoxazole for preventing urinary tract infections, pneumocystis and Nocardia infections; ganciclovir, valganciclovir, or acyclovir for cytomegalovirus related complications in at-risk recipients; and lamivudine for prevention of progressive liver disease in HBsAg positive recipients. Viral load monitoring and pre-emptive treatment is used for BK virus infection. Infection with new organisms has recently been reported, mostly due to inadvertent transmission via the donor organ.

Simultaneous monitoring of CMV and human herpesvirus 6 infections and diseases in liver transplant patients: one-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to simultaneously monitoring cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 active infections using nested-polymerase chain reaction and, together with clinical findings, follow the clinical status of patients undergoing liver transplant.

INTRODUCTION

The human β-herpesviruses, including cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6, are ubiquitous among human populations. Active infections of human herpesvirus 6 and cytomegalovirus are common after liver transplantation, possibly induced and facilitated by allograft rejection and immunosuppressive therapy. Both viruses affect the success of the transplant procedure.

METHODS

Thirty patients submitted to liver transplant at the Liver Transplant Unit, at the Gastro Center, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil, were studied prospectively from six months to one year, nested-polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 DNA detections. Two or more consecutive positive nested-polymerase chain reaction were considered indicative of active infection.

RESULTS

Active infection by cytomegalovirus was detected in 13/30 (43.3%) patients, median time to first cytomegalovirus detection was 29 days after transplantation (range: 0-99 days). Active infection by human herpesvirus 6 was detected in 12/30 (40%) patients, median time to first human herpesvirus 6 detection was 23.5 days after transplantation (range: 0-273 days). The time-related appearance of each virus was not statistically different (p = 0.49). Rejection of the transplanted liver was observed in 16.7% (5/30) of the patients. The present analysis showed that human herpesvirus 6 and/or cytomegalovirus active infections were frequent in liver transplant recipients at our center.

CONCLUSIONS

Few patients remain free of betaherpesviruses after liver transplantation. Most patients presenting active infection with more than one virus were infected sequentially and not concurrently. Nested-polymerase chain reaction can be considered of limited value for clinically monitoring cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6.

Diversity of antiviral-resistant human cytomegalovirus in heart and lung transplant recipients

Immunocompromised transplant recipients are at high risk for human cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related infection and disease. Antiviral prophylaxis and treatment have reduced CMV morbidity and mortality, but at times promote development of antiviral-resistant CMV strains that can significantly contribute to adverse clinical outcomes in transplant recipients. We have investigated CMV genotypes in transplant recipients (bone marrow, stem cell, kidney, heart, lung, and liver) receiving antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy or treatment, to determine the viral characteristics and clinical impact of antiviral-resistant CMV in these different groups. Antiviral-resistant CMV strains were detected by polymerase chain reaction sequencing of the CMV protein kinase (UL97) and viral DNA polymerase (UL54) genes from clinical specimens. A trend toward more frequent detection of multidrug resistance and co-circulation of multiple resistant strains was seen in heart and lung transplant recipients compared with other transplantation types. A greater diversity and number of UL97 and UL54 mutations were observed in heart and lung transplant recipients; whereas antiviral-resistant CMV infections in other transplant recipients were predominantly the result of a single mutant genotype. Furthermore, 43% (6/14) of CMV-positive heart and lung transplant recipients were infected with CMV strains containing UL54 mutations conferring multidrug resistance compared with only 6% (1/18) of CMV-positive recipients of other transplanted organs or stem cells. Emergence of CMV strains containing previously unrecognized UL54 mutations (F412S and D485N) also occurred in 1 lung and 1 heart transplant recipient. The development of these mutations under antiviral selective pressure, and clinical outcome of infection suggests these mutations are likely to confer antiviral resistance. Emergence of CMV antiviral resistance remains a significant issue in immunocompromised patients treated with antiviral agents, and emphasizes the relevance of regular antiviral resistance testing when designing optimal patient-management strategies.

