The impact of disease recurrence on graft survival following liver transplantation: a single centre experience

Recurrence of Primary Disease After Adult Liver Transplant - Risk Factors, Early Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention

Liver transplantation offers a new lease of life to patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the implantation of an exogenous allograft and the accompanying immunosuppression bring their own challenges. Moreover, the persistence of risk factors for the initial liver insult place the new graft at a higher risk of damage. With the increasing number of liver transplants along with the improvement in survival posttransplant, the recurrence of primary disease in liver grafts has become more common. Pre-2015, the most common disease to recur after transplant was hepatitis C. However, directly acting antivirals have nearly eliminated this problem. The greatest challenge of disease recurrence we now face are those of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. We focus on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of the recurrence of primary disease after transplant. We also discuss means of early identification, risk stratification, prevention, and management of recurrent primary disease after liver transplantation.

[Liver transplantation in viral and autoimmune liver diseases]

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial progress in the management of viral and autoimmune liver diseases, these entities remain relevant indications for liver transplantation.

AIMS

To provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the management of viral and autoimmune liver diseases before and after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selective literature search, including current guidelines and abstracts of key scientific meetings.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Viral and autoimmune liver disease can be effectively treated in most cases, which has resulted in an overall decline in liver transplantations for this indication group. However, hepatitis D infection and primary sclerosing cholangitis remain difficult-to-treat liver diseases in some patients and may progress to end-stage liver disease despite best possible management. Viral or autoimmune hepatitis can lead to fulminant liver failure requiring emergency liver transplantation. In patients who are transplanted due to viral or autoimmune liver disease, specific measures to prevent recurrence of these diseases after transplantation are mandatory. In view of effective treatment modalities for chronic hepatitis B and C, even liver grafts from donors infected with these viruses can be considered for liver transplantation under certain circumstances.

Post-Transplant Management and Complications of Autoimmune Hepatitis, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis including Disease Recurrence

Autoimmune liver diseases have unique post-transplant considerations. These recipients are at increased risk of rejection, and recurrent disease may also develop, which can progress to graft loss and increase mortality. Monitoring for and managing these complications is therefore important, though data on associated risk factors and immunosuppression strategies has in most cases been mixed. There are also other disease-specific complications that require management and may impact these decisions, including inflammatory bowel disease in PSC. Further work to better understand the optimal management strategies for these patients post-transplant is needed.

Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis

The goal of autoimmune hepatitis treatment is to achieve clinical and biochemical remission, which is associated with significantly improved outcomes. Induction treatment with corticosteroids and the subsequent addition of steroid-sparing therapy with gradual tapering of corticosteroids remains the standard of care. Several alternatives to azathioprine and second-line agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, sirolimus, or rituximab, have been evaluated in those with intolerance or inadequate response to standard-of-care therapy. Treatment withdrawal is achievable in less than 20% of patients after 2 years of sustained remission. Liver transplantation should be considered in those with progressive liver disease or those with complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma.

Liver Transplantation: Contraindication and Ineligibility

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving therapeutic modality for patients with various advanced liver diseases. It is crucial to identify that the patient's illness is sufficiently advanced and unlikely to improve with medical management to justify the need for transplantation. At the same time, it is crucial to identify patients with comorbidities and far advanced disease that would result in an unacceptable outcome after LT. Specific care also is required before deciding on LT in the elderly, acute on chronic liver disease, patients with comorbidities, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation needs to be timed appropriately to avoid unnecessary LT and ensure that the decision is not left too late to avoid losing the patient without a transplant. Also, important is the decision as to when not to transplant. The current review explores some of these issues of contraindications and ineligibility for LT.

Main factors influencing long-term outcomes of liver transplantation in 2022

Liver transplant (LT) outcomes have markedly improved in the recent decades, even if long-term morbidity and mortality are still considerable. Most of late deaths are independent from graft function and different comorbidities, including complications of metabolic syndrome and de novo neoplasms, seem to play a key role in determining long-term outcomes in LT recipients. This review discusses the main factors associated with late mortality and suggests possible strategies to improve long-term management and follow-up after liver transplantation. In particular, the reduction of drug toxicity, the use of tools to identify high-risk patients, and setting up a multidisciplinary team also for long-term management of LT recipients may further improve survival after liver transplantation.

Post-Transplant Immunosuppression in Autoimmune Liver Disease

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are a group of conditions where immune-mediated liver damage can lead to the need for transplantation. Collectively, they account for almost a quarter of all liver transplants. Outcomes in terms of graft and patient survival for all liver transplants have improved markedly over decades with improvements in patient selection, surgical techniques and longer-term care and this is also seen in patients with AILDs. The current five- and ten-year survival rates post-transplant in autoimmune disease are excellent, at 88% and 78%, respectively. A key factor in maintaining good outcomes post liver transplant for these autoimmune conditions is the immunosuppression strategy. These patients have increased the rates of rejection, and autoimmune conditions can all recur in the graft ranging from 12 to 60% depending on the population studied. Immunosuppressive regimens are centred on calcineurin inhibitors, often combined with low dose corticosteroids, with or without the addition of antimetabolite therapy. There is no clear evidence-based immunosuppressive regimen for these conditions, and a tailored approach balancing the individuals' immunological profile against the risks of immunosuppression is often used. There are disease-specific considerations to optimised graft function including the role of ursodeoxycholic acid in both primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis and the role and timing of colectomy in primary sclerosing cholangitis in inflammatory bowel disease patients. However, unmet needs still exist in the management of AILDs post liver transplantation particularly in building the evidence base for optimal immunosuppression as well as mitigating the risk of recurrent disease.

Long-term outcome of liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: A French nationwide study over 30 years

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare indication for liver transplantation (LT). The aims of this study were to evaluate long-term survival after LT for AIH and prognostic factors, especially the impact of recurrent AIH (rAIH).

