Monthly screening for BK viremia is an effective strategy to prevent BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

Polyomavirus nephropathy: diagnosis, histologic features, and differentiation from acute rejection

Polyomaviruses, particularly BK virus, are ubiquitous latent infections that may reactivate with immunosuppression during kidney transplantation, resulting in polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN). The levels of viruria and viremia serve as tools for screening and making a presumptive diagnosis of PVN, respectively, while a definitive diagnosis requires a kidney biopsy. There are histologic classifications of PVN based on the extent of tubular cell viral infection, interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammation. These classifications correlate to some degree with graft function and loss, aiding in determining treatment efficacy and prognostication. PVN has histologic overlap with acute cell-mediated rejection, making the differential diagnosis challenging, although there are suggestive features for these different causes of graft dysfunction. This article reviews the diagnosis, histologic findings, and classifications of PVN, and discusses how to differentiate viral nephropathy from acute rejection.

Development of de novo donor-specific antibodies in renal transplant recipients with BK viremia managed with immunosuppression reduction

BACKGROUND

Reduction of immunosuppression (IS) upon detection of Polyomavirus (BK) viremia is widely used to prevent BK virus nephropathy. This retrospective case-control study assesses the frequency of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in renal transplant recipients with IS modulation due to BK viremia and the associated risk of antibody mediated rejection.

METHODS

Our cohort included recipients of kidney transplantation between 2007 and 2017 with clinical, HLA antibody, and biopsy data. BK positivity was defined as viremia >10 000 c/ml or biopsy proven BK nephropathy. A total of 190 BK cases matched our inclusion criteria, each case was matched with two controls based on gender, donor type, and transplant within 1 year (N = 396).

RESULTS

Despite lower number of HLA antigen mismatches (mean = 3.5 vs. 4.4, p < .001), dnDSA rates were higher in BK cases than in control group (22.1% vs. 13.9%, p = .02), with the majority detected following IS reduction for BK infection, and arising earlier posttransplant compared with no BK infection (294d vs. 434d, p < .001). Antibody mediated rejection rates were similar between cases and controls (8.9% and 8.3%, respectively), but rejection was more likely to occur earlier posttransplant in the BK cases (354d vs. 602d, p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a link between IS reduction and the generation of dnDSA and/or rejection, supporting close monitoring for DSA in patients with reduced IS due to BK infection given their increased risk to develop dnDSA.

BK Polyomavirus Infection and Risk Factors in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus infection is a critical complication affecting graft survival after kidney transplant. We aimed to determine the frequency, the effect on graft function, and the risk factors of BK polyomavirus infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 144 pediatric patients (female/male: 67/77; 0-18 years of age) who received kidney transplants in the past 10 years at our center. Demographic/ laboratory data, kidney failure etiologies, donor types, and immunosuppressive treatments were recorded. Patients were grouped as those with and without BKV infection, with groups compared in terms of transplant age, sex, kidney failure etiology, donor type, immunosuppressive treatments, presence of ureteral stents, acute rejection episodes, accompanying viral infections, glomerular filtration rate, and graft loss rate.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (8.3%) had BK polyomavirus infection. All 12 patients had viruria (8.3%), 8 (5.5%) had viremia, and 4 (2.8%) had BK polyomavirus nephropathy. Two patients (1.4%) had graft loss because of BK polyomavirus nephropathy. When patients with and without infection were compared, no significant differences were found in terms of sex, transplant age, donor type, presence of a ureteral stent, acute rejection, graft loss, or immunosuppressive treatment (P > .05). Rates of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract were 30.3% and 66.6% in those without and with BK polyomavirus infection, respectively (P < .05). The group positive for BK polyomavirus had a significantly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus infection versus the group without infection (P < .05). Glomerular filtration rate values at years 1 and 3 were similar between groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of BK polyomavirus nephropathy in pediatric patients undergoing kidney transplant in our center was consistent with data from other centers. Graft loss can be prevented by early detection and treatment through close periodic control and adequate evaluation of risk factors.

BK Polyomavirus-specific T Cells as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker for BK Polyomavirus Infections After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation, uncontrolled BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication causes kidney graft failure through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN), but markers predicting outcome are missing. BKPyV-specific T cells may serve as a predictive marker to identify patients at risk of persistent DNAemia and BKPyVAN.

METHODS

Out of a total of 114 pediatric kidney recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2018, 36 children with posttransplant BKPyV-DNAemia were identified. In a prospective noninterventional study, BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were measured in 32 of 36 viremic pediatric kidney recipients using intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. The course of the BKPyV replication was monitored with regard to duration of BKPyV-DNAemia and need of therapeutic intervention and diagnosis of proven BKPyVAN.

RESULTS

Levels of BKPyV-specific T cells negatively correlated with subsequent duration of BKPyV-DNAemia. Patients with BKPyV-specific CD4 T cells ≥0.5 cells/µL and/or BKPyV-specific CD8 T cells ≥0.1 cells/µL had transient, self-limiting DNAemia (PPV 1.0, NPV 0.86). BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells below these thresholds were found in children with persistent BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyVAN with need for therapeutic intervention. After reducing immunosuppressive therapy, levels of BKPyV-specific CD4 T cells increased while plasma BKPyV-DNAemia declined.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that BKPyV-specific T cell levels may help to distinguish patients with transient, self-limiting BKPyV-DNAemia from those with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyVAN, who would benefit from individualized therapeutic interventions such as reduced immunosuppression. Thereby the risk for rejection because of unnecessary reduction of immunosuppression in case of self-limiting BKPyV-DNAemia can be minimized.

Antithymocyte induction dosing and incidence of opportunistic viral infections using steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is limited literature evaluating rATG induction dosing and incidence of opportunistic viral infections when using steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, study compared high rATG (>4.5 mg/kg) versus low (<4.5 mg/kg) induction dosing and the overall incidence of early opportunistic viral infection at 180 days in the setting of maintenance immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rapid steroid withdrawal, and a tiered antiviral prevention strategy based on donor-recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients were included; 76 patients received low-dose and 133 patients received high-dose rATG. Incidence of overall opportunistic viral infection occurred more frequently in patients who received high compared to low dose (29.8% vs 25% p = .030). Incidence of CMV infection was also significantly increased in the high-dose group (31.6% vs 18.4% p = .039). In a multivariable model, rATG dose, as a continuous variable, remained a significant independent predictor of infection along with CMV risk (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.09) controlling for age and CMV risk. There were no differences in graft-related outcomes at 180 days.

CONCLUSION

Higher cumulative rATG induction dose was associated with increased incidence of opportunistic viral infections, in the setting of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in the early post-transplant period.

