Lamotrigine treatment of bipolar disorder: data from the first 500 patients in STEP-BD

Psychotropic drug use in perinatal women with bipolar disorder

Optimal dose management of psychotropic drugs during the perinatal period reduces the risk for recurrence of mood episodes in women with Bipolar Disorder. Physiological changes during pregnancy are associated with decreases in the plasma concentrations of the majority of mood stabilizing medications. Regular symptom and drug concentration monitoring for lithium and anticonvulsants with reflexive dose adjustment improves the probability of sustained symptom remission across pregnancy. The elimination clearance trajectory across pregnancy for psychotropics dictates the frequency of laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment. The literature on the pharmacokinetics of lithium, lamotrigine, carbamazepine and atypical antipsychotics during pregnancy and postpartum are reviewed, recommendations for symptom and laboratory monitoring are proposed and recommendations for dose adjustments are presented.

Pharmacologic treatments for pediatric bipolar disorder: a review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of literature has documented pediatric bipolar disorder to be a severely impairing form of psychopathology. However, concerns remain as to the inadequacy of the extant literature on its pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, treatment studies have not been systematically reviewed for treatment effects on core and associated symptoms. Thus, a systematic evaluation and synthesis of the available literature on the efficacy of antimanic pharmacotherapy for pediatric bipolar disorder on symptoms of mania, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was undertaken.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted through PubMed from 1989 through 2010 for open-label and randomized controlled trials published in English on the pharmacotherapy of pediatric mania.

RESULTS

There have been 46 open-label (n = 29) and randomized (n = 17) clinical trials of antimanic agents in pediatric bipolar disorder encompassing 2,666 subjects that evaluated a range of therapeutic agents, including traditional mood stabilizers, other anticonvulsants, second-generation antipsychotics, and naturopathic compounds. This literature has documented that the available armamentarium has different levels of efficacy in the treatment of pediatric mania. Because all psychotropic classes are associated with important adverse effects, a careful risk-benefit analysis is warranted when initiating pharmacologic treatment with any of these compounds. In the limited data available, the effects of antimanic agents on depression and symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have been, in general, modest. Few studies have evaluated the effects of antimanic agents in children younger than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial body of scientific literature has evaluated the safety and efficacy of various medicines and drug classes in the treatment of mania in pediatric bipolar disorder. More work is needed to assess the safety and efficacy of psychotropic drugs in children younger than 10 years, to further evaluate the efficacy of naturopathic compounds, and to further evaluate the effects of antimanic treatments for the management of depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

A prospective open-label trial of lamotrigine monotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lamotrigine monotherapy as an acute treatment of bipolar mood elevation in children with bipolar spectrum disorders.

METHOD

This was a 12-week, open-label, prospective trial of lamotrigine monotherapy to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of this compound in treating pediatric bipolar disorder. Assessments included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS), and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Adverse events were assessed through spontaneous self-reports, vital signs weight monitoring, and laboratory analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine children with bipolar disorder (YMRS at entry: 31.6 +/- 5.5) were enrolled in the study and 22 (56%) completed the 12-week trial. Lamotrigine was slowly titrated to an average endpoint dose of 160.7 +/- 128.3 in subjects <12 years of age (N = 22) and 219.1 +/- 172.2 mg/day in children 12-17 years of age (N = 17). Treatment with lamotrigine was associated with statistically significant levels of improvement in mean YMRS scores (-14.9 +/- 9.7, P < 0.001) at endpoint. Lamotrigine treatment also resulted in significant improvement in the severity of depressive, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and psychotic symptoms. Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated with marginal increase in body weight (47.0 +/- 18.0 kg vs. 47.2 +/- 17.9 kg, P= 0.6) and was not associated with abnormal changes in laboratory parameters. Several participants were discontinued due to skin rash; in all cases, the rash resolved shortly after discontinuation of treatment. No patient developed Steven Johnson syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Open-label lamotrigine treatment appears to be beneficial in the treatment of bipolar disorder and associated conditions in children. Future placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Venlafaxine monotherapy in bipolar type II depressed patients unresponsive to prior lithium monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

We examine the safety and efficacy of venlafaxine monotherapy in bipolar type II (BP II) patients with major depressive episode (MDE) who were unresponsive to prior lithium monotherapy. We hypothesized that venlafaxine would be superior to lithium with a low hypomanic conversion rate.

METHOD

Seventeen patients who were unresponsive to prior lithium monotherapy were crossed to venlafaxine monotherapy for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was within-subject change in total Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D) score over time. Secondary outcomes included the change in Young Mania Rating (YMRS) and clinical global impressions severity (CGI/S) and change (CGI/C) scores.

