Cavocaval liver transplantation without venovenous bypass and without temporary portocaval shunting: the ideal technique for adult liver grafting?

Venovenous bypass in adult liver transplant recipients: A single-center observational case series

BACKGROUND

Very little information is currently available on the use and outcomes of venovenous bypass (VVB) in liver transplantation (LT) in adults in Australia. In this study, we explored the indications, intraoperative course, and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent VVB in a high-volume LT unit.

METHODS

The study was a single-center, retrospective observational case series of adult patients who underwent VVB during LT at Austin Health in Melbourne, Australia between March 2008 and March 2022. Information on baseline preoperative status and intraoperative variables, including specific VVB characteristics as well as postoperative and VVB-related complications was collected. The lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays as well as intraoperative and in-hospital mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 900 LTs performed at this center during the aforementioned 14-year period, 27 (3%) included a VVB procedure. VVB was performed electively in 16 of these 27 patients (59.3%) and as a rescue technique to control massive bleeding in the other 11 (40.1%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of those who underwent VVB procedures was 48 (39-55) years; the median age was 56 (47-62) years in the non-VVB group (p<0.0001). The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were similar between the two patient groups. Complete blood data was available for 622 non-VVB patients. Twenty-six VVB (96.3%) and 603 non-VVB (96.9%) patients required intraoperative blood transfusions. The median (IQR) number of units of packed red blood cells transfused was 7 (4.8-12.5) units in the VVB group compared to 3.0 units (1.0-6.0) in the non-VVB group (p<0.0001). Inpatient mortality was 18.5% and 1.1% for the VVB and non-VVB groups, respectively (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay or incidence of acute kidney injury, primary graft dysfunction, or long-term graft failure between the two groups. Patients in the VVB group experienced a higher rate of postoperative non-anastomotic biliary stricture compared to patients in the non-VVB group (33% and 7.9%, respectively; p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

VVB continues to play a vital role in LT. This case series highlights the heightened risk of major complications linked to VVB. However, the global transition to selective use of VVB underscores the urgent need for collaborative multi-center studies designed to address outstanding questions and parameters related to the safe implementation of this procedure.

Comparison of the modified piggyback with standard piggyback and conventional orthotopic liver transplantation techniques: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In conventional orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), the recipient's retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) is completely clamped and replaced with the donor IVC. The piggyback technique has been used to preserve venous return, either via an end-to-side or standard piggyback (SPB), or via a side-to-side or modified piggyback (MPB) anastomosis, using a venous cuff from the recipient hepatic veins with partially clamping and preserves the recipient's inferior vena cava. However, whether these piggyback techniques improve the efficacy of OLT is unclear. To address the low quality of the available evidence, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of conventional, MPB, and SPB techniques.

METHODS

Literature was searched in Medline and Web of Science databases for relevant articles published until 2021 without any time restriction. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes of conventional OLT, MPB, and SPB techniques.

RESULTS

Forty studies were included, comprising 10,238 patients. MPB and SPB had significantly shorter operation times and fewer transfusions of red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma than conventional techniques. However, there were no differences between MPB and SPB in operation time and blood product transfusion. There were also no differences in primary non-function, retransplantation, portal vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury, renal dysfunction, venous outflow complications, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, 90-day mortality rate, and graft survival between the three techniques.

CONCLUSION

MBP and SBP techniques reduce the operation time and need for blood transfusion compared with conventional OLT, but postoperative outcomes are similar. This indicates that all techniques can be implemented based on the experience and policy of the transplant center.

Understanding Local Hemodynamic Changes After Liver Transplant: Different Entities or Simply Different Sides to the Same Coin?

Liver transplantation is an extremely complex procedure performed in an extremely complex patient. With a successful technique and acceptable long-term survival, a new challenge arose: overcoming donor shortage. Thus, living donor liver transplant and other techniques were developed. Aiming for donor safety, many liver transplant units attempted to push the viable limits in terms of size, retrieving smaller and smaller grafts for adult recipients. With these smaller grafts came numerous problems, concepts, and definitions. The spotlight is now aimed at the mirage of hemodynamic changes derived from the recipients prior alterations. This article focuses on the numerous hemodynamic syndromes, their definitions, causes, and management and interconnection with each other. The aim is to aid the physician in their recognition and treatment to improve liver transplantation success.

Outcomes in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients Using Pediatric Deceased Donor Liver Grafts

Background.

The use of pediatric grafts for liver transplantation (LT) into adult recipients is rare, and reported outcomes are conflicting. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes in adult recipients following LT with grafts from deceased pediatric donors.

Methods.

A retrospective study identifying adult LT between 2010 and 2020 using pediatric deceased donor liver grafts was conducted. Adults undergoing LT with deceased donor pediatric grafts (age ≤ 12) were identified and matched 1:2 with adults receiving adult grafts (age ≥ 18) based on recipient age (±10 y), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at transplant (±5 points) and etiology of liver disease. To assess real liver size differences between the pediatric-donor and adult-donor groups, patients receiving a graft from a donor between 13 and 17 y were excluded from the main analysis and studied independently. Outcomes between the groups were compared. Complication rates were identified and graded using Clavien–Dindo classification. Graft and patient survival were assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves.

Results.

Twelve adult LT recipients with whole liver grafts from deceased pediatric donors were matched with 24 adult recipients of adult donors. Recipient age and MELD score were similar between groups. Recipients of pediatric grafts were more likely to be female (66.7% versus 16.7%, P = 0.007) and leaner (body mass index = 24.4 versus 29.9, P = 0.013). Alcohol-related cirrhosis was the most prevalent liver disease etiology in both groups (P = 0.96). There was no significant difference in length of stay, readmissions, early complications, or major complications between groups. Vascular and biliary complication rates were similar. Actuarial graft and patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 y were 100/100/100 versus 96/96/96 (P = 0.48).

Conclusions.

Excellent patient and graft survival is achievable with LT using young pediatric deceased donor grafts in smaller adult recipients. Outcomes are comparable with recipients of age and MELD-matched adult donors. Careful donor MELD-score recipient matching and close monitoring for potential biliary and vascular complications are crucial to achieve acceptable outcomes.