Development and validation of an optimized integrative model using urinary chemokines for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection

The urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are promising noninvasive diagnostic markers of acute rejection (AR) in kidney recipients, but their levels might be confounded by urinary tract infection (UTI) and BK virus (BKV) reactivation. Multiparametric model development and validation addressed these confounding factors in a training set of 391 samples, optimizing the diagnostic performance of urinary chemokines. CXCL9/creatinine increased in UTI and BKV viremia with or without nephropathy (BKVN) (no UTI/leukocyturia/UTI: -0.10/1.61/2.09, P = .0001 and no BKV/viremia/BKVN: -0.10/1.90/2.29, P < .001) as well as CXCL10/creatinine (1.17/2.09/1.98, P < .0001 and 1.13/2.21/2.51, P < .001, respectively). An optimized 8-parameter model (recipient age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor specific antibodies, UTI, BKV blood viral load, CXCL9, and CXCL10) diagnosed AR with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.89) and remained highly accurate at the time of screening (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.48-1) or indication biopsies (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and within the first year (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91) or later (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96), achieving AR diagnosis with an AUC of 0.85 and 0.92 (P < .0001) in 2 external validation cohorts. Decision curve analyses demonstrated the clinical utility of the model. Considering confounding factors rather than excluding them, we optimized a noninvasive multiparametric diagnostic model for AR of kidney allografts with unprecedented accuracy.

Beyond Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus: a Review of Viruses Composing the Blood Virome of Solid Organ Transplant and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Viral primary infections and reactivations are common complications in patients after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Among these patients, viral infections are frequently associated with viremia. Beyond the usual well-known viruses that are part of the routine clinical management of transplant recipients, numerous other viral signatures or genomes can be identified in the blood of these patients. The identification of novel viral species and variants by metagenomic next-generation sequencing has opened up a new field of investigation and new paradigms. Thus, there is a need to thoroughly describe the state of knowledge in this field with a review of all viral infections that should be scrutinized in high-risk populations. Here, we review the eukaryotic DNA and RNA viruses identified in blood, plasma, or serum samples of pediatric and adult SOT/HSCT recipients and the prevalence of their detection, with a particular focus on recently identified viruses and those for which their potential association with disease remains to be investigated, such as members of the Polyomaviridae, Anelloviridae, Flaviviridae, and Astroviridae families. Current knowledge of the clinical significance of these viral infections with associated viremia among transplant recipients is also discussed. To ensure a comprehensive description in these two populations, individuals described as healthy (mostly blood donors) are considered for comparative purposes. The list of viruses that should be on the clinicians' radar is certainly incomplete and will expand, but the challenge is to identify those of possible clinical significance.

Immunosuppression, BK polyomavirus infections, and BK polyomavirus-specific T cells after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy increases risk of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). Outcomes of BKPyV viremia are various and prognostic markers are missing. The impact of different immunosuppressive regimens on BKPyV infections is currently under discussion.

METHODS

We analyzed immunosuppressive therapy and BKPyV-specific cellular immunity to distinguish patients at risk of BKPyVAN from those with self-limiting viremia for purposes of risk-stratified BKPyV management. In a retrospective analysis, 46 pediatric kidney recipients with BKPyV viremia were analyzed with regard to duration of BKPyV viremia and immunosuppressive therapy; in addition, in 37/46 patients, BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were measured.

RESULTS

Nine patients showed persistent BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN, and required therapeutic intervention, while 37 patients had asymptomatic, self-limiting viremia. At onset of viremia, 78% of patients with persistent viremia and BKPyVAN were treated with tacrolimus, whereas tacrolimus therapy was significantly less frequent in patients with self-limiting viremia (14%). The majority of patients with transient, self-limiting viremia received cyclosporine A (81%) and/or mTOR inhibitors (81%). Patients with persistent BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN showed lack of BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells (6/6), whereas the majority of patients with self-limiting viremia (27/31) had detectable BKPyV-specific CD4 and/or CD8 T cells ≥ 0.5 cells/μl (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that tacrolimus enhances risk of BKPyVAN with need of therapeutic intervention, whereas under cyclosporine A and mTOR inhibitors, the majority of pediatric kidney recipients showed self-limiting viremia. In patients at risk of BKPyV infections, combination of cyclosporine A and mTOR inhibitor may be advantageous.

Diagnostics, treatment, and immune response in BK polyomavirus infection after pediatric kidney transplantation

After pediatric kidney transplantation BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infections are associated with an increased risk of graft loss by BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BkPyVAN). However, suitable prognostic markers for the individual outcome of BKPyV infections are missing and the management of therapeutic interventions remains a challenge to the success of pediatric kidney transplantation. This review gives an overview on current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the field of BKPyV infections after pediatric kidney transplantation. Methods determining the individual immune response to BKPyV are described and their usability is discussed. There is growing evidence that BKPyV-specific T cells (BKPyV-Tvis) may serve as prognostic markers in order to steer immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric kidney recipients with BKPyV viremia in future. Prospective randomized trials in viremic kidney recipients comparing Tvis-steered therapeutic intervention with standard reduction of immunosuppression are needed before implementation of BKPyV-Tvis monitoring in routine care of BKPyV infections.

Clinical manifestations of BK virus infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients

Background

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) infection is an important cause of graft loss in kidney transplant patients.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical findings and risk factors for BKV in pediatric patients after kidney transplantation.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included 31 pediatric kidney transplant recipients from January 2002 to December 2017. Two patients received 2 transplantations during the study period, and each transplant was analyzed independently. Total number of cases is 33 cases with 31 patients. BKV infection was confirmed from blood samples via periodic quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results

The mean age at kidney transplantation was 11.0±4.7 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.7:1. Three patients had a past medical history of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for solid tumors. Nine patients (27.3%) developed BKV infection. The median period from kidney transplantation to BKV detection in blood was 5.6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between patients with and those without BKV infection. Among 9 patients with BKV viremia, 7 were treated by reducing their immunosuppressant dose, and BKV was cleared in 6 of these 7 patients. In the other 2 BKV-positive patients, viremia improved without immunosuppressant reduction.

Conclusion

BKV infection is common in children with kidney transplantation and might not have affected short-term renal function in our patient sample due to early immunosuppressant reduction at the time of BKV detection.

