Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: should the current indication criteria be changed?

Differentiating Well-Differentiated from Poorly-Differentiated HCC: The Potential and the Limitation of Gd-EOB-DTPA in the Presence of Liver Cirrhosis

This study uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the potential of the hepatospecific contrast agent gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in distinguishing G1- from G2/G3-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our approach involved analyzing the dynamic behavior of the contrast agent in different phases of imaging by signal intensity (SI) and lesion contrast (C), to surrounding liver parenchyma, and comparing it across distinct groups of patients differentiated based on the histopathological grading of their HCC lesions and the presence of liver cirrhosis. Our results highlighted a significant contrast between well- and poorly-differentiated lesions regarding the lesion contrast in the arterial and late arterial phases. Furthermore, the hepatobiliary phase showed limited diagnostic value in cirrhotic liver parenchyma due to altered pharmacokinetics. Ultimately, our findings underscore the potential of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI as a tool for improving preoperative diagnosis and treatment selection for HCC while emphasizing the need for continued research to overcome the diagnostic complexities posed by the disease.

The Toronto Postliver Transplantation Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Calculator: A Machine Learning Approach

Liver transplantation (LT) listing criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. To optimize the utility of limited donor organs, this study aims to leverage machine learning to develop an accurate posttransplantation HCC recurrence prediction calculator. Patients with HCC listed for LT from 2000 to 2016 were identified, with 739 patients who underwent LT used for modeling. Data included serial imaging, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), locoregional therapies, treatment response, and posttransplantation outcomes. We compared the CoxNet (regularized Cox regression), survival random forest, survival support vector machine, and DeepSurv machine learning algorithms via the mean cross-validated concordance index. We validated the selected CoxNet model by comparing it with other currently available recurrence risk algorithms on a held-out test set (AFP, Model of Recurrence After Liver Transplant [MORAL], and Hazard Associated with liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [HALT-HCC score]). The developed CoxNet-based recurrence prediction model showed a satisfying overall concordance score of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.84). In comparison, the recalibrated risk algorithms' concordance scores were as follows: AFP score 0.64 (outperformed by the CoxNet model, 1-sided 95% CI, >0.01; P = 0.04) and MORAL score 0.64 (outperformed by the CoxNet model 1-sided 95% CI, >0.02; P = 0.03). The recalibrated HALT-HCC score performed well with a concordance of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81) and was not significantly outperformed (1-sided 95% CI, ≥0.05; P = 0.29). Developing a comprehensive posttransplantation HCC recurrence risk calculator using machine learning is feasible and can yield higher accuracy than other available risk scores. Further research is needed to confirm the utility of machine learning in this setting.

Quantification of contrast agent uptake in the hepatobiliary phase helps to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma grade

This study aimed to assess the degree of differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using Gd-EOB-DTPA-assisted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with T1 relaxometry. Thirty-three solitary HCC lesions were included in this retrospective study. This study's inclusion criteria were preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA-assisted MRI of the liver and a histopathological evaluation after hepatic tumor resection. T1 maps of the liver were evaluated to determine the T1 relaxation time and reduction rate between the native phase and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in liver lesions. These findings were correlated with the histopathologically determined degree of HCC differentiation (G1, well-differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated). There was no significant difference between well-differentiated (950.2 ± 140.2 ms) and moderately/poorly differentiated (1009.4 ± 202.0 ms) HCCs in the native T1 maps. After contrast medium administration, a significant difference (p ≤ 0.001) in the mean T1 relaxation time in the HBP was found between well-differentiated (555.4 ± 140.2 ms) and moderately/poorly differentiated (750.9 ± 146.4 ms) HCCs. For well-differentiated HCCs, the reduction rate in the T1 time was significantly higher at 0.40 ± 0.15 than for moderately/poorly differentiated HCCs (0.25 ± 0.07; p = 0.006). In conclusion this study suggests that the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in HCCs is correlated with tumor grade. Thus, Gd-EOB-DTPA-assisted T1 relaxometry can help to further differentiation of HCC.

A score model for predicting post-liver transplantation survival in HBV cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma recipients: a single center 5-year experience

BACKGROUND

The prognostic prediction of liver transplantation (LT) guides the donor organ allocation. However, there is currently no satisfactory model to predict the recipients' outcome, especially for the patients with HBV cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study was to develop a quantitative assessment model for predicting the post-LT survival in HBV-related HCC patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-eight LT recipients at the Liver Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between 2008 and 2013 were included in this study. Their post-LT prognosis was recorded and multiple risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses in Cox regression.

RESULTS

The score model was as follows: 0.114X(Child-Pugh score)-0.002X(positive HBV DNA detection time)+0.647X(number of tumor nodules)+0.055X(max diameter of tumor nodules)+0.231XlnAFP+0.437X(tumor differentiation grade). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the scoring model for predicting the post-LT survival was 0.887. The cut-off value was 1.27, which was associated with a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 90.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The quantitative score model for predicting post-LT survival proved to be sensitive and specific.

Liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: how far can we go?

Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma. Although the Milan criteria have been widely used to identify suitable candidates for liver transplant with a good prognosis, many transplant centers have developed and actually used more expanded criteria. Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is at the center of expansion of criteria because it is based on the personal relationship between a recipient and a donor. Asian LDLT centers have developed various expanded criteria for LDLT using tumor biologic markers as well as the size and number of the tumors. However, there is no consensus on the limit of the expansion of criteria. Here, we present our experience and opinion on LDLT for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Histological differentiation predicts post-liver transplantation survival time

OBJECTIVES

Although liver transplantation is the most effective long-term treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the recurrence of HCC remains an issue. Current research examining recurrence after liver transplantation primarily focuses on patients' clinical characteristics. There is no consensus regarding the factors that may relate to predict the survival time and recurrence rates for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated HCC transplantation using clinicopathological analysis.

