Was antiviral prophylaxis necessary after kidney transplantation utilizing HBcAb+ donors? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines lack consensus on whether antiviral prophylaxes should be administered after kidney transplantation from HBcAb+ donors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of de novo HBV (DNH) infection, as well as graft and patient survival.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. We included relevant studies that assessed clinical outcomes following transplantation utilizing HBcAb+ kidneys. Summary measures of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for prevalence, risk factors, as well as graft and patient survival were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included for the final analysis. The DNH incidence was at 0.36% (9/2516) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 6%). HBsAb+ recipients (OR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.25-2.38), HBcAb+ recipients (OR: 3.11, 95%CI: 0.91-10.66, P = 0.071), and recipients not receiving any antiviral prophylaxis (OR: 1.26, 95%CI: 0.15-10.58) were not associated with higher DNH risk. Specifically, HBsAb-/HBcAb+ recipients had the highest DNH incidence (4.65%), followed by HBsAb-/HBcAb- (0.49%), HBsAb+/HBcAb- recipients (0.45%), and HBsAb+/HBcAb+ (0%). Furthermore, recipients receiving HBcAb+ kidneys had comparable graft survival (HR: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.94-1.19, P = 0.55) and patient survival (HR:1.16, 95%CI: 0.98-1.38, P = 0.090) compared with recipients receiving HBcAb- kidneys.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplantation utilizing HBcAb+ kidneys contributed to comparable graft and patient survival with an extremely low risk of HBV transmission. Antiviral prophylaxes may only be administered in HBsAb-/HBcAb+ recipients.

Management of Hepatitis C Virus and Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the Setting of Kidney Disease

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses unique challenges in patients with kidney disease. Direct-acting antivirals have been a major breakthrough in eradicating HCV infection, and several pangenotypic regimens are available for patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis with high cure rates and no need for dose adjustment. Direct-acting antiviral therapy alone can treat HCV-associated cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis; concurrent antiviral and immunosuppressive therapy is needed for cases of severe, organ-threatening manifestations of cryoglobulinemia. Immunosuppression may be needed for HBV-associated kidney disease (polyarteritis nodosa or membranous nephropathy) when there is evidence of severe immune-mediated injury while weighing the risk of potential viral activation. Most HBV antiviral agents need to be dose-adjusted in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis, and drug-drug interactions need to be carefully evaluated in patients with kidney transplants. Considerations for accepting HCV- and HBV-infected donors for kidney transplantation are discussed.

Incidence of post-transplant hepatitis B virus reactivation with the use of kidneys from donors with resolved hepatitis B virus infection

Donors with resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may be a solution for the organ shortage for kidney transplantation (KT). The purpose of this study was to clarify the current state of HBV markers after KT from donors with resolved HBV infection to HBV naïve recipients and the rate of HBV reactivation in recipients with resolved HBV infection. Furthermore, we investigated HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in transplanted organs from donors with resolved HBV infection and the capability of HBV replication in kidney cell lines. We retrospectively analysed the HBV status of 340 consecutive donors and recipients who underwent KT in a single centre. We prospectively measured cccDNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction in kidney biopsy specimens of 32 donors with resolved HBV infection. HBV reactivation was found in three recipients with resolved HBV infection (4.8%, 3/63) after KT. We analysed 45 cases of transplantation from donors with resolved HBV infection to HBV-naive recipients. One case (2.2%, 1/45) became seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) and in another case (2.2%, 1/45), HBV-DNA was detected qualitatively in an HBV naive recipient with a donor with resolved HBV infection. In the latter case, cccDNA was measured in the donor kidney during KT. HBV replication was observed in kidney cell lines with HBV plasmid transfection. In conclusion, the risk of reactivation in anti-HBc-positive donors is relatively low. However, post-transplant HBV monitoring should be conducted in all at-risk cases.