Complex Liver Transplantation Using Venovenous Bypass With an Atypical Placement of the Portal Vein Cannula

In liver transplantation (LT) medical literature, venovenous bypass (VVB) with the interposition of a venous graft attached to the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) or to the splenic vein (SV) has not been reported previously. Here, we report the decompression of the portomesenteric compartment in 2 patients with complex cases of orthotopic LT. A femoroaxillary percutaneous VVB was installed prior to abdominal opening to decompress massive collateral veins in the abdominal wall. In the first patient, the IMV was connected to a donor vein graft with a lateroterminal anastomosis, and the distal part of the vein graft was cannulated and connected to the VVB. In the second patient, because of the excessive size of the spleen, it was necessary to perform a splenectomy to gain sufficient space in the abdomen to implant the new liver. The SV was connected to a donor vein graft with a terminoterminal anastomosis, and the distal part of the vein graft was cannulated and connected to the VVB. In both patients, the decompression of the portomesenteric compartment was crucial to reduce portal hypertension and to access the hepatic hilum, where the dissection was very complex due to previous major surgeries. In conclusion, VVB with the interposition of a venous graft attached to the IMV or to the SV during LT is a safe and simple technique, and it may be useful for patients needing VVB with no standard access to the portal compartment, particularly in the case of severe portal hypertension and re-LTs.

Temporary portal decompression during liver transplantation: a video review of the different techniques

PURPOSE

Temporary portal decompression (TPD) during liver transplantation (LT) remains a divisive technical issue in the liver transplant community. In this video-based article, we show the technical details of the different techniques used for TPD during LT.

METHODS

An early portal section, before liver mobilization, should be preferred in order to achieve hepatectomy of a totally devascularized liver. Portal decompression can be achieved through direct right portocaval shunts and indirect portosystemic shunts (i.e., mesentericosaphenous and portosaphenous shunts).

RESULTS

The preference for direct portocaval or indirect portosystemic shunts is tailored on patients and anatomical characteristics. Each of these three techniques presents specific indications, limitations, and advantages.

CONCLUSION

TPD during LT can be achieved through different techniques that aim to facilitate the recipient hepatectomy, reduce the blood loss, and maintain hemodynamic stability.

Temporary Right Portocaval Shunt During Piggyback Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

During piggyback liver transplantation (LT), a temporary end-to-side portocaval anastomosis (PCA) facilitates native total hepatectomy while maintaining hemodynamic stability. Some argue that PCA, performed on the main portal trunk (PT), might shorten the main portal vein and could cause technical difficulties during LT. We describe a temporary PCA performed on the right portal vein (R-PCA).

METHODS

The technique entails complete dissection of the main portal trunk up its right and left branches. After having ligated the left portal vein, the right is anastomosed end-to-side to the anterior face of the inferior vena cava. Taken down of R-PCA, before graft-recipient portal vein anastomosis, is achieved by stapling or suturing.

RESULTS

An R-PCA has been performed in 14 over 15 planned procedures at our unit. In one case, because of intraoperative difficulties the PCA was performed on the PT.

CONCLUSIONS

A temporary R-PCA represents a feasible alternative method of portal decompression during LT. Its use can be implemented into the technical armamentarium of transplant surgeons.

Piggyback or Cava Replacement: Which Implantation Technique Protects Liver Recipients From Acute Kidney Injury and Complications?

The cava-preserving piggyback (PB) technique requires only partial cava clamping during the anhepatic phase in liver transplantation (LT) and, therefore, maintains venous return and may hemodynamically stabilize the recipient. Hence, it is an ongoing debate whether PB implantation is more protective from acute kidney injury (AKI) after LT when compared with a classic cava replacement (CR) technique. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of AKI and other complications after LT comparing both transplant techniques without the use of venovenous bypass. We retrospectively analyzed the adult donation after brain death LT cohort between 2008 and 2016 at our center. Liver and kidney function and general outcomes including complications were assessed. Overall 378 transplantations were analyzed, of which 177 (46.8%) were performed as PB and 201 (53.2%) as CR technique. AKI occurred equally often in both groups. Transient renal replacement therapy was required in 22.6% and 22.4% comparing the PB and CR techniques (P = 0.81). Further outcome parameters including the complication rate were similar in both cohorts. Five-year graft and patient survival were comparable between the groups with 81% and 85%, respectively (P = 0.48; P = 0.58). In conclusion, both liver implantation techniques are equal in terms of kidney function and overall complications following LT.

Patent foramen ovale in liver transplant recipients does not negatively impact short-term outcomes

AIM

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common atrial septal defect that is largely asymptomatic and often undiagnosed. The impact of a PFO in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the impact of PFO and physiologic intrapulmonary shunt (IPS) on the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent LT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, intention-to-treat analysis of patients with PFO and controls without PFO who underwent LT at Mayo Clinic in Florida between 2008 and 2013. Patients with physiologic IPS were also analyzed. The cohorts were compared for baseline characteristics, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), postoperative oxygen requirements, 30-d cerebrovascular accidents, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 935 patients who underwent LT, 10.4% had proven PFO by pre-LT echocardiogram. Control patients (n = 101) were statistically older than PFO and IPS (n = 56) patients, but similar in sex, BMI, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, and left ventricular ejection fraction. PFO and IPS patients had similar length of stay in the ICU, mechanical ventilation times, post-LT oxygen requirements, and 30-d mortality compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed similar outcomes for large PFO and IPS patients to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of PFO did not have a negative impact on perioperative LT outcomes.

Caval reconstruction techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation

There are several caval reconstruction techniques currently in use for orthotopic liver transplantation. These include caval replacement or the conventional technique, performed with or without venovenous bypass, piggyback technique with anastomosis with two or three hepatic veins with or without cavotomy and modifications of the piggyback technique including end-to-side and side-to-side cavocaval anastomosis. There are few randomized controlled trials comparing the use of these techniques and our knowledge of their comparability is based on a few multi- and many single-center retrospective and prospective reviews. Although there are advantages and disadvantages for each technique, it is advisable that the surgeon perform the technique with which they have the most the experience and at which they are the most skilled as excellent outcomes can be obtained with any of the caval reconstruction options discussed.

Different cava reconstruction techniques in liver transplantation: piggyback versus cava resection

BACKGROUND

Originally, cava reconstruction (CR) in liver transplantation meant complete resection and reinsertion of the donor cava. Alternatively, preservation of the recipients inferior vena cava (IVC) with side-to-side anastomosis (known as "piggyback") can be performed. Here, partial clamping maintains blood flow of the IVC, which may improve cardiovascular stability, reduce blood loss and stabilize kidney function. The aim of this study was to compare both techniques with particular focus on kidney function.

METHODS

A series of 414 patients who had had adult liver transplantations (2006-2009) were included. Among them, 176 (42.5%) patients had piggyback and 238 had classical CR operation, 112 (27.1%) of the patients underwent CR accompanied with veno-venous bypass (CR-B) and 126 (30.4%) without a bypass. The choice of either technique was based on the surgeons' individual preference. Kidney function [serum creatinine, calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), RIFLE stages] was assessed over 14 days.

