1
|
Long JJ, Motter JD, Jackson KR, Chen J, Orandi BJ, Montgomery RA, Stegall MD, Jordan SC, Benedetti E, Dunn TB, Ratner LE, Kapur S, Pelletier RP, Roberts JP, Melcher ML, Singh P, Sudan DL, Posner MP, El-Amm JM, Shapiro R, Cooper M, Verbesey JE, Lipkowitz GS, Rees MA, Marsh CL, Sankari BR, Gerber DA, Wellen JR, Bozorgzadeh A, Gaber AO, Heher EC, Weng FL, Djamali A, Helderman JH, Concepcion BP, Brayman KL, Oberholzer J, Kozlowski T, Covarrubias K, Massie AB, McAdams-DeMarco MA, Segev DL, Garonzik-Wang JM. Characterizing the risk of human leukocyte antigen-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in older recipients. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1980-1989. [PMID: 37748554 PMCID: PMC10767749 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Older compatible living donor kidney transplant (CLDKT) recipients have higher mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) compared to younger recipients. These risks may be amplified in older incompatible living donor kidney transplant (ILDKT) recipients who undergo desensitization and intense immunosuppression. In a 25-center cohort of ILDKT recipients transplanted between September 24, 1997, and December 15, 2016, we compared mortality, DCGF, delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and length of stay (LOS) between 234 older (age ≥60 years) and 1172 younger (age 18-59 years) recipients. To investigate whether the impact of age was different for ILDKT recipients compared to 17 542 CLDKT recipients, we used an interaction term to determine whether the relationship between posttransplant outcomes and transplant type (ILDKT vs CLDKT) was modified by age. Overall, older recipients had higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.632.072.65, P < .001), lower DCGF (hazard ratio: 0.360.530.77, P = .001), and AR (odds ratio: 0.390.540.74, P < .001), and similar DGF (odds ratio: 0.461.032.33, P = .9) and LOS (incidence rate ratio: 0.880.981.10, P = 0.8) compared to younger recipients. The impact of age on mortality (interaction P = .052), DCGF (interaction P = .7), AR interaction P = .2), DGF (interaction P = .9), and LOS (interaction P = .5) were similar in ILDKT and CLDKT recipients. Age alone should not preclude eligibility for ILDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane J Long
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jennifer D Motter
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kyle R Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jennifer Chen
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Babak J Orandi
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Robert A Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark D Stegall
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ty B Dunn
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sandip Kapur
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ronald P Pelletier
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - John P Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marc L Melcher
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marc P Posner
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Jose M El-Amm
- Integris Baptist Medical Center, Transplant Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Jennifer E Verbesey
- Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - George S Lipkowitz
- Department of Surgery, Baystate Medical Center Springfield, Massachusetts, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael A Rees
- Department of Urology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher L Marsh
- Department of Surgery, Scripps Clinic and Green Hospital, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - David A Gerber
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jason R Wellen
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Adel Bozorgzadeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - A Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eliot C Heher
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - J Harold Helderman
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Beatrice P Concepcion
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kenneth L Brayman
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jose Oberholzer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tomasz Kozlowski
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Karina Covarrubias
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reese PP, Doshi MD, Hall IE, Besharatian B, Bromberg JS, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Jia Y, Kamoun M, Mansour SG, Akalin E, Harhay MN, Mohan S, Muthukumar T, Schröppel B, Singh P, Weng FL, Parikh CR. Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort. Am J Kidney Dis 2023; 81:222-231.e1. [PMID: 36191727 PMCID: PMC9868058 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Donor acute kidney injury (AKI) activates innate immunity, enhances HLA expression in the kidney allograft, and provokes recipient alloimmune responses. We hypothesized that injury and inflammation that manifested in deceased-donor urine biomarkers would be associated with higher rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and allograft failure after transplantation. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 862 deceased donors for 1,137 kidney recipients at 13 centers. EXPOSURES We measured concentrations of interleukin 18 (IL-18), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in deceased donor urine. We also used the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria to assess donor clinical AKI. OUTCOMES The primary outcome was a composite of BPAR and graft failure (not from death). A secondary outcome was the composite of BPAR, graft failure, and/or de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA). Outcomes were ascertained in the first posttransplant year. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Multivariable Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk. RESULTS Mean recipient age was 54 ± 13 (SD) years, and 82% received antithymocyte globulin. We found no significant associations between donor urinary IL-18, KIM-1, and NGAL and the primary outcome (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR] for highest vs lowest tertile of 0.76 [95% CI, 0.45-1.28], 1.20 [95% CI, 0.69-2.07], and 1.14 [95% CI, 0.71-1.84], respectively). In secondary analyses, we detected no significant associations between clinically defined AKI and the primary outcome or between donor biomarkers and the composite outcome of BPAR, graft failure, and/or de novo DSA. LIMITATIONS BPAR was ascertained through for-cause biopsies, not surveillance biopsies. CONCLUSIONS In a large cohort of kidney recipients who almost all received induction with thymoglobulin, donor injury biomarkers were associated with neither graft failure and rejection nor a secondary outcome that included de novo DSA. These findings provide some reassurance that centers can successfully manage immunological complications using deceased-donor kidneys with AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P Reese
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mona D Doshi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Behdad Besharatian
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jonathan S Bromberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Malek Kamoun
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sherry G Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research and Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Enver Akalin
- Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Meera N Harhay
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension and Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division at Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Livingston, NJ
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mansour SG, Khoury N, Kodali R, Virmani S, Reese PP, Hall IE, Jia Y, Yamamoto Y, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, Obeid W, Doshi MD, Akalin E, Bromberg JS, Harhay MN, Mohan S, Muthukumar T, Singh P, Weng FL, Moledina DG, Greenberg JH, Wilson FP, Parikh CR. Clinically adjudicated deceased donor acute kidney injury and graft outcomes. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264329. [PMID: 35239694 PMCID: PMC8893682 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) in deceased donors is not associated with graft failure (GF). We hypothesize that hemodynamic AKI (hAKI) comprises the majority of donor AKI and may explain this lack of association. METHODS In this ancillary analysis of the Deceased Donor Study, 428 donors with available charts were selected to identify those with and without AKI. AKI cases were classified as hAKI, intrinsic (iAKI), or mixed (mAKI) based on majority adjudication by three nephrologists. We evaluated the associations between AKI phenotypes and delayed graft function (DGF), 1-year eGFR and GF. We also evaluated differences in urine biomarkers among AKI phenotypes. RESULTS Of the 291 (68%) donors with AKI, 106 (36%) were adjudicated as hAKI, 84 (29%) as iAKI and 101 (35%) as mAKI. Of the 856 potential kidneys, 669 were transplanted with 32% developing DGF and 5% experiencing GF. Median 1-year eGFR was 53 (IQR: 41-70) ml/min/1.73m2. Compared to non-AKI, donors with iAKI had higher odds DGF [aOR (95%CI); 4.83 (2.29, 10.22)] and had lower 1-year eGFR [adjusted B coefficient (95% CI): -11 (-19, -3) mL/min/1.73 m2]. hAKI and mAKI were not associated with DGF or 1-year eGFR. Rates of GF were not different among AKI phenotypes and non-AKI. Urine biomarkers such as NGAL, LFABP, MCP-1, YKL-40, cystatin-C and albumin were higher in iAKI. CONCLUSION iAKI was associated with higher DGF and lower 1-year eGFR but not with GF. Clinically phenotyped donor AKI is biologically different based on biomarkers and may help inform decisions regarding organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry G. Mansour
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Nadeen Khoury
- Division of Nephrology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Ravi Kodali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Sarthak Virmani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Peter P. Reese
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Isaac E. Hall
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Yu Yamamoto
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | | | - Wassim Obeid
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Mona D. Doshi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Enver Akalin
- Montefiore-Einstein Kidney Transplant program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Meera N. Harhay
- Department of Internal Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- Tower Health Transplant Institute, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA, United States of America
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States of America
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Pooja Singh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health, Livingston, NJ, United States of America
| | - Dennis G. Moledina
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jason H. Greenberg
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Francis P. Wilson
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Malik RF, Jia Y, Mansour SG, Reese PP, Hall IE, Alasfar S, Doshi MD, Akalin E, Bromberg JS, Harhay MN, Mohan S, Muthukumar T, Schröppel B, Singh P, Weng FL, Thiessen Philbrook HR, Parikh CR. Post-transplant Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Study. Kidney360 2021; 2:1296-1307. [PMID: 35369651 PMCID: PMC8676388 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000862021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background De novo post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication after kidney transplant (KT). Most recent studies are single center with various approaches to outcome ascertainment. Methods In a multicenter longitudinal cohort of 632 nondiabetic adult kidney recipients transplanted in 2010-2013, we ascertained outcomes through detailed chart review at 13 centers. We hypothesized that donor characteristics, such as sex, HCV infection, and kidney donor profile index (KDPI), and recipient characteristics, such as age, race, BMI, and increased HLA mismatches, would affect the development of PTDM among KT recipients. We defined PTDM as hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5%, pharmacological treatment for diabetes, or documentation of diabetes in electronic medical records. We assessed PTDM risk factors and evaluated for an independent time-updated association between PTDM and graft failure using regression. Results Mean recipient age was 52±14 years, 59% were male, 49% were Black. Cumulative PTDM incidence 5 years post-KT was 29% (186). Independent baseline PTDM risk factors included older recipient age (P<0.001) and higher BMI (P=0.006). PTDM was not associated with all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.10; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.55), death-censored graft failure (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.37), or death (aHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.05) at median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range, 4.0-6.9) years post-KT. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression were not different between patients who did and did not develop PTDM. Conclusions PTDM occurred commonly, and higher baseline BMI was associated with PTDM. PTDM was not associated with graft failure or mortality during the 6-year follow-up, perhaps due to the short follow-up time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubab F. Malik
