Initial clinical experience with interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

Genetic barriers in transplantation medicine

The successful of transplantation is determined by the shared human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and ABO blood group antigens between donor and recipient. In recent years, killer cell receptor [i.e., killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR)] and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related gene molecule (i.e., MICA) were also reported as important determinants of transplant compatibility. At present, several different genotyping techniques (e.g., sequence specific primer and sequence based typing) can be used to characterize blood group, HLA, MICA and KIR and loci. These molecular techniques have several advantages because they do not depend on the availability of anti-sera, cellular expression and have greater specificity and accuracy compared with the antibody-antigen based typing. Nonetheless, these molecular techniques have limited capability to capture increasing number of markers which have been demonstrated to determine donor and recipient compatibility. It is now possible to genotype multiple markers and to the extent of a complete sequencing of the human genome using next generation sequencer (NGS). This high throughput genotyping platform has been tested for HLA, and it is expected that NGS will be used to simultaneously genotype a large number of clinically relevant transplantation genes in near future. This is not far from reality due to the bioinformatics support given by the immunogenetics community and the rigorous improvement in NGS methodology. In addition, new developments in immune tolerance based therapy, donor recruitment strategies and bioengineering are expected to provide significant advances in the field of transplantation medicine.

Trends in immunosuppression after pancreas transplantation: what is in the pipeline?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of currently available immunosuppressive strategies and novel therapeutic developments in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

From 1966 through 2012 more than 30 000 pancreas transplantations have been performed around the world with excellent patient and graft survival. However, drug-related side effects and toxicities remain to negatively affect long-term outcomes. At present, more than 90% of pancreas transplant recipients receive induction therapy with depleting or nondepleting antibodies. The most widely used maintenance protocols are based on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with early or delayed corticosteroid withdrawal. In case of documented side effects related to this standard protocol, several regimens are actively pursued to switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as well as to attempt initial calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and immunosuppression minimization. In addition, the recent documented negative impact of donor-specific antibodies on pancreas transplantation outcome has resulted in new treatment protocols for antibody-mediated rejection including intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-CD20 antibodies and protease inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Implementation of novel therapeutic strategies and combination protocols to reduce or avoid drug toxicities and immune-related complications that are evaluated in prospective and randomized trials is requested to improve outcomes after pancreas transplantation.

Current status of pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage diabetes mellitus. Over the last four decades, many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, which contributed to increased number of indications and improved allograft survival. Pancreas transplantation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure with a relatively higher complication rate, and lifelong immunosuppression. Therefore, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy such as islet transplantation have been in progress. This article summarizes the current understanding of pancreas transplantation-associated indications, donor selection, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and rejection.

Immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: progress to date

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure due to type 1 diabetes mellitus. With advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression management, outcomes have improved, with current 1- and 10-year pancreas graft survival rates of 86% and 53%, respectively. Induction therapy with either alemtuzumab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus appears to be safe and effective in the setting of rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW), with excellent graft survival and low rejection rates. There are no large randomized trials between alemtuzumab and rATG to determine whether one is better than the other. Anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody induction and no induction in combination with a CNI, MMF or sirolimus, and prednisone have demonstrated excellent graft survival rates but are associated with a higher incidence of acute rejection. The efficacy of anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies or no induction in the setting of RSW is unproven. Both of the CNIs, ciclosporin and tacrolimus, are effective in preventing acute rejection in SPKT recipients; however, pancreas allograft survival may be better with tacrolimus. MMF is more effective than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection. Sirolimus appears to be effective in preventing acute rejection, but the combination of sirolimus with a CNI may accentuate the nephrotoxicity of the CNI. RSW with induction therapy is safe and effective in SPKT recipients, but longer follow-up data on outcomes are needed. Recent analysis of registry data shows that most transplant centres are using an induction agent followed by a combination of tacrolimus, MMF and corticosteroids in SPKT recipients.

