Intralesional steroid injection in benign esophageal strictures resistant to bougie dilation

The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Outcomes for Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures Using a Novel Combination of Needle-Knife Stricturoplasty, Balloon Dilation, and Steroid Injection (with Video)

Background and Aims

Benign esophageal strictures often present with dysphagia and can significantly impair a patient's quality of life, especially when refractory to standard endoscopic techniques. When repeat dilations fail to achieve an adequate luminal diameter or resolve dysphagia, further therapy with needle-knife or steroid injections is needed. However, patients can still clinically fail. To manage such strictures, we employed a novel combination of all three techniques.

Methods

Single-center case series of adult patients with benign strictures that were refractory to conventional endoscopic therapy and removable self-expanding metal stenting. Primary clinical success was defined as complete resolution in dysphagia. Secondary outcomes included periodic dilation index (frequency of dilations over the follow-up time), esophageal diameter changes, technical success, and complications.

Results

Four patients (median age 49.7 years old, interquartile range [IQR] 30-59) underwent endoscopic therapy for complex, benign strictures using our triple therapy technique. Etiologies of the strictures included peptic strictures (n = 3) and an anastomotic stricture (n = 1). There was 100% technical success rate with no associated adverse events. There was a 50% clinical success rate, with 1 additional patient having partial improvement in dysphagia. The median diameter of the esophagus before and after triple therapy was 3.2 mm (IQR 3.5-5.5) and 12.8 mm (IQR 11.7-14.2), respectively. The periodic dilation index was 6.3 before and 1.5 after triple therapy. The median length of follow-up was 362.5 days.

Conclusion

Triple combination therapy may be useful in benign strictures that are refractory to standard techniques. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Efficacy of a patient with scar constitution combined with corrosive esophageal strictures after different endoscopic therapies

Oral corrosive substances can cause esophageal or gastrointestinal strictures, leading to malnutrition and gastrointestinal dysfunction, directly affecting the patients' quality of life. The aim of the case was to compare the efficacy of different endoscopic therapy methods.

Endoscopic Stricturotomy in the Treatment of Refractory Esophageal Anastomotic Strictures

Refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures are a frequent challenge for endoscopists. The current therapeutic strategies have a significant restenosis rate, and patients usually require repeated sessions and suffer from dysphagia. Therefore, we propose a modified method named endoscopic stricturotomy (ES) to treat refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures. The patients diagnosed with refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures were enrolled in the cohort study. The method of ES is to incise longitudinally only a single strip of mucosa at the most prominent part of fibrotic scar and completely cut fibrotic tissues under the mucosa. The primary endpoint was the times of endoscopic therapies. The secondary endpoints include the effective rate, success rate, recurrence rate, endoscopic treatment intervals, complications, length of hospital stay, and surgical cost. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months after ES. The median anastomotic diameter of 12 patients was 2 mm (range 1 to 4 mm). Dysphagia were dramatically relieved in all patients (dysphagia grade from 3 to 1), the effective rate was 100%. During the follow-up, the 12 patients received a total number of 38 sessions, and the median number of ES sessions was 2.5 (1-9), and the success rate were 83%. Nine of the patients (75%) developed restenosis during follow-up, with a median interval of 38 days (15-315 days). No complications occurred during treatment and following up. The median hospital stay was 2 days (2-2.9 days), and the hospitalization costs was 3887.4 RMB (3632.8 RMB-4116.9 RMB). ES seems to be an effective treatment modality for refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures. Large prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility and its place in the management of refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures (ChiCTR2000032997).

Appropriate duration of endoscopic dilation for postoperative benign esophageal strictures

BACKGROUND

Benign esophageal strictures are a frequent complication after esophageal surgery or extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopic dilation is the preferred treatment in clinical practice. However, the allocation of time for each dilation is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriate duration of endoscopic dilation for benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

Patients with benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection between July 2010 and July 2018 were retrospectively included in this study. According to the dilation time (1, 3, 5 min), patients were divided into three groups. The clinical effects and adverse events were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Altogether, 57 patients, including 21 in the 1-min group, 18 in the 3-min group and 18 in the 5-min group, were included. All patients underwent endoscopic treatment successfully. The stricture recurrence rate was 76.19% in the 1-min group, 55.56% in the 3-min group and 61.11% in the 5-min group. The median overall dysphagia-free period was 2.60 (range, 0.80-12.00) months in the 1-min group, 6.60 (range, 1.80-12.00) months in the 3-min group and 6.25 (range, 2.40-12.00) months in the 5-min group (P < 0.05). For patients who developed stricture recurrence, the mean dysphagia-free periods were 2.26  ±  1.27 months, 4.00  ±  1.76 months and 4.23  ±  1.63 months, respectively (P < 0.05). The dysphagia-free periods were comparable between the 3- and 5-min groups and were longer than those in the 1-min group. Muscle layer damage occurred in two patients (11.11%) in the 5-min group and in no patients in the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

Three minutes was considered a safe and effective dilation duration for benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Assessment of long-term results of repeated dilations and impact of a scheduled program of dilations for refractory esophageal strictures: a retrospective case-control study

INTRODUCTION

In patients with benign and refractory esophageal strictures (BES), repeating initial dilations in short intervals could be recommended, but little data are available to validate this strategy. Our aim was to evaluate long-term results of a scheduled program of repeated and sustained esophageal dilations in patients with refractory strictures.

METHODS

Patients with BES requiring five or more dilations were retrospectively included and divided in two groups for analysis: a SCHEDULED group (SDG) where patients were systematically rescheduled for the 5 first dilations; ON-DEMAND group (ODG) where patients were dilated only in case of recurrence of the dysphagia. Comparison between SDG and ODG was done with a 1:1 matching analysis and etiology of stricture. Clinical success was defined as the absence of dysphagia for more than a year.

RESULTS

39 patients with refractory BES were included with post-operative stenosis in 51.2% and post-caustic injury 28.2%; 10 were in SDG and 29 in ODG. In overall analysis (39 patients), the follow-up was 64.4 ± 32 months, success rate was 79.5% and duration of treatment was 27.3 ± 20 months, and mean number of dilations was 11.7 per patient. The need for dilations decreased significantly after 18 months of treatment with an average of 0.56 dilations per semester. Self-expandable metallic stent insertion was associated with an increased rate of complications (5.9% vs 59.1% p = 0.001). In matched analysis (10 ODG vs 10 SDG patients), the duration of treatment was lower in SDG (18.8 vs 41.4 months, p = 0,032) with a higher probability of remission (survival analysis, Log-rank: p = 0,019) and the success rate did not differ between ODG and SDG patients (80% vs 90%; NS).