BK viremia and nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients

The renal survival rate of pediatric renal transplant recipients (pRTR) has improved with the use of modern immunosuppressive agents; however, the incidence of post-transplantation viral infection has increased. This study investigated the incidence of BK viremia and BK viral-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in pRTR. One-hundred-and-thirty-four pRTR were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 20, 14.9%) comprised those who were prospectively followed with longitudinal analyses after renal transplantation in the time period from May 2007 to June 2008, while group 2 (n = 114, 85.1%) cross-sectional study of those who were transplanted from January 1994 to April 2007. The mean ages at transplantation in groups 1 and 2 were 10.6 ± 4.7 years and 7.8 ± 4.5 years, respectively. BK viremia was detected in four (20.0%) patients in group 1, and seven (6.1%) in group 2 (P = 0.04), with increased incidence associated with induction therapy. The median time to detection of BK viremia after transplantation was 44 days in group 1 and 142 days in group 2. BKVAN was diagnosed in three patients (two in group 1 and one in group 2). All three patients diagnosed with BKVAN were receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids as maintenance immunosuppression. Reducing immunosuppression resulted in reduced BK viremia. Monitoring for BK viremia and BKVAN is important in pRTR being treated with the current immunosuppressive regimen. The first line of treatment for BK viremia remains careful reduction of immunosuppression and close monitoring of renal allograft function.

Higher Incidence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Allograft Recipients with Alport Syndrome

A retrospective review was performed to assess the risk factors and outcomes of BK virus infection and nephropathy (BKVN), an early complication in pediatric kidney allograft recipients. The study investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of BK viremia and BKVN in a Korean population of pediatric patients who received renal transplantation from 2001–2015 at the Seoul National University Hospital. BKVN was defined as biopsy-proven BKVN or plasma BK viral loads >10,000 copies/mL for >3 weeks. BK viremia was defined as a BK viral load >100 copies/mL in blood. Among 168 patients assessed for BK virus status, 30 patients (17.9%) tested positive for BK viremia at a median of 12.6 months after transplantation. BKVN was diagnosed in six patients (3.6%) at a median of 13.4 months after transplantation. Three of the six BKVN patients had Alport syndrome (p = 0.003), despite this disease comprising only 6% of the study population. Every patient with BK viremia and Alport syndrome developed BKVN, while only 11.1% of patients with BK viremia progressed to BKVN in the absence of Alport syndrome. Multivariate analysis revealed that Alport syndrome was associated with BKVN development (hazard ratio 13.2, p = 0.002). BKVN treatment included the reduction of immunosuppression, leflunomide, and intravenous immunoglobulin. No allografts were lost in the two years following the diagnosis of BKVN. In summary, the incidence of BKVN in pediatric kidney allograft recipients was similar to findings in previous reports, but was higher in patients with underlying Alport syndrome.

Clinical utility of leflunomide for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a significant clinical issue in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. No specific therapy is currently available, although treatment with leflunomide may be part of the therapeutic strategy. Here, we sought to examine the impact of leflunomide on the evolution of BKPyVAN.

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study conducted in 3 French transplant centers. KT recipients who developed BKPyVAN and received leflunomide after failure of other treatment approaches were deemed eligible. Graft function, viral clearance, patient survival, rejection rates, treatment tolerability, and immunosuppression levels served as the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were included. Treatment with leflunomide was started after a mean of 1.4 ± 4.1months  after BKPyVAN diagnosis. Between the introduction of leflunomide and the end of follow-up, creatinine levels increased by 31 ± 118% (P = 0.04), whereas viremia decreased by 79 ± 37% (P < 0.001). Blood viral clearance was observed in 76% of the study patients. Rejection episodes occurred in 33% of the participants. Eleven patients lost their graft (9 of which because of BKPyVAN). Ten patients developed adverse effects and 3 discontinued leflunomide.

CONCLUSION

We cannot conclude about the exact place of leflunomide in the therapeutic strategy of BKPyVAN. It may be a part of the therapy to promote BK polyomavirus clearance in cases of BKPyVAN who fail to improve after immunosuppression lowering alone. Unfortunately, a significant decline in renal function and high rejection rates remain major clinical challenges.

Conversion From Mycophenolates to Mizoribine Is Associated With Lower BK Virus Load in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) is a graft-threatening complication after kidney transplantation. Current consensus regarding the prevention of BKVAN is to screen for BK viremia and to treat sustained BK viremia through reducing immunosuppression. This study assessed the effect of conversion from mycophenolates to mizoribine (MZR) on the prevention of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

De novo kidney transplant recipients were screened for BK viruria. Sustained high levels of BK viruria (>10⁷ copies/mL) were treated by switching from mycophenolates to MZR. The reduction and clearance of BK viruria and viremia were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty kidney transplant recipients with high levels BK viruria were enrolled, including 11 recipients with BK viremia. After 6 months of MZR therapy, only 3 recipients still had high levels of BK viruria. The clearance rate of BK viremia was 100%. One episode of acute rejection occurred (2.0%) and was reversed by steroid administration. The serum uric acid level of the recipients was similar before and after switching to MZR, but the proportion of recipients receiving uric acid-reducing drugs increased significantly after 3 months of MZR therapy (19/50 vs 31/50; P = .02). No new cases of BK viremia were observed after conversion to MZR.

CONCLUSION

Conversion from mycophenolates to MZR in kidney transplant recipients with sustained high levels of BK viruria was associated with reduction of BK viruria and clearance of BK viremia. This may be an effective approach to prevent BK viremia and BKVAN.

Viral Diagnostics

This chapter discusses recent developments in diagnostics for cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), BK virus (BKV), community respiratory viruses (CRVs), parvovirus, hepatitis viruses, HIV, and other viral agents of importance in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Management of BK Polyomavirus Infection in Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients: A Review Article

BK virus (BKV) can cause graft dysfunction or failure in kidney transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) emerged as a common complication in the late 1990s, probably due to the introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents. BKVAN occurred in up to 5% of kidney transplant recipients, with graft failure in up to 70%. Since universal implementation of effective screening and treatment strategies, BKV is no longer a common cause of graft failure; reported graft loss is only 0% to 5%. This article briefly describes BK virology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Determination of viremia cut-off for risk to develop BKPyV-associated nephropathy among kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a consequence of BKPyV replication in the urinary tract in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the prevalence of BKPyV replication and BKPyVAN, risk factors associated to sustained viremia and BKPyVAN, and viremia cut-off that best predict the occurrence of sustained viremia and nephropathy in KTR of a single University Hospital Kidney Transplant Center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All KTR undergoing transplantation from August 2010 to December 2011 were enrolled and monitored up to 2 years posttransplantation for BKPyV viruria by decoy cells shedding or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viremia by PCR. Kidney biopsy was indicated if sustained viremia (two or more viremia above 10 000 copies/mL) to confirm BKPyVAN diagnosis.

