1
|
Tang E, Yantsis A, Ho M, Hussain J, Dano S, Aiyegbusi OL, Peipert JD, Mucsi I. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With CKD: The Case for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Tools. Am J Kidney Dis 2024; 83:508-518. [PMID: 37924931 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD), kidney failure, and kidney replacement therapies are associated with high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Symptoms change with disease progression or transition between treatment modalities and frequently go unreported and unmanaged. Tools that reliably monitor symptoms may improve the management of patients with CKD. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess symptom severity; physical, psychological, social, and cognitive functioning; treatment-related side effects; and HRQOL. Systematic use of PROMs can improve patient-provider communication, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and HRQOL. Potential barriers to their use include a lack of engagement, response burden, and limited guidance about PROM collection, score interpretation, and workflow integration. Well-defined, acceptable, and effective clinical response pathways are essential for implementing PROMs. PROMs developed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) address some challenges and may be suitable for clinical use among patients with CKD. PROMIS tools assess multiple patient-valued, clinically actionable symptoms and functions. They can be administered as fixed-length, customized short forms or computer adaptive tests, offering precise measurement across a range of symptom severities or function levels, tailored questions to individuals, and reduced question burden. Here we provide an overview of the potential use of PROMs in CKD care, with a focus on PROMIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Tang
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyssa Yantsis
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Ho
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Junayd Hussain
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sumaya Dano
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olalekan L Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham (OLA), Birmingham, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peipert JD, Chang J, Li S, di Pietro A, Cislo P, Cappelleri JC, Cella D. Reliability, validity, and change thresholds of the NCCN/FACT Bladder Symptom Index (NFBlSI-18) in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Cancer 2024; 130:31-40. [PMID: 37823532 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NCCN/FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBlSI-18) is a bladder cancer-specific instrument. We aimed to psychometrically evaluate the reliability and validity of NFBlSI-18 and estimate change thresholds for total, disease-related symptoms-physical (DRS-P), DRS-emotional (DRS-E), and function/well-being (F/WB) scales in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). METHODS JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial data were analyzed. Anchors to evaluate validity included: 5-level EuroQoL-5D utility index (EQ-5D-5L UI), visual analog scale (VAS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and number of symptoms. Responsiveness to change was tested by anchoring to time to tumor progression (TTP), best overall response (BOR), and differences in means between ECOG categories to estimate meaningful between-group differences. Meaningful within-group change thresholds were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, anchoring to change in EQ-5D-5L UI. Significant within-individual patient change thresholds were estimated with reliable and likely change indexes. RESULTS Correlations with EQ-5D-5L UI and VAS ranged from 0.53 to 0.73. Standardized effect sizes were >0.20. Compared with patients with TTP of ≥6 months, patients with TTP of >0-2 and 3-5 months had larger declines; results for BOR were similar. Thresholds (points) for meaningful between-group differences were: total, 6-11; DRS-P, 3-6; and DRS-E and F/WB, 1. Thresholds (points) for meaningful within-group worsening were: total, 4; and DRS-P, 3, and for significant individual change they were: total, 3-9; DRS-P, 2-6; DRS-E, 1-3; and F/WB, 2-4. CONCLUSIONS NFBlSI-18 exhibited evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness to assess quality of life in studies of la/mUC, and change thresholds are established for future studies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY The NCCN/FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBlSI-18) is a questionnaire used to assess quality of life for people with advanced bladder cancer. People with advanced bladder cancer who took part in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 study completed the NFBlSI-18 when they joined the study and after each treatment with avelumab maintenance or best supportive care. This study showed that NFBlSI-18 is suitable for capturing bladder cancer symptoms and is able to detect important changes in a person's quality of life over time. This study also provides thresholds for changes in NFBlSI-18 scores, which will be useful for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Si Li
- Pfizer, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perry LM, Peipert JD, Kircher SM, Cantoral J, Penedo FJ, Garcia SF. Adverse COVID-19 experiences and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: indirect effects of COVID-19-related depression and financial burden. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:71. [PMID: 37458820 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00601-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivors are at greater risk for poor health outcomes due to COVID-19. However, the pandemic's impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is not well known. This study hypothesized that cancer survivors' adverse COVID-19 experiences would be associated with worse HRQoL. Further, this association would be moderated by psychosocial resiliency factors (perceived social support, benefits, and ability to manage stress) and mediated by psychosocial risk factors (anxiety, depression; health, financial and social concerns). METHODS 1,043 cancer survivors receiving care at Northwestern Medicine completed a cross-sectional survey on COVID-19 practical and psychosocial concerns from 6/2021 to 3/2022. Participants reported on 21 adverse COVID-19 experiences (e.g., COVID-19 hospitalization, death of family/friends, loss of income, medical delays). The survey assessed 9 psychosocial factors related to COVID-19: anxiety, depression; health care, financial, and social disruptions; health care satisfaction; social support, perceived benefits, and stress management skills. The FACT-G7 assessed HRQoL. Hypotheses were tested in a structural equation model. The number of reported adverse COVID-19 experiences was the primary (observed) independent variable. The dependent variable of HRQoL, and the proposed mediating and moderating factors, were entered as latent variables indicated by their respective survey items. Latent interaction terms between the independent variable and each resiliency factor tested moderation effects. Analyses were adjusted for demographic and COVID-specific variables. RESULTS Participants were, on average, aged 58 years and diagnosed with cancer 4.9 years prior. They were majority female (73.3%), White (89.6%), non-Hispanic/Latino (94.5%), college-educated (81.7%), and vaccinated for COVID-19 (95.5%). An average of 3.8 adverse COVID-19 experiences were reported. Results of structural equation modeling demonstrated that the association between adverse COVID-19 experiences and HRQoL was explained by indirect effects through COVID-19-related depression (β = - 0.10, percentile bootstrap 95% CI - 0.15 to - 0.07) and financial concerns (β = - 0.04, percentile bootstrap 95% CI - 0.07 to - 0.01). Hypotheses testing moderation by resiliency factors were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Adverse COVID-19 experiences were associated with higher depression symptoms and financial concerns about COVID-19, and in turn, worse HRQoL. Oncology clinics should be cognizant of the experience of adverse COVID-19 events when allocating depression and financial support resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Perry
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - John D Peipert
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sheetal M Kircher
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jackelyn Cantoral
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank J Penedo
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee MK, Peipert JD, Cella D, Yost KJ, Eton DT, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Dueck AC. Identifying meaningful change on PROMIS short forms in cancer patients: a comparison of item response theory and classic test theory frameworks. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:1355-1367. [PMID: 36152109 PMCID: PMC10123030 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03255-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares classical test theory and item response theory frameworks to determine reliable change. Reliable change followed by anchoring to the change in categorically distinct responses on a criterion measure is a useful method to detect meaningful change on a target measure. METHODS Adult cancer patients were recruited from five cancer centers. Baseline and follow-up assessments at 6 weeks were administered. We investigated short forms derived from PROMIS® item banks on anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, and sleep disturbance. We detected reliable change using reliable change index (RCI). We derived the T-scores corresponding to the RCI calculated under IRT and CTT frameworks using PROMIS® short forms. For changes that were reliable, meaningful change was identified using patient-reported change in PRO-CTCAE by at least one level. For both CTT and IRT approaches, we applied one-sided tests to detect reliable improvement or worsening using RCI. We compared the percentages of patients with reliable change and reliable/meaningful change. RESULTS The amount of change in T score corresponding to RCICTT of 1.65 ranged from 5.1 to 9.2 depending on domains. The amount of change corresponding to RCIIRT of 1.65 varied across the score range, and the minimum change ranged from 3.0 to 8.2 depending on domains. Across domains, the RCICTT and RCIIRT classified 80% to 98% of the patients consistently. When there was disagreement, the RCIIRT tended to identify more patients as having reliably changed compared to RCICTT if scores at both timepoints were in the range of 43 to 78 in anxiety, 45 to 70 in depression, 38 to 80 in fatigue, 35 to 78 in sleep disturbance, and 48 to 74 in pain interference, due to smaller standard errors in these ranges using the IRT method. The CTT method found more changes compared to IRT for the pain intensity domain that was shorter in length. Using RCICTT, 22% to 66% had reliable change in either direction depending on domains, and among these patients, 62% to 83% had meaningful change. Using RCIIRT, 37% to 68% had reliable change in either direction, and among these patients, 62% to 81% had meaningful change. CONCLUSION Applying the two-step criteria demonstrated in this study, we determined how much change is needed to declare reliable change at different levels of baseline scores. We offer reference values for percentage of patients who meaningfully change for investigators using the PROMIS instruments in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji K Lee