CONCLUSION

Overall, long-term esophageal dilations resulted in a 79.5% success rate and the need for further dilatations decreased significantly in both groups after 18-month follow-up. A scheduled dilation program was associated with a higher probability of final success and lower treatment duration.

Utility of radial incision and cutting with steroid injection for refractory stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) may cause esophageal stricture and related dysphagia symptoms, especially when the lesion is widespread. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the prior choice to treat post-ESD stricture. However, certain patients show poor response to EBD treatment and frequent dilations are required. We perform radial incision and cutting combined with intralesional steroid injection to manage refractory stricture. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new combined treatment.

METHODS

From October 2017 to February 2019, 25 patients who accepted repeated EBD because of refractory stricture after extensive ESD for large SESCC were enrolled. Radial incision and cutting followed by local steroid injection was performed on all the patients, and therapeutic EBD was conducted to treat recurring stricture after combined treatment. The incidence of recurrent stricture, clinical outcome of combined treatment, and following therapeutic EBD, procedure-related adverse events were assessed and analyzed.

RESULTS

During the follow-ups, the incidence of recurrent esophageal strictures was 92%. Combined treatment reduced the severity of stenosis and lowered the corresponding dysphagia scores significantly, compared with previous EBD. Mean symptom-relief duration of EBD was prolonged significantly from 29.9 to 76.0 days. Perforation was observed in one patient during operation and successfully sealed with metal clips.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of radial incision and cutting with steroid injection is a safe and feasible treatment for esophageal refractory stricture after extensive ESD, appearing to improve the therapeutic EBD outcome and maintain a longer symptom-relief duration.

The Safety of Intralesional Steroid Injections in Young Children and Their Effectiveness in Anastomotic Esophageal Strictures-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Intralesional steroid injections (ISI) are a widely used technique for various pediatric indications and represent a possible adjuvant treatment for anastomotic esophageal strictures. Yet, no consensus has been reached neither on their safety in the pediatric population or their effectiveness in esophageal atresia patients. This systematic review aimed to assess the safety of ISI in young children through a meta-analysis and to summarize the current knowledge on the effectiveness of ISI in anastomotic esophageal strictures.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar up to August 16 2021. Studies focusing on ISI and involving children up to 2 years were included in the meta-analysis for the safety assessment. All studies evaluating the use of ISI as adjuvant treatment in anastomotic esophageal strictures in children were included in the systematic review to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 8,253 articles. A total of 57 studies were included, of which 55 for the safety and five for the effectiveness assessment. The overall complication rate was 7%, with a greater incidence of local complications compared to systemic complications. Six studies (with a total of 367 patients) evaluated adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels, of which four reported hypothalamic-pituitary axis suppression. Two children (0.6%) received replacement therapy and all patients recovered uneventfully. A mean number of 1.67 ISI were performed per esophageal atresia (EA) patient. A reduction of needed dilatations was seen after ISI, compared to the number of dilatations performed before the intervention (5.2 vs. 1.3).

CONCLUSION

The insufficient data emphasized the need for further prospective and comparative studies. Results from this meta-analysis and systematic review address ISI as a safe and effective technique. Close clinical follow-up and growth curve evaluation are advisable in patients receiving ISI.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021281584.

Intralesional steroids and endoscopic dilation for anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures are difficult to treat. The impact of adding local steroid injection to endoscopic dilation for the treatment of post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of performing steroid injection in addition to dilation.

METHODS

A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to January 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of endoscopic dilation plus either local steroid injection (steroid group) or saline injection (placebo group) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Three RCTs were eligible for the final analysis: 72 patients (mean age 61.3 years, 74 % male) in the steroid group and 72 patients (mean age 59.6 years, 71 % male) in the placebo group. The mean number of dilations required to resolve the stricture was significantly lower in the steroid group compared with the placebo group, with a mean weighted difference of -1.62 (95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.73 to -0.50; P = 0.004). After 6 months of follow-up, there was a trend toward more patients in the steroid group remaining dysphagia free compared with the placebo group, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.36 (95 %CI 0.94 to 5.91; P = 0.07, I2  = 24 %).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that the addition of local steroid injection at the time of dilation for benign anastomotic strictures led to a significant decrease in the number of procedures required to resolve the stricture and may well reduce dysphagia symptoms during follow-up.

Intralesional Steroid Injection Therapy for Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Following Esophageal Atresia Repair

OBJECTIVES

The role of intralesional steroid injection (ISI) in the treatment of anastomotic stricture in patients with esophageal atresia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISI.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients with esophageal atresia with at least 1 ISI for the treatment of esophageal anastomotic stricture between 2010 and 2017 were identified. The change in stricture diameter (ΔD) was compared between procedures with dilation alone (ISI-) and dilation with steroid injection (ISI+).

RESULTS

A total of 1055 balloon dilations were performed (452 ISI+). The median ΔD was significantly greater in the ISI+ group: 1 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0, 3) versus 0 mm (IQR -1, 1.5) (P < 0.0001). The ISI+ group had greater percentage of improved diameter (P < 0.0001) and lesser percentages of unchanged and decreased diameters at subsequent endoscopy (P = 0.0009, P = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the significance of ISI on increasing the likelihood of improved stricture diameter with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.24 (95% confidence interval: 2.15-4.88) (P < 0.001). The ΔD for the first 3 ISI+ procedures was greater than the ΔD for subsequent ISI+ procedures: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) versus 0.5 mm (IQR-1.25, 2) (P = 0.001). There was no difference in perforation incidence between ISI+ and ISI- groups (P = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

ISI with dilation was well tolerated and improved anastomotic stricture diameter more than dilation alone. The benefit of ISI over dilation alone was limited to the first 3 ISI procedures.

Roles of Steroids in Preventing Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Resection

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES

Endoscopic resection has been worldwide recognized as a treatment strategy for early esophageal lesions. The occurrence of esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection will reduce the quality of life of patients. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of steroids in the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection and the influence of different steroid administration methods.