RESULTS

Venlafaxine produced significantly greater reductions in HAM-D (P < 0.0005), CGI/S (P < 0.0005), and CGI/C (P < 0.0005) scores vs. prior lithium. There was no difference in mean YMRS scores between treatment conditions (P = 0.179).

CONCLUSION

Venlafaxine monotherapy may be a safe and effective monotherapy of BP II MDE with a low hypomanic conversion rate in lithium non-responders.

Lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar depression: independent meta-analysis and meta-regression of individual patient data from five randomised trials

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar depressive episodes.

AIMS

To synthesise the evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar depressive episodes.

METHOD

Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials comparing lamotrigine with placebo.

RESULTS

Individual data from 1072 participants from five randomised controlled trials were obtained. More individuals treated with lamotrigine than placebo responded to treatment on both the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) (relative risk (RR)=1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.47, P=0.002) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (RR=1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.41, P=0.005). There was an interaction (P=0.04) by baseline severity of depression: lamotrigine was superior to placebo in people with HRSD score >24 (RR=1.47, 95% CI 1.16-1.87, P=0.001) but not in people with HRSD score < or =24 (RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.90-1.27, P=0.445).

CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent evidence that lamotrigine has a beneficial effect on depressive symptoms in the depressed phase of bipolar disorder. The overall pool effect was modest, although the advantage over placebo was larger in more severely depressed participants.

Venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy of rapid and non-rapid cycling patients with bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized, parallel group, open-label trial

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of controlled clinical data on the best initial therapy for treating patients with bipolar type II (BP II) major depressive episode (MDE). In this analysis, we examined the safety and antidepressant efficacy of short-term venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy in rapid and non-rapid cycling patients with BP II MDE. We hypothesized that lithium would have superior efficacy to venlafaxine, with fewer syndromal and sub-syndromal hypomanic and mixed mood conversions in the rapid cycling BP II MDE patients.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to monotherapy with either venlafaxine 37.5-375 mg daily or lithium 300-2100 mg daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D 28), with embedded 'typical' HAM-D 17 and 'atypical' HAM-D 17-R symptom scores. Secondary outcomes included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), clinical global impressions severity (CGI/S) and change (CGI/C) ratings, the proportion of responders (with > or =50% reduction in baseline HAM-D score) and remitters (with a final HAM-D score </=8), and the proportion of patients with syndromal and sub-syndromal mood conversions.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients received venlafaxine (12 rapid cycling) and 40 patients received lithium (15 rapid cycling): 48 (57.8%) were women and 69 (82.1%) were Caucasian. Thirty-three patients (39.8%) prematurely discontinued therapy: 11 for lack of efficacy, 13 for adverse events, 2 for non-compliance, and 7 who were lost to follow up. Venlafaxine produced a greater reduction in HAM-D 28 (p=0.001) and HAM-D 17 (p=0.002) scores (versus lithium) that was independent of cycling status (0.358). Venlafaxine also resulted in a higher rate of responders (p=0.021) and remitters (p=0.001) in rapid cycling patients. There was no significant difference in baseline mean YMRS scores, or mean YMRS change scores over time, between rapid and non-rapid cycling patients. Venlafaxine did not result in a higher proportion of mood conversions (versus lithium) in either the rapid or non-rapid cycling patients.

LIMITATIONS

This was a secondary analysis of rapid versus non-rapid cycling BP II MDE patients. The study was originally powered to detect differences in efficacy between treatment conditions, and was not specifically powered to detect differences in efficacy or mood conversion episodes between rapid and non-rapid cycling groups. We used a conservative life-time definition of rapid cycling (i.e., an average > or =4 affective episodes per year). We did not employ a patient-recorded daily chrono-record to identify ultra-short mood conversions. The study used a randomized, parallel group, open-label design.

CONCLUSION

These observations from this exploratory analysis suggest that venlafaxine monotherapy may be more effective than lithium monotherapy, with a similar mood conversion rate, in rapid and non-rapid cycling patients with BP II MDE. These data support prior observations that venlafaxine monotherapy may be effective initial treatment for BP II MDE.

Comparison of short-term venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy for bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized open-label study

OBJECTIVE

Practice guidelines for the initial treatment of bipolar II (BP II) major depressive episode (MDE) recommend mood stabilizer (MS) monotherapy or combined MS plus antidepressant drug (AD) therapy. We hypothesized that initial AD monotherapy would be superior to MS monotherapy for BP II MDE with a low hypomanic switch rate.

METHODS

Bipolar II MDE patients were randomized to a 12-week open-label treatment with either venlafaxine monotherapy (n = 43) or lithium carbonate monotherapy (n = 40). The primary outcome measure was the 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 28). The secondary outcome measures included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), clinical global impressions severity and change ratings, and the proportion of patients classified as responder (with > or = 50% reduction in baseline HAM-D score) or as remitter (final HAM-D score, < or = 8).