METHODS

One hundred and three patients with HCC were enrolled in the study. All data were collected from the China Liver Transplant Registry. The independent variables were as follows: age, gender, etiology, preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, body mass index (BMI), Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh scores, primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis (TNM) classification, number of tumors, the size for the largest tumor, multifocality, portal vein tumor thrombosis and histological differentiation, and prognostic staging score criteria (Milan criteria). All of the patients had previously undergone liver transplantation. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to determine the factors related to the survival time and recurrence.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 41.05±28.90 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 46.60%, and the 5-year recurrence rate was 45.63%. Forty-seven patients (45.63%) died due to HCC recurrence during the follow-up period. Patients within Milan criteria exhibited excellent post-transplantation survival times. Univariate analysis suggested that patients with poor tumor differentiation, AFP≥400ng/ml, portal vein tumor thrombosis, and TNM staging of I+II had significantly predicted shorter survival times and higher recurrence than patients displaying good or moderate tumor differentiation, AFP<400ng/ml, no portal vein thrombosis and TNM staging of III+IV for HBV-associated HCC. However, multivariate analysis revealed that poor tumor differentiation and high serum AFP were associated with a shorter survival time. Moreover, poor tumor differentiation suggested high recurrence. In addition, patients' survival time with AFP<400ng/ml was longer than that of patients with AFP≥400ng/ml even in patients with HCC beyond Milan criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor biological characteristics especially histological differentiation and serum AFP level should be considered before performing liver transplantation (LT) for patients with HBV-associated HCC. Furthermore, the AFP level and histological differentiation provide a new method for assessing HCC patient survival time after LT. Histological differentiation independently predicted post-transplantation survival time and recurrence rate for patients with HBV-associated HCC.

Prognostic significance of the worst grade in hepatocellular carcinoma with heterogeneous histologic grades of differentiation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although tumor differentiation is a known prognostic factor after the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there have not been any studies on the prognostic significance of tumor differentiation in HCC with heterogeneous histologic grades. In this study, we attempted to ascertain whether the major or the worst grade in mixed histologic type HCC determines the prognosis after liver resection.

METHODS

From January 1996 to March 2010, a total of 724 patients underwent curative resection of HCC at Yonsei University Health System, Korea. Of those, we excluded 99 patients who had total necrosis because of previous treatment. Among the remaining 625 patients, we compared the homogeneous moderately differentiated group (HG2, n = 241), mixed histologic grades with the worst component as poorly differentiated group (M2, n = 142), and homogeneous poorly differentiated group (HG3, n = 156). The clinicopathologic features, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in each group were analyzed.

RESULTS

The DFS and OS were significantly lower in M2 than in HG2 (P = 0.004 and 0.025, respectively) whereas those of M2 were not significantly different from HG3. There were no significant differences in the clinicopathologic features of each group except that microvascular invasion was more frequently observed in M2 than in HG2. On multivariate analysis, being in the worst histologic group (M2 and HG3) was an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS and OS (P = 0.028 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced histologic grade, the worst histologic grade may determine the prognosis after curative resection of HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma that relapsed 54 months after living donor liver transplantation

We report the case of a 41-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). She received living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from her husband for HCC at 36 years of age. She had few risk factors for HCC recurrence, such as elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA) II, vascular invasion, and number, size of tumors. However, recurrent tumors were found in the graft at 54 months after LDLT. Although we examined the sex chromosomes of the HCC by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods, the origin of the HCC was unclear. This is a very rare case of recurrent HCC appearing more than 4 years after LDLT in the absence of risk factors for recurrence.

Cost-effectiveness of screening for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

The effectiveness of screening and treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains undefined. Our aim was to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of screening for recurrent HCC after LT. We constructed a Markov model of the natural history after LT for HCC. We superimposed screening with computed tomography, alpha-fetoprotein, and chest X-ray every six months for 1-5 yr after LT, with resection for treatable recurrence. Screening only those whose explant pathology exceeded Milan Criteria (MC) for two yr cost $ 138,000/life-yr gained, and the incremental cost of screening all patients was $ 340,000/life-yr gained. Screening for longer than two yr incurred progressively higher incremental costs/life-yr gained. The most critical variable in sensitivity analyses was the survival benefit of finding a resectable recurrence. With the most favorable assumptions for a two-yr screening duration, screening those whose explant pathology exceeded MC cost $ 91,000/life-yr gained. In conclusion, screening for HCC recurrence after LT would probably yield most of its benefit in the first two yr, but at a relatively high cost/life-yr gained. Screening for two yr in only those whose explant pathology exceeds MC may be relatively cost-effective depending on the survival benefit of resection.