RESULTS

In this study, 326 transplants were performed and 246 patients were included. Prevalence of viruria was 36.9%, viremia 22.3% and nephropathy 3.2%. Male gender was the only risk factor associated to sustained viremia or nephropathy. Cut-off value of viremia that best discriminates the progression to sustained viremia and to BKPyVAN was 37 488 and 44 956 copies/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of viruria, viremia, and nephropathy were similar to those reported in literature but the cut-off value of viremia that best discriminates the risk of progression to nephropathy was greater than the value usually reported, which is 10 000 copies/mL.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of late-onset BK virus nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK virus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a major complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and typically occurs within 1 year of transplant. Guidelines vary in recommendations for BKPyV screening beyond 1 year. A systematic characterization of risk factors and outcomes of late-onset (>1 year) BKPyVAN has not previously been reported.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared characteristics and outcomes of early- (<1 year) and late-onset BKPyVAN (definitive [biopsy-confirmed] or presumptive [plasma BKPyV >10 000 copies/mL]) in a cohort of 671 KTR and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients between 2008 and 2013 at a single US transplant center. Proportions were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test with P < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

BKPyVAN was diagnosed in 96 (14.3%) patients (proven 16.7%, presumptive 83.3%): 79 (82.3%) early- and 17 (17.7%) late-onset. The proportion with late-onset BKPyVAN was significantly higher among SPK than KTR (4 of 7 [57.1%] vs 13 of 89 [14.6%], P = .017). Late-onset represented "de novo" infection (no BKPyV detection within the first year) in 14 (82.4%) and progression of earlier lower grade BKPyV reactivation in 3 (17.6%). Clinical outcomes were similar for early- and late-onset BKPyVAN (P > .05 all comparisons). In a pooled analysis of prior studies of BKPyVAN in SPK recipients, 62.9% (17 of 27) were late-onset.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of BKPyVAN is late-onset, especially among SPK recipients, and supports a longer duration of BKPyV monitoring for SPK recipients than recommended in some guidelines.

Impact of low-level BK polyomavirus viremia on intermediate-term renal allograft function

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is a significant cause of premature renal transplant failure. High-level BKPyV viremia is predictive for PyVAN; however, low-level BKPyV viremia does not necessarily exclude the presence of PyVAN. As data are limited regarding whether or not low-level BKPyV viremia has an effect on intermediate-term graft outcome, this study analyzes the impact of low-level BKPyV viremia on intermediate-term graft function and outcome compared with high-level viremia and non-viremic patients.

METHODS

All renal transplant patients received follow-up examinations at the Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen. Patients were screened for BKPyV viremia and stratified into three groups according to their maximum BKPyV load in serum (low-level viremia, high-level viremia, and no viremia).

RESULTS

In 142 of 213 (67%) patients, BKPyV was never detected in serum; 42 of 213 (20%) patients were found positive for low-level viremia (≤10⁴ copies/mL); and 29 of 213 (13%) patients showed high-level viremia (>10⁴ copies/mL). No significant differences regarding transplant function and graft failure were observed between patients without BKPyV viremia (delta estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] +0.1 mL/min [month 1 vs last visit at month 44]) and patients with low-level BKPyV viremia (delta eGFR -1.7 mL/min). In patients with high-level viremia, transplant function was significantly restricted (delta eGFR -6.5 mL/min) compared with low-level viremia until the last visit at 44 ± 9.7 months after transplantation. Although the graft function and graft loss were worse in the high-level viremia group compared with no viremia (eGFR 37 vs 45 mL/min), the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

High-level viremia was associated with impaired graft function. In contrast, low-level BKPyV viremia had no significant impact on intermediate-term graft function.

BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies

BK polyomavirus (BKV) causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections within renal tubular cells and the uroepithelium, with minimal clinical implications. However, reactivation of BKV in immunocompromised individuals following renal or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause serious complications, including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), ureteric stenosis, or hemorrhagic cystitis. Implementation of more potent immunosuppression and increased posttransplant surveillance has resulted in a higher incidence of BKVAN. Antiviral immunity plays a crucial role in controlling BKV replication, and our increasing knowledge about host-virus interactions has led to the development of improved diagnostic tools and clinical management strategies. Currently, there are no effective antiviral agents for BKV infection, and the mainstay of managing reactivation is reduction of immunosuppression. Development of immune-based therapies to combat BKV may provide new and exciting opportunities for the successful treatment of BKV-associated complications.

Graft loss among renal-transplant recipients with early reduction of immunosuppression for BK viremia

AIM

To review the incidence of graft loss and acute rejection among renal transplant recipients with early reduction of immunosuppression for BK viremia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive de-novo kidney-only transplants from January 2009 to December 2012 to evaluate the incidence of Polyoma-virus associated nephropathy (PyVAN). Recipient plasma was screened for BKV DNA via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-transplant and on worsening graft function. Immunosuppression was reduced at ≥ 3-log copies/mL. Those with viremia of ≥ 4-log copies/mL (presumptive PyVAN) underwent renal transplant biopsy. Presumptive PyVAN (PP) and definitive PyVAN (DP; biopsy-proven) were treated by immunosuppression reduction (IR) only.

RESULTS

Among 319 kidney transplant recipients, the median age was 53 years (range 19-83), 65.8% were male, and 58.9% were white. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was found in 18.5% within 0-168 wk. Death-censored graft loss occurred in 5.3% (n = 17) and graft loss attributable to PyVAN was 0.6% (n = 2). Forty-seven patients were diagnosed with PP (14.7%) and 18 (5.6%) with DP. Graft loss among participants with PyVAN (8.5%) and those without (4.8%) was not significantly different. Deceased donor kidney transplantation (OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.1-4.6) and AR (OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.2-4.7) were associated with PyVAN in the multivariate analysis. BK viremia between 3 and 4-log copies/mL occurred in 27 patients, all of whom underwent IR. Of these, 16 (59%) never developed PyVAN while 11 (41%) developed PyVAN (4 DP, 7 PP) within a range of 11-39 wk.

CONCLUSION

Instituting an early reduction of immunosuppression, in the absence of adjunctive antivirals, is effective at preventing PyVAN and may be associated with a lower incidence of graft-loss without a reciprocal increase in the incidence of acute rejection.

Outcomes of renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection and BK virus surveillance in the Auckland region from 2006 to 2012

AIM

To evaluate incidence, risk factors and treatment outcome of BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) in a cohort of renal transplant recipients in the Auckland region without a formal BK polyomavirus (BKV) surveillance programme.