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective nationwide study including all patients aged ≥16 transplanted for AIH in France was conducted. Early deaths and retransplantations (≤6 months) were excluded.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 301 patients transplanted from 1987 to 2018. Median age at LT was 43 years (IQR, 29.4-53.8). Median follow-up was 87.0 months (IQR, 43.5-168.0). Seventy-four patients (24.6%) developed rAIH. Graft survival was 91%, 79%, 65% at 1, 10 and 20 years respectively. Patient survival was 94%, 84% and 74% at 1, 10 and 20 years respectively. From multivariate Cox regression, factors significantly associated with poorer patient survival were patient age ≥58 years (HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.2; p = 0.005) and occurrence of an infectious episode within the first year after LT (HR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.1; p = 0.018). Risk factors for impaired graft survival were: occurrence of rAIH (HR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5.0; p = 0.001), chronic rejection (HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.1; p = 0.005), biliary (HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4; p = 0.009), vascular (HR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.1; p = 0.044) and early septic (HR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5; p = 0.006) complications.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that survival after LT for AIH is excellent. Disease recurrence and chronic rejection reduce graft survival. The occurrence of an infectious complication during the first year post-LT identifies at-risk patients for graft loss and death.

Evaluation of liver stiffness measurement-based scores in liver transplantation recipients

Combining bioclinical parameters with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has improved the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) for detection of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. However, this approach has not yet been tested in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of combining LSM-based scores with LSM alone for the detection of advanced fibrosis in LT recipients. Adult LT recipients with a liver biopsy, VCTE, and clinical data necessary to construct LSM-based fibrosis models (FibroScan-AST [FAST], AGILE-3+, and AGILE-4) were included ( n = 132). The diagnostic statistics for advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stage 0-2 vs. 3-4) were determined by optimal cut-off using the Youden index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for LSM was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.89-0.99), FAST was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50-0.79), AGILE-3+ was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97), and AGILE-4 was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97). No statistically significant differences were noted between the AUROC of LSM versus LSM-based scores. The false-positive rates for AGILE-3+ and AGILE-4 were 14.5% and 11.8% compared with 8.3% for LSM alone. The false-positive rates in LSM-based scores were higher among patients with diabetes mellitus, higher AST levels, and lower platelet counts. The LSM-based scores did not improve the diagnostic performance of LSM alone in LT recipients for the detection of advanced fibrosis. This lack of improvement in diagnostic performance results from the impact of immunosuppression on bioclinical profile and underscores the importance of developing LSM-based scores that are specific to LT patients.

Liver Transplantation for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Despite a significant increase in the total number of liver transplants (LTs) performed over the last 3 decades, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has become an uncommon indication for LT, which likely reflects the benefits of earlier diagnosis and available treatment, such as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Nonetheless, LT remains the only cure for patients with progressive PBC despite medical therapy with survival rates that are among the highest of all indications for LT. Post-LT PBC patients, however, are at increased risk of rejection and disease recurrence.

Do Patients with Autoimmune Conditions Have Less Access to Liver Transplantation despite Superior Outcomes?

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a lifesaving therapy for patients with irreversible liver damage caused by autoimmune liver diseases (AutoD) including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Currently, it is unclear how access to transplantation differs among patients with various etiologies of liver disease. Our aim is to evaluate the likelihood of transplant and the long-term patient and graft survival after OLT for each etiology for transplantation from 2000 to 2021. We conducted a large retrospective study of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) liver transplant patients in five 4-year eras with five cohorts: AutoD (PBC, PSC, AIH cirrhosis), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), viral hepatitis, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We conducted a multivariate analysis for probability of transplant. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed to assess the 10-year survival differences for each listing diagnosis while accounting for both waitlist and post-transplant survival. Across all eras, autoimmune conditions had a lower adjusted probability of transplant of 0.92 (0.92, 0.93) compared to ALD 0.97 (0.97, 0.97), HCC 1.08 (1.07, 1.08), viral hepatitis 0.99 (0.99, 0.99), and NASH 0.99 (0.99, 1.00). Patients with AutoD had significantly better post-transplant patient and graft survival than ALD, HCC, viral hepatitis, and NASH in each and across all eras (p-values all < 0.001). Patients with AutoD had superior ITT survival (p-value < 0.001, log rank test). In addition, the waitlist survival for patients with AutoD compared to other listing diagnoses was improved with the exception of ALD, which showed no significant difference (p-value = 0.1056, log rank test). Despite a superior 10-year graft and patient survival in patients transplanted for AutoD, patients with AutoD have a significantly lower probability of receiving a liver transplant compared to those transplanted for HCC, ALD, viral hepatitis, and NASH. Patients with AutoD may benefit from improved liver allocation while maintaining superior waitlist and post-transplant survival. Decreased access in spite of appropriate outcomes for patients poses a significant risk for increased morbidity for patients with AutoD.

Allograft liver failure awaiting liver transplantation in Japan

BACKGROUND

Following liver transplantation (LT), allograft liver failure can be developed by various causes and requires re-LT. Hence, this study aimed to clarify the characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with allograft liver failure awaiting deceased donor LT (DDLT) in Japan.

METHODS

Of the 2686 DDLT candidates in Japan between 2007 and 2016, 192 adult patients listed for re-LT were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Factors associated with waitlist mortality were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The transplant-free survival probabilities were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median period from the previous LT to listing for re-LT was 1548 days (range, 4-8449 days). Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), which was a primary indication, showed a higher listing probability for re-LT as compared with other primary etiologies. Recurrent liver disease was a leading cause of allograft failure and was more frequently observed in the primary indication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and PSC in contrast with other etiologies. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors associated with waitlist mortality: age, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, mode for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and causes of allograft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent HCV and PSC were major causes of allograft liver failure in Japan. In addition to CTP and MELD scores, either serum ALT levels or causes of allograft failure should be considered as graft liver allocation measures.

