Propofol has anti-inflammatory effects on alveolar type II epithelial cells

Perioperative Inflammatory Response and Cancer Recurrence in Lung Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review

While surgical resection is the gold standard treatment for solid tumors, cancer recurrence after surgery is common. Immunosurveillance of remnant tumor cells is an important protective mechanism. Therefore, maintenance of anti-tumor cell activity and proper levels of inflammatory mediators is crucial. An increasing body of evidence suggests that surgery itself and perioperative interventions could affect these pathophysiological responses. Various factors, such as the extent of tissue injury, perioperative medications such as anesthetics and analgesics, and perioperative management including transfusions and methods of mechanical ventilation, modulate the inflammatory response in lung cancer surgery. This narrative review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in cancer recurrence after surgery and perioperative management related to cancer recurrence after lung cancer surgery.

Propofol ameliorates ischemic brain injury by blocking TLR4 pathway in mice

Ischemic brain injury is one of the most serious perioperative complications. However, effective preventative methods have not yet been established. This study aimed to investigate whether propofol has neuroprotective effects against ischemic brain injury, with a specific focus on Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Focal brain ischemia was induced via a combination of left common carotid artery occlusion and distal left middle cerebral artery coagulation in mice. Either propofol (10 mg/kg) or vehicle was intravenously injected 10 min prior to the induction of brain ischemia in wild-type and TLR4 knockout mice. Infarct volume, pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, inflammatory cell infiltration, and neurobehavioral function were assessed. Propofol administration significantly reduced infarct volume in wild-type mice (26.9 ± 2.7 vs 15.7 ± 2.0 mm³ at day 7), but not in TLR4 knockout mice. Compared with the control mice, the propofol-treated wild-type mice exhibited lower levels of IL-6 (0.57 ± 0.23 vs 1.00 ± 0.39 at 24 h), and smaller numbers of TLR4-expressing microglia in the penumbra (11.7 ± 3.1 vs 25.1 ± 4.7 cells/0.1 mm²). In conclusion, propofol administration prior to ischemic brain insult attenuated brain injury by blocking the TLR4-dependent pathway and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine production.

Propofol Affects EGF's Activity in Intestinal Cell by Down-Regulating EGFR-Mediated Intracellular Signaling

Propofol is a commonly used anesthetic drug in clinic. In recent years, a series of non-anesthetic effects of propofol have been discovered. Studies have shown that propofol has many effects on the intestine. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is one of the most important growth factors that could regulate intestinal growth and development. In the current study, we studied the effect of protocol on the biological activity of EGF on intestinal tissue and cell models. Through flow cytometry, indirect immunofluorescence and Western-blot and other technologies, it was found that propofol reduced the activity of EGF on intestinal cells, which inhibited EGF-induced intestinal cell proliferation and changed the cell behavior of EGF. To further explore the potential mechanism by which propofol down-regulated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-induced signaling, we carried out a series of related experiments, and found that propofol may inhibit the proliferation of intestinal cells by inhibiting the EGFR-mediated intracellular signaling pathway. The current research will lay the theoretical and experimental basis for further study of the effect of propofol on the intestine.

Propofol reduces acute lung injury by up-regulating gamma-aminobutyric acid type a receptors

BACKGROUND

We used a two-hit lung injury rat model that involves mechanical ventilation (MV) following lipopolysaccharide exposure to investigate the effects of propofol on the expression of GABA_A receptors (GABA_AR) and cytokine responses, and we then determined the specific effects of GABA on cytokine responses in vitro in alveolar epithelial cells (AECs).