An unusual case of CMV cutaneous ulcers in a renal transplant recipient and review of literature

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection involving the skin is rare. We present a case of a renal transplant recipient who developed fever and axillary, scrotal and penile skin ulcers after renal transplantation. The skin ulcers did not heal with antibiotics. The skin biopsy revealed CMV inclusion bodies, CMV antigen on immunohistochemistry and high CMV DNA copies. The patient was diagnosed with CMV cutaneous ulcers. The skin ulcers healed after treatment with intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir. The diagnosis of CMV disease should be considered in the febrile immunosuppressed patient with skin ulcers. The biopsy of the cutaneous lesions may provide the diagnostic clue in such patients.

Incidence, risk factors and clinical consequences of neutropenia following kidney transplantation: a retrospective study

Neutropenic episodes in kidney transplant patients are poorly characterized. In this retrospective study, neutropenia was experienced by 112/395 patients (28%) during the first year posttransplant. The only factor found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of neutropenia was combined tacrolimus-mycophenolate therapy (p < 0.001). Neutropenic patients experienced more bacterial infections (43% vs. 32%, p = 0.04). Grade of neutropenia correlated with the global risk of infection. Discontinuation of mycophenolic acid (MPA) due to neutropenia was associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection (odds ratios per day 1.11, 95% confidence intervals 1.02-1.22) but not with reduced renal function at 1 year. The time from onset of neutropenia to MPA discontinuation correlated with the duration of neutropenia. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was safe and effective in severely neutropenic kidney graft recipients, with absolute neutrophil count >1000/microL achieved in a mean of 1.5+/-0.5 days. Neutropenia is an important and frequent laboratory finding that may exert a significant influence on outcomes in kidney transplantation. As well as leading to an increased incidence of infection, it is associated with a higher rate of allograft rejection if MPA is discontinued for >6 days (p = 0.02). G-CSF accelerates recovery of neutropenia and may be a good therapeutic alternative for severely neutropenic patients.

Avoiding pitfalls: what an endoscopist should know in liver transplantation--part II

Over the last decade the number of patients undergoing transplantation has increased. At the same time, effective peri- and postoperative care and better surgical techniques have resulted in greater numbers of recipients achieving long-term survival. Identification and effective management in the form of adequate treatment is essential, since any delay in diagnosis or treatment may result in graft loss or serious threat to patient's life. Various aspects of endoscopic findings that can be commonly encountered among liver transplant recipients are discussed herein. Topics include: persistent and/or recurrent esophageal varices, reflux, Candida or cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis, esophageal neoplasms, posttransplant peptic ulcer, biliary complications, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), Kaposi's sarcoma, CMV colitis and inflammatory bowel disease, colonic neoplasms, Clostridium difficile infection, and graft versus host disease (GVHD).

Probabilistic modeling of cytomegalovirus infection under consensus clinical management guidelines

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen after renal transplantation and remains a major therapeutic challenge with important clinical and economic implications from both direct and indirect consequences of infection.

METHODS

This 5-year study modeled the relationship between CMV infection and biopsy-proven graft rejection, graft loss, or death after renal transplantation in an inception cohort using Canadian consensus guidelines for CMV management as a component of a detailed cost-analysis of viral infection.

RESULTS

Probabilities of CMV viremia and syndrome/disease among 270 sequential graft recipients were 0.27 and 0.09, respectively; 91% of cases occurred in the first 6 months. Probability of CMV infection as the first event was 0.29, with a probability of subsequent biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) of 0.05 (mean: 62+/-26 days, range: 32-85 days), whereas the probability of BPAR as the first event was 0.18, with a probability of subsequent CMV infection of 0.38 (mean: 63+/-31, range: 27-119 days). Probability of freedom from both CMV infection and BPAR throughout the period of observation was 0.53. Time-dependent Cox analysis showed that neither donor/recipient CMV risk stratum nor CMV infection influenced the risks of BPAR (P=0.24; P=0.74) or of graft loss or death (P=0.26; P=0.34). In contrast, BPAR significantly increased the risk of both subsequent CMV infection (hazard ratio=1.77, P=0.03) and of graft loss or death (hazard ratio=8.31, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although current antiviral therapy seems to mitigate the reported deleterious effects of CMV infection on BPAR or graft survival, BPAR remains a significantly risk factor for both CMV infection and functional graft survival.