HBV-positive and HIV-positive organs in transplantation: A clinical guide for the hepatologist

Organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage organ disease, a severe condition associated with a high risk of waitlist mortality. It is primarily limited by a shortage of available organs. Maximising available donors can increase access to transplantation. Transplantation from donors positive for HBV and HIV has increased in many countries. However, antiviral therapies need to be readily available for recipients after transplantation to prevent possible reactivation of the virus following the administration of immunosuppressive therapies. Furthermore, the intentional transmission of a virus has practical, ethical, and clinical implications. In this review, we summarise the current research, focusing on grafts from donors positive for the HBV surface antigen, antibodies against the HBV core antigen, and HIV, to help hepatologists and physicians interested in transplantation to select the best antiviral and/or prophylactic regimens for after transplantation.

Use of Hepatitis B Virus-Positive Organs in Organ Transplantation

The significant morbidity and mortality of people with end-stage renal, liver, heart, and lung diseases in need of transplantation provides rationale for use of organs from donors who are hepatitis B positive. The recipient's hepatitis B status plays a key role in defining the prophylactic strategy. The availability of safe and effective therapies (hepatitis B antivirals and hepatitis B immune globulin) has contributed to the safety of using hepatitis B-positive donors. The outcomes in both liver and nonliver solid organ transplant recipients given hepatitis B-positive organs have been excellent if appropriate prophylactic therapies provided.

Kidney transplant from donors with hepatitis B: A challenging treatment option

Utilizing kidneys from donors with hepatitis B is one way to alleviate the current organ shortage situation. However, the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission remains a challenge that undermines the chance of organs being used. This is particularly true with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive donors despite the comparable long-term outcomes when compared with standard donors. To reduce the risk of HBV transmission, a comprehensive approach is needed. This includes assessment of donor risk, optimal allocation to the proper recipient, appropriate immunosuppressive regimen, optimizing the prophylactic therapy, and post-transplant monitoring. This review provides an overview of current evidence of kidney transplants from donors with HBsAg positivity and outlines the challenge of this treatment. The topics include donor risk assessment by adopting the nucleic acid test coupled with HBV DNA as the HBV screening, optimal recipient selection, importance of hepatitis B immunity, role of nucleos(t)ide analogues, and hepatitis B immunoglobulin. A summary of reported long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation and proposed criteria to utilize kidneys from this group of donors was also defined and discussed.

Risk of disease transmission in an expanded donor population: the potential of hepatitis B virus donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lack of availability of donor organs is a constant challenge that patients and providers face in transplantation. To address this shortage, donors that test positive for hepatitis B, in particular those with resolved infection, have been increasingly utilized in clinical practice. We review here the potential risks for the recipient and the advances in hepatitis B management that have made use of these donors a well tolerated and advisable proposition.

RECENT FINDINGS

As routine administration of antiviral prophylaxis in the posttransplant setting among those deemed high risk for transmission, outcomes for recipients of hepatitis B donors, including liver transplant recipients, have been comparable to uninfected donors. Universal hepatitis B nucleic acid testing of donors has also enhanced our ability to accurately inform recipients regarding transmission risk. Appropriate use of prophylaxis and careful monitoring for transmission posttransplant is key to ensuring no adverse outcomes occur.

SUMMARY

Treatment of hepatitis B has evolved over the past two decades. Expanding the donor pool with hepatitis B donors is now well tolerated, ethical, and advantageous to the transplant community at large. A clear discussion with recipients on the substantial benefit and low harm of using hepatitis B donors will lead to greater acceptance and utilization of these organs.

The effect of universal infant vaccination on the prevalence of hepatitis B immunity in adult solid organ transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity is recommended to optimize outcomes after solid organ transplantation (SOT). This study assessed the prevalence and predictors of HBV immunity at the time patients were placed on transplant waiting list over a period from 1997 to 2019 in a low HBV endemic region.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the University Hospitals Leuven transplant database. Minors and patients with past/current HBV infection were excluded. From 1986, Belgian patients are covered by the universal infant vaccination; therefore, birth cohort was stratified in those born ≥1986 vs <1986.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3297 SOT candidates. HBV immunity rate was superior in renal transplant candidates (55.3%), and this number was 21.5%, 15.4% and 16.8% for liver, cardiac and pulmonary transplant candidates, respectively, P < .001. Among liver transplant candidates, HBV immunity rate was 14.8% in decompensated cirrhotic patients and 27.9% in those without advanced cirrhosis (P < .001). The overall immunity rate increased from 19.3% in period 1997-2008 to 32.8% in 2009-2019, P < .001. In multivariable analyses, younger age (odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-0.98, P < .001) and birth cohort ≥ 1986 (OR 95% CI: 1.18-2.66, P = .006) were associated with increased HBV immunity.