RESULTS

Thirty-four venlafaxine-treated patients (79.1%) and 15 lithium-treated patients (37.5%) completed the trial (P < 0.0005). Venlafaxine monotherapy produced a greater reduction in HAM-D 28 scores, with a difference in change of -6.57 points (95% confidence interval, -11.97 to -1.18) (P = 0.017) between treatment conditions. There was a greater proportion of venlafaxine-treated (vs lithium-treated) patients classified either as treatment responder (58.1% vs 20.0%; P < 0.0005) or as treatment remitter (44.2% vs 7.5%; P < 0.0005) for the HAM-D 28 scores. There was no significant increase in mean YMRS scores over time in the venlafaxine (vs lithium) treatment condition, and no significant increase in mean YMRS scores at any study visit compared with baseline for either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study suggest that AD monotherapy with venlafaxine may be an effective initial therapy for BP II MDE with a low hypomanic switch rate.

Bipolar depression: diagnostic and treatment considerations

Bipolar affective disorder is a recurrent, disabling, and potentially lethal illness that typically begins early in life. Although the disorder is defined by the manic and hypomanic episodes, for most people the depression episodes are the more virulent aspect of the illness. Specifically, the depressive episodes are more numerous, last longer, and are more difficult to treat than the manias, and depression is the principal cause of the illness's increased mortality due to suicide. For people with early-onset depression, predictors of subsequent bipolarity include a family history, psychotic features, and reverse neurovegetative features. Initial episodes of depression are commonly misdiagnosed, which often delays initiation of appropriate therapy and increases the likelihood of treatment with antidepressants alone. Unfortunately, the correct diagnosis is often not made until there has been a treatment-emergent affective switch. There are no treatments specifically approved for bipolar disorder in youth and, among antidepressants, only fluoxetine has received approved. When bipolarity is suspected, treatment with mood stabilizers, both conventional (i.e., lithium, valproate, and carbamazapine) and more recently classified (lamotrigine) and atypical antipsychotics should be prioritized. When antidepressants are indicated in combination with mood stabilizers, first choice options include bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Studies of adults indicate that several forms of focused psychotherapy may improve longer term outcomes.

Bipolar depression: issues in diagnosis and treatment

Although bipolar affective disorder is defined by the history of manic or hypomanic episodes, depression is arguably a more important facet of the illness. Depressive episodes, on average, are more numerous and last longer than manic or hypomanic episodes, and most suicides occur during these periods. Misdiagnosis of major depressive disorder delays initiation of appropriate therapy, further worsening prognosis. Distinguishing features of bipolar depression include earlier age of onset, a family history of bipolar disorder, presence of psychotic or reverse neurovegetative features, and antidepressant-induced switching. Bipolar I depressions should initially be treated with a mood stabilizer (carbamazapine, divalproex, lamotrigine, lithium, or an atypical antipsychotic); antidepressant monotherapy is contraindicated. More severe or "breakthrough" episodes often require a concomitant antidepressant, such as bupropion or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). The first treatment specifically approved for bipolar depression is a combination of the SSRI fluoxetine and the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. For refractory depressive episodes, venlafaxine, the monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine, and ECT are most widely recommended. The optimal duration of maintenance antidepressant therapy has not been established empirically and, until better evidence-based guidelines are established, should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Jaundice and hepatic enzyme induction during lamotrigine therapy in a bipolar II patient

Lamotrigine is a novel mood stabiliser as well as an anti-epileptic drug that has already been used for the prevention of convulsions. Despite several known side effects, hepatic dysfunction related to the drug has not been widely reported. A few cases have been observed in neurological, especially paediatric patients, but not in psychiatric patients. We report a case of cholestatis which occurred 6 weeks after starting lamotrigine therapy and which resolved after discontinuation, during the acute phase of disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of lamotrigine associated with cholestasis reported in patients with bipolar disorder.

Rapid cycling bipolar disorder: historical overview and focus on emerging treatments

OBJECTIVE

Rapid cycling bipolar disorder presents a significant challenge with respect to treatment. The cyclical nature of bipolar disorder has been well recognised for over a century, and following Dunner and Fieve's landmark paper in 1974, investigators have increasingly turned their attention to issues such as the definition of rapid cycling, demographic characterisation, treatment response and pharmacologic intervention.

METHODS

A literature search using Medline was performed, and selected articles which consider important developments in the definition, demographics and course of rapid cycling are reviewed. In addition, a systematic review of the literature published during the past 5 years (1999-2004) relating to treatment was conducted.

RESULTS

Relevant articles are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the important developments in our understanding of rapid cycling bipolar disorder, and focuses particularly on the recent literature regarding treatment.