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Kathleen J Yost
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David T Eton
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Paul J Novotny
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jeff A Sloan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Amylou C Dueck
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perry LM, Morken V, Peipert JD, Yanez B, Garcia SF, Barnard C, Hirschhorn LR, Linder JA, Jordan N, Ackermann RT, Harris A, Kircher S, Mohindra N, Aggarwal V, Frazier R, Coughlin A, Bedjeti K, Weitzel M, Nelson EC, Elwyn G, Van Citters AD, O'Connor M, Cella D. Patient-Reported Outcome Dashboards Within the Electronic Health Record to Support Shared Decision-making: Protocol for Co-design and Clinical Evaluation With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38461. [PMID: 36129747 PMCID: PMC9536520 DOI: 10.2196/38461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes-symptoms, treatment side effects, and health-related quality of life-are important to consider in chronic illness care. The increasing availability of health IT to collect patient-reported outcomes and integrate results within the electronic health record provides an unprecedented opportunity to support patients' symptom monitoring, shared decision-making, and effective use of the health care system. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study are to co-design a dashboard that displays patient-reported outcomes along with other clinical data (eg, laboratory tests, medications, and appointments) within an electronic health record and conduct a longitudinal demonstration trial to evaluate whether the dashboard is associated with improved shared decision-making and disease management outcomes. METHODS Co-design teams comprising study investigators, patients with advanced cancer or chronic kidney disease, their care partners, and their clinicians will collaborate to develop the dashboard. Investigators will work with clinic staff to implement the co-designed dashboard for clinical testing during a demonstration trial. The primary outcome of the demonstration trial is whether the quality of shared decision-making increases from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include longitudinal changes in satisfaction with care, self-efficacy in managing treatments and symptoms, health-related quality of life, and use of costly and potentially avoidable health care services. Implementation outcomes (ie, fidelity, appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, reach, adoption, and sustainability) during the co-design process and demonstration trial will also be collected and summarized. RESULTS The dashboard co-design process was completed in May 2020, and data collection for the demonstration trial is anticipated to be completed by the end of July 2022. The results will be disseminated in at least one manuscript per study objective. CONCLUSIONS This protocol combines stakeholder engagement, health care coproduction frameworks, and health IT to develop a clinically feasible model of person-centered care delivery. The results will inform our current understanding of how best to integrate patient-reported outcome measures into clinical workflows to improve outcomes and reduce the burden of chronic disease on patients and health care systems. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/38461.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Perry
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Victoria Morken
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Cynthia Barnard
- Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Robert J Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jeffrey A Linder
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Neil Jordan
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Ronald T Ackermann
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Alexandra Harris
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sheetal Kircher
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nisha Mohindra
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Vikram Aggarwal
- Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Rebecca Frazier
- Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ava Coughlin
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Katy Bedjeti
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Melissa Weitzel
- Northwestern Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Eugene C Nelson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Aricca D Van Citters
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Mary O'Connor
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rabin EE, Kim M, Mozny A, Cardoza K, Bell AC, Zhai L, Bommi P, Lauing KL, King AL, Armstrong TS, Walunas TL, Fang D, Roy I, Peipert JD, Sieg E, Mi X, Amidei C, Lukas RV, Wainwright DA. A systematic review of pharmacologic treatment efficacy for depression in older patients with cancer. Brain Behav Immun Health 2022; 21:100449. [PMID: 35368609 PMCID: PMC8968450 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
7
|
Hussain J, Chawla G, Rafiqzad H, Huang S, Bartlett SJ, Li M, Howell D, Peipert JD, Novak M, Mucsi I. Validation of the PROMIS sleep disturbance item bank computer adaptive test (CAT) in patients on renal replacement therapy. Sleep Med 2022; 90:36-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
8
|
Ip EH, Saldana S, Miller KD, Carlos RC, Gareen IF, Sparano JA, Graham N, Zhao F, Lee JW, O’Connell NS, Cella D, Peipert JD, Gray RJ, Wagner LI. Tolerability of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in a phase 3 clinical trial with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: A trajectory analysis of adverse events. Cancer 2021; 127:4546-4556. [PMID: 34726788 PMCID: PMC8887554 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND E5103 was a study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab. It was a negative trial for the end points of invasive disease-free survival and overall survival. The current work examines the tolerability of bevacizumab and other medication exposures with respect to clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS Adverse events (AEs) collected from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were summarized to form an AE profile at each treatment cycle. All-grade and high-grade events were separately analyzed. The change in the AE profile over the treatment cycle was delineated as distinct AE trajectory clusters. AE-related and any-reason early treatment discontinuations were treated as clinical outcome measures. PROs were measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast + Lymphedema. The relationships between the AE trajectory and early treatment discontinuation as well as PROs were analyzed. RESULTS More than half of all AEs (57.5%) were low-grade. A cluster of patients with broad and mixed AE (all-grade) trajectory grades was significantly associated with any-reason early treatment discontinuation (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; P = .01) as well as AE-related discontinuation (OR, 4.14; P = .001). This cluster had the highest count of all-grade AEs per cycle in comparison with other clusters. Another cluster of patients with primary neuropathic AEs in their trajectories had poorer physical well-being in comparison with a trajectory of no or few AEs (P < .01). A high-grade AE trajectory did not predict discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS A sustained and cumulative burden of across-the-board toxicities, which were not necessarily all recognized as high-grade AEs, contributed to early treatment discontinuation. Patients with neuropathic all-grade AEs may require additional attention for preventing deterioration in their physical well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H. Ip
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Santiago Saldana
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathy D. Miller
- Hematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ruth C. Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Department of Epidemiology and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Noah Graham
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nathaniel S. O’Connell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J. Gray
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Waterman AD, Peipert JD, Cui Y, Beaumont JL, Paiva A, Lipsey AF, Anderson CS, Robbins ML. Your Path to Transplant: A randomized controlled trial of a tailored expert system intervention to increase knowledge, attitudes, and pursuit of kidney transplant. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1186-1196. [PMID: 33245618 PMCID: PMC7882639 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Individually tailoring education over time may help more patients, especially racial/ethnic minorities, get waitlisted and pursue deceased and living donor kidney transplant (DDKT and LDKT, respectively). We enrolled 802 patients pursuing transplant evaluation at the University of California, Los Angeles Transplant Program into a randomized education trial. We compared the effectiveness of Your Path to Transplant (YPT), an individually tailored coaching and education program delivered at 4 time points, with standard of care (SOC) education on improving readiness to pursue DDKT and LDKT, transplant knowledge, taking 15 small transplant-related actions, and pursuing transplant (waitlisting or LDKT rates) over 8 months. Survey outcomes were collected prior to evaluation and at 4 and 8 months. Time to waitlisting or LDKT was assessed with at least 18 months of follow-up. At 8 months, compared to SOC, the YPT group demonstrated increased LDKT readiness (47% vs 33%, P = .003) and transplant knowledge (effect size [ES] = 0.41, P < .001). Transplant pursuit was higher in the YPT group (hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.79, P = .002). A focused, coordinated education effort can improve transplant-seeking behaviors and waitlisting rates. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02181114.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D. Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,Terasaki Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, California
| | - John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Yujie Cui
- Terasaki Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Andrea Paiva
- Department of Psychology, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI
| | - Amanda F. Lipsey
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California,Terasaki Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Crystal S. Anderson
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mark L. Robbins
