Comparison of duplex ultrasound with angiography in assessment of carotid bifurcation disease

Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of stroke and transient ischemic attack. Correctly and rapidly identifying patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis is essential for adequate treatment with early cerebral revascularization. Doubts about the diagnostic value regarding the accuracy of duplex ultrasound (DUS) and the possibility of using DUS as the single diagnostic test before carotid revascularization are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the accuracy of DUS in individuals with symptomatic carotid stenosis verified by either digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CRDTAS, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), ISI Web of Science, HTA, DARE, and LILACS up to 15 February 2021. We handsearched the reference lists of all included studies and other relevant publications and contacted experts in the field to identify additional studies or unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing DUS accuracy against an acceptable reference standard (DSA, MRA, or CTA) in symptomatic patients. We considered the classification of carotid stenosis with DUS defined with validated duplex velocity criteria, and the NASCET criteria for carotid stenosis measures on DSA, MRA, and CTA. We excluded studies that included < 70% of symptomatic patients; the time between the index test and the reference standard was longer than four weeks or not described, or that presented no objective criteria to estimate carotid stenosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 domain list. We extracted data with an effort to complete a 2 × 2 table (true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives) for each of the different categories of carotid stenosis and reference standards. We produced forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots to summarize the data. Where meta-analysis was possible, we used a bivariate meta-analysis model.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25,087 unique studies, of which 22 were deemed eligible for inclusion (4957 carotid arteries). The risk of bias varied considerably across the studies, and studies were generally of moderate to low quality. We narratively described the results without meta-analysis in seven studies in which the criteria used to determine stenosis were too different from the duplex velocity criteria proposed in our protocol or studies that provided insufficient data to complete a 2 × 2 table for at least in one category of stenosis. Nine studies (2770 carotid arteries) presented DUS versus DSA results for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, and two (685 carotid arteries) presented results from DUS versus CTA in this category. Seven studies presented results for occlusion with DSA as the reference standard and three with CTA as the reference standard. Five studies compared DUS versus DSA for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. Only one study presented results from 50% to 69% carotid artery stenosis. For DUS versus DSA, for < 50% carotid artery stenosis, the summary sensitivity was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.76) and the summary specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99); for the 50% to 69% range, only one study was included and meta-analysis not performed; for the 50% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and the summary specificity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.73); for the 70% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) and the summary specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90); for occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) and the summary specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.99). For sensitivity analyses, excluding studies in which participants were selected based on the presence of occlusion on DUS had an impact on specificity: 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). For DUS versus CTA, we found two studies in the range of 70% to 99%; the sensitivity varied from 0.57 to 0.94 and the specificity varied from 0.87 to 0.98. For occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) and the summary specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.99). For DUS versus MRA, there was one study with results for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) and specificity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.95); in the 70% to 99% range, two studies were included, with sensitivity that varied from 0.54 to 0.99 and specificity that varied from 0.78 to 0.89. We could perform only a few of the proposed sensitivity analyses because of the small number of studies included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that the diagnostic accuracy of DUS is high, especially at discriminating between the presence or absence of significant carotid artery stenosis (< 50% or 50% to 99%). This evidence, plus its less invasive nature, supports the early use of DUS for the detection of carotid artery stenosis. The accuracy for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis and occlusion is high. Clinicians should exercise caution when using DUS as the single preoperative diagnostic method, and the limitations should be considered. There was little evidence of the accuracy of DUS when compared with CTA or MRA. The results of this review should be interpreted with caution because they are based on studies of low methodological quality, mainly due to the patient selection method. Methodological problems in participant inclusion criteria from the studies discussed above apparently influenced an overestimated estimate of prevalence values. Most of the studies included failed to precisely describe inclusion criteria and previous testing. Future diagnostic accuracy studies should include direct comparisons of the various modalities of diagnostic tests (mainly DUS, CTA, and MRA) for carotid artery stenosis since DSA is no longer considered to be the best method for diagnosing carotid stenosis and less invasive tests are now used as reference standards in clinical practice. Also, for future studies, the participant inclusion criteria require careful attention.

Carotid Endarterectomy Based on Duplex Ultrasonography: A Safe Approach Associated with Long-term Stroke Prevention

To evaluate the short-term and long-term safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) based on duplex ultrasound without confirmatory diagnostic arteriography.

A 4-year retrospective review of CEA based on duplex ultrasound alone (n = 653) or with confirmatory arteriography (n = 118) was performed in 244 women and 458 men whose ages ranged from 39 to 92 years (mean, 70 years). Practice patterns, perioperative morbidity, and stroke rate (life-table analysis) of a community-based and university- based vascular surgical practice were analyzed and compared.