METHODS

In the relevant literature database, literature from 2008 to 2018 is retrieved by using preset keywords, the search results are carefully screened, and the conclusion of the literature is synthesized to form arguments and draw conclusions.

RESULTS

73 articles met our requirements. Oral steroid administration, not prophylactic endoscopic balloon dilation alone, was effective in preventing esophagostenosis after esophagoscopic treatment and reducing the number of repeated endoscopic balloon dilations even after extensive endoscopic resection. Local steroid injection is useful and economy for preventing esophageal stricture, even though it may raise the risk of perforation during dilations. A wider range of circumferential mucosal defects is an independent predictor for stricture formation for patents given preventive steroid injections after endoscopic submucosal dissection. For complete circular mucosal defect, the further researches are essential to investigate the role of local steroid injection. The effect of other methods such as steroid gel, intravenous infusion of steroid, and novel steroid filling methods require more confirmation.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, steroids play an irreplaceable role in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. Oral and local injections of steroids are the two most acceptable methods and more prospective studies are needed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two methods.

Esophageal caustic injuries in pediatrics: a sobering global health issue

Caustic material ingestion by children is considered a global healthcare issue, especially in low-to-middle income countries. The aim of this article was to review the epidemiology, prevention, and management of caustic material ingestion in pediatric patients, comparing low-to-middle income countries with high-income countries. We conducted an English literature review using PubMed with the following keywords: (caustic OR corrosive) AND ingestion AND (pediatric OR pediatric). Our search retrieved 253 citations; all abstracts were screened by the authors, and 52 articles were finally included in our review. Prevention is key in tackling this issue, but legislation is scarce in low-to-middle income countries. Diagnosis of caustic ingestion is mostly achieved using flexible endoscopy, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound, but access is limited in low-to middle income countries and diagnosis is often delayed. After stabilizing patients, the mainstay of treatment is graded endoscopic dilatation, and rarely, esophageal replacement. We concluded that caustic ingestion represents a serious condition where prevention is the key. Once a child suffers an injury, rapid and careful evaluation of the injury with endoscopy, and a course of close observation and dilations if needed, will often avoid esophageal replacement. When necessary, the stomach is the best first option if it is viable, followed by the colon, and finally, the jejunum.

Effectiveness of an orally administered steroid gel at preventing restenosis after endoscopic balloon dilation of benign esophageal stricture

BACKGROUND

Restenosis occurs in 10% to 30% of patients after endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) of benign esophageal stricture. This study aimed to investigate whether an orally administered steroid/gel mixture would inhibit restenosis after EBD for benign esophageal stricture.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with benign esophageal stricture treated with EBD at the Peking University Third Hospital, China (September 2005 to October 2017). The patients were divided into an EBD alone group (EBD only) and EBD/OHA group (EBD plus oral hydrocortisone sodium succinate/aluminum phosphate gel mixture). Patients were followed-up for 3 months. EBD was repeated for persistent dysphagia. The outcome measures included the restenosis rate and the number of additional EBD sessions required during follow-up. Any side effects were noted.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included (EBD alone group, n = 12; EBD/OHA group, n = 20). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (including age, sex, etiology, stricture location, and diameter of narrowest segment) did not differ between groups. Restenosis rate was significantly lower in the EBD/OHA group than in the EBD alone group (5/20, 25.0% vs 8/12, 66.7%; P = .025). The median number of EBD sessions required was numerically lower in the EBD/OHA group (median, 1.0; interquartile range, 1.0-1.8) than in the EBD alone group (median 2.0, interquartile ranged 1.0-2.5), but statistical significance was not attained (P = .071). The only side effects occurred in the EBD/OHA group: hypokalemia in 4/20 (20.0%) and apathy/somnolence in 1/20 (5.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

An orally administered steroid/gel mixture might reduce the incidence of restenosis after EBD for benign esophageal stricture, but it requires confirmation by prospective trials.

Biodegradable Stents in Resistant Peptic Oesophageal Stricture: Is It the Right Way to Go?

Peptic oesophageal stricture can be considered as the end result of prolonged gastro-oesophageal reflux. The 'gold standard' treatment for peptic stricture is endoscopic dilatation with balloon or bougie. It is predicted that up to 40% of patients remain symptomatic with dysphagia due to refractory (resistant to treatment) or recurrent strictures, needing frequent interventions at short intervals. Such patients have poor nutritional status due to the primary disease and are susceptible to complications related to repeated endoscopic dilatation such as bleeding and perforation. This general review aims to analyse existing published evidence and address the role of biodegradable stents in resistant peptic strictures as an alternative treatment to provide long-term dysphagia-free intervals.

PRISMA - Practical meta-analysis of applying local triamcinolone acetonide injection for stenosis after esophageal cancer surgery

Objectives

To explore the practical method of endoscopic triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection immediately after endoscopic surgery and combined with endoscopic dilation (ED) in the management of stenosis after esophageal cancer surgery based on their efficacy and safety.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for possible controlled studies. Meta-analyses of the included studies were completed using Reviewer Manager software and were reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Results

Eight randomized studies and five controlled studies containing 575 patients were obtained. In five studies (n=282), TA injected after surgery reduced the risk of stenosis (risk difference [RD] =-0.51, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.39], P<0.01) and the required ED sessions (RD =-3.66, 95% CI [-5.87, -1.46], P<0.01). In eight studies (n=293), TA injection combined with ED reduced the risk of recurrence of stenosis (RD =-0.28, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.08], P<0.01) and the required ED sessions (RD =-0.71, 95% CI [-1.39, -0.04], P<0.05). TA injection therapy did not increase the risk of complications in seven studies (n=380; RD =-0.01, 95% CI [-0.04, 0.02], P=0.53) compared with control.

Conclusion

TA injection therapy after esophageal cancer surgery and combined with ED are both effective and safe in the management of stenosis, as they reduce the risk of stenosis and sequentially the required ED sessions without increasing complications.