- Department of Psychology, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peipert JD, Lad T, Khosla PG, Garcia SF, Hahn EA. A Low Literacy, Multimedia Health Information Technology Intervention to Enhance Patient-Centered Cancer Care in Safety Net Settings Increased Cancer Knowledge in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211036783. [PMID: 34565193 PMCID: PMC8481731 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211036783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We tested whether a low-literacy-friendly, multimedia information and assessment system used in daily clinical practice enhanced patient-centered care and improved patient outcomes. This was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 2 arms, CancerHelp-Talking Touchscreen (CancerHelp-TT) versus control, among adults with Stage I-III breast or colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in safety net settings. Each patient was assessed for outcomes at 4 timepoints: after starting treatment (baseline), during treatment, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up assessment. The primary outcomes were health beliefs, cancer knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with communication about cancer and its treatments. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was a secondary outcome. A total of 129 patients participated in the study (65 intervention and 64 control), and approximately 50% of these completed the study. Patients randomized to receive the CancerHelp-TT program had a significantly larger increase in their cancer knowledge in comparison to those randomized to the control arm (effect size = .48, P = .05). While effect sizes for differences between randomized groups in self-efficacy, health beliefs, HRQOL, and satisfaction with communication were small (.10-.48), there was a consistent trend that participants in the intervention group showed larger increases over time in all outcomes compared to the control group. The CancerHelp-TT software was favorably rated by intervention participants. The CancerHelp-TT program showed promise to increase vulnerable cancer patients' cancer knowledge and adaptive health beliefs and attitudes. However, vulnerable patients may need additional interventional support in settings outside cancer clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas Lad
- John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Hahn
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peipert JD, Jennings LA, Romero T, Hays RD, Wenger NS, Keeler E, Reuben DB. Validation of a Brief Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Dementia Severity. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 69:512-516. [PMID: 33258124 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Briefer measures of symptoms and functional limitations may reduce assessment burden and facilitate monitoring populations of persons with dementia (PWD). DESIGN Prospective follow-up study. SETTING University-based dementia care management program. PARTICIPANTS 1,091 PWD. MEASUREMENTS We assessed cognition (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)-11 tasks), neuropsychiatric symptom severity (Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire Severity Scale (NPIQ-S)-12 items), and functional ability (Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-6 items; Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ)-10 items). Item response theory was used to select subsets of items by identifying low item discrimination (<1.50), poor item fit (χ2 ), local dependence (LD), and with difficulty similar to other items. We estimated correlations between original and shorter scales and compared their associations with mortality. We added two symptoms (trouble swallowing, coughing when eating) reflecting late-stage dementia complications, created a multi-dimensional dementia assessment composite, and examined its association with mortality. RESULTS Five MMSE tasks were eliminated: two with low discrimination, two with difficulty similar to other items, and one with poor fit. The remaining tasks were correlated with the full MMSE at r = 0.82. We retained three ADLs that were correlated with the total ADL set at r = 0.95 and kept five FAQ items that were not LD (correlation with full FAQ, r = 0.97). Associations with mortality were similar between the longer and shorter scales. A higher score on the composite (range 0-100) indicates worse dementia impact and was associated with mortality (hazard ratio (HR) per scale point: 1.03 (1.02-1.04)). CONCLUSION These brief assessments and dementia composite may reduce administration time while preserving validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lee A Jennings
- Reynolds Section of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Tahmineh Romero
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Neil S Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Emmett Keeler
- Department of Medicine, RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - David B Reuben
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lentine KL, Peipert JD, Alhamad T, Caliskan Y, Concepcion BP, Forbes R, Schnitzler M, Chang SH, Cooper M, Bloom RD, Mannon RB, Axelrod DA. Survey of Clinician Opinions on Kidney Transplantation from Hepatitis C Virus Positive Donors: Identifying and Overcoming Barriers. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 1:1291-1299. [PMID: 33251523 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0004592020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Transplant practices related to use of organs from Hepatitis C virus infected donors (DHCV+) is evolving rapidly. Methods We surveyed U.S. kidney transplant programs by email and professional society listserv postings between 7/19-1/20 to assess attitudes, management strategies, and barriers related to use of viremic (nucleic acid testing (NAT)+) donor organs in HCV uninfected recipients. Results Staff at 112 unique programs responded, representing 54% of U.S. adult kidney transplant programs and 69% of adult deceased donor kidney transplant volume in 2019. Most survey respondents were transplant nephrologists (46%) or surgeons (43%). Among responding programs, 67% currently transplant DHCV antibody+/NAT- organs under a clinical protocol or as standard of care. By comparison, only 58% offer DHCV NAT+ kidney transplant to HCV- recipients, including 35% under clinical protocols, 14% as standard of care, and 9% under research protocols. Following transplant of DHCV NAT+ organs to uninfected recipients, 53% start direct acting antiviral agent (DAA) therapy after discharge and documented viremia. Viral monitoring protocols after DHCV NAT+ to HCV uninfected recipient kidney transplantation varied substantially. 56% of programs performing these transplants report having an institutional plan to provide DAA treatment if declined by the recipient's insurance. Respondents felt a mean decrease in waiting time of ≥18 months (range 0-60) justifies the practice. Program concerns related to use of DHCV NAT+ kidneys include insurance coverage concerns (72%), cost (60%), and perceived risk of transmitting resistant infection (44%). Conclusions Addressing knowledge about safety and logistical/financial barriers related to use of DHCV NAT+ kidney transplantation for HCV uninfected recipients may help reduced discards and expand the organ supply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, MO
| | - John D Peipert
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Core, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Yasar Caliskan
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | - Mark Schnitzler
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | - Roy D Bloom
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Waterman AD, Gleason J, Lerminiaux L, Wood EH, Berrios A, Meacham LA, Osuji A, Pines R, Peipert JD. Amplifying the Patient Voice: Key Priorities and Opportunities for Improved Transplant and Living Donor Advocacy and Outcomes During COVID-19 and Beyond. Curr Transplant Rep 2020; 7:301-310. [PMID: 32904875 PMCID: PMC7462355 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-020-00295-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review To define patient advocacy and engagement for modern transplant and living donation care, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, describe the patient experience when transplant advocacy and engagement are optimized, and recommend opportunities for advocacy within three key areas: (1) including the patient voice in healthcare decisions and drug development, (2) access to the best evidence-based treatments and informed decision-making, and (3) present and future care innovations and policies. Recent Findings There are many avenues for transplant and living donation advocacy and engagement at the patient, provider, family, system, community, and policy levels. Key recommendations include the following: (1) simplifying education to be health literate, written at the appropriate reading level, culturally sensitive, and available in multiple languages and across many delivery platforms, (2) inviting transplant patients and donors to the conversation through advisory panels, consensus conferences, and new mediums like digital storytelling and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), (3) training all members of the health team to understand their role as advocates, and (4) advancing policies and programs that support the financial neutrality of living donation, and support recipients with the cost of immunosuppressive drugs. Key recommendations specific to the COVID-19 pandemic include providing up-to-date, health literate, concise information about preventing COVID-19 and accessing care including telehealth. Summary Enhancing advocacy and engagement for transplant patients and donors along the pre-to-post transplant/donation continuum can improve clinical outcomes and quality of life generally, and more so, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D. Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Jim Gleason
- Transplant Recipients International, Beverly, NJ USA
| | - Louise Lerminiaux
- Transplant Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Emily H. Wood
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Alexander Berrios
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Laurie A. Meacham
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Anne Osuji
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Rachyl Pines