Surgical intervention based on duplex ultrasound was judged possible in 85% of the patients (community, 93%; university, 55%). Indications for arteriography included: testing completed prior to surgical consultation (44%), nonfocal extracranial carotid stenosis (23%), nonhemispheric symptoms (13%), and prior stroke (9%). This approach was safe (with a combined operative mortality and neurologic morbidity of 1.8%), asso ciated with long-term stroke prevention (a 95% stroke-free survival at 4 years), and yielded results similar to CEA with arteriography (operative morbidity, 2.6%; 91% stroke- free survival). The incidence and nature of late neurologic deficits were similar after CEA with and without arteriography. Twenty-three (4%) of the patients who underwent CEA based on duplex ultrasound developed late neurologic symptoms including 9 contralat eral and 4 ipsilateral strokes; and 4 ipsilateral and 4 contralateral transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Cardiac embolism from atrial fibrillation accounted for 6 strokes, lacunar infarct associated with hypertension (3 strokes), intracranial atherosclerosis (3 strokes), and contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion (1 stroke). Forty patients (6.8%) died predominantly from cardiac events. After CEA with arteriography 6 (5%) of the patients died. Six late strokes (4 contralateral, and 2 ipsilateral hemisphere) occurred as a result of progressive, untreated ICA stenosis (n = 3), and lacunar infarct (n = 3). Overall, 11% of the patients underwent contralateral CEA for progressive ICA stenosis.

CEA, based on duplex scanning, is safe and applicable for the majority of patients undergoing surgical evaluation. Short-term and long-term outcomes were similar to outcomes in patients having CEA based on diagnostic arteriography.

Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque surface irregularities and correlation to cerebrovascular symptoms

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether surface irregularities measured from ultrasound images of carotid artery plaques and quantified using a novel method, correlate with the presence of ipsilateral hemispheric cerebrovascular symptoms.

Methods

A plaque surface irregularity index (SII) was measured in 47 carotid artery plaques (32 subjects, stenosis range 10% -95%, 49% symptomatic) using ultrasound image sequences spanning several cardiac cycles. The differences in the distribution of SII in plaques with ipsilateral hemispheric symptoms versus those without symptoms and the correlation between the SII of plaques and the degrees of stenosis of the corresponding arteries were assessed. Diagnostic performance of plaque SII was evaluated on its own and in combination with the degree of stenosis.

Results

The mean SII was significantly greater for plaques with ipsilateral hemispheric symptoms (1.89 radians/mm) than for asymptomatic plaques (1.67 radians/mm, p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant association between the SII and the degree of stenosis (p = 0.30). SII predicted the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms with an accuracy of 66% (sensitivity 65%, specificity 67%) on its own and with an accuracy of 83% (sensitivity 96%, specificity 71%) in combination with the degree of stenosis.

Conclusions

Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque surface irregularities using a novel SII parameter correlates with the presence ipsilateral hemispheric cerebrovascular symptoms and may increase diagnostic performance beyond that provided by the degree of stenosis.

Carotid arteries: contrast-enhanced US angiography--preliminary clinical experience

B-mode ultrasonographic (US) angiography enhanced with a microbubble-based US contrast agent (FS069) was evaluated in human subjects with carotid artery disease. Results at contrast material-enhanced US angiography and duplex US were compared with those at conventional angiography. Both US angiography and duplex US accurately depicted stenoses of 70% or more compared with those depicted at conventional angiography. The percentage diameter stenosis of the internal carotid artery measured at US angiography strongly correlated with that measured at conventional angiography (r = 0.988). The percentage area stenosis measured at US angiography strongly correlated with ex vivo measurements of the resected carotid plaque at magnetic resonance imaging (r = 0.979). US angiography depicted unsuspected wall irregularities, ulceration, and dissection.

Is insulin sensitivity a causal intermediate in the relationship between alcohol consumption and carotid atherosclerosis?: the insulin resistance and atherosclerosis study

OBJECTIVE

A J-shaped association has been demonstrated between alcohol consumption and atherosclerosis. Insulin resistance, also a risk factor for atherosclerosis, has been shown to have a similar J-shaped association with alcohol intake. This raises the question of whether insulin sensitivity (S(I)) is a causal intermediate in the alcohol-atherosclerosis relationship.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study was a multicenter cohort study designed to investigate relationships among S(I), risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and carotid artery atherosclerosis. Using regression analysis, we tested whether adjustment for S(I) attenuated the alcohol-atherosclerosis relationship observed at baseline.

