Influence of intrathecal morphine and naloxone intervention on postoperative ventilatory regulation in elderly patients

Non-pulmonary complications of intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia for a range of operations. However, widespread implementation into clinical practice is hampered by concerns for potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with the primary objective of determining whether a threshold dose for non-pulmonary complications could be defined and whether an association could be established between dose and complication rates when intrathecal morphine is administered for perioperative or obstetric analgesia.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs control in patients undergoing any type of surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia, or women in labour. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention within the first 24 postoperative hours, analysed according to doses (1-100 μg; 101-200 μg; 201-500 μg; >500 μg), type of surgery, and anaesthetic strategy. Trials were excluded if doses were not specified.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 168 trials with 9917 patients. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention were significantly increased in the intrathecal morphine group, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.29-1.79), P<0.0001; 6.11 (5.25-7.10), P<0.0001; and 1.73 (1.17-2.56), P=0.005, respectively. Meta-regression could not establish an association between dose and rates of non-pulmonary complications. There was no subgroup difference according to surgery for any outcome. The quality of evidence was low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] system).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal morphine significantly increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention after surgery or labour in a dose-independent manner.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO (CRD42023387838).

The Role of Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty under Spinal Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine (ITM) for postoperative analgesia in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) under spinal anesthesia and to explore the dose-response relationship for analgesic efficacy or risk of side effects.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for any studies meeting the inclusion criteria. All the data were summarized using the random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the surgical procedure and dose of ITM. Meta-regression was used to explore the dose-response relationship.

RESULTS

Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. Compared with the placebo or blank control, ITM reduced the postoperative 24-h morphine consumption by 10.07 mg and prolonged the duration of analgesia. However, ITM significantly increased the risk of pruritus by 2.79 fold, with a tendency to increase the risk of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (P = 0.08). No difference was observed regarding the length of stay (LOS) and incidence of respiratory depression or urinary retention. Furthermore, meta-regression showed a linear dose-response relationship for the postoperative 24-h morphine consumption but no linear dose-response relationship for the risk of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding morphine to intrathecal anesthetics provides a prolonged and robust analgesic effect without significantly increasing the risk of side effects other than pruritus. Although we found a linear dose-response relationship for the postoperative 24-h morphine consumption, the optimal dose of ITM remains to be further explored in high-quality RCTs with a large sample size.

Ventilatory responses after major surgery and high dependency care

BACKGROUND

Disturbed breathing during sleep, with episodic upper airway obstruction, is frequent after major surgery. Ventilatory responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia during episodes of airway obstruction are difficult to investigate because the usual measure, that of ventilation, has been attenuated by the obstruction. We simulated the blood gas stimulus associated with obstruction to allow investigation of the responses.

METHODS

To assess ventilatory responses, we studied 19 patients, mean age 59 (19-79), first at discharge from high dependency care after major abdominal surgery and then at surgical review, ~6 weeks later. Exhaled gas was analysed and inspired gas adjusted to simulate changes that would occur during airway obstruction. Changes in ventilation were measured over the following 45-70 s. Studies were done from air breathing if possible, and also from an increased inspired oxygen concentration.

RESULTS

During simulated obstruction, hypercapnia developed similarly in all the test conditions. Arterial oxygen saturation decreased significantly more rapidly when the test was started from air breathing. The mean ventilatory response was 5.8 litre min(-2) starting from air breathing and 4.5 litre min(-2) with oxygen breathing. The values 6 weeks later were 5.9 and 4.3 litre min(-2), respectively (P=0.05, analysis of variance). There was no statistical difference between the responses starting from air and those on oxygen.

CONCLUSIONS

After major surgery, ventilatory responses to hypercapnia and hypoxaemia associated with airway obstruction are small and do not improve after 6 weeks. With air breathing, arterial oxygen desaturation during simulated rebreathing is substantial.

The effective duration of analgesia after intrathecal morphine in patients without additional opioid analgesia: a randomized double-blind multicentre study on orthopaedic patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To know whether the application of patient-controlled analgesia devices could be avoided if intrathecal morphine is given in combination with spinal anaesthesia.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind multicentre study, 188 orthopaedic patients were randomized to receive intrathecally placebo, 0.1 mg morphine or 0.2 mg morphine in addition to 15 mg bupivacaine. The primary outcome parameter was the number of patients without any additional request for opioid during a period of 72 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with 0.1 or 0.2 mg morphine showed a significant reduction in opioid requests compared with placebo during 72 h after surgery (P = 0.0001). At 24 h after surgery, the rate of patients who required additional opioid analgesia was 71% in the placebo group, 51% in the 0.1 mg morphine group and 31% of the patients in the 0.2 mg morphine group. After 0.2 mg morphine, systemic opioid requirements at 24 h were significantly lower than those in patients with 0.1 mg morphine (P < 0.05). Intrathecal morphine was not associated with an increased frequency of respiratory depression. Forty per cent of patients with intrathecal morphine did not ask for systemic opioids.