CONCLUSION

An increase in HBV immunity was observed over a 20-year period related to the introduction of universal infant HBV vaccination. Nevertheless, this study highlights the low overall HBV immunity at the time of listing for organ transplantation and points out the need of an increased awareness and vaccination strategy at an early disease stage.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Children With Acquired Immunodeficiencies or Undergoing Immune Suppressive, Cytotoxic, or Biological Modifier Therapies

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a known complication of immune-suppressive, cytotoxic, and biological modifier therapies in patients currently infected with HBV or who have had past exposure to HBV. Nowadays, newer and emerging forms of targeted biologic therapies are available for the management of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions and solid-organ, bone marrow, or haematologic stem cell transplant but there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of patients with or at risk of HBV reactivation. The Hepatology Committee of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) together with a working group of ESPGHAN members with clinical and research expertise in viral hepatitis developed an evidence-based position paper on reactivation of HBV infection in children identifying pertinent issues addressing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this condition. Relevant clinical questions were formulated and agreed upon by all the members of the working group. Questions were answered and positions were based on evidence resulting from a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase from their inception to July 1, 2019. A document was produced and the working group and ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee members voted on each recommendation, using a formal voting technique. A recommendation was accepted provided upon agreement by at least 75% of the working group members. This position paper provides a comprehensive update on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of HBV reactivation in children.

Anti-HBc impacts on the risk of hepatitis B reactivation but not on survival of solid-organ transplant recipients

Immunosuppression can lead to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in hepatitis B core antigen antibodies (anti-HBc) positive patients, especially those undergoing chemotherapy, although there is limited data on solid organ recipients, especially lung transplantation. Our aim was to analyze the risk of HBV reactivation and the potential impact of anti-HBc-positive status (both donors and recipients) on prognosis in a lung, kidney, and liver transplantation cohort.Retrospective analysis including data from all transplants in adults (2011-2012) in a tertiary hospital, with prospective HBV serology study to assess the risk of reactivation and its possible impact on survival.In total, 392 transplant recipients were included (196 kidney, 113 lung, 83 liver). Pre-transplantation anti-HBc screening was more frequent in liver recipients (P < .001) and donors (P < .001) than in kidney or lung. Fifty-five (14%) recipients were anti-HBc-positive and were not undergoing antiviral prophylaxis. Three (5.4%) cases of HBV reactivation occurred: 2 in pre-transplant anti-HBc-positive recipients and 1 with prior unknown anti-HBc status. All were HBeAg+ with HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) >10E8 IU/mL and only mild fibrosis. Baseline recipient anti-HBc positive status was the only factor associated with HBV reactivation. No reactivation cases occurred in lung or kidney recipients of anti-HBc positive grafts. Survival was lower in lung transplants, especially in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and those with prior immunosuppression.Anti-HBc positive status is a risk factor for HBV reactivation in solid organ recipients. Anti-HBc testing is highly recommended in solid-organ transplant recipients in order to identify those anti-HBc positive and therefore candidates for periodical hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA screening after transplant.

Screening and Prophylaxis to Prevent Hepatitis B Reactivation: Transplant Recipients

Organ transplantation is a lifesaving procedure for many patients. To prevent rejection or graft-versus-host disease, recipients require long-term immunosuppression. In patients who have ever been exposed to hepatitis B, it is possible for reactivation to occur; this includes patients who are anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive only or both anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive and hepatitis B surface antibody-positive. The susceptibility to this varies with the nature of the transplant. Hepatitis B can be transmitted from donor to recipient. It is important to assess the hepatitis B status and formulate a strategy to prevent transmission and prevent reactivation.