Psychosocial Evaluation of Candidates for Solid Organ Transplantation

Transplant candidates should undergo an assessment of their mental health, social support, lifestyle, and behaviors. The primary aims of this "psychosocial evaluation" are to ensure that transplantation is of benefit to life expectancy and quality of life, and to allow optimization of the candidate and transplant outcomes. The content of psychosocial evaluations is informed by evidence regarding pretransplant psychosocial predictors of transplant outcomes. This review summarizes the current literature on pretransplant psychosocial predictors of transplant outcomes across differing solid organ transplants and discusses the limitations of existing research. Pretransplant depression, substance misuse, and nonadherence are associated with poorer posttransplant outcomes. Depression, smoking, and high levels of prescription opioid use are associated with reduced posttransplant survival. Pretransplant nonadherence is associated with posttransplant rejection, and nonadherence may mediate the effects of other psychosocial variables such as substance misuse. There is evidence to suggest that social support is associated with likelihood of substance misuse relapse after transplantation, but there is a lack of consistent evidence for an association between social support and posttransplant adherence, rejection, or survival across all organ transplant types. Psychosocial evaluations should be undertaken by a trained individual and should comprise multiple consultations with the transplant candidate, family members, and healthcare professionals. Tools exist that can be useful for guiding and standardizing assessment, but research is needed to determine how well scores predict posttransplant outcomes. Few studies have evaluated interventions designed to improve psychosocial functioning specifically pretransplant. We highlight the challenges of carrying out such research and make recommendations regarding future work.

The Need to Update Endpoints and Outcome Analysis in the Rapidly Changing Field of Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) survival rates have continued to improve over the last decades, mostly due to the reduction of mortality early after transplantation. The advancement is facilitating a liberalization of access to LT, with more patients with higher risk profiles being added to the waiting list. At the same time, the persisting organ shortage fosters strategies to rescue organs of high-risk donors. This is facilitated by novel technologies such as machine perfusion. Owing to these developments, reconsideration of the current and emerging endpoints for the assessment of the efficacy of existing and new therapies is warranted. While conventional early endpoints in LT have focused on the damage induced to the parenchyma, the fate of the bile duct and the recurrence of the underlying disease have a stronger impact on the long-term outcome. In light of this evolving landscape, we here attempt to reflect on the appropriateness of the currently used endpoints in the field of LT trials.

Characteristics, Trends, and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis in Female Versus Male Patients: An Analysis From the European Liver Transplant Registry

BACKGROUND

The influence of sex on primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), pre- and postliver transplantation (LT) is unclear. Aims are to assess whether there have been changes in incidence, profile, and outcome in LT-PSC patients in Europe with specific emphasis on sex.

METHODS

Analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry database (PSC patients registered before 2018), including baseline demographics, donor, biochemical, and clinical data at LT, immunosuppression, and outcome.

RESULTS

European Liver Transplant Registry analysis (n = 6463, 32% female individuals) demonstrated an increasing number by cohort (1980-1989, n = 159; 1990-1999, n = 1282; 2000-2009, n = 2316; 2010-2017, n = 2549) representing on average 4% of all transplant indications. This increase was more pronounced in women (from 1.8% in the first cohort to 4.3% in the last cohort). Graft survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 y was 83.6%, 70.8%, 57.7%, 44.9%, 30.8%, and 11.6%, respectively. Variables independently associated with worse survival were male sex, donor and recipient age, cholangiocarcinoma at LT, nondonation after brain death donor, and reduced size of the graft. These findings were confirmed using a more recent LT population closer to the current standard of care (LT after the y 2000).

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing number of PSC patients, particularly women, are being transplanted in European countries with better graft outcomes in female recipients. Other variables impacting outcome include donor and recipient age, cholangiocarcinoma, nondonation after brain death donor, and reduced graft size.

Donor age (≥45 years) and reduced immunosuppression are associated with the recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation - a multicenter retrospective study

The present study investigated the possible risk factors, including relationship/HLA matching between donor and recipient, and immunosuppressive therapies on the recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) after liver transplantation (LT). Subjects were 197 recipients of LT for PSC, among whom 180 surviving more than 1 year after LT were further analyzed for risk factors of recurrence. The 5- and 10-year patient- and graft survival rates were 83% and 68%, and 71% and 62%, respectively. The overall PSC recurrence rate was 25% with a 5- and 10-year graft survival rate of 34% and 18%, which was significantly lower than the survival rate of those without recurrence (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis identified the following as risk factors for recurrence: donor age (P < 0.001), cyclosporine use (P = 0.012), mono or no immunosuppressive agent (P < 0.001), postoperative biliary complication (P < 0.001), and active intestinal bowel disease after LT (P < 0.001). Among these factors, donor age ≥45 years [hazard ratio (HR), 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-2.69; P = 0.003] and mono or no immunosuppressive agent 1-year after LT (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.23-3.45; P = 0.011) were identified as independent risk factors in the final multivariate Cox regression model. The results were similar in sub-analysis for ABO-identical/compatible adult living donor LT cases.