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sherry G. Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut,Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Peter P. Reese
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Isaac E. Hall
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Sami Alasfar
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mona D. Doshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Enver Akalin
- Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Meera N. Harhay
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Tower Health Transplant Institute, Tower Health System, West Reading, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health, Livingston, New Jersey
| | | | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hall IE, Reese PP, Mansour SG, Mohan S, Jia Y, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, Brennan DC, Doshi MD, Muthukumar T, Akalin E, Harhay MN, Schröppel B, Singh P, Weng FL, Bromberg JS, Parikh CR. Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 16:765-775. [PMID: 33692117 PMCID: PMC8259491 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.18101120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection commonly complicates kidney transplantation, contributing to morbidity and allograft failure. The virus is often donor-derived and influenced by ischemia-reperfusion processes and disruption of structural allograft integrity. We hypothesized that deceased-donor AKI associates with BKV infection in recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We studied 1025 kidney recipients from 801 deceased donors transplanted between 2010 and 2013, at 13 academic centers. We fitted Cox proportional-hazards models for BKV DNAemia (detectable in recipient blood by clinical PCR testing) within 1 year post-transplantation, adjusting for donor AKI and other donor- and recipient-related factors. We validated findings from this prospective cohort with analyses for graft failure attributed to BKV within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database. RESULTS The multicenter cohort mean kidney donor profile index was 49±27%, and 26% of donors had AKI. Mean recipient age was 54±13 years, and 25% developed BKV DNAemia. Donor AKI was associated with lower risk for BKV DNAemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.79). In the OPTN database, 22,537 (25%) patients received donor AKI kidneys, and 272 (0.3%) developed graft failure from BKV. The adjusted hazard ratio for the outcome with donor AKI was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS In a well-characterized, multicenter cohort, contrary to our hypothesis, deceased-donor AKI independently associated with lower risk for BKV DNAemia. Within the OPTN database, donor AKI was also associated with lower risk for graft failure attributed to BKV. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_03_10_CJN18101120_final.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E. Hall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Peter Philip Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sherry G. Mansour
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sumit Mohan
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York,Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Daniel C. Brennan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mona D. Doshi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Enver Akalin
- Einstein/Montefiore Abdominal Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Meera Nair Harhay
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Tower Health Transplant Institute, Tower Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Livingston, New Jersey
| | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mansour SG, Liu C, Jia Y, Reese PP, Hall IE, El-Achkar TM, LaFavers KA, Obeid W, El-Khoury JM, Rosenberg AZ, Daneshpajouhnejad P, Doshi MD, Akalin E, Bromberg JS, Harhay MN, Mohan S, Muthukumar T, Schröppel B, Singh P, Weng FL, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, Parikh CR. Uromodulin to Osteopontin Ratio in Deceased Donor Urine Is Associated With Kidney Graft Outcomes. Transplantation 2021; 105:876-885. [PMID: 32769629 PMCID: PMC8805736 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deceased-donor kidneys experience extensive injury, activating adaptive and maladaptive pathways therefore impacting graft function. We evaluated urinary donor uromodulin (UMOD) and osteopontin (OPN) in recipient graft outcomes. METHODS Primary outcomes: all-cause graft failure (GF) and death-censored GF (dcGF). Secondary outcomes: delayed graft function (DGF) and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We randomly divided our cohort of deceased donors and recipients into training and test datasets. We internally validated associations between donor urine UMOD and OPN at time of procurement, with our primary outcomes. The direction of association between biomarkers and GF contrasted. Subsequently, we evaluated UMOD:OPN ratio with all outcomes. To understand these mechanisms, we examined the effect of UMOD on expression of major histocompatibility complex II in mouse macrophages. RESULTS Doubling of UMOD increased dcGF risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.2), whereas OPN decreased dcGF risk (aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1). UMOD:OPN ratio ≤3 strengthened the association, with reduced dcGF risk (aHR, 0.57; 0.41-0.80) with similar associations for GF, and in the test dataset. A ratio ≤3 was also associated with lower DGF (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and higher 6-month eGFR (adjusted β coefficient, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.28-5.11). UMOD increased major histocompatibility complex II expression elucidating a possible mechanism behind UMOD's association with GF. CONCLUSIONS UMOD:OPN ratio ≤3 was protective, with lower risk of DGF, higher 6-month eGFR, and improved graft survival. This ratio may supplement existing strategies for evaluating kidney quality and allocation decisions regarding deceased-donor kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry G. Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Caroline Liu
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter P. Reese
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Isaac E. Hall
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tarek M. El-Achkar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and the Indianapolis VA Medical Center
| | - Kaice A. LaFavers
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and the Indianapolis VA Medical Center
| | - Wassim Obeid
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joe M. El-Khoury
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Avi Z. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Mona D. Doshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meera N. Harhay
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | | | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Motter JD, Jackson KR, Long JJ, Waldram MM, Orandi BJ, Montgomery RA, Stegall MD, Jordan SC, Benedetti E, Dunn TB, Ratner LE, Kapur S, Pelletier RP, Roberts JP, Melcher ML, Singh P, Sudan DL, Posner MP, El-Amm JM, Shapiro R, Cooper M, Verbesey JE, Lipkowitz GS, Rees MA, Marsh CL, Sankari BR, Gerber DA, Wellen JR, Bozorgzadeh A, Gaber AO, Heher EC, Weng FL, Djamali A, Helderman JH, Concepcion BP, Brayman KL, Oberholzer J, Kozlowski T, Covarrubias K, Massie AB, Segev DL, Garonzik-Wang JM. Delayed graft function and acute rejection following HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1612-1621. [PMID: 33370502 PMCID: PMC8016719 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) have pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) that, despite desensitization, may persist or reappear with resulting consequences, including delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). To quantify the risk of DGF and AR in ILDKT and downstream effects, we compared 1406 ILDKTr to 17 542 compatible LDKT recipients (CLDKTr) using a 25-center cohort with novel SRTR linkage. We characterized DSA strength as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF); positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC); or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC). DGF occurred in 3.1% of CLDKT, 3.5% of PLNF, 5.7% of PFNC, and 7.6% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher DGF for PCC recipients (aOR = 1.03 1.682.72 ). However, the impact of DGF on mortality and DCGF risk was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction > .1). AR developed in 8.4% of CLDKT, 18.2% of PLNF, 21.3% of PFNC, and 21.7% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher AR (aOR PLNF = 1.45 2.093.02 ; PFNC = 1.67 2.403.46 ; PCC = 1.48 2.243.37 ). Although the impact of AR on mortality was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction = .1), its impact on DCGF risk was less consequential for ILDKT (aHR = 1.34 1.621.95 ) than CLDKT (aHR = 1.96 2.292.67 ) (p interaction = .004). Providers should consider these risks during preoperative counseling, and strategies to mitigate them should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer D. Motter
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kyle R. Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jane J. Long
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Madeleine M. Waldram
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Babak J. Orandi
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | - Robert A. Montgomery
- The NYU Transplant Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ty B. Dunn
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lloyd E. Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Sandip Kapur
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ronald P. Pelletier
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - John P. Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia. PA
| | - Debra L. Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Marc P. Posner
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Jose M. El-Amm
- Integris Baptist Medical Center, Transplant Division, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Recanti Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Michael A. Rees
- Department of Urology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH
| | | | | | - David A. Gerber
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jason R. Wellen
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Adel Bozorgzadeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Eliot C. Heher
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | | | | | - Jose Oberholzer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Karina Covarrubias
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Allan B. Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jackson KR, Long J, Motter J, Bowring MG, Chen J, Waldram MM, Orandi BJ, Montgomery RA, Stegall MD, Jordan SC, Benedetti E, Dunn TB, Ratner LE, Kapur S, Pelletier RP, Roberts JP, Melcher ML, Singh P, Sudan DL, Posner MP, El-Amm JM, Shapiro R, Cooper M, Verbesey JE, Lipkowitz GS, Rees MA, Marsh CL, Sankari BR, Gerber DA, Wellen J, Bozorgzadeh A, Gaber AO, Heher E, Weng FL, Djamali A, Helderman JH, Concepcion BP, Brayman KL, Oberholzer J, Kozlowski T, Covarrubias K, Desai N, Massie AB, Segev DL, Garonzik-Wang J. Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes. Transplantation 2021; 105:436-442. [PMID: 32235255 PMCID: PMC8080262 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown. METHODS We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes. RESULTS After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates. CONCLUSIONS Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle R. Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jane Long
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Motter
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mary G Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Chen
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Madeleine M. Waldram
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Babak J Orandi
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | - Robert A. Montgomery
- The NYU Transplant Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ty B. Dunn
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lloyd E. Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Sandip Kapur
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ronald P. Pelletier
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - John P. Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia. PA
| | - Debra L. Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Marc P. Posner
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Jose M. El-Amm
- Integris Baptist Medical Center, Transplant Division, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Recanti Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Michael A. Rees
- Department of Urology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH
| | | | | | - David A. Gerber
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jason Wellen
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Adel Bozorgzadeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Eliot Heher
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | | | | | - Jose Oberholzer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Karina Covarrubias