Medical management update: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Lymphoma is a heterogeneous malignancy of the lymphatic system characterized by proliferation of lymphoid cells or their precursors. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with significant morbidity and is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States. Manifestations of NHL as well as complications of the disease and its management are frequently encountered in the head and neck region and often require specific treatment and modifications in the provision of oral health care. The purpose of this article is to review current concepts of the pathophysiology, as well as medical and oral health care management of NHL.

Prevention of posttransplant cytomegalovirus disease and related outcomes with valganciclovir: a systematic review

The precise impact of valganciclovir as preventive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is not fully defined. Data from studies using valganciclovir as preemptive therapy or prophylaxis for CMV in SOT recipients were synthesized for descriptive analysis. CMV disease occurred in 2.6% and 9.9% of the patients receiving valganciclovir as preemptive therapy and prophylaxis, respectively. Although the incidence of early-onset (<or=90 days posttransplant) CMV disease was only 0.8% and 1.2% in all patients and R-/D+ patients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis, the incidence of late-onset (>90 days posttransplant) CMV disease rose up to 8.9% and 17.7% in the prophylactic group, respectively. On the contrary, no patients developed late-onset CMV disease in preemptive group. Both approaches with valganciclovir have successfully decreased CMV disease in SOT recipients. Late-onset CMV disease is a complication observed uniquely with valganciclovir prophylaxis, particularly in R-/D+ patients, but not with preemptive therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of low and maintenance dose valganciclovir in kidney transplant recipients

Valganciclovir is commonly used for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant patients. A fixed dose of 900 mg daily is typically recommended, however, there has never been a formal pharmacokinetic study comparing various doses in renal transplant patients. We therefore compared the pharmacokinetic characteristics of intravenous ganciclovir (IV GCV) and oral ganciclovir (GCV) with two different doses of valganciclovir (VGCV) in an open-label crossover study. Ten adult kidney recipients participated in a four-phase crossover treatment schedule of IV GCV (2.5 mg/kg every 12 h), VGCV (900 mg daily), VGCV (450 mg daily) and oral GCV (1000 mg Q8 H). IV GCV and oral VGCV 900 mg daily achieved similar values for AUC(0-24) (median 60.63 vs. 62.86 microg/h/mL). Oral VGCV 450 mg achieved comparable AUC(0-24) values as oral GCV 1000 mg Q8 H (median AUC(0-24) 35.9 vs. 29.04 microg/h/mL). Oral VGCV 900 mg daily provided systemic GCV exposure similar to IV GCV and confirms PV 16 000 study results. Further, VGCV 450 mg daily provided comparable systemic exposure versus oral GCV. Due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, data herein suggest that VGCV can be used in the early post-kidney transplant period, and that 450 mg daily provides ample drug exposure for effective CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients.

Management of oral infections in cancer patients

The myelosuppressive and mucosal-damaging consequences of cancer and cancer therapies place patients at high risk for developing infectious complications. Bacterial, fungal, and viral infections are all commonly encountered in the oral cavity, contributing to both morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Prevention, early and definitive diagnosis, and appropriate management are critical to ensure optimal treatment outcomes. With the majority of cancer patients treated as outpatients in the community setting, oral health care professionals play an important role in managing such infectious complications of cancer therapy.

Acute esophageal necrosis (black esophagus) in the renal transplant recipient: manifestation of primary cytomegalovirus infection

We report a severe case of cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis in a renal transplant recipient presenting as acute esophageal necrosis (AEN, 'black esophagus'). AEN is an uncommon entity that is a result of mucosal necrosis and has been described only a few times previously. To our knowledge, this is the first report of AEN due to a CMV infection. The disease was manifested by abdominal and epigastric pain, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevated liver enzymes. Upper endoscopy showed acute esophageal necrosis. Ganciclovir therapy was initiated immediately and resulted in a complete remission of symptoms. We conclude that the possibility of CMV infection should be suspected in any patient presenting with cytopenia, elevated liver enzymes, and epithelial gastrointestinal lesions in the first 6 months after transplantation, and that early viral detection and antiviral therapy can be lifesaving.