Impact of Preexisting Inflammatory Bowel Disease on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Approximately 80% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) also have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and its effect on the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) for PSC is unclear. We retrospectively collected data from adults who underwent LT for PSC from 1989 to January 2018 in 4 French LT centers. We compared the rates of patient and graft survivals and of complications after LT. Among 87 patients, 52 (60%) had preexisting IBD. Excluding those who died within the first 3 months, the 10-year patient survival and graft survival rates were 92.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.3%-100%) and 77.1% (53.8%-85.3%), respectively, in the PSC with IBD (PSC-IBD) group and 97.1% (91.4%-100%; P = 0.44) and 83.2% (69.6%-96.9%; P = 0.43) in the isolated PSC group, respectively. Exposure to azathioprine after LT was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR], 15.55; 1.31-184.0; P = 0.03), whereas exposure to mycophenolate mofetil was associated with improved survival (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.82; P = 0.03), possibly an era effect. The rate of recurrent PSC was 21% in the PSC-IBD group and 11% in the isolated PSC group (P = 0.24). Severe infections occurred in 125 per 1000 person-years in both groups. Exposure to mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a lower risk of infection (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.85; P = 0.03). The presence of IBD was associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.05-9.98; P = 0.04). IBD prior to LT for PSC may not affect patient or transplant survival but may increase the risk of CMV infection.

Medical care of liver transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation is a life-changing event for patients and survival following transplantation has improved significantly since the first transplantation in 1967. Following liver transplantation, patients face a unique set of healthcare management decisions including transplantation-specific complications, recurrence of primary liver disease, as well as metabolic and malignancy concerns related to immunosuppression. As more patients with liver disease receive transplantation and live longer, understanding and managing these patients will require not only transplant specialist but also local subspecialist and primary care physicians.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers common issues related to the management of patients following liver transplantation including immunosuppression, liver allograft dysfunction, metabolic complications, as well as routine health maintenance such as immunizations and cancer screening.

EXPERT OPINION

Optimizing medical care for patients following liver transplant will benefit from ensuring all providers, not just transplant specialist, have a basic understanding of the common issues encountered in the post-transplant patient. This review provides an overview of common healthcare concerns and management options for patients following liver transplantation.

Increased Posttransplant Mortality for Autoimmune Hepatitis Compared With Other Autoimmune Liver Diseases

GOALS

We sought to compare posttransplant outcomes between autoimmune liver disease.

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune liver diseases, namely primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) generally have favorable posttransplant outcomes. PSC is known to require more retransplantation compared with PBC, however, comparisons to AIH are lacking. We sought to compare graft survival and the need for retransplant in AIH compared with other autoimmune liver disease.

STUDY

We compared posttransplant graft survival among the 3 entities using Cox regression and competing for risk analyses using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database.

RESULTS

We found AIH is associated with significantly decreased graft survival compared with PBC [hazard ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.96] and PSC (hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.8-0.99) after controlling for potential confounders. This is mainly driven by posttransplant death. On competing for risk analysis, AIH was associated with higher risk of death compared with PBC [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR): 0.79; 95% CI: 0.7-0.89] and PSC (SHR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.64-0.82) and lower risk of retransplant compared with PSC (SHR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.19-1.8).

CONCLUSION

As prior studies have shown the similar risk of disease recurrence in AIH and PSC, our study indicates at least part of the increased posttransplant mortality in AIH may be due lower retransplantation rate in this population.

Debate on Selection Criteria for Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Hepatitis: Tighten or Loosen?

Although liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a well-accepted practice, LT for severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH) remains controversial due to concerns about the limited organ supply and the risk of return to harmful drinking. Recognizing an increasing body of favorable evidence, a convergence of practice guideline recommendations from leading hepatology and gastroenterology societies have suggested that the length of abstinence should not be a sole criterion for LT selection and, thus, that LT may be considered in carefully selected severe AH patients with favorable psychosocial profiles not responding to medical therapy. We sought to examine this new consensus in greater detail, debating whether candidate selection criteria for LT in AH should be tightened or loosened.

Risk factors for recurrent autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune liver disease (ALD) is a chronic liver disease caused by immune dysfunction in the body. However, no causative or curative medical treatment with proven efficacy exists to cure ALDs, and liver transplantation (LT) remains the only effective treatment available. However, the problem of recurrence of ALDs (rALDs) still remains after LT, which seriously affects the survival rate of the patients. Therefore, clinicians need to be aware of the risk factors affecting rALDs after LT. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to define the risk factors for rALDs, which include the recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis.

METHODS

A systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science databases was performed from 1980 to 2019. The inclusion criteria were risk factors for developing rALDs after LT. However, case series, case reports, reviews, meta-analysis and studies only including human immunodeficiency virus cases, children, and pregnant patients were excluded.

RESULTS

The electronic database search yielded 1728 results. Sixty-three retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and 13 were included in the meta-analysis. The final cohort included 5077 patients, and among them, 21.96% developed rALDs. Colectomy before LT, HR 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.96), cholangiocarcinoma, HR 3.42 (95% CI: 1.88-6.21), multiple episodes of acute cellular rejection, HR 2.07 (95% CI: 1.27-3.37), model for end-stage liver disease score, HR 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02-1.08), use of mycophenolate mofetil, HR 1.46 (95% CI: 1.00-2.12) and the use of cyclosporin A, HR 0.69 (95% CI: 0.49-0.97) were associated with the risk of rprimary sclerosing cholangitis. In addition, the use of tacrolimus, HR 1.73 (95% CI: 1.00-2.99) and cyclosporin A, HR 0.59 (95% CI: 0.39-0.88) were associated with the risk of rALD.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple risk factors for rALDs were identified, such as colectomy before LT, cholangiocacinoma, multiple episodes of acute cellular rejection, model for end-stage liver disease score, and especially the use of mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporin A and tacrolimus.

Similarities and Differences Between Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Other Causes of Cirrhosis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease includes a spectrum of liver disorders that range from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and smoking status increase risk of progression to cirrhosis among patients with NASH. Cirrhosis derived from non-NASH causes may share similar features with patients with NASH but embody distinct pathogenetic mechanisms, genetic associations, prognosis, and outcomes. This article discusses in detail the comparison of clinical, genetic, and outcome characteristics between patients with NASH cirrhosis as opposed to alternative causes of chronic liver disease.