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peipert JD, Caicedo JC, Friedewald JJ, Abecassis MMI, Cella D, Ladner DP, Butt Z. Trends and predictors of multidimensional health-related quality of life after living donor kidney transplantation. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:2355-2374. [PMID: 32285345 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02498-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) imparts the best graft and patient survival for most end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. Yet, there remains variation in post-LDKT health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Improved understanding of post-LDKT HRQOL can help identify patients for interventions to maximize the benefit of LDKT. METHODS For 477 LDKT recipients transplanted between 11/2007 and 08/2016, we assessed physical, mental, social, and kidney-targeted HRQOL pre-LDKT, as well as 3 and 12 months post-operatively using the SF-36, Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index 19 item version (FKSI-19). We then examined trajectories of each HRQOL domain using latent growth curve models (LGCMs). We also examined associations between decline in HRQOL from 3 months to 12 months post-LDKT and death censored graft failure (DCGF) using Cox regression. RESULTS Large magnitude effects (d > 0.80) were observed from pre- to post-LDKT change on the SF-36 Vitality scale (d = 0.81) and the KDQOL-SF Burden of Kidney Disease (d = 1.05). Older age and smaller pre- to post-LDKT decreases in serum creatinine were associated with smaller improvements on many HRQOL scales across all domains in LGCMs. Higher DCGF rates were associated with worse physical [e.g., SF-36 PCSoblique hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.38], mental (KDQOL-SF Cognitive Function HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62), and kidney-targeted (FKSI-19 HR: 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.38) HRQOL domains. CONCLUSION Clinical HRQOL monitoring may help identify patients who are most likely to have failing grafts and who would benefit from post-LDKT intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. .,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Juan Carlos Caicedo
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John J Friedewald
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael M I Abecassis
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniela P Ladner
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zeeshan Butt
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hays RD, Peipert JD, Kallich JD. Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in "use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States". BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:447. [PMID: 31795976 PMCID: PMC6892228 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A recent article in the journal reported analyses of KDQOL-36™ survey data collected from 240,343 adults (330,412 surveys) dialyzed at a large dialysis organization in the United States during 2014-2016. The authors concluded that the KDQOL-36™ Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease scale had the highest mean score of the KDQOL-36™ scales. We note that this inference was erroneous because the scales are not scored on the same numeric scale. In addition, the authors found that responses to a general health perceptions item ("In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor") was not significantly associated with any of the 5 KDQOL-36 scale scores. In contrast, we find significant and noteworthy correlations in two other datasets. These analytic issues call into question the accuracy and validity of the conclusions of this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron D. Hays
- UCLA Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
| | - John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Ave, 27th floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Joel D. Kallich
- Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, 179 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim M, Liotta EM, Zee PC, Ganger DR, Ladner DP, Karmarkar A, Peipert JD, Sorond FA, Prabhakaran S, Reid KJ, Naidech AM, Maas MB. Impaired cognition predicts the risk of hospitalization and death in cirrhosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6:2282-2290. [PMID: 31631586 PMCID: PMC6856598 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.50924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Cognitive impairment, detected in up to 80% of patients with liver cirrhosis, is associated with negative health outcomes but is underdiagnosed in the clinical setting due to the lack of practical testing method. This single‐center prospective observational study aimed to test the feasibility and prognostic utility of in‐clinic cognitive assessment of patients with liver cirrhosis using the NIH Toolbox cognition battery (NIHTB). Methods Patients recruited from a hepatology/transplant clinic underwent cognitive assessments using West‐Haven Grade (WHG) and NIHTB between November 2016 and August 2018 and were prospectively followed until December 2018. The primary outcome was a composite end point of hospitalization related to overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and all‐cause mortality during follow‐up, evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards regression model that adjusted for a priori covariates (age and MELD‐Na). Results Among 127 patients (median age 60 years, 48 [38%] women) assessed, cognitive performance was significantly impaired in 82 [78%] patients with WHG 0 and 22 [100%] patients with WHG 1 and 2. Over a median of 347 days follow‐up, 18 OHE and 8 deaths were observed. Lower cognitive performance was associated with an increased risk of OHE/death adjusting for age and MELD‐Na. Subclinical cognitive impairment detected by NIH Toolbox in WHG 0 patients was significantly associated with greater mortality. Median time to complete the two prognostically informative NIH Toolbox tests was 9.4 min. Interpretation NIH Toolbox may enable a rapid cognitive screening in the outpatient setting and identify patients at high risk for death and hospitalization for severe encephalopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjee Kim
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric M Liotta
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Phyllis C Zee
- Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel R Ganger
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniela P Ladner
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ameeta Karmarkar
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John D Peipert
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Farzaneh A Sorond
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Kathryn J Reid
- Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew M Naidech
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew B Maas
- Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peipert JD, Cella D. Bifactor analysis confirmation of the factorial structure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT‐G). Psychooncology 2019; 28:1149-1152. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social SciencesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social SciencesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim M, Maas MB, Reid KJ, Peipert JD, Liotta EM, Ladner DP, Zee PC. 0831 Sleep, Circadian, and Cognitive Dysfunction in Cirrhotic Patients Waitlisted for Liver Transplant. Sleep 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsz067.829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Minjee Kim
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Peipert JD, Nair D, Klicko K, Schatell DR, Hays RD. Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short Form Survey (KDQOL-36) Normative Values for the United States Dialysis Population and New Single Summary Score. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:654-663. [PMID: 30898868 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018100994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) is a widely used, patient-reported outcome measure for patients on dialysis. Efforts to aid interpretation are needed. METHODS We used a sample of 58,851 dialysis patients participating in the Medical Education Institute (MEI) KDQOL Complete program, and 443,947 patients from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) to develop the KDQOL-36 Summary Score (KSS) for the kidney-targeted KDQOL-36 scales (Burdens of Kidney Disease [BKD], Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease [SPKD], and Effects of Kidney Disease [EKD]). We also used the MEI and USRDS data to calculate normative values for the Short Form-12 Health Survey's Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and the KDQOL-36's BKD, SPKD, and EKD scales for the United States dialysis population. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models for KDQOL-36 kidney-targeted items, evaluated model fit with the comparative fit index (CFI; >0.95 indicates good fit) and root-mean-squared error of approximation (RMSEA; <0.06 indicates good fit), and estimated norms by matching the joint distribution of patient characteristics in the MEI sample to those of the USRDS sample. RESULTS A bifactor CFA model fit the data well (RMSEA=0.046, CFI=0.990), supporting the KSS (α=0.91). Mean dialysis normative scores were PCS=37.8 and MCS=50.9 (scored on a T-score metric); and KSS=73.0, BKD=52.8, SPKD=79.0, and EKD=74.1 (0-100 possible scores). CONCLUSIONS The KSS is a reliable summary of the KDQOL-36. The United States KDQOL-36 normative facilitate interpretation and incorporation of patient-related outcome measures into kidney disease care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and .,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Devika Nair
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kristi Klicko
- Medical Education Institute, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin; and
| | | | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; .,Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Waterman AD, Anderson C, Alem A, Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Henry SL, Dub B, Ambriz L, Bijjala N, Lipsey AF, Mittman B. A randomized controlled trial of Explore Transplant at Home to improve transplant knowledge and decision-making for CKD 3-5 patients at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:78. [PMID: 30832619 PMCID: PMC6399838 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1262-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Five-year survival on dialysis is only 40%, compared to 74% with a deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) and 87% with a living donor kidney transplant (LDKT). An American Society of Transplantation (AST) Consensus Conference recommended that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 3–5 have the opportunity to learn about and decide which treatment option is right for them, particularly about LDKT. However, early education about LDKT and DDKT outside of transplant centers is inconsistent and often poor, with patients in CKD 3 and 4 and ethnic/racial minorities even less likely to receive it. A new randomized control trial (RCT), in partnership with Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), will assess knowledge gaps and the effectiveness of a supplementary video-guided, print and technology-based education intervention for English- and Spanish-speaking patients in CKD Stages 3, 4, and 5 to increase LDKT knowledge and decision-making. To date, no published LDKT educational interventions have studied such a large and diverse CKD population. Methods In this RCT, 1200 English and Spanish-speaking CKD Stage 3–5 patients will be randomly assigned to one of two education conditions: ET@Home or KPSC standard of care education. Randomization will be stratified by CKD stage and primary language spoken. Those in the ET@Home condition will receive brochures, postcards, DVDs, and text messages delivering educational content in modules over a six-month period. Baseline data collection will measure demographics, transplant derailers, and the amount of previous CKD and transplant education they have received. Changes in CKD and transplant knowledge, ability to make an informed decision about transplant, and self-efficacy to pursue LDKT will be captured with surveys administered at baseline and at six months. Discussion At the conclusion of the study, investigators will understand key knowledge gaps for patients along the CKD continuum and between patients who speak different languages and have assessed the effectiveness of both English- and Spanish-language supplementary education in increasing KPSC patients’ knowledge about the opportunities for and risks and benefits of LDKT. We hope this program will reduce disparities in access to transplant. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03389932; date registered: 12/26/2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. .,Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