METHODS

A cohort of 226 patients who received their renal transplants from 2006 to 2012 was retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six recipients (33.6%) had a BK viral load (BKVL) test and 9 patients (3.9%) developed BKVN. Cold ischaemia time (HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.04-1.35) was found to be a risk factor for BKVN. Four recipients with BKVN had complete resolution of their BKV infection; 1 recipient had BKVL less than 625 copies/mL; 3 recipients had BKVL more than 1000 copies/mL and 1 had graft failure from BKVN. BKVN has a negative impact on graft function [median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 22.5 (IQR 18.5-53.0) mL/min per 1.73 m², P = 0.015), but no statistically significant difference (P = 0.374) in renal allograft function was found among negative BK viraemia group [median eGFR 60.0 (IQR 48.5-74.2) mL/min per 1.73 m²), positive BK viraemia without BKVN group [median eGFR 55.0 (IQR 47.0-76.0) mL/min per 1.73 m²] and unknown BKV status group [median eGFR 54.0 (IQR 43.8-71.0) mL/min per 1.73 m²]. The incidence and treatment outcomes of BKVN were similar to some centres with BKV surveillance programmes.

CONCLUSION

Recipients with BVKN have poorer graft function. Although active surveillance for BKV has been shown to be effective in reducing incidence of BKVN, it should be tailored specifically to that transplant centre based on its epidemiology and outcomes of BKVN, particularly in centres with limited resources.

Onset and progression of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after BK polyomavirus and preemptive immunosuppression reduction

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viremia/nephropathy and reduction in immunosuppression following viremia may increase the risk of alloimmune activation and allograft rejection. This study investigates the impact of BKPyV viremia on de novo donor anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies (dnDSA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All primary renal transplants at East Carolina University from March 1999 to December 2010, with at least 1 post-transplant BKPyV viral load testing, were analyzed. Patients were negative for anti-HLA antibodies to donor antigens (tested via single antigen beads) at transplantation and at first BKPyV testing.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 174 patients (11%) tested positive for BKPyV viremia. Within 24 months of BKPyV viremia detection, 79% of BKPyV-viremic patients developed dnDSA. Only 20% of BKPyV viremia-persistent cases, compared to 86% of BKPyV viremia-resolved cases, developed dnDSA (P = 0.03). Poor allograft survival was evident in BKPyV viremia-persistent patients (60% failure by 2 years post BKPyV diagnosis) and in BKPyV viremia-resolved patients with dnDSA (5-year post BKPyV diagnosis allograft survival of 48%).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant BKPyV viremia and preemptive immunosuppression reduction is associated with high rates of dnDSA. When preemptively treating BKPyV viremia, dnDSA should be monitored to prevent allograft consequences.

[Infectious and neoplasic complications after kidney transplantation]

Infections and malignancies are the expected complications of immunosuppressive therapy, which non-specifically impairs cellular and humoral immune responses in renal transplant recipients. Infections were usually frequent and severe during the early post-transplant period (first year). Recent diagnostic methods (molecular biology) and availability of new antivirals, antifungal and antibiotic drugs made rapid diagnosis and systematic preventive strategies much easier and this resulted in a significant reduction of infections and infectious death in this population. However, new infectious agents like BK polyomavirus, hepatitis E virus, parvovirus (as well as Chigunkunya, West Nile and others in particular areas) were recently recognized as responsible of aggressive infections in the immunocompromised host. Malignancies are also common after transplantation, due to the intensity and duration of immunosuppression. Skin cancers and lymphoproliferative disorders are the most common and are undoubtedly caused by viral infections, but incidence of non-skin cancers is also increased. After reduction of immunosuppression, treatment is similar to non-transplant patients: Results are usually poor and cancer is now the third cause of death in transplant recipients. Due to their anti-proliferative and anti-tumoral properties, incidence of de novo cancer significantly decreased in patients receiving mTor inhibitors as maintenance immunosuppression; furthermore, in patients already diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma or recurrent skin cancers, introduction of mTor was associated with stabilisation and/or regression of malignant lesions.

Nephropathy Evolving Within the First Two Posttransplant Months With No Typical Cytopathic Lesions: Two Cases Presentation

BACKGROUND

We report 2 cases of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) emerging within the initial 8 posttransplant weeks. These cases were characterized by intraepithelial BK virus replication without typical nuclear inclusions in epithelial cells.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 70-year-old male recipient of a cadaveric kidney transplant had experienced unsatisfying graft function since the time of transplantation (Tx). One month after Tx, results of a graft biopsy revealed mild tubulointerstitial inflammation. No intraepithelial nuclear inclusions suggestive of viral infection were present at that time. The patient received intravenous methylprednisolone, and the dosage of tacrolimus was increased. Due to a further drop in the glomerular filtration rate, a subsequent kidney biopsy was performed during posttransplant week 10, which revealed lesions typical of PyVAN. Retrospectively performed SV40 staining revealed that intragraft polyomavirus replication was already present on posttransplant day 30. Basic immunosuppression reduction and ciprofloxacin administration were followed by BK viremia elimination, stabilization of graft function, and resolution of PyVAN. In another patient, a 62-year-old male recipient of a cadaveric renal graft, BK viremia was monitored from the time of Tx. Two months after Tx, the patient was found to have a BK viral load of 6 × 4 log(10)/mL. Results of the graft biopsy revealed fully preserved tubular epithelium, but SV40 staining was positive in some of these cells. After basic immunosuppression reduction and introduction of ciprofloxacin, the BK viral load dropped to 1 × log(10)/mL with graft function stabilization.

CONCLUSIONS

PyVAN may emerge as early as 4 weeks after Tx, with near-normal or acute rejection-like graft morphology. The early monitoring of plasma BK viral load, as well as SV40 staining, avoids misdiagnosis of this severe posttransplant complication.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: An Approach Proposal and Update on Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment

BK virus belongs to Polyomaviridae family; it causes 95% of nephropathy cases related to polyomavirus, with the other 5% caused by JC virus. Nephropathy jeopardizes graft function, causing a premature failure of the graft in 1%-10% of patients with kidney transplants. Nowadays, antiviral effective treatment is unknown, which is why blood and urine screening of renal transplantation patients has become the most important recommendation to guide the decrease of immunosuppression, and the only proven method to decrease poor outcomes. Different interventions, such as cidofovir, leflunomide, fluoroquinolones, and intravenous immunoglobulin, have been attempted with no improvement at all. This review aims to summarize the most relevant features of BK virus, historical issues, transmission mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic interventions.

Development of a BK virus real-time quantitative assay using the bioMérieux analyte-specific reagents in plasma specimens

OBJECTIVES

Viral load testing for BK virus (BKV) has become the standard of care for diagnosing BKV infection and monitoring therapy in kidney transplant patients. However, there are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved assays and no standardization among available tests.

