Biomarker and surrogate development in vascularised composite allograft transplantation: Current progress and future challenges

Vascularised composite allograft (VCA) transplantation is now a feasible reconstructive option for patients who have suffered significant soft tissue injuries. However, despite numerous technical advances in the field over two decades, a number of challenges remain, not least the management of transplant rejection. Part of the difficulty faced by clinicians is the early recognition and prevention of acute rejection episodes. Whilst this is potentially easier in VCAs than solid organ transplants, due to their visible skin component, at present the only validated method for the diagnosis of acute rejection is histological examination of a tissue biopsy. The aim of this review article is to provide an evidence-based overview of progress in the field of VCA biomarker discovery, including immune cell subsets, immune cell effector pathways, and circulating markers of allograft damage, and to discuss future challenges in the field.

Composite tissue allotransplantation: a review of relevant immunological issues for plastic surgeons

BACKGROUND

Composite tissue allotransplantation of hand, facial and other tissues is now a clinical reality. The terminology, treatment principles, drug combinations, dosage schedules and mechanisms of the immunosuppression medications on which contemporary transplant surgery is based are unfamiliar to plastic surgeons and most healthcare providers outside the field of transplantation medicine. With this in mind, the purpose of this manuscript is to provide plastic surgeons with a comprehensive and understandable review of key immunological principles relevant to composite tissue allotransplantation.

METHODS

We present an overview of the immunological basis of composite tissue allotransplantation aimed at the plastic surgery readership, based on our own experience plus manuscripts sourced from MEDLINE, EMBASE, text books, ancient manuscripts and illustrations.

RESULTS

In this manuscript we provide the reader with a brief history of composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA), a concise description of the immunological terminology, treatment approaches, risks associated with immunosuppressive therapy, risk acceptance, and current research avenues relating to contemporary CTA.

CONCLUSION

Today, as transplant and reconstructive surgeons join forces to move hand and facial tissue allotransplantation into the clinical arena, it is important that plastic surgeons have an understanding of the major immunological principles upon which this new treatment is based.

Research and Events Leading to Facial Transplantation

Facial transplantation has long captured the interest and imagination of scientists, the media, and the lay public. Facial transplantation could provide an excellent alternative to current treatments for facial disfigurement caused by burns, trauma, cancer extirpation, or congenital birth defects. This article discusses the major technical, immunologic, psychosocial and ethical hurdles that have been overcome to bring facial transplantation from an idea to a clinical reality by providing the reader with a chronologic overview of the research and events that have led this exciting new treatment into the clinical arena.

Hand transplantation: the state-of-the-art

The feasibility of hand transplantation has been demonstrated, both surgically and immunologically. Levels of immunosuppression comparable to regimens used in solid organ transplantation are proving sufficient to prevent graft loss. Many patients have achieved discriminative sensibility and recovery of intrinsic muscle function. In addition to restoration of function, hand transplantation offers considerable psychological benefits. The recipient's pre-operative psychological status, his motivation and his compliance with the intense rehabilitation programme are key issues. While the induction of graft specific tolerance represents a hope for the future, immunosuppression currently remains necessary and carries significant risks. Hand transplantation should, therefore, only be considered a therapeutic option for a carefully selected group of patients.

Composite tissue allotransplantation of the hand and face: a new frontier in transplant and reconstructive surgery

Each year an estimated 7-million people in the USA need composite tissue reconstruction because of surgical excision of tumors, accidents and congenital malformations. Limb amputees alone comprise over 1.2 million of these. This figure is more than double the number of solid organs needed for transplantation. Composite tissue allotransplantation in the form of hand and facial tissue transplantation are now a clinical reality. The discovery, in the late 1990s, that the same immunotherapy used routinely in kidney transplantation was also effective in preventing skin rejection made this possible. While these new treatments seem like major advancements most of the surgical, immunological and ethical methods used are not new at all and have been around and routinely used in clinical practice for some time. In this review of composite tissue allotransplantation, we: (i) outline the limitations of conventional reconstructive methods for treating severe facial disfigurement, (ii) review the history of composite tissue allotransplantation, (iii) discuss the chronological scientific advances that have made it possible, (iv) focus on the two unique clinical scenarios of hand and face transplantation, and (v) reflect on the critical issues that must be addressed as we move this new frontier toward becoming a treatment in mainstream medicine.

Neuroregeneration in Composite Tissue Allografts: Effect of Low-Dose FK506 and Mycophenolate Mofetil Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressant FK506 has been reported to increase the rate of peripheral nerve regeneration in nerve crush injury and nerve allograft models. The purpose of this study was to determine whether low doses of FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil had a neuroregenerative effect in revascularized peripheral nerve allografts in a rat hind limb transplantation model.

METHODS

Wistar Furth rat recipients received limbs from syngeneic Wistar Furth donors (group 1, n = 4) or from allogeneic August X Copenhagen Irish rat donors (group 2, n = 6). Wistar Furth recipients received limbs from August X Copenhagen Irish donors and were treated with FK506/mycophenolate mofetil for 5 months (group 3, n = 7). At the end of the follow-up period, histomorphometric analysis of sciatic and tibial nerves from transplanted and intact hind limbs was conducted. Sciatic and tibial nerves were examined at the level of coaptation and near the neuromuscular junction, respectively.

