Supplemental nasogastric feeding in cystic fibrosis patients during treatment for acute exacerbation of chest disease

Brazilian Guidelines for Nutrition in Cystic Fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a scientific consensus on nutrition in cystic fibrosis.

METHODS

Sixteen coordinators elaborated relevant questions on nutritional therapy in cystic fibrosis, which were divided into six sections: nutritional assessment, nutritional recommendations, nutritional intervention, dietary counseling, special situations and enzyme replacement, and gastrointestinal manifestations. Two to three specialists in the field were responsible for each section and obtaining answers formulated based on standardized bibliographic searches. The available literature was searched in the PubMed®/MEDLINE database, after training and standardization of search strategies, to write the best level of evidence for the questions elaborated. Issues related to disagreement were discussed until a consensus was reached among specialists, based on the current scientific literature.

RESULTS

Forty-two questions were prepared and objectively answered, resulting in a consensus of nutritional therapy in cystic fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

This work enabled establishing a scientific consensus for nutritional treatment of cystic fibrosis patients.

Enteral tube feeding for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Enteral tube feeding is routinely used in many cystic fibrosis centres when oral dietary and supplement intake has failed to achieve an adequate nutritional status. The use of this method of feeding is assessed on an individual basis taking into consideration the patients age and clinical status. This is a final update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence that in people with cystic fibrosis, supplemental enteral tube feeding improves nutritional status, respiratory function, and quality of life without significant adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also contacted the companies that market enteral feeds and reviewed their databases.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 10 July 2019.Date of the most recent hand search of PubMed: 26 October 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing supplemental enteral tube feeding for one month or longer with no specific intervention in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The searches identified 44 trials; however, none were eligible for inclusion in this review.

MAIN RESULTS

There are no trials included in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Supplemental enteral tube feeding is widely used throughout the world to improve nutritional status in people with cystic fibrosis. The methods mostly used, nasogastric or gastrostomy feeding, are expensive and may have a negative effect on self-esteem and body image. Reported use of enteral tube feeding suggests that it results in nutritional and respiratory improvement; but, efficacy has not been fully assessed by randomised controlled trials. It is acknowledged, however, that performing a randomised controlled trial would be difficult due to the ethics of withholding an intervention in a group of people whose nutritional status necessitates it.

Clinical economics review: nutritional support

Nutritional support currently accounts for about 1% of the total health care costs in the USA. Interestingly, most of the prospective randomized controlled trials to date have not been able to demonstrate that this therapeutic intervention alters morbidity or mortality. In fact, parenteral nutritional support may predispose the recipients to developing systemic infections. There have been a few areas in which nutritional support may be of benefit. Enteral supplements given to underweight women who suffer hip fractures reduce the hospital stay and, presumably, overall cost. Preoperative parenteral nutritional support may produce a small absolute reduction in post-operative morbidity, but its cost becomes prohibitive. Preoperative enteral nutritional support, especially if carried out in the home, may be of benefit (using the most optimistic interpretation of a small number of trials); if so, it is an economically defensible intervention. Particular nutrients or diets may have specific effects on certain disease processes. Indirect comparisons have suggested that elemental diets can be used to treat flares of Crohn's disease (perhaps because putative food antigens are removed). However, corticosteroid therapy is more efficacious. Furthermore, it is less expensive to employ 6-mercaptopurine as the next modality in steroid failures. Branched-chain amino acid infusions may have some effect on hepatic encephalopathy, but again, lactulose is less expensive. Nutritional support is one area of medicine in which there has been far more enthusiasm than the data justify. Disease-associated malnutrition probably is a secondary phenomenon, not an important cause of morbidity. The widespread use of this modality cannot be justified in a cost-constrained health care system.