Taiwan consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B

The experts of Taiwan Association for the Study of Liver (TASL) have actively participated and led the guidelines on hepatitis B virus (HBV) management by Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) which is the first international association for the study of liver to publish the statement on HBV management before. However, there are more and more new data on the natural history and treatment of HBV infection in the past decade. These include new application of an old biomarker (quantitative HBsAg), clinical significance of HBV genotype and naturally occurring mutations, the role of non-invasive examination in evaluating severity of hepatic fibrosis, clinical significance of outcome calculators, new drug or new combination strategies towards more effective therapy and organ transplantation including liver and non-liver transplantation. It is time to publish the guidelines on HBV management of Taiwan. Hence, TASL have conducted an expert meeting to review, to discuss and to debate the relevant literatures, followed by draft the manuscript of HBV management guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines include general management, indications for fibrosis assessment, time to start or stop drug therapy, choice of drug to initiate therapy, when and how to monitor the patients during and after stopping drug therapy. Recommendations on the therapy of patients in special circumstances, including women in childbearing age, patients with antiviral drug resistance, concurrent viral infection, hepatic decompensation, patient receiving immune suppression or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma, are also included.

INASL Guidelines on Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients receiving Chemotherapy, Biologicals, Immunosupressants, or Corticosteroids

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving chemotherapy, biologicals, immunosupressants, or corticosteroids is emerging to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with current or prior exposure to HBV infection. These patients suffer a dual onslaught of illness: one from the primary disease for which they are receiving the culprit drug that led to HBV reactivation, and the other from HBV reactivation itself. The HBV reactivation not only leads to a compromised liver function, which may culminate into hepatic failure; it also adversely impacts the treatment outcome of the primary illness. Hence, identification of patients at risk of reactivation before starting these drugs, and starting treatment aimed at prevention of HBV reactivation is the best strategy of managing these patients. There are no Indian guidelines on management of HBV infection in patients receiving chemotherapy, biologicals, immunosupressants, or corticosteroids for the treatment of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions, or solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) had set up a taskforce on HBV in 2016, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines for management of various aspects of HBV infection, relevant to India. In 2017 the taskforce had published the first INASL guidelines on management of HBV infection in India. In the present guidelines, which are in continuation with the previous guidelines, the issues on management of HBV infection in patients receiving chemotherapy, biologicals, immunosupressants, or corticosteroids are addressed.

Hepatitis Transmission Risk in Kidney Transplantation (the HINT study): A Cross-Sectional Survey of Transplant Clinicians in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Interpreting hepatitis serology and virus transmission risk in transplantation can be challenging. Decisions must balance opportunity to transplant against potential infection transmission. We aimed to survey understanding among the Australian and New Zealand medical transplant workforce of hepatitis risk in kidney donors and recipients.

METHODS

An anonymous, self-completed, cross-sectional survey was distributed via electronic mailing lists to Australian and New Zealand clinicians involved in kidney transplantation (2014-2015). We compared interpretation of clinical scenarios with paired donor and recipient hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus serology to recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. We used logistic regression modeling to investigate characteristics associated with decisions on transplant suitability in scenarios with poor (<50%) guideline concordance (odds ratios [OR]).

RESULTS

One hundred ten respondents had representative workforce demographics: most were male (63%) nephrologists (74%) aged 40 to 49 years. Although donor and recipient hepatitis status was largely well understood, transplant suitability responses varied among respondents. For a hepatitis B virus surface antigen-positive donor and vaccinated recipient, 44% suggested this was unsuitable for transplant (guideline concordant) but 35% suggested this was suitable with prophylaxis (guideline divergent). In 4 scenarios with transplant suitability guideline concordance less than 50%, acute transplant care involvement predicted guideline concordant responses (OR, 1.69; P = 0.04). Guideline concordant responses were chosen less by hepatologists, intensive care doctors (OR, 0.23, 0.35, respectively; P = 0.01), and New Zealanders (guideline concordant responses OR, 0.17; P < 0.01; alternative responses OR, 4.31; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite broadly consistent interpretations of hepatitis serology, transplant suitability decisions varied and often diverged from guidelines. Improved decision support may reduce clinician variability.