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal morphine in a dose of 0.1 and 0.2 mg provides effective analgesia for up to 48 h without any need for systemic opioids at all in many patients.

Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis

Intrathecal morphine is often used for postoperative analgesia after surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain more detailed information on the frequency of side-effects in patients receiving intrathecal morphine in combination with spinal anaesthesia compared with placebo treated patients. We clustered the analysis to patients receiving placebo, less than morphine 0.3 mg (M < 0.3), or equal to or more than morphine 0.3 mg (M > or = 0.3) and calculated the risk ratios of morphine vs placebo. Twenty-eight studies investigating 46 morphine groups vs placebo were included. A total of 790 patients with intrathecal morphine and 524 patients who received placebo were analysed. Compared with placebo the lower dose of morphine resulted in an increase of nausea (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), vomiting (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.4) and pruritus (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2). The higher dose resulted in an increased risk ratio for pruritus (RR 5.0, 95% CI 2.9-8.6), but not nausea (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.6) or vomiting (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9). Overall, intrathecal morphine did not increase respiratory depression. However, the higher dose of intrathecal morphine was associated with more episodes of respiratory depression (7/80) compared with the lower dose (2/247). Intrathecal morphine is associated with a mild increase in side-effects. With a dose < 0.3 mg we found there were no more episodes of respiratory depression than in placebo patients who received systemic opioid analgesia.

Respiratory depression after neuraxial opioids in the obstetric setting

Neuraxial opioids have contributed significantly to improved labor and postcesarean delivery analgesia. In the obstetric population, epidural and intrathecal opioids are associated with a very low risk of clinically significant respiratory depression. Although rare, respiratory depression is a serious risk; patients may die or suffer permanent brain damage as a consequence. This review discusses the mechanism and incidence, as well as the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression with morphine, extended-release epidural morphine, and lipophilic opioids in the labor and cesarean delivery setting.

Definitions of "respiratory depression" with intrathecal morphine postoperative analgesia: a review of the literature

PURPOSE

To review the postoperative intrathecal morphine (ITM) analgesia literature for their definitions of "respiratory depression" (RD).

SOURCE

Medline (1966 - June Week 5 2001) and reference lists were searched for original studies involving bolus-dose ITM for postoperative analgesia, which used "respiratory depression" or similar terms.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

The search identified 209 studies. These were included if ITM use was appropriate (bolus dose, postoperative analgesia) and the term "respiratory depression" was used, which left 96 studies remaining. Forty-four (46%) did not define "RD" despite using this term. A further 24 (25%) defined RD with respiratory rate (RR) alone. Only 28 (29%) defined RD with more than RR alone. There was no statistically significant association between the presence of a definition for RD with study design, study size or publication period. Also, no significant association existed between rigorousness of RD definitions and the above factors.

CONCLUSION

The term "respiratory depression" has no clear definition from a review of the literature on ITM use for postoperative analgesia. While defining RD with bradypnea is superior to having no definition, this is still inadequate. In future research, the consistent use of terms with specific meanings will facilitate understanding the true incidence of ITM's respiratory effects. If "respiratory depression" is used, then an explicit definition of its meaning should be provided. Future research must also address what is clinically significant respiratory impairment from intrathecal opioids, and how to optimally monitor for this. Further delineating their risks vs benefits will allow for more optimal dosing.

Pain management after major orthopaedic surgery: current strategies and new concepts

Several recently developed analgesic techniques effectively control pain after major orthopaedic surgery. Neuraxial analgesia provided by epidural and spinal administration of local anesthetics and opioids provides the highest level of pain control; however, such therapy is highly invasive and labor intensive. Neuraxial analgesia is contraindicated in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin. Continuous plexus and peripheral neural blockades offer excellent analgesia without the side effects associated with neuraxial and parenteral opioids. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia allows patients to titrate analgesics in amounts proportional to perceived pain stimulus and provide improved analgesic uniformity. Oral sustained-release opioids offer superior pain control and greater convenience than short-duration agents provide. Opioid dose requirements may be reduced by coadministration of COX-2-type nonsteroidal analgesics.

