Developments in the epidemiolgy of invasive fungal infections – implications for the empiric and targeted antifungal therapy

Time to Positivity Facilitates an Early Differential Diagnosis of Candida tropicalis from Other Candida species

Background

Candidemia caused by Candida tropicalis has more serious adverse consequences and an even higher mortality. Time to positivity (TTP) has been widely used to identify microbial species, resistant microorganisms and distinguish real pathogens and pollutants. However, few studies have demonstrated TTP as a presumptive diagnosis of C. tropicalis in patients with candidemia.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study of 136 episodes of candidemia and simulated blood cultures with 314 episodes of confirmed Candida strains were applied to explore the role of TTPs in diagnosing C. tropicalis. TTPs were recorded as the shorter one if both aerobic and anaerobic vials were positive. Lastly, relationships were tested between TTPs and resistance and initial inocula concentration.

Results

For the retrospective study, the mean of TTPs for C. tropicalis from 136 patients with candidemia was significantly shorter than other Candida species. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.8896 ± 0.030 with a sensitivity of 92.86% and a specificity of 77.87%, respectively, indicating TTPs with a cut-off value of <25.50 h had a strong diagnostic power for C. tropicalis in patients with candidemia. Moreover, TTPs from 314 simulated blood cultures showed similar results as the retrospective study, demonstrating TTP is a powerful diagnostic tool in early diagnosing C. tropicalis in patients with candidemia. Additionally, our results showed no statistical significance between TTPs and initial inocula concentration and resistance of Candida species, suggesting initial inocula concentration does not impact TTPs, and TTPs may not be promising in predicting the resistance of all Candida species.

Conclusion

TTP can be employed to early distinguish C. tropicalis from other Candida species in patients with candidemia, which is extremely helpful to initiate empiric antifungal treatments to improve clinical outcomes.

The Effect of the Pandemic on Antifungal Use: What Has Changed?

Objective

During the COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial and antifungal stewardship programs have lost their priority. Although all parenteral antifungals were used with the recommendations of infectious diseases specialists in the pre-pandemic period, most consultations were delayed during the pandemic because of the workload of infectious diseases specialists. In this period, antifungal treatments in hospitalized patients were managed by mostly primary physicians. Therefore, we aimed to detect the change in the consumption of antifungals during the pandemic.

Materials and Methods

The data on the antifungal drug use by month and clinics, the number of beds, and the occupancy rate of the clinics were obtained from the hospital information registration system. We defined each drug according to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO ATC) coding system and determined the defined daily dose (DDD). The antifungal consumption (DDD/ 100 bed-days) in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods was compared.

Results

During the pandemic, the antifungal consumption increased two-fold (2019:7.43; 2020:18.03 DDD/100 bed-days). The highest antifungal consumption rate was in the hematology- oncology-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) clinics with 2.5-fold (2019:39.86; 2020:98.48 DDD/ 100 bed-days) increase. Liposomal amphotericin B consumption made up the majority of this with a four-fold increase in the hematology-oncology-HSCT clinics.

Conclusion

We detected a dramatic increase in antifungal consumption in both ICUs and inpatient clinics during pandemic. A novel antifungal stewardship approach is urgently needed.

Analysis of global antifungal surveillance results reveals predominance of Erg11 Y132F alteration among azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis and country-specific isolate dissemination

This study evaluated the activity of echinocandins, azoles and amphotericin B against Candida spp. isolates and other yeasts and characterised azole resistance mechanisms in Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis. Invasive Candida spp. isolates (n = 2936) collected in 60 hospitals worldwide during 2016-2017 underwent antifungal susceptibility testing by broth microdilution. Azole-resistant C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis were submitted to qPCR for ERG11, CDR1 and MDR1, and the whole genome sequence was analysed. Results of non-susceptibility to echinocandins ranged from 0.0-2.3%, being highest in Candida glabrata. More than 99.0% of the Candida albicans isolates were susceptible to both fluconazole and voriconazole. Fluconazole resistance in C. glabrata was 6.5% overall, being highest in the USA (13.0%). Resistance to voriconazole in Candida krusei was only noted in the USA (5.0%). Azoles inhibited 89.1-91.6% of C. parapsilosis isolates, with most resistant isolates noted in Europe (15.1%), including 36 isolates from Italy (three hospitals), of which 34 harboured Erg11 Y132F mutations and overexpressed MDR1. Azole non-wild-type C. tropicalis (7/227) were found in five countries: 3 isolates from Thailand had the same Erg11 Y132F alteration. Fluconazole non-wild-type isolates were noted among 3/77 (3.9%) Candida dubliniensis, 4/17 (23.5%) Candida guilliermondii, 4/47 (8.5%) Candida lusitaniae and other less common yeast species. Echinocandin use has been recommended over fluconazole for invasive Candida infections. However, azoles are still active against the most common Candida spp. and resistance appears to be restricted to certain geographic regions and associated with Erg11 Y132 alterations in C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis.