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Niraj Desai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Allan B. Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alasfar S, Hall IE, Mansour SG, Jia Y, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, Weng FL, Singh P, Schröppel B, Muthukumar T, Mohan S, Malik RF, Harhay MN, Doshi MD, Akalin E, Bromberg JS, Brennan DC, Reese PP, Parikh CR. Contemporary incidence and risk factors of post transplant Erythrocytosis in deceased donor kidney transplantation. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:26. [PMID: 33435916 PMCID: PMC7802150 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02231-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-Transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) has not been studied in large recent cohorts. In this study, we evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of PTE with current transplant practices using the present World Health Organization criteria to define erythrocytosis. We also tested the hypothesis that the risk of PTE is greater with higher-quality kidneys. METHODS We utilized the Deceased Donor Study which is an ongoing, multicenter, observational study of deceased donors and their kidney recipients that were transplanted between 2010 and 2013 across 13 centers. Eryrthocytosis is defined by hemoglobin> 16.5 g/dL in men and> 16 g/dL in women. Kidney quality is measured by Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). RESULTS Of the 1123 recipients qualified to be in this study, PTE was observed at a median of 18 months in 75 (6.6%) recipients. Compared to recipients without PTE, those with PTE were younger [mean 48±11 vs 54±13 years, p < 0.001], more likely to have polycystic kidney disease [17% vs 6%, p < 0.001], have received kidneys from younger donors [36 ±13 vs 41±15 years], and be on RAAS inhibitors [35% vs 22%, p < 0.001]. Recipients with PTE were less likely to have received kidneys from donors with hypertension [16% vs 32%, p = 0.004], diabetes [1% vs 11%, p = 0.008], and cerebrovascular event (24% vs 36%, p = 0.036). Higher KDPI was associated with decreased PTE risk [HR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99)]. Over 60 months of follow-up, only 17 (36%) recipients had sustained PTE. There was no association between PTE and graft failure or mortality, CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PTE was low in our study and PTE resolved in majority of patients. Lower KDPI increases risk of PTE. The underutilization of RAAS inhibitors in PTE patients raises the possibility of under-recognition of this phenomenon and should be explored in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Alasfar
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument St., Suite 416, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sherry G Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Francis L Weng
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rubab F Malik
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meera N Harhay
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mona D Doshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan S Bromberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel C Brennan
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter P Reese
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mansour SG, Hall IE, Reese PP, Jia Y, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Moeckel G, Weng FL, Revelo MP, Khalighi MA, Trivedi A, Doshi MD, Schröppel B, Parikh CR. Reliability of deceased-donor procurement kidney biopsy images uploaded in United Network for Organ Sharing. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13441. [PMID: 30387908 PMCID: PMC6317379 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Prior studies demonstrate poor agreement among pathologists' interpretation of kidney biopsy slides. Reliability of representative images of these slides uploaded to the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) web portal for clinician review has not been studied. We hypothesized high agreement among pathologists' image interpretation, since static images eliminate variation induced by viewing different areas of movable slides. To test our hypothesis, we compared the assessments of UNOS-uploaded images recorded in standardized forms by three pathologists. We selected 100 image sets, each having at least two images from kidneys of deceased donors. Weighted Cohen's kappa was used for inter-rater agreement. Mean (SD) donor age was 50 (13). Acute tubular injury had kappas of 0.12, 0.14, and 0.19; arteriolar hyalinosis 0.16, 0.27, and 0.38; interstitial inflammation 0.30, 0.33, and 0.49; interstitial fibrosis 0.28, 0.32, and 0.67; arterial intimal fibrosis 0.34, 0.42, and 0.59; tubular atrophy 0.35, 0.41, and 0.52; glomeruli thrombi 0.32, 0.53, and 0.85; and global glomerulosclerosis 0.68, 0.70, and 0.77. Pathologists' agreement demonstrated kappas of 0.12 to 0.77. The lower values raise concern about the reliability of using images. Although further research is needed to understand how uploaded images are used clinically, the field may consider higher-quality standards for biopsy photomicrographs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry G Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Gilbert Moeckel
- Division of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Monica P Revelo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mazdak A Khalighi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Anshu Trivedi
- Division of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Chirag R Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hall IE, Akalin E, Bromberg JS, Doshi MD, Greene T, Harhay MN, Jia Y, Mansour SG, Mohan S, Muthukumar T, Reese PP, Schröppel B, Singh P, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, Weng FL, Parikh CR. Deceased-donor acute kidney injury is not associated with kidney allograft failure. Kidney Int 2018; 95:199-209. [PMID: 30470437 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Deceased-donor acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with organ discard and delayed graft function, but data on longer-term allograft survival are limited. We performed a multicenter study to determine associations between donor AKI (from none to severe based on AKI Network stages) and all-cause graft failure, adjusting for donor, transplant, and recipient factors. We examined whether any of the following factors modified the relationship between donor AKI and graft survival: kidney donor profile index, cold ischemia time, donation after cardiac death, expanded-criteria donation, kidney machine perfusion, donor-recipient gender combinations, or delayed graft function. We also evaluated the association between donor AKI and a 3-year composite outcome of all-cause graft failure or estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 in a subcohort of 30% of recipients. Among 2,430 kidneys transplanted from 1,298 deceased donors, 585 (24%) were from donors with AKI. Over a median follow-up of 4.0 years, there were no significant differences in graft survival by donor AKI stage. We found no evidence that pre-specified variables modified the effect of donor AKI on graft survival. In the subcohort, donor AKI was not associated with the 3-year composite outcome. Donor AKI was not associated with graft failure in this well-phenotyped cohort. Given the organ shortage, the transplant community should consider measures to increase utilization of kidneys from deceased donors with AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E Hall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan S Bromberg
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mona D Doshi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Tom Greene
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Meera N Harhay
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sherry G Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Pooja Singh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sydney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Chirag R Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weng FL, Morgievich MM, Kandula P. The Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors: How Long Is Too Long? Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 72:472-474. [PMID: 30244695 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, RWJ Barnabas Health, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ.
| | - Marie M Morgievich
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, RWJ Barnabas Health, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| | - Praveen Kandula
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, RWJ Barnabas Health, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hall IE, Parikh CR, Schröppel B, Weng FL, Jia Y, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Reese PP, Doshi MD. Procurement Biopsy Findings Versus Kidney Donor Risk Index for Predicting Renal Allograft Survival. Transplant Direct 2018; 4:e373. [PMID: 30255133 PMCID: PMC6092182 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to maximize transplantation by matching organ quality to recipient longevity require reliable tools. The US kidney allocation system uses the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) for this purpose, and many centers additionally rely on donor biopsies. The Leuven score combines donor age with procurement histology (glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy) to predict allograft survival. METHODS We compared KDRI with Leuven scores for associations with kidney discard, delayed graft function, and allograft function and survival. We used Cox, modified Poisson, and linear regression to calculate risks based on KDRI and (separately) Leuven scores, adjusting for important transplant and recipient variables. RESULTS From 890 donors, 1729 kidneys were procured and biopsied. Five hundred eighty-five (34%) kidneys were discarded. Median donor age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44-61 years). Median KDRI and Leuven scores were 1.56 (IQR, 1.28-1.90) and 59 (IQR, 49-69). Relative risk for discard was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.24) per 0.2-unit increase in KDRI and 1.38 (1.31-1.46) per 10-unit increase in Leuven score. Adjusted relative risks for delayed graft function were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.02) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99), adjusted hazard ratios for graft failure were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04-1.16) and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.21), and adjusted linear regression coefficients for 3-year estimated glomerular filtration rate were -3.88 (-4.63 to -3.13) and -5.18 (-6.19 to -4.18). CONCLUSIONS In kidneys clinically selected for procurement biopsy, the Leuven score was more strongly associated with discard but performed similarly to KDRI for predicting transplant outcomes, suggesting the need to reevaluate current procurement biopsy practices. Given modest associations for both tools; however, neither KDRI nor the Leuven score should be used in isolation for individual organ acceptance decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E. Hall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | - Yaqi Jia
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Peter P. Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mona D. Doshi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Harhay MN, Jia Y, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Besharatian B, Gumber R, Weng FL, Hall IE, Doshi M, Schroppel B, Parikh CR, Reese PP. The association of discharge decisions after deceased donor kidney transplantation with the risk of early readmission: Results from the deceased donor study. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13215. [PMID: 29393541 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplant (KT) recipients experience high rates of early (≤30 days) hospital readmission (EHR) after KT, and existing studies provide limited data on modifiable discharge factors that may mitigate EHR risk. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of 468 adult deceased donor KT recipients transplanted between 4/2010 and 11/2013 at 5 United States transplant centers. We fit multivariable mixed effects models to assess the association of two potentially modifiable discharge factors with the probability of EHR after KT: (i) weekend discharge and (ii) days to first scheduled follow-up. RESULTS Among 468 KT recipients, 38% (n = 178) experienced EHR after KT. In fully adjusted analyses, compared to weekday discharges, KT recipients discharged on the weekend had a 29% lower risk of EHR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.94). Compared to follow-up within 2 days of discharge, KT recipients with follow-up within 3 to 6 days had a 28% higher probability of EHR (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13-1.45). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that clinical decisions related to the timing of discharge and follow-up modify EHR risk after KT, independent of traditional risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera Nair Harhay
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Behdad Besharatian
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ramnika Gumber
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Francis L Weng
- Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | | | - Mona Doshi
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Peter P Reese
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chi J, Ma Y, Weng FL, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Parikh CR, Du H. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering analysis of urine from deceased donors as a prognostic tool for kidney transplant outcome. J Biophotonics 2017; 10:1743-1755. [PMID: 28485029 PMCID: PMC5680137 DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201700019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