Correlação do nível de alfa-feto proteína, índice de sobrevida e recidiva tumoral em pacientes submetidosa transplante hepático

RACIONAL: O transplante hepático para carcinoma hepatocelular pode resultar em potencial cura e melhora da sobrevida comparado com operações conservadoras. OBJETIVO: Analisar os índices de recorrência e sobrevida em pacientes transplantados hepáticos por carcinoma hepatocelular e com níveis séricos de alfa-fetoproteína maiores que 200 ng/ml. MÉTODO: Foram analisados retrospectivamente 90 pacientes cirróticos com carcinoma hepatocelular submetidos à transplante hepático ortotópico entre 1997 e 2009. As lesões hepáticas foram diagnosticadas no pré-operatório por ultrassonografia com Doppler, tomografia computadorizada e níveis séricos de alfa fetoproteína. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com o nível de alfa-fetoproteína (menor ou maior que 200 ng/ml. O método de Kaplan-Meier foi usado para calcular a taxa de sobrevida. A análise de regressão Cox estudou os fatores preditivos de sobrevida. RESULTADOS: Pacientes com alfa-fetoproteína maior que 200 ng/ml (n=6) apresentaram menor taxa de sobrevida em um e cinco anos e na média de meses comparados com o grupo com alfa-fetoproteína menor que 200 ng/ml (n=84); respectivamente 35%, 18% e 11,8 meses contra 68%, 43% e 28,1 meses. Além disso, a taxa de recidiva foi 16,6% no primeiro grupo, e de 5,6% no outro. Observouse risco de óbito de 1% para cada 10 u de alfa-fetoproteína>200 ng/ml e para cada mm da maior medida de tumor acima de 28 mm. CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes com valores séricos de alfa-fetoproteína maiores que 200 ng/ml demonstraram menores taxas de sobrevida, porém não foi preditivo de recidiva tumoral.

Reliability and reproducibility of the edmondson grading of hepatocellular carcinoma using paired core biopsy and surgical resection specimens

CONTEXT

It has been claimed that the Edmondson and Steiner grading system (EGS) values should be obtained preoperatively to select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation. However, EGS reliability in biopsy specimens has been questioned.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the reliability of the EGS using core biopsy specimens and its reproducibility among pathologists.

DESIGN

Paired biopsy and surgical specimens obtained from 40 patients (subset 1) were retrieved by means of computer-aided search of the pathology records and blindly and independently reviewed. The EGS interrater agreement was measured using κ statistics. After having held a consensus meeting, pathologists graded an additional 21 paired hepatocellular carcinoma specimens (subset 2).

RESULTS

Analyzing subset 1, pathologists gave significantly lower EGS grades to the biopsy specimens (P < .001), for which the observed agreement was 32.5% (κ  =  0.021), which increased to 82.5% (κ  =  0.186) if only 2 categories were considered (low grade, EGS I-II; high grade, EGS III-IV). The observed agreement in the case of the surgical specimens was 52.5% (κ  =  0.199), which increased to 62.5% (κ  =  0.275) when the low- and high-grade scores were merged. The observed agreement between the assessments of paired biopsy and surgical specimens was 50.0% for pathologist 1 (κ  =  0.057) and 35.0% for pathologist 2 (κ  =  0.078). Merging the EGS grades did not improve the strength of the agreement. Analyzing subset 2 (after the consensus meeting), the observed agreement between pathologists improved more on biopsies (76.2%, κ  =  0.614) than on surgical specimens (61.9%, κ  =  0.434).

CONCLUSIONS

The EGS is easily underestimated in core biopsy specimens, and interrater disagreement between pathologists can be significant unless consensus meetings are held.

Role of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation with special consideration of tumor necrosis

Several authors suggest that local ablative therapies, specifically transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), may control tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who are on the waiting list for liver transplantation (orthotopic liver transplantation, OLT). There is still no evidence if TACE followed by OLT is able to prevent recurrence of tumor, to prolong survival rate of the patients on the waiting list, or to improve the survival after OLT. We report 27 patients with HCC who underwent OLT. From these patients, 15 were pre-treated with TACE alone or in combination with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) or laser-induced thermo therapy (LITT). Mean time on the waiting list was 214 d for treated patients and 133 d for untreated patients. Comparing pre-operative imaging and histopathological staging post-transplant, we found 13 patients with tumor progression out of which five were treated with TACE. In two of the TACE patients a decrease of lesions could be achieved. In a single patient, there was no evidence of any residual tumor. Only one patient displayed tumor progression prior to OLT despite undergoing TACE. Comparison of outcome in patients undergoing TACE or having no TACE was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). In addition, our analysis showed that progression either in the total study population or in the TACE group alone is associated with a significant poorer outcome concerning overall survival (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02).

Liver transplantation, liver resection, and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: which is the best oncological approach?

The aim of the study was to evaluate our institutional experience with monotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the setting of cirrhosis. A retrospective cohort study was carried out at the tertiary care academic referral center and involved 185 consecutive HCC patients with cirrhosis and no previous treatment who underwent resection (n = 61), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (n = 64), or liver transplantation (LT) (n = 60). Long-term survival and survival according to the Milan criteria were the main outcomes measured. Median survival after resection, TACE, and LT was 11, 14, and 23 months, respectively. Five-year cumulative survival after resection, TACE, and LT was 23, 10, and 59%, respectively (P = 0.001). Five-year cumulative disease-free survival after resection and LT was 15% and 77%, respectively (P = 0.002). The presence of complications in the resection group (P = 0.004), MELD score (P = 0.0003), and maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.05) in the TACE group, and tumor grade (P = 0.01) and complications (P = 0.004) in the LT group were found to be independent predictors of survival. Five-year survival for patients within the Milan criteria after resection, TACE, and LT was 26, 37, and 66%, respectively. Five-year survival for patients outside the Milan criteria for patients undergoing LT was 53%. The results suggest that LT represents the best oncological treatment option for patients with HCC in the setting of cirrhosis, even for those beyond the Milan criteria. Considering the scarcity of available organs, liver resection remains the best alternative option. TACE remains a potential therapy in patients within the Milan criteria, where it may be more beneficial than resection.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Baylor experience

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LTX) is indicated in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis.