RESULTS

Lab-MELD scores were significantly higher in CR-B (22.5+/-11.0) than in CR (17.3+/-9.0) and piggyback (18.8+/-10.0) (P=0.008). Unexpectedly, the incidences of arterial stenoses (P=0.045) and biliary leaks (P=0.042) were significantly increased in piggyback. Preoperative serum creatinine levels were the highest in CR-B [1.45+/-1.17 vs 1.25+/-0.85 (piggyback) and 1.13+/-0.60 mg/dL (CR); P=0.033]. Although a worsening of postoperative kidney function was observed among all groups, this was most pronounced in CR-B [creatinine day 14: 1.67+/-1.40 vs 1.35+/-0.96 (piggyback) and 1.45+/-1.03 mg/dL (CR); P=0.102]. Accordingly, the proportion of patients displaying RIFLE stages ≥2 was the highest in CR/CR-B (26%/19%) when compared to piggyback (18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Piggyback revealed a shorter warm ischemic time, a reduced blood loss, and a decreased risk of acute kidney failure. Thus, piggyback is a useful technique, which should be applied in standard procedures. When piggyback is unfeasible, cava replacement, which displayed a lower incidence of vascular and biliary complications in our study, remains as a safe alternative.

Conventional versus piggyback techniques: do they have different outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Conventional orthotopic liver transplant includes resection of the recipient's native liver, together with the retrohepatic inferior vena cava, whereas with the piggyback technique, the recipient's vena cava is preserved and the donor's vena cava is anastomosed with the recipient's hepatic veins. So the caval flow is maintained during explantation, but on the other hand, the cava must be dissected completely from the liver, prolonging hepatic excision.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of conventional versus piggyback techniques. Primary outcomes were serious adverse events or complications, and secondary outcomes were graft survival for 3 and 12 months, quality of life, days in the intensive care unit and in the hospital, and days spent receiving mechanical ventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 3, 2007, to December 31, 2008, 120 liver transplant patients were divided into 2 groups: conventional (n = 93) and piggyback (n = 27).

RESULTS

Intraoperative and postoperative complications, graft survival for 3 and 12 months, quality of life, and hospital stay did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, the stay in the intensive care unit (median, 2 vs 3 days; range, 1-101 vs 1-60 days) and the number of days on ventilatory support (median, 1 vs 2 days; range, 0-41 vs 1-60 days) were notably lower in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

The conventional liver transplant technique had significantly better results than the piggyback technique in terms of length of stay in the intensive care unit and duration of mechanical ventilation.

Side-to-side cavocavostomy in adult piggyback liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to perform a retrospective study that described the anastomosis technique as well as the complications of side-to-side cavo-caval reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 1998 to April 2011, we performed 284 liver transplantations including 10 adults with live donor organs. In all cases but 2 (272), cavo-caval reconstruction was performed using side-to-side cavo-caval (STSCC) anastomosis. In 19 cases (6.9%), we also carried out an end-to-side temporary porto-caval shunt (TPCS). In 17 cases (6.2%) the technique was performed for retransplantation.

RESULTS

STSCC anastomosis was technically feasible in all but 2 cases, regardless of the recipient's vena cava, anatomic factors, or graft size. Mean operative time for the STSCC was 13 minutes (range, 6-25). Routine Doppler ultrasonography was performed intraoperatively at the end of the surgery. There was no case of cava stump thrombosis. Complications associated with this technique were limited to 2 patients. One complication was torsion due to donor graft/recipient mismatch, which was successfully treated surgically by falciform ligament fixation. The second complication was only evident by sinusoidal congestion and was managed nonoperatively. Seventeen cases were uneventful for retransplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

STSCC during piggyback liver transplantation is safe and can be performed in the retransplantation setting, with a low incidence of venous outflow obstruction that can be associated with the traditional piggyback technique. Our data suggest that donor graft to recipient mismatch is not an absolute contraindication when proper body size match is considered. A wide anastomosis with typical recipient hepatic vein inclusion is warranted with routine postanastomotic Doppler ultrasonography.

Orthotopic liver transplantation without venovenous bypass using the conventional and piggyback techniques

INTRODUCTION

Orthotopic liver transplantation is a widely used procedure for the treatment of irreversible liver diseases for which there is no possibility of medical treatment. When this procedure is performed by the conventional technique, the retrohepatic vena cava is removed along with the native liver. The inferior vena cava (IVC) remains clamped until the revascularization of the graft, and in this period there is a reduction in the venous return, which may induce a fall by up to 50% in the cardiac output with hemodynamic instability and a fall in renal perfusion pressure. The use of a portal-femoral-axillary venovenous bypass system, in which the blood from the femoral and portal veins returns to the heart via the axillary vein propelled by a centrifugal pump, is intended to minimize the effects of the IVC clamping. In the piggyback (PB) technique, the native liver is removed and the IVC of the recipient is preserved and only partially clamped. We have employed both techniques without the use of venovenous bypass for 10 years. The objective of this study was to compare the results obtained from the use of the two techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 195 patients transplanted between 1999 and 2008: 125 by the conventional technique and 70, the PB technique. The intraoperative parameters were analyzed (surgical time, ischemia time, use of blood products, and diuresis), as well as intensive care support (duration of stay in intensive care unit and use of vasoactive drugs), period of intubation, length of hospital stay, renal function, graft function, postoperative complications, retransplantation, and patient survival.

RESULTS

The PB group showed a reduction in surgical time, warm ischemia time, the use of packed red blood cells concentrates, and fresh frozen plasma, as well as mortality at 30 days (P<.05). There were no differences in relation to cold ischemia time, intraoperative diuresis; length of stay and use of vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit; the period of intubation; the duration of hospital stay; the renal function; the graft function; the need for reoperation; the incidence of sepsis, biliary complications, vascular complications; need for retransplantation; and 1-year mortality. The cumulative survival rate at 1 year was significantly better among the PB patients.

CONCLUSION

Orthotopic liver transplantation can be performed without venovenous bypass with good results, using either the conventional technique or the PB technique. Provided that there is no technical contraindication and a long ischemia period is not foreseen, the PB technique should be the technique of choice.