We report the utility of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) analysis of urine from deceased donors for prognosis of kidney transplant outcomes. Iodide-modified silver nanoparticles were used as the enabler for sensitive measurements of urine proteins. Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were employed for the statistical analysis of the SERS data. Thirty urine samples in three classes were analysed. The ATN class consists of donors whose kidneys had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), the most common type of acute kidney injury (AKI) with high risk of poor graft performance in recipients, yet yielded acceptable transplant outcome. The DGF class is comprised of donors whose kidney had delayed graft function (DGF) in recipients. The control class includes donors whose kidneys did not have donor ATN or recipient DGF. We show a sensitivity of more than 90 % in differentiating the ATN class from the DGF and control classes. Our methodology can thus help clinicians choose kidneys in the high-risk ATN category for transplant which would otherwise be discarded. Our research is impactful in that it could serve as a valuable guidance to expand the deceased donor pool to include those perceived as high-risk AKI type based on common urinary biomarkers. Picutre: Scheme of SERS analysis of urine samples from deceased donors for kidney transplant outcome indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingmao Chi
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
| | - Yiwei Ma
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA
| | | | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Henry Du
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weng FL, Peipert JD, Holland BK, Brown DR, Waterman AD. A Clustered Randomized Trial of an Educational Intervention During Transplant Evaluation to Increase Knowledge of Living Donor Kidney Transplant. Prog Transplant 2017; 27:377-385. [PMID: 29187135 DOI: 10.1177/1526924817732021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maximizing education about living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) during the in-person evaluation at the transplant center may increase the numbers of kidney patients pursuing LDKT. Research Questions and Design: To test the effectiveness of a 1-time LDKT educational intervention, we performed a cluster-randomized trial among 499 patients who presented for evaluation of kidney transplant. We compared usual care education (n = 250) versus intensive LDKT education (n = 249), which was implemented only on the evaluation day and consisted of viewing a 25-minute video of information and stories about LDKT and discussion of LDKT possibilities with an educator. Our primary outcome was knowledge of LDKT, 1 week after the transplant evaluation. RESULTS One week after evaluation, patients who received intensive education had higher knowledge than patients who received usual care (12.7 vs. 11.7; P = .0008), but there were no differences in postevaluation readiness for LDKT. Among patients who had not previously identified a potential living donor, receiving intensive education was associated with increased willingness to take steps toward LDKT. DISCUSSION In conclusion, expansion of LDKT education within the evaluation day may be helpful, but interventions that are implemented at multiple times and for greater duration may be necessary to ensure larger and long-term behavioral changes in pursuit of LDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- 1 Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.,2 Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - John D Peipert
- 3 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Diane R Brown
- 2 Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Amy D Waterman
- 3 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moledina DG, Hall IE, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Reese PP, Weng FL, Schröppel B, Doshi MD, Wilson FP, Coca SG, Parikh CR. Performance of Serum Creatinine and Kidney Injury Biomarkers for Diagnosing Histologic Acute Tubular Injury. Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 70:807-816. [PMID: 28844586 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI), which is currently defined as an increase in serum creatinine (Scr) concentration, provides little information on the condition's actual cause. To improve phenotyping of AKI, many urinary biomarkers of tubular injury are being investigated. Because AKI cases are not frequently biopsied, the diagnostic accuracy of concentrations of Scr and urinary biomarkers for histologic acute tubular injury is unknown. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis from multicenter prospective cohort. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS Hospitalized deceased kidney donors on whom kidney biopsies were performed at the time of organ procurement for histologic evaluation. PREDICTORS (1) AKI diagnosed by change in Scr concentration during donor hospitalization and (2) concentrations of urinary biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], liver-type fatty acid-binding protein [L-FABP], interleukin 18 [IL-18], and kidney injury molecule 1 [KIM-1]) measured at organ procurement. OUTCOME Histologic acute tubular injury. RESULTS Of 581 donors, 98 (17%) had mild acute tubular injury and 57 (10%) had severe acute tubular injury. Overall, Scr-based AKI had poor diagnostic performance for identifying histologic acute tubular injury and 49% of donors with severe acute tubular injury did not have AKI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of change in Scr concentration for diagnosing severe acute tubular injury was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.49-0.67) and for any acute tubular injury was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.45-0.58). Compared with Scr concentration, NGAL concentration demonstrated higher AUROC for diagnosing both severe acute tubular injury (0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74; P=0.03) and any acute tubular injury (0.60; 95% CI, 0.55-0.66; P=0.005). In donors who did not have Scr-based AKI, NGAL concentrations were higher with increasing severities of acute tubular injury (subclinical AKI). However, compared with Scr concentration, AUROCs for acute tubular injury diagnosis were not significantly higher for urinary L-FABP, IL-18, or KIM-1. LIMITATIONS The spectrum of AKI cause in deceased donors may be different from that of a general hospitalized population. CONCLUSIONS Concentrations of Scr and kidney injury biomarkers (L-FABP, IL-18, and KIM-1) lack accuracy for diagnosing acute tubular injury in hospitalized deceased donors. Although urinary NGAL concentration had slightly higher discrimination for acute tubular injury than did Scr concentration, its overall AUROC was still modest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis G Moledina
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - F Perry Wilson
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT
| | - Steven G Coca
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weng FL, Grogan T, Patel AM, Mulgaonkar S, Morgievich MM. Characteristics of compatible pair participants in kidney paired donation at a single center. Clin Transplant 2017; 31:10.1111/ctr.12978. [PMID: 28342273 PMCID: PMC5831242 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Compatible pairs of living kidney donors and their intended recipients can enter into kidney paired donation (KPD) and facilitate additional living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs). We examined 11 compatible pairs (the intended recipients and their intended, compatible donors) who participated in KPD, along with the recipients' 11 matched, exchange donors. The 11 pairs participated in 10 separate exchanges (three were multicenter exchanges) that included 33 total LDKTs (22 additional LDKTs). All the intended donors were blood group O and female, with a mean living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI) of 27.6 (SD 16.8). The matched donors had a mean LKDPI of 9.4 (SD 31.7). Compatible pairs entered KPD for altruistic reasons (N=2) or due to mismatch of age (N=7) or body/kidney size (N=2) between the recipient and intended donor. In four cases, retrospective calculation of the LKDPI revealed that the matched donor had a higher LKDPI than the intended donor. Of the 22 recipients of LDKTs enabled by the compatible pairs, three were highly sensitized, with PRA >80%. In conclusion, most compatible pairs entered into KPD so that the recipient could receive a LDKT transplant from a donor whose age or body/kidney size were more favorable to post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L. Weng
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
- Rutgers School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Tracy Grogan
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Anup M. Patel
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Shamkant Mulgaonkar
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Marie M. Morgievich
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mansour SG, Puthumana J, Reese PP, Hall IE, Doshi MD, Weng FL, Schröppel B, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Bimali M, Parikh CR. Associations between Deceased-Donor Urine MCP-1 and Kidney Transplant Outcomes. Kidney Int Rep 2017; 2:749-758. [PMID: 28730184 PMCID: PMC5512592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Existing methods to predict recipient allograft function during deceased-donor kidney procurement are imprecise. Understanding the potential renal reparative role for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a cytokine involved in macrophage recruitment after injury, might help to predict allograft outcomes. Methods We conducted a substudy of the multicenter prospective Deceased Donor Study cohort that evaluated deceased kidney donors from 5 organ procurement organizations from May 2010 to December 2013. We measured urine MCP-1 (uMCP-1) concentrations from donor samples collected at nephrectomy to determine associations with donor acute kidney injury (AKI), recipient delayed graft function (DGF), 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and graft failure. We also assessed perfusate MCP-1 concentrations from pumped kidneys for associations with DGF and 6-month eGFR. Results AKI occurred in 111 donors (9%). The median (interquartile range) uMCP-1 concentration was higher in donors with AKI compared with donors without AKI (1.35 [0.41–3.93] ng/ml vs. 0.32 [0.11–0.80] ng/ml, P < 0.001). DGF occurred in 756 recipients (31%), but uMCP-1 was not independently associated with DGF. Higher donor uMCP-1 concentrations were independently associated with a higher 6-month eGFR in those without DGF (0.77 [0.10–1.45] ml/min per 1.73 m2 per doubling of uMCP1). However, there were no independent associations between uMCP-1 and graft failure over a median follow-up of ∼2 years. Lastly, perfusate MCP-1 concentrations significantly increased during pump perfusion but were not associated with DGF or 6-month eGFR. Discussion Donor uMCP-1 concentrations were modestly associated with higher recipient 6-month eGFR in those without DGF. However, the results suggest that donor uMCP-1 has minimal clinical utility given no associations with graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Mansour
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - J Puthumana
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - P P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - I E Hall
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - F L Weng
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| | - B Schröppel
- Section of Nephrology, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - H Thiessen-Philbrook
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - M Bimali
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - C R Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Weng FL, Lee DC, Dhillon N, Tibaldi KN, Davis LA, Patel AM, Goldberg RJ, Morgievich M, Mulgaonkar S. Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:1934-9. [PMID: 27569925 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) can be impeded by multiple barriers. One possible barrier to LDKT is a large physical distance between the living donor's home residence and the procuring transplant center. METHODS We performed a retrospective, single-center study of living kidney donors in the United States who were geographically distant (residing ≥150 miles) from our transplant center. Each distant donor was matched to 4 geographically nearby donors (<150 miles from our center) as controls. RESULTS From 2007 to 2010, of 429 live kidney donors, 55 (12.8%) were geographically distant. Black donors composed a higher proportion of geographically distant vs nearby donors (34.6% vs 15.5%), whereas Hispanic and Asian donors composed a lower proportion (P = .001). Distant vs nearby donors had similar median times from donor referral to actual donation (165 vs 161 days, P = .81). The geographically distant donors lived a median of 703 miles (25% to 75% range, 244 to 1072) from our center and 21.2 miles (25% to 75% range, 9.8 to 49.7) from the nearest kidney transplant center. The proportion of geographically distant donors who had their physician evaluation (21.6%), psychosocial evaluation (21.6%), or computed tomography angiogram (29.4%) performed close to home, rather than at our center, was low. CONCLUSIONS Many geographically distant donors live close to transplant centers other than the procuring transplant center, but few of these donors perform parts of their donor evaluation at these closer centers. Black donors comprise a large proportion of geographically distant donors. The evaluation of geographically distant donors, especially among minorities, warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA; Rutgers School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