Hepatitis B in renal transplant patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses a significant challenge for both dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients despite its decreasing rates, especially in developed countries. The best preventive method is vaccination. Patients with chronic renal disease should ideally be vaccinated prior to dialysis, otherwise, reinforced vaccination practices and close antibody titer monitoring should be applied while on dialysis. HBV infected dialysis patients who are renal transplant candidates must be thoroughly examined by HBV-DNA, and liver enzyme testing and by liver biopsy. When needed, one must consider treating patients with tenofovir or entecavir rather than lamivudine. Depending on the cirrhosis stage, dialysis patients are eligible transplant recipients for either a combined kidney-liver procedure in the case of decompensated cirrhosis or a lone kidney transplantation since even compensated cirrhosis after sustained viral responders is no longer considered an absolute contraindication. Nucleoside analogues have led to improved transplantation outcomes with both long-term patient and graft survival rates nearing those of HBsAg(-) recipients. Moreover, in the cases of immunized HBsAg(-) potential recipients with concurrent prophylaxis, we are enabled today to safely use renal grafts from both HBsAg(+) and HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) donors. In so doing, we avoid unnecessary organ discarding. Universal prophylaxis with entecavir is recommended in HBV kidney recipients and should start perioperatively. One of the most important issues in HBV(+) kidney transplantation is the duration of antiviral prophylaxis. In the absence of robust data, it seems that prophylactic treatment may be discontinued in selected stable, low-risk recipients during maintenance immunosuppression and should be reintroduced when the immune status is altered. All immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation can be used in HBV(+) recipients. Immunosuppression is intimately associated with increased viral replication; thus it is important to minimize the total immunosuppression burden long term.

Molecular characterization of occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with end-stage liver disease in Colombia

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) occult infection (OBI) is a risk factor to be taken into account in transfusion, hemodialysis and organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize at the molecular level OBI cases in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Methods

Sixty-six liver samples were obtained from patients with diagnosis of end-stage liver disease submitted to liver transplantation in Medellin (North West, Colombia). Samples obtained from patients who were negative for the surface antigen of HBV (n = 50) were tested for viral DNA detection by nested PCR for ORFs S, C, and X and confirmed by Southern-Blot. OBI cases were analyzed by sequencing the viral genome to determine the genotype and mutations; additionally, viral genome integration events were examined by the Alu-PCR technique.

Results

In five cases out of 50 patients (10%) the criteria for OBI was confirmed. HBV genotype F (subgenotypes F1 and F3), genotype A and genotype D were characterized in liver samples. Three integration events in chromosomes 5q14.1, 16p13 and 20q12 affecting Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase T, Ras Protein Specific Guanine Nucleotide Releasing Factor 2, and the zinc finger 263 genes were identified in two OBI cases. Sequence analysis of the viral genome of the 5 OBI cases showed several punctual missense and nonsense mutations affecting ORFs S, P, Core and X.

Conclusions

This is the first characterization of OBI in patients with end-stage liver disease in Colombia. The OBI cases were identified in patients with HCV infection or cryptogenic cirrhosis. The integration events (5q14.1, 16p13 and 20q12) described in this study have not been previously reported. Further studies are required to validate the role of mutations and integration events in OBI pathogenesis.

Optimizing Outcomes in Pediatric Renal Transplantation Through the Australian Paired Kidney Exchange Program

Kidney paired donation (KPD) programs offer the opportunity to enable living kidney donation when immunological and other barriers prevent safe directed donation. Children are likely to require multiple transplants during their lifetime; therefore, high-level histocompatibility and organ quality matching are key priorities. Details are given for a cohort of seven pediatric renal transplantations performed through the Australian Kidney Exchange (AKX), including barriers to alternative transplantation and outcomes after KPD. Reasons for entering the KPD program were preformed donor-specific antibodies to their registered donor in five cases, ABO mismatch, and avoidance of the risk of exposure to hepatitis B virus. Four recipients were highly sensitized. All patients received transplants with organs of lower immunological risk compared with their registered donors. HLA eplet mismatch scores were calculated for donor-recipient pairs; three patients had improved eplet mismatch load with AKX donor compared with their registered donor. All grafts are functioning, with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 77 mL/min/1.73 m² (range 46-94 mL) and a follow-up range of 8-54 months, and no patient experienced clinical or histological rejection. KPD is a viable strategy to overcome many barriers to living donation for pediatric patients who have an otherwise suitable donor and provides an opportunity to minimize immunological risks.