| | - Crystal Anderson
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Angelika Alem
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| | - John D Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Jennifer L Beaumont
- Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Shayna L Henry
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| | - Bhanuja Dub
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| | - Lizeth Ambriz
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Neha Bijjala
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Amanda Faye Lipsey
- Terasaki Research Institute, Terasaki Research Institute, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Brian Mittman
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Flechner SM, Thomas AG, Ronin M, Veale JL, Leeser DB, Kapur S, Peipert JD, Segev D, Henderson ML, Shaffer AA, Cooper M, Hil G, Waterman AD. The first 9 years of kidney paired donation through the National Kidney Registry: Characteristics of donors and recipients compared with National Live Donor Transplant Registries. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2730-2738. [PMID: 29603640 PMCID: PMC6165704 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The practice of kidney paired donation (KPD) is expanding annually, offering the opportunity for live donor kidney transplant to more patients. We sought to identify if voluntary KPD networks such as the National Kidney Registry (NKR) were selecting or attracting a narrower group of donors or recipients compared with national registries. For this purpose, we merged data from the NKR database with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database, from February 14, 2008, to February 14, 2017, encompassing the first 9 years of the NKR. Compared with all United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) live donor transplant patients (49 610), all UNOS living unrelated transplant patients (23 319), and all other KPD transplant patients (4236), the demographic and clinical characteristics of NKR transplant patients (2037) appear similar to contemporary national trends. In particular, among the NKR patients, there were a significantly (P < .001) greater number of retransplants (25.6% vs 11.5%), hyperimmunized recipients (22.7% vs 4.3% were cPRA >80%), female recipients (45.9% vs 37.6%), black recipients (18.2% vs 13%), and those on public insurance (49.7% vs 41.8%) compared with controls. These results support the need for greater sharing and larger pool sizes, perhaps enhanced by the entry of compatible pairs and even chains initiated by deceased donors, to unlock more opportunities for those harder-to-match pairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | - Garet Hil
- National Kidney Registry, Babylon, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schalet BD, Peipert JD. POST-ACUTE CARE CROSS-SETTING ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.1672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B D Schalet
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - J D Peipert
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peipert JD, Jennings LA, Hays RD, Wenger NS, Keeler E, Reuben DB. A Composite Measure of Caregiver Burden in Dementia: The Dementia Burden Scale-Caregiver. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:1785-1789. [PMID: 30094817 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To better capture the scope of caregiver burden by creating a composite of 3 existing measures that assess different health domains. DESIGN Prospective follow-up study. SETTING University-based dementia care management program. PARTICIPANTS Caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) (N=1,091). MEASUREMENTS The composite measure (the Dementia Burden Scale-Caregiver (DBS-CG)) was based on the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire Distress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Alternative factor structures were evaluated using 2 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models: a bifactor model and a 3 correlated factors model. Good model fit was defined as a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of less than 0.06 and comparative fit index (CFI) value greater than 0.95. Coefficient omega was used to estimate scale reliability. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated by anchoring the magnitude of DBS-CG change to change in caregiver self-efficacy and functional ability of PWD. RESULTS The bifactor CFA model fit best (RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.95). Based on this model, a DBS-CG scale was created wherein all items were transformed to a possible range of 0 to 100 and then averaged. Higher scores indicate higher burden. Mean DBS-CG score was 27.3. The reliability was excellent (coefficient omega=0.93). MID estimates ranged from 4 to 5 points (effect sizes: 0.20-0.49). CONCLUSION This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the DBS-CG. It can be used as an outcome measure to assess the effect of interventions to reduce dementia caregiver burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lee A Jennings
- Reynolds Department of Geriatric Medicine, Health Sciences Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Neil S Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - David B Reuben
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Peipert JD, Bentler P, Klicko K, Hays RD. Negligible impact of differential item functioning between Black and White dialysis patients on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL TM-36). Qual Life Res 2018; 27:2699-2707. [PMID: 29761347 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1879-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Black dialysis patients report better health-related quality of life (HRQOL) than White patients, which may be explained if Black and White patients respond systematically differently to HRQOL survey items. METHODS We examined differential item functioning (DIF) of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item (KDQOLTM-36) Burden of Kidney Disease, Symptoms and Problems with Kidney Disease, and Effects of Kidney Disease scales between Black (n = 18,404) and White (n = 21,439) dialysis patients. We fit multiple group confirmatory factor analysis models with increasing invariance: a Configural model (invariant factor structure), a Metric model (invariant factor loadings), and a Scalar model (invariant intercepts). Criteria for invariance included non-significant χ2 tests, > 0.002 difference in the models' CFI, and > 0.015 difference in RMSEA and SRMR. Next, starting with a fully invariant model, we freed loadings and intercepts item-by-item to determine if DIF impacted estimated KDQOLTM-36 scale means. RESULTS ΔCFI was 0.006 between the metric and scalar models but was reduced to 0.001 when we freed intercepts for the burdens and symptoms and problems of kidney disease scales. In comparison to standardized means of 0 in the White group, those for the Black group on the Burdens, Symptoms and Problems, and Effects of Kidney Disease scales were 0.218, 0.061, and 0.161, respectively. When loadings and thresholds were released sequentially, differences in means between models ranged between 0.001 and 0.048. CONCLUSION Despite some DIF, impacts on KDQOLTM-36 responses appear to be minimal. We conclude that the KDQOLTM-36 is appropriate to make substantive comparisons of HRQOL between Black and White dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Terasaki Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Peter Bentler
- Departments of Psychology and Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Treat E, Chow EKH, Peipert JD, Waterman A, Kwan L, Massie AB, Thomas AG, Bowring MG, Leeser D, Flechner S, Melcher ML, Kapur S, Segev DL, Veale J. Shipping living donor kidneys and transplant recipient outcomes. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:632-641. [PMID: 29165871 PMCID: PMC6354257 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Kidney paired donation (KPD) is an important tool to facilitate living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Concerns remain over prolonged cold ischemia times (CIT) associated with shipping kidneys long distances through KPD. We examined the association between CIT and delayed graft function (DGF), allograft survival, and patient survival for 1267 shipped and 205 nonshipped/internal KPD LDKTs facilitated by the National Kidney Registry in the United States from 2008 to 2015, compared to 4800 unrelated, nonshipped, non-KPD LDKTs. Shipped KPD recipients had a median CIT of 9.3 hours (range = 0.25-23.9 hours), compared to 1.0 hour for internal KPD transplants and 0.93 hours for non-KPD LDKTs. Each hour of CIT was associated with a 5% increased odds of DGF (adjusted odds ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.09, P < .01). However, there was not a significant association between CIT and all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.04, P = .4), death-censored graft failure ( [aHR]: 1.02, 95% CI, 0.98-1.06, P = .4), or mortality (aHR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.96-1.04, P > .9). This study of KPD-facilitated LDKTs found no evidence that long CIT is a concern for reduced graft or patient survival. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to refine our understanding of the safety of shipping donor kidneys through KPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Treat
- Abdominal Organ Transplant Program, Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital, San Antonio, TX USA
| | - Eric KH Chow
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Epidemiology Research Group in Organ Transplantation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John D Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, Transplant Research and Education Center (TREC), Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA, Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amy Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, Transplant Research and Education Center (TREC), Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA, Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lorna Kwan