| | - D C Lee
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - N Dhillon
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - K N Tibaldi
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - L A Davis
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - A M Patel
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - R J Goldberg
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - M Morgievich
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - S Mulgaonkar
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Davis LA, Grogan TM, Cox J, Weng FL. Inter- and Intrapersonal Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplant among Black Recipients and Donors. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2016; 4:671-679. [PMID: 27519479 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-016-0270-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is more common among Blacks, but Blacks are less likely to receive a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to identify barriers and coping mechanisms that Black LDKT recipients and donors experienced while receiving or donating a kidney. DESIGN A qualitative study was conducted using structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used for data interpretation. PARTICIPANTS All 20 participants identified as Black, with two participants identifying themselves as multiracial. The mean age for the 14 recipients was 60, and the average age for the 6 living donors was 47. RESULTS Themes emerging from the data suggest both recipients and donors faced barriers in the LDKT experience. Recipients faced barriers associated with their denial and avoidance of the severity of their ESRD, their desire to maintain the privacy of their health status, and their refusal to approach potential donors. Donors encountered negative responses from others about the donors' desire to donate and the initial refusal of recipients to accept a LDKT offer. Recipients identified faith as a coping mechanism, while donors identified normalization of donation as their method of coping. Various types of social support helped donors and recipients navigate the transplant process. CONCLUSION Black LDKT recipients and donors must overcome barriers prior to receiving or donating a kidney. Most of these barriers arise from communication and interactions with others that are either lacking or undesirable. Future interventions to promote LDKT among Blacks may benefit by specifically targeting these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LaShara A Davis
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Road, Livingston, NJ, 07039, USA. .,School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, 4 Huntington St, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| | - Tracy M Grogan
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Road, Livingston, NJ, 07039, USA
| | - Joy Cox
- School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, 4 Huntington St, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Road, Livingston, NJ, 07039, USA.,Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers University, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Puthumana J, Hall IE, Reese PP, Schröppel B, Weng FL, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Doshi MD, Rao V, Lee CG, Elias JA, Cantley LG, Parikh CR. YKL-40 Associates with Renal Recovery in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 28:661-670. [PMID: 27451287 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2016010091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Deceased donor kidneys with AKI are often discarded for fear of poor transplant outcomes. Donor biomarkers that predict post-transplant renal recovery could improve organ selection and reduce discard. We tested whether higher levels of donor urinary YKL-40, a repair phase protein, associate with improved recipient outcomes in a prospective cohort study involving deceased kidney donors from five organ procurement organizations. We measured urinary YKL-40 concentration in 1301 donors (111 had AKI, defined as doubling of serum creatinine) and ascertained outcomes in the corresponding 2435 recipients, 756 of whom experienced delayed graft function (DGF). Donors with AKI had higher urinary YKL-40 concentration (P<0.001) and acute tubular necrosis on procurement biopsies (P=0.05). In fully adjusted analyses, elevated donor urinary YKL-40 concentration associated with reduced risk of DGF in both recipients of AKI donor kidneys (adjusted relative risk, 0.51 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.32 to 0.80] for highest versus lowest YKL-40 tertile) and recipients of non-AKI donor kidneys (adjusted relative risk, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97]). Furthermore, in the event of DGF, elevated donor urinary YKL-40 concentration associated with higher 6-month eGFR (6.75 [95% CI, 1.49 to 12.02] ml/min per 1.73 m2) and lower risk of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.94]). These findings suggest that YKL-40 is produced in response to tubular injury and is independently associated with recovery from AKI and DGF. If ultimately validated as a prognostic biomarker, urinary YKL-40 should be considered in determining the suitability of donor kidneys for transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Puthumana
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and.,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey
| | | | - Mona D Doshi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Veena Rao
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and
| | - Chun Geun Lee
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and
| | - Jack A Elias
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and
| | - Lloyd G Cantley
- Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and .,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Section of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Parikh CR, Hall IE, Bhangoo RS, Ficek J, Abt PL, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Lin H, Bimali M, Murray PT, Rao V, Schröppel B, Doshi MD, Weng FL, Reese PP. Associations of Perfusate Biomarkers and Pump Parameters With Delayed Graft Function and Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft Function. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:1526-39. [PMID: 26695524 PMCID: PMC4844819 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Revised: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) is increasingly used in deceased donor kidney transplantation, but controversy exists regarding the value of perfusion biomarkers and pump parameters for assessing organ quality. We prospectively determined associations between perfusate biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], kidney injury molecule 1, IL-18 and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein [L-FABP]) and pump parameters (resistance and flow) with outcomes of delayed graft function (DGF) and 6-mo estimated GFR (eGFR). DGF occurred in 230 of 671 (34%) recipients. Only 1-h flow was inversely associated with DGF. Higher NGAL or L-FABP concentrations and increased resistance were inversely associated with 6-mo eGFR, whereas higher flow was associated with higher adjusted 6-mo eGFR. Discarded kidneys had consistently higher median resistance and lower median flow than transplanted kidneys, but median perfusate biomarker concentrations were either lower or not significantly different in discarded compared with transplanted kidneys. Notably, most recipients of transplanted kidneys with isolated "undesirable" biomarker levels or HMP parameters experienced acceptable 6-mo allograft function, suggesting these characteristics should not be used in isolation for discard decisions. Additional studies must confirm the utility of combining HMP measurements with other characteristics to assess kidney quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag R. Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
| | - Isaac E. Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Joseph Ficek
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Peter L. Abt
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather Thiessen-Philbrook
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Haiqun Lin
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Milan Bimali
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Patrick T. Murray
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Veena Rao
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Bernd Schröppel
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Peter P. Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Allograft dysfunction after a kidney transplant is often clinically asymptomatic and is usually detected as an increase in serum creatinine level with corresponding decrease in glomerular filtration rate. The diagnostic evaluation may include blood tests, urinalysis, transplant ultrasonography, radionuclide imaging, and allograft biopsy. Whether it occurs early or later after transplant, allograft dysfunction requires prompt evaluation to determine its cause and subsequent management. Acute rejection, medication toxicity from calcineurin inhibitors, and BK virus nephropathy can occur early or later. Other later causes include transplant glomerulopathy, recurrent glomerulonephritis, and renal artery stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Goldberg
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
| | - Francis L Weng
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Praveen Kandula
- Renal & Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Potluri VS, Parikh CR, Hall IE, Ficek J, Doshi MD, Butrymowicz I, Weng FL, Schröppel B, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Reese PP. Validating Early Post-Transplant Outcomes Reported for Recipients of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 11:324-31. [PMID: 26668026 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.06950615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Data reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) are used in kidney transplant research, policy development, and assessment of center quality, but the accuracy of early post-transplant outcome measures is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS The Deceased Donor Study (DDS) is a prospective cohort study at five transplant centers. Research coordinators manually abstracted data from electronic records for 557 adults who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation between April of 2010 and November of 2013. We compared the post-transplant outcomes of delayed graft function (DGF; defined as dialysis in the first post-transplant week), acute rejection, and post-transplant serum creatinine reported to the OPTN with data collected for the DDS. RESULTS Median kidney donor risk index was 1.22 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.97-1.53). Median recipient age was 55 (IQR, 46-63) years old, 63% were men, and 47% were black; 93% had received dialysis before transplant. Using DDS data as the gold standard, we found that pretransplant dialysis was not reported to the OPTN in only 11 (2%) instances. DGF in OPTN data had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 84% to 93%) and specificity of 98% (95% CI, 96% to 99%). Surprisingly, the OPTN data accurately identified acute allograft rejection in only 20 of 47 instances (n=488; sensitivity of 43%; 95% CI, 17% to 73%). Across participating centers, sensitivity of acute rejection varied widely from 23% to 100%, whereas specificity was uniformly high (92%-100%). Six-month serum creatinine values in DDS and OPTN data had high concordance (n=490; Lin concordance correlation =0.90; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS OPTN outcomes for recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants have high validity for DGF and 6-month allograft function but lack sensitivity in detecting rejection. Future studies using OPTN data may consider focusing on allograft function at 6 months as a useful outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu S Potluri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, Connecticut;
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph Ficek