METHODS

Forty-eight adult male Wister rats were equally and randomly divided into the following 4 groups (n = 12) using a random number table: sham group, sham+propofol group, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + VILI group, and LPS + VILI + propofol group. All animals were anesthetized, and the animals received a 3.75 mg/kg intratracheal instillation of endotoxins or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as the control, as described previously. After 30 min, rats were ventilated for 5 h in a volume-controlled ventilation mode. In the LPS + VILI group, animals were ventilated with a tidal volume (Vt) of 22 ml/kg and zero positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at a respiratory rate of 16-18 breaths/min, whereas control (sham) rats were ventilated with a Vt of 6 ml/kg and PEEP of 5 cmH₂O at a rate of 45-55 breaths/min. The FiO₂ remained constant as 0.4, propofol was administered intravenously in the LPS + VILI + propofol and sham + propofol groups at a rate of 10 mg·kg^-1·h^-1 while normal saline at the same rate was intravenously administered in the LPS + VILI and sham groups during the entire mechanical ventilation period. Five hours after mechanical ventilation, the rats were killed. Survival rates, histopathology, concentrations of inflammatory mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), wet weight/dry weight (W/D) ratio of the lung, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in lung tissues, and expression of GAD and GABA_AR by immunohistochemical detection and Western blotting were assessed. Then, human type II-like alveolar epithelial cells (A549 cells) were cultured to full confluence and incubated with GABA (100 nM) alone, picrotoxin alone, a GABA_AR antagonist (PTX, 50 nM), or GABA + PTX for 10 min, followed by stimulation with LPS (control) at 100 ng/ml for 4 h. The concentrations of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, and IL-10 were then measured.

RESULTS

Administration of propofol in a two-hit lung injury rat model can increase survival rates and the expression of GAD and GABA_AR (P < .05). The administration of propofol can attenuate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines both in vivo and in vitro, and the administration of propofol can attenuate histopathological changes, the W/D ratio, and MPO activity (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that the administration of propofol improved lung function, alleviated lung injury, and up-regulated the GAD and GABA_AR expressions in a two-hit model of acute lung injury (ALI) characterized by intratracheal instillation of an endotoxin and prolonged MV. Therefore, the protective effects of propofol may be associated with the up-regulation of GABA_A receptors in AECs.

Comparing Postoperative Complications and Inflammatory Markers Using Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Gas Anesthesia for Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

Objectives

The objective of this study is to evaluate postoperative complications and inflammatory profiles when using a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or volatile gas-opioid (VO) based anesthesia in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery.

Methods

Design, retrospective propensity score matched cohort; Setting, major academic cancer hospital; Patients, all patients who had pancreatic surgery between November 2011 and August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matched patient pairs were formed. A total of 134 patients were included for analysis with 67 matched pairs; Interventions, Patients were categorized according to type of anesthetic used (TIVA or VO). Patients in the TIVA group received preoperative celecoxib, tramadol, and pregabalin in addition to intraoperative TIVA with propofol, lidocaine, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine. The VO-group received a volatile-opioid based anesthetic; Measurements, demographic, perioperative clinical data, platelet lymphocyte ratios, and neutrophil lymphocyte ratios were collected. Complications were graded and collected prospectively and later reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Patients receiving TIVA were more likely to have no complication or a lower grade complication than the VO-group (P = 0.014). There were no differences in LOS or postoperative inflammatory profiles noted between the TIVA and VO groups.

Conclusions

In this retrospective matched analysis of patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery, TIVA was associated with lower grade postoperative complications. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative inflammatory profiles were not significantly different.

Nobiletin improves propofol-induced neuroprotection via regulating Akt/mTOR and TLR 4/NF-κB signaling in ischemic brain injury in rats

BACKGROUND

Stroke is regarded as one of the main health concerns globally, presenting with high mortality and morbidity rates. Cerebral ischemic damage and infarction are critically associated with stroke. Various mechanisms related to inflammation, oxidative stress and excitotoxicity are found to be involved in ischemic damage. Very short time period for treatment has necessitated in development of more effective neuroprotective agents. Study aimed in investigated the effects of nobiletin on experimentally induced ischemic brain injury and also to assess whether nobiletin potentiated the neuroprotective effects of propofol.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Induction of cerebral infarction and I/R was done by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Nobiletin (100 or 200mg/kg b.wt.) was intragastrically administered to rats for 9 days before ischemia induction and on the day of induction nobiletin was administered an hour prior. Separate group of rats were post-conditioned with propofol (50mg/kg/h; i.v.) for 30min following 24h of reperfusion.

RESULTS

Propofol post-conditioning either with or without administration of nobiletin prior I/R injury attenuated pulmonary edema, neuronal apoptosis and reduced cerebral infarct volume. Overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) and nitric oxide following I/R were reduced. Propofol either alone or with prior nobiletin treatment had down-regulated TLR4 and TLR4-mediated NF-κB signaling and caused activation of Akt/mTOR cascade.