Successful liver transplantation for Rendu-Weber-Osler disease, a single centre experience

BACKROUNDS/PURPOSE: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia or Rendu-Weber-Osler is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder characterized by arteriovenous malformations and telangiectasia that may affect the nose, skin, lungs, brain and gastrointestinal tract. Liver involvement of the disease has been described to be responsible of biliary tract necrosis, high cardiac output and portal hypertension, due to intra-hepatic vascular shunts. We aimed to present four cases of successful orthotopic liver transplantations in this indication performing our modified Piggy-back technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2002 and 2008, four patients have been diagnosed for Rendu-Weber-Osler disease and underwent liver transplantation. Three of them suffered from high cardiac output with heart failure, two presented HBV infection and one patient suffered from renal failure requiring a liver-kidney transplantation. We performed our modified Piggy-back technique for liver implantation, which consists to clamp selectively the hepatic veins during the hepatectomy, without venous bypass, the retro-hepatic vena cava is preserved.

RESULTS

No hemodynamic concerns disturbed the surgery and no massive transfusions were needed. The liver replacement corrected the cardiac insufficiency due to high cardiac output for the three patients. At present, the four patients are getting well.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite new advances in immunotherapy for the medical treatment of Rendu-Weber-Osler disease, liver transplantation remains the curative option for hepatic based-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

The beneficial impact of temporary porto-caval shunt in orthotopic liver transplantation: a single center analysis

The use of temporary porto-caval shunt (TPCS) has been shown to improve hemodynamic stability and renal function in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We evaluated the impact of TPCS in OLT and analyzed the differences according to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), donor risk index (DRI) and D-MELD. This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 148 consecutive OLT. Fifty-eight OLT were performed using TPCS and 90 without TPCS. Donor and recipient data with pre-OLT, intraoperative and postoperative variables were reviewed. Overall graft survival was 89.9% at 3 months and 81.7% at 1 year. Graft survival at 3 months and 1 year was 93.1% and 79.2%, respectively, in TPCS group versus 85.6% and 82.2%, respectively, in non-TPCS group (P = NS). Intraoperative packed red blood cells requirement was lower in TPCS group (7.5 ± 5.8 vs. 12.2 ± 14.2, P = 0.006) and non-TPCS group required higher intraoperative total dose of phenylephrine (16% vs. 28%, P = 0.04). TPCS group had lower 30-day postoperative mortality (1.7% vs. 10%, P = 0.04), no difference was observed at 90 days. Graft survival was lower in patients with high DRI; in this group graft loss was higher at 1 month (25% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.005) and 3 months (25% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.005) when TPCS was not used. TPCS improves perioperative outcome, this being more evident when high-risk grafts are placed into high-risk patients.

Comparison of surgical methods in liver transplantation: retrohepatic caval resection with venovenous bypass (VVB) versus piggyback (PB) with VVB versus PB without VVB

Use of piggyback technique (PB) and elimination of venovenous bypass (VVB) have been advocated in adult liver transplantation (LT). However, individual contribution of these two modifications on clinical outcomes has not been fully investigated. We performed a retrospective review of 426 LTs within a 3-year period, when three different surgical techniques were employed per the surgeons' preference: retrohepatic caval resection with VVB (RCR+VVB) in 104 patients, PB with VVB (PB+VVB) in 148, and PB without VVB (PB-Only) in 174. The primary outcomes were intraoperative blood transfusion and the patient and graft survivals. Demographic profiles were similar, except younger recipient age in RCR+VVB and fewer number of grafts with cold ischemic time over 16 h in PB-Only. PB-Only required lesser intraoperative red blood cells (P=0.006), fresh frozen plasma (P=0.005), and cell saver return (P=0.007); had less incidence of acute renal failure (P=0.001), better patient survival (P=0.039), and graft survival (P=0.003). The benefits of PB+VVB were only found in shortened total surgical time (P=0.0001) and warm ischemic time (P=0.0001), and less incidence of acute renal failure (P=0.001) than RCR+VVB. PB-Only method seemed to provide the best clinical outcome. The benefit of PB was not fully achieved when it was used with VVB.

Vascular complications following adult piggyback liver transplantation with end-to-side cavo-cavostomy: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications remain a significant cause of morbidity, graft loss, and mortality following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). These problems predominantly include hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis or stenosis. Venous outflow obstruction may be specifically related to the technique of piggyback OLT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2002 and February 2009, we performed 200 piggyback OLT in 190 recipients. A temporary portacaval shunt was created in 44 (22%) cases, whereas end-to-side cavo-cavostomy was routinely performed for graft implantation. Pre-existent partial portal or superior mesenteric vein thrombosis was present in 17 (12%) cirrhotics in whom we successfully performed eversion thrombectomy, which was followed by a typical end-to-end portal anastomosis. The donor hepatic artery was anastomosed to the recipient aorta via an iliac interposition graft in 31 (16%) patients.

RESULTS

The 14 (7%) vascular complications included hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 5), hepatic artery stenosis (n = 3), aortic/celiac trunk rupture (n = 2), portal vein stenosis (n = 2), and isolated left and middle hepatic venous outflow obstruction (n = 1). There was also 1 case of arterial steal syndrome via the splenic artery. No patient experienced portal or mesenteric vein thrombosis. Therapeutic modalities included re-OLT, arterial/aortic reconstruction and splenic artery ligation. Vascular complications resulted in death of 5 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Our experience indicated that piggyback OLT with an end-to-side cavo-cavostomy showed a low risk of venous outflow obstruction. Partial portal or mesenteric vein thrombosis is no longer an obstacle to OLT; it can be successfully managed with the eversion thrombectomy technique.

Liver donor's age and recipient's serum creatinine predict blood component use during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Excessive use of blood components during liver transplantation should be avoided because it has been associated with poor outcomes and it may stress blood bank resources.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To determine preoperative predictors of excessive transfusion requirements in patients undergoing liver transplantation, the clinical records of 126 consecutive adult patients undergoing primary liver transplantation were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome variables included number of red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and plateletpheresis components intraoperatively transfused. Univariate analyses of the following predictor variables were performed: recipient age, sex, ethnicity, height/weight, Model for End Stage Liver Disease score, year of transplant, previous abdominal surgery, hepatoma, wait-list time, standard recipient laboratory values obtained immediately before transplantation, cold ischemia time, donor age, sex, and height/weight. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to build a model that best predicted how many blood components should be available before transplant.

RESULTS

Donor age of more than 50 years old (odds ratio [OR], 2.8 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-6.0), and recipient serum creatinine (SCr) level of more than 1.3 mg/dL (OR, 3.8 95% CI, 1.6-8.9) were the only variables found to be predictive of RBC use in multivariate analysis. This model accurately predicted the use of more than 10 units of RBCs 79% of cases. Having both adverse factors present resulted in using more than one box in 80% of cases as compared to 44% of cases where only one or no adverse factor was present (p = 0.002). Further analyses showed a direct correlation between the number of RBCs transfused and plasma (r = 0.93) and plateletpheresis components (r = 0.74) transfused. [Corrections added after online publication 22-Jul-2009: OR updated from 3.8 to 2.8; CI from 1.6-8.9 to 1.3-6.0; OR from 2.8-3.8.]