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Reese PP, Hall IE, Weng FL, Schröppel B, Doshi MD, Hasz RD, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Ficek J, Rao V, Murray P, Lin H, Parikh CR. Associations between Deceased-Donor Urine Injury Biomarkers and Kidney Transplant Outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 27:1534-43. [PMID: 26374609 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2015040345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Assessment of deceased-donor organ quality is integral to transplant allocation practices, but tools to more precisely measure donor kidney injury and better predict outcomes are needed. In this study, we assessed associations between injury biomarkers in deceased-donor urine and the following outcomes: donor AKI (stage 2 or greater), recipient delayed graft function (defined as dialysis in first week post-transplant), and recipient 6-month eGFR. We measured urinary concentrations of microalbumin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), IL-18, and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) from 1304 deceased donors at organ procurement, among whom 112 (9%) had AKI. Each biomarker strongly associated with AKI in adjusted analyses. Among 2441 kidney transplant recipients, 31% experienced delayed graft function, and mean±SD 6-month eGFR was 55.7±23.5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) In analyses adjusted for donor and recipient characteristics, higher donor urinary NGAL concentrations associated with recipient delayed graft function (highest versus lowest NGAL tertile relative risk, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.43). Linear regression analyses of 6-month recipient renal function demonstrated that higher urinary NGAL and L-FABP concentrations associated with slightly lower 6-month eGFR only among recipients without delayed graft function. In summary, donor urine injury biomarkers strongly associate with donor AKI but provide limited value in predicting delayed graft function or early allograft function after transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | - Rick D Hasz
- Gift of Life Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Joseph Ficek
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Veena Rao
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Patrick Murray
- School of Medicine & Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; and
| | - Haiqun Lin
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hall IE, Schröppel B, Doshi MD, Ficek J, Weng FL, Hasz RD, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Reese PP, Parikh CR. Associations of deceased donor kidney injury with kidney discard and function after transplantation. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:1623-31. [PMID: 25762442 PMCID: PMC4563988 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2014] [Revised: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Deceased donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) are often discarded due to fear of poor outcomes. We performed a multicenter study to determine associations of AKI (increasing admission-to-terminal serum creatinine by AKI Network stages) with kidney discard, delayed graft function (DGF) and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In 1632 donors, kidney discard risk increased for AKI stages 1, 2 and 3 (compared to no AKI) with adjusted relative risks of 1.28 (1.08-1.52), 1.82 (1.45-2.30) and 2.74 (2.0-3.75), respectively. Adjusted relative risk for DGF also increased by donor AKI stage: 1.27 (1.09-1.49), 1.70 (1.37-2.12) and 2.25 (1.74-2.91), respectively. Six-month eGFR, however, was similar across AKI categories but was lower for recipients with DGF (48 [interquartile range: 31-61] vs. 58 [45-75] ml/min/1.73m(2) for no DGF, p < 0.001). There was significant favorable interaction between donor AKI and DGF such that 6-month eGFR was progressively better for DGF kidneys with increasing donor AKI (46 [29-60], 49 [32-64], 52 [36-59] and 58 [39-71] ml/min/1.73m(2) for no AKI, stage 1, 2 and 3, respectively; interaction p = 0.05). Donor AKI is associated with kidney discard and DGF, but given acceptable 6-month allograft function, clinicians should consider cautious expansion into this donor pool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E. Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Bernd Schröppel
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Joseph Ficek
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hall IE, Bhangoo RS, Reese PP, Doshi MD, Weng FL, Hong K, Lin H, Han G, Hasz RD, Goldstein MJ, Schröppel B, Parikh CR. Glutathione S-transferase iso-enzymes in perfusate from pumped kidneys are associated with delayed graft function. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:886-96. [PMID: 24612768 PMCID: PMC4051136 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Revised: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 12/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Accurate and reliable assessment tools are needed in transplantation. The objective of this prospective, multi-center study was to determine the associations of the alpha and pi iso-enzymes of glutathione S-transferase (GST), measured from perfusate solution at the start and end (base and post) of kidney allograft machine perfusion, with subsequent delayed graft function (DGF). We also compared GST iso-enzyme perfusate levels from discarded versus transplanted kidneys. A total of 428 kidneys were linked to outcomes as recorded by the United Network of Organ Sharing. DGF, defined as any dialysis in the first week of transplant, occurred in 141 recipients (32%). Alpha- and pi-GST levels significantly increased during machine perfusion. The adjusted relative risks (95% confidence interval) of DGF with each log-unit increase in base and post pi-GST were 1.14 (1.0-1.3) and 1.36 (1.1-1.8), respectively. Alpha-GST was not independently associated with DGF. There were no significant differences in GST values between discarded and transplanted kidneys, though renal resistance was significantly higher in discarded kidneys. We found pi-GST at the end of machine perfusion to be independently associated with DGF. Further studies should elucidate the utility of GST for identifying injured kidneys with regard to organ allocation, discard and recipient management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E. Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Peter P. Reese
- Renal Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Kwangik Hong
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Haiqun Lin
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Gang Han
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | - Bernd Schröppel
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
,University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
,Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hall IE, Reese PP, Weng FL, Schröppel B, Doshi MD, Hasz RD, Reitsma W, Goldstein MJ, Hong K, Parikh CR. Preimplant histologic acute tubular necrosis and allograft outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 9:573-82. [PMID: 24558049 PMCID: PMC3944773 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.08270813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2013] [Accepted: 12/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The influence of deceased-donor AKI on post-transplant outcomes is poorly understood. The few published studies about deceased-donor preimplant biopsy have reported conflicting results regarding associations between AKI and recipient outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This multicenter study aimed to evaluate associations between deceased-donor biopsy reports of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and delayed graft function (DGF), and secondarily for death-censored graft failure, first adjusting for the kidney donor risk index and then stratifying by donation after cardiac death (DCD) status. RESULTS Between March 2010 and April 2012, 651 kidneys (369 donors, 4 organ procurement organizations) were biopsied and subsequently transplanted, with ATN reported in 110 (17%). There were 262 recipients (40%) who experienced DGF and 38 (6%) who experienced graft failure. DGF occurred in 45% of kidneys with reported ATN compared with 39% without ATN (P=0.31) resulting in a relative risk (RR) of 1.13 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.9 to 1.43) and a kidney donor risk index-adjusted RR of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.41). There was no significant difference in graft failure for kidneys with versus without ATN (8% versus 5%). In stratified analyses, the adjusted RR for DGF with ATN was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.34) for non-DCD kidneys and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.23 to 2.06) for DCD kidneys (P=0.02 for the interaction between ATN and DCD on the development of DGF). CONCLUSIONS Despite a modest association with DGF for DCD kidneys, this study reveals no significant associations overall between preimplant biopsy-reported ATN and the outcomes of DGF or graft failure. The potential benefit of more rigorous ATN reporting is unclear, but these findings provide little evidence to suggest that current ATN reports are useful for predicting graft outcomes or deciding to accept or reject allograft offers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac E. Hall
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | - Rick D. Hasz
- Gift of Life Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Michael J. Goldstein
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine and New York Organ Donor Network, New York, New York; and
| | - Kwangik Hong
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Program of Applied Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant frequently used following solid organ transplantation, including renal transplantation. Peripheral neuropathy is an uncommon neurological side effect of tacrolimus and has rarely been reported in renal transplantation. We report a patient who received a living-related donor kidney transplant and presented with altered mental status and new-onset bilateral foot drop. Laboratory tests including cerebrospinal fluid tests excluded infection, and MRI of the brain showed chronic microvascular ischaemic changes. Electromyography and nerve conduction study confirmed bilateral common peroneal nerve demyelination. He was also found to have inadvertently overdosed on tacrolimus at home. After switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine, the patient's symptoms improved within 5 months. His renal function was maintained with an immunosuppressant regimen of cyclosporine, prednisone and mycophenolic acid. The prompt recognition of tacrolimus as a potential neurotoxic drug in a patient with renal transplant and substituting tacrolimus with a different immunosuppressant may prevent permanent neurological damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geru Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine Residency Program, St. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Weng FL, Brown DR, Peipert JD, Holland B, Waterman AD. Protocol of a cluster randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase knowledge of living donor kidney transplant among potential transplant candidates. BMC Nephrol 2013; 14:256. [PMID: 24245948 PMCID: PMC3840671 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2013] [Accepted: 11/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The best treatment option for end-stage renal disease is usually a transplant, preferably a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT). The most effective ways to educate kidney transplant candidates about the risks, benefits, and process of LDKT remain unknown. Methods/design We report the protocol of the Enhancing Living Donor Kidney Transplant Education (ELITE) Study, a cluster randomized trial of an educational intervention to be implemented during initial transplant evaluation at a large, suburban U.S. transplant center. Five hundred potential transplant candidates are cluster randomized (by date of visit) to receive either: (1) standard-of-care (“usual”) transplant education, or (2) intensive education that is based upon the Explore Transplant series of educational materials. Intensive transplant education includes viewing an educational video about LDKT, receiving print education, and meeting with a transplant educator. The primary outcome consists of knowledge of the benefits, risks, and process of LDKT, assessed one week after the transplant evaluation. As a secondary outcome, knowledge and understanding of LDKT are assessed 3 months after the evaluation. Additional secondary outcomes, assessed one week and 3 months after the evaluation, include readiness, self-efficacy, and decisional balance regarding transplant and LDKT, with differences assessed by race. Although the unit of randomization is the date of the transplant evaluation visit, the unit of analysis will be the individual potential transplant candidate. Discussion The ELITE Study will help to determine how education in a transplant center can best be designed to help Black and non-Black patients learn about the option of LDKT. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT01261910
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Road, East Wing, Suite 305, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nguyen KN, Patel AM, Weng FL. Ionizing radiation exposure among kidney transplant recipients due to medical imaging during the pretransplant evaluation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8:833-9. [PMID: 23393106 PMCID: PMC3641612 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03990412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 12/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for malignancies. One recognized risk for malignancy is ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study was to determine, among kidney transplant recipients, the medical imaging procedures that contribute to radiation exposure and their cumulative radiation exposure, as a result of their pretransplant evaluation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Medical records of patients who received a first, kidney-alone transplant during 2008 at a single transplant center were examined. This study identified medical imaging procedures that were performed as prerequisites for deceased donor wait-listing or receipt of live donor kidney transplants and to maintain active status on the wait list. Frequencies of medical imaging procedures and cumulative effective doses of radiation were calculated. RESULTS Among the 172 kidney transplant recipients, 905 procedures were performed. Seventy patients (40.7%) were exposed to low dose (0-20 mSv), 51 (29.7%) were exposed to moderate dose (>20-50 mSv), 28 (16.3%) were exposed to high dose (>50-100 mSv), and 23 (13.4%) were exposed to very high dose (>100 mSv) cumulative effective radiation. Nuclear stress tests accounted for 82.9% of the total radiation exposure. In multivariate analysis, older age, diabetes, and black race were associated with exposure to >20 mSv radiation during the pretransplant evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplant recipients are exposed to large amounts of ionizing radiation from medical imaging during the pretransplant evaluation. The effects of radiation upon malignancy risk and strategies to reduce this radiation exposure warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim N. Nguyen