Serum 1,3-beta-d-glucan for antifungal treatment stratification at the intensive care unit and the influence of surgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a preemptive approach with serum 1,3-beta-d-glucan (BDG) as a marker for treatment stratification of systemic antifungal (AF) therapy in patients with clinical suspected invasive fungal infections (IFI) at intensive care units (ICU), and the impact of surgical procedures. A total of 66 ICU patients with clinical suspected IFI were included in this retrospective analysis. Serum BDG testing was performed prior to initiation of AF treatment and in addition to routine diagnostic measures. Based on the BDG results the initial clinical decision whether or not to start systemic AF therapy was re-evaluated. Impact of surgical procedures on clinical utility of serum BDG was evaluated in a sub-group of 25 patients who had undergone surgical procedures prior to BDG evaluation. BDG test results led to discontinuation of AF therapy in 13 patients, and initiation of AF therapy in seven patients. In 46 patients the clinical decision was confirmed by BDG. The majority of suspected, probable and proven IFI cases (10/13, 77%) was predicted by the test. BDG testing turned out positive in 9/25 (36%) of patients that had undergone recent surgery and levels correlated with clinical findings. Serum BDG evaluation seems to be a promising tool to guide AF therapy in ICU patients even after recent surgical procedures.

The Aspergillus fumigatus dihydroxyacid dehydratase Ilv3A/IlvC is required for full virulence

Dihydroxyacid dehydratase (DHAD) is a key enzyme in the branched-chain amino acid biosynthetic pathway that exists in a variety of organisms, including fungi, plants and bacteria, but not humans. In this study we identified four putative DHAD genes from the filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus by homology to Saccharomyces cerevisiae ILV3. Two of these genes, AFUA_2G14210 and AFUA_1G03550, initially designated AfIlv3A and AfIlv3B for this study, clustered in the same group as S. cerevisiae ILV3 following phylogenetic analysis. To investigate the functions of these genes, AfIlv3A and AfIlv3B were knocked out in A. fumigatus. Deletion of AfIlv3B gave no apparent phenotype whereas the Δilv3A strain required supplementation with isoleucine and valine for growth. Thus, AfIlv3A is required for branched-chain amino acid synthesis in A. fumigatus. A recombinant AfIlv3A protein derived from AFUA_2G14210 was shown to have DHAD activity in an in vitro assay, confirming that AfIlv3A is a DHAD. In addition we show that mutants lacking AfIlv3A and ilv3B exhibit reduced levels of virulence in murine infection models, emphasising the importance of branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis in fungal infections, and hence the potential of targeting this pathway with antifungal agents. Here we propose that AfIlv3A/AFUA_2G2410 be named ilvC.

Surviving the first hours in sepsis: getting the basics right (an intensivist's perspective)

Severe sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, claiming between 36 000 and 64 000 lives annually in the UK, with a mortality rate of 35%. International guidelines for the management of severe sepsis were published in 2004 by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and condensed into two Care Bundles. In 2010, the Campaign published results from its improvement programme showing that, although an absolute mortality reduction of 5.4% was seen over a 2 year period in line with increasing compliance with the Bundles, reliability was not achieved and Bundle compliance reached only 31%. This article explores current challenges in sepsis care and opportunities for further improvements. Basic care tasks [microbiological sampling and antibiotic delivery within 1 h, fluid resuscitation, and risk stratification using serum lactate (or alternative)] are likely to benefit patients most, yet are unreliably performed. Barriers include lack of awareness and robust process, the lack of supporting controlled trials, and complex diagnostic criteria leading to recognition delays. Reliable, timely delivery of more complex life-saving tasks (such as early goal-directed therapy) demands greater awareness, faster recognition and initiation of basic care, and more effective collaboration between clinicians and nurses on the front line, in critical care and in specialist support services, such as microbiology and infectious diseases. Organizations such as Survive Sepsis, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the Global Sepsis Alliance are working to raise awareness and promote further improvement initiatives. Future developments will focus on sepsis biomarkers and microarray techniques to rapidly screen for pathogens, risk stratification using genetic profiling, and the development of novel therapeutic agents targeting immunomodulation.

Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with intra-abdominal infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those previously published in 2002 and 2003. The guidelines are intended for treating patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. New information, based on publications from the period 2003-2008, is incorporated into this guideline document. The panel has also added recommendations for managing intra-abdominal infection in children, particularly where such management differs from that of adults; for appendicitis in patients of all ages; and for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.

Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection in Adults and Children: Guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with intra-abdominal infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those previously published in 2002 and 2003. The guidelines are intended for treating patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. New information, based on publications from the period 2003–2008, is incorporated into this guideline document. The panel has also added recommendations for managing intra-abdominal infection in children, particularly where such management differs from that of adults; for appendicitis in patients of all ages; and for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.