Good Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholestatic disorder with liver transplantation (LT) being the only definitive treatment in end-stage disease. Recurrence of PSC after LT is a significant concern which can lead to graft loss. The aim of this study is to find out the disease recurrence and long-term outcome after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in PSC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing LDLT for PSC at our centre. Of 2268 adult LTs from August 2004 to July 2018, 32 (1.4%) patients underwent LDLT for PSC including 6 with PSC and autoimmune hepatitis overlap. The data were reviewed to look for PSC recurrence, complications, and overall survival. All patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Data are shown as number, percentage, median, and interquartile range (IQR).

RESULT

The mean age of 32 LDLT recipients was 44 ± 12 years (males 22, females 10). At the time of transplantation, the mean child's score was 9 ± 1.6 and model for end-stage liver disease score was 18.9 ± 6.4. Ulcerative colitis was seen in 7 patients and none had cholangiocarcinoma. Majority of patients (n = 29) received right lobe graft and all but 3 underwent hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction. PSC recurrence was seen in 6 (20%) patients during a median follow-up of 59 (29-101) months, after exclusion of 2 patients with early mortality. A total of five patients died during follow-up, and one of these deaths was due to PSC recurrence. There were 2 perioperative deaths due to sepsis and 3 deaths on follow-up (sepsis in 2 and PSC recurrence in 1).

CONCLUSION

LDLT can be performed in PSC with good overall long-term outcomes.

A review of behavioral alcohol interventions for transplant candidates and recipients with alcohol-related liver disease

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is a common indication for liver transplantation. Reflecting growing consensus that early transplant (ie, prior to sustained abstinence) can be a viable option for acute alcoholic hepatitis, access to liver transplantation for ALD patients has increased. Prevention of alcohol relapse is critical to pretransplant stabilization and posttransplant survival. Behavioral interventions are a fundamental component of alcohol use disorder treatment, but have rarely been studied in the transplant context. This scoping review summarizes published reports of behavioral and psychosocial alcohol interventions conducted with ALD patients who were liver transplant candidates and/or recipients. A structured review identified 11 eligible reports (3 original research studies, 8 descriptive papers). Intervention characteristics and clinical outcomes were summarized. Interventions varied significantly in orientation, content, delivery format, and timing/duration. Observational findings illustrate the importance of situating alcohol interventions within a multidisciplinary treatment context, and suggest the potential efficacy of cognitive-behavioral and motivational enhancement interventions. However, given extremely limited research evaluating behavioral alcohol interventions among ALD patients, the efficacy of behavioral interventions for pre- and posttransplant alcohol relapse remains to be established.

Risk of recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation is associated with de novo inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

To evaluate risk factors for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) recurrence (rPSC) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with well-preserved colons.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of all patients transplanted for PSC in our center between July 1994 and May 2015 and selected 47 with follow-up of at least 60 mo for further analysis based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. rPSC was confirmed by magnetic resonance or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and liver biopsy. All patients were evaluated by protocolary pre-OLT colonoscopy with randomized mucosal biopsies. Colonoscopy was repeated annually after OLT. Both organ donors and recipients were human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typed by serological and/or DNA methods. All input data were thoroughly analyzed employing relevant statistical methods.

RESULTS

Altogether, 31 men and 16 women with a median (range) age of 36 (15-68) years at the time of OLT and a median follow-up of 122 (60-249) mo were included. rPSC was confirmed in 21/47 (44.7%) of patients, a median 63 (12-180) mo after transplantation. De novo colitis [rPSC in 11/12, P ≤ 0.05, hazard ratio (HR): 4.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-10.98] and history of acute cellular rejection (rPSC in 14/25, P ≤ 0.05; HR: 2.66, 95%CI: 1.03-7.86) showed strong positive associations with rPSC. According to the univariate analysis, overlapping features of autoimmune hepatitis (rPSC in 5/5, P ≤ 0.05) and HLA-DRB1*07 in the donor (rPSC in 10/15, P ≤ 0.05) represent other potential risk factors for rPSC, while the HLA-DRB1*04 (rPSC in 0/6, P ≤ 0.05), HLA-DQB1*03 (rPSC in 1/11, P ≤ 0.05), and HLA-DQB1*07 (rPSC in 0/7, P ≤ 0.05) recipient alleles may have protective roles.

CONCLUSION

De novo colitis and acute cellular rejection are clinical conditions significantly predisposed towards recurrence of PSC after liver transplantation.

Liver Transplantation in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Retrospective Study

Aim

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the most common liver disease in the Western World. Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment for end-stage ALD. However, many transplant centers are still reluctant to transplant these patients because of the risk of alcohol relapse, recurrence of the primary liver disease and associated post-transplant complications. We examined survival rate, prevalence of primary liver disease recurrence, re-transplantation and post-transplant complications among transplanted patients for alcoholic cirrhosis compared with those transplanted for viral cirrhosis.

Methods

data about patients transplanted for alcoholic and viral cirrhosis at the Gemelli Hospital from January 1995 to April 2016 were retrospectively collected. Survival rate was evaluated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Recurrence was defined as histological evidence of primary liver disease. Data on the onset of complication, causes of death and graft failure after liver transplant were analyzed.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference regarding survival rate between the two groups. Only patients transplanted for viral cirrhosis presented with primary liver disease recurrence. There was a higher rate of cancer development in patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis. Cancer was the major cause of death in this population. Risk factors associated with the onset of cancer were a high MELD score at the transplant time and smoking after transplantation.

Conclusion

ALD is a good indication for LT. Patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis should receive regular cancer screening and should be advised against smoking.