METHODS

This study evaluated the performance of the analyte-specific reagent (ASR) BKV primers r-gene and probe r-gene reagents (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France) soon to become available on the US market for accuracy, linearity, precision, analytical sensitivity, specificity, and correlation with the Qiagen (Germantown, MD) BKV ASR test using commercial material and patient plasma samples.

RESULTS

The assay was linear from 204 to 3.92 million (2.31-6.6 log10) DNA copies/mL (coefficient of determination: R(2) =0.999). A dilution series demonstrated limits of detection and quantitation of 2.14 log10 and 2.30 log10 copies/mL (95% hit rate detection), respectively. Interrun precision was highly reproducible, with coefficients of variance ranging from 2.2% to 6.0%. A comparison of 34 matched samples showed a good agreement (R(2) = 0.87) between the bioMérieux BKV laboratory test and the Qiagen BKV ASR assay results, with an average negative bias (-0.28 log10 copies/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The laboratory-developed test with bioMérieux BKV reagents is a reliable and sensitive assay for BKV DNA quantitation compared with the Qiagen ASR test.

Clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on graft injury in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated by use of plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of BK viremia and BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and the clinical impact of BK viremia on graft outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

This study took place between January 2008 and June 2013. A total of 213 kidney transplant recipients were included. The prevalence of BK viremia and high BK viremia (≥1 × 10(4) copies/mL) was 66.7% (142/213) and 17.4% (37/213), respectively. A diagnosis of BKVAN was confirmed by means of allograft biopsy in 9 patients (4.2%). The estimated glomerular filtration rate after transplantation was similar in both the low BK viremia (<1 × 10(4) copies/mL) and non-BK viremia groups but was significantly lower in the high BK viremia group after 18 months. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve value of plasma polymerase chain reaction was 0.980. We found that a viral load >92,850 copies/mL was able to predict BKVAN with 89% sensitivity and 94.6% specificity. The risk factors for viral loads ≥1 × 10(4) copies/mL were cytomegalovirus infection, steroid pulse therapy, and acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

High BK viremia was associated with poor graft function after kidney transplantation. The serial monitoring of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients was helpful in predicting BKVAN and might prevent further progression.

European perspective on human polyomavirus infection, replication and disease in solid organ transplantation

Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) are a growing challenge in immunocompromised patients in view of the increasing number of now 12 HPyV species and their diverse disease potential. Currently, histological evidence of disease is available for BKPyV causing nephropathy and haemorrhagic cystitis, JCPyV causing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and occasionally nephropathy, MCPyV causing Merkel cell carcinoma and TSPyV causing trichodysplasia spinulosa, the last two being proliferative skin diseases. Here, the current role of HPyV in solid organ transplantation (SOT) was reviewed and recommendations regarding screening, monitoring and intervention were made. Pre-transplant screening of SOT donor or recipient for serostatus or active replication is currently not recommended for any HPyV. Post-transplant, however, regular clinical search for skin lesions, including those associated with MCPyV or TSPyV, is recommended in all SOT recipients. Also, regular screening for BKPyV replication (e.g. by plasma viral load) is recommended in kidney transplant recipients. For SOT patients with probable or proven HPyV disease, reducing immunosuppression should be considered to permit regaining of immune control. Antivirals would be desirable for treating proven HPyV disease, but are solely considered as adjunct local treatment of trichodysplasia spinulosa, whereas surgical resection and chemotherapy are key in Merkel cell carcinoma. Overall, the quality of the clinical evidence and the strength of most recommendations are presently limited, but are expected to improve in the coming years.

Polyomaviruses and disease: is there more to know than viremia and viruria?

Purpose of review

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) mainly caused by BK virus (BKV) remains the most common productive viral infection of the kidney. Over the past decade, clinical interest often focused on BK viremia and viruria as the diagnostic mainstays of patient management. The purpose of this review is to discuss viral nephropathy in the context of BK viremia and viruria and new strategies to optimize diagnostic accuracy and patient management. The emerging roles of polyomaviruses in oncogenesis, salivary gland disease, and post-bone marrow transplantation as well as novel Polyomavirus strains are highlighted.

Recent findings

Areas of investigation include proposals by the Banff working group on the classification of PVN and studies on PVN progression and resolution, including the role cellular immune responses may play during reconstitution injury. New noninvasive strategies to optimize the diagnosis of PVN, that is, the urinary ‘polyomavirus-haufen’ test and mRNA expression levels for BKV in the urine, hold great promise to accurately identify patients with viral nephropathy. Tools are now available to separate ‘presumptive’ from ‘definitive’ disease in various patient cohorts including individuals post-bone marrow transplantation. Recent observations also point to a currently underrecognized role of polyomaviruses in oncogenesis post-transplantation and salivary gland disease in patients with HIV-AIDS.

Summary

This review summarizes recent studies on PVN and the significance of the BKV strain in disease. Current paradigms for patient management post-(renal) transplantation are discussed in the setting of new observations. Issues that still require clarification and further validation are highlighted.

Quantitative analysis of BKV-specific CD4+ T cells before and after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV) is the main infectious cause of renal allograft dysfunction. Although recent studies showed an inverse correlation between BKV-specific T-cell responses and viral load after transplantation, the importance of pre-transplant response in the process of virus reactivation has only been studied once. In this study, we aimed to determine whether pre-transplant CD4+ T-cell response can be used for prediction of BKV reactivation and BKV nephropathy (BKVN), by a method that can practically be used in routine patient monitoring.

METHODS

BKV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses of 31 kidney recipients (all from live donors) were measured by an IFN-γ-enzyme-linked-immunospot (ELISPOT) method using mixture of peptides, at day 0 and +1, +3, and +6 months posttransplant. Additionally, seven other reactivation patients as another group were also analyzed. BKV viral loads in plasma were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Responses of 10 healthy people were also included as controls in the analysis.

RESULTS

All but one patient and all of the controls had detectable CD4+ T-cell responses. Reactivation occurred in 8 out of 31 patients. There was no significant association between pretransplant BKV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses and BKV reactivation and between BKV DNA levels and CD4+ T-cell responses. In the additional group consisting of reactivation patients, four patients who had BKVN showed negative correlation between BKV-DNA levels and BKV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses (p<0.05). One patient who developed BKVN, however, was not able to mount a similar CD4+ T-cell response to viral reactivation despite immunosuppressive reduction.

CONCLUSION

Even though our cohort is small, our results may suggest that pre-transplant measurement of BKV specific CD4+ T-cell response may not be necessary, and that post-transplant monitoring, particularly during reactivation, may be more helpful in the management of the infection.

