Tissue-specific distribution of DNA-binding nuclear proteins

Simultaneous exposure to estrogen and androgen resulted in feminization and endocrine disruption

Estrogen, which is synthesized earlier in females than androgen in males, is critical for sex determination in non-mammalian vertebrates. However, it remains unknown that what would happen to the gonadal phenotype if estrogen and androgen were administrated simultaneously. In this study, XY and XX tilapia fry were treated with the same dose of 17α-methyltestosterone (MT) and 17β-estradiol (E2) alone and in combination from 0 to 30 days after hatching. Treatment of XY fish with E2 resulted in male to female sex reversal, while treatment of XX fish with MT resulted in female to male sex reversal. In contrast, simultaneous treatment of XX and XY fish with MT and E2 resulted in female, but with cyp11b2 and cyp19a1a co-expressed in the ovary. Serum 11-ketotestosteron level of the MT and E2 simultaneously treated XX and XY female was similar to that of the XY control, while serum E2 level of these two groups was similar to that of the XX control. Transcriptomic cluster analysis revealed that the MT and E2 treated XX and XY gonads clustered into the same branch with the XX control. However a small fraction of genes, which showed disordered expression, may be associated with stress response. These results demonstrated that estrogen could maintain the female phenotype of XX fish and feminize XY fish even in the presence of androgen. Simultaneous treatment with estrogen and androgen up-regulated the endogenous estrogen and androgen synthesis, and resulted in disordered gene expression and endocrine disruption in tilapia.

Conversion of iris epithelial cells as a model of differentiation control

It has been shown that, upon lentectomy or in culture, iris epithelial cells (IECs) of adult newts become converted into lens cells, and this conversion is the basic event of lens regeneration in newts. Whether in situ or in cell culture, the conversion requires the passage of a specific number of cell cycles. The progeny of IECs which fails to traverse this cell-cycle number redifferentiates as IECs in situ. The passage through cell cycles of IECs is associated with progressive alterations of cytoplasm and cell surface, during which the original state of differentiation disappears (dedifferentiation). It is speculated that the altered state of cells caused by proliferation leads to the appearance of factors which interact with the genome and switch the gene activation pattern to that of the lens cell. In this model, developmental controls are geared to the cell-cycle progression and not directly to the activation of lens-characteristic genes. A number of points are raised which speak against the long-held idea that a factor from neural retina induces lens differentiation in IECs. It is proposed that the retinal factor plays the role of growth factor which is essential in the conversion in situ, but not required in the conversion in cell culture. The proposed model is compared with reprogramming of differentiation of some cell lines by cytidine analogs and with ontogenic systems of differentiation control.