Endoscopic balloon dilation and submucosal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of esophageal stricture: A single-center retrospective study

Effect and prognosis of endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with submucosal triamcinolone acetonide on treating benign esophageal lesions were explored. This retrospective study included patients with esophageal stricture treated in the Department of Gastroenterology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from March 2012 to March 2015. Enrolled patients were divided into the treatment and control group depending on the therapy differences. Endoscopic balloon dilation combined with submucosal injection of triamcinolone acetonide was performed in the treatment group and the endoscopic balloon dilatation was performed in the control group. In addition, the treatment group was further divided into the <16- and >16-mm subgroup according to the degree of balloon dilatation. During 1-year follow-up, changes of esophageal stenosis, esophageal stenosis recurrence rate, postoperative complications and adverse reactions were observed and analyzed. The improvement of esophageal stenosis of the treatment group was significantly superior to that of the control group at 2 and 4 months after operation, respectively (P=0.002, 0.013). The esophageal stenosis recurrence rate was 62.2 and 77.2% in the treatment and control group, respectively (P=0.027); the recurrence time of stenosis was 101.4±8.6 days in the treatment group and 75.4±5.2 days in the control group (P=0.006). Additionally, the recurrence time of esophageal stenosis was significantly shorter in the >16-mm subgroup compared with that of the <16-mm subgroup (P<0.001). Endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of esophageal stricture had a better therapeutic effect than that of the simple balloon dilatation, which was more effective when the balloon dilatation was >16 mm. It could significantly prolong the recurrence time of esophageal stricture.

Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Followed By Intralesional Steroid Injection for Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is a standard treatment for anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy, and requires multiple dilations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of adding a steroid injection to EBD to reduce restricture.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive EBD combined with either triamcinolone or placebo injection. The primary endpoint was the number of dilations required to resolve the stricture. The secondary endpoints were restricture-free survival and adverse events. Patients with a dysphagia symptom score of ≥2 after esophagectomy with an endoscopy-confirmed anastomotic stricture were included. A total of 50 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (50 mg/5 mL) or an identical volume of normal saline solution as a placebo was injected per site using a 25-gauge needle immediately after EBD. Both the patient and treating physician were blinded to the treatment given.

RESULTS

During the 4-year study period, 65 patients were randomized to either the steroid group (n = 33) or placebo group (n = 32). The median number of EBDs required to resolve strictures was 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-2.5) in the steroid group and 4.0 (interquartile range, 2.0-6.8) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). After 6 months of follow-up, 39% of patients who had received steroid injections remained recurrence free compared with 16% of those who had received saline injections (p = 0.002). No adverse events occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid injection shows promising results for the prevention of stricture recurrence in patients who underwent EBD for anastomotic strictures.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Intralesional Triamcinolone Injection for Benign Esophageal Strictures

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic intralesional triamcinolone injection (ITI) for benign esophageal strictures combined with endoscopic dilation (ED).

Methods

Online databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched for prospective randomized control trials (RCTs) between 1966 and March 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration.

Results

Six RCTs consisting of 176 patients were selected. Meta-analysis results showed that additional ITI had a significant advantage in terms of stricture rate and required ED sessions. Surgery-related and non-surgery-related strictures showed similar results. Additional ITI was not associated with significantly increased risk of complications.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis showed that additional ITI therapy was supposed to be effective and safe for benign esophageal strictures as it reduced the stricture rate and required ED sessions. However, more RCTs are necessary to support these findings.

Intralesional steroid is beneficial in benign refractory esophageal strictures: A meta-analysis

AIM

To analyze the effect of intralesional steroid injections in addition to endoscopic dilation of benign refractory esophageal strictures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in three databases from inception to 10 April 2017 to identify trials, comparing the efficacy of endoscopic dilation to dilation combined with intralesional steroid injections. Following the data extraction, meta-analytical calculations were performed on measures of outcome by the random-effects method of DerSimonian and Laird. Heterogeneity of the studies was tested by Cochrane's Q and I2 statistics. Risk of quality and bias was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and JADAD assessment tools.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were identified suitable for analyses, involving 343 patients, 235 cases and 229 controls in total. Four studies used crossover design with 121 subjects enrolled. The periodic dilation index (PDI) was comparable in 4 studies, where the pooled result showed a significant improvement of PDI in the steroid group (MD: -1.12 dilation/month, 95%CI: -1.99 to -0.25 P = 0.012; I2 = 74.4%). The total number of repeat dilations (TNRD) was comparable in 5 studies and showed a non-significant decrease (MD: -1.17, 95%CI: -0.24-0.05, P = 0.057; I2 = 0), while the dysphagia score (DS) was comparable in 5 studies and did not improve (SMD: 0.35, 95%CI: -0.38, 1.08, P = 0.351; I2 = 83.98%) after intralesional steroid injection.

CONCLUSION

Intralesional steroid injection increases the time between endoscopic dilations of benign refractory esophageal strictures. However, its potential role needs further research.

UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice

These are updated guidelines which supersede the original version published in 2004. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG. The original guidelines have undergone extensive revision by the 16 members of the Guideline Development Group with representation from individuals across all relevant disciplines, including the Heartburn Cancer UK charity, a nursing representative and a patient representative. The methodological rigour and transparency of the guideline development processes were appraised using the revised Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.Dilatation of the oesophagus is a relatively high-risk intervention, and is required by an increasing range of disease states. Moreover, there is scarcity of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians on how to safely perform this procedure. These guidelines deal specifically with the dilatation procedure using balloon or bougie devices as a primary treatment strategy for non-malignant narrowing of the oesophagus. The use of stents is outside the remit of this paper; however, for cases of dilatation failure, alternative techniques-including stents-will be listed. The guideline is divided into the following subheadings: (1) patient preparation; (2) the dilatation procedure; (3) aftercare and (4) disease-specific considerations. A systematic literature search was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Develop-ment and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of recommendations made.

Lumen-apposing metal stents for benign gastrointestinal tract strictures: An international multicenter experience

AIM

To investigate technical feasibility, outcomes and adverse events of the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) for benign gastrointestinal (GI) tract strictures.

METHODS

Between July 2015 and January 2017, patients undergoing treatment by LAMS for benign GI strictures at three tertiary referral centers were included in this study. Primary outcomes included technical success, short-term clinical success, long-term clinical success, and adverse events. Short-term clinical success was defined as symptom resolution at 30 d after stent placement. Long-term clinical success was defined by symptom resolution at 60 d in patients who continued to have indwelling stent, or continued symptom resolution at 30 d after elective stent removal.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients (mean age 62.6 years, 47.6% males) underwent placement of LAMS for benign GI strictures. A 15 mm × 10 mm LAMS was placed in 16 patients, a 10 mm × 10 mm LAMS was placed in 2 patients, and a 16 mm × 30 mm LAMS was placed in 3 patients. Technical success was obtained in all cases. Short-term clinical success was achieved in 19 out of 21 cases (90.5%), and long-term clinical success was achieved in 12 out of 18 (66.7%). Mean (range) stent indwell time was 107.2 (28-370) d. After a mean (range) dwell time of 104.3 (28-306) d, 9 LAMSs were removed due to the following complications: ulceration at stent site (n = 1), angulation (n = 2), migration (n = 4) and stricture overgrowth (n = 2). Migration occurred in 4 cases (19.0%), and it was associated with stricture resolution in one case. Median (range) follow-up period was 119 (31-422) d.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of LAMS for benign strictures has shown to be technically feasible and safe, but adverse events highlight the need for further study of its indications.