Short Summary

No difference was found between patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis and viral cirrhosis in term of survival rate. Only patients transplanted for viral cirrhosis presented primary liver disease recurrence. A higher rate of cancer development was found in patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrohosis. This complication was associated with post-trasplant smoking.

The impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on graft survival following liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the only life-extending intervention for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Given the co-existence with colitis, patients may also require colectomy; a factor potentially conferring improved post-transplant outcomes.

AIM

To determine the impact of restorative surgery via ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) vs retaining an end ileostomy on liver-related outcomes post-transplantation.

METHODS

Graft survival was evaluated across a prospectively accrued transplant database, stratified according to colectomy status and type.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 2016, 240 individuals with PSC/colitis underwent transplantation (cumulative 1870 patient-years until first graft loss or last follow-up date), of whom 75 also required colectomy. A heightened incidence of graft loss was observed for the IPAA group vs those retaining an end ileostomy (2.8 vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years, log-rank P = 0.005), whereas rates between IPAA vs no colectomy groups were not significantly different (2.8 vs 1.7, P = 0.1). In addition, the ileostomy group experienced significantly lower graft loss rates vs. patients retaining an intact colon (P = 0.044). The risks conferred by IPAA persisted when taking into account timing of colectomy as related to liver transplantation via time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary strictures were the principal aetiologies of graft loss overall. Incidence rates for both were not significantly different between IPAA and no colectomy groups (P = 0.092 and P = 0.358); however, end ileostomy appeared protective (P = 0.007 and 0.031, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In PSC, liver transplantation, colectomy + IPAA is associated with similar incidence rates of hepatic artery thrombosis, recurrent biliary strictures and re-transplantation compared with no colectomy. Colectomy + end ileostomy confers more favourable graft outcomes.

Current Status of Liver Transplantation for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune cholestatic liver disease diagnosed with elevated alkaline phosphatase in the presence of antimitochondrial antibody. With the introduction and widespread use of ursodeoxycholic acid the proportion of PBC patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) has decreased. However, up to 40% of patients are ursodeoxycholic acid nonresponders and require second-line treatment or progress to end-stage liver disease requiring LT. Several scoring systems have been developed and validated to assess treatment response and transplant-free survival in patients. Although PBC is a favorable indication for LT, recurrence of PBC may occur and requires biopsy for diagnosis.

Con: Steroids Should Not Be Withdrawn in Transplant Recipients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) can recur following liver transplantation (LT) despite immunosuppressive therapy, with implications for graft survival. Although the evidence is not robust, disease recurrence seems to occur in the presence of less intense and/or steroid-free immunosuppression (IS) in particular in the case of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The main risk factor for AIH recurrence is the severity of disease activity in the explant and potential donor/recipient human leukocyte antigen D-related 3 (DR3) mismatch. The treatment for AIH recurrence includes reintroduction or increase in the dose of steroids with or without the addition of azathioprine. T cell-mediated rejection episodes are also more common in AILD. Steroid withdrawal is the common practice in LT for non-AILD, eliminating the risks associated with longterm exposure to steroids. In AILD, maintenance of steroids at a low dose in the long term may reduce the risk of disease recurrence and rejection. This strategy is safe when there is vigilance for steroid-related adverse effects. Alternatively, identifying patients who are at the greatest risk for disease recurrence and who would benefit from intensified IS might be an option.

Recipient characteristics and morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Over the last decade, liver transplantation of sicker, older non-hepatitis C cirrhotics with multiple co-morbidities has increased in the United States. We sought to identify an easily applicable set of recipient factors among HCV negative adult transplant recipients associated with significant morbidity and mortality within five years after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We collected national (n = 31,829, 2002-2015) and center-specific data. Coefficients of relevant recipient factors were converted to weighted points and scaled from 0-5. Recipient factors associated with graft failure included: ventilator support (five patients; hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; 95% CI 1.48-1.72); recipient age >60 years (three patients; HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.23-1.36); hemodialysis (three patients; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.16-1.37); diabetes (two patients; HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.14-1.27); or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl without hemodialysis (two patients; HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.09-1.22).

RESULTS

Graft survival within five years based on points (any combination) was 77.2% (0-4), 69.1% (5-8) and 57.9% (>8). In recipients with >8 points, graft survival was 42% (model for end-stage liver disease [MELD] score <25) and 50% (MELD score 25-35) in recipients receiving grafts from donors with a donor risk index >1.7. In center-specific data within the first year, subjects with ≥5 points (vs. 0-4) had longer hospitalization (11 vs. 8 days, p <0.01), higher admissions for rehabilitation (12.3% vs. 2.7%, p <0.01), and higher incidence of cardiac disease (14.2% vs. 5.3%, p <0.01) and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (78.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.03) within five years.

CONCLUSION

The impact of co-morbidities in an MELD-based organ allocation system need to be reassessed. The proposed clinical tool may be helpful for center-specific assessment of risk of graft failure in non-HCV patients and for discussion regarding relevant morbidity in selected subsets.

LAY SUMMARY

Over the last decade, liver transplantation of sicker, older patient with multiple co-morbidities has increased. In this study, we show that a set of recipient factors (recipient age >60 years, ventilator status, diabetes, hemodialysis and creatinine >1.5 mg/dl) can help identify patients that may not do well after transplant. Transplanting sicker organs in patients with certain combinations of these characteristics leads to lower survival.

Follow-up of the Post-Liver Transplantation Patient: A Primer for the Practicing Gastroenterologist

The focus in liver transplantation in the next 10 years will likely change from preventing viral disease recurrence to minimizing the toll of rejection and fatty liver disease, minimizing the complications from immunosuppression with withdrawal strategies, and more optimal management of long-term risks, such as malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and renal failure. In addition, now that short-term results (<1 year) have improved significantly, there will be a shift toward improving long-term patient and graft survival, as well as a focus on primary care preventive strategies.