RESULTS

Transplanted limbs in groups 1 and 3 completed the study without rejection, while the limbs in group 2 were rejected within a few days. Sciatic and tibial nerve analysis in groups 1 and 3 limbs showed myelinated axons of various diameters but in significantly fewer numbers than in nontransplanted contralateral nerves. The number and size of myelinated axons of transplanted nerves at corresponding levels were not significantly different between syngeneic and allogeneic (FK506/mycophenolate mofetil-treated) transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that long-term neuroregeneration of revascularized peripheral nerves using low-dose FK506/mycophenolate mofetil was similar to that of syngeneic transplants. The occurrence of acute rejection episodes with low-dose FK506/mycophenolate mofetil did not appear to benefit nor impair neuroregeneration.

Donor Leukocytes Combined With Delayed Immunosupressive Drug Therapy Prolong Limb Allograft Survival

Donor leukocytes administered at the time of transplantation may prolong organ allograft survival. Delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors, such as FK506 or cyclosporine, may enhance their efficacy. Herein the effectiveness of this strategy to promote limb transplant survival was investigated in the strong histocompatibility barrier of Brown-Norway donor to Lewis recipients. Donor leukocytes (6 x 10(7) intravenously) were injected on the day of transplantation followed on day 1 to 14 with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 15 mg/kg/d) and prednisone, (0.5 mg/kg/d) which were then tapered by 20% each week and stopped at week 7. Administration of of FK506 (2 mg/kg/d) was started on day 4 and continued for 8 weeks, then tapered for 4 weeks to a maintenance dose of 0.8 mg/kg/d, which was continued for 12 weeks (group A; n = 8). A control group (n = 8) underwent identical treatment save for donor leukocyte injection but rather commencement of FK506 on day 1. Rejection was common during FK506 tapering in both groups. However group A showed a significantly later onset, a shorter period for reversal of the first rejection, and a significantly lower dosage of FK506 at the time of rejection. After the completion of immunosuppression, rejection occurred significantly later in group A than the control group with one animal surviving without immunosuppression on day 344. This is the first trial of a donor leukocyte injection combined with delayed FK506 administration in limb transplantation, which suggested that it could produce a modest but significant improvement in outcome.

Donor leukocytes combine with immunosuppressive drug therapy to prolong limb allograft survival

Donor leukocytes administered at the time of transplantation may prolong organ allograft survival. This study examined the effectiveness of donor leukocyte injection combined with immunosuppression for limb transplantation across the strong histocompatibility barrier of a Brown Norway donor to a Lewis recipient. Eight animals received 6 x 10(7) donor leukocytes injected on the day of transplantation. From day 1, FK506 (2 mg/kg/d), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (15 mg/kg/d), and prednisone (0.5 mg/kg/d) were administered for 2 weeks. After week 2, prednisone and MMF were both tapered by 20% of the initial dosage per week. After week 7, the animals received only FK506 (2 mg/kg/d). From week 8, FK506 was tapered to the maintenance dose of 0.8 mg/kg/d at week 10 and was stopped on week 24. A control group of 8 animals underwent identical treatment except that the leukocyte injection was omitted. Rejection was observed in both groups during FK506 monotherapy; however, the onset of early rejection episodes was significantly later, the period for reversal of the first rejection was significantly shorter, and the dosage of FK506 at the time of rejection was significantly lower among leukocyte-treated recipients. After completion of immunosuppression, survival was modestly prolonged in the leukocyte-treated group. One animal is surviving without immunosuppression on day 234. This trial of donor leukocyte injection combined with immunosuppression in limb transplantation showed a modest, but significant, improvement in outcome.

Hand transplantation. A future clinical option?

Transplantation of a vascularized limb or its components is defined as composite tissue allotransplantation, and is one of the newest areas in surgery. To date, 24 hands have been transplanted onto 18 recipients. The initial results have been promising, and hand transplantation may become an important procedure for functional restoration of upper limbs. However, the ethical aspects of using chronic immunosuppression for a condition which is not life threatening have been the subject of debate. In this article, we review the field of composite tissue allotransplantation.

Prolonged survival of rat hindlimb allografts following short-course FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy

The immunosuppressive effect of combined therapy using FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was studied in rat limb allotransplantation. Dark Agouti rat donor hindlimbs were orthotopically transplanted into Lewis rat recipients. In total, 38 models of transplantation were performed and divided into 8 groups that were treated individually or in combination with FK506 + MMF therapy. Animals were immunosuppressed for 28 days and then observed for up to 140 days. Graft rejection was evaluated both macroscopically and histologically. Survival times for rat limb allotransplants receiving combination FK506 + MMF therapy were significantly longer than with FK506 or MMF monotherapy, and this was achieved without serious side effects. A histopathological study demonstrated a significantly lower level of rejection with FK506 + MMF combination treatment compared to groups receiving FK506 or MMF monotherapy. Combined FK506 + MMF treatment can prolong the survival of rat limb allografts.

Experimental limb transplantation, part III: Induction of tolerance in the rigorous strain combination of Brown Norway donor to Lewis recipient

The complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy after hind-limb transplantation across a strong histocompatibility barrier (Brown-Norway to Lewis) included a low-dose combination of FK506, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone. MMF and prednisone were tapered and withdrawn between weeks 2 and 7. From weeks 8 to 24, Group 1 animals (n=23) had FK506 tapered; for those in Group 2 (n=11) the dose of FK506 was not changed. At week 24, FK506 was stopped. The six limb grafts in Group 1 (26%) that achieved the 1-year end-point uneventfully showed chimerism by bone marrow and skin grafting supporting the presence of donor-specific tolerance. Rejection, which was common during tapering of FK506, was reversed by salvage therapy. All limbs were rejected postwithdrawal in Group 2. This study showed that tapering of FK506 combined with salvage therapy may allow long-term survival of some transplanted limbs after complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy despite a complete MHC barrier.