The Efficacy of Intralesional Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Corrosive Esophageal Strictures in Children

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Esophageal dilatation can be insufficient in the treatment of severe corrosive esophageal strictures. In this study, we aimed to present the efficacy of intralesional steroid injection as an adjunct to dilatation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of children who underwent intralesional steroid injection between 2004 and 2014 was performed. Patients' age, type of corrosive substance, length of stricture, number of injection and dilatation sessions and complications were reviewed. The success was evaluated by the comparison of number, frequency, and requirement of dilatation therapy before and after injection.

RESULTS

Intralesional steroid injection was performed to 32 children with a mean age of 3.6±2.5 years. The types of corrosive agents were alkali (24) or acid (8). Mean number of injection sessions was 2.5±1.1(1 to 6). Mean number of dilatation sessions was decreased from 10±8.8 to 5.4±4.6 after injection (P=0.003). Mean frequency of dilatations was extended from 3.6±0.9 weeks to 8.7±3.9 weeks (P=0.000). Dilatation treatment was successfully terminated in 25 of 27 children with short-segment strictures after injection (92%). Whereas all of the children with long-segment strictures could not resolved and finally required esophageal replacement (5 patients). One patient had transient cushingoid phenotype as a complication. There was not seen any major complication-like perforation. The mean follow-up period was 6±3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional steroid injection is an effective adjunct to dilatation in most of the children with short-segment strictures. It should be performed as a safe and efficient treatment option in patients with short-segment corrosive esophageal strictures resistant to dilatation therapy.

Caustic ingestion in children-A review

Various domestic or industrial chemicals may cause significant upper aerodigestive tract burns. Preventive measures should be up-scaled, especially in the developing world, to reduce the epidemic of accidental victims, largely unsupervised preschool children. External signs do not predict degree of injury. Non-invasive diagnostic screening includes radio-nuclear imaging, but early oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy remains the standard to predict stricture formation from circumferential submucosal scarring. Serial dilation is the mainstay of oesophageal stricture therapy, with oesophageal replacement reserved for severe refractory strictures. Intra-lesional steroid or mitomycin C may decrease the dilatations required for severe strictures, although long-term effects are unknown. Risk of secondary oesophageal carcinoma mandates long-term surveillance.

Endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures: a literature review

Benign esophageal strictures arise from various etiologies and are frequently encountered. Although endoscopic dilation is still the first-line therapy, recurrent strictures do occur in approximately 10% of the cases and remains a challenge to gastroenterologists. Areas covered: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for original and review articles on endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures. This review outlines the main available treatment options and its controversies in the management of refractory benign esophageal strictures. Expert commentary: Adding local steroid injections to dilation can be effective for peptic stenosis and strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection, but remains uncertain for anastomotic strictures. Intralesional injections of mitomycin-C could be useful in corrosive strictures. Incisional therapy can be a reliable alternative in Schatzki rings and in anastomotic strictures, in experienced hands. By contrast, long-term outcome with endoprosthetic treatment is disappointing, and stent placement should be carefully considered and individualized.

Anastomotic Strictures after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Incidence, Investigations, and Management, Including Treatment of Refractory and Recurrent Strictures

Improved surgical techniques, as well as preoperative and postoperative care, have dramatically changed survival of children with esophageal atresia (EA) over the last decades. Nowadays, we are increasingly seeing EA patients experiencing significant short- and long-term gastrointestinal morbidities. Anastomotic stricture (AS) is the most common complication following operative repair. An esophageal stricture is defined as an intrinsic luminal narrowing in a clinically symptomatic patient, but no symptoms are sensitive or specific enough to diagnose an AS. This review aims to provide a comprehensive view of AS in EA children. Given the lack of evidence-based data, we critically analyzed significant studies on children and adults, including comments on benign strictures with other etiologies. Despite there is no consensus about the goal of the luminal diameter based on the patient's age, esophageal contrast study, and/or endoscopy are recommended to assess the degree of the narrowing. A high variability in incidence of ASs is reported in literature, depending on different definitions of AS and on a great number of pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factor influencing the anastomosis outcome. The presence of a long gap between the two esophageal ends, with consequent anastomotic tension, is determinant for stricture formation and its response to treatment. The cornerstone of treatment is endoscopic dilation, whose primary aims are to achieve symptom relief, allow age-appropriate capacity for oral feeding, and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. No clear advantage of either balloon or bougie dilator has been demonstrated; therefore, the choice is based on operator experience and comfort with the equipment. Retrospective evidences suggest that selective dilatations (performed only in symptomatic patients) results in significantly less number of dilatation sessions than routine dilations (performed to prevent symptoms) with equal long-term outcomes. The response to dilation treatment is variable, and some patients may experience recurrent and refractory ASs. Adjunctive treatments have been used, including local injection of steroids, topical application of mitomycin C, and esophageal stenting, but long-term studies are needed to prove their efficacy and safety. Stricture resection or esophageal replacement with an interposition graft remains options for AS refractory to conservative treatments.

Treatment of Refractory Gastrointestinal Strictures With Mitomycin C: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Refractory benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures represent a difficult management problem given the limited therapeutic interventions available. We performed a systematic review of all published cases using mitomycin C in the treatment of GI strictures.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed to identify studies reporting application of mitomycin C for GI strictures. Review of titles/abstracts, full review of potentially relevant studies, and data abstraction were performed independently by 2 authors.