CONCLUSION

Liver donor's age and recipient's SCr are important in preoperatively predicting blood use during liver transplantation.

A single-center experience of 500 liver transplants using the modified piggyback technique by Belghiti

Over the past 4 decades, the surgical techniques of liver transplantation (LTx) have permanently evolved and been modified. Among these, the modified piggyback (MPB) technique by Belghiti offers specific advantages. The objective of this study was to present our single-center experience with the MPB technique in 500 cases. Recipients' perioperative data were prospectively collected and evaluated. Postoperative and specific complications, stay in the intensive and intermediate care unit, and the mortality rate with cause of death were analyzed. Most recipients were classified as Child C (49.1%). For the patients who underwent LTx for the first time, alcoholic (23.9%) and viral (22.2%) cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (15.1%) were the prevalent indications. The overall median warm ischemia time, anastomosis duration, and operative time were 45, 108, and 320 minutes, respectively. The median intraoperative blood loss was 1500 mL. A venovenous bypass was never needed to maintain hemodynamic stability. Only in a few cases was temporary inferior vena cava clamping necessary. Most prominent surgical complications were hemorrhage, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Renal failure occurred in 6.2% of patients. The overall median stay in the intensive and intermediate care unit was 14 days. The mortality rates within 30 and 90 days were 6.3% and 13.3%, respectively. No technique-related death occurred. The MPB technique by Belghiti is a feasible and simple LTx technique. The caval flow is preserved during the anhepatic phase, and this minimizes the need for venovenous bypass or portocaval shunt. This technique requires only 1 caval anastomosis, which is easy to perform with a short anhepatic phase. To minimize the risk of outflow obstruction, attention should be paid by doing a wide cavocavostomy cranially to the donor inferior vena cava in a door-lock manner. This technique can be applied in almost all patients undergoing LTx for the first time and liver retransplantation as well.

Temporary porto-caval shunt utility during orthotopic liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

In liver transplantation (OLT) a porto-caval shunt is a well-defined technique practiced by many surgeons in several centers.

METHODS

We considered 186 cadaveric OLT patients who underwent a cavo-cavostomy-type reconstruction; they were divided into two groups: those in whom we performed a porto-caval shunt (group A) and those in whose we did not (group B). We evaluated several variables: warm and total ischemia time, intraoperative blood and fresh frozen plasma transfusions, crystalloid and colloid requirements, blood loss, operative duration, hemodynamic intraoperative changes and diuresis, length of hospital stay, and creatinine values at days 1 and 2, and at discharge day.

RESULTS

Total and warm ischemic time differed significantly between the two groups. Infusion of blood, fresh frozen plasma, colloid, and crystalloid did not significantly differ. Blood loss was lower, and intraoperative diuresis was not significantly increased in group A subjects. Postoperative hospitalizations were 16.5 and 17.8 days and operative times, 504 and 611 minutes in the two groups. Both cardiac index and ejection fraction values during the anhepatic phase were significantly greater among group A than group B patients. PAD at the two phases was greater in group B. The PAS was significantly different only at reperfusion time. Creatinine values were significantly different at discharge. Better survival was shown for group A patients over group B subjects.

CONCLUSION

The results presented herein confirmed that a porto-caval shunt during OLT was a safe, useful expedient contributing to an improved hemodynamic status and a better time distribution in the various phases of liver transplantation.

The need for venovenous bypass in liver transplantation

Since introduction of the conventional liver transplantation (CLTx) by Starzl, which was based on the resection of recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) along the liver, the procedure has undergone several refinements. Successful use of venovenous bypass (VVB) was first introduced by Shaw et al., although in recent decades there has been controversy regarding the routine use of VVB during CLTx. With development of piggyback liver transplantation (PLTx), the use of caval clamping and VVB is avoided, leading to fewer complications related to VVB. However, some authors still advocate VVB in PLTx. The great diversity among centers in their use of VVB during CLTx, or even along the PLTx technique, has led to confusion regarding the indication setting for VVB. For this reason, we present an overview of the use of VVB in CLTx, the target of patients for whom VVB could be beneficial, and the needs assessment of VVB for patients undergoing PLTx. Recent studies have shown that with the advancement of surgical skills, refinement of surgical techniques, and improvements in anesthesiology, there are only limited indications for doing CLTx with VVB routinely. PLTx with preservation of IVC can be performed in almost all primary transplants and in the majority of re-transplantations without the need for VVB. Nevertheless, in a few selective cases with severe intra-operative hemodynamic instability, or with a failed test of transient IVC occlusion, the application of VVB is still justifiable. These indications should be judged intra-operatively and the decision is based on each center's preference.

Piggyback technique in adult orthotopic liver transplantation: an analysis of 1067 liver transplants at a single center

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in adult patients has traditionally been performed using conventional caval reconstruction technique (CV) with veno-venous bypass. Recently, the piggyback technique (PB) without veno-venous bypass has begun to be widely used. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of routine use of PB on OLTs in adult patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 1067 orthotopic cadaveric whole liver transplantations in adult patients treated between June 1994 and July 2001. PB was used as the routine procedure. Patient demographics, factors including cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), operative time, transfusions, blood loss, and postoperative results were assessed. The effects of clinical factors on graft survival were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.In all, 918 transplantations (86%) were performed with PB. Blood transfusion, WIT, and usage of veno-venous bypass were less with PB. Seventy-five (8.3%) cases with PB had refractory ascites following OLT (p=NS). Five venous outflow stenosis cases (0.54%) with PB were noted (p=NS). The liver and renal function during the postoperative periods was similar. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85%, 78%, and 72% with PB. Univariate analysis showed that cava reconstruction method, CIT, WIT, amount of transfusion, length of hospital stay, donor age, and tumor presence were significant factors influencing graft survival. Multivariate analysis further reinforced the fact that CIT, donor age, amount of transfusion, and hospital stay were prognostic factors for graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

PB can be performed safely in the majority of adult OLTs. Results of OLT with PB are as same as for CV. Liver function, renal function, morbidity, mortality, and patient and graft survival are similar to CV. However, amount of transfusion, WIT, and use of veno-venous bypass are less with PB.