Outcomes Among Children Who Received a Kidney Transplant in the United States From a Hepatitis B Core Antibody-Positive Donor, 1995-2010

BACKGROUND

Accepting kidneys for transplant from donors with a history of hepatitis B virus infection may increase the availability of organs for those with end-stage kidney disease. In adult recipients, kidney transplants from hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive donors have resulted in favorable graft and patient survival rates. However, pediatric organ transplant recipients have developing immune systems and a higher risk of infectious complications than adults. Accordingly, little is known about the outcomes of children who have received a kidney transplant from a hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive donor.

METHODS

We included 11 898 children ≤18 years of age who received a first kidney transplant in the United States between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2010, and who were recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We examined differences in graft and patient survival rates among children who received a kidney transplant from a hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive donor.

RESULTS

There were 199 children (1.7%) who received a kidney transplant from a hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive donor. More than 80% of these transplants occurred in recipients who were hepatitis B virus core antibody and surface antigen negative. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, there were no significant differences in the adjusted graft (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80-1.31]) or patient (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.73-1.73]) survival rates according to donor core antibody status.

CONCLUSIONS

It may be acceptable, on a case-by-case basis, to consider hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive donors for kidney transplants to seroprotected children with end-stage kidney disease.

Diagnosis of hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health problems leading to severe liver disease such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HBV is a circular, partly double-stranded DNA virus with various serological markers: hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBs, anti-HBc IgM and IgG, and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and anti-HBe. It is transmitted by sexual, parenteral and vertical route. One significant method to diminish the burden of this disease is timely diagnosis of acute, chronic and occult cases of HBV. First step of HBV diagnosis is achieved by using serological markers for detecting antigens and antibodies. In order to verify first step of diagnosis, to quantify viral load and to identify genotypes, quantitative or qualitative molecular tests are used. In this article, the serological and molecular tests for diagnosis of HBV infection will be reviewed.

Kidney Transplantation From Donors with Hepatitis B

The growing demand for organ donors to supply the increasing number of patients on kidney waiting lists has led most transplant centers to develop protocols that allow safe use of organs from donors with special clinical situations previously regarded as contraindications. Deceased donors with previous hepatitis B may be a safe resource to increase the donor pool even if there is still controversy among transplantation centers regarding the use of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donors for renal transplantation. However, when allocated to serology-matched recipients, kidney transplantation from donors with hepatitis B may result in excellent short-term outcome. Many concerns may arise in the long-term outcome, and studies must address the evaluation of the progression of liver disease and the rate of reactivation of liver disease in the recipients. Accurate selection and matching of both donor and recipient and correct post-transplant management are needed to achieve satisfactory long-term outcomes.

Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management

Use of organs from donors testing positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) may safely expand the donor pool. The American Society of Transplantation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the existing literature and developed consensus recommendations for recipient management following the use of organs from HBV positive donors. Transmission risk is highest with liver donors and significantly lower with non-liver (kidney and thoracic) donors. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduces the rate of transmission to liver recipients from isolated HBV core antibody positive (anti-HBc+) donors. Organs from anti-HBc+ donors should be considered for all adult transplant candidates after an individualized assessment of the risks and benefits and appropriate patient consent. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in liver recipients with no immunity or vaccine immunity but not in liver recipients with natural immunity. Antiviral prophylaxis may be considered for up to 1 year in susceptible non-liver recipients but is not recommended in immune non-liver recipients. Although no longer the treatment of choice in patients with chronic HBV, lamivudine remains the most cost-effective choice for prophylaxis in this setting. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin is not recommended.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) refers to the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of detectable hepatitis B surface antigen. Since OBI was first described in the late 1970s, there has been increasing interest in this topic. The prevalence of OBI varies according to the different endemicity of HBV infection, cohort characteristics, and sensitivity and specificity of the methods used for detection. Although the exact mechanism of OBI has not been proved, intra-hepatic persistence of viral covalently closed circular DNA under the host’s strong immune suppression of HBV replication and gene expression seems to be a cause. OBI has important clinical significance in several conditions. First, OBI can be transmitted through transfusion, organ transplantation including orthotopic liver transplantation, or hemodialysis. Donor screening before blood transfusion, prophylaxis for high-risk organ transplantation recipients, and dialysis-specific infection-control programs should be considered to reduce the risk of transmission. Second, OBI may reactivate and cause acute hepatitis in immunocompromised patients or those receiving chemotherapy. Close HBV DNA monitoring and timely antiviral treatment can prevent HBV reactivation and consequent clinical deterioration. Third, OBI may contribute to the progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease including hepatitis C. Finally, OBI seems to be a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma by its direct proto-oncogenic effect and by indirectly causing persistent hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. However, this needs further investigation. We review published reports in the literature to gain an overview of the status of OBI and emphasize the clinical importance of OBI.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation recipients with hepatitis in the antiviral therapy era: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