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey; and
| | - Anup M. Patel
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey; and
| | - Francis L. Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey; and
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
CONTEXT Kidney transplant is usually the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease; however, transplant rates remain low in the United States. More research is needed about patients' educational needs to ensure that patients are making informed decisions about their treatment options. OBJECTIVE To examine patients' perceptions of the delivery and format of a kidney transplant education program in a clinical setting, specifically to (1) identify useful aspects of the transplant education process, (2) discuss aspects of the program delivery that need improvement, and (3) provide recommendations to enhance the education delivery and format surrounding kidney transplant. DESIGN A descriptive study using focus group meetings with patients at different stages of the transplantation process (in evaluation, listed, and transplant recipients). Data were analyzed by using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Use of printed materials and handouts, group education format, and patient advocate component as well as bringing a companion were all effective aspects of the education program. Concerns about the education program stemmed from its complexity, technicality, and length. Participants recommended that patients be sent a formal invitation letter, with a detailed agenda and a video on kidney transplant, and that patients be encouraged to bring a companion to the education program. Responses specific to the stage of the transplant process are presented. CONCLUSION Concentrated attention to the delivery and content of the transplant education programs may significantly assist with patients' outcomes throughout the transplant process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rula Wilson
- University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Weng FL, Reese PP, Waterman AD, Soto AG, Demissie K, Mulgaonkar S. Health care follow-up by live kidney donors more than three yr post-nephrectomy. Clin Transplant 2012; 26:E300-6. [PMID: 22686954 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01660.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Live kidney donors are advised to follow up regularly with healthcare providers to monitor kidney function and to diagnose and treat relevant comorbidities. We sought to determine the frequency and correlates of follow-up care among live kidney donors. METHODS We sent a mailed questionnaire to 606 live kidney donors from a single center who were at least three yr post-nephrectomy. RESULTS We received usable responses from 276 (45.5%), at a median of 6.2 yr post-donation. Compared with non-responders, responding donors were more likely to be older (p < 0.001), female (p = 0.002), white (p < 0.001), and married to the recipient (p < 0.001). In the prior year, 87.7% of respondents reported seeing a physician or other healthcare professional, and 79.0% had seen a "general doctor" such as their primary care provider. In univariable analyses of live kidney donors who responded to our survey, lack of medical follow-up in the past year was associated with younger age, current lack of health insurance, and infrequent contact with the transplant recipient. CONCLUSIONS Most responding live kidney donors had seen a healthcare provider within the past year. To improve donors' follow-up, transplant centers can consider targeting donors who are younger or lack health insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Weng FL, Dhillon N, Lin Y, Mulgaonkar S, Patel AM. Racial differences in outcomes of the evaluation of potential live kidney donors: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Nephrol 2012; 35:409-15. [PMID: 22517188 DOI: 10.1159/000337949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2011] [Accepted: 03/03/2012] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the USA, the lower rate of live donor kidney transplant among Black transplant candidates may stem from lower rates of donation among potential live donors who are Black. We determined whether outcomes of the evaluation of potential live kidney donors varied according to the potential donors' demographic characteristics. METHODS We performed a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study of 1,179 potential live kidney donors, who came forward between 2000 and 2007. Potential donors' intended recipients were first-time transplant recipients who were evaluated between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS There were 268 (22.7%) potential live kidney donors who were Black, of whom 93.7% were recruited by Black transplant candidates. Donor outcomes included actual donation (38.3%), exclusion due to blood group or crossmatch incompatibility (20.4%), exclusion due to medical contraindication to donation (13.7%), and lack of further donor interest (11.2%). Black (vs. non-Black) potential donors were less likely to actually donate (27.2 vs. 41.6%, p < 0.001). Black potential donors were more likely to stop pursuing live donation (p = 0.047) or be excluded from donation for medical reasons (p = 0.008) or blood group or crossmatch incompatibility (p = 0.01). These racial differences persisted in a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model of factors associated with outcomes of the donor evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Potential live kidney donors who are Black are less likely to actually donate. Future studies should determine whether paired exchange and desensitization programs decrease these racial differences and why Black potential donors appear more likely to stop pursuing live donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA. fweng @ barnabashealth.org
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Israni AK, Weng FL, Cen YY, Joffe M, Kamoun M, Feldman HI. Electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications and kidney function after deceased donor kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2010; 25:E124-31. [PMID: 20977496 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01340.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-adherence with immunosuppressive medications can result in allograft rejection and eventually allograft loss. METHODS In a racially diverse population, we utilized microelectronic cap monitors to determine the association of adherence with a single immunosuppressive medication and kidney allograft outcomes post-transplantation. This prospective cohort study enrolled 243 patients from eight transplant centers to provide adherence and kidney allograft outcomes data. To determine the association of adherence with change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), we fit mixed effects models with the outcome being change in eGFR over time. We also fit Cox proportional hazards models to determine the association of adherence with time to persistent 25% and 50% decline in eGFR. RESULTS The distribution of adherence post-transplant was as follows: 164 (68%), 49 (20%), and 30 (12%) had >85-100%, 50-85%, and <50% adherence, respectively. Seventy-nine (33%) and 36 (15%) of the subjects experienced a persistent 25% decline in eGFR or allograft loss and 50% decline in eGFR or allograft loss during follow-up. Adherence was not associated with acute rejection or 25% decline or 50% decline in eGFR. In the adjusted and unadjusted model, adherence and black race were not associated with change in eGFR over time. CONCLUSIONS Non-adherence with a single immunosuppressive medication was not associated with kidney allograft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay K Israni
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, 701 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55415-1829, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Weng FL, Reese PP, Mulgaonkar S, Patel AM. Barriers to living donor kidney transplantation among black or older transplant candidates. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:2338-47. [PMID: 20876682 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03040410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Lower rates of living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) among transplant candidates who are black or older may stem from lower likelihoods of (1) recruiting potential living donors or (2) potential donors actually donating (donor "conversion"). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed to determine race, age, and gender differences in LDKT, donor recruitment, and donor conversion. RESULTS Of 1617 kidney transplant candidates, 791 (48.9%) recruited at least one potential living donor, and 452 (28.0%) received LDKTs. Black transplant candidates, versus non-blacks, were less likely to receive LDKTs (20.5% versus 30.6%, relative risk [RR] = 0.67), recruit potential living donors (43.9% versus 50.7%, RR = 0.86), and receive LDKTs if they had potential donors (46.8% versus 60.3%, RR = 0.78). Transplant candidates ≥60 years, versus candidates 18 to <40 years old, were less likely to receive LDKTs (15.1% versus 43.2%, RR = 0.35), recruit potential living donors (34.0% versus 64.6%, RR = 0.53), and receive LDKTs if they had potential donors (44.5% versus 66.8%, RR = 0.67). LDKT and donor recruitment did not differ by gender. Race and age differences persisted in multivariable logistic regression models. Among 339 candidates who recruited potential donors but did not receive LDKTs, blacks (versus non-blacks) were more likely to have potential donors who failed to donate because of a donor-related reason (86.9% versus 72.5%). CONCLUSIONS Black or older kidney transplant candidates were less likely to receive LDKTs because of lower likelihoods of donor recruitment and donor conversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Weng FL, Pancoska C, Patel AM. Fatal graft-versus-host disease presenting as fever of unknown origin in a pancreas-after-kidney transplant recipient. Am J Transplant 2008; 8:881-3. [PMID: 18294353 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02150.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of pancreas transplantation. We describe a 54-year-old male with type 1 diabetes who received a zero-antigen mismatched pancreas-after-kidney transplant from a pancreas donor who was homozygous at the HLA-B, -Cw, -DR, and -DQ alleles. Starting on postoperative day (POD) #22, the patient developed persistent fevers. Workup was notable only for low-grade cytomegalovirus viremia, which was treated. The fevers eventually disappeared. On POD #106, the patient was noted to have a diffuse erythematous rash. A skin biopsy was consistent with GVHD. Short tandem repeat DNA analysis of both peripheral blood lymphocytes and skin demonstrated mixed chimerism, confirming the diagnosis of GHVD. Soon after diagnosis, the patient developed pancytopenia and fevers and died of multiorgan failure on POD #145. Transplant clinicians should consider GVHD as a possible, although admittedly rare, cause of fevers of unknown origin in recipients of pancreas transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Patel AM, Pancoska C, Mulgaonkar S, Weng FL. Renal transplantation in patients with pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies and negative flow cytometry crossmatches. Am J Transplant 2007; 7:2371-7. [PMID: 17845571 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01944.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), despite negative cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs), is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 living donor renal transplant recipients, all with pre-transplant cytotoxicity and T-cell and B-cell FCXMs that were negative. Twenty recipients had pre-transplant DSA detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and/or microbead methods. Forty contemporaneous DSA-negative controls were selected. In the DSA-positive group, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months (25-75% range, 5.4-22.8 months), patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 95.0%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) developed in four patients (20.0%). Three of the AHR episodes occurred within the first month post-transplant. Median serum creatinine at last follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL (25-75% range, 1.0-1.6 mg/dL), versus 1.1 mg/dL (25-75% range, 0.9-1.4 mg/dL) in the DSA-negative controls (p = 0.29). Only one of the 40 controls developed AHR (2.5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with a significantly increased incidence of AHR (p = 0.02 by log-rank test). In conclusion, despite negative pre-transplant cytotoxicity and FCXMs, renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant DSA detected by solid-phase methods may have an increased incidence of AHR and require close monitoring post-transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Patel