Caval Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation: Prospective Experience of Verona Liver Transplantation Program

Caval anastomosis in liver transplantation has been modified to avoid outflow complications. Classic cava replacement is rarely indicated; most liver transplantation teams use a piggy-back (PB) technique. At the start of our liver transplantation program, we opted for a latero-lateral (L-L) caval anastomosis. In our prospective experience, the L-L caval anastamosis was safe and feasible in all 24 adult patients. No vascular complications occurred. Graft and patient survival rates were both 96% at 11 months follow-up.

Orthotopic Liver Transplantation With Vena Cava Preservation in Cirrhotic Patients: Is Systematic Temporary Portacaval Anastomosis a Justified Procedure?

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the peri- and postoperative effects of the lack of a temporary portocaval anastomosis (TPCA) during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in 84 patients with cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1996 to December 2002, 156 liver transplant recipients included (54%; 60 men and 24 women) of mean age 52 +/- 9 years with portal hypertension. In whom peri- and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median fall in mean arterial pressure upon vascular clamping and unclampings was 20 mm Hg (range 15 to 75), while the median duration of portal vein clamping was 77 minutes. The median amount of blood autotransfusion was 1100 mL (range 0 to 5400). The median number of red blood cell and fresh-frozen plasma units transfused were 5 and 6.5, respectively. The median intraoperative urinary output was 72 mL/h (range 11 to 221). Three patients (3.5%) presented a perioperative complication, but no perioperative death was observed. Six patients experienced an early postoperative complication (<10 days): five hemodynamic complications and one transient renal failure, which did not require hemodialysis. One patient (1%) died at 12 hours after OLT from acute pulmonary edema.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that systematic TPCA during OLT with preservation of the native retrohepatic vena cava in cirrhotic patients does not appear to be justified. In contrast, peri- and postoperative hemodynamic parameters as well as blood component requirements were comparable to those of the literature reporting OLT with straightforward TPCA.

Transplante de fígado: resultados iniciais

OBJETIVO: Apresentar os resultados iniciais de um serviço de transplante hepático que utiliza a técnica piggyback como padrão. MÉTODO: Análise retrospectiva de 19 transplantes de fígado enfatizando as complicações pós-operatórias e a taxa de sobrevida dos pacientes. A indicação mais freqüente de transplante foi cirrose pelo vírus C em nove pacientes (47%). De acordo com a gravidade da doença hepática, nove casos (47,3%) foram classificados como Child C e oito (42%) como B. Os dois casos restantes foram hepatite fulminante e trombose tardia de artéria hepática. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados 19 transplantes em 18 pacientes com doador cadáver empregando a técnica com preservação da veia cava (piggyback) em 100% dos casos. A indicação mais freqüente de transplante foi cirrose pelo virus C em nove pacientes (47%). De acordo com a gravidade da doença hepática nove casos (47,3%) foram classificados como Child C e oito (42%) como B. Os dois casos restantes foram hepatite fulminante e trombose tardia de artéria hepática. A idade média foi de 45,6 anos. O tempo de isquemia fria do enxerto foi em média de 7,8 horas e a permanência hospitalar média de 18 dias. As complicações mais freqüentes foram as biliares (21%), sendo que três pacientes necessitaram de reoperação e um foi tratado por endoscopia. Houve dois casos de trombose tardia de artéria hepática, sendo um deles tratado por retransplante. Houve um óbito (5,2%) no 8o dia de pós-operatório ocasionado por disfunção primária do enxerto. A sobrevida inicial maior que 30 dias foi de 94,7%. CONCLUSÕES: É possível ter bons resultados no início de um programa de transplante de fígado, desde que haja uma técnica padronizada e uma equipe bem treinada e envolvida com as complicações pós-operatórias.

New concepts in organ transplantation

Over the past several decades, many factors have led to higher rates of patient and graft survival in organ transplantation. These factors include enhanced immunosuppressants available in recent years such as Neoral, Prograf, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies. In addition, other new drugs, such as FTY 720, FK 778, anti-CD20, anti-CD40, and anti-CH52 monoclonal antibodies, are now being tested in clinical studies. Furthermore, there have been advances in surgical techniques, such as the piggyback method without venovenous bypass, side-to-side anastomosis of the hepatic veins, use of vascular staplers, biliary duct-to-duct anastomosis with or without tube drainage, microsurgical hepatic artery anastomosis and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Finally, better patient and donor selection criteria with regard to HBV- and HCV-seropositive donors, diabetic donors, donors with malignancies, older donors, ABO-incompatible donors, and non-heart-beating donors have been combined with optimal timing of transplantation, better options for treating early surgical and late medical complications, and improved management in intensive-care units. Other noteworthy scientific and social development are on the horizon namely genetic advances in xenografting and cell transplantation, and induction of immunologic tolerance. This article reviews the current developments that have significantly improved graft and patient survival among solid-organ transplants.

Massive gastrointestinal bleeding complicating portal vein cross-clamping during liver transplantation

This case report describes the occurrence of massive upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage immediately after cross-clamping of the inferior vena cava and hepatic portal vein. This case suggests that acute intraoperative hemorrhage from a varix should always be a consideration before liver transplantation in patients who have a history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

IMPLICATIONS

A case of severe bleeding during liver transplantation is described in a patient who had a history of bleeding from the stomach before surgery. The importance of understanding surgical options and the ability to provide rapid massive transfusion in the management of this complication are discussed.

Perioperative cytokines during orthotopic liver transplantation without venovenous bypass

Since most of studies investigating cytokine levels during human orthotopic liver transplantation used venovenous bypass (VVB), it may be difficult to distinguish between the increase in proinflammatory mediators induced by VVB, by ischemia-reperfusion injury or by splanchnic venous congestion in the anhepatic phase. The goal of this investigation was to assess the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble interleukin-2 receptors (sIL-2r) during OLT procedures routinely performed without VVB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients underwent OLT with cross clamping of the inferior caval vein without VVB. Soluble IL-2r concentrations were measured by means of luminescence enzyme immunometric assay and IL-6 by means of a sequential immunometric assay. Time points (TP) of sampling were before induction of anesthesia (TP1), after cross-clamping of the inferior vena cava (TP2), 15 minutes after reperfusion (TP3), and 24 hours after the transplant procedure (TP4).

RESULTS

Soluble IL-2r increased significantly 24 hours after transplantation (P =.02) compared to TP1, TP2, and TP3. IL-6 increased significantly during the anhepatic period (TP2 vs TP1, P =.003) and again in the reperfusion period (TP2 vs TP3, P =.002). Twenty-four hours after surgery IL-6 declined significantly (TP3 vs TP4, P =.001), but remained significantly higher (P = 0.04) compared to TP1. Furthermore, we examined the relative changes (DeltaTP %) in perioperative levels of cytokines compared with those previously published in studies using VVB. We observed higher values of DeltaTP % of IL-6 in TP2 and TP4 among our group of patient without VVB. The data on sIL-2r were similar, suggesting no major effects of the operative technique on sIL-2r levels.