METHODS

We compared the outcome of LTX for patients with and without HCC in 5-year time periods between 1987 and 2007 to reflect the implementation of the Milan tumor selection criteria in 1997 and of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score-based liver allocation in 2002.

RESULTS

Of 2350 patients who underwent primary LTX, 330 had HCC. Five-year patient survival for HCC patients was 28.6% in 1987-1992 and 42.3% in 1992-1997, which was 41.4-31.4% lower than that in non-HCC patients (P < 0.0001). After 1997, 5-year survival was 76% for HCC patients, similar to the survival for non-HCC patients (P = 0.8784). Five-year tumor recurrence dropped from 52.9% (1987-1992) and 48.2% (1992-1997) to 11.4% (1997-2002) and 8.4% (2002-2007) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis for tumor recurrence showed the following significant factors: tumor size >6 cm [hazard ratio (HR) 3.67], >or=5 nodules (HR 3.441), vascular invasion (HR 3.18), transplant in 1987-1992 (HR 6.772), and transplant in 1992-1997 (HR 3.059). MELD-based liver allocation reduced median waiting time for LTX for HCC versus non-HCC (35 vs. 111 days; P = 0.005) without compromise in patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of LTX for HCC continue to improve and are equal to results in patients without HCC.

Liberal selection criteria for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

To help increase the number of transplants available for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers, this single-centre retrospective study compared the safety and feasibility of new, more liberal, selection criteria—no more than five tumours, with the largest tumour no greater than 5 cm (5/5 criteria)—with classical criteria.

Methods

Data from operations performed in 1990–2005 were extracted from preoperative radiological findings and postoperative specimen analyses, and four groups were constructed: Paul Brousse, Milan, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and 5/5 criteria. A fifth group comprised patients whose tumour load exceeded the 5/5 criteria. Survival and recurrence rates were compared.

Results

For the 110 patients in the study, survival rates (overall and disease-free) were 72·8 and 66·8 per cent at 5 and 10 years respectively, with a 5·5 per cent recurrence rate. The 5-year survival rate was 65, 77, 68 and 77 per cent for Paul Brousse, Milan, UCSF and 5/5 preoperative radiological criteria, with recurrence rates of 4, 4, 3 and 3 per cent, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the only factor that influenced survival was tumour load in excess of the 5/5 criteria.

Conclusion

Use of the more liberal 5/5 criteria for selecting patients for liver transplantation results in similar disease-free and overall survival rates to classical criteria.

Improved results of transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a report from the International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation

Improved outcome after liver transplantation (LTX) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) made LTX a legitimate treatment of the disease. We analyzed trends of LTX for HCC with tumors known before transplantation in 902 patients in a large international registry across 3 periods: 1983-1990, 1991-1996, and 1997-2005. Patient survival improved gradually across eras, with 5-year survival rates of 25.3%, 44.4%, and 67.8%, respectively (P < 0.0001), and the 5-year tumor recurrence rate declined from 59% to 41.3% and 15%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The number of HCC nodules and tumor size decreased over time, and there were fewer moderately or poorly differentiated tumors. Tumors > 5 cm decreased from 54.5% to 31.7% and 11.7%, respectively (P < 0.0001), and LTX with >or=4 nodules decreased from 38.9% to 23.5% and 15.1%, respectively (P = 0.0044). Poorly differentiated tumors decreased from 37.2% to 31.8% and 20.3%, respectively (P = 0.0005). Tumor microvascular invasion remained at 21.2% to 23.8% despite changes in patient selection over time (P = 0.7124). Stepwise Cox regression analysis (n = 502) showed significant risk for tumor recurrence and patient survival for transplants before 1997 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.82 and 1.88, respectively], tumor size > 6 cm (HR, 2.09 and 1.76), microvascular invasion (HR, 1.75 and 1.69, respectively), and alpha-fetoprotein > 200 (HR, 2.45 and 2.32, respectively). In conclusion, outcome after LTX for HCC has improved continuously over the past 20 years. Improved perioperative care and better patient selection may partially explain the improved outcome after LTX for HCC.

Liberal policy in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: lessons learned

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that do not fulfil accepted tumor criteria continues to be a matter of controversy. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival and prognostic factors associated with a liberal exclusionary policy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an analysis of data collected prospectively on 57 HCC patients who underwent LDLT at our institution between April 1998 and January 2007.

RESULTS

Overall 3-year survival was 62%; this increased to 71% when 45-day mortality was excluded from the analysis. Age proved to be a predictor of survival irrespective of the 45-day mortality. In contrast, the Model for End stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicted survival only when 45-day mortality was included in the analysis, while alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level predicted survival only when it was excluded. Significant cut-off values were patient age of over 60 years, MELD score above 22, and AFP level greater than 400 ng/ml. A scoring system was developed. Survival rate at 3 years--including 45-day mortality--was 72% for score =2 and 41% for score >2 (P = 0.0146). When 45-day mortality was excluded, the survival rate at 3 years was 90% for score =2 and 32% for score >2 (P = 0.00002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results could further enhance current guidelines on age, MELD score, and AFP level for patients with HCC being evaluated to undergo LDLT.

Liver transplantation in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis: a challenging dilemma?

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) represents a potentially unfavorable prognostic factor in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is frequently difficult to establish preoperatively whether the thrombus is associated with tumor invasion or with stagnant flow. The purpose of this study was to further address this controversial issue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 12 consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC in the setting of PVT.