Cerebral embolization presenting as delayed, severe obtundation in the postanesthesia care unit after total hip arthroplasty

Catastrophic neurologic events occur rarely postoperatively and must be diagnosed quickly. A 63-year-old woman who had undergone uneventful total hip arthroplasty experienced obtundation after admission to the postanesthesia care unit. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple lesions consistent with ischemia or infarction, and fat cerebral embolism was diagnosed. We describe the numerous complications that may occur in patients in the postanesthesia care unit and review the differential diagnosis of altered mental status in such patients. Paradoxical cerebral fat embolization must be considered in the differential diagnosis of altered mental status after pelvic or long bone fracture or lower extremity major joint replacement, and this condition may occur despite normal pulmonary function and no patent foramen ovale or right-to-left intracardiac shunt. Magnetic resonance imaging with T2-weighted sequences is the cranial imaging study of choice for early evaluation of patients with sudden multifocal neurologic deficits and suspected fat embolism syndrome.

[Postoperative locoregional analgesia in the adult: epidural and peripheral techniques. Indications, adverse effects and monitoring]

Regional analgesia is a very effective way to treat postoperative pain. Lumbar and thoracic epidural analgesia are well adapted to major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Nevertheless, respiratory side effects induced by opioids are potentially severe and an adequate monitoring is essential. In orthopaedic surgery, perineural blocks are the best technique to manage postoperative pain and perineural catheters may be used. The importance of intra-articular analgesia, simple and safe, is not fully understood. The association of a local anaesthetic inducing a minor motor block and a strong sensitive block (bupivacaine, ropivacaine), with an opioid seems to be the best pharmacologic choice regarding quality of analgesia and safety. Benefits of postoperative regional analgesia on mortality and morbidity are not demonstrated. Medical and nursing staff and specialized units should improve quality of postoperative regional analgesia as well. General guidelines for the practice of regional anaesthesia must be closely followed.

Intrathecal administration of sameridine to patients subjected to arthroscopic knee joint surgery

BACKGROUND

Sameridine, a new substance with both local anesthetic and opioid effects, was administered intrathecally for the first time to humans, i.e. in patients subjected to arthroscopic knee joint surgery.

METHOD

A dose-escalating (10, 15, 20 and 25 mg), open study was performed in 33 patients. Only two patients were included in the 25 mg group.

RESULTS

Sameridine provided good quality of surgical anesthesia in all patients except those receiving 10 mg. The maximum level of sensory block, Th5-Th7, was reached within 30 min with a median duration of 3.6-3.9 h. The motor block was more profound with increasing dose, but never lasted longer than the sensory block. The influence on heart rate and blood pressure was minor and atropine and ephedrine were needed in four patients. No clinically significant ECG-changes were detected and no arrhythmias were recorded. Oxygen saturation and respiratory rate did not decrease in a clinically significant way and were not affected by concomitant morphine given i.v. postoperatively. There were few side-effects, the most frequent being mild pruritus (10/33).

CONCLUSION

Sameridine provided clinically adequate anesthesia for the patients receiving the doses of 15, 20 and 25 mg. Further studies are needed to evaluate the substance and it is of great interest to clinically investigate the opioid component with respect to postoperative analgesia.

Influence of halothane-diethyl-ether azeotrope and isoflurane on ventilation. Re-evaluation of an obsolete drug

The azeotropic mixture of halothane and diethyl-ether has been claimed to be a suitable anaesthetic agent for use during difficult conditions because of its negligible effect on circulation and ventilation. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of halothane-diethyl-ether azeotrope (HE) and isoflurane (ISO) on ventilation. 12 patients scheduled to undergo minor orthopaedic surgery and belonging to ASA 1, were randomly allocated to the HE group or the ISO group. Evaluation of resting ventilation and ventilation stimulated by hypercarbia and hypoxaemia was done on three occasions: (A) before anaesthesia, (B) after inhalational induction of anaesthesia and intubation without muscle relaxants when the level of anaesthesia was 1 MAC and (C) half an hour after operation and during recovery. Resting ventilation and the ventilatory response to hypercarbia during anaesthesia were maintained in the HE group but not in the ISO group, whereas the ventilatory response to hypoxaemia during anaesthesia was absent in both groups. The responses had returned to normal values in both groups during recovery. We conclude that halothane-diethyl-ether azeotrope is comparatively safe during anaesthesia with spontaneous breathing provided arterial oxygenation is adequate. This makes this azeotrope suitable for use by anaesthetists with limited experience and during difficult conditions such as civil disaster or war.