Outcomes of Liver Transplant Recipients With Autoimmune Liver Disease Using Long-Term Dual Immunosuppression Regimen Without Corticosteroid

Background

Liver transplant (LT) recipients with autoimmune liver disease (primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis) are at increased risk of developing acute cellular rejection (ACR), and in many cases graft failure due to recurrent disease. We describe our experience with dual immunosuppression without steroid maintenance and analyze its effect on disease recurrence; ACR; patient and graft survivals; and complications, such as sepsis and de novo malignancy.

Methods

We included 74 consecutive LT recipients (April 2006 to April 2013) with autoimmune liver disease (primary sclerosing cholangitis, 20; primary biliary cholangitis, 23; autoimmune hepatitis, 31) from a single transplant center. Immunosuppression protocol included rabbit antithymocyte globulin for induction and mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus or sirolimus/everolimus indefinitely for maintenance.

Results

Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year patient survival was 95.9%, 90.4%, 82,2% and 74.9%, re–graft-free survival was 93.2%, 86.3%, 79.9%, and 72.8%, respectively (median follow-up, 5.5 years). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, sepsis during post-LT period (P = 0.040; hazard ratio [HR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-6.11), steroid use for ACR (P = 0.037; HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.06-6.34), and younger age (<40 years) at LT (P = 0.038; HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.05-6.10) predicted graft survival, whereas steroid use for ACR was the only variable that was predictive of overall patient survival (P = 0.004; HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.59-10.52). Overall, 34 biopsy-proven ACR was noted in 22 LT recipients (30%), 13 (17.5%) had disease recurrence, and 34 episodes of sepsis occurred in 19 patients.

Conclusions

Dual immunosuppression protocol in LT recipients with autoimmune liver disease without corticosteroid maintenance had acceptable rates of survival and ACR without predisposing patients to the adverse effects of long-term steroid therapy.

Inflammatory bowel disease in liver transplanted patients

Most common hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis, ranking them as the main cause of liver transplantation (LT) in IBD setting. Course of pre-existing IBD after LT differs depending on many transplant related factors. Potential risk factors related to IBD deterioration after LT are tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens, active IBD and cessation of 5-aminosalicylates at the time of LT. About 30% patients experience improvement of IBD after LT, while approximately the same percentage of patients worsens. Occurrence of de novo IBD may develop in 14%-30% of patients with PSC. Recommended IBD therapy after LT is equivalent to recommendations to overall IBD patients. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha appears to be efficient for refractory IBD. Due to potential side effects it needs to be applied with caution. In average 9% of patients require proctocolectomy due to medically refractory IBD or colorectal carcinoma. The most frequent complication in patients who undergo proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis is pouchitis. It is still undeterminable if LT adds to risk of developing pouchitis in PSC patients. Annual colonoscopies are recommended as surveillance and precaution of colonic malignancies.

Cholestatic Liver Diseases After Liver Transplant

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are the most common cholestatic liver diseases (CLD) in adults. Liver transplant (LT) is desirable for those who progress to end-stage liver disease. CLD have become an uncommon indication for LT. PSC and PBC accounted for 7.1% of all adult LT in 2015. CLD have the best post-LT outcomes compared with other indications for LT. Disease recurrence of PSC and PBC after LT is reported in up to 37% and 43% of LT recipients, respectively. Although recurrent PBC does not affect post-LT outcomes, recurrent PSC is associated with worse post-LT survival.

Recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis and auto-immune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a well-accepted treatment for decompensated chronic liver disease due to primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and auto-immune hepatitis (AIH). Survival after liver transplantation is generally good with 1 and 5-year survival rates around 90% and 70-85%. After transplantation, however, these diseases recur in 8.6-27% (rPSC), 10.9-42.3% (rPBC) and 7-42% (rAIH), and this poses significant challenges in terms of management and graft outcome in these patients. In this review we discuss the incidence, clinical presentation, challenges in diagnosis, reported risk factors and impact on post-transplant outcomes of recurrence of PSC, PBC and AIH after liver transplantation. We also discuss some of the limitations of current investigations and formulate idea's for future research objectives.

Systematic review: recurrent autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) constitute the third most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Outcomes post LT are generally good but recurrent disease is frequently observed.

AIMS

To describe the frequency and risk factors associated with recurrent AILD post-LT and provide recommendations to reduce the incidence of recurrence based on levels of evidence.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for full-text papers published in English-language journals, using the keywords 'autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)', 'primary biliary cholangitis and/or cirrhosis (PBC)', 'primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)', 'liver transplantation' and 'recurrent disease'. Management strategies to reduce recurrence after LT were classified according to grade and level of evidence.

RESULTS

Survival rates post-LT are approximately 90% and 70% at 1 and 5 years and recurrent disease occurs in a range of 10-50% of patients with AILD. Recurrent AIH is associated with elevated liver enzymes and IgG before LT, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the explants and lack of steroids after LT (Grade B). Tacrolimus use is associated with increased risk; use of ciclosporin and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid with reduced risk of PBC recurrence (all Grade B). Intact colon, active ulcerative colitis and early cholestasis are associated with recurrent PSC (Grade B).