CONCLUSION

The two interleukins showed different perioperative trends. Our data suggest that cross clamping contributes more to cell activation, namely, increased release of IL-6 in the anhepatic phase than the use of VVB. However, no major differences were observed during the reperfusion period. The extent of clinical effect on graft function of higher IL-6 levels in the anhepatic period among recipients not supported with VVB remains to be clarified.

Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The original method of liver transplantation (LT) included recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and the use of extracorporeal venovenous bypass (VVB). Refinements in technique permit transplantation to be done with IVC preservation and without VVB use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between November 1993 and November 2000, 202 consecutive grafts were performed in 188 adults (>/=16 years of age). Twelve patients (6.4%) received two and three retransplants (re-LT). Split grafting was performed 19 times (19 of 202 grafts, 9.4%). Risk factors included United Network of Organ Sharing status I (n=30, 16%), previous right upper abdominal surgery (n=32, 17.1%), caudate lobe encirclement of IVC (n=65, 32.2%), IVC (n=24, 11.9%), and splanchnic venous modification (n=58, 30.9%), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (n=34, 16.8%), giant (>5 kg) liver tumor (n=6, 3%), septic necrosis of the caudate lobe (n=1, 0.5%), and previous cavocaval (n=13, 6.4%) or classical LT (n=5, 2.5%).

RESULTS

IVC preservation, avoidance of IVC cross clamping and of VVB use were possible in 98.9%, 93%, and 99.5% of 183 primary LT and in 89.5%, 84.2%, and 89.5% of 19 re-LT. Temporary portocaval shunting was never applied. Perioperative mortality was 1.2%. There was no allotransfusion in 73 (36%) grafts and 45 (22%) patients were immediately extubated. Permanent hepatic vein and caval problems were encountered in three (1.5%) grafts. One patient needed stent placement to treat IVC stenosis. Actual 3- and 12-month patient survival for whole, re-LT, and right-lobe split LT groups were 94.7%, 94.1%, 94.7%, 88.2%, 94.1%, and 89%. Three-month graft survival rates for these groups were 92.6%, 94.7%, and 84.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

LT with IVC preservation and without VVB use and portocaval shunting is possible in nearly all primary transplants and in the majority of re-LT.

Suprahepatic venacavaplasty (cavaplasty) with retrohepatic cava extension in liver transplantation: experience with first 115 cases

BACKGROUND

We first introduced the orthotopic liver transplantation utilizing cavaplasty technique in 1994. This paper describes the surgical technique and assesses the outcome of the cavaplasty OLT.

METHODS

The cavaplasty procedure was used in 115 consecutive orthotopic liver transplantations, including six left lateral and two right lobe transplantations, between November 1994 and September 2000. Fifty-three (66.3%) transplantations required femoro-axillary veno-venous bypass in the initial 4 years, whereas only eight (22.9%) needed VB in the subsequent 2 years. Conversion to piggyback or standard technique was not necessary in any patient.

RESULTS

Median results are as follows: operative time 4.5 hr, warm ischemia time 25 min, and blood transfused (packed red blood cells) 6 units. These findings did not differ between first transplantation and retransplantation. There were no perioperative deaths related to the cavaplasty technique. No hepatic venous outflow obstruction was observed, including living-related OLTs. No patient required postoperative hemodialysis for acute renal failure. The median intensive care and hospital stays were 2 days and 10 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cavaplasty technique requires no retrocaval, hepatic vein, or short hepatic vein dissection, and the inferior vena cava can be preserved, which provides advantages for hepatectomy and easy hemostasis, especially during retransplantation. The wide-open triangular caval anastomosis is easy to perform, allowing short implantation time and size matching and avoiding outflow obstruction. The short implantation time reduces the need for veno-venous bypass. Our experience indicates that the cavaplasty technique can be applied to all patients and is justified by minimal technical complications.

Temporary portocaval shunt during liver transplantation with vena cava preservation. Results of a prospective randomized study

This study aims to determine whether the use of a temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) improves hemodynamic and metabolic evolution during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Preservation of the vena cava during OLT has gained wide acceptance. However, benefits of adding a temporary PCS to the piggyback technique during the anhepatic phase in patients with cirrhosis have not been shown. Eighty patients with cirrhosis were studied prospectively. They were randomly distributed into two groups: patients with a temporary PCS (n = 40) and those without a PCS (n = 40). In all cases, the piggyback technique was used. Hemodynamic profiles and biochemical data during OLT and clinical evolution after OLT were evaluated. Preoperative data were similar in both groups. Surgical time also was similar (403 +/- 77 v 387 +/- 56 minutes; P = .3). Red blood cell requirements were lower in the PCS group (2.3 +/- 2.5 v 3.3 +/- 2.9 units), although differences were not significant. In the PCS group, 45% of patients did not need red blood cell transfusion, whereas in the other group, only 22% were not administered a transfusion (P = .03). During the anhepatic phase, the decrease in cardiac output was lower in the PCS group (-9.6% v -19%; P = .05), whereas diuresis during the anhepatic phase was greater in the PCS group (3.6 +/- 2.97 v 2.1 +/- 1.38 mL/kg/h; P = .005). There were no differences in liver biochemical parameters during the first 3 postoperative days. Nevertheless, creatinine levels increased significantly during this period only in the no-PCS group. The use of a temporary PCS during OLT improves hemodynamic status, reduces intraoperative transfusion requirements, and preserves renal function during and after OLT.

Liver transplantation in the UK

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

DONOR ORGANS

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

RETRANSPLANTATION

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

OUTCOME AND SURVIVAL

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

FUTURE

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt approach and local thrombolysis for treatment of early posttransplant portal vein thrombosis

Early portal vein thrombosis is a rare but severe posttransplant complication that may lead to graft and/or patient loss. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting and local thrombolysis may represent an easy solution to this major complication of liver transplantation.

Choice of surgical technique influences perioperative outcomes in liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To examine how the choice of surgical technique influenced perioperative outcomes in liver transplantation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The standard technique of orthotopic liver transplantation with venovenous bypass (VVB) is commonly used to facilitate hemodynamic stability. However, this traditional procedure is associated with unique complications that can be avoided by using the technique of liver resection without caval excision (the piggyback technique).