RESULTS

The origin of PVT in HCC patients could be accurately evaluated in 58% of the patients. Forty-two percent of patients had no evident portal vein invasion and only 17% of cases had tumor thrombi. One-third of patients experienced tumor recurrence within the first posttransplant year, and one-third of patients became long-term survivors (median survival of 36 months) with no evidence of tumor recurrence. One-year survival was 92%. Nine patients are currently alive after a median follow-up period of 25 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PVT in the setting of HCC is characterized by poor patient outcome. However, a respectable number of instances are not accurately evaluated preoperatively, making the decision to exclude these patients from LT sometimes a challenging dilemma.

Prediction of microvascular invasion before curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The accurate staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important in establishing treatment strategies and prognosis. Among tumor factors, microvascular invasion, one of TNM staging components and prognostic factors, is underestimated preoperatively, due to inaccuracy of imaging modalities. We investigated preoperative predictors of microvascular invasion.

METHODS

We reviewed 190 consecutive HCC patients given curative resection from 1999 to 2006. All were treatment-naive and monitored every 3 months after resection. Tumor recurrence, survivals, and clinicopathological factors associated with microvascular invasion were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 39.4%(median follow-up duration: 35 months). On resection pathology, 38.9% (74/190 patients) had microvascular invasion undetected preoperatively, using liver spiral computed tomography (CT) or angiography. Independent predictors of microvascular invasion were tumor size (P = 0.043), number (P = 0.011), and Edmondson grade (P = 0.001). Patients with Edmondson grade 1 and size <5 cm had no microvascular invasion, while those with grade > or =2 had higher incidences (7/18 patients, 38.8%) even in small tumor (<2 cm). When tumors recurred, presence of microvascular invasion independently increased incidences of multiple tumors, portal vein invasion, and diffuse-infiltrative patterns significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative predictors of microvascular invasion are tumor size, number, and Edmondson grade, which may be useful for making clinical decisions in both non-surgical and surgical candidates.

Liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across Milan criteria

Milan criteria are the most frequently used limits for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but our previous experience with expanded criteria showed encouraging results. The aim of this study was to investigate whether our expanded Clinica Universitaria de Navarra (CUN) criteria (1 nodule up to 6 cm or 2-3 nodules up to 5 cm each) could be used to select patients with HCC for LT. Eighty-five patients with HCC fulfilling CUN criteria were included as candidates for LT. Survival of transplanted HCC patients was compared with survival of patients without HCC (n = 180). After the exclusion of 2 patients with tumor seeding of the chest wall due to pre-LT tumor biopsy, survival and recurrence rates were compared according to tumor staging. Twenty-six out of 85 (30%) patients exceeded Milan criteria. Twelve patients had tumor progression on the waiting list. Patients exceeding Milan criteria had a higher dropout rate due to tumoral progression. One-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year survival rates of the 73 transplanted HCC patients were 86%, 74%, 70%, 61%, and 50%, respectively. Survival of patients with HCC was significantly lower than that of patients without HCC, but by multivariate analysis, HCC was not associated with lower survival. Tumor recurrence and survival rates were similar for patients fulfilling Milan and CUN criteria. Pathological staging showed 55 patients within Milan criteria, 7 patients exceeding them but within CUN criteria, and 9 patients exceeding CUN criteria. Tumor recurrence rates were 2/55 (4%), 0/7 (0%), and 4/9 (44%) in each of these groups, respectively. In conclusion, following CUN criteria could increase the number of HCC patients who could benefit from LT, without worsening the results. Because of the short number of patients in this series, these data need external validation.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of the UCSF-expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging

We previously suggested that in patients with heptocellular carcinoma (HCC), the conventional Milan criteria (T1/T2) for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) could be modestly expanded based on pathology (UCSF criteria). The present study was undertaken to prospectively validate the UCSF criteria based on pretransplant imaging. Over a 5-year period, the UCSF criteria were used as selection guidelines for OLT in 168 patients, including 38 patients exceeding Milan but meeting UCSF criteria (T3A). The 1- and 5-year recurrence-free probabilities were 95.9% and 90.9%, and the respective survivals without recurrence were 92.1% and 80.7%. Patients with preoperative T1/T2 HCC had 1- and 5-year recurrence-free probabilities of 95.7% and 90.1%, respectively, versus 96.9% and 93.6%, respectively, for preoperative T3A stage (p = 0.58). Under-staging was observed in 20% of T2 and 29% of T3A HCC (p = 0.26). When explant tumor exceeded UCSF criteria (15%), the 1- and 5-year recurrence-free probabilities were 80.4% and 59.5%, versus 98.6% and 96.7%, respectively, for those within UCSF criteria (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, our results validated the ability of the UCSF criteria to discriminate prognosis after OLT and to serve as selection criteria for OLT, with a similar risk of tumor recurrence and under-staging when compared to the Milan criteria.

A decision analysis model identifies the interval of efficacy for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

For liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the ability of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to improve outcomes remains unproven. The objective of our study was to determine if there was a specific time interval where neoadjuvant TACE would decrease the number of HCC patients removed from the pretransplant waitlist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision model was developed to simulate a randomized trial of neoadjuvant treatment with TACE vs. no TACE in 600 virtual patients with HCC and cirrhosis. Transition probabilities for TACE morbidity (1 +/- 1%), TACE response rates (30 +/- 20%), and disease progression (7 +/- 7% per month) were assigned by systematic review of the literature (18 reports). Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine time thresholds where TACE would decrease the number of delisted patients.