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations based on grade A level of evidence are lacking. The need for further study and management includes active immunosuppression before liver transplantation and steroid use after liver transplantation in autoimmune hepatitis; selective immunosuppression with ciclosporin and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for primary biliary cholangitis; and improved control of inflammatory bowel disease or even colectomy in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Recurrence of autoimmune liver disease and inflammatory bowel disease after pediatric liver transplantation

Approximately 10% of children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and 30% of those with sclerosing cholangitis (SC) require liver transplantation (LT). LT is indicated in patients who present with fulminant hepatic failure (ie, with encephalopathy) and in those who develop end-stage liver disease despite treatment. After LT, recurrent AIH is reported in approximately 30% of patients and recurrent SC in up to 50%. Diagnosis of recurrence is based on biochemical abnormalities, seropositivity for autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on histology, steroid dependence, and, for SC, presence of cholangiopathy. Recurrence of SC after LT is often associated with poorly controlled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recurrence may even appear years after LT; therefore, steroid-based immunosuppression should be maintained at a higher dose than that used for patients transplanted for nonautoimmune liver diseases. Although the impact of recurrent disease on graft function is controversial, it seems that in pediatric LT recipients recurrence of AIH or SC is associated with compromised graft survival. Exacerbation of preexistent IBD may be observed after LT for SC or AIH, and IBD appears to have a more aggressive course than before LT. In addition, IBD can develop de novo following LT. Liver Transplantation 22 1275-1283 2016 AASLD.

Autoimmune Liver Disease Post-Liver Transplantation: A Summary and Proposed Areas for Future Research

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) are rare diseases with a reported prevalence of less than 50 per 100 000 population. As the research landscape and our understanding of AILDs and liver transplantation evolves, there remain areas of unmet needs. One of these areas of unmet needs is prevention of disease recurrence after liver transplantation. Disease recurrence is not an insignificant event because allograft loss with the need for retransplantation can occur. Patients transplanted for AILD are more likely to experience acute rejection compared to those transplanted for non-AILD, and the reason(s) behind this observation is unclear. Tasks for the future include a better understanding of the pathogenesis of AILD, definition of the precise pathogenetic mechanisms of recurrent AILD, and development of strategies that can identify recipients at risk for disease recurrence. Importantly, the role of crosstalk between alloimmune responses and autoimmune responses in AILD is an important area that needs further study.

This article reviews the relevant literature of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, recurrent autoimmune hepatitis, recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis in terms of the clinical entity, the scientific advancements, and future scientific goals to enhance our understanding of these diseases.

A review of the relevant literature of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, recurrent autoimmune hepatitis, recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis in terms of the clinical entity, the scientific advancements and future scientific goals to enhance our understanding of these diseases.

Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Pretransplant Selection and Posttransplant Management

Alcoholic fatty liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are common causes of chronic liver disease throughout the world. Although they have similar histologic features, a diagnosis of NAFLD requires the absence of significant alcohol use. ALD is seen commonly in patients with a long-standing history of excessive alcohol use, whereas NAFLD is encountered commonly in patients who have developed complications of obesity, such as insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Lifestyle contributes to the development and progression of both diseases. Although alcohol abstinence can cause regression of ALD, and weight loss can cause regression of NAFLD, many patients with these diseases develop cirrhosis. ALD and NAFLD account for nearly 30% of liver transplants performed in the United States. Patients receiving liver transplants for ALD or NAFLD have similar survival times as patients receiving transplants for other liver disorders. Although ALD and NAFLD recur frequently after liver transplantation, graft loss from disease recurrence after transplantation is uncommon. Cardiovascular disease and de novo malignancy are leading causes of long-term mortality in liver transplant recipients with ALD or NAFLD.

Predictive factors for survival and score application in liver retransplantation for hepatitis C recurrence

AIM: To identify risk factors associated with survival in patients retransplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence and to apply a survival score to this population.

METHODS: We retrospectively identified 108 patients retransplanted for HCV recurrence in eight European liver transplantation centers (seven in France, one in Spain). Data collection comprised clinical and laboratory variables, including virological and antiviral treatment data. We then analyzed the factors associated with survival in this population. A recently published score that predicts survival in retransplantation in patients with hepatitis C was applied. Because there are currently no uniform recommendations regarding selection of the best candidates for retransplantation in this setting, we also described the clinical characteristics of 164 patients not retransplanted, with F3, F4, or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) post-first graft presenting with hepatic decompensation.

RESULTS: Overall retransplantation patient survival rates were 55%, 47%, and 43% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Patients who were retransplanted for advanced cirrhosis had survival rates of 59%, 52%, and 49% at 3, 5, and 10 years, while those retransplanted for FCH had survival rates of 34%, 29%, and 11%, respectively. Under multivariate analysis, and adjusting for the center effect and the occurrence of FCH, factors associated with better survival after retransplantation were: negative HCV viremia before retransplantation, antiviral therapy after retransplantation, non-genotype 1, a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score < 25 when replaced on the waiting list, and a retransplantation donor age < 60 years. Although the numbers were small, in the context of the new antivirals era, we showed that outcomes in patients who underwent retransplantation with undetectable HCV viremia did not depend on donor age and MELD score. The Andrés score was applied to 102 patients for whom all score variables were available, producing a mean score of 43.4 (SD = 6.6). Survival rates after the date of the first decompensation post-first liver transplantation (LT1) in the liver retransplantation (reLT) group (94 patients decompensated) at 3, 5, and 10 years were 62%, 59%, and 51%, respectively, among 78 retransplanted individuals with advanced cirrhosis, and 42%, 32%, and 16% among 16 retransplanted individuals with FCH. In the non-reLT group with hepatic decompensation, survival rates were 27%, 18%, and 9% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retransplanted patients, retransplanted patients were younger at LT1 (mean age 48 ± 8 years compared to 53 ± 9 years in the no reLT group, P < 0.0001), less likely to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection (4% vs 14% among no reLT patients, P = 0.005), more likely to have received corticosteroid bolus therapy after LT1 (25% in reLT vs 12% in the no reLT group, P = 0.01), and more likely to have presented with sustained virological response (SVR) after the first transplantation (20% in the reLT group vs 7% in the no reLT group, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION: Antiviral therapy before and after retransplantation had a substantial impact on survival in the context of retransplantation for HCV recurrence, and with the new direct-acting antivirals now available, outcomes should be even better in the future.