The use of organs from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)+ donors could increase the donor pool substantially. However, fulminant hepatic failure requiring urgent liver transplantation or resulting in death has been reported in recipients of HBsAg+ renal transplantation (KT) in pre-nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) era. With effective antiviral therapies such as NAs, it seems feasible to transplant such recipients more safely. To address this issue, we conducted a retrospective, cohort study to evaluate the safety and long-term risks of HBsAg+ KT recipients in the NA era.

METHODS

From December 2006 to January 2013, 112 patients undergoing KT were followed at our institute. We analyzed patient and graft outcomes, hepatitis status (HBsAg status, hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA level, liver function tests, presence of hepatitis C virus [HCV] co-infection), and graft source (domestic or transplant tourism).

RESULTS

Ninety-two KT recipients were still alive. Nine patients were died of nonhepatic factors. Among 112 patients, there were 19 of 92 recipients alive who were HBsAg+, including 6 patients with HBV and HCV dual infections. Two of 19 patients experienced symptomatic hepatitis, one de novo and the other re-activation. Liver functions of these 2 recipients recovered progressively after introduction of NAs. No recipients in our study had experienced graft loss at the time of analysis.

CONCLUSION

In terms of patient survival and quality of life, KT seems be a safe and feasible therapy of choice for HBsAg+ patients with end-stage renal disease. Infection is easier to prevent than to treat. KT recipients at high risk for HBV reactivation and for complications of HBV, with or without HCV co-infection, may benefit from longer prophylaxis. However, the optimal duration of prophylaxis remains unclear. Furthermore, several issues needed to be solved for clinical concerns, such as frequency and intensity of adverse effects, high costs, increased pill burden, drug-drug interactions, and the emergence of viral resistance variants.

Donor-derived infection--the challenge for transplant safety

Unusual clinical syndromes or clusters of infections in recipients of organs from the same donor suggest donor-derived infection as a possible source of transmission

The incidence of transmission of unexpected infection by organ allografts is low, but precise data are lacking

Screening of donors for common pathogens involves both epidemiologic history and microbiological assays, and is highly effective for preventing the transmission of HIV and hepatitis B and C viruses

Donor screening for uncommon pathogens must be guided by knowledge of changes in the local epidemiology of infection

The key element in the detection of donor-derived infection is suspicion on the part of the clinicians caring for organ recipients

Application of newer microbiological techniques will increase the speed of donor screening and enhance transplant safety

Each year, over 70,000 organs are transplanted worldwide. The degree of risk of transmission of infection from transplanted organs to the recipient is largely unknown and is difficult to assess for specific organs. Here, Jay A. Fishman and Paolo A. Grossi describe the major risk factors for organ donor-derived transmission of infection and discuss opportunities to reduce the incidence of such events.

Organ transplantation, including of the heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, and small bowel, is considered the therapy of choice for end-stage organ failure. Each year, over 70,000 organs are implanted worldwide. One donor may provide multiple organs, as well as corneas and other tissues, for multiple recipients. The degree of risk for transmission of infection carried with grafts, notably of viruses, is largely unknown and, for a specific organ, difficult to assess. The approach to microbiological screening of organ donors varies with national and regional regulations and with the availability and performance of microbiological assays used for potential donors. Transmission of both expected or common, and unexpected infections has been observed in organ transplants, generally recognized after development of clusters of infections among recipients of organs from a common donor. Other than for unusual or catastrophic events, few data exist that define the incidence and manifestations of donor-derived infections or the ideal assays to use in screening to prevent such transmissions. Absolute prevention of the transmission of donor-derived infections in organ transplantation is not possible. However, improvements in screening technologies will enhance the safety of transplantation in the future.