RESULTS

A J-shaped association was observed between alcohol consumption and common carotid artery intimal medial thickness. The protective aspect of the alcohol-atherosclerosis relationship was attenuated by 25% after the adjustment for S(I). However, an interaction was observed between alcohol consumption and glucose tolerance (GT) status. In comparison with never drinkers, all levels of alcohol consumption were associated with less atherosclerosis in participants with normal GT status. Participants with impaired GT status (but not diabetes) demonstrated a J-shaped alcohol-atherosclerosis association. All levels of alcohol consumption were associated with more atherosclerosis in participants with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

S(I) may be a causal intermediate at protective levels of alcohol intake, but an alcohol-GT interaction precluded a definitive conclusion. Moderate alcohol consumption may increase the risk of atherosclerosis in people with diabetes. These findings contrast with previous reports and do not support current recommendations regarding moderate alcohol consumption in people with diabetes. More research is needed to clarify this issue.

Contrast-enhanced B-mode US angiography in the assessment of experimental in vivo and in vitro atherosclerotic disease

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to (a) test the hypothesis that filling the arterial lumen with echoes at B-mode ultrasound (US) enables the assessment of wall and luminal abnormalities and (b) compare contrast material-enhanced B-mode US with color and power Doppler US angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Atherosclerotic lesions were created in 14 rabbit aortas and imaged with color Doppler and B-mode US before and after the intravenous administration of 0.3 mL of AF0150, a US contrast agent. In addition, four replicas of diseased human carotid arteries were immersed in a tissue-mimicking phantom and imaged with B-mode and color and power Doppler US before and after the administration of 1 mL of AF0150 per liter of porcine blood. Radiopaque plastic casts of the rabbit aortas and contact radiographs of the plastic replicas served as standards.

RESULTS

Although color and power Doppler US allowed immediate localization of the lumen, precise estimation of stenoses and reliable visualization of surface irregularities were not possible. After AF0150 administration, angiogram-like images of the lumen were created with B-mode US, allowing rapid assessment of the entire vessel lumen and wall. Consequently, luminal stenoses were more accurately measured than with unenhanced B-mode US (r2 = 0.94, P < .0001 vs r2 = 0.21, P = .25) or Doppler (r2 = 0.42, P < .03). In addition, plaques and ulcerations were visible only with contrast-enhanced B-mode US.

CONCLUSION

Microbubbles fill the arterial lumen with echoes at B-mode US, creating an angiogram-like image. The ability to visualize the inner and outer surfaces of the vascular wall improved the evaluation of luminal and wall abnormalities.

Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The accuracy of routine ultrasonography in detecting severe carotid artery stenosis was evaluated in comparison with cerebral angiography. The precision of ultrasonographic criteria in predicting the risk of stroke was also assessed.

METHODS

A total of 1011 symptomatic carotid bifurcations were studied in patients from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). Given that all patients were considered for entry into the trial, the chance of a verification bias affecting the analyses was minimized. The ultrasonographic data consisted of peak systolic velocities and frequency changes from both the internal and common carotid arteries. Angiographic stenosis was calculated as in NASCET. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed from the ultrasonographic data for the detection of 70% or greater stenosis on the basis of an angiographic assessment. Kaplan-Meier stroke-free survival curves were used to predict the risk of stroke.

RESULTS

The areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.74 to 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.79). The sensitivities and specificities ranged from 0.65 to 0.71. The risk of stroke at 18 months declined sharply as the degree of angiographically defined stenosis declined from 99% to 70%. No pattern of decline was apparent on the basis of the ultrasonographic data.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the accuracy of ultrasonography is moderate when flow parameters are used to assess the degree of stenosis. Ultrasonography should be used as a screening tool to exclude patients with no carotid artery disease from further testing. Conventional angiography remains an essential investigation before assigning the risk of stroke and deciding appropriate treatment for extracranial carotid artery disease.

Carotid endarterectomy after noninvasive evaluation by duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography

Recent studies documenting the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in selected patients provide further impetus for developing noninvasive techniques to evaluate carotid occlusive disease. Eliminating the morbidity due to preoperative angiography would further refine the treatment of this condition. Recent improvements and greater experience with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of extracranial vessels have increased the accuracy of this technique. We present our experience using MRA in combination with duplex ultrasonography as the primary mode of preoperative evaluation for CEA. Fifty-two patients referred for CEA underwent these two studies. In 47 patients (90%), significant stenosis (> 70%) was unambiguously identified on both ultrasound and MRA. Forty-one of these patients underwent CEA on the basis of these studies alone, without conventional angiography. In all of these cases, significant stenosis was identified at the time of surgery (100%), and CEA was performed without difficulty or complications. In five cases (9.6%), the MRA and ultrasound findings did not concur exactly. In three of these cases, the interpretation of the two studies differed with respect to the severity of stenosis; in the others, one of the studies was indeterminate. These patients underwent conventional angiography before surgery. Our experience suggests that the combined use of MRA and ultrasonography affords an accurate noninvasive evaluation of carotid occlusive disease sufficient for surgical planning in most cases.