The use of consensus guidelines for management of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection imposes a significant economic burden on susceptible patients after renal transplantation. Our study was conducted to determine the prediction, probability, consequences, and treatment costs of CMV infection under Canadian consensus guidelines in 270 sequential transplant patients. Transplant patients from donors positive (D(+)) for CMV into recipients negative (R(-)) for CMV received antiviral prophylaxis for 14 weeks and all but donor negative (D(-))/R(-) patients were monitored weekly for the CMVpp65 marker expression. Marker-positive patients and patients with CMV infection or disease received antiviral treatment. Within the first 6 months, 27% of the 270 patients tested had incidences of asymptomatic CMV infection, while 9% had CMV syndrome or disease. Only 1% of patients had infection after 6 months. The CMVpp65 marker levels were significantly greater in patients with syndrome or disease; but post-test probabilities and predictive value of the marker assay were low. Mean direct costs for care were $2256 and ranged from $927 for D(-)/R(-) patients to $7069 in the D(+)/R(-) patients. Extension of antiviral prophylaxis to D(+) or D(+)/R(+) patients significantly increased the estimated mean costs for an absolute reduction to 4% in CMV syndrome or disease. Our studies show that current guidelines for treatment enable effective control of CMV infection; however, alternative strategies have different economic impact.

Late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in patients with solid organ transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review existing data regarding late cytomegalovirus disease occurring after antiviral prophylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a continued debate as to the respective merits of the preemptive and the prophylactic approach to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Arguably, by allowing some infection, the preemptive approach helps build immunity in contrast to prophylaxis, explaining the occurrence of late cytomegalovirus disease in the latter approach. No study comparing directly both approaches is large enough to definitely determine whether the preemptive approach leads to a faster development of immune response protective from late disease nor whether late disease is clinically different after prophylaxis compared to early cytomegalovirus diseases. While risk factors for late cytomegalovirus disease all point to a delay in mounting immune responses, there are no identified markers that would help predict the risk for late disease at the time of prophylaxis discontinuation. Various approaches to prevent late cytomegalovirus disease have been developed: prolonged prophylaxis, microbiological surveillance and preemptive treatment after prophylaxis discontinuation. Considering the identifying risk factors for late disease, it would also make sense to envision vaccinating cytomegalovirus-seronegative recipients.

SUMMARY

The best approach to prevent or manage late cytomegalovirus disease associated with cytomegalovirus prophylaxis remains to be defined.

Oral Valgancyclovir Versus Intravenous Gancyclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a regular practice in organ transplantation. Oral valgancyclovir appears to be an interesting alternative to the usual intravenous form.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively compared the response of intravenous gancyclovir for 2 weeks (GAN; n=41) to oral valgancyclovir for 2 weeks (VAL2w; n=23) or 3 months (VAL3m; n=46) in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction immunosuppression. CMV antigenemia assay and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used for viral detection. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months posttransplantation. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis using a cutoff of significance as P<.05.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the demographic features among the study groups. However, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match was better in the VAL3m group and the patients of this group received less ATG induction immunosuppression (41.3%) compared with the GAN group (100%). The incidence of acute rejection was not different among the study groups. There was a higher incidence of fever with positive CMV tests in the VAL2w group (P=.035) compared with the other groups, while leukopenia with a negative CMV test was significantly higher in the VAL3m group (P=.04). The incidence of CMV disease was higher in the VAL2w group (30.4%) compared with the GAN group (14.6%) or the VAL3m group (8.7%). Renal function was significantly worse in the VAL2w group at 3 and 6 months (P=.011 and .02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months oral valgancyclovir prophylaxis for CMV was a more effective regimen compared with intravenous gancyclovir for 2 weeks. Shorter courses were associated with a higher incidence of CMV infection and poorer graft function. Leukopenia observed in patients receiving valgancyclovir may be a drug-related side effect.