RESULTS

Of 549 citations, 24 studies with 145 patients (74% pediatric and 26% adult) met inclusion criteria. Esophageal strictures were the most common (79%) site of refractory strictures treated with mitomycin C, with caustic injury the most common underlying etiology. The concentration (range, 0.1 to 2 mg/mL; median, 0.4 mg/mL), number of applications (range, 1 to 12; median, 1), duration of applications (range, 1 to 5; median, 2 min), and technique of application (cotton pledget, spray, injection, special catheters) varied among studies. Ninety-one patients (73%; children: 80%, adults: 59%) had a complete response; 26 (21%) had a partial response. Only 1 (0.7%) adverse event was reported: cutaneous sclerosis attributed to microperforation and mitomycin C extravastion after injection. Mean follow-up was 23 (4 to 60) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Local mitomycin C application seems to be a safe and effective therapy for benign refractory GI strictures of varying etiology in both pediatric and adult populations. Although the results of this systematic review are highly encouraging, it should be considered investigational. Additional randomized trials and larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and to better define the optimal dose, concentration, duration and technique of mitomycin C application.

Techniques and principles of endoscopic treatment of benign gastrointestinal strictures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The fundamental goal of treating any stenosis is luminal enlargement to ameliorate the underlying obstructive symptoms. Symptoms depend on the etiology and the site of the stricture and may include dysphagia, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, obstipation, or frank bowel obstruction. This article compares the various current technologies available for the treatment of gastrointestinal stenoses with regard to ease and site of application, patient tolerance, safety and efficacy data, and cost-benefit ratio.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies indicate that gastrointestinal dilation and stenting have evolved to a point at which in many if not most situations they can be the first line therapy and potentially the final therapy needed to treat the underlying condition.

SUMMARY

Following techniques and principles in the management of gastrointestinal strictures would allow for the well tolerated and effective treatment of most patients with the tools currently available today.

Intramuscular injection of mitomycin C combined with endoscopic dilation for benign esophageal strictures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intramuscular injection of either mitomycin C or dexamethasone with endoscopic dilation for benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

Patients with benign esophageal strictures were retrospectively enrolled in this study and divided into three groups: mitomycin C group (mitomycin C injection with endoscopic dilation, dexamethasone group (dexamethasone injection and dilation) and dilation group (physiological saline injection and dilation). The patients' characteristics, locations of lesions, number of previous dilations, esophageal diameters after dilation, grades of dysphagia before and after the procedure and dysphagia-free period during the follow-up period were recorded.

RESULTS

Altogether 74 patients including 25 in the mitomycin C group, 25 in the dexamethasone group and 24 in the dilation group were enrolled. The diameter of the esophagus before the procedure was 3.32 ± 0.90 mm, 3.92 ± 1.55 mm and 3.70 ± 1.30 mm, respectively, while that was increased to 12.77 ± 1.62 mm, 12.14 ± 1.28 mm and 12.73 ± 1.42 mm after endoscopic dilation in the mitomycin C, dexamethasone and conventional dilation groups. The dysphagia-free period was 4.88 ± 1.66 months in the mitomycin C group, 4.02 ± 1.77 months in the dexamethasone group and 2.41 ± 1.26 months in the dilation group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intramuscular injection of mitomycin C or dexamethasone may prolong the dysphagia-free period and decrease the frequency of repeat dilations compared with conventional endoscopic dilations in patients with benign esophageal strictures.

A randomized controlled trial of endoscopic steroid injection for prophylaxis of esophageal stenoses after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Esophageal stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a serious adverse event that makes subsequent management more difficult.

METHODS

This parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label study was designed to examine whether local steroid injection is an effective prophylactic treatment for esophageal stenoses following extensive ESD. This single center trial was conducted at the Keiyukai Hospital, a tertiary care center for gastrointestinal disease in Japan [University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR) on 15 September 2011 (UMIN000006327)]. Thirty-two patients with mucosal defects involving ≥75% of the esophageal circumference were randomized to receive a single dose of triamcinolone acetonide injections (n = 16) or be treated conventionally (n = 16). The primary outcome was the frequency of stricture requiring endoscopic dilatation; the surrogate primary endpoint was the number of dilatation sessions needed. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates, the minimum diameter of the stenotic area and the duration of the course of dilatation treatments.

RESULTS

The frequency of stricture was not significantly different between the groups because of insufficient statistical power, but the number of dilatation sessions required was significantly less in the steroid group (6.1 sessions [95% confidence interval, CI 2.8-9.4] versus 12.5 [95% CI 7.1-17.9] sessions in the control group; P = 0.04). The perforation rate was similar in both groups. The minimum diameter of stenotic lumens was significantly greater in the treatment group than controls (11.0 mm versus 7.1 mm, respectively; P = 0.01). The perforation rate was not significantly different between the groups (1.0% versus 0.5% in the treatment and control group, respectively). Steroid injection was effective in cases of mucosal defects encompassing the entire esophageal circumference.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic endoscopic steroid injection appears to be a safe means of relieving the severity of esophageal stenoses following extensive ESD.

Prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of esophageal mucosal lesions is associated with a risk of esophageal stenosis, especially for near-circumferential or circumferential esophageal mucosal defects. Here, we review historic and modern studies on the prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after ESD. These methods include prevention via pharmacological treatment, endoscopic autologous cell transplantation, endoscopic esophageal dilatation, and stent placement. This short review will focus on direct prevention and treatment, which may help guide the way forward.

A prospective randomized trial of intralesional triamcinolone injections after endoscopic dilation for complex esophagogastric anastomotic strictures: steroid injection after endoscopic dilation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postoperative esophageal strictures frequently recur. We assessed the efficacy of injecting triamcinolone after bougie dilation in comparison to dilation alone.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized fashion, 19 patients (68% male with mean age of 53-years old) with non-dilated esophagogastric complex strictures after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up were assigned to receive dilation alone (control) or 40 mg of triamcinolone at the borders of the wall lacerations caused by the bougienage in each dilation session during the study follow-up. Dysphagia and complications were assessed at 1, 2, and 6 months. Primary end-point was to be dysphagia-free.

RESULTS

After 1 month of the beginning of therapy, 4 patients in the steroid group were without dysphagia, in comparison to 0 patient in the control group (P = 0.021). Six months after endoscopic therapy, 62% of the cases in the triamcinolone group versus none in the control group were dysphagia-free (P = 0.009). There was no perforation nor hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Injecting triamcinolone after every dilation session next to or at the borders of the lacerations caused by the dilators, results in a significant improvement or resolution of dysphagia.