Monitoring of polyomavirus BK replication and impact of preemptive immunosuppression reduction in renal-transplant recipients in China: a 5-year single-center analysis

This provides the long-term patient/graft survival and outcome of BK viremia and BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) in renal transplant recipients in the setting of intensive monitoring and preemptive of reduction of immunosuppression. Quantitative BKV DNA PCR and urinary cytology surveillance were performed regularly after transplantation in 229 kidney recipients. Patients with BK viremia and BKVAN were treated with 30-50% reduction in doses of tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored for BKV every 3-6 months. All the patients were followed for 5 years. Overall 5-year patient and graft survival were 95.6% and 92.1%, respectively, and independent of presence of decoy cells, BK viruria, viremia, or BKVAN. After reduction of immunosuppression, BK viremia (n = 38) resolved in 100% of patients, without increased acute rejection. Recurrent BK viremia was not observed in viremic patients without BKVAN (n = 30). All BKVAN patients (n = 7, 3.1%) cleared viremia with a mean time of 5.9 months (range 1-15 months) and manifested no decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from 1 month to 5 years after transplantation. Viral monitoring and preemptive reduction of immunosuppression resulted in the successful resolution of BK viremia and BKVAN with excellent graft survival and renal function at 5 years.

Persistent BK viremia does not increase intermediate-term graft loss but is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies

There are limited data regarding intermediate-term outcomes in patients with persistent BK viremia. Other viral infections have been implicated in the development of allosensitization through heterologous immunity, but the relationship between BK viremia and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is unexplored. In 2008, we initiated routine post-transplant BK viremia and DSA screening at our center; 785 kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant recipients were included in our study. Of these recipients, 132 (17%) recipients developed BK viremia during the study period. The median duration of BK viremia was 140 days (interquartile range=40-393 days), and persistent BK viremia was defined as lasting ≥140 days. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess differences in patient and allograft survival on the basis of BK viremia status; survival was modeled using Cox proportional hazard regression. After a median follow-up of 3 years, there was no significant difference in terms of patient (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.28 to 2.49) or allograft survival (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.73) between patients with and without BK viremia, which was confirmed in a time-varying analysis. In our logistic regression model, persistent BK viremia was strongly associated with the development of class II (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.98) but not class I (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.46 to 2.77) DSAs. These data suggest that persistent BK viremia does not negatively affect intermediate-term patient or allograft survival but is associated with increased risk for de novo DSA, although the exact mechanism is unclear.

BK virus infection: an update on diagnosis and treatment

BK virus, first isolated in 1971, is a significant risk factor for renal transplant dysfunction and allograft loss. Unfortunately, treatment options for BK virus infection are limited, and there is no effective prophylaxis. Although overimmunosuppression remains the primary risk factor for BK infection after transplantation, male gender, older recipient age, prior rejection episodes, degree of human leukocyte antigen mismatching, prolonged cold ischemia time, BK serostatus and ureteral stent placement have all been implicated as risk factors. Routine screening for BK has been shown to be effective in preventing allograft loss in patients with BK viruria or viremia. Reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of BK nephropathy treatment and is the best studied intervention. Laboratory-based methods such as ELISPOT assays have provided new insights into the immune response to BK and may help guide therapy in the future. In this review, we will discuss the epidemiology of BK virus infection, screening strategies, treatment options and future research directions.

Currently recommended BK virus (BKV) plasma viral load cutoff of ≥4 log10/mL underestimates the diagnosis of BKV-associated nephropathy: a single transplant center experience

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is a major cause of renal dysfunction and graft loss in renal transplant recipients. Monitoring plasma BK viral load (BKVL) is the recommended screening tool to predict BKVAN. American Society of Transplantation (AST) guidelines define a BKVL of ≥4 log10/mL (10,000 copies) as presumptive BKVAN and recommend reduction in immunosuppression. We evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the quantitative BKV DNA assay in predicting risk for BKVAN using the AST-recommended BKVL cutoff.

METHODS

In a retrospective, single-center study, all patients who underwent renal transplant at Henry Ford Hospital from January 2008 to August 2011 were analyzed (n = 490). Plasma BKVL Assay A (commercial large T antigen-based polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) was done in all patients. Renal biopsy was done if there was a rise in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg from baseline. BKVAN was confirmed by biopsy. As a subset to this study, from the same cohort, data for a set of 20 consecutive Assays A and B (in-house VP1-based PCR assay) from 15 patients over a period of 3 months were collected. Differences in physicians' clinical decision-making (CDM) were analyzed between the 2 assays using chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 413 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 222 patients had BK viremia. Among the 248 patients who had a renal biopsy done, 31 (12.5%) were found to have BKVAN. Eleven of the 31 (35%) patients had BKVL consistently <4 log10/mL, and thus were not diagnosed to have BKVAN using the AST-recommended BKVL cutoff of ≥4 log10/mL. A total of 8 patients lost their graft owing to BKVAN, including 3 patients with BKVL <4 log10/mL. Using a cutoff point of plasma BKVL of ≥4 log10/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predicative value of the PCR Assay A for the diagnosis of biopsy-proven BKVAN were 64.5%, 98.4%, 87.0%, and 94.5%, respectively, and for the diagnosis of presumptive nephropathy were found to be 76.6%, 99.4%, 95.8%, and 96.4%, respectively. In the second part of the study, presumptive nephropathy was detected in 8 samples using Assay A and 14 samples using Assay B. Six samples in Assay A would have led to no changes in the CDM in terms of reduction in immunosuppression. Kidney biopsy was carried out in 5 patients, 4 of whom had BKVAN and had Assay B log count of ≥5. If Assay A had been used in CDM, BKVAN would have been missed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing the current AST guideline cutoff of ≥4 log10 /mL, the PCR Assay A underestimated the diagnosis of BKVAN. Urgent standardization of the various BKVL assays and establishment of universal cutoff points is imperative to avoid BKVAN-related graft loss.

Test performance characteristics of quantitative nucleic acid testing for polyomaviruses in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

Screening for polyoma BK virus (BK) using nucleic testing (NAT) is recommended for kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients, but the performance characteristics of quantitative BK NAT at different thresholds of plasma BK viral loads are unclear. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative BK NAT as an add-on test to qualitative polyoma NAT for the diagnosis of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in kidney and kidney transplant recipients. We calculated the test sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values at the different thresholds of plasma BK viral load for BKVAN. At the recommended threshold of >1 × 10(3) serum BK copies/mL serum for test positivity, the sensitivity for BKVAN was 92.9% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 66.1-99.8) and specificity 79.1% (95%: CI 67.4-88.1), with corresponding positive and negative predictive values of 42.0% (95% CI: 24.8-57.7%) and 98.6% (95% CI: 98.3-99.9%), respectively. The overall area under curve for the quantitative BK NAT was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.97). Quantitative BK NAT displays properties of high sensitivity and specificity that are fit for purpose as an add-on test to qualitative polyomavirus NAT for kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients at risk of BKVAN.