Pancreas transplantation

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

Minimization protocols in pancreas transplantation

Diagnosis of immunologic injury (acute and chronic) is much more difficult in pancreas transplants when compared with transplants of other organs. Currently, the immunosuppressive regimen for induction involves calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), antimetabolites and corticosteroids (Cs). This strong and nonspecific regimen does not take into consideration pancreas specificities (i.e. the need to avoid diabetogenic compounds). For obvious reasons, CNI might be calling for review, if permanently indicated in recipients of solitary pancreas with mild renal dysfunction. CNI as well as corticosteroids may induce hyperglycemia and contribute to differential diagnosis of a rejection process. However, in spite of the benefits accruing from withdrawal of above immunosuppressive agents, minimization or avoidance of these drugs could be dangerous and may end up with graft loss (i.e. antibody-mediated process). Long-term results of pancreas transplantation are now achieving comparable survival rates similar to the transplant of traditional organs such as kidney and liver. As a consequence, the physicians' objectives are to prolong the patient's quality of life and organ function as long as possible. Weaning strategies in regard to CNI and steroids are tested. Sirolimus, everolimus, CTLA-4 Ig, etc, are agents known to be either both nonnephrotoxic and nondiabetogenic or less so when compared with CNI. Their impact on pancreas transplantation is beginning to be evaluated. Large randomized trials in all pancreas categories, with long-term clinical and histologic results, are mandatory to establish new guidelines for immunosuppressive regimens for pancreas transplantation.

Selective unresponsiveness to beta cell autoantigens after induction immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody versus anti-thymocyte globulin

Pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes patients could result in (re)activation of allo- and autoreactive T lymphocytes. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction treatment is a successful, but broadly reactive anti-lymphocyte therapy used in pancreas and islet transplantation. A more selective alternative is daclizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (CD25) on activated lymphocytes. We tested the hypothesis that daclizumab is more selective and has less immunological side effects than ATG. Thirty-nine simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized for induction therapy with ATG or daclizumab. Auto- and recall immunity was measured cross-sectionally by lymphocyte stimulation tests with a series of auto- and recall antigens in 35 successfully transplanted patients. T cell autoimmunity to islets was low in both groups, except for a marginal but significantly higher reactivity against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)65 in daclizumab-treated patients. The memory responses to recall antigens were significantly higher in the daclizumab-treated group compared to ATG-treated patients, specifically against purified protein derivative (PPD) (anti-bacterial immunity), Haemophilus influenzae virus matrix protein-1 (anti-viral immunity) and p53 [anti-tumour (auto)immunity]. These data imply that daclizumab is more specifically affecting diabetes-related immune responses than ATG. The autoimmunity is affected effectively after daclizumab induction, while memory responses towards bacterial, viral and tumour antigens are preserved.

Choice of antibody immunotherapy influences cytomegalovirus viremia in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients requires immunotherapy against allo- and autoreactive T-cells. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause for morbidity after transplantation and is possibly related to recurrent autoimmunity. In this study, we assessed the pattern of CMV viremia in SPK transplant recipients receiving either antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-CD25 (daclizumab) immunosuppressive induction therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated 36 SPK transplant recipients from a randomized cohort that received either ATG or daclizumab as induction therapy. Patients at risk for CMV infection received oral prophylactic ganciclovir therapy. The CMV DNA level in plasma was measured for at least 180 days using a quantitative real-time PCR. Recipient peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cross-sectionally HLA tetramer-stained for CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cells.

RESULTS

Positive CMV serostatus in donors was correlated with a higher incidence of CMV viremia than negative serostatus. In patients at risk, daclizumab induction therapy significantly prolonged CMV-free survival. CMV viremia occurred earlier and was more severe in patients with rejection episodes than in patients without rejection episodes. CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell counts were significantly lower in patients developing CMV viremia than in those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their comparable immunosuppressive potential, daclizumab is safer than ATG regarding CMV infection risk in SPK transplantation. ATG-treated rejection episodes are associated with earlier and more severe infection. Furthermore, high CMV-specific tetramer counts reflect antiviral immunity rather than concurrent viremia because they imply low viremic activity. These findings may prove valuable in the discussion on both safety of induction therapy and recurrent autoimmunity in SPK and islet transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in kidney transplantation

The efficacy and safety of basiliximab, in combination with different maintenance regimens, are extensively addressed in the available literature. Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection, allows a safe reduction of steroid dosage, and is associated with economic savings, although there is substantially no proof that basiliximab prolongs either patient or graft survival. Initial basiliximab administration entails a low-risk and is associated with fewer adverse events than T cell depleting agents. However, life-threatening reactions were reported following re-exposure to basiliximab in recipients who lost graft function early after transplantation and, therefore, discontinued all immunosuppressive agents.