Stents for benign and malignant esophageal strictures

This paper presents commentaries on endotherapy for esophageal perforation/leaks; treatment of esophageal perforation; whether esophageal stents should be used for treating benign esophageal strictures; what determines the optimal stenting period in benign esophageal strictures/leaks; how to choose an esophageal stent; how a new fistula secondary to an esophageal stent should be treated; which strategy should be adopted when a fistula of a cervical anastomosis occurs; intralesional steroids for refractory esophageal strictures; balloon and bougie dilators for esophageal strictures and predictors of response to dilation; whether refractory strictures from different etiologies respond differently to endotherapy; surgical therapy of benign esophageal strictures; and whether stenoses following severe esophageal burns should be treated by esophageal resection or esophageal bypass.

Endoscopic repair of post-surgical gastrointestinal complications

Complications following gastrointestinal surgery may require re-intervention, can lead to prolonged hospitalization, and significantly increase health costs. Some complications, such as anastomotic leakage, fistula, and stricture require a multidisciplinary approach. Therapeutic endoscopy may play a pivotal role in these conditions, allowing minimally invasive treatment. Different endoscopic approaches, including fibrin glue injection, endoclips, self-expanding stents, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted devices have been introduced for both anastomotic leakage and fistula treatment. Similarly endoscopic treatments, such as endoscopic dilation, incisional therapy, and self-expanding stents have been used for anastomotic strictures. All these techniques can be safely performed by skilled endoscopists, and may achieve a high technical success rate in both the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Here we will review the endoscopic management of post-surgical complications; these techniques should be considered as first-line approach in selected patients, allowing to avoid re-operation, reduce hospital stay, and decrease costs.

Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone

BACKGROUND

Recent technological advances have allowed superficially spreading intramucosal carcinomas of the esophagus to be successfully resected by circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (cESD). After this procedure, esophageal strictures develop in most patients and are mainly treated by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD).

OBJECTIVE

To compare oral steroids plus EBD with EBD alone for the management of benign esophageal strictures after cESD.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

We studied 23 consecutive patients who underwent complete cESD for superficial esophageal carcinoma (22 squamous cell carcinomas and 1 adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett's esophagus).

INTERVENTION

After cESD, patients were managed with EBD alone (EBD, n = 13) or with EBD and oral prednisolone (steroid + EBD, n = 10), 30 mg daily, started 2 days after cESD and gradually tapered and discontinued after 8 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Total number of EBD sessions and total EBD period (months).

RESULTS

Steroid + EBD patients required fewer sessions (13.8 ± 6.9 vs 33.5 ± 22.9; P < .001) and a shorter management period (4.8 ± 2.3 vs 14.2 ± 17.5 months, P = .005) compared with the EBD group. An additional 3 patients received oral steroids a mean interval of 158 days after cESD. These patients required more EBD sessions (46.3 ± 30.0; P = .002), and the EBD period was significantly longer (17.5 ± 13.0 months; P = .005) than in the early steroid + EBD group.

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized study; retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSION

After cESD, oral steroid therapy dramatically reduced the need for EBD. We conclude that oral steroid therapy after EBD is an effective strategy for the management of esophageal strictures after complete cESD.

Endoscopic corticosteroid injections do not reduce dysphagia after endoscopic dilation therapy in patients with benign esophagogastric anastomotic strictures

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Benign anastomotic strictures are often difficult to treat. We assessed the efficacy of adding corticosteroid injections to endoscopic dilation therapy with Savary bougienage.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind trial, 60 patients (mean age, 63 ± 9 years; 78% male) with an untreated cervical anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and dysphagia for at least solid food were randomly assigned to groups given 4 quadrant injections of 0.5 mL triamcinolone (40 mg/mL, n = 29) or saline (controls, n = 31) into the stricture, followed by Savary dilation to 16 mm. Dysphagia, complications, and quality of life were assessed after 1 and 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary end point was a dysphagia-free period of 6 months.

RESULTS

In the corticosteroid group, 45% of the patients remained dysphagia-free for 6 months, compared with 36% of controls (relative risk, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-2.36; P = .46). Median time to repeat dilation was 108 days (range, 15-180 days) in the corticosteroid group vs 42 days (range, 17-180 days) for controls (P = .11). A median number of 2 dilations (range, 1-7) was performed in the corticosteroid group vs 3 dilations (range, 1-9) in controls (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.38; P = .36). Two major intervention-related complications occurred, 1 submucosal laceration in the corticosteroid group and 1 hemorrhage in the control group. Four patients in the corticosteroid group, but none of the controls, developed Candida esophagitis (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroid injections do not provide a statistically significant decrease in frequency of repeat dilations or prolongation of the dysphagia-free period in patients with benign anastomotic esophagogastric strictures. Dutch Trial Registration Number 2236.

Efficacy of intralesional corticosteroid injection in endoscopic treatment of esophageal strictures

BACKGROUND

The present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of intralesional triamcinolone to improve the results of endoscopic dilation in esophageal strictures.

METHODS

We treated 9 patients with complex strictures of different etiologies (2 postsurgery, 3 gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 4 caustic) with intralesional injections of triamcinolone followed by endoscopic dilations. Outcomes of triamcinolone-treated patients were compared with those of historical control. We injected triamcinolone before dilating the strictures. All the patients were followed up for 1 year. The interval between dilations, frequency of dilation, and refractory rates were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the control group and the patients with steroids regarding baseline characteristics (age and sex distribution of patients and stricture etiologies, length, and location). The patients in the triamcinolone group had a bigger improvement of their dysphagia and had a lower refractority rate than the patients in control group, these differences being statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional triamcinolone presented a higher improvement of dysphagia and a lower refractority rate in patients with complex strictures with statistically significant differences.

Different healing process of esophageal large mucosal defects by endoscopic mucosal dissection between with and without steroid injection in an animal model

Background

Stricture formation is one of the major complications after endoscopic removal of large superficial squamous cell neoplasms of the esophagus, and local steroid injections have been adopted to prevent it. However, fundamental pathological alterations related to them have not been well analyzed so far. The aim of this study was to analyze the time course of the healing process of esophageal large mucosal defects resulting in stricture formation and its modification by local steroid injection, using an animal model.

Methods

Esophageal circumferential mucosal defects were created by endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) for four pigs. One pig was sacrificed five minutes after the ESD, and other two pigs were followed-up on endoscopy and sacrificed at the time of one week and three weeks after the ESD, respectively. The remaining one pig was followed-up on endoscopy with five times of local steroid injection and sacrificed at the time of eight weeks after the ESD. The esophageal tissues of all pigs were subjected to pathological analyses.