CONCLUSION

Propofol post-conditioning either with nobiletin prior I/R injury was found to be more effective than propofol alone, suggesting the positive effects of nobiletin on propofol-mediated anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects.

Effect of propofol on generation of inflammatory mediator of monocytes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of propofol with different concentrations on the expression of inflammatory mediators of interleukin and tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) by stimulating the mouse primary monocytes and human monocytic cell line with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and also discuss the effect of propofol on the secretion of inflammatory mediator and its possible molecular mechanism.

METHODS

The mononuclear cells of mouse spleen were separated and then purified to obtain the primary monocytes. The dose-effect relationship of production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by monocytes which were stimulated by LPS, namely the monocytes were stimulated by the dose of 0-500 ng/mL for 24 h. ELISA was employed to detect the concentration of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α. The effect of propofol on the secretion of above pro-inflammatory cytokines by the monocytes was observed. Cells were divided into the control group, the 0.1% DMSO group, the LPS group and the treatment group with LPS + different dose of propofol (propofol 1-100 μg/mL). ELISA was employed to detect the concentration of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α. The change in the expression of important signaling molecules in Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signaling pathway was detected after THP-1 cells were treated with propofol.

RESULTS

The concentration of TNF-α was (3863 ± 153) pg/mL after 12 h of stimulation by LPS and then its concentration was decreased gradually. But the concentration of IL-6 and IL-8 was relatively high after 24 h of stimulation by LPS, (5627 ± 330) pg/mL and (1626 ± 200) pg/mL, respectively. The propofol could inhibit the expression of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α caused by LPS. After the intervention treatment of 50 μg/mL propofol, the concentration of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α was significantly decreased (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The propofol can inhibit the expression of TLR-4 and NF-κB to inhibit the activation of p38 and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Effects of anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol on the cytokine/chemokine production at the airway epithelium during esophagectomy

Post-operative pulmonary complications such as pneumonia, acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are closely associated with morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. One lung ventilation (OLV) is commonly used during esophagectomy. However, the effect of the anesthetic agents on the inflammatory response induced by OLV has yet to be evaluated, particularly during esophagectomy, which causes several complications in the lung. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of anesthetic agents, such as sevoflurane or propofol, on the inflammatory reactions at the airway. Twenty patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomized to receive either sevoflurane (n=10) or propofol (n=10) as a main anesthetic agent. Epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was obtained from ventilated‑dependent lung (DL) and collapsed non-dependent lung (NDL) by a bronchoscopic microsampling method. The levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokine [tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-12p70] in the ELF were measured using multiplexed bead-based immunoassays before and after OLV. The results indicated that the levels of IL-6 in ELF were significantly increased in both the ventilated DL and collapsed NDL after OLV compared with the levels prior to OLV in the sevoflurane group. By contrast, there was no significant change in the IL-6 levels in the propofol group in the ventilated DL and collapsed NDL before and after OLV. Similarly, IL-8 levels were markedly increased in the ventilated DL and collapsed NDL after OLV compared with those before OLV in the sevoflurane group, whereas there was no significant change in IL-8 levels in the propofol group in the ventilated DL and collapsed NDL before and after OLV. In contrast to the changes in IL-6 and IL-8 levels, levels of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, were not obviously changed in both the ventilated DL and collapsed NDL before and after OLV in the sevoflurane group. However, IL-10 levels in the propofol group were increased in the ventilated DL and collapsed NDL after OLV compared with those before OLV. Of note, the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-12p70 in ELF were below the detection limits. These observations suggested that propofol anesthesia more potently suppresses the surgical stress-induced inflammatory perturbation at the local milieu of the airway during esophagectomy compared with sevoflurane anesthesia.

Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the inflammatory response and pulmonary function of perioperative patients with one-lung ventilation

This study compared the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the inflammatory response and pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer during the perioperative period. Forty patients who underwent a selective resection of the inferior lobe of the left lung were randomly divided into two groups, with one group anesthetized with sevoflurane and the other with propofol (groups S and P, respectively). Radial arterial and mixed venous blood were extracted for blood gas analysis, in order to calculate the alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (PA-aDO₂), respiratory index (RI) and pulmonary shunt ratio (Qs/Qt) prior to the induction of anesthesia (T₀), prior to one-lung ventilation (OLV) (T₁), 1 h subsequent to the commencement of OLV (T₂), 1 h following restoration of two-lung ventilation (T₃), 2 h following restoration of two-lung ventilation (T₄) and 24 h post-surgery (T₅). In addition, blood was extracted from the radial artery at T₀, T₁, T₂, T₃, T₄ and T₅ in order to detect the presence of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-6 and IL-10 in the blood serum. Between T₁ and T_4, the tidal volume, airway plateau pressure and end-expiratory positive airway pressure were recorded, in order to calculate the lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn). Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output and the duration of OLV (OLV-T) were recorded at T_0–5. Compared with T0, the levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 significantly increased during T₂ to T₄ in both groups (P<0.05). PA-aDO₂ and RI increased during T₁ to T₄, and Qs/Qt increased at T₂ (P<0.05). Compared with T₁, Cdyn decreased during T₂ to T₄ in the S group, whereas Cdyn was reduced at T₂ in the P group (P<0.05). Compared with the P group, TNF-α level increased and IL-10 decreased at T₃ and T₄ in the S group. PA-aDO₂ and RI increased, but Cdyn decreased at T₂ and T₃ in the S group. Qs/Qt increased at T₂ in the S group. The results of the present study demonstrated that, in comparison with propofol, sevoflurane exhibited an enhanced capacity to aggravate injury to pulmonary function during the perioperative stages. This occurred via the release of inflammatory factors, the aggravation of lung edema and the inhibition of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.

Propofol inhibits hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced human gastric epithelial cell injury by suppressing the Toll-like receptor 4 pathway

This study aimed to investigate the role of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathway in normal human gastric epithelial (GES-1) cells under hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) in vitro, and the effect of propofol on injured GES-1 cells as well as its possible mechanism. Before H/R induction, GES-1 cells were preconditioned with fat emulsion, propofol, or epigallocatechin gallate. Then cell viability, cell apoptosis, and related molecules in the cells were analyzed under experimental conditions. We found that propofol 50 μmol/L markedly inhibited the H/R injury under hypoxia 1.5 h/reoxygenation 2 hours by promoting GES-1 cell viability and decreasing cell apoptosis. The TLR4 signal may be involved in the protective effect of propofol against H/R injury. The malondialdehyde contents and superoxide dismutase activities were recovered under propofol preconditioning. In summary, propofol preconditioning may exert a protective effect on H/R injury in GES-1 cells and the mechanism may be via inhibition of the activated TLR4 signal under H/R conditions.

Propofol exerts anti-inflammatory effects in rats with lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by inhibition of CD14 and TLR4 expression

We investigated the effect of propofol (Prop) administration (10 mg kg-1 h-1, intravenously) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung injury and its effect on cluster of differentiation (CD) 14 and Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 expression in lung tissue of anesthetized, ventilated rats. Twenty-four male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups of 8 rats each: control, LPS, and LPS+Prop. Lung injury was assayed via blood gas analysis and lung histology, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels were determined in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using ELISA. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect CD14 and TLR4 mRNA levels, and CD14 and TLR4 protein expression was determined by Western blot. The pathological scores were 1.2 ± 0.9, 3.3 ± 1.1, and 1.9 ± 1.0 for the control, LPS, and LPS+Prop groups, respectively, with statistically significant differences between control and LPS groups (P < 0.05) and between LPS and LPS+Prop groups (P < 0.05). The administration of LPS resulted in a significant increase in TNF-α and IL-1β levels, 7- and 3.5-fold, respectively (P < 0.05), while treatment with propofol partially blunted the secretion of both cytokines (P < 0.05). CD14 and TLR4 mRNA levels were increased in the LPS group (1.48 ± 0.05 and 1.26 ± 0.03, respectively) compared to the control group (1.00 ± 0.20 and 1.00 ± 0.02, respectively; P < 0.05), while propofol treatment blunted this effect (1.16 ± 0.05 and 1.12 ± 0.05, respectively; P < 0.05). Both CD14 and TLR4 protein levels were elevated in the LPS group compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while propofol treatment partially decreased the expression of CD14 and TLR4 protein versus LPS alone (P < 0.05). Our study indicates that propofol prevents lung injury, most likely by inhibition of CD14 and TLR4 expression.