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Epidemiology Research Group in Organ Transplantation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alvin G. Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Epidemiology Research Group in Organ Transplantation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Grace Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Epidemiology Research Group in Organ Transplantation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Leeser
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Marc L Melcher
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sandip Kapur
- Department of Urology, New-York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Epidemiology Research Group in Organ Transplantation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey Veale
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Weng FL, Peipert JD, Holland BK, Brown DR, Waterman AD. A Clustered Randomized Trial of an Educational Intervention During Transplant Evaluation to Increase Knowledge of Living Donor Kidney Transplant. Prog Transplant 2017; 27:377-385. [PMID: 29187135 DOI: 10.1177/1526924817732021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maximizing education about living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) during the in-person evaluation at the transplant center may increase the numbers of kidney patients pursuing LDKT. Research Questions and Design: To test the effectiveness of a 1-time LDKT educational intervention, we performed a cluster-randomized trial among 499 patients who presented for evaluation of kidney transplant. We compared usual care education (n = 250) versus intensive LDKT education (n = 249), which was implemented only on the evaluation day and consisted of viewing a 25-minute video of information and stories about LDKT and discussion of LDKT possibilities with an educator. Our primary outcome was knowledge of LDKT, 1 week after the transplant evaluation. RESULTS One week after evaluation, patients who received intensive education had higher knowledge than patients who received usual care (12.7 vs. 11.7; P = .0008), but there were no differences in postevaluation readiness for LDKT. Among patients who had not previously identified a potential living donor, receiving intensive education was associated with increased willingness to take steps toward LDKT. DISCUSSION In conclusion, expansion of LDKT education within the evaluation day may be helpful, but interventions that are implemented at multiple times and for greater duration may be necessary to ensure larger and long-term behavioral changes in pursuit of LDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- 1 Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.,2 Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - John D Peipert
- 3 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Diane R Brown
- 2 Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Amy D Waterman
- 3 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
McSorley AMM, Peipert JD, Gonzalez C, Norris KC, Goalby CJ, Peace LJ, Waterman AD. Dialysis Providers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Transplant for Black and Low-Income Patients: A Mixed Methods Analysis Guided by the Socio-Ecological Model for Transplant. World Medical & Health Policy 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
29
|
Peipert JD, Bentler PM, Klicko K, Hays RD. Psychometric Properties of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short-Form Survey (KDQOL-36) in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 71:461-468. [PMID: 29128411 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services require that dialysis patients' health-related quality of life be assessed annually. The primary instrument used for this purpose is the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short-Form Survey (KDQOL-36), which includes the SF-12 as its generic core and 3 kidney disease-targeted scales: Burden of Kidney Disease, Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease, and Effects of Kidney Disease. Despite its broad use, there has been limited evaluation of KDQOL-36's psychometric properties. STUDY DESIGN Secondary analyses of data collected by the Medical Education Institute to evaluate the reliability and factor structure of the KDQOL-36 scales. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS KDQOL-36 responses from 70,786 dialysis patients in 1,381 US dialysis facilities that permitted data analysis were collected from June 1, 2015, through May 31, 2016, as part of routine clinical assessment. MEASUREMENTS & OUTCOMES We assessed the KDQOL-36 scales' internal consistency reliability and dialysis facility-level reliability using coefficient alpha and 1-way analysis of variance. We evaluated the KDQOL-36's factor structure using item-to-total scale correlations and confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was examined using correlations between SF-12 and KDQOL-36 scales and "known groups" analyses. RESULTS Each of the KDQOL-36's kidney disease-targeted scales had acceptable internal consistency reliability (α=0.83-0.85) and facility-level reliability (r=0.75-0.83). Item-scale correlations and a confirmatory factor analysis model evidenced the KDQOL-36's original factor structure. Construct validity was supported by large correlations between the SF-12 Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary (r=0.40-0.52) and the KDQOL-36 scale scores, as well as significant differences on the scale scores between patients receiving different types of dialysis, diabetic and nondiabetic patients, and patients who were employed full-time versus not. LIMITATIONS Use of secondary data from a clinical registry. CONCLUSIONS The study provides support for the reliability and construct validity of the KDQOL-36 scales for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Peter M Bentler
- Departments of Psychology and Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ron D. Hays
- General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peipert JD, Hays RD. Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2017; 1:11. [PMID: 29757314 PMCID: PMC5934925 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-017-0010-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient reported measures (PRMs), including patient-reported outcomes, play a critical role in dialysis care. The usage of PRMs is extensive in dialysis clinics. While there are excellent PRMs to choose from, and their implementation as part of quality improvement and performance monitoring is extensive, there are still methodological challenges to be addressed. In this paper, we identify key methodological concerns around use of PRMs in dialysis centers in the United States and make recommendations for improving the use of PRMs in dialysis related to Selection of PRMs, Mode of Administration, and Support for PRM Use. These recommendations include: (1) Continue the use of Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item survey (KDQOL™-36) for dialysis centers' internal quality improvement activities and the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS survey®) for public dialysis center performance monitoring, but promote efforts to modify these instruments by incorporating PROMIS general health items (KDQOL-36) and reducing the length of the ICH-CAHPS. (2) Adopt a PRM of whether dialysis patients have been informed about all dialysis and transplant options. (3) Evaluate equivalence between electronic and paper versions of PRMs prior to widespread use of electronic administration. (4) Explore reimbursement of costs of PRM administration by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and kidney organizations. (5) Continue development of provider trainings in PRM administration and interpretation. These recommendations will help dialysis care decision-makers, clinicians, and applied researchers take the next steps toward enhancing PRM use in dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 1018 Westwood Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
- Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Ron D. Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Axelrod DA, Kynard-Amerson CS, Wojciechowski D, Jacobs M, Lentine KL, Schnitzler M, Peipert JD, Waterman AD. Cultural competency of a mobile, customized patient education tool for improving potential kidney transplant recipients’ knowledge and decision-making. Clin Transplant 2017; 31. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Axelrod
- Brody School of Medicine; East Carolina University; Greenville NC USA
- XynManagement Inc; Boerne TX USA
| | | | | | - Marie Jacobs
- Department of Medicine; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston MA USA
| | - Krista L. Lentine
- XynManagement Inc; Boerne TX USA
- Abdominal Transplant Center; St. Louis University; St. Louis MO USA
| | - Mark Schnitzler
- XynManagement Inc; Boerne TX USA
- Abdominal Transplant Center; St. Louis University; St. Louis MO USA
| | - John D. Peipert
- David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California at Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA USA
| | - Amy D. Waterman
- David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California at Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Talamantes E, Norris KC, Mangione CM, Moreno G, Waterman AD, Peipert JD, Bunnapradist S, Huang E. Linguistic Isolation and Access to the Active Kidney Transplant Waiting List in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12:483-492. [PMID: 28183854 PMCID: PMC5338711 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.07150716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Waitlist inactivity is a barrier to transplantation, because inactive candidates cannot receive deceased donor organ offers. We hypothesized that temporarily inactive kidney transplant candidates living in linguistically isolated communities would be less likely to achieve active waitlist status. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We merged Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data with five-digit zip code socioeconomic data from the 2000 US Census. The cumulative incidence of conversion to active waitlist status, death, and delisting before conversion among 84,783 temporarily inactive adult kidney candidates from 2004 to 2012 was determined using competing risks methods. Competing risks regression was performed to characterize the association between linguistic isolation, incomplete transplantation evaluation, and conversion to active status. A household was determined to be linguistically isolated if all members ≥14 years old speak a non-English language and also, speak English less than very well. RESULTS A total of 59,147 candidates (70% of the study population) achieved active status over the study period of 9.8 years. Median follow-up was 110 days (interquartile range, 42-276 days) for activated patients and 815 days (interquartile range, 361-1244 days) for candidates not activated. The cumulative incidence of activation over the study period was 74%, the cumulative incidence of death before conversion was 10%, and the cumulative incidence of delisting was 13%. After adjusting for other relevant covariates, living in a zip code with higher percentages of linguistically isolated households was associated with progressively lower subhazards of activation both in the overall population (reference: <1% linguistically isolated households; 1%-4.9% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.93; 5%-9.9% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.87; 10%-19.9% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.80; and ≥20% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.76) and among candidates designated temporarily inactive due to an incomplete transplant evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that candidates residing in linguistically isolated communities are less likely to complete candidate evaluations and achieve active waitlist status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrain Talamantes