RESULTS

TACE treatment had statistical benefit at waitlist time breakpoints of 4 and 9 months (P < 0.05). When waitlist times were less than 4 months, waitlist attrition was similar (20% vs. 34%, P = 0.08). When waitlist times exceed 9 months, waitlist dropout rates re-equilibrated (33% vs. 46%, P = 0.06). Review of the current literature determined that only those studies reporting on patients with waitlist times between 4 and 9 months found a benefit to neoadjuvant TACE.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates that the benefit of neoadjuvant TACE may be limited to those patients transplanted from 4 to 9 months from first TACE. These data may help transplant programs to tailor TACE treatments based on predicted waitlist times to achieve optimal resource utilization and improved organ allocation efficiency.

Single-center experience on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma arising in alcoholic cirrhosis: results and ethical issues

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is currently recognized as the optimal treatment for both early hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of cirrhosis (HCC) as well as for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with HCC and ALD in the absence of viral hepatitic infections.

METHODS

Twelve recipients were transplanted with a diagnosis of HCC and ALD in the absence of viral hepatitis during a 6-year period. Nine received deceased donor livers, and 3 live donor grafts. Our results were compared to those obtained by a search of the world literature.

RESULTS

The postoperative course was uneventful in all but one patient. All recipients experienced a good quality of life postoperatively. Three-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 82 and 73%, respectively. Nine patients are currently alive, after a median follow-up of 29 months.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate liver transplantation for HCC in ALD. Although outcomes are excellent, the evaluation of patients with ALD and HCC constitutes a challenging topic in transplantation surgery, especially when live liver donation is considered. An interdisciplinary structured approach is recommended, with special emphasis on ethical considerations.

Preoperative assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma tumor grade using needle biopsy: implications for transplant eligibility

OBJECTIVE

To examine the diagnostic agreement of preoperative needle core biopsy (NCB) grading of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with the final surgical pathologic tumor grade.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Some centers have adopted protocols for selecting patients with HCC for transplantation based on tumor grade as determined by preoperative NCB. The validity of NCB to predict final tumor grade has not been previously assessed.

METHODS

A total of 211 patients who underwent hepatic resection, open radiofrequency, or transplantation for HCC between 1998 and 2004 were identified. Clinicopathologic, NCB, and surgical data were collected and analyzed using chi and kappa statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 120 (67.4%) of the 178 who underwent resection or transplantation had an NCB. On preoperative NCB, the majority of HCC cases were classified as well-differentiated (n = 35; 37.6%) or moderately differentiated (n = 44; 47.3%), while 14 (15.1%) cases were categorized as poorly differentiated. In contrast, when tumor grading was based on the final surgical specimen, there was a significantly higher proportion of HCC cases graded as poorly differentiated (well-differentiated, n = 34; 36.6%; moderately differentiated, n = 33; 35.5%; poorly differentiated, n = 26; 27.9%) (P < 0.05). The overall percent agreement of NCB and surgical pathology to determine tumor grade was poor (kappa = 0.18, P < 0.0001). Whereas final pathologic tumor grade predicted the presence of microscopic vascular invasion (well, 15.7%; moderate; 31.9%, poor; 58.4%; P = 0.001), NCB grade did not (well, 23.7%; moderate, 28.0%; poor, 25.4%; P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of candidates for transplantation based on NCB tumor grade may be misleading, as NCB tumor grade often did not correlate with grade or presence of microscopic vascular invasion on final pathology. Clinicomorphologic criteria (tumor size, number) should remain the major determinants of eligibility for transplantation.

Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of poorly differentiated HCC in hepatectomized patients.

METHODS

From 1986 to 2001, 354 HCC patients underwent curative hepatectomy in our institution and were prospectively followed. Histological examinations revealed 43 well-differentiated HCC tumors, 273 moderately differentiated HCC tumors, and 38 poorly differentiated HCC tumors. Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes after hepatectomy were compared statistically.

RESULTS

Only serum alpha-fetoprotein level was significantly different in the poorly differentiated HCC group from that in the moderately differentiated HCC group preoperatively (P=0.0001). Although there were no significant differences between overall survival rates or between disease-free survival rates in the three groups, distant metastasis within 2 years after hepatectomy occurred more frequently in the poorly differentiated HCC group (21%) than in the well-differentiated HCC group (2%) (P=0.011) or moderately differentiated HCC group (8%) (P=0.018). Distant metastasis occurred in about 40% of patients in the poorly differentiated HCC group with tumor size greater than 3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Poorly differentiated HCC tumors larger than 3 cm are already of advanced stage representing distant metastasis in the early period after hepatectomy.

Impact of incidentally found hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of living donor liver transplantation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules newly found in the explant liver have been observed, but the impact on patient prognosis is not known. Sixty HCC patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were the subjects of the study. Radiologic findings prior to transplantation and pathologic findings of the explant liver were compared. Histologic characteristics of preoperatively overlooked tumors were examined. The influence of the discrepancy between these findings on tumor recurrence was evaluated. A total of 227 HCC nodules were found in the explant livers. Of these, 91 nodules (40%) were newly found by pathologic examination. They were smaller and more likely to be well differentiated than the others. The number and size of the tumors were underestimated in 50% (30/60) and 32% (19/60), respectively. There was no significant difference in the recurrence-free survival rate between patients who met the Milan criteria both in the pre- and post-transplant evaluation (n = 29) and those who met the Milan criteria preoperatively, but exceeded the criteria in the explant (n = 19). Nodules newly found in the explant liver had little impact on recurrence-free survival. A decision for liver transplantation according to the Milan criteria based on preoperative evaluation is valuable for securing an excellent outcome.