Cytomegalovirus in transplantation ? challenging the status quo

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients causes both ''direct'' and ''indirect'' effects including allograft rejection, decreased graft and patient survival, and predisposition to opportunistic infections and malignancies. Options for CMV prevention include pre-emptive therapy, whereby anti-CMV agents are administered based on sensitive viral assays, or universal prophylaxis of all at-risk patients. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficacy, costs, and side effects. Standards of care for prophylaxis have not been established.

METHODS

A committee of international experts was convened to review the available data regarding CMV prophylaxis and to compare preventative strategies for CMV after transplantation from seropositive donors or in seropositive recipients.

RESULTS

Pre-emptive therapy requires frequent monitoring with subsequent treatment of disease and associated costs, while universal prophylaxis results in greater exposure to potential toxicities and costs of drugs. The advantages of prophylaxis include suppressing asymptomatic viremia and prevention of both direct and indirect effects of CMV infection. Meta analyses reveal decreased in mortality for patients receiving CMV prophylaxis. Costs associated with prophylaxis are less than for routine monitoring and pre-emptive therapy. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains undefined. Extended prophylaxis may improve clinical outcomes in the highest-risk patient populations including donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative renal transplants and in CMV-infected lung and heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing direct and indirect effects of CMV infection in transplant recipients, affecting both allograft and patient survival. More studies are necessary to define optimal prophylaxis regimens.

Oral Ganciclovir Versus Low-Dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Recipients of Kidney and Pancreas Transplants

BACKGROUND

The optimal regimen for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation remains unclear. We compared the effectiveness of three months of oral ganciclovir (3 g/day) versus low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) for CMV prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at our center who received kidney and/or pancreas transplants between January 2000 and April 2003. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relationship between baseline covariates, including type of CMV prophylaxis, and time to development of CMV disease.

RESULTS

Of the 500 patients (295 ganciclovir, 205 valganciclovir), 22 patients (4.4%) developed CMV disease (mean time to CMV disease, 163+/-85 days). Sixteen of the ganciclovir patients (5.4%) and six of the valganciclovir patients (2.9%) developed CMV disease (P=0.18). By CMV serostatus, the incidence of CMV disease during the first posttransplant year was 8.5% among donor-seropositive, recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) patients, 8.6% among D+/R+ patients, 2.9% among D-/R+ patients, 1.0% among D-/R- patients, and 0.9% among patients for whom documentation of CMV serostatus was incomplete. In the unadjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, race/ethnicity, type of transplant, type of antiviral prophylaxis, CMV serostatus, and use of mycophenolate mofetil were each associated with risk of developing CMV disease. In the adjusted, multivariable model, only CMV serostatus was associated with development of CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) was as effective as ganciclovir (3 g/day) for prophylaxis of CMV disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation.

Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Leucopenia After Administration of Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Chinese Cardiac Recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir (VGC) has recently been proved efficacious for the prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients. Leucopenia is a troublesome complication of VGC but the possible risk factors are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Once a cardiac recipient's quantitative real-time CMV-polymerase chain reaction result showed positive, VGC was administered for 3 months. The 61 cardiac recipients enrolled in this study were divided into 2 groups: non-leucopenia group (n=29) and leucopenia group (n=32). The white blood cell (WBC) counts in the leucopenia group dropped approximately 55.6% in the first month after VGC therapy (pre-VGC WBC count: 5,544 cells/mm(3) vs post-VGC WBC count: 2,460 cells/mm(3), p<0.0001). The most significant difference between the 2 groups was body mass index (BMI, 23.04 vs 25.84, p=0.008), which was the impact factor of VGC-induced leucopenia.

CONCLUSION

Severe leucopenia may develop after VGC therapy in Chinese cardiac recipients, especially those with lower BMI.

Infections Complicating Solid Organ Transplantation

The requirements for immune suppression after solid organ transplantation increases the risk of infection with a myriad of organisms. There are many unique and evolving aspects of infection after solid organ transplantation. Advances in immunosuppressive therapy and improved protocols for infection prophylaxis have resulted in changes in the timing and clinical presentation of opportunistic infections. Vigilance in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected infection in the solid organ transplant recipient is essential. This article reviews the basic evaluation and treatment options for many of the infectious conditions peculiar to the immunosuppressed patient.