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
| | - Keith C. Norris
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services, Department of Medicine, and
| | - Carol M. Mangione
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services, Department of Medicine, and
| | | | - Amy D. Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine
- Kidney Transplant Research Program, Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - John D. Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine
- Kidney Transplant Research Program, Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine
- Kidney Transplant Research Program, Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Edmund Huang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine
- Kidney Transplant Research Program, Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Waterman AD, Robbins ML, Peipert JD. Educating Prospective Kidney Transplant Recipients and Living Donors about Living Donation: Practical and Theoretical Recommendations for Increasing Living Donation Rates. Curr Transplant Rep 2016; 3:1-9. [PMID: 27347475 PMCID: PMC4918088 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-016-0090-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A promising strategy for increasing living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) rates is improving education about living donation for both prospective kidney transplant recipients and living donors to help overcome the proven knowledge, psychological, and socioeconomic barriers to LDKT. A recent Consensus Conference on Best Practices in Live Kidney Donation recommended that comprehensive LDKT education be made available to patients at all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, in considering how to implement this recommendation across different healthcare learning environments, the current lack of available guidance regarding how to design, deliver, and measure the efficacy of LDKT education programs is notable. In the current article, we provide an overview of how one behavior change theory, the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, can guide the delivery of LDKT education for patients at various stages of CKD and readiness for LDKT. We also discuss the importance of creating educational programs for both potential kidney transplant recipients and living donors, and identify key priorities for educational research to reduce racial disparities in LDKT and increase LDKT rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D. Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | | | - John D. Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Waterman AD, McSorley AMM, Peipert JD, Goalby CJ, Peace LJ, Lutz PA, Thein JL. Explore Transplant at Home: a randomized control trial of an educational intervention to increase transplant knowledge for Black and White socioeconomically disadvantaged dialysis patients. BMC Nephrol 2015; 16:150. [PMID: 26316264 PMCID: PMC4552175 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-015-0143-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to others, dialysis patients who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or Black are less likely to receive education about deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) and living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) before they reach transplant centers, often due to limited availability of transplant education within dialysis centers. Since these patients are often less knowledgeable or ready to pursue transplant, educational content must be simplified, made culturally sensitive, and presented gradually across multiple sessions to increase learning and honor where they are in their decision-making about transplant. The Explore Transplant at Home (ETH) program was developed to help patients learn more about DDKT and LDKT at home, with and without telephone conversations with an educator. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), 540 low-income Black and White dialysis patients with household incomes at or below 250 % of the federal poverty line, some of whom receive financial assistance from the Missouri Kidney Program, will be randomly assigned to one of three education conditions: (1) standard-of-care transplant education provided by the dialysis center, (2) patient-guided ETH (ETH-PG), and (3) health educator-guided ETH (ETH-EG). Patients in the standard-of-care condition will only receive education provided in their dialysis centers. Those in the two ETH conditions will receive four video and print modules delivered over an 8 month period by mail, with the option of receiving supplementary text messages weekly. In addition, patients in the ETH-EG condition will participate in multiple telephonic educational sessions with a health educator. Changes in transplant knowledge, decisional balance, self-efficacy, and informed decision making will be captured with surveys administered before and after the ETH education. DISCUSSION At the conclusion of this RCT, we will have determined whether an education program administered to socioeconomically disadvantaged dialysis patients, over several months directly in their homes, can help more individuals learn about the options of DDKT and LDKT. We also will be able to examine the efficacy of different educational delivery approaches to further understand whether the addition of a telephone educator is necessary for increasing transplant knowledge. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02268682.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8005, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Anna-Michelle M McSorley
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
| | - John D Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8005, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Christina J Goalby
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8005, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Leanne J Peace
- Missouri Kidney Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, AP Green Building, Suite 111, 201 Business Loop-70 W, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
| | - Patricia A Lutz
- Missouri Kidney Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, AP Green Building, Suite 111, 201 Business Loop-70 W, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
| | - Jessica L Thein
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8005, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Waterman AD, Peipert JD, Goalby CJ, Dinkel KM, Xiao H, Lentine KL. Assessing Transplant Education Practices in Dialysis Centers: Comparing Educator Reported and Medicare Data. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 10:1617-25. [PMID: 26292696 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.09851014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires that dialysis centers inform new patients of their transplant options and document compliance using the CMS-2728 Medical Evidence Form (Form-2728). This study compared reports of transplant education for new dialysis patients reported to CMS with descriptions from transplant educators (predominantly dialysis nurses and social workers) of their centers' quantity of and specific educational practices. The goal was to determine what specific transplant education occurred and whether provision of transplant education was associated with center-level variation in transplant wait-listing rates. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Form-2728 data were drawn for 1558 incident dialysis patients at 170 centers in the Heartland Kidney Network (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska) in 2009-2011; educators at these centers completed a survey describing their transplant educational practices. Educators' own survey responses were compared with Form-2728 reports for patients at each corresponding center. The association of quantity of transplant education practices used with wait-listing rates across dialysis centers was examined using multivariable negative binomial regression. RESULTS According to Form-2728, 77% of patients (n=1203) were informed of their transplant options within 45 days. Educators, who reported low levels of transplant knowledge themselves (six of 12 questions answered correctly), most commonly reported giving oral recommendations to begin transplant evaluation (988 informed patients educated, 81% of centers) and referrals to external transplant education programs (959 informed patients educated, 81% of centers). Only 18% reported having detailed discussions about transplant with their patients. Compared with others, centers that used more than three educational activities (incident rate ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.73) had higher transplant wait-listing rates. CONCLUSIONS While most educators inform new patients that transplant is an option, dialysis centers with higher wait-listing rates use multiple transplant education strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
| | - John D Peipert
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Christina J Goalby
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Huiling Xiao
- Center for Outcomes Research and Abdominal Transplantation Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Outcomes Research and Abdominal Transplantation Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Brick LA, Sorensen D, Robbins ML, Paiva AL, Peipert JD, Waterman AD. Invariance of measures to understand decision-making for pursuing living donor kidney transplant. J Health Psychol 2015; 21:2912-2922. [PMID: 26113527 DOI: 10.1177/1359105315589390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Living donor kidney transplant is the ideal treatment option for end-stage renal disease; however, the decision to pursue living donor kidney transplant is complex and challenging. Measurement invariance of living donor kidney transplant Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy across gender (male/female), race (Black/White), and education level (no college/college or higher) were examined using a sequential approach. Full strict invariance was found for Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy for gender and partial strict invariance was found for Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy across race and education level. This information will inform tailored feedback based on these constructs in future intervention studies targeting behavior change among specific demographic subgroups.