Pre-liver transplantation locoregional adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma as a strategy to improve longterm survival

BACKGROUND

Preorthotopic liver transplantation locoregional therapy (LRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) reduces drop-out rates in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study, we investigated the efficacy of LRT as a strategy to improve longterm survival after transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data identified 100 patients with HCC who underwent OLT between 1985 and 2005. Of these, 46 received LRT in the form of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or a combination of these.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals, regardless of LRT, were 81.3%, 66.1%, and 61.3%, respectively. Demographic data and waiting time for OLT were similar between LRT and untreated groups. Pre-OLT radiologic stage was comparable (LRT: 2.11 +/- 0.74 versus Untreated: 2.39 +/- 0.94; p = 0.16). At the time of transplantation, the LRT group had notable tumor downstaging (1.50 +/- 1.34 versus 2.49 +/- 1.17; p = 0.008). The LRT group had better 5-year survival (82.4% versus 51.8%; p = 0.01), but this improvement was observed in patients with HCC stages II, III, and IV (77.6% versus 37.4%; p = 0.016). Sixteen LRT patients, and none untreated, revealed complete tumor necrosis with no viable tumor cells on explant pathology (pT0). These patients did not experience any longterm recurrence, in contrast to those with similar pre-OLT tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

OLT is a viable treatment option for primary HCC. LRT substantially downstages the primary tumor and improves longterm survival in patients with advanced disease. Complete tumor necrosis with LRT is associated with excellent longterm recurrence-free survival.

Liver transplantation and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: predictive value of nodule size in a retrospective and explant study

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major cause of post-LT death.

METHODS

To assess which preoperative and postoperative variables were related to recurrence of HCC after LT in patients with cirrhosis and HCC, we evaluated 96 patients with cirrhosis (74 with known HCC and 22 with incidental HCC) who survived more than 1 month after LT.

RESULTS

The median waiting list time was 36 days (range 1-370 days), and the median interval from detection to transplant was 180 days (range 14-1460 days). The size of largest nodule on imaging was strongly associated with recurrence (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.06; P=0.064) when transplantation was performed for known HCC. Among postoperative variables, only the largest nodule diameter (independently of the number of smaller nodules) was multivariately associated with recurrence (odds ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.08; P=0.005). The best predictive cutoff was 35 mm in diameter, based on a receiver operating curve with 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival of 90%, 73%, and 49%, respectively, for patients with a nodule 35 mm in diameter or more compared with 96%, 93%, and 89% (P=0.0005), respectively, for patients with smaller nodules.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort with a short waiting list time, only the largest nodule diameter, especially in the explant, predicted recurrence after LT independently of the number of nodules. New proposals for increasing the diameter of the largest nodule as a selection criteria for LT do not agree with our data, which on the contrary indicate the optimal nodule diameter should be 35 mm or less.

The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

No prior studies have shown that pre-operative loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improves survival following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We performed subgroup analyses according to pathologic HCC stage among 168 patients who underwent OLT to test the hypothesis that pre-operative loco-regional therapy confers a survival advantage in a subgroup at intermediate risk for HCC recurrence. Patients with pathologic T3 HCC meeting the proposed UCSF expanded criteria (single lesion not exceeding 6.5 cm or two to three lesions none > 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter within 8 cm) had a similar 5-year recurrence-free survival as patients with pathologic T2 HCC (88.5% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.56). In the subgroup with pathologic T2 or T3 HCC, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 93.8% for the 85 patients who received pre-operative loco-regional therapy, versus 80.6% for the other 41 patients without treatment (p = 0.049). The treatment benefit, according to 5-year recurrence-free survival, appeared greater for pathologic T3 (85.9% vs. 51.4%; p = 0.05) than T2 HCC (96.4% versus 87.1%; p = 0.12). In conclusion, although the lack of a randomized controlled design precludes drawing firm conclusions, our results suggest that pre-operative loco-regional therapy may confer a survival benefit after OLT in the subgroup with pathologic T2 and T3 HCC.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: is clinical tumor classification before transplantation realistic?

BACKGROUND

The decision of whether to proceed with transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis is based on clinical and imaging findings. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the current system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated data of 70 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation (LTx) at our center. We specifically analyzed the correlation between preoperative imaging studies and postoperative anatomopathologic findings. Tumor-node-metastasis, Milan, and University of California San Francisco (UCSF) classifications were used. Patients were divided in 2 groups: (1) Patients undergoing live-donor LTx (LDLTx, n=35) and (2) patients undergoing cadaveric LTx (CLTx, n=35).

RESULTS

Only 10 (14.3%) of the 70 patients considered had tumor diameter that was correctly identified by pretransplant radiologic examinations. Twenty-four (34.2%) patients had correct identification of the number of tumors present. Fifty (71.4%) patients had incorrect measurements of tumor diameter of more than 1 cm. Sensitivity of radiologic imaging was especially poor for tumors between 1 and 2 cm and less than 1 cm (21% and 0%, respectively). Best accuracy of 60% was found for both the Milan and UCSF criteria. No significant difference was found between the two patient groups concerning the accuracy of the various systems/criteria of classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Current imaging techniques have a high incidence of false-negative and false-positive results when evaluating HCC in cirrhosis. A critical appraisal of patient characteristics together with great caution when interpreting imaging studies is recommended to determine candidacy for transplantation.