Neuroprotective effects of pretreatment with propofol in LPS-induced BV-2 microglia cells: role of TLR4 and GSK-3β

Surgery often leads to neuroinflammation, which mainly acts as the activation of microglia cells. Propofol is always used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia prior to surgical trauma, whereas whether or not it could attenuate neuroinflammation used prophylactically is not well defined. In the present study, we incubated BV-2 microglia cells with 1 μg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to mimic neuroinflammation in vitro. Firstly, cell viability was measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the data indicated that propofol would not reduce cell viability unless its concentration reached 300 μM. Secondly, BV-2 microglia cells were pretreated with 30 μM propofol (clinically relevant concentration), and then stimulated with LPS. The results showed that the production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-10 was considerably increased by LPS, but the change could be markedly attenuated by pretreatment with propofol. Meanwhile, pretreatment with propofol inhibited LPS-induced augmentation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression at both mRNA and protein levels and further upregulated LPS-induced inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) in BV-2 microglia cells. These results indicated, at least in part, that pretreatment with propofol can protect BV-2 microglia cells against LPS-induced inflammation. Downregulation of TLR4 expression and inactivation of GSK-3β may be involved in its protective effect.

Influence of propofol and volatile anaesthetics on the inflammatory response in the ventilated lung

BACKGROUND

The immunomodulatory effects of volatile anaesthetics in vitro and the protective effect of propofol in lung injury spurred us to study the effects of volatile anaesthetics and propofol on lung tissue in vivo.

METHODS

Twenty-seven pigs were randomized to 4-h general anaesthesia with propofol (8 mg/kg/h, group P, n=9), sevoflurane [minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)=1.0, group S, n=9) or desflurane (MAC=1.0, group D, n=9). Four healthy animals served as the no-ventilation group. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was obtained to measure the cell counts, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AcH), phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Lung tissues were evaluated histologically and for caspase-3 expression.

RESULTS

Volatile anaesthetics reduced PAF-AcH levels without affecting PLA(2) activity and resulted in decreased alveolar macrophage and increased lymphocyte counts in BALF (sevoflurane: 29 ± 23%; desflurane: 26 ± 6%, both P<0.05 compared with 4 ± 2% in the no-ventilation group). These findings were accompanied by atelectasis and inflammatory cells' infiltration in the inhalational anaesthetics groups. Also, sevoflurane reduced SOD activity and both sevoflurane and desflurane induced significant caspase-3 expression. In contrast, propofol resulted in a minor degree of inflammation and preserved BALF cells' composition without triggering apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Halogenated anaesthetics seem to trigger an immune lymphocytic response in the lung, inducing significant apoptosis and impairment of PAF-AcH. In contrast, propofol preserves anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant defences during mechanical ventilation, thus preventing the emergence of apoptosis.

Anesthetic propofol reduces endotoxic inflammation by inhibiting reactive oxygen species-regulated Akt/IKKβ/NF-κB signaling

BACKGROUND

Anesthetic propofol has immunomodulatory effects, particularly in the area of anti-inflammation. Bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces inflammation through toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 signaling. We investigated the molecular actions of propofol against LPS/TLR4-induced inflammatory activation in murine RAW264.7 macrophages.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Non-cytotoxic levels of propofol reduced LPS-induced inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and NO as determined by western blotting and the Griess reaction, respectively. Propofol also reduced the production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-10 as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Western blot analysis showed propofol inhibited LPS-induced activation and phosphorylation of IKKβ (Ser180) and nuclear factor (NF)-κB (Ser536); the subsequent nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 was also reduced. Additionally, propofol inhibited LPS-induced Akt activation and phosphorylation (Ser473) partly by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation; inter-regulation that ROS regulated Akt followed by NF-κB activation was found to be crucial for LPS-induced inflammatory responses in macrophages. An in vivo study using C57BL/6 mice also demonstrated the anti-inflammatory properties against LPS in peritoneal macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that propofol reduces LPS-induced inflammatory responses in macrophages by inhibiting the interconnected ROS/Akt/IKKβ/NF-κB signaling pathways.