24-Week Oral Ganciclovir Prophylaxis in Kidney Recipients Is Associated with Reduced Symptomatic Cytomegalovirus Disease Compared to a 12-Week Course

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with reduced graft and patient survival among kidney recipients. The highest risk of CMV infection occurs in CMV-naive recipients of kidneys from seropositive donors (D+/R-). Optimal CMV prophylaxis is not established. This prospective cohort study compared the safety and efficacy of prophylaxis with 12 versus 24 weeks of oral ganciclovir.

METHODS

We prospectively administered 24 weeks ganciclovir to 31 D+/R- recipients. The control group comprised 39 patients transplanted in the immediately preceding era who received a 12-week course of prophylaxis. All patients received cytolytic therapy within the first month, as well as a tacrolimus-based maintenance regimen. A logistic regression model was fit to examine the relationship between 24 weeks ganciclovir prophylaxis and the odds of developing CMV infection by one year.

RESULTS

Groups were matched, though the 12-week cohort had more delayed graft function than their 24-week counterparts (45% vs. 29%, P=0.04). CMV infection occurred in 31% and 7% patients in the 12-week and 24-week groups, respectively (P<or=0.01). Mean time to development of CMV infection was 17.5+/-2.2 weeks in the 12-week, and 22.0+/-10.0 weeks in the 24-week, groups (P=0.79). Both 24 weeks ganciclovir prophylaxis (O.R. 0.15, 95% C.I. 0.03-0.91, P=0.04) and delayed graft function (O.R. 4.49, 95% C.I. 1.67-36.56, P<0.01) were associated with CMV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for 24 weeks is associated with a lower risk of symptomatic CMV disease than a 12-week course in high risk D+/R- kidney recipients.

Valganciclovir: what is the status in solid organ transplantation?

Prophylactic drug therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients is effective and simple to implement, but it is associated with patient nonadherence and viral resistance. Recent data show that the efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir are similar. However, three large daily doses of oral ganciclovir are required, which is inconvenient, and viral resistance can develop to the drug. The single daily dose and lack of viral resistance are advantages of valganciclovir. This has become the primary agent for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease. Current trials are underway to determine its effectiveness for treatment of cytomegalovirus disease, the optimal length of prophylaxis, and the safety and efficacy of a syrup formulation in children.

A comparative randomised study of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

An open, prospective, randomised study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Eighty-three renal transplant recipients were assigned randomly to receive valacyclovir (n=43) or oral ganciclovir (n=40) for the first 3 months after transplantation. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, primary renal disease, graft source, HLA matching, immunosuppressive therapy and donor-recipient CMV antibody status. CMV infection was diagnosed by detection of virus DNA in plasma with the Amplicor CMV Test. CMV disease was observed in only one patient belonging to the ganciclovir group, who developed enterocolitis 6 months post-transplantation. No difference was observed between the two treatment groups with respect to detection of CMV DNA, virus infections other than CMV, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine levels at 3 and 6 months following transplantation. An increased number of bacterial infections was noted in the ganciclovir group (p 0.003). No adverse reactions with either treatment were reported. The estimated cost of valacyclovir treatment was 20% higher than that of ganciclovir treatment. Overall, both valacyclovir and oral ganciclovir were found to be effective and safe for CMV prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Decisions regarding prophylactic regimens should include additional criteria, such as cost or possible development of resistance.

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and oncogenesis. Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses after transplantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, quantitative molecular tests allow the individualization of antiviral therapies for prevention and treatment of infection. This advance is most prominent in the management of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses. Diagnostic advances have not been accompanied by the development of specific and nontoxic anti-viral agents or effective antiviral vaccines. Vaccines, where available, should be given to patients as early as possible and well in advance of transplantation to optimize the immune response. Studies of viral latency, reactivation, and the cellular effects of viral infection will provide clues for future strategies in prevention and treatment of viral infections.