Results

For the pigs without steroid injection, the esophageal stricture was completed around three weeks after the ESD on both endoscopy and esophagography. Histopathological examination of the esophageal tissues revealed that spindle-shaped α-smooth muscle actin (SMA)-positive myofibroblasts arranged in a parallel fashion and extending horizontally were identified at the ulcer bed one week after the ESD, and increased contributing to formation of the stenotic luminal ridge covered with the regenerated epithelium three weeks after the ESD. The proper muscle layer of the stricture site was thinned with some myocytes which seemingly showed transition to the myofibroblast layer. By contrast, for the pig with steroid injection, esophageal stricture formation was not evident with limited appearance of the spindle-shaped myofibroblasts, instead, appearance of stellate or polygocal SMA-positive stromal cells arranged haphazardly in the persistent granulation tissue of the ulcer site.

Conclusions

Proliferation of spindle-shaped myofibroblasts arranged in a parallel fashion is likely to play an important role in stricture formation after circumferential mucosal defects by esophageal ESD, which may be related to the thinning of the proper muscle layer in the healing course of the defects. Local steroid injection seems to be effective to prevent the stricture through the modification of this process.

Surgical approach to cervical esophagogastric anastomoses for post-esophagectomy complications

In gastric tube reconstruction, anastomotic leakage and stricture occasionally occur. Additionally, new or recurrent cancer may occur in the esophageal remnant or at the anastomotic site. Such complications, after cervical anastomoses, led to our adoption of a procedure to approach the anastomosis by manubrium and proximal left clavicle resection. This procedure was applied to seven patients between April 2000 and March 2011. The mean age of the patients was 69.9 years (range, 65-76 years); all were men. The mean operative time was 506 min (range, 374-845 min), with an average blood loss of 297 ml (range, 180-606 ml). Esophagogastric anastomoses were performed in two cases, and free jejunal graft transplantations were performed in the remaining five cases; oral intake became possible for all patients. Limited range of motion or other movement disorders of the neck and upper limbs, due to the upper sternum and clavicle resection, were not observed. This invasive surgical procedure can be acceptable for patients who are facing life-threatening consequences or significant decreases in quality of life and are resistant to conservative treatment.

[Management of caustic esophagitis in children]

In children, caustic ingestion is due to accidents at home and inadequate storage of caustic agents. In emergency, it is useful to remove the soiled clothes, rinse the affected area, and prevent vomiting and feeding. Caustic ingestion (pH<2 or>12) induces burns of the upper gastrointestinal tract requiring esophagogastro-duodenoscopy between H12 and H24. Strong alkalis cause necrosis with liquefaction of the esophagus, penetrating deeply with a high-risk of perforation. Management of these children requires a specialized care center with an intensive care unit, endoscopic equipment, and a surgical team. Esophageal stricture is the main complication; no prophylactic treatment (steroids) is effective. Strictures occur after the 3rd week, and barium swallow should be performed by the end of the 1st month. Stricture are often multiple, long, and tortuous; endoscopic dilatation is difficult with a high-rate of perforation and a low-rate of success. In situ application of mitomycin C or injection of triamcinolone could reduce the recurrence rate of stricture. In recalcitrant or recurrent strictures, it is recommended to perform an esophageal replacement using a colonic interposition or a gastric tube. Endoscopy should also be performed 15-20years after caustic ingestion to screen for early neoplastic lesions. Prevention is very important for avoiding caustic ingestions. Information and education should be given specifically to the parents of toddlers; caustic products should be stored out of reach of children and they should not be kept with food.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently accepted as the major treatment modality for superficial neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract including the esophagus. An important advantage of ESD is its effectiveness in resecting lesions regardless of their size and severity of fibrosis. Based on excellent outcomes for esophageal neoplasms with a small likelihood of lymph node metastasis, the number of ESD candidates has increased. On the other hand, ESD still requires highly skilled endoscopists due to technical difficulties. To avoid unnecessary complications including perforation and postoperative stricture, the indications for ESD require careful consideration and a full understanding of this modality. This article, in the highlight topic series, provides detailed information on the indication, procedure, outcome, complications and their prevention in ESD of superficial esophageal neoplasms.

Endoscopic management of difficult or recurrent esophageal strictures

Esophageal strictures are a common problem in gastroenterological practice. In general, the management of malignant or benign esophageal strictures is different and requires a different treatment approach. In daily clinical practice, stent placement is a commonly used modality for the palliation of incurable malignant strictures causing dysphagia, whereas, if available, intraluminal brachytherapy can be considered in patients with a good performance status. Recurrent dysphagia frequently occurs in malignant cases. In case of tissue in- or overgrowth, a second stent is placed. If stent migration occurs, the stent can be repositioned or a second (preferably partially covered) stent can be placed. Food obstruction of the stent lumen can be resolved by endoscopic cleansing. The cornerstone of the management of benign strictures is still dilation therapy (Savary-Gilliard bougie or balloon). There are a subgroup of strictures that are refractory or recur and an alternative approach is required. In order to prevent stricture recurrence, steroid injections into the stricture followed by dilation can be considered. In case of anastomotic strictures or Schatzki rings, incisional therapy is a safe method in experienced hands. Temporary stent placement is a third option before considering self-bougienage or surgery as a salvage treatment. In this review, the most frequently used endoscopic treatment modalities for malignant and benign stricture management will be discussed based on the available literature, and some practical information for the management in daily clinical practice will be provided.

Transhiatal jejunal interposition preserving the whole stomach and vagal trunk for a benign esophageal stricture in a male adolescent: report of a case

Benign esophageal strictures are generally treated with medication and balloon dilation; however, when repeated dilations fail, surgery is the only option. When performing surgery for benign esophageal stricture in young patients, it is important to consider not only the surgical stress and likelihood of complications but also digestive function after reconstruction, the durability of the reconstruction, and the potential for cancerous change in the reconstructed organs. We describe how we treated a 14-year-old boy with benign esophageal stricture by performing transhiatal esophagectomy assisted by mediastinoscopy, preserving the whole stomach and vagus nerve, and interposing pedicled jejunum between the cervical esophagus and stomach through a posterior mediastinal route, with good long-term results.