Microvascular Tumor Embolism: Independent Prognostic Factor After Liver Transplantation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Microscopic tumor cell dissemination may be a more important factor in the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation, probably because of posttransplant immunosuppression. The presence of microvascular tumor embolism was undetermined as a factor for HCC recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study evaluated whether microvascular tumor embolism affects recurrence-free survival and correlates with other clinicopathologic factors after OLT among patients with HCC. From September 1996 to June 2003, 72 OLTs for HCC were enrolled in this study. Median follow-up was 22.8 months. Among 41 patients without microvascular tumor embolism, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were all 97.6%, while these rates were 77.3%, 68.2%, and 59.7%, respectively, for 31 patients (43.1%) with microvascular tumor embolism (P = .0006). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate showed significant differences for a pT2 tumor (P = .0073), for maximal tumor size <3 cm (P = .0328), for > or =5 cm solitary tumor (P = .0095), and for the presence of a tumor capsule (P = .0012), within the Milan criteria (P = .0376). At multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors for HCC recurrence were microvascular tumor embolism and histopathologic grade. In conclusion, microvascular tumor embolism is an independent predictor of HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. Although OLT is a safe and effective treatment for HCC within the Milan criteria, the presence of microvascular tumor embolism at pathologic examination can predict its recurrence. In these cases, the feasibility of immunosuppressive therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy must be considered to prevent tumor recurrence.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing at an alarming rate in the United States, such that HCC has become an important indication for liver transplantation. The role of liver transplantation in patients with HCC has evolved over the past 2 decades, and transplantation has become one of the few curative treatment modalities for patients with HCC, especially in selected patients with favorable tumors. The advent of living donor liver transplantation for adult recipients provides another therapeutic venue, in particular for patients with HCC who are disadvantaged by current allocation algorithms for grafts from deceased donors. Living donor transplantation may limit the waiting time and, as a result, may decrease the progression of disease so that intuitively the recurrence rate should be lower than for recipients who wait for an organ from a deceased donor. There are limited data on the efficacy of living donor liver transplantation in the setting of HCC. Based on a limited cohort of patients undergoing transplantation for HCC at Northwestern University Medical Center, a higher recurrence rate, stage for stage, was found in recipients whose transplants were accelerated ("fast-tracked") by performing a living donor transplant, especially in the era in which patients with HCC were disadvantaged by the allocation algorithm. Clearly, the role of living donor liver transplantation in management of patients with HCC requires prospective direct analysis of both recurrence and dropout rates in comparable patient cohorts with HCC undergoing either deceased or living donor liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: experience in Japan

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) in 316 adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LDLTx has increasingly been performed worldwide, but the impact of the procedure on HCC has not been evaluated in a large series.

METHODS

Between October 1989 and December 2003, 1389 adults underwent LDLTx at 49 centers in Japan. In 316 (22.8%) who received LDLTx for HCC (70 females, 22%, median age 57 years; and 246 males, 88%, median age, 54 years), we analyzed pretransplant clinical status, imaging diagnosis, transplant procedure, pathologic study of explanted liver, and outcome. In 232 patients (73.4%), various surgical and nonsurgical therapies had been employed prior to LDLTx. The median follow-up period was 16 months (range, 2.5-72.0)

RESULTS

Currently, 236 (74.7%) of the patients are living. One- and 3-year patient survivals were 78.1% and 69.0%, respectively. Model end-stage liver disease score and preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein level were independent risk factors for patient survival. Forty patients (12.7%) developed HCC recurrence. Alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, vascular invasion, and bilobar distribution were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence. Grade of histologic differentiation of HCC showed close correlation with tumor characteristics and recurrence. One- and 3-year recurrence-free survivals were 72.7% and 64.7%, respectively. When the Milan criteria were applied, patient survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 78.7% and 79.1%, respectively, in patients who met the criteria, and 60.4% and 52.6%, respectively, in those who did not.

CONCLUSION

LDLTx can achieve acceptable survival in HCC patients, even when liver function is markedly impaired, or HCC is uncontrollable by conventional antitumor treatments.

Clinical significance of alpha-fetoprotein mRNA in blood of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) messenger RNA (mRNA) in the blood reflects the presence of circulating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and is a sensitive marker of HCC extrahepatic metastases. The specificity of this molecular marker and its correlation with the main HCC clinical-pathological parameters remains controversial, however.

METHODS

AFPmRNA was determined in 50 HCC patients and in 50 patients with diagnosis of cirrhosis (6), or colon (24) or, pancreatic (20) carcinoma. HCC patients with clinically evident extrahepatic metastasis were excluded. HCC diagnosis was confirmed in all patients by histology on percutaneous biopsies or surgical specimens; pathological grading was assessed at the same time.

RESULTS

AFPmRNA was positive in 20 HCC patients (40%) and in 18 patients without HCC (36%). The presence of AFPmRNA in the blood correlated significantly with cholestatic indices (p<0.01), nodule size (p=0.03), vascular invasion (p=0.006) and moderately or poorly differentiated HCC (p<0.0001). Moreover, survival analysis showed a significant impact of AFPmRNA detection on overall (p=0.04) and recurrence-free survival (p=0.0007) after a median follow-up of 17 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AFPmRNA is frequently detected in the blood, even in benign liver diseases or gastroenteric tumors, in HCC patients without clinical evidence of extrahepatic metastases it seemed to identify the biologically more aggressive tumors.