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Weng FL, Shults J, Leonard MB, Stallings VA, Zemel BS. Risk factors for low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in otherwise healthy children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86:150-8. [PMID: 17616775 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/86.1.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations serve as a biomarker for vitamin D stores. Prior studies have not examined the risk factors for low vitamin D concentrations in a multiethnic sample of US youth across a broad age range. OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with low concentrations of 25(OH)D in children and adolescents. DESIGN Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured in 382 healthy children aged 6-21 y living in the northeastern United States. Dietary and supplemental vitamin D intake was assessed by interview. Fat and lean mass were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with decreased concentrations of 25(OH)D. RESULTS The median concentration of 25(OH)D was 28 ng/mL (interquartile range: 19-35 ng/mL), and 55% of subjects had 25(OH)D concentrations <30 ng/mL. 25(OH)D concentrations were inversely correlated with parathyroid hormone concentrations (Spearman's r=-0.31, P<0.001) but were not significantly correlated with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations. In the multivariable model, older age (P<0.001), black race [odds ratio (OR): 14.2; 95% CI: 8.53, 23.5], wintertime study visit (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 2.29, 5.50), and total daily vitamin D intake <200 IU (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.46) were associated with low vitamin D concentrations. Fat and lean mass were not independently associated with vitamin D status in this healthy-weight sample. CONCLUSION Low serum 25(OH)D concentrations are prevalent in otherwise healthy children and adolescents in the northeastern United States and are related to low vitamin D intake, race, and season.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Weng FL, Patel AM, Wanchoo R, Brahmbhatt Y, Ribeiro K, Uknis ME, Mulgaonkar S, Mathis AS. Oral Ganciclovir Versus Low-Dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Recipients of Kidney and Pancreas Transplants. Transplantation 2007; 83:290-6. [PMID: 17297403 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000251371.34968.ca] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal regimen for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation remains unclear. We compared the effectiveness of three months of oral ganciclovir (3 g/day) versus low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) for CMV prophylaxis. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at our center who received kidney and/or pancreas transplants between January 2000 and April 2003. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relationship between baseline covariates, including type of CMV prophylaxis, and time to development of CMV disease. RESULTS Of the 500 patients (295 ganciclovir, 205 valganciclovir), 22 patients (4.4%) developed CMV disease (mean time to CMV disease, 163+/-85 days). Sixteen of the ganciclovir patients (5.4%) and six of the valganciclovir patients (2.9%) developed CMV disease (P=0.18). By CMV serostatus, the incidence of CMV disease during the first posttransplant year was 8.5% among donor-seropositive, recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) patients, 8.6% among D+/R+ patients, 2.9% among D-/R+ patients, 1.0% among D-/R- patients, and 0.9% among patients for whom documentation of CMV serostatus was incomplete. In the unadjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, race/ethnicity, type of transplant, type of antiviral prophylaxis, CMV serostatus, and use of mycophenolate mofetil were each associated with risk of developing CMV disease. In the adjusted, multivariable model, only CMV serostatus was associated with development of CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS Three months of low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) was as effective as ganciclovir (3 g/day) for prophylaxis of CMV disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Department of Medicine, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Weng FL, Joffe MM, Feldman HI, Mange KC. Rates of completion of the medical evaluation for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46:734-45. [PMID: 16183429 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2005] [Accepted: 06/15/2005] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to complete the medical evaluation for renal transplantation may impede access to transplantation and preclude the possibility of preemptive transplantation. We sought to (1) characterize completion rates of the transplantation medical evaluation and (2) determine factors associated with completion of the evaluation. We hypothesized that patients not on dialysis therapy complete the evaluation process more quickly than patients receiving dialysis. METHODS Between September 2002 and September 2003, a total of 175 patients who were evaluated for renal transplantation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire. The progress of patients' medical evaluations, including completion of requested tests and evaluations, was extracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS During follow-up, 100 patients (57.1%) completed the evaluation, including tests and evaluations requested by the transplant team, whereas 49 patients (28.0%) had tests still pending. The remaining patients died (2.3%), lost interest in transplantation (1.1%), or were immediately (7.4%) or later (4.0%) declared medically ineligible for transplantation. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, black race (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 1.00; P = 0.05) was associated with time to completion of the transplantation evaluation, but receiving maintenance dialysis at the time of the initial transplantation evaluation was not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.42; P = 0.72). CONCLUSION Completion of the medical evaluation for transplantation is slower in blacks than nonblacks. We were unable to detect a significant difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in rates of completion of the evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Weng FL, Israni AK, Joffe MM, Hoy T, Gaughan CA, Newman M, Abrams JD, Kamoun M, Rosas SE, Mange KC, Strom BL, Brayman KL, Feldman HI. Race and electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications after deceased donor renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:1839-48. [PMID: 15800121 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2004121059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonadherence to immunosuppressive medications may partly explain the worse allograft outcomes among black recipients of renal transplants. In a prospective cohort study of recipients of deceased donor renal transplants, microelectronic cap monitors were placed on bottles of one immunosuppressive medication to (1) measure average daily percentage adherence during the first posttransplantation year and (2) determine the factors associated with adherence. A total of 278 transplant recipients who provided sufficient microelectronic adherence data were grouped into four categories of average daily percentage adherence: 95 to 100% adherence (41.0% of patients), 80 to 95% adherence (32.4%), 50 to 80% adherence (12.9%), and 0 to 50% adherence (13.7%). In the unadjusted ordinal logistic regression model, black race was associated with decreased adherence (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.72; P = 0.001). Cause of renal disease, Powerful Others health locus of control, transplant center, and dosing frequency were also associated with adherence. After adjustment for transplant center and dosing frequency, the association between black race and decreased adherence was substantially attenuated (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.14, P = 0.13). Transplant center (P = 0.003) and increased dosing frequency (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86, for three or four times per day dosing; OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.45, for daily dosing; versus two times per day dosing; P = 0.003) remained independently associated with adherence. Other baseline demographic, socioeconomic, medical, surgical, and psychosocial characteristics were not associated with adherence. The transplant center and dosing frequencies of immunosuppressive medications are associated with adherence and explain a substantial proportion of the race-adherence relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 923 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Weng FL, Shults J, Herskovitz RM, Zemel BS, Leonard MB. Vitamin D insufficiency in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in remission. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20:56-63. [PMID: 15602667 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-004-1694-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2004] [Revised: 08/12/2004] [Accepted: 08/13/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations are the best indicator of vitamin D nutritional status. We measured serum 25(OH)D concentrations in 94 healthy controls and in 41 subjects (aged 4-22 years) with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) in remission. Children with remitted SSNS had significantly lower 25(OH)D concentrations than healthy controls (median 16.4 ng/ml versus 23.9 ng/ml, P<0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, the odds ratios (OR) of vitamin D insufficiency [25(OH)D <20 ng/ml] were independently increased in SSNS subjects [OR 11.2 (95% confidence interval 3.5-36.2)], non-whites [OR 12.9 (4.6-36.2)], older children [OR 1.20 per year (1.06-1.36)], and winter months [OR 6.7 (2.5-18.4)]. Within the SSNS subjects, multiple linear regression determined that serum 25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with SSNS disease characteristics measured in this study, such as duration of disease, number of relapses, cumulative glucocorticoids, and interval since last relapse. In conclusion, children with remitted SSNS have lower serum 25(OH)D concentrations than healthy controls. This difference persisted after adjusting for the potential confounding effects of age, race, season, and milk intake. Children with remitted SSNS may benefit from routine measurement of 25(OH)D, but the clinical significance of low 25(OH)D in this population remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preemptive renal transplantation (PRT) has been associated with improved allograft and patient survival rates and requires that the medical evaluation for suitability for transplantation occurs before the initiation of maintenance dialysis. The aim of this study was to understand the factors associated with the timing of evaluation for renal transplantation relative to the initiation of dialysis. METHODS In a prospective study, patients who presented to the Renal Transplant Evaluation Clinic at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania completed a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Of the 290 patients included in the analysis, 44.5% were not yet on dialysis. Non-dialysis-dependent persons had seen a nephrologist for a mean of 71.0 +/- 84.7 months before transplant evaluation, whereas persons who presented for nonpreemptive evaluation reported first seeing a nephrologist a mean of 25.0 +/- 42.8 months before dialysis initiation (P < 0.001). First learning about transplantation from somebody other than a nephrologist significantly increased the odds of undergoing nonpreemptive transplant evaluation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.46; P = 0.01). The odds of nonpreemptive evaluation were decreased for every additional 3 months of chronic renal disease care by a nephrologist (adjusted OR, 0.96; P < 0.001) and significantly decreased if the patient reported having a spouse as a potential donor (adjusted OR, 0.41; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION There is substantial opportunity for transplant evaluation before dialysis initiation that is not capitalized on and is affected by the duration of care provided by a nephrologist and the type of potential living donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Percutaneous catheter-based thrombolysis is commonly used in association with angioplasty to treat thrombosed hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts. Although major complications of these percutaneous procedures are relatively uncommon, they can result in several potentially serious complications, including pulmonary embolism, cerebral embolism, arterial embolism, bleeding with perigraft hematoma or hemorrhage, and vein rupture. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical significance, and management of these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Renal, Electrolyte, and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|