Screening for BK viremia reduces but does not eliminate the risk of BK nephropathy: a single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

This study reviewed the outcomes of a screening protocol for BK viremia to determine if early diagnosis, followed by immunosuppression minimization, would prevent progression to nephropathy and graft loss.

METHODS

This review included 369 renal transplant recipients tested for BK virus at serial time points after transplantation. Management included immunosuppression minimization plus cidofovir treatment for BK nephropathy.

RESULTS

Recipients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with 8% prednisone-free and 6% who received desensitization. With a mean follow-up of 22 ± 10 months, 16% (n = 57) of recipients became BK viremia positive. The median (range) time to diagnosis was 3 (1-17) months. Because renal biopsy was performed selectively, 59% of recipients underwent biopsy, with 47% showing BK nephropathy. Seventy-four percent of recipients cleared the virus at a median (range) time of 9 (3-33) months, with four grafts lost to BK nephropathy. Cidofovir-treated recipients displayed a higher viral load at diagnosis but showed equivalent renal function at last evaluation. In multivariate analysis, recipient age, Asian ethnicity, deceased donor, and prednisone use were factors independently associated with BK viremia. Actuarial survival of BK-positive grafts was worse than that of BK-negative grafts (P<0.01, log-rank test). At 9 and 12 months, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of the BK-positive group was lower than that of the BK-negative cohort (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using a screening protocol combined with immunosuppression minimization, BK-positive recipients had a greater risk of graft loss and impaired function than recipients free of infection. Future investigations should focus on practices to prevent BK viremia.

Evaluating the impact of pre-transplant desensitization utilizing a plasmapheresis and low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin protocol on BK viremia in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A correlation exists between polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and the degree of immunosuppression. However, the impact of pre-transplant desensitization on the incidence of BKV viremia is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated living-donor RTR between January 2004 and December 2008 receiving routine BKV viral load monitoring. Patients were divided into those who underwent pre-transplant desensitization (n = 20) and those who did not (n = 71). The primary endpoint was the incidence of BKV viremia at 1 year post transplant.

RESULTS

All demographic data were similar, except for more female patients (65% vs. 36.6%; P = 0.0392) in the desensitized group. More desensitized patients had a previous transplant (75% vs. 12.7%; P < 0.0001) and were more likely to be induced with basiliximab (75% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.0021). Following transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rates were highest in the desensitized group (55% vs. 1.4%; P < 0.0001). The incidence of BKV viremia at 1 year post transplant was significantly higher in desensitized patients (45% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.0385). Desensitization was also associated with a higher prevalence of BKV viremia at any time post transplant (50% vs. 22.5%; P = 0.0245), polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (20% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.0198) and BKV-related allograft loss (10% vs. 0%; P = 0.0464). Also of note, in a subgroup analysis of only our desensitized patients, it did not appear that development of AMR significantly impacted the incidence of BKV viremia in these individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis reveals that pre-transplant desensitization significantly increases the risk for BKV viremia and nephropathy.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation

The human BK polyomavirus (BKV) is the major cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) putting 1-15% of kidney transplant patients at risk of premature allograft failure, but is less common in other solid organ transplants. Because effective antiviral therapies are lacking, screening kidney transplant patients for BKV replication in urine and blood has become the key recommendation to guide the reduction of immunosuppression in patients with BKV viremia. This intervention allows for expanding BKV-specific cellular immune responses, curtailing of BKV replication in the graft, and clearance of BKV viremia in 70-90% patients. Postintervention rejection episodes occur in 8-12%, most of which are corticosteroid responsive. Late diagnosis is faced with irreversible functional decline, poor treatment response, and graft loss. Adjunct therapies such as cidofovir, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulins have been used, but the benefit is not documented in trials. Retransplantation after PyVAN is largely successful, but requires close monitoring for recurrent BKV viremia.

Unusual presentations of BK virus infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients

BKV has emerged as a significant pathogen in the field of transplantation, predominantly causing BKV nephropathy in renal transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in HSCT recipients. However, case reports describe more diverse complications, and we too present three unusual cases of BKV infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients. First, we describe a case of biopsy-proven renal damage secondary to BKV prior to the onset of viremia, demonstrating that BKV nephropathy can occur without preceding viremia. We also present two renal transplant recipients with persistent BK viruria, one with BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and the other with microscopic hematuria. Therefore, we conclude that BKV manifestations may be more diverse than previously thought and suggest clinical utility in urine BKV qPCR testing in specific transplant recipients.

Other viral infections in solid organ transplantation

Viral infections are a major cause of morbidity and even mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. This article reviews key aspects of infections in solid organ transplant recipients from respiratory viruses, such as influenza, polyomavirus, erythrovirus B19 and measles.

Detection of BK virus in urine from renal transplant subjects by mass spectrometry

Background

The diagnosis and management of BK virus (BKV) reactivation following renal transplantation continues to be a significant clinical problem. Following reactivation of latent virus, impaired cellular immunity enables sustained viral replication to occur in urothelial cells, which potentially leads to the development of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Current guidelines recommend regular surveillance for BKV reactivation through the detection of infected urothelial cells in urine (decoy cells) or viral nucleic acid in urine or blood. However, these methods have variable sensitivity and cannot routinely distinguish between different viral subtypes. We therefore asked whether mass spectrometry might be able to overcome these limitations and provide an additional non-invasive technique for the surveillance of BKV and identification of recipients at increased risk of BKVAN.

Results

Here we describe a mass spectrometry (MS)-based method for the detection of BKV derived proteins directly isolated from clinical urine samples. Peptides detected by MS derived from Viral Protein 1 (VP1) allowed differentiation between subtypes I and IV. Using this approach, we observed an association between higher decoy cell numbers and the presence of the VP1 subtype Ib-2 in urine samples derived from a cohort of 20 renal transplant recipients, consistent with the hypothesis that certain viral subtypes may be associated with more severe BKVAN.

Conclusions

This is the first study to identify BK virus proteins in clinical samples by MS and that this approach makes it possible to distinguish between different viral subtypes. Further studies are required to establish whether this information could lead to stratification of patients at risk of BKVAN, facilitate distinction between BKVAN and acute rejection (AR), and ultimately improve patient treatment and outcomes.