Collapse
|
38
|
Skelton SL, Waterman AD, Davis LA, Peipert JD, Fish AF. Applying best practices to designing patient education for patients with end-stage renal disease pursuing kidney transplant. Prog Transplant 2015; 25:77-84. [PMID: 25758805 PMCID: PMC4489708 DOI: 10.7182/pit2015415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite the known benefits of kidney transplant, less than 30% of the 615 000 patients living with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States have received a transplant. More than 100 000 people are presently on the transplant waiting list. Although the shortage of kidneys for transplant remains a critical factor in explaining lower transplant rates, another important and modifiable factor is patients' lack of comprehensive education about transplant. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of known best practices from the broader literature that can be used as an evidence base to design improved education for ESRD patients pursuing a kidney transplant. Best practices in chronic disease education generally reveal that education that is individually tailored, understandable for patients with low health literacy, and culturally competent is most beneficial. Effective education helps patients navigate the complex health care process successfully. Recommendations for how to incorporate these best practices into transplant education design are described. Providing more ESRD patients with transplant education that encompasses these best practices may improve their ability to make informed health care decisions and increase the numbers of patients interested in pursuing transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy D Waterman
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles, California
| | | | - John D Peipert
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Waterman AD, Robbins ML, Paiva AL, Peipert JD, Kynard-Amerson CS, Goalby CJ, Davis LA, Thein JL, Schenk EA, Baldwin KA, Skelton SL, Amoyal NR, Brick LA. Your Path to Transplant: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored computer education intervention to increase living donor kidney transplant. BMC Nephrol 2014; 15:166. [PMID: 25315644 PMCID: PMC4213461 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the deceased donor organ shortage, more kidney patients are considering whether to receive kidneys from family and friends, a process called living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Although Blacks and Hispanics are 3.4 and 1.5 times more likely, respectively, to develop end stage renal disease (ESRD) than Whites, they are less likely to receive LDKTs. To address this disparity, a new randomized controlled trial (RCT) will assess whether Black, Hispanic, and White transplant patients' knowledge, readiness to pursue LDKT, and receipt of LDKTs can be increased when they participate in the Your Path to Transplant (YPT) computer-tailored intervention. METHODS/DESIGN Nine hundred Black, Hispanic, and White ESRD patients presenting for transplant evaluation at University of California, Los Angeles Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program (UCLA-KPTP) will be randomly assigned to one of two education conditions, YPT or Usual Care Control Education (UC). As they undergo transplant evaluation, patients in the YPT condition will receive individually-tailored telephonic coaching sessions, feedback reports, video and print transplant education resources, and assistance with reducing any known socioeconomic barriers to LDKT. Patients receiving UC will only receive transplant education provided by UCLA-KPTP. Changes in transplant knowledge, readiness, pros and cons, and self-efficacy to pursue LDKT will be assessed prior to presenting at the transplant center (baseline), during transplant evaluation, and 4- and 8-months post-baseline, while completion of transplant evaluation and receipt of LDKTs will be assessed at 18-months post-baseline. The RCT will determine, compared to UC, whether Black, Hispanic, and White patients receiving YPT increase in their readiness to pursue LDKT and transplant knowledge, and become more likely to complete transplant medical evaluation and pursue LDKT. It will also examine how known patient, family, and healthcare system barriers to LDKT act alone and in combination with YPT to affect patients' transplant decision-making and behavior. Statistical analyses will be performed under an intent-to-treat approach. DISCUSSION At the conclusion of the study, we will have assessed the effectiveness of an innovative and cost-effective YPT intervention that could be utilized to tailor LDKT discussion and education based on the needs of individual patients of different races in many healthcare settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02181114.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1223, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Bode R, Cella D, Garcia SF, Hahn EA. Erratum to: Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures. Qual Life Res 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0633-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
41
|
Weng FL, Brown DR, Peipert JD, Holland B, Waterman AD. Protocol of a cluster randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase knowledge of living donor kidney transplant among potential transplant candidates. BMC Nephrol 2013; 14:256. [PMID: 24245948 PMCID: PMC3840671 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2013] [Accepted: 11/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The best treatment option for end-stage renal disease is usually a transplant, preferably a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT). The most effective ways to educate kidney transplant candidates about the risks, benefits, and process of LDKT remain unknown. Methods/design We report the protocol of the Enhancing Living Donor Kidney Transplant Education (ELITE) Study, a cluster randomized trial of an educational intervention to be implemented during initial transplant evaluation at a large, suburban U.S. transplant center. Five hundred potential transplant candidates are cluster randomized (by date of visit) to receive either: (1) standard-of-care (“usual”) transplant education, or (2) intensive education that is based upon the Explore Transplant series of educational materials. Intensive transplant education includes viewing an educational video about LDKT, receiving print education, and meeting with a transplant educator. The primary outcome consists of knowledge of the benefits, risks, and process of LDKT, assessed one week after the transplant evaluation. As a secondary outcome, knowledge and understanding of LDKT are assessed 3 months after the evaluation. Additional secondary outcomes, assessed one week and 3 months after the evaluation, include readiness, self-efficacy, and decisional balance regarding transplant and LDKT, with differences assessed by race. Although the unit of randomization is the date of the transplant evaluation visit, the unit of analysis will be the individual potential transplant candidate. Discussion The ELITE Study will help to determine how education in a transplant center can best be designed to help Black and non-Black patients learn about the option of LDKT. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT01261910
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Road, East Wing, Suite 305, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Waterman AD, Robbins ML, Paiva AL, Peipert JD, Davis LA, Hyland SS, Schenk EA, Baldwin KA, Amoyal NR. Measuring kidney patients' motivation to pursue living donor kidney transplant: development of stage of change, decisional balance and self-efficacy measures. J Health Psychol 2013; 20:210-21. [PMID: 24155194 DOI: 10.1177/1359105313501707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
While educational interventions to increase patient motivation to pursue living donor kidney transplant have shown success in increasing living donor kidney transplant rates, there are no validated, theoretically consistent measures of Stage of Change, a measure of readiness to pursue living donor kidney transplant; Decisional Balance, a weighted assessment of living donor kidney transplant's advantages/disadvantages; and Self-Efficacy, a measure of belief that patients can pursue living donor kidney transplant in difficult circumstances. This study developed and validated measures of these three constructs. In two independent samples of kidney patients (N 1 = 279 and N 2 = 204), results showed good psychometric properties and support for their use in the assessment of living donor kidney transplant interventions.
Collapse
|
43
|
Waterman AD, Peipert JD, Hyland SS, McCabe MS, Schenk EA, Liu J. Modifiable patient characteristics and racial disparities in evaluation completion and living donor transplant. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8:995-1002. [PMID: 23520044 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.08880812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To reduce racial disparities in transplant, modifiable patient characteristics associated with completion of transplant evaluation and receipt of living donor kidney transplant must be identified. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS From 2004 to 2007, 695 black and white patients were surveyed about 15 less-modifiable and 10 more-modifiable characteristics at evaluation onset; whether they had completed evaluation within 1 year and received living donor kidney transplants by 2010 was determined. Logistic regression and competing risks time-to-event analysis were conducted to determine the variables that predicted evaluation completion and living donor kidney transplant receipt. RESULTS Not adjusting for covariates, blacks were less likely than whites to complete evaluation (26.2% versus 51.8%, P<0.001) and receive living donor kidney transplants (8.7% versus 21.9%, P<0.001). More-modifiable variables associated with completing evaluation included more willing to be on the waiting list (odds ratio=3.4, 95% confidence interval=2.1, 5.7), more willing to pursue living donor kidney transplant (odds ratio=2.7, 95% confidence interval=1.8, 4.0), having access to more transplant education resources (odds ratio=2.2, 95% confidence interval=1.5, 3.2), and having greater transplant knowledge (odds ratio=1.8, 95% confidence interval=1.2, 2.7). Patients who started evaluation more willing to pursue living donor kidney transplant (hazard ratio=4.3, 95% confidence interval=2.7, 6.8) and having greater transplant knowledge (hazard ratio=1.2, 95% confidence interval=1.1, 1.3) were more likely to receive living donor kidney transplants. CONCLUSIONS Because patients who began transplant evaluation with greater transplant knowledge and motivation were ultimately more successful at receiving transplants years later, behavioral and educational interventions may be very successful strategies to reduce or overcome racial disparities in transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|