METHODS

A prospective comparison of the two procedures was conducted in 90 patients (34 piggyback and 56 with VVB) during a 2.5-year period. Although both groups had similar donor and recipient demographic characteristics, posttransplant outcomes were significantly better for the patients undergoing the piggyback technique. The effect of surgical technique was examined using a stepwise approach that considered its impact on two levels of perioperative and postoperative events.

RESULTS

The analysis of the first level of perioperative events found that the piggyback procedure resulted in a 50% decrease in the duration of the anhepatic phase. The analysis of the second level of perioperative events found a significant relation between the anhepatic phase and the duration of surgery and between the anhepatic phase and the need for blood replacement. The analysis of the first level of postoperative events found that the intensive care unit stay was significantly related to both the duration of surgery and the need for blood replacement. The intensive care unit stay was in turn related to the second level of postoperative events, namely the length of hospital stay. Finally, total charges were directly related to length of hospital stay. The overall 1-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 94% in the piggyback and 96% in the VVB groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that surgical choices in complex procedures such as orthotopic liver transplantation trigger a chain of events that can significantly affect resource utilization. In the current healthcare climate, examination of the sequence of events that follow a specific treatment may provide a more complete framework for choosing between treatment alternatives.

Specific vascular complications of orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava: review of 1361 cases

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the complications specifically related to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with preservation of the inferior vena cava and to their therapeutic management. This preservation technique has considerably influenced the surgical phases of liver transplantation, increasing hepatectomy time and modifying the number of vascular anastomoses.

METHODS

Our retrospective multicentric study, based on data from 1361 adult patients that had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava in France between 1991 and 1997, analyzed the concomitant surgical complications. Type of cavo-caval anastomosis performed (piggyback, end-to-side, or side-to-side), use of a temporary portacaval anastomosis, technique-related complications, and mortality, were investigated.

RESULTS

Cavo-caval anastomosis was side-to-side in 50.6% of cases (n=689), piggyback in 42.7% (n=582), and end-to-side in 6.6% (n=90). In total, 882 temporary portacaval anastomosis were carried out. Fifty-five patients presented with one or more complications related to the preservation of the inferior vena cava technique; i.e., overall morbidity was 4.1% (55/1361). Overall mortality was 0.7% (10/1361). Mortality rate for patients who presented with surgical complication was 18%. A total of 64 complications were recorded: 57 (89%) were in the perioperative or immediate postoperative period and 7 (11%) were postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

These retrospective, descriptive results show significant advantages in favor of side-to-side anastomosis in terms of vascular complications. Certain factors should be evaluated specifically at pretransplant assessment to prevent certain serious complications; principally, these are anatomic factors of the recipient (inferior vena cava included in segment I, anatomic abnormalities of the inferior vena cava) and graft size. Depending on these factors, surgeons must be able to adapt the orthotopic liver transplantation, either before or during orthotopic liver transplantation, preferring the standard technique.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt after adult liver transplantation: experience in eight patients

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) has become an effective treatment for the complications of portal hypertension. We assessed the feasibility and outcome of TIPS in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

During the period from December 1992 to January 1998, eight adults presenting recurrent hepatitis C virus (five patients) and hepatitis B virus (one patient) infection, veno-occlusive disease (one patient), and secondary biliary cirrhosis (one patient) had TIPS because of refractory ascites (five patients), bleeding esophageal varices (one patient), refractory hepatic hydrothorax (one patient), retransplantation (two patients), and redo-biliary surgery (one patient).

RESULTS

In two patients, the procedure was difficult due to cavo-caval implantation. Ascites, hydrothorax, and variceal bleeding were controlled in all patients. Moderate to severe encephalopathy developed in four patients; two patients had worsening of their existing encephalopathy. Three of five patients treated with cyclosporine needed a drastic dose reduction due to the development of severe side effects. No long-term survivor developed shunt stenosis or occlusion. Two patients did moderately well at 6 and 14 months, respectively; the former died due to chronic rejection while waiting for a retransplantation. Three did well at 14, 36, and 28 months, respectively; the latter patient died of liver failure 32 months after TIPS. One jaundiced patient died after 1.5 months due to necrotic pancreatitis. Two patients died after 4 and 8.5 months, respectively, due to liver failure; the latter was doing well until 7 months after TIPS.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS is feasible in transplant recipients in cases of decompensated allograft cirrhosis, of allograft veno-occlusive disease or when retransplantation or redo-biliary surgery are scheduled in the presence of portal hypertension. At transplantation, the surgeon should keep in mind the eventuality of a later TIPS procedure. Close immunosuppression monitoring is warranted because modified metabolization of cyclosporine (and probably tacrolimus) may cause serious side effects.

Analysis of the complications of the piggy-back technique in 1,112 liver transplants

BACKGROUND

The "piggy-back" technique has gained acceptance in adult orthotopic liver transplantation during the last few years, especially in European countries. At the moment, however, there is controversy over advantages or specific complications (suprahepatic thrombosis or narrowing, etc.) related to this surgical technique. The aim of this study is to know of the immediate per-and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in 1112 orthotopic liver transplantations performed with a vena cava preservation technique.

METHODS

All liver transplant units in Spain were sent a questionnaire on retrohepatic vena cava preservation during orthotopic liver transplantation. The number of orthotopic liver transplantations that had been performed in the seven centers that answered the questionnaire, because the beginning of the program, was 1674, with the vena cava preservation technique used in 1112.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (2.5%) had intraoperative complications related to the vena cava preservation technique, which were treated during the operation. Eleven patients (1%) had early postoperative complications (first week), the most frequent (nine cases) being an acute Budd-Chiari syndrome in the first 48 hr. Three patients developed symptoms of massive ascites between 2 and 3 months (late postoperative complications), with patency of the retrohepatic cava verified by cavography. A hemodynamic study revealed a hyperpressure at the suprahepatic veins. This chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome was controlled in all patients with diuretics. Only six patients (0.5%) died as a result of complications related to the "piggy-back" technique. These complications were more frequent when venous reconstruction was done using two suprahepatic veins than when the three veins were used (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The vena cava preservation technique can be used routinely in orthotopic liver transplantation because it is safe and efficient and involves few surgical complications especially if for venous reconstruction we use the patch obtained by joining the three suprahepatic veins.

Hepatic sickling: an unusual cause of liver allograft dysfunction

Orthotopic liver transplantation can be performed successfully in thalassemia. In this article, we describe a case of liver transplantation in a patient with sickle cell/beta-thalassemia complicated by liver sickling. Intrahepatic sickling must be considered in case of allograft dysfunction. This condition can easily be diagnosed by biochemical investigation and liver ultrasonography.